Chronic Osteomyelitis Imaging 

  • Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR; Chief Editor: Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM   more...
 
Updated: Apr 12, 2011
 

Overview

Osteomyelitis is an infection of bone and bone marrow. It may be subdivided into acute, subacute, and chronic stages. Chronic osteomyelitis may appear as such at the initial presentation; not all patients show progression through the 3 phases. Rarely, a sclerotic nonpurulent form of osteomyelitis occurs; this is termed Garrès sclerosing osteomyelitis. Other related disorders are chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis, tuberculous osteomyelitis, synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome.[1, 2, 3, 4]

See the images of osteomyelitis below.

Osteomyelitis, chronic. Sclerosing osteomyelitis oOsteomyelitis, chronic. Sclerosing osteomyelitis of the lower tibia. Note the bone expansion and marked sclerosis. Osteomyelitis, chronic. CT scans show vertebral osOsteomyelitis, chronic. CT scans show vertebral osteomyelitis associated with a psoas abscess. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Short-tau inversion recoveOsteomyelitis, chronic. Short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) MRIs show bone marrow edema of the clavicle and periclavicular fluid (pus).

Chronic osteomyelitis is a severe, persistent, and sometimes incapacitating infection of bone and bone marrow. It is often a recurring condition because it is difficult to treat definitively. This disease may result from the following:

  • Inadequate treatment of acute osteomyelitis
  • A hematogenous type of osteomyelitis
  • Trauma
  • Iatrogenic causes such as joint replacements and the internal fixation of fractures
  • Compound fractures
  • Infection with organisms, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Treponema species (syphilis)
  • Contiguous spread from soft tissues, as may occur with diabetic ulcers or ulcers associated with peripheral vascular disease

Cierny and Mader proposed an anatomic classification of chronic osteomyelitis:

  • Type 1 — Endosteal or medullary lesion
  • Type 2 — Superficial osteomyelitis limited to the surface
  • Type 3 — Localized, well-marked legion with sequestration and cavity formation
  • Type 4 — Diffuse osteomyelitis lesions

Preferred examination

Radiologic assessment of chronic osteomyelitis is performed for the following reasons: (1) to evaluate bone involvement (eg, the extent of active intramedullary infection or abscess superimposed on areas of necrosis, sequestrum and fibrosis) and (2) to identify soft tissue involvement (areas of cellulitis, abscess, and sinus tracts).

Plain radiographs are usually obtained initially. Ultrasonography may readily depict soft tissue involvement, but it provides only limited information about bone changes.[5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]

Because of its high sensitivity in the detection of bone marrow changes, MRI may provide detailed information regarding the extent and activity of the process by allowing the detection of the intramedullary site of infection and its complications. MRI may also be used to distinguish soft tissue involvement, allowing differential diagnosis. With scintigraphy, other conditions not involving bone marrow, such as cellulitis and myositis, may cause errors; scintigraphy may be indicated for the assessment of local disturbances in vascular perfusion that are common in cases of chronic osteomyelitis.[12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]

Limitations of techniques

Although plain radiographs may provide important clues for diagnosis (eg, demonstration of bone remodeling, sclerosis, and thickening), the radiographic impression is often equivocal and relies heavily on clinical findings.

CT may depict intramedullary and soft tissue gas, sequestra, sinus tracts, and foreign bodies. However, CT scanning is insufficient for the assessment of the activity of the process.

MRI has limited availability, it is relatively expensive, and it is contraindicated in patients with certain implant devices and metallic clips. In addition, MRI is not tolerated by all patients with claustrophobia or morbid obesity, and young children may require sedation. Good MRIs require patient cooperation because patient motion degrades the images.

Next

Radiography

For the detection of acute osteomyelitis, the sensitivity of plain radiography is less than 5% at presentation and about 33% at 1 week; however, the sensitivity is 90% 3-4 weeks after presentation. Stress fractures, osteoid osteomas, and other causes of periosteitis may mimic acute or chronic osteomyelitis.

Plain radiographic findings in acute or subacute osteomyelitis are deep soft tissue swelling, a periosteal reaction, cortical irregularity, and demineralization. The chronic phase of the disease is characterized by thick, irregular, sclerotic bone interspersed with radiolucencies, an elevated periosteum, and chronic draining sinuses.[19]

See the radiographic images of chronic osteomyelitis below.

Osteomyelitis, chronic. Sclerosing osteomyelitis oOsteomyelitis, chronic. Sclerosing osteomyelitis of the lower tibia. Note the bone expansion and marked sclerosis. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Sequestrum of the lower tiOsteomyelitis, chronic. Sequestrum of the lower tibia. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Image in a 56-year-old manOsteomyelitis, chronic. Image in a 56-year-old man with diabetes shows chronic osteomyelitis of the calcaneum. Note air in the soft tissues. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Radiograph (left) and isotOsteomyelitis, chronic. Radiograph (left) and isotopic bone scans (right) show sclerosing osteomyelitis of the tibia. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Plain radiographs show GarOsteomyelitis, chronic. Plain radiographs show Garrès sclerosing osteomyelitis. (See also the next image.) Osteomyelitis, chronic. Technetium-99m diphosphonaOsteomyelitis, chronic. Technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans show increased activity in the region with Garrès sclerosing osteomyelitis.

Sclerosing osteomyelitis of Garré most commonly affects the mandible and appears with a focal sclerosing periosteal reaction on radiologic studies.

Chronic recurrent osteomyelitis is a benign self-limiting condition that primarily affects long bones in children and adolescents. The metaphysis of long bones are usually affected; changes may be symmetrical. The appearances are those of confluent areas of bone lysis.

A Brodie abscess is a subacute osteomyelitis with a predilection for the ends of long bones and the carpus and tarsus. Plain radiographic findings include the following:

  • A central area of radiolucency with a surrounding thick rim of reactive bone sclerosis, which may persist for months
  • Pathognomonic tortuous parallel lucent channels extending toward the growth plate
  • A variable degree of periosteal new-bone formation
  • Associated soft tissue swelling
Previous
Next

Computed Tomography

CT is of definite value for studying the entire articular surface of bone and periarticular soft tissues; for delineating the extent of medullary and soft tissue involvement; and for demonstrating cavities, serpiginous tracts, sequestra, or cloacae in osteomyelitis.[20, 21, 22]

CT may depict intramedullary and soft tissue gas, sequestra, sinus tracts, and foreign bodies. CT shows more sequestra than does the conventional method of investigation. An important advantage of CT is its ability to demonstrate lesions in the medulla and infections in the soft tissues. CT is the standard modality when looking for a sequestrum.

In the United Kingdom, CT is reserved for cases in which fistulae are present and when conventional methods with tomography leave problems unsolved. In the United States, conventional tomography is being used less often; it is being replaced by CT. However, CT is insufficient for assessing the activity of the disease process in chronic osteomyelitis.

One advantage of CT is that, for patients with acute osteomyelitis, it depicts changes earlier in the disease process than does plain imaging. CT is especially good for imaging the spine, the pelvis, and the sternum.

See the CT scans of osteomyelitis below.

Osteomyelitis, chronic. CT scans show vertebral osOsteomyelitis, chronic. CT scans show vertebral osteomyelitis associated with a psoas abscess. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Axial CT scans show destruOsteomyelitis, chronic. Axial CT scans show destruction of L1. Note the air in the soft tissues.

CT scans sometimes show soft tissue edema or bone destruction not seen on plain images, particularly in the setting of acute osteomyelitis. Sclerosis, demineralization, and periosteal reactions are usually well depicted in chronic osteomyelitis. CT also helps in evaluating the need for surgery, and it provides vital information about the extent of disease. This information is helpful in planning appropriate surgery. CT is also an important modality in image-guided biopsy.

Stress fractures, osteoid osteomas, and other causes of periosteitis may mimic acute or chronic osteomyelitis.

Previous
Next

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The sensitivity and specificity of MRI are higher than those of plain radiography and CT; MRI is particularly good at depicting bone marrow abnormalities. On MRI, marrow signal abnormality is more sensitive than lytic changes on plain images, and findings become positive earlier in the disease process with MRI than with radiography. Intramedullary bone pathology may be directly visualized with MRI; in marrow with osteomyelitis, these findings may precede bone changes.

One advantage of MRI is its multiplanar capability; because of this mutiplanar capability, MRI provides better anatomic detail and better soft tissue contrast. MRI is especially good in assessing vertebral osteomyelitis, which has a characteristic pattern of confluent vertebral body and disk involvement. The presence of titanium devises and other orthopedic devises usually poses no problem apart from causing artifacts.

However, MRI findings of osteomyelitis are nonspecific, and similar changes may occur as a result of tumors, fractures, and a variety of other intramedullary or juxtamedullary processes that may cause bone marrow edema. The sensitivity and specificity have been reported to be 92-100% and 89-100%, respectively. Previous fracture changes associated with surgery or the fracture itself are difficult to differentiate from infection. Fractures, bone bruises, and benign or malignant bone tumors may all mimic osteomyelitis.

MRI findings in osteomyelitis usually are related to the replacement of marrow fat with water secondary to edema, exudate, hyperemia, and bone ischemia. Findings include the following: decreased signal intensity in the involved bone on T1-weighted images, increased signal intensity in the involved bone on T2-weighted image, and increased signal intensity in the involved bone on short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) images (see the images below.[23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]

Osteomyelitis, chronic. Short-tau inversion recoveOsteomyelitis, chronic. Short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) MRIs show bone marrow edema of the clavicle and periclavicular fluid (pus). Osteomyelitis, chronic. T1-weighted nonenhanced (tOsteomyelitis, chronic. T1-weighted nonenhanced (top) and gadolinium-enhanced (bottom) axial MRIs show the enhancement at the inflammatory site in the clavicle. (See also the previous 3 images.) Osteomyelitis, chronic. A 20-year-old patient undeOsteomyelitis, chronic. A 20-year-old patient underwent intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial fracture 2 years before presenting with a painful leg. Radiographs show no evidence of osteomyelitis. (See also the next 5 images.) Osteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99mOsteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans in the same patient as in the previous image and in the next 4 images show changes suggestive of osteomyelitis. Osteomyelitis, chronic. This 69-year-old man preseOsteomyelitis, chronic. This 69-year-old man presented with epigastric pain. Plain radiograph of the lumbar spine shows changes of osteoarthritis (see also the next 3 images). Osteomyelitis, chronic. Axial CT scans show destruOsteomyelitis, chronic. Axial CT scans show destruction of L1. Note the air in the soft tissues. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Technetium-99m diphosphonaOsteomyelitis, chronic. Technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scan in the same patient as in the previous image and next image show increased activity in the upper lumbar spine. Osteomyelitis, chronic. T1- and T2-weighted sagittOsteomyelitis, chronic. T1- and T2-weighted sagittal MRIs show bone marrow edema in L1 and obliteration of the disk space between L1 and L2. (See also the previous 5 images.)

Sequestrum of cortical bone appears hypointense on T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and STIR MRIs and shows no gadolinium enhancement. Sequestrum of cancellous bone is hyperintense relative to cortical sequestrum on T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and STIR images and shows no gadolinium enhancement. The involucrum is hypointense on all 3 types of images and shows gadolinium enhancement.

Granulation tissue is hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted and STIR images. It shows gadolinium enhancement. Similarly, draining sinuses and soft tissue inflammation are hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted and STIR images; however, it does show gadolinium enhancement.

A Brodie abscess is characterized by a double line at the site of the lesion, caused by the high signal intensity of granulation tissue surrounded by low signal intensity of bone sclerosis on T2-weighted MRIs. The lesion has low to intermediate signal intensity that is outlined by a hypointense rim on T1-weighted MRIs.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist], gadobenate dimeglumine [MultiHance], gadodiamide [Omniscan], gadoversetamide [OptiMARK], gadoteridol [ProHance]) have been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). For more information, see the eMedicine topic Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy. The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or MRA scans.

NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble moving or straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness. For more information, see the FDA Public Health Advisory or Medscape.

Previous
Next

Ultrasonography

The physical properties of bone do not usually lend themselves to ultrasonographic investigation, because of the reflection of sound waves at a soft tissue–bone interface. However, the periosteum, early new-bone formation, and soft tissue changes alongside dense bone may be imaged. There have been occasional reports of the use of sonography in cases of acute osteomyelitis, but its role in evaluating chronic osteomyelitis is probably limited.

Cleveland and Peck reported a case in which high-resolution ultrasonography was instrumental in establishing a diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis.[29] Sonograms depicted a periosteal reaction and associated soft tissue involvement.

Larcos and associates found that 2 of 19 patients had a false-positive sonographic diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis. They concluded that ultrasonographic results might be potentially misleading, and they emphasized the importance of clinical judgment and role of other test results.[30]

High false-positive and false-negative rates are expected in cases of chronic osteomyelitis.

Previous
Next

Nuclear Imaging

Technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scanning

99m Tc methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scans are usually positive 24 hours after an acute infection, and the scans demonstrate a well-defined focus of tracer activity 1-2 hours after the injection. This finding is correlated with radiotracer in same area on dynamic scans (see the images below).[31, 32, 33, 34]

Osteomyelitis, chronic. Radiographs of the foot ofOsteomyelitis, chronic. Radiographs of the foot of a 52-year-old diabetic man with symptoms show no bone abnormality. (See also the next 2 images.) Osteomyelitis, chronic. Radiographs of the foot ofOsteomyelitis, chronic. Radiographs of the foot of the same patient as in the previous image obtained 2 weeks later show patchy loss of bone density in the distal fourth metatarsal bone. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99mOsteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans of the same patient as in the previous 2 images show increased activity in the third and fourth metatarsal bones and in the third toe. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Indium-111–labeled WBC scaOsteomyelitis, chronic. Indium-111–labeled WBC scans show an infected right-knee prosthesis.

Bone scintigraphy may show focal uptake at the affected site. Osteomyelitis may be multifocal, and bone scintigraphy is particularly valuable in looking for other sites of infection.

MDP scans are positive in most patients with subacute and chronic osteomyelitis. Increased focal activity may persist in sterile disease for up to 2 years following successful therapy. (See the images below.)

Osteomyelitis, chronic. A 20-year-old patient undeOsteomyelitis, chronic. A 20-year-old patient underwent intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial fracture 2 years before presenting with a painful leg. Radiographs show no evidence of osteomyelitis. (See also the next 5 images.) Osteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99mOsteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans in the same patient as in the previous image and in the next 4 images show changes suggestive of osteomyelitis. Osteomyelitis, chronic. This 69-year-old man preseOsteomyelitis, chronic. This 69-year-old man presented with epigastric pain. Plain radiograph of the lumbar spine shows changes of osteoarthritis (see also the next 3 images). Osteomyelitis, chronic. Axial CT scans show destruOsteomyelitis, chronic. Axial CT scans show destruction of L1. Note the air in the soft tissues. Osteomyelitis, chronic. Technetium-99m diphosphonaOsteomyelitis, chronic. Technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scan in the same patient as in the previous image and next image show increased activity in the upper lumbar spine. Osteomyelitis, chronic. T1- and T2-weighted sagittOsteomyelitis, chronic. T1- and T2-weighted sagittal MRIs show bone marrow edema in L1 and obliteration of the disk space between L1 and L2. (See also the previous 5 images.)

MDP scans are highly sensitive, and the whole body may be imaged with a relatively low whole-body radiation dose. The sensitivity of MDP has variably been reported in the range of 32-100%, but the overall sensitivity is more than 90% in adults in the absence of complicating factors. Sensitivity is lower with earlier studies; in neonates; and in elderly persons with osteoporosis, severe peripheral vascular disease, and metabolic bone disease. The specificity is variably reported in the range of 0-100%.

The sensitivity of MDP scans may be improved by use of a 3-phase bone scan. On such scans, focal activity is usually associated with mild, diffusely increased, regional activity distal to the sight of osteomyelitis. Occasionally, photon deficient (cold) defects are seen.

Gallium-67 scanning

Mechanisms of67 Ga citrate uptake include the following: (1) direct leukocyte and bacterial uptake, (2) lactoferrin and transferring binding, (3) increased vascularity, and (4) increased bone turnover.[35, 36]

Criteria for a positive gallium scan include uptake exceeding that of the bone scan and/or uptake that differs in distribution in comparison with that on bone scans.

Johnson et al evaluated 22 diabetic patients with osteomyelitis by using gallium scans. The results yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 40%, and an accuracy of 73%. In Schauwecker's review of the literature, the sensitivity was 81% and the specificity was 69%.[37]

Gallium scanning has a proven role in the monitoring of treatment.

If patients with suspected acute osteomyelitis are currently untreated and if99m Tc diphosphonate and gallium scans show concordant pattern, the scans are interpreted as follows: If99m Tc diphosphonate uptake is less than gallium uptake, infection is suggested. If99m Tc diphosphonate uptake is greater than gallium uptake, reactive bone is suggested. If99m Tc diphosphonate and gallium uptake are discordant and if uptake is truly in bone, the likely diagnosis is osteomyelitis.

The sensitivity and specificity are 22-100% and 0-100%, respectively.67 Ga scanning is more specific than MDP scanning, with relatively good images.67 Ga is a better imaging agent in cases of chronic osteomyelitis; it is particularly good for imaging fungal infections. It also appears better than WBC for detecting vertebral osteomyelitis. The main disadvantages are its longer imaging time (72 h), its higher radiation dose, and the fact that it is unsuitable for use in pediatric patients.

Indium-111 WBC and99m Tc hexamethylenepropyleneamineoxime scanning

111 In WBC scans may show normal lung uptake for up to 7 hours. At 24 hours, spleen activity greater than that in the liver and marrow is seen. Uptake is increased in cases of both acute and chronic osteomyelitis. Occasional cold (up to 12%) may occur in areas with significant red marrow, where uptake in the marrow is greater than that in the inflamed site.[38, 39, 40]

111 In-labeled WBCs are generally more specific than MDP or67 Ga and enable faster imaging than67 Ga scanning. The sensitivity is 83%, and the specificity is 94%. Previous antibiotic or steroid therapy does not affect the sensitivity. The disadvantages include the need for 50 mL of blood for labeling, its complicated formulation, and a higher radiation dose. Hence,111 In techniques are not suitable for pediatric patients. The images are also relatively poor and may take up to 24 hours to acquire because of the low dosage.[38, 39, 40]

99m Tc hexamethylenepropyleneamineoxime (HMPAO) scanning is similar to111 In scanning, though more activity may be seen in other organs. The main advantages of99m Tc HMPAO WBC scanning are its faster imaging, its lower radiation dose, and the use of lower-energy photons for better images. Also, single-photon emission CT (SPECT) images may be obtained if required. The disadvantages include the need for phlebotomy, complicated labeling, and a "dirtier" image. The sensitivity and specificity are 95% and 85%, respectively.

2-[Fluorine 18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography

FDG is a nonspecific tracer that accumulates at sites of infection and inflammation. FDG PET imaging play a major role in the treatment of patients with suspected infection and inflammation. PET has shown value in the diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis, infected prostheses, and fever of unknown origin. Because of its ability to quantitate the rate of FDG uptake, PET may prove to be a powerful modality for monitoring disease activity and responses to therapy. Thus, the detection and characterization of infection and inflammation may become a major clinical indication in the day-to-day practice of PET imaging.

Meller and associates prospectively compared111 In-labeled WBCs and 2-[fluorine 18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) by using a coincidence dual-head camera[41] and found that FDG DHCC imaging was superior to111 In WBC scintigraphy in the diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis in the central skeleton. During diagnostic workup, chronic osteomyelitis was proved in 11 or 36 regions of suspected skeletal infection and was subsequently excluded in 25. In addition, soft tissue infection was present in 5 patients, and septic arthritis was present in 3. In 28 patients,111 In WBC results were true-positive in 2 of 11 regions with proven chronic osteomyelitis; results were true-negative in 21 of 23 regions without further evidence of chronic osteomyelitis. False-positive results occurred in 2 regions, and false-negative results occurred in 9 regions suspected for chronic osteomyelitis.

The authors concluded that, therefore, it should be considered the method of choice for this indication. This seems to hold true for peripheral lesions as well, but in this series, the number of cases with proven infection was too small to permit a final conclusion.

Zhuang and associates examined 22 patients with possible osteomyelitis (5 cases involving the tibia, 5 involving the spine, 4 involving the proximal femur, 4 involving the pelvis, 2 involving the maxilla, and 2 involving the feet) who underwent FDG PET and in whom operative or clinical follow-up data were available; FDG PET correctly depicted the presence or absence of chronic osteomyelitis in 20 of 22 patients. FDG PET led to correct identification all 6 patients with chronic osteomyelitis but produced 2 false-positive results.[42]

In the study by Zhuang et al, the final diagnosis was made at surgical exploration or clinical follow-up during a 1-year period. Six patients had chronic osteomyelitis, and 16 did not have osteomyelitis. This study had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 87.5%, and an accuracy of 90.9%. The authors concluded that FDG PET is a highly effective imaging method for excluding osteomyelitis when a negative scan is obtained. However, positive results are caused not only by osteomyelitis but also by inflammation in the bone or surrounding soft tissues as a result of other causes. Overall, FDG PET may prove to be the preferred study in the care of patients with possible chronic osteomyelitis.[42]

111 In leukocyte and99m Tc sulfur-colloid scintigraphy

Palestro and associates evaluated the role of combined leukocyte and marrow scintigraphy in the assessment of radiographically confirmed neuropathic or Charcot joints in 17 patients.[43] Studies demonstrating labeled leukocyte accumulation without corresponding activity on marrow images were classified as positive for osteomyelitis. Six patients also underwent 3-phase bone scintigraphy. Bone scans were interpreted as positive for osteomyelitis when focal hyperperfusion, focal hyperemia, and focal bony uptake were present on delayed images.[35, 43]

Bone images were also interpreted with labeled-leukocyte images by using 2 criteria for a positive study. One criterion was labeled-leukocyte activity in a region demonstrating abnormal activity on the bone scan, which was more intense than adjacent marrow activity or marrow activity in the corresponding region of the contralateral foot. The second criterion was either a spatially incongruent distribution of the 2 tracers or hyperintense activity on the leukocyte study, as compared with the bone scan.

The results showed that the leukocyte and marrow studies were positive for osteomyelitis in 4 of 20 neuropathic joints. Osteomyelitis was present in 3 joints, whereas in the fourth, infection was confined to overlying soft tissues. None of the 16 neuropathic joints with negative leukocyte and marrow scans were infected. In 1 patient who underwent below-the-knee amputation, histologic analysis confirmed hematopoietically active marrow, which corresponded to areas of congruent activity on the leukocyte and marrow images.

Three-phase bone scintigraphy was positive in all 6 neuropathic joints studied; osteomyelitis was present in 2. With the first criterion, leukocyte and bone imaging was also positive in all 6. With the second criterion, leukocyte and bone imaging was positive in the 2 infected neuropathic joints, as well as in 3 uninfected ones. Leukocyte and marrow scintigraphy was positive in both infected joints; it was negative in the 4 joints that were not infected.

The authors concluded that labeled-leukocyte accumulation in the uninfected Charcot joint does occur and is related, at least in part, to hematopoietically active marrow. They found that leukocyte and marrow scintigraphy to be a reliable way to distinguish between marrow and infection as the cause of labeled-leukocyte accumulation in the neuropathic joint. In their series, the combination of leukocyte scintigraphy and bone scintigraphy was superior to both 3-phase bone scanning and leukocyte scintigraphy.

Lichtenstein and associates examined 32 patients with fractures of the limbs 15-30 minutes after an injection of99m Tc sulfur colloid.[44] In 17 of 19 patients in whom osteomyelitis was superimposed on various fractures, significant uptake of sulfur colloid was noted at the fracture sites. The sensitivity for the test was 89.5%. In 12 of 13 cases in which osteomyelitis was absent, the sulfur colloid scan was negative, giving a specificity of 92.3%. Hence,99m Tc sulfur colloid scan may be a successful method for detecting osteomyelitis as a complication of a limb fracture.

Findings in chronic recurrent osteomyelitis

Bone scans may be positive for up to 2 years after treatment.111 In WBC scanning is not ideal because mononuclear cells predominate. Although the sensitivity of111 In WBC scanning in an acute infection is in the range of 100%, the sensitivity decreases to 73% in chronic disease.67 Ga scanning is probably more sensitive; with this method, activity returns to normal after effective treatment.

Findings in infected hip and knee prostheses

The clinical presentation of loose and infected prosthesis may be similar to that of osteomyelitis; hence, imaging plays an important role. Characteristically, MDP scans show normal flow and perfusion but increased focal activity at the tip or acetabulum in loosening. With infection, all phases are abnormal, and activity is present along the shaft of the prosthesis. A combined67 Ga and MDP scan may increase accuracy when67 Ga activity is more intense or incongruent.111 In WBC scans are probably better in evaluating infected prostheses.

Findings in diabetic foot

In the diabetic foot, neuropathic osteoarthropathy and cellulites may be confused with osteomyelitis. MDP scanning is sensitive but not specific.67 Ga scans are more specific. In this setting,111 In WBCs are superior scanning agents because there is no red marrow in the bones of the feet. Unlike MDP scans,111 In WBC scans are not positive in neuropathic bones or joints. The sensitivity and specificity have been reported to be 100% and 83-79%, respectively.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR  Consultant Radiologist and Honorary Professor, North Manchester General Hospital Pennine Acute NHS Trust, UK

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, British Medical Association, British Society of Interventional Radiology, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of the United States, Royal College of Radiologists, and Royal College of Surgeons of England

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Amilcare Gentili, MD  Professor of Clinical Radiology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Thornton Hospital; Chief of Radiology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

Amilcare Gentili, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Skeletal Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD  Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Javier Beltran, MD  Chair, Department of Radiology, Maimonides Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Robert M Krasny, MD  Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation

Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM  Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Carek PJ, Dickerson LM, Sack JL. Diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis. Am Fam Physician. Jun 15 2001;63(12):2413-20. [Medline].

  2. Hurtado-Nedelec M, Chollet-Martin S, Nicaise-Roland P, Grootenboer-Mignot S, Ruimy R, Meyer O, et al. Characterization of the immune response in the synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). Jun 17 2008;[Medline].

  3. Vavrík P, Jarošová K, Popelka S, Bek1 J. SAPHO Syndrome - Rare Case of Joint Damage Treated By Knee Synovectomy and Total Hip Joint Replacement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008;75(3):221-225. [Medline].

  4. Sato T, Indo H, Kawabata Y, et al. Scintigraphic evaluation of chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible in SAPHO syndrome. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. Sep 2001;30(5):293-5. [Medline].

  5. Alazraki NP. Radionuclide imaging in the evaluation of infections and inflammatory disease. Radiol Clin North Am. Jul 1993;31(4):783-94. [Medline].

  6. Demharter J, Bohndorf K, Michl W, Vogt H. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: a radiological and clinical investigation of five cases. Skeletal Radiol. Oct 1997;26(10):579-88. [Medline].

  7. Gold R. Radiographic diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Jun 1995;14(6):555. [Medline].

  8. Gold RH, Tong DJ, Crim JR, Seeger LL. Imaging the diabetic foot. Skeletal Radiol. Nov 1995;24(8):563-71. [Medline].

  9. Jurriaans E, Singh NP, Finlay K, Friedman L. Imaging of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Radiol Clin North Am. Mar 2001;39(2):305-27. [Medline].

  10. Kaim AH, Gross T, von Schulthess GK. Imaging of chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Eur Radiol. May 2002;12(5):1193-202. [Medline].

  11. Lobo J, McKee M. Musculoskeletal images. Chronic osteomyelitis. Can J Surg. Feb 2003;46(1):47-9. [Medline].

  12. Tehranzadeh J, Wong E, Wang F, Sadighpour M. Imaging of osteomyelitis in the mature skeleton. Radiol Clin North Am. Mar 2001;39(2):223-50. [Medline].

  13. Wiest PW, Hartshorne MF. Chronic osteomyelitis: clarification of nuclear medicine findings by fusion scans. Clin Nucl Med. Mar 2001;26(3):233-6. [Medline].

  14. Yang DC, Ratani RS, Mittal PK, et al. Radionuclide three-phase whole-body bone imaging. Clin Nucl Med. Jun 2002;27(6):419-26. [Medline].

  15. de Winter F, van de Wiele C, Vogelaers D, et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-position emission tomography: a highly accurate imaging modality for the diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. May 2001;83-A(5):651-60. [Medline].

  16. De Winter F, Vogelaers D, Gemmel F, Dierckx RA. Promising role of 18-F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in clinical infectious diseases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. Apr 2002;21(4):247-57. [Medline].

  17. Guhlmann A, Brecht-Krauss D, Suger G, et al. Chronic osteomyelitis: detection with FDG PET and correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology. Mar 1998;206(3):749-54. [Medline].

  18. Zhuang H, Alavi A. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in the detection and monitoring of infection and inflammation. Semin Nucl Med. Jan 2002;32(1):47-59. [Medline].

  19. Lopes TD, Reinus WR, Wilson AJ. Quantitative analysis of the plain radiographic appearance of Brodie's abscess. Invest Radiol. Jan 1997;32(1):51-8. [Medline].

  20. Madsen JL. Bone SPECT/CT detection of a sequestrum in chronic-infected nonunion of the tibia. Clin Nucl Med. Oct 2008;33(10):700-1. [Medline].

  21. Strobel K, Stumpe KD. PET/CT in musculoskeletal infection. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. Dec 2007;11(4):353-64. [Medline].

  22. Tanaka R, Hayashi T. Computed tomography findings of chronic osteomyelitis involving the mandible: correlation to histopathological findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. Feb 2008;37(2):94-103. [Medline].

  23. Darge K, Jaramillo D, Siegel MJ. Whole-body MRI in children: Current status and future applications. Eur J Radiol. Nov 2008;68(2):289-98. [Medline].

  24. Kattapuram TM, Treat ME, Kattapuram SV. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone and soft tissue infections. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis. 2001;21:190-226. [Medline].

  25. Kruskal JB. Can USPIO-enhanced spinal MR imaging help distinguish acute infectious osteomyelitis from chronic infectious and inflammatory processes?. Radiology. Jul 2008;248(1):1-3. [Medline].

  26. Ledermann HP, Kaim A, Bongartz G, Steinbrich W. Pitfalls and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging in chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(11):1815-23. [Medline].

  27. Schwegler B, Stumpe KD, Weishaupt D, Strobel K, Spinas GA, von Schulthess GK, et al. Unsuspected osteomyelitis is frequent in persistent diabetic foot ulcer and better diagnosed by MRI than by 18F-FDG PET or 99mTc-MOAB. J Intern Med. Jan 2008;263(1):99-106. [Medline].

  28. Tehranzadeh J, Wang F, Mesgarzadeh M. Magnetic resonance imaging of osteomyelitis. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1992;33(6):495-534. [Medline].

  29. Cleveland TJ, Peck RJ. Case report: chronic osteomyelitis demonstrated by high resolution ultrasonography. Clin Radiol. Jun 1994;49(6):429-31. [Medline].

  30. Larcos G, Antico VF, Cormick W, Gruenewald SM, Farlow DC. How useful is ultrasonography in suspected acute osteomyelitis?. J Ultrasound Med. Sep 1994;13(9):707-9. [Medline].

  31. Harvey J, Cohen MM. Technetium-99-labeled leukocytes in diagnosing diabetic osteomyelitis in the foot. J Foot Ankle Surg. May-Jun 1997;36(3):209-14; discussion 256. [Medline].

  32. Ivancevic V, Dodig D, Livakovic M, et al. Comparison of three-phase bone scan, three-phase 99m-Tc-HM-PAO leukocyte scan and 67-gallium scan in chronic bone infection. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;355:189-98. [Medline].

  33. Rachinsky I, Agranovich S, Lantsberg S. Imaging of bone to skin sinus tract from osteomyelitis of the femur by Tc-99m HMPAO leukocyte scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. Dec 2002;27(12):891-2. [Medline].

  34. Wolf G, Aigner RM, Schwarz T. Diagnosis of bone infection using 99m Tc-HMPAO labelled leukocytes. Nucl Med Commun. Nov 2001;22(11):1201-6. [Medline].

  35. Palestro CJ. The current role of gallium imaging in infection. Semin Nucl Med. Apr 1994;24(2):128-41. [Medline].

  36. Stokkel MP, Takes RP, van Eck-Smit BL, et al. The value of quantitative gallium-67 single-photon emission tomography in the clinical management of malignant external otitis. Eur J Nucl Med. Nov 1997;24(11):1429-32. [Medline].

  37. Schauwecker DS. Osteomyelitis: diagnosis with In-111-labeled leukocytes. Radiology. Apr 1989;171(1):141-6. [Medline].

  38. Datz FL. Indium-111-labeled leukocytes for the detection of infection: current status. Semin Nucl Med. Apr 1994;24(2):92-109. [Medline].

  39. Jacobson AF, Gilles CP, Cerqueira MD. Photopenic defects in marrow-containing skeleton on indium-111 leucocyte scintigraphy: prevalence at sites suspected of osteomyelitis and as an incidental finding. Eur J Nucl Med. 1992;19(10):858-64. [Medline].

  40. Oyen WJ, van Horn JR, Claessens RA, et al. Diagnosis of bone, joint, and joint prosthesis infections with In-111- labeled nonspecific human immunoglobulin G scintigraphy. Radiology. Jan 1992;182(1):195-9. [Medline].

  41. Meller J, Koster G, Liersch T, et al. Chronic bacterial osteomyelitis: prospective comparison of (18)F-FDG imaging with a dual-head coincidence camera and (111)In-labelled autologous leucocyte scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. Jan 2002;29(1):53-60. [Medline].

  42. Zhuang H, Duarte PS, Pourdehand M, et al. Exclusion of chronic osteomyelitis with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging. Clin Nucl Med. Apr 2000;25(4):281-4. [Medline].

  43. Palestro CJ, Mehta HH, Patel M, et al. Marrow versus infection in the Charcot joint: indium-111 leukocyte and technetium-99m sulfur colloid scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. Feb 1998;39(2):346-50. [Medline].

  44. Lichtenstein M, Andrews J, Scales R. Localization of osteomyelitis with 99mtechnetium sulphur colloid. Aust N Z J Surg. Aug 1983;53(4):339-42. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Sclerosing osteomyelitis of the lower tibia. Note the bone expansion and marked sclerosis.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Sequestrum of the lower tibia.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Image in a 56-year-old man with diabetes shows chronic osteomyelitis of the calcaneum. Note air in the soft tissues.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Radiograph (left) and isotopic bone scans (right) show sclerosing osteomyelitis of the tibia.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. This 24-year-old man with psoriatic arthropathy presented with pain over the first metatarsal bone, hallux, and heel, with increased plasma viscosity. Radiographs of the right foot show a normal first metatarsal bone, but the cortex of the proximal phalanx of the hallux is irregular. (See also the next 3 images.)
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans (perfusion component) show increased activity in the whole of the heel, the tarsus, the proximal and distal phalanges of the hallux, and the proximal phalanx of the second toe.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans (static component) show increased activity in the heel and in the first and second toes and in the fifth tarsotarsometatarsal joint.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Nonenhanced axial CT scans through the first and second toes shows cortical irregularity of the distal phalanx of the hallux; this finding is suggestive of chronic osteomyelitis. The final diagnosis was osteomyelitis of the first and second toes, plantar fasciitis, and psoriatic arthritis of the fifth metatarsal-phalangeal joint.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Plain radiographs show Garrès sclerosing osteomyelitis. (See also the next image.)
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans show increased activity in the region with Garrès sclerosing osteomyelitis.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. CT scans show vertebral osteomyelitis associated with a psoas abscess.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Chest radiograph of a 12-year-old patient presenting with pain and swelling of the left clavicle. Note the expansion, sclerosis, and periosteal reaction of the clavicle. (See also the next 3 images)
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Conventional tomograms of the left clavicle of the same patient as in the previous image show the inflammatory lesion in the clavicle more clearly.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) MRIs show bone marrow edema of the clavicle and periclavicular fluid (pus).
Osteomyelitis, chronic. T1-weighted nonenhanced (top) and gadolinium-enhanced (bottom) axial MRIs show the enhancement at the inflammatory site in the clavicle. (See also the previous 3 images.)
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Radiographs of the foot of a 52-year-old diabetic man with symptoms show no bone abnormality. (See also the next 2 images.)
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Radiographs of the foot of the same patient as in the previous image obtained 2 weeks later show patchy loss of bone density in the distal fourth metatarsal bone.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans of the same patient as in the previous 2 images show increased activity in the third and fourth metatarsal bones and in the third toe.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Indium-111–labeled WBC scans show an infected right-knee prosthesis.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. A 20-year-old patient underwent intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial fracture 2 years before presenting with a painful leg. Radiographs show no evidence of osteomyelitis. (See also the next 5 images.)
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Three-phase technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scans in the same patient as in the previous image and in the next 4 images show changes suggestive of osteomyelitis.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. This 69-year-old man presented with epigastric pain. Plain radiograph of the lumbar spine shows changes of osteoarthritis (see also the next 3 images).
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Axial CT scans show destruction of L1. Note the air in the soft tissues.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. Technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scan in the same patient as in the previous image and next image show increased activity in the upper lumbar spine.
Osteomyelitis, chronic. T1- and T2-weighted sagittal MRIs show bone marrow edema in L1 and obliteration of the disk space between L1 and L2. (See also the previous 5 images.)
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.