eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Musculoskeletal

Septic Arthritis: Imaging

Author: Larry Holder, MD, Residency Director, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Matthew Studley, MD, MPH, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Mar 22, 2007

Radiography

Findings

The earliest plain film radiographic findings are soft tissue swelling around the joint and a widened joint space from joint effusion. Displacement of adjacent fat pads may be present, especially in infants and children. With progression of the disease, plain films reveal joint-space narrowing as articular cartilage is destroyed. Loss of visualization of the white cortical line over large areas of the joint surface soon ensues as bone destruction begins to develop. This is followed by marginal erosions as uncovered, intracapsular bone is destroyed. Plain film findings of superimposed osteomyelitis may develop (periosteal reaction, bone destruction, sequestrum formation).

A triad of radiographic abnormalities known as Phemister triad is characteristic of tuberculous arthritis: peripherally located bony erosions, juxta-articular osteoporosis, and gradual narrowing of the joint space.

Gas within the joint or adjacent soft tissues can sometimes be seen in infection secondary to gas forming organisms such as E coli or Clostridium perfringens. However, gas within the joint is usually secondary to prior aspiration or vacuum phenomenon, which can occur secondary to limb traction during positioning for the examination or a recent dislocation.

Plain radiographic findings in the infant hip include obliteration of soft tissue planes, swelling, displacement of the fat pads, the obturator sign, and juxta-articular osteoporosis. Subluxation or dislocation of the femoral head secondary to intra-articular fluid can occur. However, this can be difficult to identify if the femoral head is not ossified.

In children, lateral displacement of the femoral epiphysis relative to the contralateral hip signifies a joint effusion. As little as 2 mm of asymmetry in the distance measured from teardrop of the acetabulum to the medial metaphysis of the femoral neck is considered pathologic.

Degree of Confidence

Initial plain radiographic findings are frequently normal. The characteristic findings are somewhat nonspecific by themselves, but they can be nearly diagnostic when correlated with the clinical picture.

False Positives/Negatives

Poorly defined bony erosions are characteristic of septic arthritis and a helpful feature in differentiating septic arthritis from other diseases in the differential diagnosis. Osseous erosions in gout, rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathies, pigmented villonodular synovitis, hemophilia, and synovial osteochondromatosis tend to be sharply marginated.

Computed Tomography

Findings

Although not commonly used for the evaluation of joint infections, CT scanning can be accurate in the evaluation of septic arthritis. CT scanning is very helpful when evaluating the sternoclavicular joint and the sacroiliac joint, which may be difficult to evaluate using plain films. CT scanning can depict early findings in septic arthritis, such as synovial thickening or joint effusion. Periarticular abscesses or fluid collections can also be identified.

CT findings are otherwise similar to those on plain radiographs and include joint effusion, joint-space narrowing, bone and cartilage erosions, gas within the joint, and soft tissue swelling.

Again, CT scanning can be used to guide joint aspirations in uncommon or difficult sites such as the sacroiliac or sternoclavicular joints.

Degree of Confidence

Some authors report that the sensitivity of CT is similar to that of MRI. However, joint aspiration should be performed in all cases of suspected septic arthritis, and it is the primary means of diagnosis.

False Positives/Negatives

Although associated findings of osteomyelitis or soft tissue abscess increase the specificity of CT, distinguishing septic arthritis from other diseases in the differential diagnosis may be difficult.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

While plain radiography should be the initial imaging study in patients with a suspected septic joint, MRI has been increasingly used to evaluate musculoskeletal infections, including septic joints. MRI is a sensitive and relatively specific imaging modality. A combination of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, short-tau inversion recovery, and postcontrast T1-weighted fat-suppressed series are most helpful. Synovial enhancement and the presence of a joint effusion have been reported to have the highest correlation with the clinical diagnosis of a septic joint. Perisynovial soft tissue edema is also commonly seen by MRI in patients with a septic joint. However, the absence of a joint effusion, especially in the small joints of the hands and feet, does not exclude infection of the joint.

Patients with tuberculous arthritis may have more bone erosions and less marrow-signal abnormality on MRI than patients with pyogenic arthritis. Use of intravenous gadolinium contrast is also very helpful in patients with a suspected septic joint to distinguish a periarticular abscess from surrounding myositis and to evaluate the degree of synovial inflammation.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist], gadobenate dimeglumine [MultiHance], gadodiamide [Omniscan], gadoversetamide [OptiMARK], gadoteridol [ProHance]) have recently been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). For more information, see the eMedicine topic Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy. The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or MRA scans. As of late December 2006, the FDA had received reports of 90 such cases. Worldwide, over 200 cases have been reported, according to the FDA. NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble

movingor straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness. For more information, see the FDA Public Health Advisory or Medscape.

Degree of Confidence

A clinically consistent history and the extra-articular findings of bone marrow edema or soft tissue inflammation are important in increasing the specificity of MRI for septic arthritis.

The sensitivity and specificity of MRI is increased in the setting of associated osteomyelitis. MRI is as sensitive as technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) scintigraphy in detecting osteomyelitis, and it is more sensitive than other scintigraphic techniques. It is excellent for the evaluation of soft tissues because of its high spatial resolution and multiplanar capability.

False Positives/Negatives

Infected and noninfected joint effusions have the same signal intensity characteristics and cannot be distinguished by using MRI.

On T2-weighted images, high signal intensity in the adjacent bone marrow helps in differentiating septic arthritis from synovitis. However, increased signal intensity does not necessary indicate osteomyelitis. It can be secondary to hyperemia due to the nearby infection or other etiologies. Thus, MRI is sensitive but not necessarily specific.

Ultrasonography

Findings

Ultrasonography is limited in the evaluation of septic arthritis. It is a sensitive modality for the detection of joint effusions in many anatomic locations. However, it is not reliable in characterizing the effusion or its cause. The thickness of the capsule and the echogenicity of the fluid are not good predictors of infection in the joint. Occasionally, ultrasonography can be helpful for guiding needle aspiration of the affected joint.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Early-phase (blood flow) and later (blood pool) images show increased activity at the joint and on both sides of the affected area. Delayed images obtained at 4-6 hours should demonstrate continued increased activity in the bone with associated osteomyelitis.

Decreased uptake in the femoral head can be seen with decreased perfusion related to high intra-articular pressures from the joint effusion.

Degree of Confidence

Scintigraphy with99m Tc MDP is extremely sensitive, though not specific, for septic arthritis. Three-phase bone scanning has a reported sensitivity of 90-100% and a specificity of 73-79% for osteomyelitis. These values are likely decreased in septic arthritis without associated osteomyelitis.

Newer agents such as indium In–labeled autologous white blood cells, leukocytes labeled with99m Tc hexamethyl propylamine oxime (HMPAO) labeled,99m Tc-labeled antigranulocyte monoclonal antibodies, and gallium-67 citrate have also been used to evaluate to septic arthritis and osteomyelitis with increased specificity. However,99m Tc MDP remains the mainstay of scintigraphic imaging.

A positively labeled white cell scan is specific. A positive 3-phase bone scan is specific if no other factors that could cause increased bone turnover are present. Thus, bone scanning is most useful if radiographic results are normal. If other factors (eg, trauma, arthritis) that could cause a false-positive bone scan are present, results should be confirmed with another study such as white blood cell scanning.

False Positives/Negatives

Any process that results in increased bone turnover (eg, trauma, nonseptic arthritis) can result in a false-positive finding. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy could cause uptake on both sides of a joint, but it can be differentiated by assessing the clinical history and by finding involvement of all the joints in the affected extremity rather than a single joint.

Angiography

Findings

Angiography has no practical role in the evaluation of septic arthritis.

More on Septic Arthritis

Overview: Septic Arthritis
Imaging: Septic Arthritis
Follow-up: Septic Arthritis
Multimedia: Septic Arthritis
References

References

  1. Alazraki NP. Radionuclide imaging in the evaluation of infections and inflammatory disease. Radiol Clin North Am. Jul 1993;31(4):783-94. [Medline].

  2. Beltran J, Noto AM, McGhee RB. Infections of the musculoskeletal system: high-field-strength MR imaging. Radiology. Aug 1987;164(2):449-54. [Medline].

  3. Bennett OM, Namnyak SS. Acute septic arthritis of the hip joint in infancy and childhood. Clin Orthop. Aug 1992;(281):123-32. [Medline].

  4. Greenspan A, Tehranzadeh J. Imaging of infectious arthritis. Radiol Clin North Am. Mar 2001;39(2):267-76. [Medline].

  5. Hong S, Kim S, Ahn J. Tuberculous Versus Pyogenic Arthritis:MR Imaging Evaluation. Radiology. 2001;218:848-853. [Full Text].

  6. Jacobson AF, Harley JD, Lipsky BA, Pecoraro RE. Diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the presence of soft-tissue infection and radiologic evidence of osseous abnormalities: value of leukocyte scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 1991;157(4):807-12. [Medline].

  7. Jaramillo D, Treves ST, Kasser JR, et al. Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in children: appropriate use of imaging to guide treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 1995;165(2):399-403. [Medline].

  8. Karchevsky M, Schweitzer M, Morrison W. MRI FINDINGS OF SEPTIC ARTHRITIS AND ASSOCIATED OSTEOMYLEITIS IN ADULTS. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY. 2004;182:119-122. [Full Text].

  9. Kirks DR. Practical Pediatric Imaging. 2nd ed. Lippincott-Raven;1998: 378-80.

  10. Lee SK, Suh KJ, Kim YW, et al. Septic arthritis versus transient synovitis at MR imaging: preliminary assessment with signal intensity alterations in bone marrow. Radiology. May 1999;211(2):459-65. [Medline].

  11. Miller TT, Randolph DA Jr, Staron RB, et al. Fat-suppressed MRI of musculoskeletal infection: fast T2-weighted techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. Skeletal Radiol. Nov 1997;26(11):654-8. [Medline].

  12. Morgan DS, Fisher D, Merianos A, Currie BJ. An 18 year clinical review of septic arthritis from tropical Australia. Epidemiol Infect. Dec 1996;117(3):423-8. [Medline].

  13. Resnik CS, Ammann AM, Walsh JW. Chronic septic arthritis of the adult hip: computed tomographic features. Skeletal Radiol. 1987;16(7):513-6. [Medline].

  14. Resnik D, Niwayaama G. Osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and soft tissue infection. In: Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders. Vol 4. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co;1988: 2571-86.

  15. Schattner A, Vosti KL. Bacterial arthritis due to beta-hemolytic streptococci of serogroups A, B, C, F, and G. Analysis of 23 cases and a review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). Mar 1998;77(2):122-39. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

infectious arthritis, pyogenic arthritis, pyogenic joint infections, nonpyogenic arthritis, non-pyogenic arthritis, nonpyogenic joint infections, granulomatous joint infections, bacterial arthritis, tuberculous arthritis

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Larry Holder, MD, Residency Director, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Matthew Studley, MD, MPH, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center
Matthew Studley, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Giuseppe Guglielmi, MD, Associate Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Scientific Institute Hospital
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

William R Reinus, MD, MBA, FACR, Professor of Radiology, Temple University; Chief of Musculoskeletal and Trauma Radiology, Vice Chair, Department of Radiology, Temple University Hospital
William R Reinus, MD, MBA, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physician Executives, American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Missouri State Medical Association, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, EdM, MBA, Professor, Department of Radiology, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, University of Washington
Felix S Chew, MD, EdM, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.