eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Musculoskeletal

Synovial Sarcoma: Follow-up

Author: Michael J Duh, MD, Associate Physician, Kaiser Permanente
Coauthor(s): Amilcare Gentili, MD, Clinical Professor of Radiology, University of California at San Diego; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Thornton Hospital; Sulabha Masih, MD, Associate Professor of Diagnostic Radiology, University of California at Los Angeles; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Section of Musculoskeletal Radiology, West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 13, 2007

Intervention

Diagnosis

Open biopsy is often difficult to perform, and the procedure is associated with an increased prevalence of complications such as anesthetic complications, unnecessary amputations, poor wound healing and breakdown, fracture, bleeding, and infection. Image-guided biopsy is now commonly performed for the initial histologic diagnosis of soft-tissue tumors16,17 because of the comparative ease, safety, and cost-effectiveness of this less-invasive procedure. Complication rates of percutaneous biopsies are as low as 1%, whereas those of open surgical biopsy are 2-20%.18

Reported accuracies of percutaneous techniques vary in the literature. One large study of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms revealed an accuracy of 93% for core-needle biopsy and 80% for fine-needle aspiration.

Because synovial sarcomas cannot be distinguished from other soft-tissue tumors, percutaneous biopsy techniques and considerations are no different from those for other soft-tissue masses. A potential but infrequent complication of biopsy includes intercompartmental contamination along the biopsy path with malignant tumor cells. Thus, the biopsy route should be discussed with the primary orthopedic surgeon to ensure that the needle tract can be easily incorporated in the eventual surgical resection.

Core biopsy can be easily performed by using a 14-gauge Tru-Cut needle (Travenol Laboratories Inc, Morton Grove, Ill) or similar device. Synovial sarcomas do not originate from bone; therefore, bone-cutting trephine-type needles are not needed. Fine-needle aspirations are performed with smaller 20- to 22-gauge needles.

In general, fine-needle aspiration is less accurate than other techniques for the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumors because of the lack of architectural information, smaller amounts of obtained tissue, and the need for specialized pathologic expertise in cytologic interpretation. Some authors report that fine-needle aspiration is adequate for the diagnosis of suspected metastatic disease, in which case the accuracy is high. Other authors advocate the use of both techniques in the percutaneous biopsy of soft-tissue tumors, stating that the information obtained is complementary and that many lesions are diagnosed by means of one and not the other. Accuracy rates for the diagnosis of lesions that are biopsied by both fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy are generally higher than those for either technique alone.

The choice of the imaging modality for biopsy guidance depends on the availability of the equipment, the expertise of the radiologist, and the characteristics of the lesion. CT scanning guidance is optimal for the biopsy of small lesions or those lesions that are near neurovascular bundles or other critical structures. Fluoroscopy is a real-time imaging modality that can be used for the biopsy of larger lesions that are easily seen on 2-dimensional radiographs. Ultrasonography can be used in select cases in which the lesion is more superficial and easily visible on real-time images.

The advantages of ultrasonography over CT scanning include the following: (1) continuous real-time visualization of the needle, (2) the ability to assess regions of viable tissue by using color-flow Doppler imaging, (3) the lack of ionizing radiation, (4) the availability of ultrasound scanners, (5) the reduced procedural time, and (6) overall cost-effectiveness. In some cases in which the tumor is not easily seen on CT scans or in which visualization of the tumor in several planes is desired, MRI-guided biopsy can be performed.

Treatment

Synovial sarcoma tumors are treated aggressively with limb-sparing therapy when possible. The recommended treatment is wide resection with negative margins, which often includes removing the surrounding muscle groups or total amputation. Resection is commonly followed by localized irradiation.

Multidrug adjuvant chemotherapy is currently recommended for systemic control of the cancer. However, although synovial sarcomas have been shown to be markedly chemosensitive, controversy exists over the actual survival benefit in patients.

 


More on Synovial Sarcoma

Overview: Synovial Sarcoma
Imaging: Synovial Sarcoma
Follow-up: Synovial Sarcoma
Multimedia: Synovial Sarcoma
References

References

  1. Murphey MD, Gibson MS, Jennings BT, et al. From the archives of the AFIP: Imaging of synovial sarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 2006;26(5):1543-65. [Medline].

  2. Nakajima H, Matsushita K, Shimizu H, et al. Synovial sarcoma of the hand. Skeletal Radiol. Nov 1997;26(11):674-6. [Medline].

  3. Ladanyi M. Fusions of the SYT and SSX genes in synovial sarcoma. Oncogene. Sep 10 2001;20(40):5755-62. [Medline].

  4. Fisher C. Synovial sarcoma. Ann Diagn Pathol. Dec 1998;2(6):401-21. [Medline].

  5. Ferrari A, Gronchi A, Casanova M, et al. Synovial sarcoma: a retrospective analysis of 271 patients of all ages treated at a single institution. Cancer. Aug 1 2004;101(3):627-34. [Medline].

  6. American Joint Committee on Cancer. What is cancer staging?. Available at http://www.cancerstaging.org/mission/whatiscs.html. Accessed July 11, 2007.

  7. Lewis JJ, Antonescu CR, Leung DH, et al. Synovial sarcoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 112 patients with primary localized tumors of the extremity. J Clin Oncol. May 2000;18(10):2087-94. [Medline].

  8. Hirsch RJ, Yousem DM, Loevner LA, Montone KT, Chalian AA, Hayden RE. Synovial sarcomas of the head and neck: MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 1997;169(4):1185-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  9. Jones BC, Sundaram M, Kransdorf MJ. Synovial sarcoma: MR imaging findings in 34 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 1993;161(4):827-30. [Medline][Full Text].

  10. van Rijswijk CS, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH, Bloem JL. Synovial sarcoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features. Skeletal Radiol. Jan 2001;30(1):25-30. [Medline].

  11. Rangheard AS, Vanel D, Viala J, et al. Synovial sarcomas of the head and neck: CT and MR imaging findings of eight patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. May 2001;22(5):851-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. Berquist TH, Ehman RL, King BF, Hodgman CG, Ilstrup DM. Value of MR imaging in differentiating benign from malignant soft-tissue masses: study of 95 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Dec 1990;155(6):1251-5. [Medline][Full Text].

  13. Spillane AJ, A'Hern R, Judson IR, Fisher C, Thomas JM. Synovial sarcoma: a clinicopathologic, staging, and prognostic assessment. J Clin Oncol. Nov 15 2000;18(22):3794-803. [Medline][Full Text].

  14. Van der Woude HJ, Vanderschueren G. Ultrasound in musculoskeletal tumors with emphasis on its role in tumor follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am. Jul 1999;37(4):753-66. [Medline].

  15. Lois JF, Fischer HJ, Mirra JM, Gomes AS. Angiography of histopathologic variants of synovial sarcoma. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). Jul-Aug 1986;27(4):449-54. [Medline].

  16. Torriani M, Etchebehere M, Amstalden E. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of bone and soft tissue tumors. J Ultrasound Med. Mar 2002;21(3):275-81. [Medline].

  17. Gil-Sánchez S, Marco-Doménech SF, Irurzun-López J, et al. Ultrasound-guided skeletal biopsies. Skeletal Radiol. Nov 2001;30(11):615-9. [Medline].

  18. Jelinek JS, Murphey MD, Welker JA, et al. Diagnosis of primary bone tumors with image-guided percutaneous biopsy: experience with 110 tumors. Radiology. Jun 2002;223(3):731-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  19. Andrassy RJ, Okcu MF, Despa S, Raney RB. Synovial sarcoma in children: surgical lessons from a single institution and review of the literature. J Am Coll Surg. Mar 2001;192(3):305-13. [Medline].

  20. Canale ST, Daugherty K, Jones L, eds. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 9th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1998.

  21. Dupuy DE, Rosenberg AE, Punyaratabandhu T, Tan MH, Mankin HJ. Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 1998;171(3):759-62. [Medline].

  22. Einhorn TA, Nielsen GP. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 1-2001. A 26-year-old man with a mass in the knee. N Engl J Med. Jan 11 2001;344(2):124-31. [Medline].

  23. Ilaslan H, Sundaram M. Advances in musculoskeletal tumor imaging. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 2006;37(3):375-91, vii. [Medline].

  24. Klijanienko J, Caillaud JM, Lagacé R, Vielh P. Cytohistologic correlations in 56 synovial sarcomas in 36 patients: the Institut Curie experience. Diagn Cytopathol. Aug 2002;27(2):96-102. [Medline].

  25. Kransdorf MJ. Malignant soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of diagnoses by age, sex, and location. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 1995;164(1):129-34. [Medline][Full Text].

  26. Matsuzaki A, Suminoe A, Hattori H, Hoshina T, Hara T. Immunotherapy with autologous dendritic cells and tumor-specific synthetic peptides for synovial sarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Mar-Apr 2002;24(3):220-3. [Medline].

  27. McCarville MB, Spunt SL, Skapek SX, Pappo AS. Synovial sarcoma in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 2002;179(3):797-801. [Medline][Full Text].

  28. Oda Y, Hashimoto H, Tsuneyoshi M, Takeshita S. Survival in synovial sarcoma. A multivariate study of prognostic factors with special emphasis on the comparison between early death and long-term survival. Am J Surg Pathol. Jan 1993;17(1):35-44. [Medline].

  29. Parkkola RK, Mattila KT, Heikkilä JT, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR-guided bone biopsy on a 0.23 T open imager. Skeletal Radiol. Nov 2001;30(11):620-4. Epub 2001 Sep 22. [Medline].

  30. Ruddy S, Harris ED Jr, Sledge CB, eds. Kelley's Textbook of Rheumatology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2001.

  31. Sandberg AA, Bridge JA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors. Synovial sarcoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Feb 2002;133(1):1-23. [Medline].

  32. Valenzuela RF, Kim EE, Seo JG, Patel S, Yasko AW. A revisit of MRI analysis for synovial sarcoma. Clin Imaging. Jul-Aug 2000;24(4):231-5. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

synovioma, lower extremity carcinoma, synovial cancer, cancer of the lower extremities, musculoskeletal tumor, cancer of the upper extremities, t(X;18) translocation mutation, SYT gene, SSX1 gene, SSX2 gene

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Michael J Duh, MD, Associate Physician, Kaiser Permanente
Michael J Duh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Amilcare Gentili, MD, Clinical Professor of Radiology, University of California at San Diego; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Thornton Hospital
Amilcare Gentili, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Skeletal Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sulabha Masih, MD, Associate Professor of Diagnostic Radiology, University of California at Los Angeles; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Section of Musculoskeletal Radiology, West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Sulabha Masih, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Skeletal Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

David S Levey, MD, PhD, Orthopedic/Spine MRI TeleRadiologist, Radsource, LLC
David S Levey, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Murali Sundaram, MBBS, FRCR, FACR, Consulting Staff, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM, Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

RELATED MEDSCAPE ARTICLES
News
Articles
 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.