eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Musculoskeletal

Metatarsals, Fractures: Imaging

Author: Prabhakar Rajiah, MD, MBBS, FRCR, Registrar, Department of Radiology, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals, UK
Coauthor(s): Shanmugam Karthikeyan, MBBS, MD, Dip Ortho, MRCS, Clinical Research Fellow in Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Oct 7, 2009

Radiography

Findings

Metatarsal fractures


<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. <U>Spiral fracture...

Fractured metatarsals. Spiral fracture through the distal shaft of the fifth metatarsal.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. <U>Spiral fracture...

Fractured metatarsals. Spiral fracture through the distal shaft of the fifth metatarsal.


<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Another fracture o...

Fractured metatarsals. Another fracture of the fifth metatarsal, oblique, in the shaft.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Another fracture o...

Fractured metatarsals. Another fracture of the fifth metatarsal, oblique, in the shaft.


<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Fracture at the ba...

Fractured metatarsals. Fracture at the base of the first metatarsal in a child.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Fracture at the ba...

Fractured metatarsals. Fracture at the base of the first metatarsal in a child.


<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. <U>Transverse frac...

Fractured metatarsals. Transverse fracture at the base of the fifth metatarsal in a male adolescent.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. <U>Transverse frac...

Fractured metatarsals. Transverse fracture at the base of the fifth metatarsal in a male adolescent.


<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Fracture of the di...

Fractured metatarsals. Fracture of the distal shaft of the third metatarsal.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Fracture of the di...

Fractured metatarsals. Fracture of the distal shaft of the third metatarsal.


<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Transverse fractur...

Fractured metatarsals. Transverse fracture at the base of the fifth metatarsal; this is a Jones fracture.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Transverse fractur...

Fractured metatarsals. Transverse fracture at the base of the fifth metatarsal; this is a Jones fracture.


An acute fracture is seen as a linear lucency and a break in the cortical surface. Nondisplaced impacted fractures may appear as an opaque line; such fractures may be confirmed on a different view.

Fractures may affect any metatarsal, but the fifth metatarsal is most commonly affected. The fracture may be transverse, oblique, or comminuted. Longitudinal linear fractures are extremely rare.

The 2 most common fractures in the fifth metatarsal are a fracture at the tip of the tuberosity and a transverse fracture 1.5-2 cm from the tuberosity; the latter is called a Jones fracture. Small avulsions derived from the tip of the base of the fifth metatarsal may be seen only in the oblique projection of the ankle.8

Stress fractures

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a thin...

Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a thin layer of subtle, solid periosteal reaction on the medial side of the shaft of the second metatarsal bone. This is an early stage of a stress fracture.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a thin...

Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a thin layer of subtle, solid periosteal reaction on the medial side of the shaft of the second metatarsal bone. This is an early stage of a stress fracture.


<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a <U>s...

Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a stress fracture more florid than that shown in the image of the stress fracture above (Image 22 in the Multimedia Section), with extensive periosteal reaction on either side of the third and fourth metatarsals.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a <U>s...

Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a stress fracture more florid than that shown in the image of the stress fracture above (Image 22 in the Multimedia Section), with extensive periosteal reaction on either side of the third and fourth metatarsals.


The radiographic findings of a stress fracture depend on the bone involved and the stage of disease. Radiographs are normal in the early stages of the disease; stress fractures appear as well-defined linear lucency or fluffy periosteal reactions by 7-10 days. The periosteal reaction is variable and is occasionally florid.

The head of the second metatarsal and, occasionally, the third metatarsal are commonly affected. The first metatarsal is injured in 10% of metatarsal stress fractures; such fractures involve a different kind of reaction (the endosteal variety), with liner sclerosis. Periosteal reaction is not common in this type of injury. One third of such fractures heal with only an intramedullary callus.

The base of second metatarsals may be affected in ballet dancers. The proximal aspect of the shaft of the fourth and fifth metatarsals is affected; the pattern is that of a linear lucency, which is slow to heal. Fractures in the sesamoid bones are also seen in ballet dancers.

Lisfranc fracture-dislocation

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a <U>L...

Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a Lisfranc fracture-dislocation: a fracture of the base of the second metatarsal and a lateral dislocation of the second metatarsal.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a <U>L...

Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a Lisfranc fracture-dislocation: a fracture of the base of the second metatarsal and a lateral dislocation of the second metatarsal.


<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a <U>L...

Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a Lisfranc dislocation with a fracture of the base of the third and fourth metatarsals.

<STRONG>Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a <U>L...

Fractured metatarsals. Image shows a Lisfranc dislocation with a fracture of the base of the third and fourth metatarsals.


A Lisfranc fracture-dislocation is a dislocation of the tarsometatarsal joints. Two types of Lisfranc dislocation have been described: homolateral and divergent.

In the homolateral type, all of the metatarsals are dislocated to one side. Usually, the second to fifth metatarsals are dislocated, but occasionally, all of the metatarsals are affected. Lateral displacement is more common than medial displacement.

A divergent dislocation is medial displacement of the first metatarsal and lateral displacement of the second to fifth metatarsals. A variant of this type is an isolated medial dislocation of the first metatarsal.

Lisfranc dislocations are associated with fractures of the base of the second metatarsal, fractures of the cuboid bone, fractures of the shaft of the other metatarsal bones, dislocations of the middle and medial cuneonavicular joints, and fractures of the navicular bone. The base of the second metatarsal is relatively fixed compared with the other metatarsal bones. Therefore, it is involved in both types.

This dislocation is overlooked in as many as 20% of cases if the alignment is not carefully evaluated. Lisfranc dislocations should be suspected if a gap of more than 5 mm is present between the bases of first and second metatarsals or between the medial and middle cuneiforms.

Degree of Confidence

Radiography is sensitive in the diagnosis of acute fractures.

False Positives/Negatives

Radiographs may not show stress fractures in the early stages and in as many as 50% of patients. In addition, nondisplaced fractures may be difficult to visualize. Associated ligamentous injuries and soft tissue changes are not depicted.

Computed Tomography

Findings

CT scanning is not essential for diagnosing metatarsal fractures. If CT is planned, it should be performed in at least 2 planes: the coronal plane (perpendicular to the sole of foot) and the axial plane (parallel to the sole). With modern multisection scanners, images may be acquired in 1 plane and reconstructed in other planes with a fairly high degree of resolution.

Images are usually acquired with 5-mm sections, but 3- and 1.5-mm sections may also be acquired; the thinner sections have better resolution. Coronal images are acquired with the patient in the supine position with knees flexed and feet flat on the table. The heels of both feet are superimposed in the lateral position. Longitudinal images are acquired with the patient in the supine position with knees extended and feet perpendicular to the table.

Degree of Confidence

CT scans often depict fractures that are not visualized on plain radiographs. They are useful in evaluating the following: comminuted fractures; intra-articular extension; soft tissue trapping, including that of tendons and muscle slips; underlying pathologic lesions, if any; displacement of the fragment in the axial plane; and bony complications.

CT is more sensitive than plain radiography in the detection of stress fractures. CT findings may also show stress fractures and early degenerative changes. MRI is the only modality that is more sensitive than CT, owing to its ability to depict soft tissue and joint structures.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

MRIs of the foot should include T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) images in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes.9,10,11,4,5,12,13

The fracture line is visualized as a linear hypointensity in T1- and T2-weighted images, whereas STIR images may show hyperintensity. Edema of the bone has low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Soft tissue swelling, ligamentous injuries, plantar-late injuries are visualized better on MRIs than on other images.

MRI is useful in the assessment of fractures and dislocations, soft tissue, the plantar plate, structures of the capsule, the extent of marrow hyperemia, the exact number of bones involved, and small chip fractures.

Degree of Confidence

Although MRI is sensitive for the diagnosis of fractures, it is not required because plain radiographic findings are fairly sensitive and specific.

MRI is more sensitive than radiography and even scintigraphy in the early diagnosis of stress fractures because it shows bone marrow edema exquisitely. MRI may be used to differentiate stress fractures from early degenerative changes and early stress fractures from synovitis.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Bone scanning is performed with the use of technetium methylene diphosphonate. Vascular flow and delayed images are obtained.14

Acute fractures are seen as foci of increased uptake in the affected bone. However, scintigraphy is not routinely indicated for the diagnosis of acute fractures. This study is performed if the clinical findings suggest a fracture but the plain radiographs are negative.

Degree of Confidence

Bone scanning is highly sensitive; its sensitivity is surpassed only by that of MRI in certain instances. For instance, MRI and CT are more sensitive than bone scanning for evaluating stress fractures because MRI and CT can depict bone marrow edema.

Fractures become evident on bone scans before they become evident on radiographs.

False Positives/Negatives

Bone scanning is not specific. Hence, its results should not be reported in isolation. A hot spot may be seen in fractures, degenerative areas, or neoplasms. Nuclear medicine images must be correlated with plain radiographs.

More on Metatarsals, Fractures

Overview: Metatarsals, Fractures
Imaging: Metatarsals, Fractures
Multimedia: Metatarsals, Fractures
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Quill GE. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. Apr 1995;26(2):353-61. [Medline].

  2. Singer G, Cichocki M, Schalamon J, Eberl R, Höllwarth ME. A study of metatarsal fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 2008;90(4):772-6. [Medline].

  3. Albisetti W, Perugia D, De Bartolomeo O, Tagliabue L, Camerucci E, Calori GM. Stress fractures of the base of the metatarsal bones in young trainee ballet dancers. Int Orthop. May 5 2009;[Medline].

  4. Banal F, Gandjbakhch F, Foltz V, Goldcher A, Etchepare F, Rozenberg S, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in early diagnosis of metatarsal bone stress fractures: a pilot study of 37 patients. J Rheumatol. Aug 2009;36(8):1715-9. [Medline].

  5. Raikin SM, Elias I, Dheer S, Besser MP, Morrison WB, Zoga AC. Prediction of midfoot instability in the subtle Lisfranc injury. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with intraoperative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 2009;91(4):892-9. [Medline].

  6. Chuckpaiwong B, Queen RM, Easley ME, Nunley JA. Distinguishing Jones and proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Aug 2008;466(8):1966-70. [Medline].

  7. Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones' fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle. Jul-Aug 1993;14(6):358-65. [Medline].

  8. Pao DG, Keats TE, Dussault RG. Avulsion fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal not seen on conventional radiography of the foot: the need for an additional projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 2000;175(2):549-52. [Medline].

  9. Crim J. MR imaging evaluation of subtle Lisfranc injuries: the midfoot sprain. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. Feb 2008;16(1):19-27, v. [Medline].

  10. Stoller D. Ankle and Foot. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins;1996: 568-9.

  11. Torriani M, Thomas BJ, Bredella MA, Ouellette H. MRI of metatarsal head subchondral fractures in patients with forefoot pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Mar 2008;190(3):570-5. [Medline].

  12. Macmahon PJ, Dheer S, Raikin SM, Elias I, Morrison WB, Kavanagh EC, et al. MRI of injuries to the first interosseous cuneometatarsal (Lisfranc) ligament. Skeletal Radiol. Mar 2009;38(3):255-60. [Medline].

  13. Gregg JM, Schneider T, Marks P. MR imaging and ultrasound of metatarsalgia--the lesser metatarsals. Radiol Clin North Am. Nov 2008;46(6):1061-78, vi-vii. [Medline].

  14. Jaukovic L, Ajdinovic B, Gardasevic K, Dopuda M. 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of stress fracture of the metatarsal bones mimicking oligoarthritis. Vojnosanit Pregl. Apr 2008;65(4):325-7. [Medline].

Further Reading

Clinical guidelines

Metatarsalgia/intractable plantar keratosis/Tailor's bunion.

Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery.  2000 (revised 2003 Sep).  7 pages.  NGC:003246
 
Diagnosis and treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint disorders.
American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.  2003 May-Jun.  43 pages.  NGC:003064
 
Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults - an evidence-based approach. Part 1: lower extremity disorders.
Canadian Protective Chiropractic Association - Professional Association
l'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières - Academic Institution.  2007 Dec.  34 pages.  NGC:006701

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® chronic foot pain.
American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society.  1998 (revised 2005).  7 pages.  NGC:004618

Clinical trials

A Double Blind Randomized Study on Adjunctive Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in the Treatment of 5th Metatarsal Non-Union Fracture

Related eMedicine topics

Metatarsal Stress Fracture

Lisfranc Fracture Dislocation

Stress Fractures (Orthopedic Surgery)

Stress Fracture (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation)

Fracture, Foot

Freiberg Infraction

Athletic Foot Injuries

Keywords

metatarsal fracture, metatarsus fracture, broken foot, Jones fracture, stress fracture of the foot, marcher's fractures, Lisfranc fracture dislocation, pseudo-Jones fracture, tennis fractures, dancer's fractures, pseudo-Jones fracture, tennis fracture, dancer's fracture, Lisfranc dislocation, Torg classification, Stewart classification, zonal classification, metatarsal stress fracture, foot stress fracture, marcher's foot

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Prabhakar Rajiah, MD, MBBS, FRCR, Registrar, Department of Radiology, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals, UK
Prabhakar Rajiah, MD, MBBS, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Radiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Shanmugam Karthikeyan, MBBS, MD, Dip Ortho, MRCS, Clinical Research Fellow in Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK
Shanmugam Karthikeyan, MBBS, MD, Dip Ortho, MRCS is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Leon Lenchik, MD, Director, Densitometry Minifellowship, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Medical Center
Leon Lenchik, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Theodore E Keats, MD, Professor, Departments of Radiology and Orthopedics, University of Virginia School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM, Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.