Updated: Oct 7, 2009
Fractures of the foot are common, and the metatarsals are among the bones most commonly fractured. Acute foot fractures of normal bones are usually caused by the dropping of heavy objects on the foot or as a result of stress associated with abnormal repetitive trauma. In deficient bones, insufficiency fractures may result from normal stress. (See Images 1-25 in the Multimedia Section.)
Acute fractures may be transverse, oblique, or comminuted (see Images below); they are easily recognized. Stress fractures are difficult to recognize in the early stages, when they are manifested only by a periosteal reaction. Bone scans are helpful in this situation. Recognition of fracture is crucial for guiding appropriate management and for preventing complications.1,2
Jones and pseudo-Jones, or tennis, fractures
A Jones fracture (see Image below) is caused by inversion of the foot, which produces tension on the peroneus brevis tendon and on the lateral cord of the plantar aponeurosis.6,7 In this type of fracture, significant displacement is absent. This type of fracture is more prone to nonunion.
Distal, or dancer's, fractures
Distal fractures, also called dancer's fractures, are caused by a rotational force resulting from axial loading with the foot in a plantigrade position.
Lisfranc dislocation
The Lisfranc joints are the tarsometatarsal joints. A Lisfranc fracture-dislocation (see Image below) is caused by falling from a height, falling down stairs, or stepping off a curb.
Mechanisms of injury are (1) rotation around a fixed forefoot (eg, falling from a horse with the foot caught in the stirrup) or (2) longitudinal compression of the foot. In this second mechanism, the metatarsal head is fixed. The weight of the body is on the hindfoot against the base of the metatarsals during rotation; these forces result in a distal dorsal dislocation of the metatarsal.
Stress fractures
Stress fractures (see Images below) are the result of abnormal stress on a normal bone. Stress fractures of the foot are also called marcher's foot because of the high incidence of occurrence in military recruits and in those who engage in heavy exercise for prolonged periods. This fracture is also common in ballet dancers, gymnasts, and athletes.3 Other predisposing factors include surgery, stress fractures in adjacent bones, neuropathic disease, and rheumatoid arthritis.
When a normal step is initiated, maximum force is placed on the head of the second or the third metatarsal. With increased activity, microinfarction takes place in the bones, resulting in a fracture.
Insufficiency fractures
Insufficiency fractures are the result of normal stress on a weakened bone. Such injuries are seen in people with osteoporosis; postmenopausal women are commonly affected.
Simple classification
Many classifications apply to fracture of the fifth metatarsal.
In a simple classification for fractures of the proximal end of the fifth metatarsal, fractures are classified as (1) those of the tuberosity and (2) those of the proximal metatarsal within 1.5 cm of the tuberosity.
Acute fractures, Jones fractures, and stress fractures may be described as (1) early fractures, (2) delayed union fractures, or (3) nonunion fractures.
Torg classification
The Torg classification is used for fractures within 1.5 cm of the metatarsal tuberosity. Type I includes fractures with sharp margins and no widening, sclerosis, periosteal reaction, or cortical hypertrophy. Type II includes fractures with widening, periosteal reaction, sclerosis, or both. Type III fractures involve widening, periosteal reaction, complete sclerosis at the fracture line, or both.
Stewart classification
The Stewart classification of fifth metatarsal fractures is as follows: type I, extra-articular fracture between the metatarsal base and diaphysis; type II, intra-articular fracture of the metatarsal base; type III, avulsion fracture of the base; type IV, comminuted fracture with intra-articular extension; and type V, partial avulsion of the metatarsal base with or without a fracture.
Zonal classification
The zonal classification, reported by Dameron, Lawrence, and Botte, categorizes metatarsal fractures by the region affected: zone 1 corresponds to the tuberosity, zone 2 corresponds to Jones fractures, and zone 3 is the diaphysis.
Metatarsal fracture has no racial predilection.
Metatarsal fracture has no particular sexual predilection.
Stress fractures are more common in adults involved in prolonged exercises, especially military recruits, runners, dancers, and gymnasts, than in other groups.
The base of the fifth metatarsal has a tuberosity that projects inferiorly in the plantar direction and attaches to the peroneus brevis tendon and the lateral band of the plantar fascia. The heads of the metatarsals articulate with the proximal phalanges of the corresponding digits.
The second metatarsal is the longest of all metatarsal bones; the first metatarsal is the shortest. Two sesamoid bones are present in the tendon of the flexor hallucis brevis, posterior to the first metatarsal bone.
Development of metatarsal bones
The primary centers of ossification of the metatarsal shaft appear by 9-10 weeks of intrauterine life. The epiphysis for the heads of the metatarsals appears by 3-4 years of postnatal life. The epiphysis at the base of the first metatarsal also appears by 3-4 years and unites by 18 years. Occasionally, the base of the fifth metatarsal has a separate secondary ossification center; this may be confused with a fracture.
Radiologic anatomy
The metatarsal bones and tarsal bones are connected by strong ligaments. Soft tissue support for the joints in the plantar aspect of foot is better than that in the dorsal aspect.
On the anteroposterior view, the lateral border of the first metatarsal should be aligned with the lateral border of the medial cuneiform. The medial border of the second metatarsal should be aligned with the medial border of the intermediate cuneiform bone.
On the oblique view, the medial and lateral border of the third metatarsal should be aligned with the medial and lateral borders of lateral cuneiform bone. The medial border of the fourth metatarsal should be aligned with the medial border of the cuboid bone. The fourth and fifth metatarsals are aligned with the cuboid bone, but the lateral part of the fifth metatarsal may project beyond the margin of the cuboid bone by up to 3 mm.
The distance between the base of the first and second metatarsals and the medial and intermediate cuneiform is more than the distance between other corresponding joints.
If a lateral image is obtained, a line drawn through the long axis of talus bone and the long axis of first metatarsal bone should be straight if there is no dislocation.
In a fracture of the fifth metatarsal (see Images below), pain and tenderness are present at the base of fifth metatarsal, along with swelling and ecchymosis; in addition, the patient experiences difficulty with weight bearing. This fracture is sometime hard to differentiate from an ankle injury because the swelling can be near the lateral malleolus.
Management depends on whether the injury is an acute fracture or a stress fracture and on whether it is displaced or not.
Avulsion fractures of the tuberosity are managed conservatively with non – weight bearing casts. Jones fractures are managed according to their Torg classification: Type I fractures are managed conservatively. Type II fractures are managed conservatively or with surgery. Type III fractures are associated with more complications and are usually managed surgically.
Anatomic variants
A secondary ossification center at the base of the fifth metatarsal (apophysis) may be seen in girls 9-11 years of age and in boys 11-14 years of age (see Image below). This center is always longitudinal and parallel (not transverse) to the base of the fifth metatarsal; this may simulate a fracture. The apophysis is longitudinally oriented and is smoothly corticated; these features differentiate it from a fracture at the same location.
The os vesalianum is an accessory ossicle proximal to the base of fifth metatarsal. This is seen in the peroneus brevis tendon.
Apophysitis
This is a nonspecific inflammation of apophysis at the base of the fifth metatarsal. Apophysitis is also called Iselin disease. On clinical evaluation, pain, tenderness, and swelling are noted at the base of the fifth metatarsal. This self-limiting condition occurs in adolescents. Radiographs show an irregular apophysis but no fracture.
Stress fracture
Stress fractures are the result of abnormal stresses on a bone in which there is normal mineralization. In the foot, these fractures are common at the head of the second and third metatarsals; they frequently occur in military recruits and in marchers. The injury manifests as a thin layer of periosteal reaction. If not treated in the early stages, the periosteal reaction becomes florid. In dancers, various bones may also be involved.
Insufficiency fracture
Insufficiency fractures are commonly seen in people with osteoporosis. The bones are osteopenic, and fractures may be seen through them.
Pathologic fracture
Pathologic fractures are secondary to bone lesions, including infections and tumors, such as metastases, lymphomas, plasmacytomas, bone cysts, lipomas, and osteoblastomas.
Osteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis of the foot is common in diabetic patients. Bone scanning is the most sensitive modality for detecting osteomyelitis; the disease appears as a hot spot in the involved bone.
Radiographs are positive within 7-21 days, by which time about 50% of the bone is involved. The earliest finding is soft tissue swelling with distortion of the normal fat planes in the soft tissue. A periosteal reaction appears along the surface of the bones. Lytic destruction of the bone occurs when the disease is established. In patients with diabetes, gallium scanning or white blood cell scanning may be performed to differentiate neuropathic joints from joints affected with osteomyelitis.
Freiberg disease
Freiberg disease is osteochondrosis involving the head of the metatarsals, usually the second and occasionally the third or fourth. Clinically, patients present with pain and tenderness. Radiographs show a flattened metatarsal head with increased opacity and occasional cystic lesions. In later stages, the joint is widened, and the head is sclerotic with a thick cortex.
Neuropathic joints
In the foot, neuropathic joints are commonly caused by diabetes. Other causes include syphilis and spinal cord diseases. Clinically, the foot is swollen and usually painless, though occasionally pain is present. Radiographs show destruction of the bone, with deformity, sclerosis, osteophyte formation, loose bodies, and dislocation.
Patients with diabetes may have associated vascular calcification. Soft tissue swelling and ulcers may also occur in the diabetic foot. Frequently, neuropathic joints coexist with osteomyelitis; a white blood cell scan is indicated for differentiating these conditions.
For patients with symptoms, proper history taking is essential to identify a suggestive mechanism of injury.
Physical examination commonly reveals signs and symptoms of swelling, tenderness, warmth, ecchymosis, limitation of movements, and an inability to bear weight.
Radiography is the first and often the only investigation required for the diagnosis of fractures. Radiographs may be used to diagnose all acute fractures, dislocations, and established stress fractures (see Images 1-25).
Bone scanning is more sensitive than plain radiography; it is indicated when a stress fracture or an acute fracture is suspected and radiographs are negative. Bone scanning is not a specific investigation.
Although MRI is more sensitive than radiography and bone scanning, it is used only for the assessment of soft tissue structures and ligamentous injuries. MRI is the most sensitive technique for imaging stress fractures of the foot; MRI may depict bone marrow edema even before increased uptake is seen on bone scans.
CT scanning is useful for finding avulsion fractures and comminuted fractures and to assess for intra-articular extension.
Small avulsions may be missed on radiographs. In the early stages of stress fracture, radiographs may be normal, or they may show only subtle periosteal reaction, which can be easily missed. Radiography cannot be used to assess soft tissue and ligamentous disruption.
Although CT and MRI are more sensitive than radiography, they are not cost-effective and are not indicated for the diagnosis of fractures.
Although bone scanning is sensitive, some stress fractures may go undetected in the early stages.
Ankle, Fractures
Metatarsals, Fractures
Stress Fracture
Anatomic variants
Apophysitis
Stress fracture
Insufficiency fracture
Pathologic fractures
Osteomyelitis
Freiberg disease
Neuropathic joints
Metatarsal fractures
An acute fracture is seen as a linear lucency and a break in the cortical surface. Nondisplaced impacted fractures may appear as an opaque line; such fractures may be confirmed on a different view.
Fractures may affect any metatarsal, but the fifth metatarsal is most commonly affected. The fracture may be transverse, oblique, or comminuted. Longitudinal linear fractures are extremely rare.
The 2 most common fractures in the fifth metatarsal are a fracture at the tip of the tuberosity and a transverse fracture 1.5-2 cm from the tuberosity; the latter is called a Jones fracture. Small avulsions derived from the tip of the base of the fifth metatarsal may be seen only in the oblique projection of the ankle.8
Stress fractures
The head of the second metatarsal and, occasionally, the third metatarsal are commonly affected. The first metatarsal is injured in 10% of metatarsal stress fractures; such fractures involve a different kind of reaction (the endosteal variety), with liner sclerosis. Periosteal reaction is not common in this type of injury. One third of such fractures heal with only an intramedullary callus.
The base of second metatarsals may be affected in ballet dancers. The proximal aspect of the shaft of the fourth and fifth metatarsals is affected; the pattern is that of a linear lucency, which is slow to heal. Fractures in the sesamoid bones are also seen in ballet dancers.
Lisfranc fracture-dislocation
In the homolateral type, all of the metatarsals are dislocated to one side. Usually, the second to fifth metatarsals are dislocated, but occasionally, all of the metatarsals are affected. Lateral displacement is more common than medial displacement.
A divergent dislocation is medial displacement of the first metatarsal and lateral displacement of the second to fifth metatarsals. A variant of this type is an isolated medial dislocation of the first metatarsal.
Lisfranc dislocations are associated with fractures of the base of the second metatarsal, fractures of the cuboid bone, fractures of the shaft of the other metatarsal bones, dislocations of the middle and medial cuneonavicular joints, and fractures of the navicular bone. The base of the second metatarsal is relatively fixed compared with the other metatarsal bones. Therefore, it is involved in both types.
This dislocation is overlooked in as many as 20% of cases if the alignment is not carefully evaluated. Lisfranc dislocations should be suspected if a gap of more than 5 mm is present between the bases of first and second metatarsals or between the medial and middle cuneiforms.
Radiography is sensitive in the diagnosis of acute fractures.
Radiographs may not show stress fractures in the early stages and in as many as 50% of patients. In addition, nondisplaced fractures may be difficult to visualize. Associated ligamentous injuries and soft tissue changes are not depicted.
CT scanning is not essential for diagnosing metatarsal fractures. If CT is planned, it should be performed in at least 2 planes: the coronal plane (perpendicular to the sole of foot) and the axial plane (parallel to the sole). With modern multisection scanners, images may be acquired in 1 plane and reconstructed in other planes with a fairly high degree of resolution.
Images are usually acquired with 5-mm sections, but 3- and 1.5-mm sections may also be acquired; the thinner sections have better resolution. Coronal images are acquired with the patient in the supine position with knees flexed and feet flat on the table. The heels of both feet are superimposed in the lateral position. Longitudinal images are acquired with the patient in the supine position with knees extended and feet perpendicular to the table.
CT scans often depict fractures that are not visualized on plain radiographs. They are useful in evaluating the following: comminuted fractures; intra-articular extension; soft tissue trapping, including that of tendons and muscle slips; underlying pathologic lesions, if any; displacement of the fragment in the axial plane; and bony complications.
CT is more sensitive than plain radiography in the detection of stress fractures. CT findings may also show stress fractures and early degenerative changes. MRI is the only modality that is more sensitive than CT, owing to its ability to depict soft tissue and joint structures.
MRIs of the foot should include T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) images in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes.9,10,11,4,5,12,13
The fracture line is visualized as a linear hypointensity in T1- and T2-weighted images, whereas STIR images may show hyperintensity. Edema of the bone has low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Soft tissue swelling, ligamentous injuries, plantar-late injuries are visualized better on MRIs than on other images.
MRI is useful in the assessment of fractures and dislocations, soft tissue, the plantar plate, structures of the capsule, the extent of marrow hyperemia, the exact number of bones involved, and small chip fractures.
Although MRI is sensitive for the diagnosis of fractures, it is not required because plain radiographic findings are fairly sensitive and specific.
MRI is more sensitive than radiography and even scintigraphy in the early diagnosis of stress fractures because it shows bone marrow edema exquisitely. MRI may be used to differentiate stress fractures from early degenerative changes and early stress fractures from synovitis.
Bone scanning is performed with the use of technetium methylene diphosphonate. Vascular flow and delayed images are obtained.14
Acute fractures are seen as foci of increased uptake in the affected bone. However, scintigraphy is not routinely indicated for the diagnosis of acute fractures. This study is performed if the clinical findings suggest a fracture but the plain radiographs are negative.
Bone scanning is highly sensitive; its sensitivity is surpassed only by that of MRI in certain instances. For instance, MRI and CT are more sensitive than bone scanning for evaluating stress fractures because MRI and CT can depict bone marrow edema.
Fractures become evident on bone scans before they become evident on radiographs.
Bone scanning is not specific. Hence, its results should not be reported in isolation. A hot spot may be seen in fractures, degenerative areas, or neoplasms. Nuclear medicine images must be correlated with plain radiographs.
Quill GE. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. Apr 1995;26(2):353-61. [Medline].
Singer G, Cichocki M, Schalamon J, Eberl R, Höllwarth ME. A study of metatarsal fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 2008;90(4):772-6. [Medline].
Albisetti W, Perugia D, De Bartolomeo O, Tagliabue L, Camerucci E, Calori GM. Stress fractures of the base of the metatarsal bones in young trainee ballet dancers. Int Orthop. May 5 2009;[Medline].
Banal F, Gandjbakhch F, Foltz V, Goldcher A, Etchepare F, Rozenberg S, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in early diagnosis of metatarsal bone stress fractures: a pilot study of 37 patients. J Rheumatol. Aug 2009;36(8):1715-9. [Medline].
Raikin SM, Elias I, Dheer S, Besser MP, Morrison WB, Zoga AC. Prediction of midfoot instability in the subtle Lisfranc injury. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with intraoperative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 2009;91(4):892-9. [Medline].
Chuckpaiwong B, Queen RM, Easley ME, Nunley JA. Distinguishing Jones and proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Aug 2008;466(8):1966-70. [Medline].
Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones' fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle. Jul-Aug 1993;14(6):358-65. [Medline].
Pao DG, Keats TE, Dussault RG. Avulsion fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal not seen on conventional radiography of the foot: the need for an additional projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 2000;175(2):549-52. [Medline].
Crim J. MR imaging evaluation of subtle Lisfranc injuries: the midfoot sprain. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. Feb 2008;16(1):19-27, v. [Medline].
Stoller D. Ankle and Foot. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins;1996: 568-9.
Torriani M, Thomas BJ, Bredella MA, Ouellette H. MRI of metatarsal head subchondral fractures in patients with forefoot pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Mar 2008;190(3):570-5. [Medline].
Macmahon PJ, Dheer S, Raikin SM, Elias I, Morrison WB, Kavanagh EC, et al. MRI of injuries to the first interosseous cuneometatarsal (Lisfranc) ligament. Skeletal Radiol. Mar 2009;38(3):255-60. [Medline].
Gregg JM, Schneider T, Marks P. MR imaging and ultrasound of metatarsalgia--the lesser metatarsals. Radiol Clin North Am. Nov 2008;46(6):1061-78, vi-vii. [Medline].
Jaukovic L, Ajdinovic B, Gardasevic K, Dopuda M. 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of stress fracture of the metatarsal bones mimicking oligoarthritis. Vojnosanit Pregl. Apr 2008;65(4):325-7. [Medline].
metatarsal fracture, metatarsus fracture, broken foot, Jones fracture, stress fracture of the foot, marcher's fractures, Lisfranc fracture dislocation, pseudo-Jones fracture, tennis fractures, dancer's fractures, pseudo-Jones fracture, tennis fracture, dancer's fracture, Lisfranc dislocation, Torg classification, Stewart classification, zonal classification, metatarsal stress fracture, foot stress fracture, marcher's foot
Prabhakar Rajiah, MD, MBBS, FRCR, Registrar, Department of Radiology, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals, UK
Prabhakar Rajiah, MD, MBBS, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Radiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Shanmugam Karthikeyan, MBBS, MD, Dip Ortho, MRCS, Clinical Research Fellow in Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK
Shanmugam Karthikeyan, MBBS, MD, Dip Ortho, MRCS is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Leon Lenchik, MD, Director, Densitometry Minifellowship, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Medical Center
Leon Lenchik, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Theodore E Keats, MD, Professor, Departments of Radiology and Orthopedics, University of Virginia School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Robert M Krasny, MD, Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM, Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Clinical guidelines
Metatarsalgia/intractable plantar keratosis/Tailor's bunion.
Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2000 (revised 2003 Sep). 7 pages. NGC:003246
Diagnosis and treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint disorders.
American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2003 May-Jun. 43 pages. NGC:003064
Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults - an evidence-based approach. Part 1: lower extremity disorders.
Canadian Protective Chiropractic Association - Professional Association
l'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières - Academic Institution. 2007 Dec. 34 pages. NGC:006701
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® chronic foot pain.
American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society. 1998 (revised 2005). 7 pages. NGC:004618
Clinical trials
A Double Blind Randomized Study on Adjunctive Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in the Treatment of 5th Metatarsal Non-Union Fracture
Related eMedicine topics
Metatarsal Stress Fracture
Lisfranc Fracture Dislocation
Stress Fractures (Orthopedic Surgery)
Stress Fracture (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation)
Fracture, Foot
Freiberg Infraction
Athletic Foot Injuries
© 1994-
by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)