eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Obstetrics/Gynecology

Encephalocele: Imaging

Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP, Chairman of Medical Imaging, Professor of Radiology, NGHA, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Coauthor(s): Ian Turnbull, MD, Lecturer, Department of Radiology, University of Manchester; Consulting Neuroradiologist, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester and North Manchester Hospital; Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute; Durre Sabih, MBBS, MSc, Visiting Faculty, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Applied Sciences and Nishtar Medical College, Director, Multan Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 21, 2008

Radiography

Findings

Cranial defects that are associated with encephaloceles usually occur in the midline of the skull and appear anywhere from the base of the nose to the base of the occipital bone.9,10,24 The skull defect is smooth and well circumscribed, with no associated increased opacity at the margin of the bone defect.

Degree of Confidence

Cranial defects occurring in association with encephaloceles have a nonspecific appearance. Moreover, plain radiographs rarely provide diagnostic information regarding the contents of an encephalocele.

False Positives/Negatives

Epidermoid and dermoid cysts, craniolacunia, parietal foramina, frontal fenestrae, fibrous dysplasia, wide sutures, cranial dysostosis (including cleidocranial dysostosis), and hypophosphatasia can mimic encephalocele-related cranial defects.

Computed Tomography

Findings

Although prenatal diagnosis of fetal encephalocele and its associated anomalies has been achieved by using computed tomography (CT) scans, the use of radiation for diagnosis in fetuses is discouraged, particularly in the first 2 trimesters.

  • Postnatally, CT scans provide an excellent depiction of the bony defect, particularly with coronal, sagittal, or 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. However, CT scanning is less capable than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in depicting soft-tissue components in an encephalocele.
  • Water-soluble contrast material that is placed in the theca and that flows into the encephalocele may allow better evaluation of the contents.
  • CT cisternography scanning often demonstrates a communication of the herniated sac with the intracranial subarachnoid space.
  • Attenuation measurements may be used to differentiate brain tissue from CSF in the herniated sac.
  • CT scans may be useful in the demonstration of associated intracranial anomalies, such as Chiari malformations, holoprosencephaly, Dandy-Walker complex, aqueduct stenosis, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and other midline abnormalities. MRI is considered superior to CT scanning in the analysis of these conditions.

Degree of Confidence

CT scanning is an excellent modality to use postnatally for depicting bony skull defects, particularly with 3D reconstruction. However, soft-tissue components of an encephalocele are not as well differentiated on CT scans as they are on MRI scans.

False Positives/Negatives

The differential diagnosis of an encephalocele includes an orbital apex, infection, trauma, and a nasopharyngeal, sinus, or temporal bone tumor. Infection and tumors usually show destruction of bone, and confusion is less likely to occur with the smooth, marginated cranial defect seen in an encephalocele. Benign tumors tend to cause bone erosion.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

Although US scanning has traditionally been the mainstay in fetal imaging, its resolution of the fine details of the brain and/or CNS is sometimes limited by the mother's body habitus, the surrounding amniotic fluid, and the position of the fetus. MRI may provide better detail in prenatal imaging. Fetal MRI requires fetal and maternal sedation. MRI appears to be an effective means of noninvasively assessing fetal CNS anomalies.12,25 Its advantages include the following:

  • The ability of MRI to resolve posterior fossa anatomy appears to be superior to that of US scanning.
  • Fluid-filled and/or CSF-filled structures are demonstrated well on MRI scans.
  • Postnatally, MRI is the examination of choice for the evaluation of an encephalocele. With the ability to depict the brain in multiple projections, MRI scans can provide exquisite detail of the cranial defect and the herniated contents.
  • Contents of the herniated sac may include CSF, disorganized brain tissue, and even ventricles. These are depicted clearly on MRI scans.
  • MRI can be useful in demonstrating associated intracranial anomalies, such as Chiari malformation, holoprosencephaly, Dandy-Walker complex, aqueduct stenosis, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and other midline abnormalities.

Degree of Confidence

Further experience with MRI may help to prove its true usefulness in analyzing fetal brain structures prenatally and vis-à-vis US scanning.

False Positives/Negatives

Postnatally, basal encephaloceles may be noted as masses protruding into the nasal cavity. They may mimic nasal polyps on CT and MRI scans. Because adenoids and nasal polyps are rare in infancy, the presence of a nasopharyngeal mass should alert the clinician to the possibility of a basal encephalocele.

Ultrasonography

Findings

  • The prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of an encephalocele is based on the demonstration of a cranial defect with varying degrees of brain herniation.2,3,4,5,6,7,8
  • The classic ultrasonographic appearance is that of a mass in the midline of the skull, with most cases occurring in the occipital and (less commonly) frontal regions.
  • The size of the bony defect can vary from a few millimeters upward, and the extruded sac can be small or can be larger than the fetal skull itself.
  • The mass may be purely cystic, or it can contain echoes from brain tissue.
  • Because skull ossification begins at 10 weeks' gestation, diagnosis is usually not possible before this time. The earliest reported diagnosis established by using a transvaginal scan was at 13 weeks' gestation. However, some have suggested that, starting at 9 weeks' gestation, the enlargement of the rhombencephalon cavity may indicate the presence of an encephalocele.
  • Most encephaloceles are covered with skin; therefore, they are more likely to be diagnosed with screening US scanning than with maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein testing.
  • The skull defect is identified in more than 80% of fetuses with an occipital encephalocele (75%). Associated findings may include a flattening of the basiocciput, an acute angle between the mass and skin line of the neck and occiput, ventriculomegaly, and a lemon sign (33%).
  • A cyst-within-a-cyst appearance is occasionally seen. This results from herniation of the fourth ventricle in the encephalocele surrounded by CSF.
  • A true frontal encephalocele is seen as an extrinsic mass near the dorsum of the nose, orbits, or forehead. Such encephaloceles are often associated with hypertelorism, midline craniofacial dysraphism, agenesis of the corpus callosum, interhemispheric lipoma, or heterotopias.18
  • Sphenoidal encephaloceles are usually clinically occult and appear in the first decade of life, when it is more appropriate to use CT scanning and/or MRI than it is to employ other modalities.
  • Frontal encephaloceles almost always contain brain tissue and involve the bridge of the nose (60%), as well as the nasal cavity (30%).
  • Parietal encephaloceles are associated with hydrocephalus, aqueduct stenosis, Arnold-Chiari malformation, microcephaly, and Dandy-Walker cysts.
  • US scanning may reveal a bony defect in the sphenoid bone that is associated with an overlying soft-tissue mass, but the mantle of the brain tissue in the encephalocele is often difficult to detect. In these cases, MRI is useful.

In one example of a fatal encephalocele, the encephalocele herniated through the clivus into the oropharynx. This appeared as a cystic mass that was surrounded by an echogenic rim protruding through the mouth. Ventriculomegaly and polyhydramnios were also noted. At delivery, airway intubation was not possible, and the baby did not survive.

Most parietal encephaloceles result from amniotic band syndrome, in which early disruption of skull development probably occurs. Encephaloceles that are secondary to amniotic bands are atypical, and their appearance is variable; moreover, they are usually not associated with other syndromes and/or genetic abnormalities.

Once an encephalocele is diagnosed, a search should be made for associated anomalies, such as Meckel-Gruber syndrome (which is characterized by an occipital encephalocele), microcephaly, cystic dysplastic kidneys, and polydactyly.9,10 Meckel-Gruber syndrome may be more easily diagnosed in the first trimester, when the amniotic fluid volume is usually normal. In the second trimester, oligohydramnios may hamper visualization of polydactyly and the encephalocele.

Walker-Warburg syndrome, which also is associated with encephaloceles, is a lethal complex of the CNS and eyes.26 The diagnosis is established by the detection of lissencephaly, hydrocephalus, and a cerebellar malformation. Recognizing these syndromes is important because they are autosomal recessive conditions. Because they can be recognized on prenatal US scans, targeted screening may be possible in the mother's subsequent pregnancies.

Degree of Confidence

US scanning remains the modality of choice for detecting prenatal CNS anomalies. To diagnose an encephalocele with certainty, a skull defect must be demonstrated. This is possible in 80% of fetuses with an encephalocele. Finding the defect may be difficult because of its small size; also, artifacts caused by shadowing may be present, and these can mimic a skull defect.

False Positives/Negatives

Occipital encephaloceles can be confused with a cystic hygroma, which has no cranial vault defect and contains no brain tissue.5 A high cervical meningocele also can mimic an encephalocele. A frontal encephalocele may be mistaken for a nasal teratoma; both conditions are rare, and the prognosis for each of them is poor.

The prenatal diagnosis of an epidermal scalp cyst simulating an encephalocele has been reported.22 Mimics of a parietal encephalocele include an ultrasonographic refraction artifact at the skull edge and a cloverleaf skull in which the temporal bone may be partially absent. An intra-oral salivary gland cyst can mimic a basal encephalocele.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Radionuclide ventriculography and/or cisternography have been used postnatally to demonstrate the intracranial extension of an encephalocele. Currently, MRI can effectively demonstrate this extension. Radionuclide cisternography can be performed via lumbar puncture or ventricular injection by using technetium-99m (99m Tc) diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (DPTA) followed by planar imaging or single-photon emission CT (SPECT) scanning.

Tsuboi and colleagues reported on a 66-year-old man with a parietal intradiploic encephalocele that manifested as dizziness.27 A lytic/destructive lesion of the right parietal bone was seen on a skull radiograph. CT scanning confirmed bone destruction associated with the right frontal lesion. A lesion in the parietal intradiploic space continuous with the right frontal lobe was observed with MRI. A biopsy was not considered because of the close proximity of the lesion to the central sulcus. SPECT scanning showed the same pattern of cerebral blood flow as that found in normal brain tissue, so diagnosis of an encephalocele was entertained.

On the basis of SPECT scanning and in the absence of symptoms and neurologic deficits, no surgical intervention was deemed necessary. The use of SPECT scanning, which proved instrumental in the diagnosis and management of this rare type of encephalocele, saved the patient from unnecessary surgery.

Angiography

Findings

Angiography may be needed to evaluate intracranial and extracranial vasculature before surgical repair is performed. Angiography is helpful if concern exists regarding the displacement of the dural venous sinus into the sac.

Degree of Confidence

Angiography remains the criterion standard for depicting vascular anomalies; however, cerebral angiography is rarely used in the evaluation of an encephalocele. MRI can usually depict the dural venous anatomy.

More on Encephalocele

Overview: Encephalocele
Imaging: Encephalocele
Follow-up: Encephalocele
Multimedia: Encephalocele
References

References

  1. Kumagai K. [Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system--from the pediatric standpoint]. No To Hattatsu. Mar 1991;23(2):177-82. [Medline].

  2. Bell WO, Nelson LH, Block SM. Prenatal diagnosis and pediatric neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1996;24(3):134-7; discussion 138. [Medline].

  3. Boyd PA, Wellesley DG, De Walle HE. Evaluation of the prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects by fetal ultrasonographic examination in different centres across Europe. J Med Screen. 2000;7(4):169-74. [Medline].

  4. Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, McGahan JP. Cephalocele detection in utero: sonographic and clinical features. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Feb 1995;5(2):77-85. [Medline].

  5. Goldstein RB, LaPidus AS, Filly RA. Fetal cephaloceles: diagnosis with US. Radiology. Sep 1991;180(3):803-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  6. Jeanty P, Shah D, Zaleski W, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal cephalocele: a sonographic spectrum. Am J Perinatol. Mar 1991;8(2):144-9. [Medline].

  7. Mernagh JR, Mohide PT, Lappalainen RE. US assessment of the fetal head and neck: a state-of-the-art pictorial review. Radiographics. Oct 1999;19 Spec No:S229-41. [Medline].

  8. van Zalen-Sprock RM, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP. First-trimester sonographic detection of neurodevelopmental abnormalities in some single-gene disorders. Prenat Diagn. Mar 1996;16(3):199-202. [Medline].

  9. Wininger SJ, Donnenfeld AE. Syndromes identified in fetuses with prenatally diagnosed cephaloceles. Prenat Diagn. Sep 1994;14(9):839-43. [Medline].

  10. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B. Associated malformations in cases with neural tube defects. Genet Couns. 2007;18(2):209-15. [Medline].

  11. Chen CP, Chern SR, Wang W. Rapid determination of zygosity and common aneuploidies from amniotic fluid cells using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction following genetic amniocentesis in multiple pregnancies. Hum Reprod. Apr 2000;15(4):929-34. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. Levine D, Barnes PD. Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology. Mar 1999;210(3):751-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  13. Oi S, Matsumoto S, Katayama K, et al. [New clinical phase in intrauterine diagnosis and therapeutic modalities of CNS anomalies]. No Shinkei Geka. Nov 1989;17(11):1029-35. [Medline].

  14. Köhrmann M, Schellinger PD, Wetter A, et al. Nasal meningoencephalocele, an unusual cause for recurrent meningitis. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurol. Feb 2007;254(2):259-60. [Medline].

  15. Dähnert W. Radiology Review Manual. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

  16. Arshad AR, Selvapragasam T. Frontoethmoidal Encephalocele: Treatment and Outcome. J Craniofac Surg. Jan 2008;19(1):175-183. [Medline].

  17. Bannister CM, Russell SA, Rimmer S. Can prognostic indicators be identified in a fetus with an encephalocele?. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Dec 2000;10 Suppl 1:20-3. [Medline].

  18. Brunelle F, Baraton J, Renier D. Intracranial venous anomalies associated with atretic cephalocoeles. Pediatr Radiol. Nov 2000;30(11):743-7. [Medline].

  19. Waller DK, Pujazon MA, Canfield MA, et al. Frequency of prenatal diagnosis of birth defects in Houston, Galveston and the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas 1995. Fetal Diagn Ther. Nov-Dec 2000;15(6):348-54. [Medline].

  20. Rankin J, Glinianaia S, Brown R, et al. The changing prevalence of neural tube defects: a population-based study in the north of England, 1984-96. Northern Congenital Abnormality Survey Steering Group. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. Apr 2000;14(2):104-10. [Medline].

  21. Gubbels SP, Selden NR, Delashaw JB Jr, et al. Spontaneous middle fossa encephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid leakage: diagnosis and management. Otol Neurotol. Dec 2007;28(8):1131-9. [Medline].

  22. Shahabi S, Busine A. Prenatal diagnosis of an epidermal scalp cyst simulating an encephalocoele. Prenat Diagn. Apr 1998;18(4):373-7. [Medline].

  23. Baykaner MK, Ergun E, Cemil B, et al. A mature cystic teratoma in pineal region mimicking parietal encephalocele in a newborn. Childs Nerv Syst. May 2007;23(5):573-6. [Medline].

  24. Haafiz AB, Sharma R, Faillace WJ. Congenital midline nasofrontal mass. Two case reports with a clinical review. Clin Pediatr (Phila). Sep 1995;34(9):482-6. [Medline].

  25. Mangels KJ, Tulipan N, Tsao LY, et al. Fetal MRI in the evaluation of intrauterine myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg. Mar 2000;32(3):124-31. [Medline].

  26. Martinez-Lage JF, Garcia Santos JM, Poza M, et al. Neurosurgical management of Walker-Warburg syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. Mar 1995;11(3):145-53. [Medline].

  27. Tsuboi Y, Hayashi N, Noguchi K, et al. Parietal intradiploic encephalocele--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). May 2007;47(5):240-1. [Medline][Full Text].

  28. Tulipan N, Hernanz-Schulman M, Lowe LH, et al. Intrauterine myelomeningocele repair reverses preexisting hindbrain herniation. Pediatr Neurosurg. Sep 1999;31(3):137-42. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

open neural tube, meningocele, brain parenchyma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP, Chairman of Medical Imaging, Professor of Radiology, NGHA, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of the United States, Royal College of Radiologists, and Royal College of Surgeons of England
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ian Turnbull, MD, Lecturer, Department of Radiology, University of Manchester; Consulting Neuroradiologist, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester and North Manchester Hospital
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute
Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Durre Sabih, MBBS, MSc, Visiting Faculty, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Applied Sciences and Nishtar Medical College, Director, Multan Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Harris L Cohen, MD, FACR, Vice Chairman/Associate Chairman (Research Activities), Director, Division of Body Imaging, Professor of Radiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine; Visiting Professor of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Karen L Reuter, MD, FACR, Professor, Department of Radiology, Lahey Clinic Medical Center
Karen L Reuter, MD, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Women Radiologists, American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Eugene C Lin, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.