eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Obstetrics/Gynecology

Encephalocele

Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP, Chairman of Medical Imaging, Professor of Radiology, NGHA, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Coauthor(s): Ian Turnbull, MD, Lecturer, Department of Radiology, University of Manchester; Consulting Neuroradiologist, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester and North Manchester Hospital; Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute; Durre Sabih, MBBS, MSc, Visiting Faculty, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Applied Sciences and Nishtar Medical College, Director, Multan Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 21, 2008

Introduction

Background

Encephalocele represents one end of the spectrum of open neural tube diagnoses.1 With ultrasonography (US) scanning, the diagnosis is based on the herniation of a spherical, fluid-filled structure, more correctly diagnosed as a meningocele or brain parenchyma (encephalocele) beyond the calvarial confines.2,3,4,5,6,7,8 The herniation occurs through a calvarial defect. The earliest reported ultrasonographic diagnosis was made at 13 weeks' gestation. Once an encephalocele is diagnosed, a thorough search for associated abnormalities should be performed.9,10

An encephalocele results from failure of the surface ectoderm to separate from the neuroectoderm. This leads to a bony defect in the skull table, which allows herniation of the meninges (cranial meningocele) or of brain tissue. The occiput is the most common site of this type of neural tube defect (75%) in the United States and Western Europe. Approximately 90% of cases involve the midline.

Other malformations and/or chromosomal anomalies are noted in at least 60% of patients with encephalocele.9,10,11 Currently, most cases are diagnosed prenatally.2,3,4,5,6,7,8,12,13  Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein levels are elevated in only 3% of patients, because most encephaloceles are covered with skin. Postnatally, infants may have associated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea and recurrent meningitis.14

See also the following related eMedicine topics:
Neural Tube Defects
Neural Tube Defects in the Neonatal Period

See also the following related Medscape topic:
Resource Center Spinal Disorders

Pathophysiology

The primary abnormality in the development of an encephalocele is a mesodermal defect resulting in a defect in the calvarium and dura that is associated with herniation of CSF, brain tissue, and meninges through the defect. The root cause of an encephalocele is the failure of surface ectoderm to separate from the neuroectoderm early in embryonic development. In the calvarium, induction of bone formation may be defective, or pressure erosion from an intracranial mass may occur. Defects at the skull base may be related to faulty closure of the neural tube or to failure of basilar ossification. Encephaloceles may be occipital (75%), fronto-ethmoidal (13-15%), parietal (10-12%), or sphenoidal. Fronto-ethmoidal encephaloceles are most common in Asia.15,16    

In terms of patient survival, the absence of brain tissue in the herniated sac is the single most favorable prognostic feature.17 Brain tissue in the herniated sac is usually apparent. However, it may be difficult to confidently exclude incorporated brain tissue in sacs that appear to be filled with CSF alone. Diagnosis is thought to be impossible before skull ossification, which starts at 10 weeks' gestation.

The earliest reported diagnosis was made at 13 weeks' gestation. The ultrasonographic appearance of an encephalocele is variable in the first trimester. Once an encephalocele is diagnosed, a search for associated anomalies, including intracranial and extracranial abnormalities (60-80%), should be performed.9,10,15  The risk of chromosomal abnormalities is 13-44%; therefore, karyotyping should be offered to the mother.11

Associated anomalies include findings associated with various genetic syndromes, such as Meckel-Gruber, von Voss, Chemke, Roberts, and Knobloch syndromes.9,10 In addition, findings may be related to nongenetic anomalies, such as cryptophthalmos syndrome, the presence of an amniotic band, warfarin use, maternal rubella, and diabetes. Other associated brain abnormalities that may occur in isolation or as part of genetic or nongenetic syndromes include spina bifida, agenesis of the corpus callosum, Arnold-Chiari II malformation, Dandy-Walker malformation, and brain migrational anomalies. The most common associated chromosomal anomaly is trisomy 18.

Occipital encephalocele is the most common form of encephalocele in the Western Hemisphere (71% in the United States). It is often associated with Dandy-Walker malformation and Arnold-Chiari II malformation. An occipital encephalocele may be high, above the foramen magnum, or it may involve the upper cervical spine and occipital bone. (The Chiari III malformation is a cervico-occipital encephalocele that contains most of the cerebellum.)

The frontoparietal encephalocele is the most common type of encephalocele in Southeast Asia. It is associated with midline craniofacial dysraphism.9,10,18 Sphenoidal encephaloceles are often clinically occult and usually become apparent at the end of the first decade of life.

See also the following related eMedicine topics:
Chiari I Malformation
Chiari II Malformation
Dandy-Walker Malformation
Meckel-Gruber Syndrome
Spinal Dysraphism/Myelomeningocele

Frequency

United States

There are 1-4 cases of encephalocele per 10,000 live births. In fetuses that have been spontaneously aborted before 20 weeks' gestational age, it is the predominant neural axis anomaly.5,15,19

International

The worldwide incidence of encephalocele is not known.20

Mortality/Morbidity

The development of an encephalocele reduces the chance of live birth to 21%, and only half of these live births survive. Approximately 75% of survivors have a mental deficit. Encephalocele recurs in 3% of patients after surgical repair, whereas the recurrence rate is higher in Meckel-Gruber syndrome (25%). The absence of brain tissue in the herniated sac is the single most favorable prognostic feature for survival.15,17

The prognosis for and treatment of a patient with an encephalocele depend on the site, size, and contents of the encephalocele.21 The ultimate outcome depends on the patient's karyotype and on his/her associated syndromes, as well as on the ease of surgical correction. A good prognosis is indicated for a patient who has an anterior encephalocele containing no brain tissue and who has no associated anomalies. Poor prognostic indicators include a large or posterior encephalocele and systemic anomalies. Patients with an anterior encephalocele have a 100% survival rate, but the survival rate decreases to 55% in persons with a posterior encephalocele. A nasal meningo-encephalocele is a rare cause of recurrent meningitis.

A prenatal diagnosis of an encephalocele should prompt a thorough search for other abnormalities.9,10 An accurate diagnosis is critical in determining the prognosis and in providing appropriate genetic counseling.

Race

Encephaloceles have a multifactorial etiology, and genetic and geographic factors have been implicated. Frontal encephaloceles are far more common in the Far East, particularly in the Chinese population, and are associated with a more favorable prognosis.

Sex

Encephaloceles occur more commonly in females than in males.

Age

Currently, most encephaloceles are diagnosed prenatally and present at birth.2,3,4,5,6,7,8,12,13  Some, particularly sphenoidal encephaloceles, may become apparent later in childhood.

Anatomy

An encephalocele results from a defective closure of the embryologic neural tube. The defect is believed to occur because of a failed closure of the rostral end of the neural tube during the fourth week of gestation. The defect causes an abnormality of the skull and underlying meninges. A spectrum of anomalies is seen, with the most mild being cranium bifidum occultum; this is analogous to spina bifida occulta.

A dermal defect is frequently present. An example is a dermal sinus leading from the cranial defect, which may also be associated with an intracranial dermoid cyst. Herniation of the meninges through the cranial defect is called a meningocele, whereas herniation of brain tissue and meninges through the bony defect is called an encephalocele.

Presentation

Most encephaloceles are diagnosed through routine prenatal US scanning.2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein levels are elevated in only 3% of patients, because most encephaloceles are covered with skin. Postnatally, infants may present with CSF rhinorrhea and recurrent meningitis. Postnatal presentation also depends on the associated malformations and the size and contents of the defect. As previously stated, approximately 75% of survivors have a mental deficit.

Preferred Examination

US scanning remains the mainstay of fetal imaging; there is evidence, however, that fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide superior detail of central nervous system (CNS) anomalies.

Differential Diagnoses

Branchial Cleft Cysts
Cystic Hygroma
Hemangioma
Myelomeningocele

Other Problems to Be Considered

Normal fetal hair
Scalp edema
Iniencephaly
Epidermal scalp cyst22
Cloverleaf skull
Iniencephaly
Teratoma (In a newborn, a mature cystic teratoma in the pineal region may mimic a parietal encephalocele.)23

In addition, a pituitary adenoma in association with a sphenoidal meningoencephalocele, although extremely rare, should be considered whenever a sellar tumor with cystic extension is encountered.  

Of these, encephalocele is the only condition associated with a calvarial defect. In most encephaloceles, other associated intracranial anomalies are present.

More on Encephalocele

Overview: Encephalocele
Imaging: Encephalocele
Follow-up: Encephalocele
Multimedia: Encephalocele
References

References

  1. Kumagai K. [Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system--from the pediatric standpoint]. No To Hattatsu. Mar 1991;23(2):177-82. [Medline].

  2. Bell WO, Nelson LH, Block SM. Prenatal diagnosis and pediatric neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1996;24(3):134-7; discussion 138. [Medline].

  3. Boyd PA, Wellesley DG, De Walle HE. Evaluation of the prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects by fetal ultrasonographic examination in different centres across Europe. J Med Screen. 2000;7(4):169-74. [Medline].

  4. Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, McGahan JP. Cephalocele detection in utero: sonographic and clinical features. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Feb 1995;5(2):77-85. [Medline].

  5. Goldstein RB, LaPidus AS, Filly RA. Fetal cephaloceles: diagnosis with US. Radiology. Sep 1991;180(3):803-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  6. Jeanty P, Shah D, Zaleski W, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal cephalocele: a sonographic spectrum. Am J Perinatol. Mar 1991;8(2):144-9. [Medline].

  7. Mernagh JR, Mohide PT, Lappalainen RE. US assessment of the fetal head and neck: a state-of-the-art pictorial review. Radiographics. Oct 1999;19 Spec No:S229-41. [Medline].

  8. van Zalen-Sprock RM, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP. First-trimester sonographic detection of neurodevelopmental abnormalities in some single-gene disorders. Prenat Diagn. Mar 1996;16(3):199-202. [Medline].

  9. Wininger SJ, Donnenfeld AE. Syndromes identified in fetuses with prenatally diagnosed cephaloceles. Prenat Diagn. Sep 1994;14(9):839-43. [Medline].

  10. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B. Associated malformations in cases with neural tube defects. Genet Couns. 2007;18(2):209-15. [Medline].

  11. Chen CP, Chern SR, Wang W. Rapid determination of zygosity and common aneuploidies from amniotic fluid cells using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction following genetic amniocentesis in multiple pregnancies. Hum Reprod. Apr 2000;15(4):929-34. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. Levine D, Barnes PD. Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology. Mar 1999;210(3):751-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  13. Oi S, Matsumoto S, Katayama K, et al. [New clinical phase in intrauterine diagnosis and therapeutic modalities of CNS anomalies]. No Shinkei Geka. Nov 1989;17(11):1029-35. [Medline].

  14. Köhrmann M, Schellinger PD, Wetter A, et al. Nasal meningoencephalocele, an unusual cause for recurrent meningitis. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurol. Feb 2007;254(2):259-60. [Medline].

  15. Dähnert W. Radiology Review Manual. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

  16. Arshad AR, Selvapragasam T. Frontoethmoidal Encephalocele: Treatment and Outcome. J Craniofac Surg. Jan 2008;19(1):175-183. [Medline].

  17. Bannister CM, Russell SA, Rimmer S. Can prognostic indicators be identified in a fetus with an encephalocele?. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Dec 2000;10 Suppl 1:20-3. [Medline].

  18. Brunelle F, Baraton J, Renier D. Intracranial venous anomalies associated with atretic cephalocoeles. Pediatr Radiol. Nov 2000;30(11):743-7. [Medline].

  19. Waller DK, Pujazon MA, Canfield MA, et al. Frequency of prenatal diagnosis of birth defects in Houston, Galveston and the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas 1995. Fetal Diagn Ther. Nov-Dec 2000;15(6):348-54. [Medline].

  20. Rankin J, Glinianaia S, Brown R, et al. The changing prevalence of neural tube defects: a population-based study in the north of England, 1984-96. Northern Congenital Abnormality Survey Steering Group. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. Apr 2000;14(2):104-10. [Medline].

  21. Gubbels SP, Selden NR, Delashaw JB Jr, et al. Spontaneous middle fossa encephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid leakage: diagnosis and management. Otol Neurotol. Dec 2007;28(8):1131-9. [Medline].

  22. Shahabi S, Busine A. Prenatal diagnosis of an epidermal scalp cyst simulating an encephalocoele. Prenat Diagn. Apr 1998;18(4):373-7. [Medline].

  23. Baykaner MK, Ergun E, Cemil B, et al. A mature cystic teratoma in pineal region mimicking parietal encephalocele in a newborn. Childs Nerv Syst. May 2007;23(5):573-6. [Medline].

  24. Haafiz AB, Sharma R, Faillace WJ. Congenital midline nasofrontal mass. Two case reports with a clinical review. Clin Pediatr (Phila). Sep 1995;34(9):482-6. [Medline].

  25. Mangels KJ, Tulipan N, Tsao LY, et al. Fetal MRI in the evaluation of intrauterine myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg. Mar 2000;32(3):124-31. [Medline].

  26. Martinez-Lage JF, Garcia Santos JM, Poza M, et al. Neurosurgical management of Walker-Warburg syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. Mar 1995;11(3):145-53. [Medline].

  27. Tsuboi Y, Hayashi N, Noguchi K, et al. Parietal intradiploic encephalocele--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). May 2007;47(5):240-1. [Medline][Full Text].

  28. Tulipan N, Hernanz-Schulman M, Lowe LH, et al. Intrauterine myelomeningocele repair reverses preexisting hindbrain herniation. Pediatr Neurosurg. Sep 1999;31(3):137-42. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

open neural tube, meningocele, brain parenchyma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP, Chairman of Medical Imaging, Professor of Radiology, NGHA, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of the United States, Royal College of Radiologists, and Royal College of Surgeons of England
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ian Turnbull, MD, Lecturer, Department of Radiology, University of Manchester; Consulting Neuroradiologist, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester and North Manchester Hospital
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute
Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Durre Sabih, MBBS, MSc, Visiting Faculty, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Applied Sciences and Nishtar Medical College, Director, Multan Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Harris L Cohen, MD, FACR, Vice Chairman/Associate Chairman (Research Activities), Director, Division of Body Imaging, Professor of Radiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine; Visiting Professor of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Karen L Reuter, MD, FACR, Professor, Department of Radiology, Lahey Clinic Medical Center
Karen L Reuter, MD, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Women Radiologists, American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Eugene C Lin, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.