Overview
Omphalocele is an anterior abdominal wall defect at the base of the umbilical cord, with herniation of the abdominal contents. The herniated organs are covered by the parietal peritoneum. After 10 weeks' gestation, the amnion and Wharton jelly also cover the herniated mass.[1, 2, 3, 4]
The etiology of omphalocele is not known. Various theories have been postulated; these include failure of the bowel to return into the abdomen by 10-12 weeks, failure of lateral mesodermal body folds to migrate centrally, and persistence of the body stalk beyond 12 weeks' gestation.[4]
Omphaloceles are associated with other anomalies in more than 70% of the cases; the severity of the associated anomalies determines the prognosis.[5] The mortality rate is 80% when associated anomalies are present, and it increases to 100% when chromosomal and cardiovascular abnormalities are present.[6, 7, 8, 9] Most associated anomalies are chromosomal.
The anomaly is usually detected during routine ultrasonographic surveillance, during an investigation of a disparity of uterine size with time from conception or other obstetric indications, or during an evaluation of an increased maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level. Omphaloceles and gastroschisis are two open, ventral wall defects that are detected by means of AFP measurement. Acetylcholinesterase levels may also be increased.[10]
Results of ultrasonographic studies suggest that in differentiating between normal physiologic herniation and a concern for omphalocele, one should note that physiologic midgut herniation should not exceed 7 mm in diameter and that physiologic herniation should not be apparent in fetuses with a crown-rump length greater than 44 mm.
Diagnostic amniocentesis is indicated when an omphalocele is suspected on antenatal sonograms.[11] The finding of an omphalocele should prompt a targeted ultrasonographic examination to search for associated anomalies. Fetal echocardiography and karyotyping should also be performed.[12]
Small omphaloceles occur with a rate of 1 case in 5000 live births. Large omphaloceles occur with a rate of 1 case in 10,000 live births.
Preferred examination
Ultrasonography is an inexpensive, safe, noninvasive real-time technique that is widely available. It remains the imaging modality of choice for the prenatal assessment of the fetus. In experienced hands, ultrasonography is highly accurate in the diagnosis of most complications associated with pregnancy. It is also used as a guide to intervention in pregnancy.
At present, the use of MRI in pregnancy is limited. As more experience is gained, fetal MRI may play a greater role in anomaly analysis. Prenatal MRI is at times a useful adjunct to ultrasonography and may enhance fetal anatomic evaluation when complex anomalies are suspected. MRI facilitates perinatal management and parental counseling.[13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]
Limitations of techniques
A significant regional variation in the ultrasonographic detection of fetal abdominal wall defects has been described in Europe.[19] This variation reflects differences in screening policies, equipment, and operator experience.[20]
The rate of selective termination still appears to be relatively high, even in cases of omphalocele, without other evident anomalies, which generally have a good prognosis. Although ultrasonography is an accurate and sensitive means for detecting fetal anomalies, it still has limitations, and its dependence on operator skill is a major disadvantage. The diagnostic problems with ultrasonography must be considered when couples are counseled about a possible fetal anomaly.
Besides the limited availability of MRI, its safety issues have not been completely resolved. Prudence currently dictates that MRI be used in the first trimester only if a clear medical indication is present and only when it offers a definite advantage over ultrasonography.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prenatal MRI enhances the fetal anatomic evaluation; it can be a valuable adjunct to ultrasonography before surgical intervention for selected life-threatening fetal defects. MRI helps in corroborating and refining the ultrasonographic diagnosis of complex fetal defects.
The prognosis and mortality rate in omphalocele is determined more by the presence of associated anomalies, such as cardiovascular and chromosomal defects, than by the omphalocele itself. Prenatal MRI can be used to screen for anomalies such as complex cardiac defects and nervous system anomalies.
Degree of confidence
The diagnostic accuracy of MRI has been reported to be superior to that of sonography in selected cases of cerebral malformations because of the high resolution of the soft tissues and because of its more global depiction of complex fetal disorders.
Unlike ultrasonography, MRI is not operator dependent. Imaging, however, is dependent on magnet strength and the pulse sequences chosen. The field of view obtained with MRI is larger than that obtained with sonography; the large field of view allows good anatomic orientation. MRI is not limited by maternal obesity or oligohydramnios. Fetal movement can make MRI difficult.
MRI is considered safe for the developing fetus. At present, no clinical or experimental evidence suggests that MRI causes teratogenic or other adverse affects during pregnancy, although a few studies in laboratory animals have shown that prolonged, high-level exposure to electromagnetic radiation might result in teratogenicity.
A recommendation from the National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference states, "MRI should be used during the first trimester pregnancy only when there are clear medical indications and when it offers clear advantage over other modalities."
False positives/negatives
The fine detail of internal structures of the abdomen and pelvis is not well demonstrated with fast T2-weighted sequences.
Ultrasonography
An omphalocele is diagnosed when a fetal anterior midline abdominal mass is demonstrated. The mass consists of abdominal contents that have herniated through a midline central defect at the base of umbilical cord insertion. The mean size of the defect is 2.5-5 cm. The image below depicts a mass with a smooth surface and contains abdominal viscera, usually the liver, bowel, and stomach.
Sagittal antenatal scan in a 13-week-old fetus shows an omphalocele-containing liver.
Sagittal antenatal scan on a 13- or 14-week-old fetus shows an omphalocele-containing liver. The covering of the mass, which comprises the peritoneum and amnion, may rarely rupture. The membrane is not always visible. Wharton jelly may be detectable as a hypoechoic lining between the layers of the covering of the membrane.
The umbilical cord attaches to the apex of the herniated mass, where the umbilical vein can be seen within the mass. The cord may be widened where it joins the fetal skin.
Fetal ascites is common and is seen within the herniated sac. Polyhydramnios, and occasionally oligohydramnios, may be present. Other major anomalies may be apparent in as many as 70% of cases.
A number of sonographic features differentiate an omphalocele from a physiologic midgut herniation, shown in the images below.
Axial sonogram through the mid abdomen of a fetus shows exteriorized bowel in relation to the anterior abdominal wall. Multiple loops of bowel are apparent. Because the bowel loops are not covered, they have irregular edges. L indicates the liver.
Axial sonogram through the mid to upper abdomen shows free-floating exteriorized bowel in relation to the anterior abdominal wall. S indicates the stomach; V, spine. A midgut herniation seldom exceeds 7 mm in diameter, whereas omphaloceles are much larger. Midgut herniation is invariably smaller in diameter than the abdomen, whereas the diameter of an omphalocele can be larger than that of the abdomen. The size of the omphalocele is best measured by using the ratio of the transverse diameter of the omphalocele to the transverse diameter of the abdomen. A midgut herniation seldom persists after 12 weeks of gestation or in a fetus with a crown-length measurement of more than 44 mm.
When the ratio of the diameter of the omphalocele to the transverse diameter of the abdomen is less than 60%, the lesion usually contains bowel and not liver.
The relative size of the omphalocele may decrease during pregnancy.
A measurement of the ratio of the transverse area of the lung to that of the thorax may be useful in predicting associated pulmonary hypoplasia in a giant omphalocele.[21] However, antenatal detection requires prolonged ventilation, which may be difficult and requires further study.[22, 23, 24, 25]
Degree of confidence
Ultrasonography is a sensitive technique, but it remains operator dependent. Its great advantage is that it can be quickly and frequently repeated as required. A definitive diagnosis of omphalocele is possible only beyond 12 weeks' gestation, when confusion with physiologic midgut herniation is no longer possible.
Investigators assessing the accuracy of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal anterior abdominal-wall defects reported a detection rate of 60%, with a false-positive rate of 5.3%.[26] In this study, sonographic examination was performed between weeks 16 and 22 in an unselected population. Fetuses with gastroschisis were incorrectly identified as having exomphalos in 14.7% of cases recognized before week 22. The diagnosis of associated, detectable anomalies was accurate in 71.6% of cases.
In a tertiary referral center, the detection of anomalous fetuses was shown to be significantly better with targeted ultrasonography than with routine ultrasonographic screening.[27]
False positives/negatives
An anterior abdominal-wall mass has a wide differential diagnosis. It may be difficult to differentiate between a midline omphalocele and physiologic midgut herniation in early pregnancy; it may also be difficult to differentiate omphalocele from bowel herniation of gastroschisis.[28]
Gastroschisis: Gastroschisis usually poses no problems of differentiation from an omphalocele. The only finding that the two share is that they both arise from the anterior abdominal wall. Gastroschisis has no membranous covering and usually presents with a ragged edge, which almost never contains liver. In addition, gastroschisis is typically right-sided, with the umbilical cord entering the abdomen to the left of the herniation (rather than on the herniation, as in an omphalocele). Spontaneous rupture of an omphalocele membrane may cause problems in differentiation, but this is so rare that it should seldom enter the differential diagnosis.
Physiologic bowel herniation: Physiologic herniation occurs at 10-13 weeks' gestation. The best method for differentiating this from an omphalocele is repeat sonography after 15 weeks' menstrual age. A large defect with liver exteriorized indicates an omphalocele at any gestational age.[29]
Umbilical hernia: Ultrasonography reveals a prominent bulge of the anterior abdominal wall that contains omentum and/or bowel. This may protrude into the umbilical cord. Amniotic-fluid AFP levels may be elevated when the bowel herniates into the umbilical cord.[30]
Extrophy of the urinary bladder: Sonographically, bladder extrophy may appear as an external, well-defined, solid or complex mass immediately superior to the fetal genitalia. Prolonged and repeated scans fail to reveal the fetal bladder. The renal collecting system and ureters need not be dilated, and unilateral or horseshoe kidneys may be found. Uterine and adnexal anomalies are relatively frequent. The pubis is abnormally wide, and the umbilical cord insertion may be abnormal.
Cloacal extrophy: Cloacal extrophy consists of a low omphalocele; bladder or cloacal extrophy; and frequently, other caudal anomalies, including meningomyelocele anal atresia and lower-limb anomalies. Most affected fetuses have a single umbilical artery. Ultrasonography usually shows a low, anterior abdominal mass below the umbilical cord; this is associated with absence of the urinary bladder.
Pseudo-omphalocele: During scanning of the fetal abdomen, pressure from the transducer may give an impression of an omphalocele, particularly during scanning in an oblique plane. The angle formed between such a pseudomass and the fetal abdominal wall is usually obtuse. A pseudo-omphalocele may also occur as a result of oligohydramnios or compression of the lateral thoracic wall from other causes. With medial compression of the lower thoracic wall, the abdomen may have an hourglass-like appearance when imaged in a transverse plane. Omphalocele associated with oligohydramnios is exceptionally rare.
Kilby MD, Lander A, Usher-Somers M. Exomphalos (omphalocele). Prenat Diagn. Dec 1998;18(12):1283-8. [Medline].
Langer JC. Fetal abdominal wall defects. Semin Pediatr Surg. May 1993;2(2):121-8. [Medline].
Weber TR, Au-Fliegner M, Downard CD, Fishman SJ. Abdominal wall defects. Curr Opin Pediatr. Aug 2002;14(4):491-7. [Medline].
Kurkchubasche AG. The fetus with an abdominal wall defect. Med Health R I. May 2001;84(5):159-61. [Medline].
Lunzer H, Menardi G, Brezinka C. Long-term follow-up of children with prenatally diagnosed omphalocele and gastroschisis. J Matern Fetal Med. Dec 2001;10(6):385-92. [Medline].
Boyd PA, Bhattacharjee A, Gould S, et al. Outcome of prenatally diagnosed anterior abdominal wall defects. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. May 1998;78(3):F209-13. [Medline].
Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Mantagos JS, et al. Morbidity in infants with antenatally-diagnosed anterior abdominal wall defects. Pediatr Surg Int. 2000;16(5-6):404-7. [Medline].
Fisher R, Attah A, Partington A, Dykes E. Impact of antenatal diagnosis on incidence and prognosis in abdominal wall defects. J Pediatr Surg. Apr 1996;31(4):538-41. [Medline].
van Eijck FC, Wijnen RM, van Goor H. The incidence and morbidity of adhesions after treatment of neonates with gastroschisis and omphalocele: a 30-year review. J Pediatr Surg. Mar 2008;43(3):479-83. [Medline].
Calzolari E, Bianchi F, Dolk H, Milan M. Omphalocele and gastroschisis in Europe: a survey of 3 million births 1980-1990. EUROCAT Working Group. Am J Med Genet. Aug 28 1995;58(2):187-94. [Medline].
Salvesen KA. Fetal abdominal wall defects--easy to diagnose--and then what?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2001;18(4):301-4. [Medline].
Getachew MM, Goldstein RB, Edge V, et al. Correlation between omphalocele contents and karyotypic abnormalities: sonographic study in 37 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 1992;158(1):133-6. [Medline].
Dykes EH. Prenatal diagnosis and management of abdominal wall defects. Semin Pediatr Surg. May 1996;5(2):90-4. [Medline].
Fogata ML, Collins HB 2nd, Wagner CW, Angtuaco TL. Prenatal diagnosis of complicated abdominal wall defects. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. Jul-Aug 1999;28(4):101-28. [Medline].
Heydanus R, Raats MA, Tibboel D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abdominal wall defects: a retrospective analysis of 44 cases. Prenat Diagn. May 1996;16(5):411-7. [Medline].
Toms AP, Dixon AK, Murphy JM, Jamieson NV. Illustrated review of new imaging techniques in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias. Br J Surg. Oct 1999;86(10):1243-9. [Medline].
Ouslati S, Hafsia D, Elfekih C, Maatki I, Ben Zineb N, Chaabane M. [Prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele: a report of four cases]. Tunis Med. Jan 2006;84(1):44-7. [Medline].
Schnur J, Dolgin S, Vohra N, Soffer S, Glick R. Pitfalls in prenatal diagnosis of unusual congenital abdominal wall defects. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21(2):135-139. [Medline].
Barisic I, Clementi M, Hausler M, et al. Evaluation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abdominal wall defects by 19 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2001;18(4):309-16. [Medline].
Martin RW. Screening for fetal abdominal wall defects. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Sep 1998;25(3):517-26. [Medline].
Kamata S, Usui N, Sawai T, Nose K, Fukuzawa M. Prenatal detection of pulmonary hypoplasia in giant omphalocele. Pediatr Surg Int. Oct 25 2007;[Medline].
Tseng JJ, Chou MM, Ho ES. In utero sonographic diagnosis of a communicating enteric duplication cyst in a giant omphalocele. Prenat Diagn. Jul 2001;21(7):540-2. [Medline].
Holland AJ, Ford WD, Linke RJ, et al. Influence of antenatal ultrasound on the management of fetal exomphalos. Fetal Diagn Ther. Jul-Aug 1999;14(4):223-8. [Medline].
Sen C. The use of first trimester ultrasound in routine practice. J Perinat Med. 2001;29(3):212-21. [Medline].
Chen CP, Chang TY, Liu YP, Tsai FJ, Chien SC, Tsao CM. Prenatal 3-dimensional sonographic and MRI findings in omphalocele-exstrophy-imperforate anus-spinal defects complex. J Clin Ultrasound. Sep 4 2007;[Medline].
Walkinshaw SA, Renwick M, Hebisch G, Hey EN. How good is ultrasound in the detection and evaluation of anterior abdominal wall defects?. Br J Radiol. Apr 1992;65(772):298-301. [Medline].
VanDorsten JP, Hulsey TC, Newman RB, Menard MK. Fetal anomaly detection by second-trimester ultrasonography in a tertiary center. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1998;178(4):742-9. [Medline].
McMahon CJ, Taylor MD, Cassady CI, Olutoye OO, Bezold LI. Diagnosis of pentalogy of cantrell in the fetus using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. Pediatr Cardiol. May-Jun 2007;28(3):172-5. [Medline].
Stepan H, Horn LC, Bennek J, Faber R. Congenital hernia of the abdominal wall: a differential diagnosis of fetal abdominal wall defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Mar 1999;13(3):207-9. [Medline].
Sherer DM, Dar P. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of congenital umbilical hernia and associated patent omphalomesenteric duct. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2001;51(1):66-8. [Medline].

