eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Pediatrics

Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation

Author: Gerald Mandell, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Oct 16, 2007

Introduction

Background

Ch'in and Tang first described cystic adenomatoid malformation (CAM) as a distinct entity in 1949.1 CAM is a developmental hamartomatous abnormality of the lung, with adenomatoid proliferation of cysts resembling bronchioles. CAM represents approximately 25% of all congenital lung lesions.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis and pathophysiologic features

CAM is believed to result from focal arrest in fetal lung development before the seventh week of gestation secondary to a variety of pulmonary insults. Depending on the time and type of insult, 4-26% of cases can be associated with other congenital abnormalities. However, arrest of pulmonary development with distortion of architectural differentiation may take place at any stage of embryonic development.

CAM differs from normal lung tissue because of a combination of increased cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis. A well-defined intrapulmonary bronchial system is lacking, and normally formed bronchi supplying the mass are absent.

Types of CAM

CAM is subdivided into 3 major types2 :

  • Type I lesions, the most common, are composed of 1 or more cysts measuring 2-10 cm in diameter. Larger cysts are often accompanied by smaller cysts, and their walls contain muscle, elastic, or fibrous tissue. Cysts are frequently lined by pseudostratified columnar epithelial cells, which occasionally produce mucin. Mucinogenic differentiation is unique to this subtype of CAM.
  • Type II lesions are characterized by small, relatively uniform cysts resembling bronchioles. These cysts are lined by cuboid-to-columnar epithelium and have a thin fibromuscular wall. The cysts generally measure 0.5-2 cm in diameter.
  • Type III lesions consist of microscopic, adenomatoid cysts and are grossly a solid mass without obvious cyst formation. Microscopic adenomatoid cysts are present.

CAM receives its blood supply from the pulmonary circulation and is not sequestered from the tracheobronchial tree. However, type II and III lesions can occasionally coexist with extralobar sequestration, and in such cases, they may receive systemic arterial supply. CAM may also occur in combination with a polyalveolar lobe. A polyalveolar lobe is a form of congenital emphysema with increased number of alveoli with normal bronchi and pulmonary vasculature. CAM usually occurs early in fetal life, whereas polyalveolar lobe occurs late.

Differential diagnosis

CAM is differentiated from other congenital cystic disease by 5 characteristics3 :

 

  • Absence of bronchial cartilage (unless it is trapped within the lesion) 
  • Absence of bronchial tubular glands
  • Presence of tall columnar mucinous epithelium
  • Overproduction of terminal bronchiolar structures without alveolar differentiation, except in the subpleural areas
  • Massive enlargement of the affected lobe that displaces other thoracic structures

Frequency

International

In Canada, the estimated incidence of CAM is 1 case per 25,000-35,000 pregnancies4 .

Mortality/Morbidity

The prognosis primarily depends on the size of the lesion. In a Canadian series of 48 patients, the incidence of postnatal demise was 10% (10 of 40 patients) with 8 spontaneous and voluntary abortions.4 Larger lesions have a higher incidence of mediastinal shift, vascular compromise, polyhydramnios, pulmonary hypoplasia, and hydrops, which may lead to intrauterine fetal demise or neonatal death (see PolyhydramniosPulmonary Hypoplasia, and Hydrops Fetalis). 

Type III CAM tends to be extensive and therefore tends to have a poor prognosis. The prognosis is also poor with bilateral lung involvement, prematurity, and severe associated malformations. The most commonly associated anomalies occur in the type II form. The anomalies affect the renal (cystic disease, agenesis, dysgenesis), intestinal (atresias), cardiac, and osseous systems.

  • When CAM is identified in utero, as many as 56% of the lesions detected can regress spontaneously, although they may initially progress. As the lesion decreases in size, mediastinal shift is corrected. Persistent lesions may only be discovered later in life, and some may be asymptomatic. Eventual removal of even asymptomatic masses is recommended because of potential risk of secondary infection and hemorrhage and because of reports of carcinomas arising in CAM.
  • In fetuses with life-threatening lesions, such as the development of hydrops, the anticipated mortality is nearly 100%.

Race

No clear racial predilection for CAM exists.

Sex

Sex-related incidences are equal for CAM.

Age

Most cases of CAM are diagnosed in the patient's first 6 months of life, with 70% of patients presenting in the first month of life. As many as 90% of cases are reported within the patient's first 2 years of life. Occasionally, CAM is discovered later in life, usually as a result of chronic or recurrent pulmonary infection.

When CAM was diagnosed prenatally in one study, the mean gestational age at diagnosis was 22.6 weeks ± 3.3.

Anatomy

Communication with the tracheobronchial tree usually is retained, and the vascular supply and venous drainage are to the pulmonary circulation, unless CAM is associated with sequestration, as discussed above. Lesions occur with equal frequency in the lungs, but the lesions have a slight predilection for the upper lobes. Lobar involvement is seen most often, but multiple lobes, the entire lung, or segments of both lungs may be involved.

Presentation

In the newborn, 80% of cases of CAM present with some degree of respiratory distress secondary to mass effect and pulmonary compression or hypoplasia. Severe symptoms may be related to air trapping within the lesions. The affected region is dull to percussion, and air entry is poor. Older patients may present with persistent or recurrent pneumonia.

Preferred Examination

CAM may be initially detected during prenatal ultrasonography. After birth, chest radiography should be performed first. Although lesions remain filled with fluid, postnatal sonography can be used for a more detailed assessment, particularly in type III lesions. Once lesions are air-filled, CT scanning is necessary for determination of the type and extent of the lesions.

Limitations of Techniques

Prenatal ultrasonography is accurate in diagnosing CAM. Prenatally diagnosed lesions may be asymptomatic at birth (71%), and they have normal radiographic findings (57%). A concurrent sequestration may not be identified. Usually, radiographic findings are apparent in a symptomatic individual, but they may not be as apparent in an asymptomatic child.

Most often, the diagnosis can be made by using plain radiographs. CT scans may be used to diagnose confusing cases. Overlapping CT features exist among cases of CAM, pulmonary sequestration, bronchogenic cyst, and other foregut malformations. CT is more accurate than radiography or ultrasonography in classifying the type of CAM.

Differential Diagnoses

Bronchogenic Cyst
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Congenital Lobar Emphysema
Pulmonary Interstitial Emphysema
Pulmonary Sequestration

Other Problems to Be Considered

Postinfectious pneumatoceles

More on Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation

Overview: Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation
Imaging: Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation
Follow-up: Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation
Multimedia: Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation
References

References

  1. Ch'in KT, Tang MY. Congenital adenomatoid malformation of one lobe of lung with general anasarca. Arch Path. 1949;48:221-9.

  2. Stocker JT, Madewell JE, Drake RM. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Classification and morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol. Mar 1977;8(2):155-71. [Medline].

  3. Bunduki V, Ruano R, da Silva MM, et al. Prognostic factors associated with congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Prenat Diagn. Jun 2000;20(6):459-64. [Medline].

  4. Laberge JM, Flageole H, Pugash D, et al. Outcome of the prenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid lung malformation: a Canadian experience. Fetal Diagn Ther. May-Jun 2001;16(3):178-86. [Medline].

  5. Kim WS, Lee KS, Kim IO, et al. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung: CT-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 1997;168(1):47-53. [Medline].

  6. Patz EF Jr, Muller NL, Swensen SJ. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation in adults: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. May-Jun 1995;19(3):361-4. [Medline].

  7. Oh BJ, Lee JS, Kim JS, Lim CM, Koh Y. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung in adults: clinical and CT evaluation of seven patients. Respirology. Jul 2006;11(4):496-501. [Medline].

  8. Hubbard AM, Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM, et al. Congenital chest lesions: diagnosis and characterization with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology. Jul 1999;212(1):43-8. [Medline].

  9. Hubbard AM, States LJ. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. Apr 2001;12(2):93-103. [Medline].

  10. Fitzgerald DA. Congenital cyst adenomatoid malformations: resect some and observe all?. Paediatr Respir Rev. Mar 2007;8(1):67-76. [Medline].

  11. Calvert JK, Lakhoo K. Antenatally suspected congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung: postnatal investigation and timing of surgery. J Pediatr Surg. Feb 2007;42(2):411-4. [Medline].

  12. Bain GO. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Dis Chest. 1959;36:430-3.

  13. Cass DL, Crombleholme TM, Howell LJ, et al. Cystic lung lesions with systemic arterial blood supply: a hybrid of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation and bronchopulmonary sequestration. J Pediatr Surg. Jul 1997;32(7):986-90. [Medline].

  14. Cass DL, Quinn TM, Yang EY, et al. Increased cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis characterize congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg. Jul 1998;33(7):1043-6; discussion 1047. [Medline].

  15. Chow PC, Lee SL, Tang MH, Chan KL, Lee CP, Lam BC. Management and outcome of antenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Hong Kong Med J. Feb 2007;13(1):31-9. [Medline].

  16. Harmath A, Csaba A, Hauzman E, Hajdú J, Pete B, Papp Z. Congenital lung malformations in the second trimester: prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings. J Clin Ultrasound. Jun 2007;35(5):250-5. [Medline].

  17. Hubbard AM, Crombleholme TM. Anomalies and malformations affecting the fetal/neonatal chest. Semin Roentgenol. Apr 1998;33(2):117-25. [Medline].

  18. Kamata S, Usui N, Kamiyama M, Nose K, Sawai T, Fukuzawa M. Long-term outcome in patients with prenatally diagnosed cystic lung disease: special reference to ventilation and perfusion scan in the affected lung. J Pediatr Surg. Dec 2006;41(12):2023-7. [Medline].

  19. Marshall KW, Blane CE, Teitelbaum DH, van Leeuwen K. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation: impact of prenatal diagnosis and changing strategies in the treatment of the asymptomatic patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Dec 2000;175(6):1551-4. [Medline].

  20. Miller RK, Sieber WK, Yunis EJ. Congenital adenomatoid malformation of the lung. A report of 17 cases and review of the literature. Pathol Annu. 1980;15(Pt 1):387-402. [Medline].

  21. Panicek DM, Heitzman ER, Randall PA, et al. The continuum of pulmonary developmental anomalies. Radiographics. Jul 1987;7(4):747-72. [Medline].

  22. Ribet ME, Copin MC, Soots JG, Gosselin BH. Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. Ann Thorac Surg. Oct 1995;60(4):1126-8. [Medline].

  23. Uroz-Tristan J, Cabrera-Roca G, Wiehoff-Neumann A, et al. Bilateral and multilobar cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Dec 1998;8(6):364-7. [Medline].

  24. van Leeuwen K, Teitelbaum DH, Hirschl RB, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation and its postnatal presentation, surgical indications, and natural history. J Pediatr Surg. May 1999;34(5):794-8; discussion 798-9. [Medline].

  25. Wagenvoort CA, Zondervan PE. Polyalveolar lobe and congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation type II: are they related?. Pediatr Pathol. Mar-Apr 1991;11(2):311-20. [Medline].

  26. Winters WD, Effmann EL, Nghiem HV, Nyberg DA. Disappearing fetal lung masses: importance of postnatal imaging studies. Pediatr Radiol. Jun 1997;27(6):535-9. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

CAM, congenital adenomatoid malformation, congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation, developmental hamartomatous abnormality, adenomatoid cysts, fetal lung development

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Gerald Mandell, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital
Gerald Mandell, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Angiology, American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Nuclear Physicians, American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

S Bruce Greenberg, MD, Professor of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital
S Bruce Greenberg, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Marta Hernanz-Schulman, MD, FAAP, Professor, Radiology, Radiological Sciences, and Pediatrics, Director, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Radiologist-in-Chief, Director, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital
Marta Hernanz-Schulman, MD, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and American Roentgen Ray Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Karani, MBBS, FRCR, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.