eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Pediatrics

Midgut Volvulus: Imaging

Author: Janet R Reid, MD, FRCP(C), Associate Professor of Radiology, Section Head of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital of Cleveland Clinic
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 27, 2007

Radiography

Findings

Abdominal radiographs are frequently performed in children with abdominal symptoms. In cases of simple malrotation, radiographs may appear normal.

In midgut volvulus, the classic radiographic finding is a partial duodenal obstruction (dilation of both the stomach and proximal duodenum, with a small amount of distal bowel gas). Complete obstruction of the duodenum may also be found. Less frequent, but more ominous, signs are a gasless abdomen, ileus, or a distal small bowel obstruction with multiple dilated loops and air-fluid levels. A normal abdominal film does not exclude malrotation.

An upper GI series is the preferred diagnostic test for malrotation with midgut volvulus and must be performed, unless a delay in surgical treatment will compromise outcome (as in the case of a moribund child). The upper GI series is performed with barium administered either orally or through a nasogastric tube. The normal DJJ lies to the left of the left-sided spinal pedicle at the level of the duodenal bulb on a true frontal view. The duodenal C-sweep courses posteriorly, inferiorly, anteriorly, and then superiorly.

The findings of a malrotation on upper GI series include the following:

  • The DJJ is displaced downward and to the right on frontal view.  
  • The duodenum has an abnormal course on lateral view.  
  • Abnormal positioning of the jejunum (lying on right side of abdomen) should alert the physician to the possibility of a malrotation, but this finding should not be relied upon to either make or exclude the diagnosis.

In malrotation with midgut volvulus, the findings also include the following:

  • A dilated, fluid-filled duodenum  
  • A proximal small bowel obstruction  
  • A "corkscrew" pattern (proximal jejunum spiraling downward in the right- or mid-upper abdomen in midgut volvulus, which is rare) (see Image 6)  
  • Mural edema and thick folds

Degree of Confidence

In malrotation without midgut volvulus, the degree of confidence on plain radiographs is low. Radiographs are rarely normal in malrotation with midgut volvulus, increasing the degree of confidence in this clinical scenario.

An upper GI series provides a high degree of confidence in the diagnosis of malrotation with midgut volvulus.

False Positives/Negatives

Radiographic false negatives: Normal radiographs are common with malrotation.

Radiographic false positives:

  • Findings in midgut volvulus are nonspecific and can be seen in other conditions that may cause ileus or ischemia, such as acute pyelonephritis, appendicitis, and necrotizing enterocolitis.
  • Duodenal obstruction, seen in midgut volvulus and malrotation, is also seen with duodenal stenosis, duodenal web, annular pancreas, preduodenal portal vein, and duodenal atresia.
  • Upper GI series sensitivity is 85-95%, with a higher specificity (false positives are rare). Although a DJJ low and to the right of normal is a sensitive indicator of malrotation, this finding can also occur secondary to distended bowel, masses, and splenomegaly, especially in children younger than 4 years, whose mesenteric attachments are not as well fixed as they are in later years. Scoliosis makes it difficult to rule out malrotation because the normal bony landmarks are lost.

Computed Tomography

Findings

See Ultrasound.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

Diagnosis of malrotation with midgut volvulus on fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported.1 In practice, this is a difficult diagnosis to make, and MRI is not recommended in infants suspected of having malrotation with midgut volvulus.

Ultrasonography

Findings

Ultrasonography and CT may suggest the diagnosis of malrotation; however, their sensitivities and specificities are low compared to those of an upper GI series. An upper GI examination is mandatory to confirm the diagnosis, if it is suspected on CT or ultrasonography. If the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) lies to the left of or posterior to the SMA, malrotation is suggested; however, normal vascular positioning (the SMV being slightly ventral and to the right of SMA) can be seen in approximately 30% of patients with malrotation.

The "whirlpool sign" on color Doppler ultrasonography shows mesentery and flow within the SMV wrapping around the SMA (in a clockwise direction), suggesting, but not entirely specific for, malrotation with midgut volvulus (see Image 8). A dilated, fluid-filled duodenum is frequently seen in patients who have obstruction without volvulus.

Degree of Confidence

The moderate-to-low degree of confidence associated with ultrasonography and CT necessitates an upper GI series to confirm the diagnosis.

False Positives/Negatives

Ultrasonography and CT have false-negative rates of approximately 30% and false-positive rates as high as 20%.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Nuclear medicine techniques do not provide sufficient resolution to confidently diagnose midgut volvulus; therefore, nuclear medicine is not a recommended imaging modality for the diagnosis this condition.

Angiography

Findings

Angiographic abnormalities with chronic volvulus have been well described, and they include proximal occlusion of the SMA, a "barber-pole sign" (whirling SMA and its branches), extensive collateral vessels, and thickening of the small bowel folds.

Angiography is not used to diagnose acute midgut volvulus.

Degree of Confidence

The degree of confidence is high, but this examination is rarely indicated.

False Positives/Negatives

Few false positives or false negatives are seen with angiography.

More on Midgut Volvulus

Overview: Midgut Volvulus
Imaging: Midgut Volvulus
Follow-up: Midgut Volvulus
Multimedia: Midgut Volvulus
References

References

  1. Miyakoshi K, Ishimoto H, Tanigaki S, Minegishi K, Tanaka M, Miyazaki T. Prenatal diagnosis of midgut volvulus by sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Perinatol. Dec 2001;18(8):447-50. [Medline].

  2. Applegate KE, Anderson JM, Klatte EC. Intestinal malrotation in children: a problem-solving approach to the upper gastrointestinal series. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 2006;26(5):1485-500. [Medline].

  3. Filston HC, Kirks DR. Malrotation - the ubiquitous anomaly. J Pediatr Surg. Aug 1981;16(4 Suppl 1):614-20. [Medline].

  4. Ford EG, Senac MO Jr, Srikanth MS. Malrotation of the intestine in children. Ann Surg. Feb 1992;215(2):172-8. [Medline].

  5. Frye TR, Mah CL, Schiller M. Roentgenographic evidence of gangrenous bowel in midgut volvulus with observations in experimental volvulus. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. Feb 1972;114(2):394-401. [Medline].

  6. Gasparini FF, Navarro OM, Dasgupta R, Gerstle JT, Thorner PS, Manson DE. Ileocolic intussusception mimicking the imaging appearance of midgut volvulus as a result of extrinsic duodenal obstruction. Pediatr Radiol. Dec 2005;35(12):1246-9. [Medline].

  7. Hsu CY, Chiba Y, Fukui O, Sasaki Y, Miyashita S. Counterclockwise barber-pole sign on prenatal three-dimensional power Doppler sonography in a case of duodenal obstruction without intestinal malrotation. J Clin Ultrasound. Feb 2004;32(2):86-90. [Medline].

  8. Lilien LD, Srinivasan G, Pyati SP. Green vomiting in the first 72 hours in normal infants. Am J Dis Child. Jul 1986;140(7):662-4. [Medline].

  9. Long FR, Kramer SS, Markowitz RI. Intestinal malrotation in children: tutorial on radiographic diagnosis in difficult cases. Radiology. Mar 1996;198(3):775-80. [Medline].

  10. Long FR, Kramer SS, Markowitz RI. Radiographic patterns of intestinal malrotation in children. Radiographics. May 1996;16(3):547-56; discussion 556-60. [Medline].

  11. Miyakoshi K, Ishimoto H, Tanigaki S, Minegishi K, Tanaka M, Miyazaki T. Prenatal diagnosis of midgut volvulus by sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Perinatol. Dec 2001;18(8):447-50. [Medline].

  12. Mori H, Hayashi K, Futagawa S. Vascular compromise in chronic volvulus with midgut malrotation. Pediatr Radiol. 1987;17(4):277-81. [Medline].

  13. Powell DM, Othersen HB, Smith CD. Malrotation of the intestines in children: the effect of age on presentation and therapy. J Pediatr Surg. Aug 1989;24(8):777-80. [Medline].

  14. Pracros JP, Sann L, Genin G. Ultrasound diagnosis of midgut volvulus: the "whirlpool" sign. Pediatr Radiol. 1992;22(1):18-20. [Medline].

  15. Shimanuki Y, Aihara T, Takano H. Clockwise whirlpool sign at color Doppler US: an objective and definite sign of midgut volvulus. Radiology. Apr 1996;199(1):261-4. [Medline].

  16. Simpson AJ, Leonidas JC, Krasna IH. Roentgen diagnosis of midgut malrotation: value of upper gastrointestinal radiographic study. J Pediatr Surg. Apr 1972;7(2):243-52. [Medline].

  17. Spigland N, Brandt ML, Yazbeck S. Malrotation presenting beyond the neonatal period. J Pediatr Surg. Nov 1990;25(11):1139-42. [Medline].

  18. Stringer DA , Babyn PS. Pediatric Gastrointestinal Imaging and Intervention. 2nd ed. Hamilton, ON, Canada: BC Decker; 2000:311-32.

  19. Torres AM, Ziegler MM. Malrotation of the intestine. World J Surg. May-Jun 1993;17(3):326-31. [Medline].

  20. Zerin JM, DiPietro MA. Mesenteric vascular anatomy at CT: normal and abnormal appearances. Radiology. Jun 1991;179(3):739-42. [Medline].

  21. Zerin JM, DiPietro MA. Superior mesenteric vascular anatomy at US in patients with surgically proved malrotation of the midgut. Radiology. Jun 1992;183(3):693-4. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

malrotation with midgut volvulus, nonrotation, reverse rotation, malrotation

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Janet R Reid, MD, FRCP(C), Associate Professor of Radiology, Section Head of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital of Cleveland Clinic
Janet R Reid, MD, FRCP(C) is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Women Radiologists, American Society of Neuroradiology, Ohio State Medical Association, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, and Society for Pediatric Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Henrique M Lederman, MD, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Professor of Radiology and Pediatric Radiology, Chief, Division of Diagnostic Imaging in Pediatrics, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Henrique M Lederman, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Pediatric Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

David A Stringer, BSc, MBBS, FRCR, FRCPC, Professor, National University of Singapore; Head, Diagnostic Imaging, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
David A Stringer, BSc, MBBS, FRCR, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: British Columbia Medical Association, Canadian Association of Radiologists, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, Ontario Medical Association, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Royal College of Radiologists, and Society for Pediatric Radiology
Disclosure: None None None

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Karani, MBBS, FRCR, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.