eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Pediatrics

Osgood-Schlatter Disease: Imaging

Author: Aparna Joshi, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Oct 12, 2007

Radiography

Findings

Findings vary with the age of the child and the stage of the condition at the time the radiograph is obtained.

In the acute stage, edema of the skin and tissues anterior to the tibial tuberosity are present, and the edges of the patellar tendon may be blurred. The Hoffa fat pad may be edematous. If the tibial tuberosity is cartilaginous, no change is seen initially; after 3-4 weeks, fragmented ossification may be visible within the tendon. In the older patient, whose tibial tuberosity is ossified, linear or nodular avulsed bony fragments may be concomitantly visible with the soft-tissue findings, and a bony defect may be visible at the donor site.

In the subacute stage, soft-tissue edema subsides. A previously visible avulsed ossific fragment may remain. New ossific opacities may develop in the injured patellar tendon.

In the late stage, ossific fragments may unite completely to form a normal-appearing tibial tuberosity. If the fragments are dislocated, they may remain superior and anterior to the tibial tuberosity. If they fuse to the tuberosity, the fragments form a bony excrescence from the tibia that extends into the patellar tendon.

Degree of Confidence

Soft-tissue edema in the region of the tibial tuberosity, with thickening and indistinct margins of the patellar tendon, enables the diagnosis of active Osgood-Schlatter disease with a high degree of confidence; usually, radiologic confirmation of this diagnosis is not necessary. Multiple ossification centers may represent sequelae of previous disease or may be a normal finding with accessory ossification centers.

False Positives/Negatives

Accessory ossification centers may mimic findings in the late changes of Osgood-Schlatter disease. The radiographic differential diagnosis of multiple ossific opacities in the area of the anterior tibial tuberosity includes accessory ossification centers, which are normal variants, and late changes from a previous Osgood-Schlatter lesion.

Computed Tomography

Findings

Tendon enlargement and focal decreased attenuation at the insertion of the tendon on the tibial tuberosity are seen in the active stage. Distended deep or superficial infrapatellar bursae may be seen in either the active or late stage. An ossicle may be visible in either the active or late stage, as explained in Radiograph, Findings. The donor site of an ossicle may be visible as a defect in the anterior tibial tuberosity.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

In the acute stage, T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images demonstrate increased signal intensity in the tendon at its insertion site. Distended deep and superficial infrapatellar bursae are frequently demonstrated. Ossicles are not depicted as well as they are on CT scans. Marrow edema may be seen in the tibial tuberosity and tibial epiphysis.

In the late stage, signal intensity in the abnormal tendon and marrow edema may normalize. In some cases, thickened cartilage is seen anterior to the tibial tuberosity.

Ultrasonography

Findings

Ultrasonograms can depict the same anatomic abnormalities as can plain radiographs, CT scans, and magnetic resonance images. The distal patellar tendon is thickened, and it is more echogenic than that of healthy control subjects.2 A hypoechoic zone of soft-tissue swelling may exist around the apophysis of the anterior tibial tuberosity. A curvilinear echogenic line may be seen anterior to the tibial tuberosity; this finding is consistent with the presence of an avulsed fragment of the tuberosity.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Little information is available regarding the scintigraphic findings of the Osgood-Schlatter lesion. In a published series of 3-phase bone scintigrams that were performed in 10 patients, the findings were normal in all but 1 patient.3 In this single case, increased flow was seen at the time the symptoms appeared, and normal activity was depicted on delayed images. A follow-up scintigram that was obtained in this patient after the symptoms resolved showed a return to normal activity on all 3 phases.

More on Osgood-Schlatter Disease

Overview: Osgood-Schlatter Disease
Imaging: Osgood-Schlatter Disease
Follow-up: Osgood-Schlatter Disease
Multimedia: Osgood-Schlatter Disease
References

References

  1. Kujala UM, Kvist M, Heinonen O. Osgood-Schlatter's disease in adolescent athletes. Retrospective study of incidence and duration. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1985;13(4):236-41. [Medline].

  2. Lanning P, Heikkinen E. Ultrasonic features of the Osgood-Schlatter lesion. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 1991;11(4):538-40. [Medline].

  3. Rosenberg ZS, Kawelblum M, Cheung YY, et al. Osgood-Schlatter lesion: fracture or tendinitis? Scintigraphic, CT, and MR imaging features. Radiology. Dec 1992;185(3):853-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  4. Flowers MJ, Bhadreshwar DR. Tibial tuberosity excision for symptomatic Osgood-Schlatter disease. J Pediatr Orthop. May-Jun 1995;15(3):292-7. [Medline].

  5. Lynch MC, Walsh HP. Tibia recurvatum as a complication of Osgood-Schlatter's disease: a report of two cases. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 1991;11(4):543-4. [Medline].

  6. Ozonoff MB. Tibial tuberosity avulsion (Osgood-Schlatter lesion). In: Pediatric Orthopedic Radiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1992:365-8.

  7. Visuri T, Pihlajamäki HK, Mattila VM, et al. Elongated patellae at the final stage of Osgood-Schlatter disease: a radiographic study. Knee. Jun 2007;14(3):198-203. [Medline].

  8. Weiss JM, Jordan SS, Andersen JS, et al. Surgical Treatment of Unresolved Osgood-Schlatter Disease: Ossicle Resection With Tibial Tubercleplasty. J Pediatr Orthop. October/November 2007;27(7):844-7. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

Osgood-Schlatter lesion, tibial apophysitis, tibial tuberosity avulsion, tibial tuberosity osteochondrosis, knee pain in adolescents, knee pain in children, pediatric knee pain

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Aparna Joshi, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Beverly P Wood, MD, MS, PhD, EdD, Professor, Departments of Radiology and Pediatrics, Division of Medical Education, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Beverly P Wood, MD, MS, PhD, EdD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Women Radiologists, American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Medical Association, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America, and Society for Pediatric Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Marta Hernanz-Schulman, MD, FAAP, Professor, Radiology, Radiological Sciences, and Pediatrics, Director, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Radiologist-in-Chief, Director, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital
Marta Hernanz-Schulman, MD, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and American Roentgen Ray Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM, Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.