eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Pediatrics

Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Imaging

Author: Anish Kirpalani, MD, Consulting Radiologist, Texas Radiology Associates, LLP
Coauthor(s): Paul S Babyn, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto; Radiologist-in-Chief, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 5, 2008

Radiography

Findings

In cases of suspected osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), postnatal radiographs should include views of the long bones, skull, chest, pelvis, and thoracolumbar spine.

Radiographic features are related to the type of OI and the severity of disease. Some findings, however, may be seen in all subtypes.

General radiographic features of OI

The radiologic sine qua non of OI is generalized osteoporosis of both the axial and appendicular skeleton.

Milder forms of OI result in thin, overtubulated (gracile) bones with thin cortices and relatively few fractures (see Images 1-2). The short tubular bones are also affected, though they are less frequently fractured.

More severe forms of OI, such as types II and III, feature thickened, shortened long bones with multiple fractures; these forms are often complicated by hyperplastic callus formation (see Image 3). The callus is most often found around the femur and is often large, appearing as a dense, irregular mass arising from the cortex of bone. This callus is associated with thickened periosteum. Its presence causes other differential diagnostic considerations, including the following: osteosarcoma, myositis ossificans, chronic osteomyelitis, and osteochondroma.

In milder forms of disease, radiographs of the skull may reveal normal skull development. With increasing disease severity, the skull demonstrates poor mineralization and multiple wormian, or intrasutural, bones (see Images 4-5).

The chest may be small. Multiple rib fractures are often found; these can cause the ribs to become broad and deformed.

Spinal abnormalities in all subtypes include platyspondyly and scoliosis (see Type III findings, below).

Recent advances in the treatment of OI with bisphosphonates have resulted in specific imaging findings. Cyclical pamidronate treatment produces sclerotic growth recovery lines in the long bones (see Image 1 and Image 6). The amount of bone growth between doses of pamidronate may be measured by the distance between these growth lines.

Type-specific radiographic features of OI

Some radiographic findings are more specific to certain subtypes of OI than others.

Type II

Type II OI is further categorized into 3 subtypes on the basis of radiologic features of the long bones and ribs. In types IIA and IIB, the long bones are short and broad because of undermodeling; the bones are also crumpled. In type IIC, the long bones are thinner (cylindrical) and longer than in the other subtypes, though they are still undermodeled.

The ribs in type IIA are short and broad with continuous beading. In type IIB, beading is absent or minimal and discontinuous. In type IIC, the ribs are thin and beaded.

Type III

The following radiographic findings are specific to type III OI.

Scoliosis of the thoracolumbar spine: As many as 25% of patients with OI have scoliosis, and the association is even higher in patients with type III OI (see Image 7). Most have an S -shaped scoliosis.

Severe platyspondyly with vertebral compression fractures and codfish vertebrae are more common in this type than in other types (see Image 8).

Popcorn calcifications occur commonly in the metaphyseal-epiphyseal region of long bones, most commonly at the knee and ankle. This results from repeated microfractures at the growth plate.

Soft craniofacial bones with a large, thin calvarium cause triangular facies.

Type IV

Radiographic findings of this type are similar to the general findings and findings specific to type I OI.

One feature more commonly associated with type IV than other types is basilar invagination (impression), with or without brainstem compression. This may be detected on plain radiography of the skull or cervical spine. The McGregor line may be used to assess for this complication. This is defined as the straight line connecting the upper surface of the posterior edge of the hard palate to the most caudal point of the occipital curve. Projection of the tip of the odontoid process above the McGregor line suggests the presence of basilar invagination (see Images 9-10).

The presence of a large, thin cranium with platybasia and cranial settling may lead to the appearance of the Tam O'Shanter skull.

Degree of Confidence

Upon the detection of hallmark bone findings of osteogenesis imperfecta on plain radiographs, the diagnosis may be made with a high degree of confidence; confirmation with other imaging modalities is not needed.

Computed Tomography

Findings

Currently, the major role of CT is in adjunctive problem-solving. CT may be used to further assess for basilar impression (see Image 9 and MRI below), to evaluate the petrous bone for narrowing of the middle ear or otosclerosis, and to support bone mineral densitometry (BMD) (see Nuclear Medicine below).

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

The major role of MRI in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is in problem-solving. MRI is also used to image complications of OI, such as basilar impression. Although cervical spinal radiography and CT may demonstrate this abnormality well, MRI has the advantage of detecting associated compression of the spinal cord (see Image 10).

Basilar impression is frequently associated with type IV OI. In particular, in type IVB OI, the incidence of neurologic symptoms is increased.

Other associated conditions that may be imaged better with MRI than with plain radiography include syringohydromyelia and communicating hydrocephalus, especially if these conditions develop after fontanelle closure.

Ultrasonography

Findings

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is one of the most common skeletal dysplasias detected on prenatal ultrasonography. Most cases involve type II OI and are found incidentally.

The diagnosis of OI may be made reliably by week 17 of gestation. The diagnosis may be made by detecting morphologic abnormalities on sonograms or by analyzing collagen synthesized by chorionic villus cells after sonography-guided chorionic villus sampling.

Sonographic findings of OI during the second trimester scanning include decreased echoes from the calvarium with supervisualized (too easily seen) intracranial structures; bowing and angulation of the long bones, implying platic deformities and fractures; decreased length of the long bones; and multiple rib fractures.17

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Bone mineral densitometry (BMD) results may confirm the severity of osteoporosis in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI); it may also confirm the presence of demineralization in mild cases of type I or type IV OI.

Currently accepted BMD measurement techniques include the following: (1) cortical radial BMD measured by use of single-photon absorptiometry (SPA); (2) BMD of the lumbar spine (in children older than 1 y) and femoral neck (in children older than 6 y), in which BMD is obtained by use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA); and (3) lumbar spinal BMD measured by means of CT in children older than 4 years.

Degree of Confidence

There are only a few reported cases in which bone mineral densitometry measurements were made in young children with osteogenesis imperfecta; as such, the reliability of these measurements is unknown.

More on Osteogenesis Imperfecta

Overview: Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Imaging: Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Follow-up: Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Multimedia: Osteogenesis Imperfecta
References

References

  1. Byra P, Chillag S, Petit S. Osteogenesis imperfecta and aortic dissection. Am J Med Sci. Jul 2008;336(1):70-2. [Medline].

  2. Hasegawa K, Kataoka K, Inoue M, Seino Y, Morishima T, Tanaka H. Impaired pyridinoline cross-link formation in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Miner Metab. 2008;26(4):394-9. [Medline].

  3. Brusin JH. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Radiol Technol. Jul-Aug 2008;79(6):535-48. [Medline].

  4. Burnei G, Vlad C, Georgescu I, Gavriliu TS, Dan D. Osteogenesis imperfecta: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Jun 2008;16(6):356-66. [Medline].

  5. Cheung MS, Glorieux FH. Osteogenesis Imperfecta: update on presentation and management. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. Jun 2008;9(2):153-60. [Medline].

  6. Tainmont J. History of osteogenesis imperfecta or brittle bone disease: a few stops on a road 3000 years long. B-ENT. 2007;3(3):157-73. [Medline].

  7. Ablin DS. Osteogenesis imperfecta: a review. Can Assoc Radiol J. Apr 1998;49(2):110-23. [Medline].

  8. Cole WG. Advances in osteogenesis imperfecta. Clin Orthop. Aug 2002;6-16. [Medline].

  9. Glorieux FH, Rauch F, Plotkin H, et al. Type V osteogenesis imperfecta: a new form of brittle bone disease. J Bone Miner Res. Sep 2000;15(9):1650-8. [Medline].

  10. Sillence DO, Senn A, Danks DM. Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet. Apr 1979;16(2):101-16. [Medline].

  11. Paterson CR, Ogston SA, Henry RM. Life expectancy in osteogenesis imperfecta. BMJ. Feb 10 1996;312(7027):351. [Medline].

  12. Subramaniam P, Mathew S, Sugnani SN. Dentinogenesis imperfecta: A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. Apr-Jun 2008;26(2):85-7. [Medline].

  13. Kornblum M, Stanitski DF. Spinal manifestations of skeletal dysplasias. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 1999;30(3):501-20. [Medline].

  14. Sillence D. Osteogenesis imperfecta: an expanding panorama of variants. Clin Orthop. Sep 1981;11-25. [Medline].

  15. Kirks DR, ed. Musculoskeletal System. Practical Pediatric Imaging: Diagnostic Radiology of Infants and Children. 3rd ed. 1998: 362-3.

  16. Taybi H, Lachman RS. Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Radiology of Syndromes, Metabolic Disorders, and Skeletal Dysplasias, 4th ed. 1996: 876-82.

  17. Krakow D, Alanay Y, Rimoin LP, Lin V, Wilcox WR, Lachman RS, et al. Evaluation of prenatal-onset osteochondrodysplasias by ultrasonography: A retrospective and prospective analysis. Am J Med Genet A. Jul 14 2008;[Medline].

  18. Radfar L, Masood F. Bisphosphonates, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and dental treatment recommendations. J Okla Dent Assoc. Apr-May 2008;99(7):28-9. [Medline].

  19. el-Sobky MA, Hanna AA, Basha NE, Tarraf YN, Said MH. Surgery versus surgery plus pamidronate in the management of osteogenesis imperfecta patients: a comparative study. J Pediatr Orthop B. May 2006;15(3):222-8. [Medline].

  20. DiMeglio LA, Peacock M. Two-year clinical trial of oral alendronate versus intravenous pamidronate in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Miner Res. Jan 2006;21(1):132-40. [Medline].

  21. Andiran N, Alikasifoglu A, Gonc N, Ozon A, Kandemir N, Yordam N. Cyclic pamidronate therapy in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: results of treatment and follow-up after discontinuation. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. Jan 2008;21(1):63-72. [Medline].

  22. Ablin DS, Greenspan A, Reinhart M, Grix A. Differentiation of child abuse from osteogenesis imperfecta. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 1990;154(5):1035-46. [Medline].

  23. Kleinman PK. Differential Diagnosis II: Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse. 2nd ed. 1998: 197-213.

Further Reading

Keywords

osteogenesis imperfecta, OI, collagen disease, bone disease, inborn genetic disease, Lobstein disease, Lobstein's disease, Ekman syndrome, Ekman's syndrome, osteochondrodysplasia, osteopsathyrosis, van der Hoeve syndrome, an der Hoeve's syndrome, Bruck syndrome, Bruck's syndrome, temporary brittle-bone disease, weak bones, COL1A1, COL1A2, dentinogenesis imperfecta

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Anish Kirpalani, MD, Consulting Radiologist, Texas Radiology Associates, LLP
Anish Kirpalani, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Canadian Association of Radiologists, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Paul S Babyn, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto; Radiologist-in-Chief, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children
Paul S Babyn, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Harris L Cohen, MD, FACR, Vice Chairman/Associate Chairman (Research Activities), Director, Division of Body Imaging, Professor of Radiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine; Visiting Professor of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Harris L Cohen, MD, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Association of Program Directors in Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Marta Hernanz-Schulman, MD, FAAP, Professor, Radiology, Radiological Sciences, and Pediatrics, Director, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Radiologist-in-Chief, Director, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital
Marta Hernanz-Schulman, MD, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and American Roentgen Ray Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM, Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.