Radiography is the mainstay in idiopathic scoliosis imaging to both confirm the diagnosis and rule out any underlying conditions. Scoliosis is the presence of 1 or more lateral rotatory curves of the spine in the coronal plane. Although defined as a side-to-side deformity, it is a 3-dimensional (3D) rotational deformity. Many causes of scoliosis are known; however, 80% of them are idiopathic. Idiopathic scoliosis is a diagnosis of exclusion.
Most cases of scoliosis are managed conservatively, but surgery is required in select cases to arrest further progression of the deformity, to correct the curve, and to manage severe pain. Imaging plays a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis, determining the cause, grading the severity of the curve, assessing maturity, identifying patients who need surgery, and assessing postoperative complications.
American College of Radiology guidelines and recommendations
The ACR guidelines include the following  :
Indications for radiography include alterations in normal spinal alignment on physical examination, evaluation of spinal curvature progression, and follow-up of treatment
For a scoliosis survey, the preferred method is a posteroanterior radiograph with the patient in the upright position
For those patients who are being assessed or are being clinically treated for scoliosis, other images include right and left lateral bending images, lateral vertical beam image, and a posteroanterior image of the left wrist and the hand for bone age
Radiographic analysis should identify the presence, direction, location, and apex of the curvature
Skeletal maturity determination is important because mild to moderate scoliotic curves do not progress after cessation of growth
Clinical examination should include neurologic examination to assess the deformity. A scoliometer is placed over the spinous process at the apex to measure the angle of trunk rotation (ATR). The measurement is significant if it is more than 5°.
Radiography is the mainstay in assessment of scoliosis (see the images below). It is used to confirm the clinical diagnosis of scoliosis, to exclude underlying causes (eg, segmentation abnormalities), to assess the curves and their severity, to monitor progression, to assess skeletal maturity, and to determine a patient's suitability for surgery. This study is also useful in diagnosing postoperative complications and in follow-up.
Bone scans are useful to evaluate cases of painful scoliosis and to identify tumors or infections (see the image below). They are more sensitive than plain radiography.
CT scanning with sagittal and coronal reconstructions can provide all the information that a plain radiograph provides (see the images below).  With CT, 3D reconstructions are useful in assessing segmentation abnormalities. CT can also be used to assess the true extent of rotation and rib deformities. It plays an important role in evaluating postoperative complications.
The role of MRI is controversial.  Although some institutes prefer to perform routine preoperative MRI in all patients, studies have shown that such an approach does not provide clinically significant results. MRI is useful for diagnosing associated spinal and neurologic lesions. Small tumors and infections can be localized by using MRI (see the images below). [3, 4, 5, 6]
Limitations of techniques
The main limitation of radiography is the radiation dose. The risk of carcinogenesis is increased because of the repeated examinations done to monitor curve progression. This risk can be reduced with the judicious use of radiography and proper protection techniques.
Radiography is less sensitive than bone scanning and MRI because tumors or infections are apparent only after 50% of the bone is destroyed. Radiographs cannot be used to assess abnormalities of the spinal cord.
CT scanning is not routinely indicated, but it is a good method for assessing rotation and segmentation abnormalities. Radiography can provide all of the information needed. MRI is not cost-effective, and it is not a good screening tool because its yield in depicting important clinical abnormalities that change management is minimal.
Radiography is performed to confirm the diagnosis of scoliosis (which is made on clinical grounds), to exclude underlying bony segmentation abnormalities, assess the severity of the curve, monitor progression of the curve (which is done by measuring indices), assess skeletal maturity by noting the ossification of the iliac apophysis, evaluate associated cardiac and pulmonary anomalies, and assess the patient's progress and to evaluate complications during and after surgery (see the images below). [7, 8, 9]
The lateral curvature to the spine is present and described in terms of the convex or concave side  Four patterns are seen in idiopathic scoliosis: (1) thoracic curve, (2) lumbar curve, (3) thoracolumbar curve on the same side, and (4) thoracic and lumbar curves on opposite sides. The number of vertebrae involved in the curve should be assessed. 
In a healthy person, a straight line can be drawn through the cervicothoracic, dorsolumbar, and lumbosacral junctions. The degree of deviation in the cervicothoracic angle from the sacral center is measured. Hypokyphosis of less than 20° or lordosis is present. The normal thoracic kyphosis is 20-45°. The apical vertebrae show increased height in the anterior aspect of vertebral body and decreased height in the posterior aspect.  Vertebral bodies and intervertebral disk spaces are wider on the convex side than on the concave side.
The posterior ribs are pushed posteriorly on the convex side, where they produce a hump. They are positioned anteriorly on the concave side. The ribs are closely approximated on the concave side and separated on convex side.
At the end of the curve, the disk spaces are equal or widened on the concave side. The vertebrae and neural arches are thick on the concave side. The spinous process is shifted toward the concave side, and the pedicle and vertebral body are shifted toward the convex side.
The rotation is marked at the apex of the curve and almost neutral at the end vertebrae. Rotation can be intersegmental (between vertebrae) or intrasegmental (between elements of 1 vertebrae); the latter is uncorrectable. The psoas shadow is absent on the concave side of the curve.
Many classification systems are used to describe the types of scoliotic curves. Classification helps surgeons in deciding appropriate management because the prognosis and treatment of the various curves differ.
The Ponseti-Friedman classification has 5 types:
I is a single major lumbar curve at T11-L3 with an apex at L1-2 (this is the most benign type and affects 23% of patients)
II is a single major dorsolumbar curve at T6-7 to L1-2 with an apex at T11-12 (16%)
III is combined thoracic and lumbar (37%) with a dorsal curve on the right side at T5-6 or T10-11 and an apex at T7-8 and a lumbar curve on the left side at T10-11 to L3-4 with an apex at L1-2
IV is a single major thoracic curve at T5-6 to T11-12 with an apex at T8-9 (22%)
V is cervicothoracic at C7-T1 or T4-5 with an apex at T3
The King-Moe classification has 4 types:
I, which is lumbar dominant and S shaped (10%)
II, which is thoracic dominant and S shaped (33%)
III, which is thoracic where the thoracic and lumbar curves do not cross the midline (33%)
IV, long thoracic or double thoracic with T1 tilted into the upper curve where (the upper curve is structural (10%) 
The Lenke classification has 3 components: type of curve; lumbar modifier; and sagittal thoracic modifier.
Type of curves are as follows: I, primary thoracic; II, double thoracic scoliosis; III, double major scoliosis; IV, triple major scoliosis; and V, dorsolumbar-lumbar scoliosis.
The lumbar modifier is based on the relationship of the central sacral vertical line to the apex of the lumbar curve and is classified into A, B, and C categories.
The sagittal thoracic modifier is the sagittal curve measurement from T5-12; designations are the minus sign for less than 10°, the letter "N" for 10-40°, and the plus sign for greater than 40°. [14, 13, 15]
The classic views obtained in the evaluation of scoliosis are as follows:
Posteroanterior (PA) erect view of the entire spine from cervical to sacral spine and including the iliac crest; this view is ideally obtained with the patient's shoulders outstretched
AP recumbent view of entire spine, cervical to sacral
Lateral view of dorsolumbar spine; the patient's forearm must be kept horizontal by resting it on a stand
Lateral profile at the apex of scoliosis to eliminate kyphosis and show the true extent of the scoliosis
Stagnara image (planed election view) perpendicular to the true coronal plane of the apical vertebra
Leeds image, a true lateral view 90° perpendicular to the Stagnara view
Left and right lateral bending views; these are obtained to exclude postural scoliosis; postural scoliosis disappears when bending toward the side of convexity; these views are also used to assess structural scoliosis, asymmetry and loss of normal mobility of primary curve,  and wedging rotation of individual vertebra, as well as to dynamically assess the postural nature of secondary compensatory curves in the preoperative period and to select fusion levels
AP view of the left hand to assess bone age
Biplanar views with digital enhancement
Ferguson view perpendicular to the L5-S1 disks to detect anomalies at this junction
Coned views of focal vertebral anomalies
In routine practice, not all these views are necessary. Full-length frontal and lateral views, as well as right and lateral bending views, are enough.
Common views obtained before surgery are PA and lateral image, which are obtained with long-cassette film to cover the whole spine beginning from the craniocervical junction and including the pelvis to assess the Risser grade; supine, standing, or sitting images if patient is unable to stand; and lateral bending views to assess the extent of compensatory curves.
For subsequent follow-up imaging, the frontal PA view is sufficient, and lateral views are required only if a superimposed kyphotic element is present.
Terminology used to describe scoliosis
The apical vertebra is the vertebra that is displaced and rotated most. Its endplates are least tilted.
The end vertebrae are the most superior and inferior vertebrae in the curve. These bones are least displaced and rotated, with maximal tilting of the endplates toward the concavity of the curve. They are laterally wedged, longer in the convex side and compressed on the concave side.
The neutral vertebra is not rotated on the anteroposterior (AP) image.
The stable vertebra is bisected by the central sacral line.
The primary curve is the structural curve, with wedging, angulation, rotation, and an abnormal position. The primary curve is deformed and develops structural changes simultaneously. It is not corrected spontaneously or with mechanical correction. The following characteristics are helpful in identifying the primary curve: (1) the vertebrae are deviated to the convexity of the curve; (2) if 3 curves are present, the middle one is usually the primary curve; (3) if 4 curves are present, the middle 2 are the primary ones; and (4) the primary curve may be the greatest curve.
The secondary curve is the nonstructural curve that develops in response to the primary structural curve. The structural changes in this curve occur slowly. It can be corrected spontaneously, and any mechanical correction is retained. The vertebrae are displaced to the concavity of the curve.
The compensatory curves are curves formed to balance the primary curve. If a primary curve is formed in 1 direction, another curve of same magnitude should be formed in the opposite direction to fully compensate for the deformity. For example, if the primary curve is 50°, 1 or 2 compensatory curves may be present and add to equal 50° in the opposite direction.
A decompensated curve is a compensatory curve that does not fully correct the deformity. An example is a 40° compensatory curve for a 50° primary curve results in decompensation.
An overcompensated curve is a compensatory curve that is more than the primary curve. An example is a 60° compensatory curve or a combination of curves adding to 60° that overcompensates for a 50° primary curve.
Indices used to assess scoliosis
There are a number of techniques, measures, and indices to assess scoliosis, including the Cobb-Webb technique, Lippman-Cobb technique, Ferguson technique, Greenspan method, Nash-Moe technique of measuring vertebral rotation, Cobb method of assessing vertebral rotation, and the Risser index.
This is the most commonly used technique to measure the severity of scoliosis. The result determines further management and helps in predicting the prognosis.
The superior and inferior end vertebrae of the scoliotic curve are identified by carefully observing the rotation of vertebral bodies and the width of the intervertebral space. The intervertebral space is almost normal, and the vertebrae are in neutral position without substantial rotation in the superior and inferior end vertebra.
Lines are drawn tangential to superior endplate of the superior end vertebra and the inferior endplate of the inferior vertebra. The Cobb-Webb angle is the angle formed at the intersection of these lines or the angle formed at the intersection of the lines perpendicular to these lines. A Cobb angle of at least 10° is essential for diagnosing scoliosis.
Limitations of Cobb-Webb angle include the following:
Uniplanar measurement of a 3D deformity
Diurnal variation, with angles 5° greater in the afternoon than in the morning
Variations that occur with changes in supine and upright positioning, rotation, body shape, and radiographic technique
Spinal growth of 1° per month during periods of rapid growth (frequent assessments (eg, every 3-4 mo) are need for accurate measurements of the curve)
Angle of curvature determined only by the orientation of the end vertebra
Values higher than those obtained with other measurement techniques
A 10° measurement difference should be present to be 95% confident that the curve is progressing.
The Lippman-Cobb classification of scoliotic curvature is as follows (see the images below):
I = Less than 20°
II = 21-30°
III = 31-50°
IV = 51-75°
V = 76-100°
VI = 101-125°
VII = Greater than 125°Line diagram illustrates measurement of the Lippman-Cobb angle.Radiograph shows measurement of Lippman-Cobb angle.Line diagram illustrates measurement of the Cobb angle by using a modified technique.Radiograph shows modified Cobb angle.
A line is drawn from the center of the apical vertebra to the center of the superior end vertebra. Another line is drawn from the center of the apical vertebra to the center of the inferior end vertebra (see the images below).
The angle between these lines is used to assess the severity of the deformity.
This technique provides a measurement of the scoliotic curve more comprehensive than that obtained with other methods (see the images below). The midpoint of the vertebra above the upper end vertebra and the midpoint of the vertebra below the lower end vertebra are joined to form a vertical spinal line. Lines are drawn from the center of each vertebra in the scoliotic curve to the vertical spinal line. The value of these individual lines are added and divided by the length of the vertical spinal line. A correction factor is added for magnification.
In a healthy person, the value is zero. This method is superior to the Lippman-Cobb technique because it allows the clinician to measure the deviation at each individual vertebral level. This technique is also valuable in measuring short-segment or small curvatures.
Nash-Moe technique of assessing vertebral rotation
This is a measure of rotational deformity of the vertebra.
On frontal images, the vertebra is divided into 6 segments, and the rotation is quantified on the basis of where the pedicle is located. The pedicles are normally situated in the outer segments. The rotation is graded according to the extent of migration of the pedicle toward the convex side of the curve.
Cobb method of assessing vertebral rotation
The Cobb technique uses the position of spinous process for assessing the degree of vertebral rotation. The vertebra is divided into 6 equal segments by drawing 5 vertical lines (see the image below).
The spinous process is normally situated in the midpart of the vertebra overlying the third line. With increasing rotation, the spinous process is rotated toward the convex side of the curve.
The Risser index (see the image below) is used to measure ossification of the iliac apophysis, which is graded as follows:
Grade I is ossification of the lateral 25% of the iliac apophysis
Grade II is ossification of the lateral 50%
Grade III is ossification of the lateral 75% of the apophysis
Grade IV is ossification of the entire apophysis
Grade V is fusion of ossified epiphysis to the iliac wingLine diagram illustrates the Risser index.
Scoliotic curves usually progress during periods of rapid growth, such infancy and adolescence, and they stop growing after spinal maturation is complete. Spinal growth is completed at approximately 15 years 3 months of age in female adolescents and 15 years 10 months of age in male adolescents. This maturation coincides with the completion of ossification in the iliac apophysis, which begins at around 15 years in male adolescents and around 14 years in female adolescents. The whole process of ossification from stage I to stage IV requires 12-18 months.
After ossification, the apophysis fuses with iliac crests in 2 years in girls and slightly faster than this in boys. Progression usually does not happen after grade IV maturity of iliac apophysis is achieved. If the curve is 50-80° at the time of maturity, it tends to progress even after the apophysis fuses, especially if the curve is in the thoracic and lumbar region. However, this progression is far slower than the progression that occurs during adolescence.
Limitations of Risser index can be summarized as follows:
Ossification starts earlier than previous thought; hence, this index is not reliable
The index is less reliable in male patients than in female patients because their ossification starts early; in male patients, growth should be considered completed when a Risser index of only 5 is achieved
Recent data indicate that this index is not an accurate measure of completed maturity, spinal growth, or progression of the deformity
Observation for ossification of the vertebral ring apophysis
This is an alternative method for assessing skeletal maturity (see the image below).
Before skeletal maturity, the vertebral ring apophysis is absent, or it is incompletely formed or completely formed without fusing to the body. After skeletal maturity, the vertebral ring apophysis fuses to the body. This occurs by age 16 years in female adolescents and age 19 years in men.
Difference in the rib-vertebral angle
This parameter is useful in predicting the progression of the curve in the idiopathic infantile type of scoliosis (see the images below).
A line is drawn along the inferior border of the apical vertebra, and another line is drawn perpendicular to the first. The midpoints of the head and neck of ribs on either side of the apical vertebra are connected by lines. These lines are extended to meet the perpendicular line drawn initially, and the angles they make are called rib-vertebral angles.
In thoracic curves, the angle is usually smaller on the convex side than the concave side because of the greater obliquity of the ribs on the convex side. In combined thoracic and lumbar curves, the angle is low at the level of the apical thoracic vertebra and can be greater on the convex side. This curve can be further negative because of the associated drooped 12th rib on the concave side of the curve.
In resolving curves, the angle is less than 20°, and it is more than 20° in progressive curves. Subsequent images obtained after 2-3 months show a decreased angle in resolving curves and the same or increased angle in progressive curves.
The Perdriolle method is used to measure apical vertebral rotation.
The Lytilt method is used to measure the angle between the L4 vertebra and a line connecting the iliac crests.
Other methods of assessing skeletal maturity
Ossification and maturation of the epiphysis of the left hand and wrist are compared with standards. Two main methods are used. The first is the Greulich-Pyle method, in which the radiograph of the hand and wrist is compared with standard radiographs in the atlas. The second is the Tanner-Whitehouse method, in which the epiphyses of the hand and wrist are compared with those of the atlas. A score is assigned to each of them, and the sum is compared with values on standard tables. Thus, bone age is assessed.
Surgery for scoliosis
The immediate preoperative assessment should include chest radiographs for cardiovascular assessment, supine and recumbent AP views of the spine, right and left lateral bending images, and traction views.
The bending and traction views are helpful in assessing the site of fusion, the degree of correction required, and the placement of spinal devices.
Surgery for scoliosis includes the following techniques:
Two Harrington or Luque rods can be used to accomplish segmental stabilization at each level of the spine using sublaminar wires
Use of the Cotrel-Dubousset system with multiple hooks with rods may improve 3D results
An anterior approach can be used with thoracotomy or thoracoscopy in which single or double rods with screws are attached to each vertebral body; results are better than with other methods, and this approach treats the rib bump at the same time
Postoperative radiographic assessment
In the immediate postoperative period, chest radiographs are used to assess for complications. Frontal and lateral spinal images are required to assess the postoperative spine. The degree of correction of the curve can also be evaluated. 
Recognized complications are damage to the rods or wires, dislocation or migration of the rods, loosening of a device, spondylolysis, pseudoarthrosis, aortic aneurysm, retroperitoneal fibrosis, gastric volvulus, and progression of the deformity (crankshaft phenomenon). This last complication occurs when surgery is performed before maturity (Risser index < 1 and age < 10 y). The unfused vertebrae and portions of the vertebrae not included in the fusion continue to grow, producing progressive deformity. This effect is marked in posterior fusion, in which the anterior portions of vertebrae continue to grow and produce a new curve.
Follow-up assessment should be routinely performed until the patient reaches maturity.
The radiation dose is an important factor in evaluation of scoliosis. Studies by Nash et al indicate that the risk of carcinogenesis is mildly increased.
Techniques for radiation protection include the use of the following: PA view to reduce exposure to the breast; rare-earth screens; high-kilovolt setting; high-speed film; filters for upright views; tube head filters; good beam collimation; digital radiographic techniques; and breast, gonad, and thyroid shields.
The scoliotic deformity can be visualized on CT scans of the thorax and abdomen (see the images below). Associated lesions, such as osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, infection, tumors, disk prolapse, and costovertebral dislocation, can be found.
With modern multidetector-row CT scanners, thin sections of the whole body can be obtained within a few seconds and reconstructed in any plane: sagittal, coronal, oblique, or axial. Even 3D reconstruction with shaded-surface display or volume rendering is possible.
CT myelography is not routinely done, and it is not needed in idiopathic scoliosis. This is useful for evaluating intraspinal lesions, such as diastematomyelia, a tethered cord, or intraspinal tumors. Compression of the spinal cord can also be assessed.
Role of CT in evaluating scoliosis
CT is performed for an evaluation of segmentation abnormalities with 3D reconstructions, though MRIs have largely replaced these scans. CT is also used to evaluate postoperative complications because MRIs may show metallic artifacts. In addition, CT helps in evaluating intrinsic rotational deformity. Scoliotic deformity can be visualized on CT scans of the thorax and abdomen. Associated lesions, such as osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, infection, tumors, disk prolapse, and costovertebral dislocation, can be found. Finally, associated rib-cage deformity is best assessed with CT scans. The rib-cage deformity is well correlated with the longitudinal deformity at the level of the apical vertebra.
CT myelography is done to assess suspected radiculopathy, intraspinal lesions, or cord compression.
Indices used to assess rib-cage deformity
The apical vertebra of the primary curve is identified by using plain radiography. CT scans are then acquired at this level to help in assessing the longitudinal deformity. Several lines are used.
Line 1 is drawn from the center of the posterior aspect of the vertebral foramen to the center of the vertebral body and extended to the anterior chest wall. Line 2 extends from the center of the posterior aspect of vertebral foramen to the anterior midline of the body. Line 3 is a horizontal line extending through the center of the posterior aspect of the vertebral foramen. A perpendicular is then drawn from the center of the posterior aspect of vertebral foramen to meet the anterior chest wall (see the images below).
The rotation of apical vertebra from the anterior midline of the body (RAML) is the angle between the line 1 and line 2. The rotation of the apical vertebra from the sagittal plane (RASag) is the angle between the line 1 and line 3. This is the most definitive method for assessing the severity of scoliosis with CT scans. The results are significantly correlated with the Cobb-Webb angles on plain radiographs. The angle of lateral deviation of the apical vertebra from the midline of body (Mldev) is the angle between line 2 and line 3.
RAML is the sum of RASag and Mldev.
The rib-hump index is measured at the level of the rib hump by using several lines. Line 1 is a horizontal line drawn through the center of the posterior aspect of the vertebral foramen to the lateral chest wall on both sides. Line 2 is a horizontal line parallel to the first; this line passes through the peak of the inner rib cage on the hump side. Line 3 is parallel to the first and passes through the peak of the inner rib cage on the side opposite the hump. Line 4 is a perpendicular line drawn from the peak of the inner rib cage on the hump side to meet the first line at point 0.
The rib-hump index is defined as (X - Y)/Z, where X is the distance between line 1 and line 2, Y is the distance between lines 1 and 3, and Z is the distance between point 0 and the center of posterior aspect of the vertebral foramen.
The rib-hump index is directly correlated with RASag.
Postoperative CT scanning can be done to assess for the development of complications such as hemorrhage, fracture, or pseudoarthrosis.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI is performed in the sagittal, axial, and coronal planes by using T1- and T2-weighted sequences. Proper technique is difficult, especially if the patient has more than 1 curve.
MRI is indicated if the patient develops neurologic deficits after the procedure. If MRI is being done for the first time, occult spinal cord lesions cannot be detected. Imaging might be difficult because of the presence of spinal instruments. Hemorrhage, pseudoarthrosis, and tumors can be detected.
MRI is not used for diagnosing scoliosis. It is useful for assessing other etiologic factors, especially spinal cord anomalies, that can change the diagnosis. Such anomalies are most common in the infantile and juvenile types and include syringomyelia, hydromyelia, spinal-cord tumors, dysraphism, a tethered cord, diastematomyelia, lipomas, neurofibromas, and Chiari malformations (see the images below). [4, 5, 6]
Idiopathic scoliosis is diagnosed only after its differential diagnoses are excluded. In one study, 50% of all cases previously designated as being idiopathic involved some spinal lesion. Untreated syringomyelia contributes to paraplegia after surgery.
MRI is also used to investigate occult intraspinal tumors, which can occur with scoliosis but without any neurologic symptoms or signs; to exclude other underlying abnormalities, such as tumors, infections, and disk prolapse; to evaluate atypical scoliosis or an atypical curve in a child with normal neurologic findings; to evaluate the patient before surgery because assessment of the spinal cord in patients with postoperative neurologic symptoms can be difficult because surgical devices produce artifacts; to evaluate rotational deformity and distinguish intervertebral from intravertebral rotation (standard derotational surgery is suboptimal in those with predominant intravertebral rotation.); and to ascertain the severity of the curve.
Atypical features for which MRI is warranted includes the following:
Abnormal neurologic finding
Signs of dysraphism
Neck pain, headache
Weakness, pes cavus, ataxia
Atypical curves (left-sided thoracic curve, juvenile onset)
Associated lower-limb deformity
Wide spinal canal
Abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials
Do et al found that only 7 of 327 patients with diagnosed idiopathic scoliosis had other abnormalities on routine MRI.  None of the newly diagnosed pathologies were clinically important in terms of future management.
Degree of confidence
Important considerations are intraspinal tumors. Intraspinal tumors occasionally cause scoliosis and no other symptoms. In such cases, idiopathic scoliosis might be diagnosed. Only MRI can depict intraspinal tumors. The identification of notable neurologic and other diseases alters management.
If the patient develops neurologic symptoms postoperatively, assessment of the spinal cord is difficult because of the surgical devices, which produce artifacts. Hence, a routine preoperative MRI is considered useful.
Although MRI has been advocated in patients with atypical scoliosis, data confirming the benefit of this approach are lacking.
MRI can depict a number of findings; however, a recent study revealed no significant difference in the incidence of anomalies between those with atypical findings and patients without atypical findings. Even if anomalies such as syringomyelia and Chiari malformation are found, they do not affect management. Therefore, the effectiveness of MRI as a diagnostic tool is questioned.
Some centers still routinely use MRI, and others use it only if surgery is contemplated or if atypical signs are present.
Ultrasonography has only limited application in scoliosis (see the image below). If scoliosis is seen in a neonate or child with spina bifida, a sonogram of the spine can be obtained to assess the spinal cord. The position of the cord, including tethering, can be evaluated. Associated lesions, such as myelomeningocele, lipomas, epidermoids, those due to diastematomyelia, are also seen. 
Ultrasonography can be useful to assess soft-tissue complications, such as hematomas and abscesses, after surgery.
Bone scanning is not routinely performed in idiopathic scoliosis. Bone scans are obtained to evaluate atypical or painful scoliosis and to exclude infection. Focal hot spots can be seen in osteoid osteomas, osteoblastomas, infections, and other primary tumors that can cause painful scoliosis. Bone scans may also help in assessing for surgical complications, including infection. A WBC scan may be required to differentiate infection from postoperative changes in the spine. Focal hot spots are also seen in stress fractures, spondylosis, and pseudoarthrosis in the fused segments.
Bone scanning is highly sensitive in the diagnosis of bone lesions. Osteoid osteoma is the most common cause of painful scoliosis. Bone scanning is helpful in assessing this condition and for showing increased uptake.