eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Pediatrics

Vesicoureteral Reflux

Author: Kevin F McCarthy, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Radiology, National Naval Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Veronica Rooks, MD, Military Chief of Pediatric Radiology, Pediatric Radiologist, Tripler Army Medical Center; Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Nov 12, 2009

Introduction

Background

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the abnormal flow of urine from the bladder into the upper urinary tract and the most common urologic disease in childhood. Its presence is pathologic, and it represents the most significant risk factor for childhood renal scarring and its sequelae.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

The majority of cases (90%) in children represent a primary congenital failure of the natural passive 1-way mechanism of the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) to maintain unidirectional urine flow. A minority of VUR cases (10%) occur secondary to abnormalities of the ureteral insertion in association with renal transplantation, ureterocele (see Images 2-5), ureteral duplication anomalies (see Image 1), obstruction of the bladder outlet (posterior urethral valves in boys, see Image 6), dysfunctional voiding, or constipation.

Transverse gray-scale sonogram demonstrates a sma...

Transverse gray-scale sonogram demonstrates a small left ureterocele in a patient with a low-grade vesicoureteral reflux. Ultrasonography may be the most helpful means to evaluate a patient for a ureterocele, as this is often difficult to visualize on early filling of the bladder during voiding cystourethrography. Patients with gross anatomic abnormalities of the urinary tract are not likely to improve without corrective surgery. In this case, the ureterocele measured less than 1 cm in all dimensions and appeared intermittently throughout the examination.

Transverse gray-scale sonogram demonstrates a sma...

Transverse gray-scale sonogram demonstrates a small left ureterocele in a patient with a low-grade vesicoureteral reflux. Ultrasonography may be the most helpful means to evaluate a patient for a ureterocele, as this is often difficult to visualize on early filling of the bladder during voiding cystourethrography. Patients with gross anatomic abnormalities of the urinary tract are not likely to improve without corrective surgery. In this case, the ureterocele measured less than 1 cm in all dimensions and appeared intermittently throughout the examination.


Sonogram of a large, obstructing ureterocele in a...

Sonogram of a large, obstructing ureterocele in a patient with vesicoureteral reflux. The thin rim of the ureterocele is best noted on the inferior most aspect of the bladder. This ureterocele measured 4 cm in greatest dimension and is outlined by contrast material in Image 4. Note the dilated, left-sided refluxing ureter.

Sonogram of a large, obstructing ureterocele in a...

Sonogram of a large, obstructing ureterocele in a patient with vesicoureteral reflux. The thin rim of the ureterocele is best noted on the inferior most aspect of the bladder. This ureterocele measured 4 cm in greatest dimension and is outlined by contrast material in Image 4. Note the dilated, left-sided refluxing ureter.


Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrates a la...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrates a large, smooth, central filling defect peripherally outlined by contrast material. The catheter is deviated to the patient's right. This finding is consistent with a large ureterocele.

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrates a la...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrates a large, smooth, central filling defect peripherally outlined by contrast material. The catheter is deviated to the patient's right. This finding is consistent with a large ureterocele.


Excretory urogram demonstrates the classic cobra-...

Excretory urogram demonstrates the classic cobra-head appearance of a ureterocele.

Excretory urogram demonstrates the classic cobra-...

Excretory urogram demonstrates the classic cobra-head appearance of a ureterocele.


Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrates a po...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrates a posterior urethral valve.

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrates a po...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrates a posterior urethral valve.


Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows grade I lef...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows grade I left VUR. Incidentally noted is vaginal reflux.

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows grade I lef...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows grade I left VUR. Incidentally noted is vaginal reflux.


Leonardo da Vinci was the first to describe and depict the UVJ. VUR was demonstrated experimentally in 1883, and the initial observation of VUR in humans was recorded in 1893. Reflux occurs naturally in some other species, including dogs, cats, and rabbits.

There is a documented association of VUR with congenital upper urinary tract abnormalities such as renal agenesis, multicystic dysplastic kidney, and obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ).

Recent studies

According to Fefferman et al, fluoroscopically captured images are adequate in documenting the absence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) on VCUG examinations, making radiographic spot images unnecessary and thereby reducing patient exposure to radiation. The authors retrospectively reviewed 65 VCUG exams, each consisting of fluoroscopically captured spot (FCS) images and corresponding digital radiographic spot (DRS) images. The diagnostic accuracy of the FCS images regarding binary characterization of reflux as negative or positive was 97.2%; the sensitivity of the FCS images was 92.6%; and the specificity of the FCS images was 98.6%.1

In a retrospective cohort study by Novak et al using data from the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies Registry, children with VUR were found to have a slower rate of progression to end-stage renal disease than children with renal aplasia, hypoplasia or dysplasia, and other causes of chronic kidney disease. In children with VUR as the cause of chronic kidney disease, the factors of older age, higher stage of chronic kidney disease, and history of urinary tract infection were significantly associated with the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease.2

Menezes and Puri, in a study of 251 siblings of 215 index patients with grade III to 5 VUR, noted that the familial nature of VUR is well recognized but that the screening of siblings for VUR remains controversial. In their study, the authors found that the incidence of sibling VUR is maximal in patients younger than 3 years and that reflux in these patients is usually high grade and associated with a higher incidence of renal scarring. Of the 251 siblings with reflux, 105 were diagnosed after a urinary tract infection and 146 after screening. A total of 207 siblings were younger than 3 years, and 44 were 3-6 years of age. Renal scarring was present in 35.5% of symptomatic siblings and in 15% of screened siblings. The authors recommended that screening be performed on all siblings who are younger than 3 years of index patients with grades III to V VUR.3

Pathophysiology

Renal scarring

Incomplete bladder emptying is a contributory factor, and post-voiding residual urine acts as a fertile incubation medium for urinary pathogens, predisposing children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) to pyelonephritis and resultant renal scarring.4 Radiologic evidence of renal scarring is present in 30-60% of children with VUR, and VUR is present in almost all children (97%) with severe renal scarring. However, most kidneys (60%) with acute cortical defects do not demonstrate reflux, which highlights that ascending urinary tract infection (UTI) is quite common despite the absence of demonstrated VUR.

The kidney is most susceptible to scarring from intrarenal reflux in the first year of life and probably at the time of first upper tract infection.5 Renal scars less frequently develop after age 5 years. New renal scars develop almost exclusively in the presence of UTI and intrarenal reflux, but the presence of intrarenal reflux alone does not equate with renal scarring. Infected urine is believed to cause an exudative reaction that leads to fibrosis and scarring of papillae. Intrarenal reflux is a phenomenon that is likely underreported due to its fleeting nature and occurrence at peak reflux.

Lower grades of reflux without bacteriuria probably cause no significant renal damage, although the subject has been debated.

Severity of reflux

The severity of VUR is directly related to the risk of pyelonephritis and subsequent renal scarring. VUR and renal scarring may lead to severe hypertension (in 10-20% of cases, mostly female), progressive renal insufficiency, and renal failure.

VUR is or has been present in 30-49% of children who have renal failure before age 16 years and in 20% of adults who have renal failure before age 50 years.

Reflux nephropathy is thought to be responsible for 10-30% of all cases of end-stage renal disease. Renal growth is impaired in patients with ongoing reflux and UTI. Spontaneous resolution of reflux or resolution after therapy allows for resumption of renal growth, but the affected kidney never catches up.

Frequency

United States

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) occurs more commonly in children who have had urinary tract infection (UTI) than in those with sterile urine, affecting about 0.4-1.8% of children without UTI, 14-35% of children with asymptomatic UTI, and 25-50% of children with symptomatic UTI undergoing voiding cystourethrography (VCUG).

In pediatric patients with UTI, an average of 35% (18-50%) are diagnosed with reflux. Some researchers hold that the prevalence of this condition in randomly selected children may be as high as 17%.

VUR is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with variable expression. The child of a parent with VUR has a 66% likelihood of having reflux and the sibling of a child with reflux has a 25-50% likelihood of being similarly afflicted. The risk of sibling reflux increases even further when evidence of renal damage is present in the index case.

About 75% of the siblings of patients are asymptomatic, and 20% of siblings of patients with dysfunctional voiding have reflux.

Mortality/Morbidity

The natural history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is that it resolves spontaneously in childhood at a rate of about 10-15% per year.

  • VUR resolves spontaneously before adolescence in approximately 90% of those with grade I reflux, in 80% of those with grade II reflux, in 50% of those with grade III reflux, in 10% of those with grade IV reflux, and essentially 0% in those with grade V reflux.
  • For grades I-III, the overall rate is approximately 80%.
  • Secondary reflux is not likely to improve spontaneously.

Race

Reflux is 10-20 times less frequent in black girls than in other girls.

Sex

Overall, about 75% of patients with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) are girls.

  • Urinary tract infection (UTI) is more frequent in girls than boys and occurs in school-aged children, with a female-to-male ratio of 20:1.
  • The frequency of renal scarring among girls with VUR is about 8 times that of girls without reflux.
  • In the prenatal period, VUR is suspected more frequently in boys than in girls, with a male-to-female ratio of 5:1. This ratio changes dramatically after birth, though there is disagreement regarding the incidence according to sex. Some authors note that follow-up studies of antenatally diagnosed reflux suggest a female-to-male ratio of 1.4:1 to 4.0:1, whereas others note a female-to-male ratio of 1:2.

Age

The average patient age at diagnosis is 2-3 years.

  • With the advent of prenatal sonographic screening, the evaluation for hydronephrosis and possible contribution of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is being performed in the neonatal and infant period.
  • Most cases of VUR resolve by about age 8 years, depending on the grade.

Anatomy

The pressure of bladder urine against the intravesical submucosal tunnel of the distal ureter effectively keeps it closed, except when ureteral peristalsis actively propels urine through it. The tunneled segment acts as a mainly passive 1-way valve. (There is a small contribution from the ureterotrigonal longitudinal muscles and ureteral peristalsis.)6

In primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), abnormal anatomic features are present: laterality of position, superior ectopia of a patulous ureteral orifice, a perpendicular (rather than oblique) course of the ureter through the bladder wall and a shortened intramural segment of ureter. The ratio of the submucosal tunnel length to the ureteral diameter is the primary factor determining the effectiveness of the normal valve mechanism. In healthy individuals, the ratio is typically 5:1, whereas it is about 1.4:1 in those with VUR. The intramural ureter increases in length from 0.5 cm at birth to 1.3 cm (adult length) by about age 12 years. The severity of reflux is proportional to the degree of anatomic abnormality.

Reflux is usually greatest and may be demonstrated only during the initiation or cessation of voiding, corresponding to the elevation in bladder pressure.

Intrarenal reflux favors the polar regions of the kidneys where there is a relative abundance of compound papillae that have larger, more perpendicularly oriented and concave duct orifices opening to the calyces. The obliquely oriented, slitlike convex duct orifices of the simple papillae found mostly in the mid kidney close readily with increased intrapelvic pressure, thereby preventing intrarenal reflux. Overall, at least two thirds of papillae in human kidneys are concave and have the potential to permit intrarenal reflux of urine.

Presentation

The relationship between vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and infection is close and complicated. Despite a few lingering disagreements, it is now commonly agreed that VUR of infected urine is the major cause of pyelonephritis in children. A child with reflux is more likely to have pyelonephritis than a child without reflux, yet there is no significant difference in the incidence of sterile (88-90%) and infected (10-12%) urine in children who do not have reflux compared with those who do. The issue of whether infection can produce significant VUR without some underlying abnormality has been a point of contention. Some reflux may occur secondary to urinary tract infection (UTI), but this generally resolves spontaneously with treatment of the infection and disappearance of the inflammatory changes at the UVJ.

The symptomatic presentation of VUR is almost always in conjunction with an associated UTI. Fever is considered the most important symptom in differentiating upper tract infection (pyelonephritis) from lower tract infection (cystitis). Distinguishing between the two on clinical grounds is difficult in young children.

An important risk factor for recurrent UTI and VUR is voiding and elimination dysfunction. This may be due to a small bladder volume, uninhibited bladder contractions, or bladder overdistention from willful infrequent voiding. Primary VUR takes 1.5 years longer to resolve in children with dysfunctional urinary and fecal elimination, and there are more breakthrough infections and reimplantation surgeries than in those without this condition. The diagnosis of dysfunctional elimination in patients with VUR is important because effective nonoperative treatments exist that have been shown to reduce the number of UTIs and promote the resolution of VUR. Some contrary data has recently been published where no association between the diagnosis of UTI or VUR and dysfunctional elimination in school-aged children of the general pediatric population.

VUR is the most common abnormality associated with complete ureteral duplication. Approximately 10% of children undergoing antireflux surgery have complete or incomplete duplication of the collecting system. In only 22% of patients with renal duplication does VUR spontaneously resolve. Imaging of completely duplicated ureters in patients with VUR most often follows the Weigert-Meyer rule: The upper pole, often obstructed, ectopic ureteral orifice inserts medial and caudal to the often refluxing lower pole ureteral orifice. Reflux occurs 3 times more often into the lower pole ureter.

VUR is associated with UPJ obstruction. The incidence of reflux in patients with UPJ obstruction has been reported as 5-24%. Deciding which of the two is the more significant lesion is sometimes a challenge in uroradiology.

Preferred Examination

Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is the screening urologic imaging study of choice. American urologists, pediatricians, and radiologists recommend this study to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), ureterocele (see Image 4), posterior urethral valves in boys (see Image 6), or bladder wall thickening (see Image 29).

Excretory urogram demonstrates the classic cobra-...

Excretory urogram demonstrates the classic cobra-head appearance of a ureterocele.

Excretory urogram demonstrates the classic cobra-...

Excretory urogram demonstrates the classic cobra-head appearance of a ureterocele.


Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows grade I lef...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows grade I left VUR. Incidentally noted is vaginal reflux.

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows grade I lef...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows grade I left VUR. Incidentally noted is vaginal reflux.


Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) show a large, dis...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) show a large, distended bladder with irregular and trabeculated margins. This patient had posterior urethral valves.

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) show a large, dis...

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) show a large, distended bladder with irregular and trabeculated margins. This patient had posterior urethral valves.


Up to 50% of children with proven urinary tract infection (UTI) undergoing VCUG have some degree of reflux. Sonography of the kidneys should be performed in conjunction with VCUG to document the size of the kidneys and to look for obstruction, hydronephrosis, or other congenital malformations.7

When VUR is found to distend the upper tract, postvoiding decompression at the upper tracts should be observed.

Limitations of Techniques

Reflux is generally intermittent and may escape detection on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). This difficulty may be compounded by the desire to limit the child's exposure to ionizing radiation as much as possible. The influence of body position on the occurrence and detection of reflux has not been well studied in children. Incomplete bladder filling decreases the sensitivity of the study.

Differential Diagnoses

Bladder, Cystitis
Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney
Posterior Urethral Valve
Reflux Nephropathy
Ureterocele

Other Problems to Be Considered

Megaureter
Neurogenic bladder
Bladder neck obstruction
Posterior urethral valve
Dysfunctional voiding

More on Vesicoureteral Reflux

Overview: Vesicoureteral Reflux
Imaging: Vesicoureteral Reflux
Follow-up: Vesicoureteral Reflux
Multimedia: Vesicoureteral Reflux
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Fefferman NR, Sabach AS, Rivera R, Milla S, Pinkney LP, Strubel NA, et al. The efficacy of digital fluoroscopic image capture in the evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Pediatr Radiol. Aug 29 2009;[Medline].

  2. Novak TE, Mathews R, Martz K, Neu A. Progression of chronic kidney disease in children with vesicoureteral reflux: the North American Pediatric Renal Trials Collaborative Studies Database. J Urol. Oct 2009;182(4 Suppl):1678-81. [Medline].

  3. Menezes M, Puri P. Familial vesicoureteral reflux--is screening beneficial?. J Urol. Oct 2009;182(4 Suppl):1673-7. [Medline].

  4. Mingin G. Vesicoureteral reflux, urinary tract infection and renal scarring: sorting it all out. J Urol. Nov 2008;180(5):1884-5. [Medline].

  5. Zaffanello M, Franchini M, Brugnara M, Fanos V. Evaluating kidney damage from vesico-ureteral reflux in children. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. Jan 2009;20(1):57-68. [Medline].

  6. Acar B, Arikan FI, Germiyanoglu C, Dallar Y. Influence of high bladder pressure on vesicoureteral reflux and its resolution. Urol Int. 2009;82(1):77-80. [Medline].

  7. Papadopoulou F, Anthopoulou A, Siomou E, Efremidis S, Tsamboulas C, Darge K. Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Radiol. Mar 2009;39(3):239-44. [Medline].

  8. Sjöström S, Jodal U, Sixt R, Bachelard M, Sillén U. Longitudinal Development of Renal Damage and Renal Function in Infants With High Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux. J Urol. Mar 18 2009;[Medline].

  9. Sjöström S, Bachelard M, Sixt R, Sillén U. Change of urodynamic patterns in infants with dilating vesicoureteral reflux: 3-year followup. J Urol. Nov 2009;182(5):2446-53. [Medline].

  10. Ziessman HA, Majd M. Importance of methodology on (99m)technetium dimercapto-succinic acid scintigraphic image quality: imaging pilot study for RIVUR (Randomized Intervention for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux) multicenter investigation. J Urol. Jul 2009;182(1):272-9. [Medline].

  11. Belman BA, Lowell RK, Kramer SA. Clinical Pediatric Urology. 4th ed. 2002.

  12. Chudleigh T. Mild pyelectasis. Prenat Diagn. Nov 2001;21(11):936-41. [Medline].

  13. Darge K. Diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux with ultrasonography. Pediatr Nephrol. Jan 2002;17(1):52-60. [Medline].

  14. Devriendt K, Groenen P, Van Esch H, et al. Vesico-ureteral reflux: a genetic condition?. Eur J Pediatr. Apr 1998;157(4):265-71. [Medline].

  15. Dunnick NR, Sandler CM, Newhouse JH. Textbook of Uroradiology. 3rd ed. 2001: 330-3.

  16. Hellstrom M, Jacobsson B. Diagnosis of vesico-ureteric reflux. Acta Paediatr Suppl. Nov 1999;88(431):3-12. [Medline].

  17. Joyner BD, Atala A. Endoscopic substances for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. Urology. Oct 1997;50(4):489-94. [Medline].

  18. Koff SA, Wagner TT, Jayanthi VR. The relationship among dysfunctional elimination syndromes, primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infections in children. J Urol. Sep 1998;160(3 Pt 2):1019-22. [Medline].

  19. Lebowitz RL, Olbing H, Parkkulainen KV, et al. International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr Radiol. 1985;15(2):105-9. [Medline].

  20. McNeil DR, Tukey JW. Higher-order diagnosis of two-way tables, illustrated on two sets ofdemographic empirical distributions. Biometrics. Jun 1975;31(2):487-510. [Medline].

  21. Noe HN. The current status of screening for vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol. Oct 1995;9(5):638-41. [Medline].

  22. Pollack HM, McClennan BL. Clinical Urography, Vol 1. 2nd ed. 2000.

  23. Ritchey ML, Bloom D. Report of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Urology meeting. Pediatr Nephrol. Oct 1995;9(5):642-6. [Medline].

  24. Sargent MA. What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux?. Pediatr Radiol. Sep 2000;30(9):587-93. [Medline].

  25. Shaikh N, Hoberman A, Wise B, et al. Dysfunctional elimination syndrome: is it related to urinary tract infection or vesicoureteral reflux diagnosed early in life?. Pediatrics. Nov 2003;112(5):1134-7. [Medline].

  26. Sillen U. Vesicoureteral reflux in infants. Pediatr Nephrol. May 1999;13(4):355-61. [Medline].

  27. Thrall JH, Ziessman HA. Nuclear Medicine: The Requisites. 2nd ed. 2001: 351-7.

Further Reading

Related eMedicine topics

Vesicoureteral Reflux (Pediatrics: surgery)

Vesicoureteral Reflux (Urology)

Reflux Nephropathy

Pyelonephritis, Chronic

Radiographic Evaluation of the Pediatric Urinary Tract

Clinical guidelines

Vesicoureteric reflux (VUR). In: Guidelines on paediatric urology.
European Association of Urology - Medical Specialty Society
European Society for Paediatric Urology - Medical Specialty Society. 2008 Mar. 6 pages. NGC:006510

Urinary tract infections in children. In: Guidelines on the management of urinary and male genital tract infections.
European Association of Urology - Medical Specialty Society. 2008 Mar. 13 pages. NGC:006488

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® urinary tract infection—child.
American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society. 1999 (revised 2006). 7 pages. NGC:005552

Clinical trials

Randomized Intervention for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR)

Determination of Voiding Patterns of Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Autologous Adipocytes Graft in Endoscopic Treatment in Vesico-Renal Reflux in Children






Keywords

vesicoureteral reflux, VUR, reflux nephropathy, posterior urethral valves, urinary tract infection, UTI

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Kevin F McCarthy, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Radiology, National Naval Medical Center
Kevin F McCarthy, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Veronica Rooks, MD, Military Chief of Pediatric Radiology, Pediatric Radiologist, Tripler Army Medical Center; Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Veronica Rooks, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of Program Directors in Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society for Pediatric Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Henrique M Lederman, MD, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, LeBonheur Children's Medical Center and St Jude Children's Research Hospital; Professor of Radiology and Pediatric Radiology, Chief, Division of Diagnostic Imaging in Pediatrics, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Henrique M Lederman, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Pediatric Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Eugene C Lin, MD, Consulting Radiologist, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.