eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Vascular/Interventional

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Diagnosis: Imaging

Author: Martin G Radvany, MD, FSIR, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Interventional Neuroradiology Fellow, Johns Hopkins Hospital
Coauthor(s): Venerando Seguritan, MD, Staff Radiologist, Radiology, The Radiology Group, Inc.
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Oct 2, 2008

Radiography

Findings


Radiograph shows calcification of the abdominal a...

Radiograph shows calcification of the abdominal aorta. The left wall is clearly depicted and appears aneurysmal; however, the right wall overlies the spine.

Radiograph shows calcification of the abdominal a...

Radiograph shows calcification of the abdominal aorta. The left wall is clearly depicted and appears aneurysmal; however, the right wall overlies the spine.


Calcification of the abdominal aortic wall is frequently evident on plain radiographs of the abdomen. Calcification is best seen on lateral views when the spine does not obscure the opposing walls of the vessel. When calcification can be clearly identified in the opposing aortic walls, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) can be diagnosed with the plain radiographic findings.

Degree of Confidence

If the classic eggshell appearance is present (see Image below and Image 2 in Multimedia), the degree of confidence is approximately 100%; however, this finding is present only in 50% of patients. Occasionally, only the anteroposterior or lateral abdominal image demonstrates the findings clearly. If abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are suspected, perform abdominal US or CT for confirmation. As such, negative plain radiographic findings do not exclude the diagnosis in any way.

The lateral view clearly shows calcification of b...

The lateral view clearly shows calcification of both walls. Abdominal aortic aneurysm can be diagnosed with certainty.

The lateral view clearly shows calcification of b...

The lateral view clearly shows calcification of both walls. Abdominal aortic aneurysm can be diagnosed with certainty.


False Positives/Negatives

A tortuous, calcified aorta can mimic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) unless both walls can be seen clearly. If the opposing walls are not calcified, the diagnosis cannot be made with certainty. In these cases, US, CT, or MRI must be performed if AAA is clinically suspected.

Computed Tomography

Findings


CT demonstrates an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The...

CT demonstrates an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The aneurysm was noted during workup for back pain, and CT was ordered after the abdominal aortic aneurysm was identified on radiographs. No evidence of rupture is seen (same patient as in Image 2 in Multimedia).

CT demonstrates an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The...

CT demonstrates an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The aneurysm was noted during workup for back pain, and CT was ordered after the abdominal aortic aneurysm was identified on radiographs. No evidence of rupture is seen (same patient as in Image 2 in Multimedia).


CT accurately demonstrates dilation of the aorta (see Image above and Image 3 in Multimedia) and involvement of major branch vessels proximally and distally. This information helps in determining the appropriate intervention, which may be either surgical or endovascular repair. CT also shows the other organs in the abdomen and demonstrates involvement or displacement of organs that can confuse the clinical picture. The location and number of the renal arteries, caliber of the aneurysm, degree of calcification, lengths of the neck and iliac artery, and presence of mural thrombus are readily assessed. CTA allows multiplanar assessment of the aneurysm and associated relevant vessels (visceral arteries, iliac and femoral arteries).

Degree of Confidence

CT has emerged as the diagnostic imaging standard for the evaluation of AAA with an accuracy that approaches 100%. A well-performed CT examination can reveal the extent of the aneurysm, as well as the involvement of other organs. Intravenously administered contrast agent is needed to obtain the full benefit of CT; however, a nonenhanced study accurately depicts AAAs. Three-dimensional reconstructions of state-of-the-art, multidetector-row, helical CT scans can help in preoperative planning and may replace the need for preoperative diagnostic angiography.

False Positives/Negatives

The administration of contrast material is essential for detecting dissection or ulceration of a vessel that might be missed without it. In the acute setting (eg, in a patient with back pain or an aneurysm), a false-positive diagnosis of rupture is possible if fluid resulting from another cause is seen in the abdomen. Conversely, an aneurysm or rupture can be missed in a patient who has recently undergone barium study because artifact can obscure the aorta.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings


MRI of a 77-year-old man with leg pain believed t...

MRI of a 77-year-old man with leg pain believed to be secondary to degenerative disk disease. During evaluation, an abdominal aortic aneurysm was discovered.

MRI of a 77-year-old man with leg pain believed t...

MRI of a 77-year-old man with leg pain believed to be secondary to degenerative disk disease. During evaluation, an abdominal aortic aneurysm was discovered.


MRI and MRA can be used to define the extent of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) (see Image above and Image 8 in Multimedia). The absence of iodinated contrast material and radiation are advantages of this modality. However, MRI is more sensitive to motion than CT because a patient must remain motionless for longer than with current multidetector-row helical CT technology. In addition, the remaining organs in the abdomen are not seen as well on MRIs because of motion.

Degree of Confidence

In technically well performed MRI and MRA, degree of confidence approaches 100%. These examinations clearly reveal the extent of the aneurysm; however, motion can cause artifacts that can render the results nondiagnostic. Patients must be able to remain motionless for longer periods than with CT to enable a diagnostic examination.

False Positives/Negatives

If prior abdominal surgery has been performed and if metal clips or devices were used, MRI may not be possible. If the metal is close to the aneurysm or if branch vessels or heavy calcification is seen, artifacts may obscure the vessel and result in a nondiagnostic study.

Ultrasonography

Findings


Ultrasonogram of a patient with an abdominal aort...

Ultrasonogram of a patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. This aneurysm was best visualized on a transverse or axial image. This patient underwent a conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Ultrasonogram of a patient with an abdominal aort...

Ultrasonogram of a patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. This aneurysm was best visualized on a transverse or axial image. This patient underwent a conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.


US is the screening examination of choice as a result of its relative availability, speed, and low cost (see Image above and Image 7 in Multimedia). US is operator dependent, unlike other modalities; therefore, operator experience is important. The abdominal aorta normally tapers as it extends distally. Any increase in its diameter is considered abnormal.

Degree of Confidence

If the abdominal aorta can be seen in its entirety, US provides a reliable, low-cost screening examination. Any increase in the size as the aorta travels distally is abnormal. However, in a patient who is obese or in whom the bowel is distended with gas, a complete examination of the aorta and proximal iliac arteries may not be technically possible. In such instances, another cross sectional imaging study (eg, CT, MRI) should be obtained.

False Positives/Negatives

A technically unsatisfactory examination may result from a large patient body habitus or a large amount of bowel gas, which results in incomplete visualization of the aorta. Thus, a false-negative result is possible if these limitations are not recognized.

Angiography

Findings


Arteriogram demonstrates an infrarenal abdominal ...

Arteriogram demonstrates an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. This arteriogram was obtained in preparation of an endovascular repair of the aneurysm (same patient as in Image 2 in Multimedia).

Arteriogram demonstrates an infrarenal abdominal ...

Arteriogram demonstrates an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. This arteriogram was obtained in preparation of an endovascular repair of the aneurysm (same patient as in Image 2 in Multimedia).


Lateral arteriogram demonstrates an infrarenal ab...

Lateral arteriogram demonstrates an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Demonstration of the superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery, and celiac artery on the lateral arteriogram in important to completely evaluate the extent of the aneurysm.

Lateral arteriogram demonstrates an infrarenal ab...

Lateral arteriogram demonstrates an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Demonstration of the superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery, and celiac artery on the lateral arteriogram in important to completely evaluate the extent of the aneurysm.


Angiography is often ordered for preoperative evaluation in patients with manifestations of atherosclerotic vascular disease such as renal artery stenosis or peripheral vascular disease.

Compared with other images, arteriograms currently enable better longitudinal measurements of aneurysms. The reason is that the catheters that are used to make these measurements follow the contour of the vessels and therefore allow better determination of the length of the aneurysm, as opposed to linear measurements obtained with CT. This information is not an issue for open surgical repair; however, it is important in endovascular repair. Catheters with radiopaque graduated markers are used, allowing measurement of the lengths of the aneurysm and the caliber of the vessel. These data are occasionally important for endograft placement, and they may not be clear from CT and CTA. Typically, 7-10 measurements are required to size an endovascular graft to an abdominal aortic graft. Much if not all of the sizing can be accomplished with thin-section contrast-enhanced CTA.

As CT algorithms for measuring aneurysms improve, the need for preoperative angiography will decrease. Angiography may be reserved for the most complex aneurysms in which endovascular repair is contemplated.

Angiography is often linked to embolization of the internal iliac artery in a patient in whom the procedure is necessary prior to endovascular repair. Examples of relevant conditions include an internal iliac artery aneurysm or an ectatic aneurysm ipsilateral to a common iliac artery that requires anchoring of the stent-graft in the ipsilateral external iliac artery.

Degree of Confidence

When abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is suspected, it is unlikely to be missed at angiography. In most cases, the morphology of an aneurysm can be clearly defined. If an aneurysm is suspected on the arteriogram, a cross sectional image should be obtained. Not only will it confirm the existence of an aneurysm, but other pathologic conditions that may affect the surgical intervention can be detected.

False Positives/Negatives

If a large amount of luminal thrombus is present, the true diameter of the aneurysm may be obscured unless the wall of the aneurysm has a substantial amount of calcification. This limitation leads to significant underestimation of the diameter of the aneurysm.

More on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Diagnosis

Overview: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Diagnosis
Imaging: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Diagnosis
Follow-up: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Diagnosis
Multimedia: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Diagnosis
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Upchurch GR Jr, Schaub TA. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am Fam Physician. Apr 1 2006;73(7):1198-204. [Medline].

  2. Tan JW, Yeo KK, Laird JR. Food and Drug Administration-approved endovascular repair devices for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. Jun 2008;19(6 Suppl):S9-S17. [Medline].

  3. Lovegrove RE, Javid M, Magee TR, Galland RB. A meta-analysis of 21,178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. Jun 2008;95(6):677-84. [Medline].

  4. [Best Evidence] Lederle FA, Kane RL, MacDonald R, Wilt TJ. Systematic review: repair of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Intern Med. May 15 2007;146(10):735-41. [Medline].

  5. Pearce WH, Shively VP. Abdominal aortic aneurysm as a complex multifactorial disease: interactions of polymorphisms of inflammatory genes, features of autoimmunity, and current status of MMPs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Nov 2006;1085:117-32. [Medline].

  6. Hirose H, Takagi M, Miyagawa N. Genetic risk factor for abdominal aortic aneurysm: HLA-DR2(15), a Japanese study. J Vasc Surg. Mar 1998;27(3):500-3. [Medline].

  7. Golledge J, Muller J, Daugherty A, Norman P. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pathogenesis and implications for management. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. Dec 2006;26(12):2605-13. [Medline].

  8. Rasmussen TE, Hallett JW Jr. Inflammatory aortic aneurysms. A clinical review with new perspectives in pathogenesis. Ann Surg. Feb 1997;225(2):155-64. [Medline].

  9. Salo JA, Soisalon-Soininen S, Bondestam S. Familial occurrence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Intern Med. Apr 20 1999;130(8):637-42. [Medline].

  10. Craig SR, Wilson RG, Walker AJ. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: still missing the message. Br J Surg. Apr 1993;80(4):450-2. [Medline].

  11. Alexander S, Bosch JL, Hendriks JM, Visser JJ, Van Sambeek MR. The 30-day mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of gender, age, diameter and comorbidities. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). Oct 2008;49(5):633-7. [Medline].

  12. Harthun NL. Current issues in the treatment of women with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Gend Med. Mar 2008;5(1):36-43. [Medline].

  13. Blanchard JF. Epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Epidemiol Rev. 1999;21(2):207-21. [Medline].

  14. Rehm JP, Grange JJ, Baxter BT. The formation of aneurysms. Semin Vasc Surg. Sep 1998;11(3):193-202. [Medline].

  15. Ahn SS, Rutherford RB, Johnston KW. Reporting standards for infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. Feb 1997;25(2):405-10. [Medline].

  16. Hollier LH, Taylor LM, Ochsner J. Recommended indications for operative treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. Jun 1992;15(6):1046-56. [Medline].

  17. Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovasc. J Vasc Surg. Mar 1991;13(3):452-8. [Medline].

  18. Grollman J, Bettmann MA, Boxt LM. Pulsatile abdominal mass. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. Jun 2000;215 Suppl:55-9. [Medline].

  19. Rentschler ME, Baxter BT. Medical therapy approach for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm. Vascular. Nov-Dec 2007;15(6):361-5. [Medline].

  20. Rayt HS, Sutton AJ, London NJ, Sayers RD, Bown MJ. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Endovascular Repair (EVAR) for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. Sep 16 2008;[Medline].

  21. Muszbek N, Thompson MM, Soong CV, Hutton J, Brasseur P, van Sambeek MR. Systematic review of utilities in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. Sep 2008;36(3):283-9. [Medline].

  22. Wilt TJ, Lederle FA, Macdonald R, Jonk YC, Rector TS, Kane RL. Comparison of endovascular and open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). Aug 2006;1-113. [Medline].

Further Reading

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: recommendation statement .
United States Preventive Services Task Force.  1996 (revised 2005).  16 pages.  NGC:003960
 
Aortic aneurysm and dissection .
Finnish Medical Society Duodecim.  2004 Feb 26.  Various pagings. [NGC Update Pending] NGC:004359
 
Acute chest pain - suspected aortic dissection .
American College of Radiology.  1995 (revised 2005).  5 pages.  NGC:004621

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm, inflammatory aortic aneurysm, aortic aneurysm, AAAs, triple-A, triple A, abdominal aneurysm, noninflammatory aneurysms, inflammatory aneurysms, abdominal aortic dissection, aneurysm, dissection

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Martin G Radvany, MD, FSIR, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Interventional Neuroradiology Fellow, Johns Hopkins Hospital
Martin G Radvany, MD, FSIR is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Neuroradiology, International Society of Endovascular Specialists, Radiological Society of North America, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, and Western Angiographic and Interventional Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Venerando Seguritan, MD, Staff Radiologist, Radiology, The Radiology Group, Inc.
Venerando Seguritan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Eric P Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Strong Memorial Hospital
Eric P Weinberg, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Spencer B Gay, MD, Professor of Radiology, Director of Body Computed Tomography, Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Kyung J Cho, MD, FACR, William Martel Professor of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Fellowship Director, University of Michigan Health System
Kyung J Cho, MD, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.