Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Penetrating Chest Trauma Treatment & Management

  • Author: Rohit Shahani, MD, MS, MCh; Chief Editor: Jeffrey C Milliken, MD  more...
 
Updated: Nov 06, 2015
 

Approach Considerations

Any organ within the chest is potentially susceptible to penetrating trauma, and each should be considered when evaluating a patient with thoracic injury.[17] These organs include the chest wall; the lung and pleura; the tracheobronchial system, including the esophagus, diaphragm, thoracic blood vessels, and thoracic duct; and the heart and mediastinal structures.

There has been an incremental increase in the utilization of cardiothoracic surgeons over the last 10 years for thoracic trauma operative intervention; with little data available, this does appear to have resulted in improved patient outcomes.[18]

Next

Surgical Therapy

Chest wall injury

The chest serves the important functions of respiration and of protection of the vital intrathoracic and upper abdominal organs from externally applied force and is composed of the rigid structure of the rib cage, clavicles, sternum, scapulae, and heavy overlying musculature. Most wounds to these structures can be managed nonoperatively or by simple techniques such as tube thoracostomy. The treatment of a stable patient with a normal initial chest radiograph remains controversial.

Ammons and coworkers further defined the role of outpatient observation of selected patients with nonpenetrating thoracic GSWs and stab wounds. In their study, observation for 6 hours with subsequent repeat chest radiography revealed a 7% rate of delayed pneumothorax, and hospitalization was avoided in 86% of patients treated according to this protocol.

Large, open, chest wall defect closure can be a formidable task. When techniques involving closure with autogenous tissue of myocutaneous flaps based on the trapezius, rectus abdominis, pectoral, or latissimus dorsi muscles fail, prosthetic material (eg, polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, cyanoacrylate) may be used.

Rarely, chest wall hemorrhage from the muscular, intercostal, and internal mammary arteries can result in exsanguination and may require operative control.

First and second rib fractures are often accompanied by serious associated injuries, particularly if multiple rib fractures are evident. Treatment of any associated injuries must be expeditious.

Severe thoracic injury that causes paradoxical motion of segments of the chest wall has been termed flail chest, which may be categorized by size or location. In adults, pulmonary contusion accompanies flail chest injuries in approximately half the patients.

The primary treatment of chest wall injuries is a combination of pain control, aggressive pulmonary and physical therapy, selective use of intubation and ventilation, and close observation for respiratory decompensation. Sufficient evidence now supports the notion that the pathophysiologic findings associated with severe chest wall trauma are related to the underlying injuries, chiefly pulmonary contusion and parenchymal injuries, and have little to do with the movement of the chest wall.

Indications for operative fixation of the chest wall or sternum include the following:

  • Need for thoracotomy for other reasons
  • Large flail segments in patients with borderline premorbid pulmonary status
  • Severe instability and pain and failure to wean from the ventilator after an adequate trial
  • Secondary infections

Lung injuries

Injuries related to the pleural space can generally be divided into pneumothorax or hemothorax. Most patients with such injuries can be cared for with a simple tube thoracostomy. A massive hemothorax is defined as more than 1500 mL of blood in the pleural space. Usually, 200-300 mL of blood must collect in the pleural space before a hemothorax can be detected on a chest radiograph.

Although tube thoracostomy is often a lifesaving procedure and is relatively straightforward, it should not be taken too lightly. A review of almost 600 tube thoracostomies revealed a complication rate of 21%.[19]

Pulmonary parenchymal lacerations result in bleeding and air leaks, and the vast majority of these lacerations can be treated with tube thoracostomy. These lacerations extend from the surface of the lung toward the hilum or the trajectory of the penetrating object. They can vary from minor lacerations to lobar bisection. Of penetrating injuries that require thoracostomy, 80-90% can be managed using simple measures (eg, stapling, tractotomy, oversewing).

Fewer than 3% of all patients who require thoracotomy require a pneumonectomy, and this procedure is reserved for patients with severe hilar vascular injuries. Postoperatively, aggressive diuresis and selective lung ventilation may reduce the prevalence of pulmonary edema and stump dehiscence.

Tracheobronchial injuries

Up to 75-80% of penetrating injuries involve the cervical trachea, while 75-80% of blunt injuries occur within 2.5 cm of the carina. These injuries always occur with other injuries, especially to the great vessels; without early recognition and prompt intervention, they frequently are fatal.

Respiratory distress, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, hemoptysis, and mediastinal emphysema are the most common manifestations. Occasionally, complete or near-complete transection results in the "fallen lung" sign on chest radiographs. If possible, perform bronchoscopy on any patient in whom tracheobronchial injury is suggested. Patients with small injuries without appreciable leaks who do not require positive-pressure ventilation can be treated nonoperatively; however, most patients require urgent repair. The principles of operative repair include debridement with tension-free, end-to-end anastomosis while preserving the blood supply. The preferred suture technique is debatable but usually requires a monofilament suture with knots tied on the outside.

Delay or lack of recognition is common, and subsequent complications of stenosis and obstruction are the rule in missed tracheobronchial injuries.

Esophageal injuries

The exact prevalence of injury to the esophagus due to external trauma is unknown but is less than 1% of patients with injuries admitted to hospitals. The majority of esophageal injuries are due to penetrating trauma from a variety of instruments (ie, iatrogenic trauma).

Recognizing injury to the esophagus following trauma is difficult because of the rarity of injuries to this organ, the paucity of clinical signs in the initial 24 hours, and/or the presence of multiple other injuries. Delayed treatment results in the rapid development of sepsis and an associated high risk of death; therefore, any possibility of injury must prompt aggressive investigation, including radiography, endoscopy, and thoracoscopy (when warranted). The combined use of these techniques has a sensitivity of almost 100%.

Operative management is dictated by the site of primary injury, associated injuries, condition of the patient, degree of local suppuration, condition of the esophageal tissues, and delay since injury.

Primary repair with adequate tissue buttressing and drainage is the preferred method. Exclusion-diversion procedures have been advocated when primary repair is thought to be contraindicated. Esophageal replacement, when required, is, at best, a poor substitute for the original organ.

Complications after esophageal repair include esophageal leaks and fistulae, wound infections, mediastinitis, empyema, sepsis, and pneumonia. Long-term complications, such as esophageal stricture, are also possible.

Diaphragmatic injury

The diaphragm is frequently injured in penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma. Such injury occurs in 15% of stab wounds and in 46% of GSWs. Only 15% of the injuries are more than 2 cm long; therefore, herniation of abdominal contents is rarely immediate. Blunt injuries tend to result in larger lacerations.

Importantly, no distinctive signs and symptoms are associated with penetrating diaphragmatic injuries. A high index of suspicion is usually required for diagnosis.

Penetrating diaphragmatic injuries are frequently difficult to diagnose without laparoscopy or laparotomy. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage appears to be the best-studied procedure, although no consensus has been reached regarding the best RBC count to use. Newer diagnostic modalities, such as laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, can be useful in both diagnosing and treating penetrating diaphragmatic injuries.

In general, acute injuries are approached with laparoscopy or laparotomy because of associated injuries and chronic injuries are approached with thoracoscopy because of dense adhesions that arise between the abdominal contents and the lung. Most injuries require repair with heavy, nonabsorbable sutures; some large tears may require mesh closure. Lateral tears may require resuspension from the chest wall.

Up to 13% of injuries are missed in emergent settings, and the patient may present years later when visceral herniation occurs (85% within 3 y), manifesting as decreased cardiopulmonary reserve, obstruction, or frank sepsis. Bowel strangulation and gangrene are associated with a high mortality rate.

Thoracic great vessel injury

The great vessels of the chest include the aorta, its major branches at the arch (eg, innominate, carotid, subclavian), and the major pulmonary arteries. The primary venous conduits include the superior and inferior vena cavae and their main tributaries, as well as the pulmonary veins. Damage to vascular structures depends on the specific location and degree of vessel disruption; arterial injuries are more rapidly fatal. The prevalence of great vessel injuries ranges from 0.3-10%.

More than 90% of thoracic great vessel injuries are caused by penetrating trauma (ie, gunshot, shrapnel, stab wounds, therapeutic misadventures). Historically, thoracic injuries are associated with a high morbidity rate; however, Pate and coworkers reported a 71% survival rate in patients who reach the hospital alive after penetrating chest injuries. The trauma surgeon must resuscitate, diagnose, and treat the patient within minutes following admission to the trauma emergency unit.

A patient's hemodynamic stability dictates the next phase of managing a penetrating great vessel injury. Patients who are stable after initial resuscitation are best served by a further diagnostic workup. Helical CT, CT angiography, and transesophageal echocardiography offer several advantages over other diagnostic studies.

Helical CT is a noninvasive, sensitive test to assess mediastinal hematomas and to assess aortic wall and intraluminal abnormalities. The development of multidetector-row CT allows for significantly shorter acquisition times (<2 min for whole body CT scan), the ability to retrospectively reconstruct thinner sections, and improvements in 3-dimensional reconstructions. CT angiography is rapidly developing into a primary method of determining vascular injuries, obviating the much more invasive and operator-dependent conventional angiographic techniques, long held to be the criterion standard for assessment of vascular trauma. The role of transesophageal echocardiography is evolving.

While the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography to characterize and confirm traumatic aortic dissections is undisputed, it has only recently begun to be used directly in trauma evaluation. The lack of experienced operators in the emergency department setting is apparently being overcome, and continued exposure of the technique will undoubtedly increase its use in the evaluation of trauma patients. If required, conventional angiography or digital subtraction techniques are performed with a surgeon in attendance. The role of intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of the trauma patient has yet to be clarified.

Patients who remain in extremis or show continued rapid hemodynamic deterioration are best served by an emergency thoracotomy for rapid descending aortic cross-clamping and manual control of bleeding. Patients who are successfully resuscitated but remain hemodynamically unstable or who demonstrate continued massive blood loss are unable to undergo a further diagnostic workup and are immediately taken to the operating room.

A choice of proper incision in order to gain adequate exposure for control and repair of the injury is of prime importance. The median sternotomy with supraclavicular extensions for access to the subclavian vessels is the most useful incision. The posterolateral thoracotomy is the incision of choice for access to the descending thoracic aorta. The trapdoor, or book, incision has historic significance only.

Operative repair of thoracic aortic injuries is virtually always possible by lateral aortorrhaphy with extremely short cross-clamp times. Rarely, if ever, is an interposition graft required. Adjunctive measures of cardiopulmonary bypass, temporary bypass shunts, or active aortic shunts (eg, a centrifugal pump) are usually not described for use in patients with penetrating trauma but are almost exclusively used for blunt injury. Paraplegia has only rarely been reported following successful repair of penetrating thoracic aortic injury, even after prolonged aortic cross-clamping following emergency thoracotomy.

Because of the proximity of other organs to the thoracic great vessels, an additional diagnostic workup including bronchoscopy, esophagoscopy, and echocardiography may be necessary. The timing of these interventions continues to be debated. Patients with great vessel injuries have a higher prevalence of associated venous, esophageal, and bronchial plexus injuries compared with patients without great vessel injuries. Trauma patients with severe concomitant injuries who are unlikely to tolerate operative repair may be treated more frequently with endovascular stenting in the future. Mitchell's series of stent graft repair of thoracic aortic lesions includes 7 posttraumatic cases.

The Society for Vascular Surgery published data regarding the use of endovascular grafts in the treatment of acute aortic transections; 97% were due to a motor vehicle accident. Sixty symptomatic patients were treated with an aortic endograft, with a mean operative time of 125 minutes and an all-cause mortality rate of 9.1% at 30 days.[20]

Nonoperative treatment predominantly applies to patients with blunt aortic injuries who are unlikely to benefit from immediate repair (eg, minor intimal defects, small pseudoaneurysms). The long-term natural history of these minor vascular injuries remains uncertain; therefore, careful follow-up monitoring, including serial imaging studies, is a critical component of nonoperative treatment.

Cardiac injuries

Traumatic cardiac penetration is highly lethal, with case fatality rates of 70-80%. The degree of anatomic injury and occurrence of cardiac standstill, both related to the mechanism of injury, determine survival probability. Patients who reach the hospital before cardiac arrest occurs usually survive. Those patients surviving penetrating injury to the heart without coronary or valvular injury can be expected to regain normal cardiac function on long-term follow up.[21]

Ventricular injuries are more common than atrial injuries, and the right side is involved more often than the left side. In 1997, Brown and Grover noted the following distribution of penetrating cardiac injuries:[22]

  • Right ventricle - 43%
  • Left ventricle - 34%
  • Right atrium - 16%
  • Left atrium - 7%

The Beck triad (ie, high venous pressure, low arterial pressure, muffled heart sounds) is documented in only 10-30% of patients who have proven tamponade.[23]

Pericardiocentesis can be both diagnostic and therapeutic, although some centers report a false-negative rate of 80% and a false-positive rate of 33%. This procedure is reserved for patients with significant hemodynamic compromise without another likely etiology.

Echocardiography is a rapid, noninvasive, and accurate test for pericardial fluid. It has a sensitivity of at least 95% and is now incorporated into the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) protocol. Once again, the management algorithm is based on the patient's hemodynamic status, with patients who are in extremis or who are profoundly unstable benefiting from emergency thoracotomy with ongoing aggressive resuscitation. In patients with GSWs from high-caliber missiles, the absence of an organized cardiac rhythm portends a grave prognosis. For patients with stab wounds or GSWs from low-caliber missiles who are apparently lifeless upon arrival, resuscitative thoracotomy is justified.

Stable patients with cardiac wounds may be diagnosed using a subxiphoid pericardial window. Bleeding must be rapidly controlled using finger occlusion, sutures, or staples. Inflow occlusion and cardiopulmonary bypass are rarely necessary. Distal coronary injuries are usually ligated, whereas proximal injuries may require bypass grafts. Intracardiac shunts or valvular injuries in patients who survive are usually minor and do not require emergent repair. Foreign bodies in the left cardiac chambers must be removed.

Postoperative deterioration may be due to bleeding or postischemic cardiac myocardial dysfunction. Residual and delayed sequelae include postpericardiotomy syndrome, intracardiac shunts, valvular dysfunction, ventricular aneurysms, and pseudoaneurysms. Wall et al, in a classic 1997 paper, described in detail the management of 60 complex cardiac injuries.[24]

Previous
Next

Follow-up

For patient education resources, see the Procedures Center and Skin, Hair, and Nails Center, as well as Bronchoscopy and Puncture Wound.

Previous
Next

Complications

Retained pulmonary parenchymal foreign bodies

The decision to remove a retained foreign body depends on its size, its location, and any specific problems associated with it. Objects larger than 1.5 cm in diameter, centrally located missiles, irregularly shaped objects, and missiles associated with evidence of contamination may be prophylactically removed. Typically, such removal is best performed 2-3 weeks following the acute injury.

Chest wall hernia

A chest wall hernia is usually a complication of thoracotomy. A patient with a chest wall hernia presents with pain and an obvious defect, but occasionally a lung may be entrapped and become necrotic. Management includes resection of nonviable tissue and closure with tissue flaps or artificial material

Posttraumatic lung cyst

Pseudocyst of the lung is a rare development and usually manifests as a well-circumscribed, rounded, central air cavity identified on chest radiographs or CT scans. Most do not require specific treatment and resolve spontaneously within a few weeks. Patients with secondary infection present with a lung abscess and should be treated using standard therapy, including antibiotics and drainage.

Pulmonary hematoma

Hematomas form in 4-11% of patients with pulmonary contusions and are observed more frequently in patients with blunt trauma. Symptoms of fever and hemoptysis usually abate in 1 week, although chest radiograph findings usually demonstrate resolution within 4 weeks. Hematomas are associated with an increased prevalence of abscess formation.

Systemic air embolism

Systemic air embolism is usually described following central penetrating lung injury and is a special risk following primary blast injuries to the lungs. Air can enter the left side of the heart through bronchial and pulmonary venous fistulae and embolize to the coronary and systemic circulations. A precipitating factor is often the institution of positive-pressure ventilation with resulting air being forced into the low-pressure pulmonary venules. Embolism can also occur with any thoracic great vessel injury. Manifestations include seizures, arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest. Resuscitation requires thoracotomy, clamping of the pulmonary hilum, and aspiration of air from the left ventricle and ascending aorta. Experience with hyperbaric oxygen therapy has generally been good but is usually reserved for those centers with access to larger chambers (ie, to support associated medical personnel).

Bronchial stricture

Missed tracheobronchial laceration may result in significant strictures. Patients present with variable degrees of dyspnea. Evaluation with bronchoscopy and CT scanning is followed by treatment with open operative repair or stenting.

Tracheoesophageal fistula

Delayed tracheoesophageal fistula is rare, generally manifesting approximately 10 days following injury, possibly from delayed necrosis following a blast injury. Usually, the airway at or just above the carina is involved. The timing of surgery or intervention is unclear and depends on the degree of ventilatory leak and the overall condition of the patient.

Persistent air leak and bronchopleural fistula

Traumatic air leaks that last longer than 7 days are unlikely to resolve spontaneously, and judicious manipulation of the chest tube to increase or decrease the suction may be appropriate in order to facilitate healing. Bronchopleural fistulae imply a direct communication between the major airways and the pleural space and usually require some form of intervention for closure.

Empyema

Empyema occurs in 2-6% of patients with PCT. Traumatic empyema differs from nontraumatic forms because it is more often loculated and requires operative debridement. Initial treatment is tube drainage. Thoracoscopy, particularly if performed within 7-10 days, is effective for draining the infection.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia occurs in 9-44% of ventilated patients. It increases the mortality rate in patients who do not have ARDS from 26% to 48% and in patients with ARDS from 28% to 67%. Management consists of ventilator support and appropriate systemic antibiotic therapy.

Missile embolization

Embolization to the pulmonary arteries is usually treated with surgical removal or interventional techniques. A chest radiograph taken immediately preceding incision or intraoperative fluoroscopy is mandatory in order to detect more distal embolization that may occur during positioning. Asymptomatic patients with small distal fragments may be treated expectantly. Occasionally, missile emboli may migrate through a patent foramen ovale or from central parenchymal or vascular injuries to gain access to the left side of the heart and then to the systemic circulation.

Cardiovascular fistulae

Most cardiovascular arterial-to-venous fistulae occur following stab wounds. Virtually all manifest as a machinery murmur after approximately 1 week. Innominate artery-to-vein fistulae are the most common. Patients with coronary artery fistulae, usually to the right ventricle, present with ischemia, cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, or bacterial endocarditis. Aortocardiac, aortopulmonary, and aortoesophageal fistula are quite rare because the probability of survival from the acute injury is slim. While requiring open repair in the past, interventional techniques may be used in a large number of these patients.

Thoracic duct injury and chylothorax

Injuries to the thoracic great vessels may be complicated by concomitant thoracic duct injury, which, if unrecognized, may produce devastating morbidity due to severe nutritional depletion. Initial management of a delayed chylothorax is always aggressive but nonoperative. Hyperalimentation with total enteral foodstuff restriction (ie, parenteral hyperalimentation) may result in a significant number of spontaneously sealing thoracic duct injuries. Failure to spontaneously seal after 5-7 days indicates the need for surgical intervention, which should be individualized because the optimal approach is controversial. The number of proponents for direct suture control is equal to the number of those preferring a right thoracotomy to ligate the vessel as it traverses the diaphragm. Experienced personnel can approach the duct thoracoscopically or with video assistance, thus minimizing additional discomfort to the patient.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

The outcomes of treating patients with PCT are directly related to the extents of patients' injuries and the timeliness of initiation of treatments. Patients arriving in a stable condition may expect full recovery, but patients presenting with lesser levels of stability have diminishing probabilities of survival. Do not attempt to resuscitate, let alone definitively treat, patients presenting with no vital signs or with obviously nonsurvivable injuries (eg, massive cardiac destruction).

Guidelines for initiation of emergency department thoracotomy were published in 2003,[25] and the Eastern Association for the Study of Trauma published its own guideline in 2015.[11]

Reporting from a single center in 2010, patients who died had a significantly lower systolic blood pressure (42 ± 36 mm Hg) compared with those who survived (83 ± 27 mm Hg).[26]

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

The current management of penetrating thoracic injury is a hurried, brute-force approach necessitated by the life-threatening nature of many of these injuries. As surgical experience with less invasive techniques and minimal incision approaches increases, these methods will likely find their appropriate places in the treatment of these patients. Already, interventional radiologic techniques can safely treat many patients with intrathoracic vascular injuries and have been successfully used to retrieve intracardiac missiles. Traumatically disrupted aortae have been treated with stenting; in stable patients with penetrating injuries to the thoracic vessels, use of this modality should be considered. Currently, however, traditional approaches and techniques have little competition in the treatment of critically injured and frequently unstable patients.

The mechanism of thoracic injury in modern battles is shifting more from penetrating wounds to combination blast injuries. The mortality of those injured has increased (12% vs 3% in Vietnam) and may represent the devastation caused by IEDs and the subsequent multisystem injuries they cause. The overall killed-in-action rate has decreased, whereas the died-of-wounds rate has increased. Half of all thoracic injuries reported from the battle front on the Global War on Terror occurred in the civilian population.[6]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Rohit Shahani, MD, MS, MCh Consulting Staff, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Health Quest Medical Practice and Vassar Brothers Medical Center

Rohit Shahani, MD, MS, MCh is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Jan David Galla, MD, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center

Jan David Galla, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Aerospace Medical Association, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Cardiology, American College of Surgeons, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, Civil Aviation Medical Association, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Daniel S Schwartz, MD, FACS Medical Director of Thoracic Oncology, St Catherine of Siena Medical Center, Catholic Health Services

Daniel S Schwartz, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Western Thoracic Surgical Association, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jeffrey C Milliken, MD Chief, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California at Irvine Medical Center; Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine

Jeffrey C Milliken, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Heart Association, American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, California Medical Association, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Phi Beta Kappa, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, SWOG, Western Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. LoCicero J 3rd, Mattox KL. Epidemiology of chest trauma. Surg Clin North Am. 1989 Feb. 69(1):15-9. [Medline].

  2. Davis JS, Satahoo SS, Butler FK, Dermer H, Naranjo D, Julien K, et al. An analysis of prehospital deaths: Who can we save?. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Aug. 77 (2):213-8. [Medline].

  3. Demetriades D, Kimbrell B, Salim A, Velmahos G, Rhee P, Preston C, et al. Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system: is "trimodal" distribution a valid concept?. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Sep. 201(3):343-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  4. Knuth TE, Wilson A, Oswald SG. Military training at civilian trauma centers: the first year's experience with the Regional Trauma Network. Mil Med. 1998 Sep. 163(9):608-14. [Medline].

  5. Schreiber MA, Holcomb JB, Conaway CW, et al. Military trauma training performed in a civilian trauma center. J Surg Res. 2002 May 1. 104(1):8-14. [Medline].

  6. Capt Brandon W. Popper, MD, USAF MC, Capt Shaun M. Gifford, MD, USAF MC, et al. Wartime Thoraci Injury: Perspectives in Modern Warfare. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010. 89:1032-6. [Medline].

  7. Inci I, Ozcelik C, Tacyildiz I, et al. Penetrating chest injuries: unusually high incidence of high-velocity gunshot wounds in civilian practice. World J Surg. 1998 May. 22(5):438-42. [Medline].

  8. Herb A Phelan, MD, Sharla Gayle Patterson, MD, Moustaffa O Hassan, MD, et al. Thoracic Damage-Control Operation: Principles, Techniques, and Definitive Repair. J Am Coll Surg. Dec 2006. 206, No. 6:933-941.

  9. Guillermo Parra Sanchez, Edward W.K. Peng, Richard Marks, Pradip K. Sarkar. Sccop and Run' strategy for a resuscitative sternotomy following unstable penetrating chest injury. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2010. 10:467-469. [Medline].

  10. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Harken AH. Emergency Department Thoracotomy. Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, eds. Trauma. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000. 245-58.

  11. [Guideline] Seamon MJ, Haut ER, Van Arendonk K, Barbosa RR, Chiu WC, Dente CJ, et al. An evidence-based approach to patient selection for emergency department thoracotomy: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jul. 79 (1):159-73. [Medline].

  12. Casós SR, Richardson JD. Role of thoracoscopy in acute management of chest injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006 Dec. 12(6):584-9. [Medline].

  13. Mirvis SE. Imaging of acute thoracic injury: the advent of MDCT screening. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005 Oct. 26(5):305-31. [Medline].

  14. Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, Schroeppel TJ, et al. Initial chest CT obviates the need for repeat chest radiograph after penetrating thoracic trauma. Am Surg. 2007 Jun. 73(6):569-72; discussion 572-3. [Medline].

  15. Eric K. Hoffer. Endovascular intervention in thoracic arterial trauma. Injury. 2008. 39:1257-1274.

  16. Mandavia DP, Joseph A. Bedside echocardiography in chest trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004 Aug. 22(3):601-19. [Medline].

  17. Berg RJ, Karamanos E, Inaba K, Okoye O, Teixeira PG, Demetriades D. The persistent diagnostic challenge of thoracoabdominal stab wounds. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb. 76 (2):418-23. [Medline].

  18. Mollberg NM, Tabachnik D, Farjah F, Lin FJ, Vafa A, Abdelhady K, et al. Utilization of cardiothoracic surgeons for operative penetrating thoracic trauma and its impact on clinical outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug. 96(2):445-50. [Medline].

  19. Etoch SW, Bar-Natan MF, Miller FB, et al. Tube thoracostomy. Factors related to complications. Arch Surg. 1995 May. 130(5):521-5; discussion 525-6. [Medline].

  20. Dake MD, White RA, Diethrich EB, et al. Report on endograft management of traumatic thoracic aortic transections at 30 days and 1 year from a multidisciplinary subcommittee of the Society for Vascular Surgery Outcomes Committee. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Apr. 53(4):1091-6. [Medline].

  21. Carr J, Buterakos R, Bowling W, Janson L, Kralovich K, Copeland C, et al. Long-Term Functional and Echocardiographic Assessment After Penetrating Cardiac Injury: 5-Year Follow-Up Results. J of Trauma. March 2011. 70(3):701-704.

  22. Brown J, Grover FL. Trauma to the heart. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1997 May. 7(2):325-41. [Medline].

  23. Reed RL. Lung Infections and Trauma. Norton JA, Bollinger RR, Chang AE, Lowry SF, Mulvihill SJ, Pass HI, Thompson RW, eds. Surgery: Basic Science and Clinical Evidence. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2001. 1217-30.

  24. Wall MJ Jr, Mattox KL, Chen CD, Baldwin JC. Acute management of complex cardiac injuries. J Trauma. 1997 May. 42(5):905-12. [Medline].

  25. Hopson LR, Hirsh E, Delgado J, et al. Guidelines for withholding or termination of resuscitation in prehospital traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: joint position statement of the national association of EMS physicians and the american college of surgeons committee on trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jan. 196(1):106-12. [Medline].

  26. Serdar Onat, Refik Ulku, Alper Avci, Gungor Ates, Cemal Ozcelik. Urgent thoracotomy for penetrating chest trauma: Analysis of 158 patients of single center. Injury. 2010. In press:[Medline].

  27. Ammons MA, Moore EE, Rosen P. Role of the observation unit in the management of thoracic trauma. J Emerg Med. 1986. 4(4):279-82. [Medline].

  28. Asensio JA, Arroyo H Jr, Veloz W, et al. Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries: ongoing dilemma-which cavity and when?. World J Surg. 2002 May. 26(5):539-43. [Medline].

  29. Balci AE, Eren N, Eren S, et al. Surgical treatment of post-traumatic tracheobronchial injuries: 14-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 Dec. 22(6):984-9. [Medline].

  30. Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 27. 331(17):1105-9. [Medline].

  31. Boyd AD, Glassman LR. Trauma to the lung. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1997 May. 7(2):263-84. [Medline].

  32. Campbell DB. Trauma to the chest wall, lung, and major airways. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Jul. 4(3):234-40. [Medline].

  33. Cothren C, Moore EE, Biffl WL, et al. Lung-sparing techniques are associated with improved outcome compared with anatomic resection for severe lung injuries. J Trauma. 2002 Sep. 53(3):483-7. [Medline].

  34. Czermak BV, Waldenberger P, Perkmann R, et al. Placement of endovascular stent-grafts for emergency treatment of acute disease of the descending thoracic aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Aug. 179(2):337-45. [Medline].

  35. Demetriades D, Velmahos GC. Penetrating injuries of the chest: indications for operation. Scand J Surg. 2002. 91(1):41-5. [Medline].

  36. Deneuville M. Morbidity of percutaneous tube thoracostomy in trauma patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 Nov. 22(5):673-8. [Medline].

  37. Durham LA 3rd, Richardson RJ, Wall MJ Jr, et al. Emergency center thoracotomy: impact of prehospital resuscitation. J Trauma. 1992 Jun. 32(6):775-9. [Medline].

  38. Frame SB, Thompson TC. Blunt Cardiac Injuries. Maull KI, Cleveland HC, Feliciano DV, Rice CL, Trunkey DD, Wolferth CC Jr, eds. Advances in Trauma and Critical Care. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1995. Vol. 10: 15-42.

  39. Freedland M, Wilson RF, Bender JS, et al. The management of flail chest injury: factors affecting outcome. J Trauma. 1990 Dec. 30(12):1460-8. [Medline].

  40. Freeman RK, Al-Dossari G, Hutcheson KA, et al. Indications for using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to diagnose diaphragmatic injuries after penetrating chest trauma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Aug. 72(2):342-7. [Medline].

  41. Gasparri M, Karmy-Jones R, Kralovich KA, et al. Pulmonary tractotomy versus lung resection: viable options in penetrating lung injury. J Trauma. 2001 Dec. 51(6):1092-5; discussion 1096-7. [Medline].

  42. Huh J, Milliken JC, Chen JC. Management of tracheobronchial injuries following blunt and penetrating trauma. Am Surg. 1997 Oct. 63(10):896-9. [Medline].

  43. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, et al. Timing of urgent thoracotomy for hemorrhage after trauma: a multicenter study. Arch Surg. 2001 May. 136(5):513-8. [Medline].

  44. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Shatz DV, et al. Management of traumatic lung injury: a Western Trauma Association Multicenter review. J Trauma. 2001 Dec. 51(6):1049-53. [Medline].

  45. Karmy-Jones RC, Wagner JW, Lewis JW Jr. Esophageal injury. Trunkey DD, Lewis FR Jr, eds. Current Therapy of Trauma. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mo: Mosby; 1999. 209-16.

  46. Mancini MC, Eggerstedt JM. Hemothorax. Medscape Reference Journal [serial online]. 2006. [Full Text].

  47. Mandal AK, Sanusi M. Penetrating chest wounds: 24 years experience. World J Surg. 2001 Sep. 25(9):1145-9. [Medline].

  48. Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Burch J, et al. Five thousand seven hundred sixty cardiovascular injuries in 4459 patients. Epidemiologic evolution 1958 to 1987. Ann Surg. 1989 Jun. 209(6):698-705; discussion 706-7. [Medline].

  49. Mattox KL, Johnston RH Jr, Wall MR Jr. Penetrating trauma. Pearson FG, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Hiebert CA, McKneally MF, Urschel HC Jr, eds. Thoracic Surgery. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. 1581-9.

  50. Melanson SW, Heller M. The emerging role of bedside ultrasonography in trauma care. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1998 Feb. 16(1):165-89. [Medline].

  51. Mitchell RS. Endovascular stent graft repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Jul. 9(3):257-68. [Medline].

  52. Pate JW, Cole FH Jr, Walker WA, et al. Penetrating injuries of the aortic arch and its branches. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Mar. 55(3):586-92. [Medline].

  53. Patselas TN, Gallagher EG. The diagnostic dilemma of diaphragm injury. Am Surg. 2002 Jul. 68(7):633-9. [Medline].

  54. Pons F, Lang-Lazdunski L, de Kerangal X, et al. The role of videothoracoscopy in management of precordial thoracic penetrating injuries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 Jul. 22(1):7-12. [Medline].

  55. Reynolds MA, Richardson JD. Chest wall and diaphragmatic injuries. Maull KI, Rodriguez A, Wiles CE III, eds. Complications in Trauma and Critical Care. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1996. 313-24.

  56. Richardson J, Carrillo E. Thoracic infection after trauma. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1997. 7(2):401-427. [Medline].

  57. Richardson JD, Flint LM, Snow NJ, et al. Management of transmediastinal gunshot wounds. Surgery. 1981 Oct. 90(4):671-6. [Medline].

  58. Robison P, Herman PK, Trinkle JK, Grover FL. Management of penetrating lung injuries in civilian practice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988. 95(2):184-190.

  59. Stassen NA, Lukan JK, Spain DA, et al. Reevaluation of diagnostic procedures for transmediastinal gunshot wounds. J Trauma. 2002 Oct. 53(4):635-8; discussion 638. [Medline].

  60. Thomas MO, Ogunleye EO. Penetrating chest trauma in Nigeria. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005 Jun. 13(2):103-6.

  61. Wagner JW, Obeid FN, Karmy-Jones RC, et al. Trauma pneumonectomy revisited: the role of simultaneously stapled pneumonectomy. J Trauma. 1996 Apr. 40(4):590-4. [Medline].

  62. Wall MJ Jr, Storey JH, Mattox KL. Indications for thoracotomy. Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, eds. Trauma. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000. 473-82.

  63. Zakharia AT. Thoracic battle injuries in the Lebanon War: review of the early operative approach in 1,992 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985 Sep. 40(3):209-13. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Upright posteroanterior chest rediograph of patient with right-sided hemothorax.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.