eMedicine Specialties > Transplantation > Surgery

Renal Transplantation (Medical)

Dixon B Kaufman, MD, PhD, Director of Pancreas Transplantation, Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University

Updated: Jun 12, 2009

Introduction

Background

Kidney transplantation should be strongly considered for all patients who are medically suitable with chronic and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).1 A successful kidney transplant offers enhanced quality and duration of life and is more effective (medically and economically) than chronic dialysis therapy. Transplantation is the renal replacement modality of choice for patients with diabetic nephropathy and pediatric patients.

Currently in the United States, more than 100,000 persons are living with a functioning kidney transplant. This number represents 27% of the nearly 350,000 persons enrolled in the US ESRD program.

In 1973, Congress enacted Medicare entitlement for ESRD treatment to provide equal access to dialysis and transplantation for all patients with ESRD in the Social Security system by removing the financial barrier to care.2 Currently, the main obstacle is donor organ shortage.

History

Early experiments

Experimental intra-abdominal renal grafts were being performed in animals in the 1930s and 1940s. Autografts generally survived, although homografts were rejected. On December 25, 1952, Hamburger performed the world's first renal transplantation in a 15-year-old roofer who injured his solitary kidney. The donor of the graft was the patient's mother. The graft functioned immediately following surgery, but it unfortunately ceased to function on the 22nd postoperative day. The patient died 10 days later due to the unavailability of hemodialysis. However, this event had a considerable impact on the scientific community. Surgical inspection of the graft revealed that immunological rejection, rather than stenosis or thrombosis of the renal artery, led to graft failure.

Successful kidney transplantation


Joseph Murray and Hartwell Harrison performed the first transplantation of a kidney graft between identical twins on December 23, 1954. This success was followed by subsequent attempts by Murray and Merrill that led to 7 successful transplantations between identical twins in Boston. Most of the recipients of identical twin kidney grafts performed by Joseph Murray did well; some still have functioning kidneys more than 30 years after transplantation. However, the attempts at cadaveric renal transplantation universally resulted in graft failure due to rejection.

The first attempts to control the immune system used total body irradiation. In 1958, a Boston-area woman who was accidentally irradiated with 6 Gy received a functional renal graft, although the patient died from bone marrow aplasia. In 1959, Hamburger and Merrill irradiated 2 transplant recipients with a total dose of 4.5-4.8 Gy; the donors were nonidentical twins. Both of these recipients had successful outcomes. The patients survived 20 and 26 years, respectively. In June 1960, Kuss and colleagues were faced with rejection in a kidney transplant recipient who received the graft from an unselected donor. The use of 6-mercaptopurine in this patient, an immunosuppressive agent previously studied in animals, reversed the rejection process and ushered in the era of medications for the prevention and treatment of rejection. In 1964, Crosnier performed another cadaveric transplantation with long-term successful function.

In the early 1960s, the pioneering work of Thomas Starzl led to further advancements. His contributions were systematic studies using azathioprine and prednisone therapy to prolong graft survival. Following the demonstration of antilymphocyte serum efficacy by Waksman, Starzl conducted the first clinical trial of antilymphocyte globulin as an adjunct to azathioprine and prednisone in human kidney transplantation.

Long-term graft survival


At present, the 1-year patient survival rate for living donor transplants is 98%, and the 1-year patient survival rate for deceased donor transplants is 94%.3 The graft half-life for living donors is approximately 20 years, and the graft half-life for deceased donors is 12 years.

Data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for transplants performed in 2002-2004 show that the 1-year survival rate for grafts from living donors is approximately 95% and the rate for deceased donor grafts is approximately 89%.3 The half-life for grafts from living donors increased steadily from 12.7 to 21.6 years, and that for deceased donor grafts increased from 7.9 to 13.8 years. Kidney graft failure occurs because of chronic rejection, graft dysfunction, and nephrotoxicity, causing the patient to need dialysis and often a new organ. The development of new therapeutic approaches to prevent chronic rejection is needed to prolong the long-term survival of kidney transplants.

Pathophysiology

An increasing rise in ESRD coupled with a lack of donor organs has resulted in an average waiting time of more than 4 years for a deceased donor renal transplant.

Frequency

United States

The overall rate of ESRD is approximately 735/1,000,000. As the end-stage population continues to increase, projections estimate that the current population of 372,407 will exceed 660,000 by the year 2010.

In 2007, 6,037 kidney transplants from living donors and 10,082 deceased-donor kidney transplants were performed in the United States.4

Mortality/Morbidity

The 1-year life expectancy after kidney transplantation is 95-98%. The standardized mortality rate for patients on dialysis who are awaiting kidney transplantation is 6.3/100 patient-years. The standardized mortality rate with each treatment per 100 patient-years is as follows:

  • Dialysis - 6.3
  • Cadaveric transplant - 3.8
  • Living donor transplant - 2.0

Age

The proportion of patients either waiting for a kidney transplant or receiving a kidney transplant according to age is as follows:5

Age, YearsWait List, %Transplant, %
0-192.83.7
20-3931.233.6
40-5915.013.0
60-7039.537.2

Clinical

History

Candidates for renal transplantation undergo an extensive evaluation to identify factors that may have an adverse effect on outcome. Virtually all transplant programs have a formal committee that meets regularly to discuss the results of evaluation and select medically suitable candidates to place on the waiting list. Most programs perform the evaluation in the outpatient setting and possess a relatively uniform approach to the diagnosis and treatment of the pertinent medical and psychosocial issues affecting candidacy.

  • Preexisting morbidities of the transplant candidate with renal disease
    • Hematologic abnormalities, such as anemia and platelet-hemostatic dysfunction
    • Upper and lower gastrointestinal track abnormalities, such as gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, diverticulosis, diverticulitis, spontaneous colonic perforation, and prolonged adynamic ileus (pseudo-obstruction)
    • Hepatic abnormalities, such as viral hepatitis B and C (For more information, see Emerging Issues in Hepatitis C Virus–Positive Liver Kidney Transplant Recipients.)
    • The cardiovascular system is profoundly affected in patients with chronic or end-stage renal failure. The increased mortality is related to hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease with myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and left ventricular hypertrophy.
    • Bone and joint disease is common in these patients because of low calcium levels, high phosphorus concentrations, and elevated serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels.

Causes

  • A diverse array of diseases destroys renal function in all age groups. The most common etiologies of renal disease leading to kidney transplantation are the following:
    • Diabetes – 31%
    • Chronic glomerulonephritis – 28%
    • Polycystic kidney disease – 12%
    • Nephrosclerosis (hypertensive) – 9%
    • Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) – 3%
    • Interstitial nephritis – 3%
  • Understanding the etiology of renal disease is important because the primary renal pathology may influence the outcome based on the propensity for recurrence of disease and the association of comorbidities.

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • Pretransplantation recipient laboratory evaluation: Emphasize identifying and treating all coexisting medical problems that may increase the morbidity and mortality rates of the surgical procedure and adversely impact the posttransplant course. In addition to a thorough medical evaluation, evaluate the social issues of the patient to determine conditions that may jeopardize the outcome of transplantation, such as financial and travel restraints or a pattern of noncompliance.
  • Pertinent components include the following:
    • Blood chemistries
    • Liver function tests
    • Complete blood count
    • Coagulation profile
  • Infectious profile
    • Hepatitis B and C serologies
    • Epstein-Barr virus serologies (immunoglobulin M [IgM] and immunoglobulin G [IgG])
    • Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serologies (IgM and IgG)
    • Varicella-zoster serologies (IgM and IgG)
    • Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test for syphilis
    • HIV
    • Purified protein derivative (PPD) - Tuberculosis skin test with anergy panel, when indicated
  • Urinalysis, urine culture, and cytospin (when indicated)

Imaging Studies

  • A complete cardiac workup including angiography is not necessary in every patient. However, individuals with a significant history, symptoms, type I diabetes, or hypertensive renal disease should undergo a thorough evaluation to rule out significant coronary artery disease.
    • ECG (12 lead)
    • Chest radiograph (posteroanterior [PA] and lateral)
    • Exercise and dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy
    • Two-dimensional echocardiography with Doppler (+/- dobutamine)
    • Coronary arteriogram (if indicated)
  • Special procedures in selected patients are dictated by findings revealed on history and physical examination.
    • Upper GI endoscopy
    • Colonoscopy
    • Ultrasound of native kidneys
    • Peripheral arterial Doppler studies
    • Pulmonary function tests
    • Carotid duplex studies
    • Voiding cystourethrogram
    • Urodynamic pressure-flow studies

Other Tests

  • Recipients of kidney transplants undergo an extensive immunological evaluation that primarily serves to avoid transplants that are at risk for antibody-mediated hyperacute rejection. The immunologic evaluation consists of 4 components.
  • ABO blood group determination: This test is used to determine if the patient is a potential target of recipient circulating preformed cytotoxic anti-ABO antibody. Transplantation across incompatible blood groups may result in humoral-mediated hyperacute rejection.
  • Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing: All transplant recipients are tissue typed to determine the HLA class I and class II loci. Six HLA antigens are determined. The kidney donors also are HLA typed, and the degree of incompatibility between the donor and recipient is defined by the number of antigens that are mismatched at each of the HLA loci.
  • Serum screening for antibody to HLA phenotypes
    • Sensitization to histocompatibility antigens is of great concern in certain populations of transplantation candidates. This occurs when the recipient is sensitized because of receiving multiple blood transfusions, a previous kidney transplant, or from pregnancy.
    • Transplantation of a kidney into a recipient who is sensitized against donor class I HLA antigens puts the recipient at high risk of developing hyperacute antibody-mediated rejection. All transplantation candidates are screened to determine the degree of humoral sensitization to HLA antigens.
  • Crossmatching: This is an in vitro assay method that determines whether a potential transplant recipient has preformed anti-HLA class I antibodies against those of the kidney donor. This immunologic test is conducted prior to transplantation. A negative crossmatch must be obtained prior to accepting a kidney for transplantation.

Procedures

  • The medical workup may reveal circumstances that require surgical intervention to prepare the patient for kidney transplantation.
  • Pretransplant native kidney nephrectomy/nephroureterectomy: This is no longer a routine pretransplantation procedure. The native kidneys are left in place because they may still produce significant volumes of urine, secrete erythropoietin, and activate vitamin D. Nephrectomy/nephroureterectomy is reserved for specific indications, such as large polycystic kidneys, significant proteinuria, and chronic reflux disease.
  • Pretransplant cholecystectomy: Ultrasonographic evidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic gallstones is an indication. The mortality and morbidity of acute cholecystitis is significant in transplant recipients who are immunosuppressed.
  • Splenectomy: This is no longer a requisite pretransplantation surgical procedure. However, splenectomy may be indicated as part of a protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations.
  • Multiple random blood transfusions: Once, this was associated with improved kidney transplant graft survival in the precyclosporine era. Currently, transfusion offers no clinical benefit, and the risk of sensitization is significant. In the setting of living kidney transplantation, donor-specific transfusion therapy also has been almost completely eliminated.

Treatment

Medical Care

The primary goal of short-term and long-term medical follow-up is enabling surveillance for signs and symptoms of renal allograft dysfunction.6

Renal parenchymal dysfunction has many etiologies. The clinical manifestation is typically an increase in serum creatinine level. Causes are numerous, and the differential diagnosis must be approached systematically.

The greatest considerations are rejection, nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors, and recurrence of native kidney disease. The time interval between transplantation and the rise in serum creatinine level is often helpful in determining the etiology of graft dysfunction.

  • Delayed graft function immediately posttransplantation is usually due to acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Frequency is variable among the different transplant centers and is approximated at roughly 20-30% of deceased donor transplants.
  • The nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus is dose-related. Occasionally, performing a renal allograft biopsy is necessary if the serum creatinine level does not respond to a reduction in dose.
  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) may be associated with endothelial injury associated with calcineurin inhibitors and the occurrence of CMV.7  A systemic process reveals anemia, reduced haptoglobin levels, rising lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and a peripheral blood smear with schistocytes, all of which are consistent with the diagnosis. At times, HUS and TMA can be confined to the kidney and not show any systemic findings. The definitive diagnosis, whether local or systemic, is made with the aid of renal allograft biopsy that shows glomerular microthrombi.
  • Recurrent renal disease in patients who have had kidney transplants accounts for less than 2% of all graft losses, though it affects as many as 10% of transplant recipients. A few diseases have a high risk of renal allograft loss, such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, HUS oxalosis, and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Diabetic nephropathy can recur in renal allografts, but the time to onset is similar to that seen in native kidneys and is an uncommon cause of graft loss.
  • Rejection
    • Hyperacute rejection of the renal allograft happens within hours of the transplant, and it occurs when circulating, preformed, cytotoxic, antidonor antibodies directed to the ABO blood group antigens or to the donor HLA class I antigens are present. No treatment exists, and nephrectomy is indicated.
    • Accelerated acute rejection is a very early, rapidly progressive, aggressive rejection reaction dependent on T cells.1  It can occur within the first week of transplantation. Immediate therapy with anti–T-cell antibodies and pulse corticosteroids may reverse the process. Approximately 50% of cases can be salvaged.
    • Acute tubular interstitial cellular rejection is the most common type of rejection reaction, with an incidence of approximately 20-25%. Typically, it occurs between 1-3 months posttransplantation. It is T-cell mediated, and injury is directed to the renal tubules. The criterion standard for diagnosis is renal allograft biopsy. Mild rejections may be successfully reversed with corticosteroids alone, whereas moderate or severe rejections may require the use of anti–T-cell antibodies, either polyclonal or monoclonal.
    • Chronic rejection is a slow and progressive deterioration in renal function characterized by histologic changes involving the renal tubules, capillaries, and interstitium. The precise mechanism of this disease is poorly defined and is an area of intense study. Application of conventional antirejection agents, such as corticosteroids or anti–T-cell antibodies, does not appear to alter the progressive course. Unfortunately, this is a major cause of kidney allograft loss, occurring later than 2 years posttransplantation.

Surgical Care

  • Wound complications: In patients who have undergone transplantation, risk factors for and the morbidity of wound complications are significant.
  • Bleeding: Kidney transplantation is a vascular surgery procedure; however, it is not an operation associated with much blood loss. Postoperatively, a life-threatening bleeding complication is very rare but could result from rupture of the arterial anastomosis from a mycotic aneurysm.
  • Vascular thrombosis: Acute arterial thrombosis occurs in 1% of all kidney transplantations. Salvage of the renal allograft is possible if diagnosed within the first one half hour of occurrence (during recovery in the postanesthesia recovery room). Rarely, venous thrombosis occurs. If it occurs, the kidney is usually unsalvageable. Often, the cause is never satisfactorily identified.
  • Urine leak: Leaks occur at the ureterovesical junction or through a ruptured calyx secondary to acute ureteral obstruction. Often, the etiology of early urine leak is due to necrosis of the tip of the ureter. Urine leaks manifest as diminished urine output, an increase in creatinine levels, and lower abdominal or suprapubic discomfort. Repair with minimal intervention may be attempted with either a percutaneous nephrostomy and drainage with internal stenting or through a cystoscopic retrograde approach. More aggressive treatment involves operative intervention with reimplantation of the ureter or a ureteroureterostomy, utilizing the ipsilateral native ureter.
  • Ureteral stenosis and obstruction: This is a relatively late complication, occurring months or years posttransplantation, that could result from ischemia of the ureter or a tight ureteroneocystostomy. Ureteral stenosis is manifested by elevated creatinine and hydronephrosis.
  • Lymphocele: This is a circumscribed collection of retroperitoneal lymph that originates from lymphatic vessels about the iliac vasculature and the hilum of the kidney. Significant secondary problems may arise if external compression of the iliac vein (causing leg swelling and discomfort) or compression of the transplant ureter (causing hydronephrosis and renal dysfunction) occurs. The standard principle is that intraperitoneal drainage of the lymphocele should be accomplished with either a laparoscopic or an open surgical approach, with marsupialization of the edges of the lymphocele.

Medication

Medications are used in renal transplantation for immunosuppression.

All kidney transplant recipients require life-long immunosuppression to prevent a T-cell alloimmune rejection response. Several new immunosuppressive agents have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), and several others are in clinical trials.

Two broad classifications of immunosuppressive agents exist: intravenous induction of antirejection agents and maintenance immunotherapy agents. No consensus exists about which is the single best immunosuppressive protocol, and each transplantation program uses various combinations of agents slightly differently.

The goals are to prevent acute and chronic rejection, to minimize drug toxicity and rates of infection and malignancy, and to achieve the highest possible rates of patient and graft survival.

Antirejection induction agents

Induction immunotherapy consists of a short course of intensive treatment with intravenous agents. Antilymphocyte antibody induction therapeutics vary and include polyclonal antisera, mouse monoclonals, and so-called humanized monoclonals. Polyclonal antisera, such as antilymphocyte globulin (ALG), antilymphocyte serum (ALS), and antithymocyte globulin (ATG), are equine, goat, or rabbit antisera directed against human lymphoid cells. The effect is to significantly lower and almost abolish the circulating lymphoid cells that are critical to the rejection response.

The agents are very effective at prophylaxis against early acute rejection, which is especially beneficial in managing the recipient with delayed graft function. The agents provide an effective immunologic cover during a period in which the calcineurin inhibitors are either delayed or given in subtherapeutic doses until graft function improves. Induction agents are used less often if immediate graft function occurs, such as in recipients of kidneys from living donors, especially HLA-ID grafts.


Daclizumab (Zenapax)

Humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to and blocks IL-2 receptor on surface of activated T cells.

Dosing

Adult

1 mg/kg/dose IV for 5 doses, beginning at time of transplant, then q14d

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

None reported

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Manage patients receiving the drug in facilities with adequate supportive medical resources


Basiliximab (Simulect)

Chimeric monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to and blocks IL-2 receptor on the surface of activated T cells.

Dosing

Adult

20 mg IV at time of transplant and repeated 4 d posttransplant

Pediatric

<2 years: Not established
2-15 years: 12 mg/m2 IV; not to exceed 20 mg
>15 years: Administer as in adults

Interactions

None reported

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Long-term effect on ability of immune system to respond to antigens is unknown


Antithymocyte globulin, rabbit (Thymoglobulin)

A purified immunoglobulin solution produced by the immunization of rabbits with human thymocytes that is used to treat acute rejection.

Dosing

Adult

1.25-1.5 mg/kg/d IV for 7-14 d

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

None reported

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; hypersensitivity to rabbit proteins

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Infection, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia may occur; adverse reactions include fever, chills, malaise, headache


Methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol, Adlone, Medrol, Depo-Medrol)

Steroids ameliorate delayed effects of immune reactions.

Dosing

Adult

250-1000 mg IV at time of transplant; taper for next 2-3 doses

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

None reported

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in active infection, diabetes, heart failure


Alemtuzumab (Campath)

Humanized monoclonal antibody against the CD52 antigen. The anti-CD52 antibody induces lympholysis from complement-mediated lysis or other effector mechanisms.

Dosing

Adult

30 mg IV for 1 or 2 doses

Pediatric

Not indicated

Interactions

None reported

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Has been associated with infusion-related events, including hypotension, rigors, fever, shortness of breath, bronchospasm, chills, and rash

Maintenance Immunosuppression

Several immunosuppressive agents are currently in use for maintenance immunotherapy in kidney transplant recipients. Optimal maintenance immunosuppressive protocol has not been developed. Maintenance immunosuppressive agents are required for the patient's entire life.


Prednisone (Sterapred)

Immunosuppressant for treatment of autoimmune disorders; may decrease inflammation by reversing increased capillary permeability and suppressing PMN activity.

Dosing

Adult

Administered as a taper beginning with approximately 60-20 mg/d PO over first month posttransplant; taper to approximately 5 mg/d PO qd over next y

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

Coadministration with estrogens may decrease prednisone clearance; concurrent use with digoxin may cause digitalis toxicity secondary to hypokalemia; phenobarbital, phenytoin, and rifampin may increase metabolism of glucocorticoids (consider increasing maintenance dose); monitor for hypokalemia with coadministration of diuretics

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; viral infection; peptic ulcer disease; hepatic dysfunction; connective tissue infections; fungal or tubercular skin infections; GI disease

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Abrupt discontinuation of glucocorticoids may cause adrenal crisis; hyperglycemia, edema, osteonecrosis, myopathy, peptic ulcer disease, hypokalemia, osteoporosis, euphoria, psychosis, myasthenia gravis, growth suppression, and infections may occur with glucocorticoid use


Azathioprine (Imuran)

Active component of azathioprine is 6-mercaptopurine. Acts as purine analog that interacts with DNA and inhibits lymphocyte cell division.

Dosing

Adult

1-3 mg/kg/d PO qd; not to exceed 150 mg/d

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

Toxicity increases with allopurinol; concurrent use with ACE inhibitors may induce severe leukopenia; may increase levels of methotrexate metabolites and decrease effects of anticoagulants, neuromuscular blockers, and cyclosporine

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; significant leukopenia

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Risk of leukopenia and (rarely) liver dysfunction; caution with liver disease and renal impairment; hematologic toxicities may occur


Mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept)

Inhibitor of enzyme IMPDH. Results in inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation. Used for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving allogeneic renal allografts

Dosing

Adult

1-1.5 g PO qd administered in divided doses, usually bid

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

May elevate levels of acyclovir and ganciclovir; antacids and cholestyramine decreases absorption, reducing levels (do not administer together); probenecid may increase levels of mycophenolate; salicylates may increase toxicity of mycophenolate

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Do not use with azathioprine; avoid if significant leukopenia develops


Cyclosporine (Sandimmune, Neoral)

Calcineurin inhibitors that diminish IL-2 production in activated T cells. These agents bind to the intracellular immunophilin cyclophilin, interfering with the action of calcineurin, which inhibits nuclear translocation of the NFAT.

Dosing

Adult

Dosed according to blood concentrations, typically the 12 h trough concentration range is: 150±50 ng/mL by TDx immunoassay; common starting doses are: 9±3 mg/kg/d PO administered in divided doses, usually 12 h apart

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

Drugs that increase cyclosporine levels include diltiazem, nicardipine, verapamil, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, clarithromycin, allopurinol, danazol, HIV protease inhibitors, and drugs that inhibit cytochrome P450IIIA; drugs that reduce cyclosporine levels include phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampin, and drugs that induce cytochrome P450IIIA

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Evaluate renal and liver functions often by measuring BUN, serum creatinine, serum bilirubin, and liver enzymes; may increase risk of infection and lymphoma; reserve IV use only for those who cannot take PO


Tacrolimus (Prograf)

Calcineurin inhibitor that diminishes IL-2 production in activated T cells. Binds to intracellular immunophilin and FKBP, interfering with the action of calcineurin, which inhibits nuclear translocation of the NFAT. FDA approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving allogeneic renal allografts.

Dosing

Adult

Dosed according to blood concentrations, typically the 12-h trough concentration range is 9±3 ng/mL by IMx immunoassay
Common starting doses are 0.125±0.05 mg/kg/d PO administered in divided doses usually, 12 h apart; IV dosing approximately 1/3 that of PO; administered as continuous infusion over 24 h

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

Tacrolimus levels may increase with diltiazem, nicardipine, clotrimazole, verapamil, erythromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, bromocriptine, grapefruit juice, metoclopramide, methylprednisolone, danazol, cyclosporine, cimetidine, and clarithromycin; tacrolimus levels may reduce with rifabutin, rifampin, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Has nephrotoxic effects; do not administer simultaneously with cyclosporine; tonic clonic seizures may occur


Sirolimus (Rapamune)

Inhibits lymphocyte proliferation by interfering with signal transduction pathways. Binds to immunophilin FKBP to block action of mTOR. FDA approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving allogeneic renal allografts.
Cyclosporine-sparing regimen has been FDA approved for patients with low-to-moderate rejection risk at 2-4 mo following transplantation. Regimen allows for cyclosporine to be withdrawn after 2-4 mo, which significantly decreases renal toxicity while maintaining similar antirejection effect.
Patients at high immunologic risk must be maintained on combination regimen of sirolimus, cyclosporine, and corticosteroids for first year following transplantation; high-risk patients defined as transplant recipients who are Black, repeat renal transplant recipients who lost a previous kidney transplant for immunologic reasons, and/or patients with high panel-reactive antibody (PRA) values.

Dosing

Adult

Low immunologic risk (coadministered with cyclosporine and corticosteroids)
Loading dose day 1 posttransplantation: 6 mg PO once
Initial maintenance dose beginning day 2 posttransplantation: 2 mg/d PO as single daily dose; obtain trough blood level between days 5 and 7 (target trough level [whole blood] is 10-15 ng/mL)
Low immunologic risk - Sirolimus dose following cyclosporine withdrawal
Gradually withdraw cyclosporine 2-4 mo following transplantation, then increase sirolimus dose (about 4-fold higher than when combined with cyclosporine and corticosteroid) to maintain target blood levels (target trough whole blood concentration of 16-24 ng/mL for remaining year after transplantation, then 12-20 ng/mL thereafter)
High immunologic risk
Loading dose day 1 posttransplantation: <15 mg PO once
Initial maintenance dose beginning day 2 posttransplantation: 5 mg PO as a single daily dose; obtain trough blood level between days 5 and 7 (target trough level [whole blood] is 10-15 ng/mL); use in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for first year following transplantation; after first year, consider adjusting immunosuppressive regimen on basis of patient's clinical status
Hepatic impairment: Decrease dose by one third

Pediatric

<13 years: Not established
>13 years and <40 kg:
Loading dose: 3 mg/m2 PO once
Maintenance dose: 1 mg/m2 PO qd
>13 years and >40 kg: Administer as in adults

Interactions

Drug levels and toxicity may increase with diltiazem, nicardipine, clotrimazole, verapamil, erythromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, bromocriptine, grapefruit juice, metoclopramide, methylprednisolone, danazol, cyclosporine, cimetidine, and clarithromycin; levels may reduce with rifabutin, rifampin, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine; administer sirolimus 4 h after cyclosporine

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

May exacerbate hyperlipidemia and thrombocytopenia; caution with hepatic impairment (decrease maintenance dose by one third); monitor blood sirolimus blood levels in pediatric patients, in patients with hepatic impairment, during coadministration of strong CYP450-3A4 inducers or inhibitors, or if cyclosporine dosing is markedly reduced or discontinued
Not recommended for use in de novo liver or lung transplantation; coadministration with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients increases hepatic artery thrombosis risk; bronchial anastomotic dehiscence (fatal in most cases) has been reported in de novo lung transplantation when sirolimus has been part of immunosuppressive regimen; increased susceptibility to infection and possible lymphoma development may result from immunosuppression

Follow-up

Further Outpatient Care

  • Improvements in surgical technique and the advent of more potent immunosuppressive agents have reduced early complications of renal transplantation. Greater emphasis is now placed on preventing late complications. This is accomplished in the outpatient setting by routine assessment of patients with transplants.
  • Possible complications include the following:
    • Hypertension
    • Hyperlipidemia
    • Metabolic bone disease
    • Chronic allograft nephropathy8

Complications

  • Chronic systemic immunosuppression is a double-edged sword. The same immunosuppressive effects that prevent rejection of the allograft pose a risk for development of malignancy and infectious diseases. Routine cancer surveillance is mandatory to assure rapid diagnosis and treatment of any malignancy.

Prognosis

  • Some of the most useful data on kidney transplantation has been collected by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). The outcome of kidney transplantation is superior in recipients receiving a kidney from a living donor.4 Within this category, recipients of sibling HLA-identical grafts do best.
  • UNOS percent graft survival data from 2005-2006 (1 y) and 2001-2006 (5 y)
    • Deceased donor kidneys (N = 8288)
      • Non-ECD (expanded criteria donors)
        • 1 year (92%)
        • 5 years (71%)
      • ECD
        • 1 year (85%)
        • 5 years (55%)
    • Living donor kidneys
      • 1 year (96%)
      • 5 years (81%)

Patient Education

  • For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Kidneys and Urinary System Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Kidney Transplant.

Miscellaneous

Special Concerns

  • Pregnant women have special obstetric considerations.
  • Newborns also have special considerations because they are more often born premature and have lower birth weights for expected ages.

References

  1. Suthanthiran M, Strom TB. Renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. Aug 11 1994;331(6):365-76. [Medline].

  2. Nissenson AR, Rettig RA. Medicare's end-stage renal disease program: current status and future prospects. Health Aff (Millwood). Jan-Feb 1999;18(1):161-79. [Medline].

  3. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). National Data, Kidney Graft/Patient Survival. OPTN Web site. Available at http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/latestData/viewDataReports.asp. Accessed June 12, 2009.

  4. McCullough KP, Keith DS, Meyer KH, Stock PG, Brayman KL, Leichtman AB. Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1998-2007: access for patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. Am J Transplant. Apr 2009;9(4 Pt 2):894-906. [Medline].

  5. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. Dec 2 1999;341(23):1725-30. [Medline].

  6. Meyers CM, Kirk AD. Workshop on late renal allograft dysfunction. Am J Transplant. Jul 2005;5(7):1600-5. [Medline].

  7. Zarifian A, Meleg-Smith S, O'Donovan R, Tesi RJ, Batuman V. Cyclosporine-associated thrombotic microangiopathy in renal allografts. Kidney Int. Jun 1999;55(6):2457-66. [Medline].

  8. Cornell LD, Colvin RB. Chronic allograft nephropathy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. May 2005;14(3):229-34. [Medline].

  9. Wong W, Venetz JP, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Pascual M. 2005 immunosuppressive strategies in kidney transplantation: which role for the calcineurin inhibitors?. Transplantation. Aug 15 2005;80(3):289-96. [Medline].

Keywords

renal transplantation, allotransplantation, kidney transplantation, kidney transplant, renal transplant, end stage renal disease, end-stage renal disease, end stage kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, ESRD, renal replacement, diabetic nephropathy, nephrectomy, organ transplant, organ transplantation, renal disease, kidney disease, diabetes, chronic glomerulonephritis, polycystic kidney disease, PKD, nephrosclerosis, hypertensive nephrosclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE, interstitial nephritis, renal allograft, kidney allograft

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Dixon B Kaufman, MD, PhD, Director of Pancreas Transplantation, Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
Dixon B Kaufman, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society of Transplant Surgeons, American Surgical Association, Association for Academic Surgery, Central Surgical Association, National Kidney Foundation, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society of University Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Laura L Mulloy, DO, FACP, Professor of Medicine, Chief, Section of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplantation Medicine, Glover/Mealing Eminent Scholar Chair in Immunology, Medical College of Georgia
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

George R Aronoff, MD, Director, Professor, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, Section of Nephrology, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine
George R Aronoff, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Federation for Medical Research, American Society of Nephrology, Kentucky Medical Association, and National Kidney Foundation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Michael E Zevitz, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Finch University of the Health Sciences, The Chicago Medical School; Consulting Staff, Private Practice
Michael E Zevitz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, and Michigan State Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN, Professor of Medicine, Section of Nephrology-Hypertension, Tulane University School of Medicine; Chief, Medicine Service, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System
Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, and International Society of Nephrology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Further Reading

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)