eMedicine Specialties > Trauma > Blood Loss and Trauma Management
Shock, Hemorrhagic: Follow-up
Updated: Sep 22, 2008
Follow-up
Further Inpatient Care
- The remainder of care is determined by the proximate course of the hemorrhagic shock.
- Patients with hemorrhagic shock are at risk for acute tubular necrosis, acute lung injury, transfusion-related acute lung injury, infections (principally nosocomial and related to operative sites or indwelling catheters), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, with its attendant risk of death. Discussion of each of these entities is beyond the scope of this article.
Inpatient & Outpatient Medications
- Patients with hemorrhagic shock are often unable to mount an appropriate bone marrow response in the acute setting with regard to red blood cell production. Using erythropoietin (40,000 U/wk) in combination with supplemental iron and vitamin C to boost production is useful. This strategy has been used successfully to decrease red blood cell transfusions in a large multicenter trial in Canada.
Transfer
- In general, few indications exist to transfer a patient who is in shock to a specialized facility. Ideally, all hospitals and physicians should be prepared to initially treat and stabilize the patient with exsanguinating hemorrhage. After control of the bleeding and reversal of acute shock, patients may be transferred to facilities that can treat additional injuries.
- The patient should be transferred by an advanced life support unit with the capability of blood transfusion en route.
- The decision for air ambulance transport instead of ground transportation is one that involves consideration of proximity, difficulty with the ground route, time en route, weather conditions, and availability.
- Patients may be transferred for ongoing management of the initial injury when the injury complex demands care that exceeds the resources or capabilities of the initially receiving facility. This transfer should be made from the transferring physician to the receiving physician without intermediaries.
Complications
- The primary complication is death.
- The entire spectrum of organ failures may be the sequelae of resuscitated hemorrhagic shock.
- The cascade of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) progressing to multiple organ failure syndrome (as described by the late Roger Bone, MD) complicates the cases of approximately 30-70% of patients who present with hemorrhagic shock and survive their initial resuscitation.
Prognosis
- Prognosis is related to the ability to be resuscitated from shock, as well as the underlying illness or injury, not the presentation of hemorrhagic shock.
Patient Education
- For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Shock Center and Public Health Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Shock and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR).
Miscellaneous
Medicolegal Pitfalls
- The primary pitfall is transfusing massive amounts of blood products into a Jehovah's Witness. This error occurs on occasion. Despite acting in the patient's best interest (prior to knowing that the patient would not want a blood transfusion), this error is a major incident for the patient. In this situation, honesty with the patient and the family member(s) is the rule. Involve the hospital's risk manager early. Family conferencing with a clergy member sometimes is helpful as well.
Special Concerns
- Blood substitute: There are recognized risks associated with the transfusion of large quantities of packed red blood cells. As a result, other modalities are being investigated. One such modality is hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOC). Clinical application has been limited by its toxic effect profile. However, research is ongoing on the use of these products.
- Hypertonic saline: In patients with hemorrhagic shock, hypertonic saline has the theoretical benefit of increasing intravascular volume with only small amounts of fluid. The combination of dextran and hypertonic saline may be beneficial in situations where infusion of large volumes of fluid may be harmful, such as in the elderly with impaired cardiac activity. Additional trials will be required before this combination is accepted as standard of care.
- See related CME at Blood Substitutes Linked to Deaths, MI.
More on Shock, Hemorrhagic |
| Overview: Shock, Hemorrhagic |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Shock, Hemorrhagic |
| Treatment & Medication: Shock, Hemorrhagic |
Follow-up: Shock, Hemorrhagic |
| Multimedia: Shock, Hemorrhagic |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Blalock A. Principle of Surgical Care, Shock, and Other Problems. St Louis: Mosby; 1940.
Ambrogi MC, Lucchi M, Dini P, et al. Videothoracoscopy for evaluation and treatment of hemothorax. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). Feb 2002;43(1):109-12. [Medline].
Barber AE, Shires GT. Cell damage after shock. New Horiz. May 1996;4(2):161-7. [Medline].
Brown MA, Casola G, Sirlin CB, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma: screening us in 2,693 patients. Radiology. Feb 2001;218(2):352-8. [Medline].
Butler K, Winters M. Shock: beyond the "golden hour". Emergency Medicine Reports. 2003;24:345-356.
Collins JA. The pathophysiology of hemorrhagic shock. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;108:5-29. [Medline].
Dizien O, Held JP, Eyssette M, et al. [Severe cranial trauma in the rehabilitation milieu. Management in the initial phase]. Rev Infirm. Mar 1993;43(5):33-8. [Medline].
Domsky MF, Wilson RF. Hemodynamic resuscitation. Crit Care Clin. Oct 1993;9(4):715-26. [Medline].
Falk JL, O'Brien JF, Kerr R. Fluid resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Clin. Apr 1992;8(2):323-40. [Medline].
Hollenberg SM. Cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Clin. Apr 2001;17(2):391-410. [Medline].
Kemp SF. Current concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of anaphylaxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2001;21:611-634.
Ketcham EM, Cairns CB. Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers: development and clinical potential. Ann Emerg Med. Mar 1999;33(3):326-37. [Medline].
Kramer GC, Kinsky MP, Prough DS, et al. Closed-loop control of fluid therapy for treatment of hypovolemia. J Trauma. Apr 2008;64(4 Suppl):S333-41. [Medline].
Krausz MM. Initial resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock. World J Emerg Surg. Apr 27 2006;1(1):14.
McCunn M, Karlin A. Nonblood fluid resuscitation: more questions than answers. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 1999;17:107-123.
Orlinsky M, Shoemaker W, Reis ED, et al. Current controversies in shock and resuscitation. Surg Clin North Am. Dec 2001;81(6):1217-62, xi-xii. [Medline].
Pearl RG. Treatment of shock-1998. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1998;suppl:75-84.
Peitzman AB, Billiar TR, Harbrecht BG. Hemorrhagic shock. Current Problems in Surgery. 1995;32:925-1002. [Medline].
Pryor JP, Pryor RJ, Stafford PW. Initial phase of trauma management and fluid resuscitation. Trauma Reports. 2002;3:1-12.
Schlag G, Krosl P, Redl H. Cardiopulmonary response of the elderly to traumatic and septic shock. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;264:233-42. [Medline].
Shoemaker WC, Peitzman AB, Bellamy R. Resuscitation from severe hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. Feb 1996;24(2 Suppl):S12-23. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
hemorrhagic shock, shock, hypovolemia, hypovolemic shock, exsanguination, bleeding, blood loss, hemorrhage
Follow-up: Shock, Hemorrhagic