Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Splenic Rupture Treatment & Management

  • Author: H Scott Bjerke, MD, FACS; Chief Editor: John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA  more...
 
Updated: Nov 24, 2014
 

Medical Therapy

The trend in management of splenic injury continues to favor nonoperative or conservative management. This varies from institution to institution but usually includes patients with stable hemodynamic signs, stable hemoglobin levels over 12-48 hours, minimal transfusion requirements (2 U or less), CT scan injury scale grade of 1 or 2 without a blush, and patients younger than 55 years. For instances in which patients have significant injury to other systems, surgical intervention may be considered even in the presence of the previously noted findings. Patients on anticoagulants, such as warfarin (Coumadin), and antiplatelet drugs, such as clopidogrel (Plavix), are clinically considered to be at an increased risk for delayed bleed, but this has not yet been confirmed in the surgical literature.

Recombinant factor VIIa has been used to avoid surgery in a pediatric patient but in light of both the cost of the drug and the lack of randomized clinical trials should be used only in extreme circumstances where risk of surgery outweighs the risk of massive thrombosis.[11]

Interventional radiology

Splenic angioembolization is increasingly being used in both stable responders and transient responders for fluid resuscitation under constant supervision by a surgeon with an operating room on standby. Femoral artery access with embolization of the splenic artery or its branches can be accomplished with gel foam or metal coils. Such treatment requires intimate cooperation between the trauma surgeon and the interventional radiologist. Not all hospitals will have the proper facilities for such treatment, and any surgeon contemplating splenic angioembolization for a patient should first make sure the hospital interventional radiology suite and personnel are set up for rapid response at any hour of the day.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Surgical therapy is usually reserved for patients with signs of ongoing bleeding or hemodynamic instability. In some institutions, CT scan–assessed grade V splenic injuries with stable vitals may be observed closely without operative intervention, but most patients with these injuries will undergo an exploratory laparotomy for more precise staging, repair, or removal. Adult surgeons may be more likely to operate in cases of splenic injury but less likely to transfuse than their pediatric surgical colleagues.[12]

Emergency celiotomy for hemoperitoneum with suspected splenic injury is performed through a midline abdominal incision. Subcostal or chevron incisions do not provide the opportunity to easily explore the lower abdomen for a hemorrhage site and cannot be performed as rapidly as a midline incision under emergency circumstances. Intestinal and mesenteric injuries may be missed, or they may be difficult to repair appropriately with subcostal incisions.

The splenic ligamentous attachments are taken down sharply or bluntly to allow for rotation of the spleen and the vasculature to the center of the abdominal wound and to identify the splenic artery and vein for ligation. Medial rotation also makes exposure of the hilum of the spleen easier and allows for possible identification of the splenic artery bifurcation. Once the splenic artery and vein are identified and controlled by ligation, the short gastric vessels are identified and ligated in similar fashion.

Ligating the splenic artery first, followed by the splenic vein, has the theoretical advantage of allowing some conservation of intrasplenic blood. In an emergency life-threatening situation, the amount of blood conserved is not worth the extra time it may take to isolate the vessels. Drains are typically unnecessary unless concern exists over injury to the tail of the pancreas during operation.

In less emergent situations, splenorrhaphy is the preferred method of surgical care. Multiple techniques are described in the literature, but they all attempt to tamponade active bleeding either by partial resection and selective vessel ligation or by putting external pressure on the spleen via an absorbable mesh bag or sutures. Both "make it yourself" and commercial products are available for this purpose. In patients with capsular injury, the electrocautery or argon beam coagulator device may provide adequate hemostasis and allow for splenic preservation.

A retrospective analysis by Wu et al compared the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) plus suture repair for splenic preservation with traditional splenic preservation surgery in 129 patients with traumatic splenic rupture. For the 35 patients receiving RFA plus suture repair, the mean time of operation was shorter (79 min ± 22 min vs 119 min ± 26 min); there was less bleeding during surgery (115 mL ± 67 mL vs 235 mL ± 155 mL); and there was less need for intraoperative transfusion (14% vs 36%). The RFA group also had significantly less postoperative bleeding and shorter hospital stays (7.1 days ± 1.4 vs 11.7 days ± 2.8).[69]

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

As most operations for splenic injury are a result of patient instability, standard emergency protocols are instituted, including obtaining 2 wide-bore (16F or larger) IVs for vascular access, 4-6 units of blood for surgery, nasogastric or orogastric tubes for decompression, and a Foley catheter to monitor urine output. Extensive blood work or coagulation profiles are rarely helpful in the emergent setting.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Good communication with the anesthesiologist minimizes the chances for iatrogenically induced problems. Opening the midline fascia on entry into the belly often results in decreasing pressure on the damaged spleen and increased bleeding with hypotension. Keeping the anesthesiologist informed of surgical progress and actions can minimize potential complications of this nature. In most trauma situations, all 4 quadrants of the abdomen are packed with laparotomy pads, which are removed as the search for the bleeding site commences. Presence of a splenic injury on CT scan does not preclude the potential of a bleeding mesenteric tear, consequently, all patients should have a thorough examination of the abdomen—even if preoperative studies show an isolated splenic injury.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

The postoperative course is usually 5-14 days, depending on associated injuries. Recurrent bleeding in the case of splenorrhaphy or new bleeding from missed or inadequately ligated vascular structures should be considered in the first 24-48 hours. The author's practice is to maintain a nasogastric tube on low intermittent suction for 48 hours to minimize the risk of a ligature failure on short gastrics with a distended stomach. Other authors prefer to suture ligate the short gastric vessels and to keep a nasogastric tube on low continuous suction to avoid this problem.

Patients should also be evaluated for immunizations against Pneumococcus species as a routine of postoperative management. Some authors and some centers also routinely vaccinate for Haemophilus and Meningococcus species. Various authors suggest immunization should be administered anywhere from 24 hours after injury to 2 weeks, citing studies of the improved physiologic response from vaccination after the immediate postoperative period. This must be weighed against the possibility of loss of follow-up care and missing the vaccination entirely. The author's practice is to immunize all patients prior to discharge.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends revaccination with pneumococcal vaccine after 4-5 years one time only. A third booster is not recommended because there is no proof it improves protection from postsplenectomy sepsis, but there is proof that it may cause serious adverse effects. Splenic function is difficult and expensive to measure. Unfortunately, little current data exist regarding the efficacy of surgical treatment, whether operative or conservative.

Patients should be warned about the increased risk of postsplenectomy sepsis and should consider lifelong antibiotic prophylaxis for invasive medical procedures and dental work. Although the lifelong incidence of postsplenectomy sepsis has been estimated to be 0.03-0.8%, the mortality rate of those developing the complication approaches 70%. Adequate education of the signs and symptoms of pneumococcal infection should be stressed.

Previous
Next

Complications

Complications of nonoperative care include delayed bleeding, splenic cyst formation, and splenic necrosis. Complications of splenorrhaphy include rebleeding and thrombosis of the residual spleen as well as complications related solely to the laparotomy.

Complications of splenectomy include bleeding from short gastrics or splenic vessels and the most feared but most rare complication, infection by encapsulated organisms such as Pneumococcus.

Material used for compression wrap of the spleen in splenorrhaphy is often woven and may mimic bubbles in an abscess on postoperative CT scans. Gel foam used for angioembolization may also falsely mimic an abscess on CT scans. Communication with the radiologist about the presence of splenic wrapping material on any postoperative CT scans will decrease the chance of this false-positive result.

Accessory splenic tissue and reimplantation of splenic tissue have never been reliably proven to minimize the risk of postsplenectomy sepsis. Once the spleen has been removed, patients should be considered to be at risk for encapsulated organism infections for the rest of their lives. Shatz et al noted improved postoperative response to immunization at day 14, with subsequent studies showing no further improvement at day 28.[13, 14]

Angioembolization of the spleen can result in noninfectious-related febrile events, sympathetic pleural effusions, and left upper quadrant abscesses. Femoral arteriovenous fistulas and iliofemoral pseudoaneurysms have also been reported.[15, 16]

Posttraumatic splenic pseudocysts are being reported more frequently now that nonoperative management has become the norm.[17] Optimal management is still unknown but probably requires partial or complete splenectomy to minimize morbidity and mortality.

Splenic abscesses and pancreatitis with sterile abscesses are being reported more frequently with Gelfoam embolization and with more proximal embolization procedures.[18, 19]

Thrombocytosis with platelet counts above 1 million/mm3 have been linked to thrombotic vascular events such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, or occlusive stroke. Although very little good data exist, many surgeons treat persistent thrombocytosis with a daily baby aspirin.

Pancreatic injury, pancreatitis, subphrenic abscess, gastric distension, and focal gastric necrosis have also been reported after both angioembolization and splenectomy for trauma.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Recent multi-institutional studies by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma demonstrate that mortality from splenic injury still occurs, even in Level 1 trauma centers. Overall, outcome from grade 1-2 splenic injuries remains excellent but not perfect, and outcome worsens as the injury grade increases.

Prognosis is usually excellent, but those patients left asplenic by their injuries and surgery increase the risk of fatal and debilitating infection for the remainder of their lives.

Numerous papers have recently emerged in the literature comparing the practice and the outcome in different levels of trauma centers and comparing trauma and nontrauma centers.[20, 21, 22]

The risk of complications or failure of nonoperative management appears to be worse in patients older than 55 years, and women older than 55 years are significantly more likely to fail nonoperative management with an increased mortality.

Multisystem injury or concomitant liver, pancreas, or bowel injury increases the likelihood of splenectomy. Improved splenic trauma care and salvage rates can be shown in both trauma centers and nontrauma centers, though treatment pattern differences are evolving. Operative treatment with isolated injury is more likely at low-volume centers, but overall salvage rates for nonoperative management are similar between low- and high-volume centers.

Isolated splenic injury is more likely to have nonoperative or interventional radiologic management in a trauma center, but observant management is also more costly in these centers. Patients with multisystem injury in informal and formal trauma systems are more likely to be transferred to a trauma center, and splenic salvage rates in these patients are less than with isolated injury.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Improvements in diagnostic technology, such as helical CT scanners and portable ultrasound, will go far to diagnose and stratify risk in patients with splenic injury. Future multi-institutional trials and data collection may make it possible to better identify those patients at risk for persistent bleeding and to minimize the need for operative intervention and splenectomy in all but a few patients. Improvements in knowledge of immunology may lead to more effective immunizations for patients who are asplenic and further minimize their risk of deadly infection.

Increased availability and ease of access to interventional radiologic equipment and personnel, especially in rural hospitals, may salvage splenic injuries that previously required operative intervention and splenectomy.

The controversy over when to operate, when to embolize and when to observe will likely continue for the next millennium, but the debate will spur the continued development of diagnostic and evaluative tools, further minimizing morbidity and mortality caused by splenic injury.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

H Scott Bjerke, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine; Medical Director of Trauma Services, Research Medical Center; Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences

H Scott Bjerke, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the History of Medicine, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American College of Surgeons, Midwest Surgical Association, Royal Society of Medicine, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Association for Academic Surgery, National Association of EMS Physicians, Pan-Pacific Surgical Association, Southwestern Surgical Congress, Wilderness Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Janet S Bjerke, RN, MBA, CCRC Research Coordinator, Trauma Services, Methodist Hospital of Indianapolis

Janet S Bjerke, RN, MBA, CCRC is a member of the following medical societies: Society of Critical Care Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Robert L Sheridan, MD Assistant Chief of Staff, Chief of Burn Surgery, Shriners Burns Hospital; Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Burns, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School

Robert L Sheridan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Received research grant from: Shriners Hospitals for Children; Physical Sciences Inc<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: SimQuest Inc -- consultant on burn mapping softwear ($1,500).

Chief Editor

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA Vice Chair and Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Medicine, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Director, Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital; American Gastroenterological Association Fellow

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association, American Physiological Society, American Society of Nephrology, Association for Academic Surgery, International Society of Nephrology, New York Academy of Sciences, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Disclosure: Received royalty from AMGEN for consulting; Received ownership interest from Ardelyx for consulting.

Additional Contributors

Lewis J Kaplan, MD, FACS, FCCM, FCCP Associate Professor of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Section Chief, Surgical Critical Care, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Lewis J Kaplan, MD, FACS, FCCM, FCCP is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American College of Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, Association for Surgical Education, Connecticut State Medical Society, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, International Trauma Anesthesia and Critical Care Society, Society for the Advancement of Blood Management, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Surgical Infection Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Harbrecht BG, Franklin GA, Miller FB, Richardson JD. Is splenectomy after trauma an endangered species?. Am Surg. 2008 May. 74(5):410-2. [Medline].

  2. Fishback SJ, Pickhardt PJ, Bhalla S, Menias CO, Congdon RG, Macari M. Delayed presentation of splenic rupture following colonoscopy: clinical and CT findings. Emerg Radiol. 2011 Dec. 18(6):539-44. [Medline].

  3. Ha JF, Minchin D. Splenic injury in colonoscopy: a review. Int J Surg. 2009 Jul 26. epub ahead of print. [Medline].

  4. Rozycki GS, Knudson MM, Shackford SR. Surgeon-performed bedside organ assessment with sonography after trauma (BOAST): a pilot study from the WTA Multicenter Group. J Trauma. 2005 Dec. 59(6):1356-64.

  5. Sirlin CB, Casola G, Brown MA. Patterns of fluid accumulation on screening ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma: comparison with site of injury. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Apr. 20(4):351-7.

  6. Hedrick TL, Sawyer RG, Young JS. MRI for the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma: a case report. Emerg Radiol. 2005 Jul. 11(5):309-11.

  7. Lin WC, Chen YF, Lin CH, Tzeng YH, Chiang HJ, Ho YJ. Emergent transcatheter arterial embolization in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury. Acad Radiol. 2008 Feb. 15(2):201-8. [Medline].

  8. Willmann JK, Roos JE, Platz A. Multidetector CT: detection of active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Aug. 179(2):437-44. [Medline].

  9. Nwomeh BC, Nadler EP, Meza MP. Contrast extravasation predicts the need for operative intervention in children with blunt splenic trauma. J Trauma. 2004 Mar. 56(3):537-41.

  10. Marmery H, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Richard H 3rd, Sliker C, Miller LA, et al. Correlation of multidetector CT findings with splenic arteriography and surgery: prospective study in 392 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr. 206(4):685-93. [Medline].

  11. Vick LR, Islam S. Recombinant factor VIIa as an adjunct in nonoperative management of solid organ injuries in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan. 43(1):195-8; discussion 198-9. [Medline].

  12. Sims CA, Wiebe DJ, Nance ML. Blunt solid organ injury: do adult and pediatric surgeons treat children differently?. J Trauma. 2008 Sep. 65(3):698-703. [Medline].

  13. Shatz DV, Schinsky MF, Pais LB, et al. Immune responses of splenectomized trauma patients to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine at 1 versus 7 versus 14 days after splenectomy. J Trauma. 1998 May. 44(5):760-5; discussion 765-6. [Medline].

  14. Shatz DV, Romero-Steiner S, Elie CM, Holder PF, Carlone GM. Antibody responses in postsplenectomy trauma patients receiving the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine at 14 versus 28 days postoperatively. J Trauma. 2002 Dec. 53(6):1037-42. [Medline].

  15. Killeen KL, Shanmuganathan K, Boyd-Kranis R. CT findings after embolization for blunt splenic trauma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Feb. 12(2):209-14. [Medline].

  16. Ekeh AP, McCarthy MC, Woods RJ. Complications arising from splenic embolization after blunt splenic trauma. Am J Surg. 2005 Mar. 189(3):335-9.

  17. Wu HM, Kortbeek JB. Management of splenic pseudocysts following trauma: a retrospective case series. Am J Surg. 2006 May. 191(5):631-4.

  18. Runyan BL, Smith RS, Osland JS. Progressive splenomegaly following splenic artery embolization. Am Surg. 2008 May. 74(5):437-9. [Medline].

  19. Hamers RL, Van Den Berg FG, Groeneveld AB. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis following inadvertent extensive splenic artery embolisation for trauma. Br J Radiol. 2009 Jan. 82(973):e11-4. [Medline].

  20. Bjerke S, Pohlman T, Saywell RM. Evolution, not revolution: splenic salvage for blunt trauma in a statewide voluntary trauma system--a 10-year experience. Am J Surg. 2006 Mar. 191(3):413-7.

  21. Harbrecht BG, Zenati MS, Ochoa JB. Management of adult blunt splenic injuries: comparison between level I and level II trauma centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Feb. 198(2):232-9.

  22. Carlin AM, Tyburski JG, Wilson RF. Factors affecting the outcome of patients with splenic trauma. Am Surg. 2002 Mar. 68(3):232-9.

  23. Amonkar SJ, Kumar EN. Spontaneous rupture of the spleen: three case reports and causative processes for the radiologist to consider. Br J Radiol. 2009 Jun. 82(978):e111-3. [Medline].

  24. Bain IM, Kirby RM. 10 year experience of splenic injury: an increasing place for conservative management after blunt trauma. Injury. 1998 Apr. 29(3):177-82. [Medline].

  25. Bain IM, Kirby RM, Cook AL. Role of the general surgeon in a British trauma centre. Br J Surg. 1996 Sep. 83(9):1248-51. [Medline].

  26. Barone JE, Burns G, Svehlak SA. Management of blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years. Southern Connecticut Regional Trauma Quality Assurance Committee. J Trauma. 1999 Jan. 46(1):87-90. [Medline].

  27. Bianchi JD, Collin GR. Management of splenic trauma at a rural, Level I trauma center. Am Surg. 1997 Jun. 63(6):490-5. [Medline].

  28. Caplan ES, Boltansky H, Snyder MJ. Response of traumatized splenectomized patients to immediate vaccination with polyvalent pneumococcal vaccine. J Trauma. 1983 Sep. 23(9):801-5. [Medline].

  29. Cathey KL, Brady WJ Jr, Butler K. Blunt splenic trauma: characteristics of patients requiring urgent laparotomy. Am Surg. 1998 May. 64(5):450-4. [Medline].

  30. Clancy TV, Ramshaw DG, Maxwell JG. Management outcomes in splenic injury: a statewide trauma center review. Ann Surg. 1997 Jul. 226(1):17-24. [Medline].

  31. Clancy TV, Weintritt DC, Ramshaw DG. Splenic salvage in adults at a level II community hospital trauma center. Am Surg. 1996 Dec. 62(12):1045-9. [Medline].

  32. Coburn MC, Pfeifer J, DeLuca FG. Nonoperative management of splenic and hepatic trauma in the multiply injured pediatric and adolescent patient. Arch Surg. 1995 Mar. 130(3):332-8. [Medline].

  33. Cocanour CS, Moore FA, Ware DN. Age should not be a consideration for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury. J Trauma. 2000 Apr. 48(4):606-10; discussion 610-2. [Medline].

  34. Cocanour CS, Moore FA, Ware DN. Delayed complications of nonoperative management of blunt adult splenic trauma. Arch Surg. 1998 Jun. 133(6):619-24; discussion 624-5. [Medline].

  35. Cochran A, Mann NC, Dean JM. Resource utilization and its management in splenic trauma. Am J Surg. 2004 Jun. 187(6):713-9.

  36. Cohn SM, Arango JI, Myers JG, Lopez PP, Jonas RB, Waite LL, et al. Computed tomography grading systems poorly predict the need for intervention after spleen and liver injuries. Am Surg. 2009 Feb. 75(2):133-9. [Medline].

  37. Daoud RA, Taghizadeh AK, Pickford RB. Conservative management of splenic trauma. J R Army Med Corps. 1999 Jun. 145(2):69-72. [Medline].

  38. Ekeh AP, Izu B, Ryan M, McCarthy MC. The impact of splenic artery embolization on the management of splenic trauma: an 8-year review. Am J Surg. 2009 Mar. 197(3):337-41. [Medline].

  39. Garber BG, Yelle JD, Fairfull-Smith R. Management of splenic injuries in a Canadian trauma centre. Can J Surg. 1996 Dec. 39(6):474-80. [Medline].

  40. Gaunt WT, McCarthy MC, Lambert CS. Traditional criteria for observation of splenic trauma should be challenged. Am Surg. 1999 Jul. 65(7):689-91; discussion 691-2. [Medline].

  41. Guth AA, Pachter HL, Jacobowitz GR. Rupture of the pathologic spleen: is there a role for nonoperative therapy?. J Trauma. 1996 Aug. 41(2):214-8. [Medline].

  42. Harbrecht BG, Peitzman AB, Rivera L, et al. Contribution of age and gender to outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults: multicenter study of the eastern association for the surgery of trauma. J Trauma. 2001 Nov. 51(5):887-95.

  43. Harbrecht BG, Zenati MS, Alarcon LH. Is outcome after blunt splenic injury in adults better in high-volume trauma centers?. Am Surg. 2005 Nov. 71(11):942-8; discussion 948-9.

  44. Ivatury RR, Simon RJ, Guignard J. The spleen at risk after penetrating trauma. J Trauma. 1993 Sep. 35(3):409-14. [Medline].

  45. Keller MS, Vane DW. Management of pediatric blunt splenic injury: comparison of pediatric and adult trauma surgeons. J Pediatr Surg. 1995 Feb. 30(2):221-4; discussion 224-5. [Medline].

  46. Kilic N, Gurpinar A, Kiristioglu I. Ruptured spleen due to blunt trauma in children: analysis of blood transfusion requirements. Eur J Emerg Med. 1999 Jun. 6(2):135-9. [Medline].

  47. Krause KR, Howells GA, Bair HA. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults 55 years and older: a twenty-year experience. Am Surg. 2000 Jul. 66(7):636-40. [Medline].

  48. Krupnick AS, Teitelbaum DH, Geiger JD. Use of abdominal ultrasonography to assess pediatric splenic trauma. Potential pitfalls in the diagnosis. Ann Surg. 1997 Apr. 225(4):408-14. [Medline].

  49. Lawson DE, Jacobson JA, Spizarny DL. Splenic trauma: value of follow-up CT. Radiology. 1995 Jan. 194(1):97-100. [Medline].

  50. Lucas CE. Splenic trauma. Choice of management. Ann Surg. 1991 Feb. 213(2):98-112. [Medline].

  51. Morrell DG, Chang FC, Helmer SD. Changing trends in the management of splenic injury. Am J Surg. 1995 Dec. 170(6):686-9; discussion 690. [Medline].

  52. Myers JG, Dent DL, Stewart RM. Blunt splenic injuries: dedicated trauma surgeons can achieve a high rate of nonoperative success in patients of all ages. J Trauma. 2000 May. 48(5):801-5; discussion 805-6. [Medline].

  53. Novelline RA, Rhea JT, Bell T. Helical CT of abdominal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999 May. 37(3):591-612, vi-vii. [Medline].

  54. Pachter HL, Guth AA, Hofstetter SR. Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management. Ann Surg. 1998 May. 227(5):708-17; discussion 717-9. [Medline].

  55. Peitzman AB, Heil B, Rivera L. Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional Study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma. 2000 Aug. 49(2):177-87; discussion 187-9. [Medline].

  56. Pisters PW, Pachter HL. Autologous splenic transplantation for splenic trauma. Ann Surg. 1994 Mar. 219(3):225-35. [Medline].

  57. Poulin EC, Thibault C, DesCoteaux JG. Partial laparoscopic splenectomy for trauma: technique and case report. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995 Aug. 5(4):306-10. [Medline].

  58. Ransom KJ, Kavic MS. Laparoscopic splenectomy for blunt trauma: a safe operation following embolization. Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb. 23(2):352-5. [Medline].

  59. Rappaport WD, McIntyre KE, Stanton C. The effect of alcohol in isolated blunt splenic trauma. J Trauma. 1990 Dec. 30(12):1518-20. [Medline].

  60. Rose AT, Newman MI, Debelak J. The incidence of splenectomy is decreasing: lessons learned from trauma experience. Am Surg. 2000 May. 66(5):481-6. [Medline].

  61. Rutherford EJ, Livengood J, Higginbotham M. Efficacy and safety of pneumococcal revaccination after splenectomy for trauma. J Trauma. 1995 Sep. 39(3):448-52. [Medline].

  62. Rutledge R, Hunt JP, Lentz CW. A statewide, population-based time-series analysis of the increasing frequency of nonoperative management of abdominal solid organ injury. Ann Surg. 1995 Sep. 222(3):311-22; discussion 322-6. [Medline].

  63. Schurr MJ, Fabian TC, Gavant M. Management of blunt splenic trauma: computed tomographic contrast blush predicts failure of nonoperative management. J Trauma. 1995 Sep. 39(3):507-12; discussion 512-3. [Medline].

  64. Shatz DV. Vaccination practices among North American trauma surgeons in splenectomy for trauma. J Trauma. 2002 Nov. 53(5):950-6. [Medline].

  65. Smith J, Armen S, Cook CH, Martin LC. Blunt splenic injuries: have we watched long enough?. J Trauma. 2008 Mar. 64(3):656-63; discussion 663-5. [Medline].

  66. vick lr. Undefined.

  67. Wasvary H, Howells G, Villalba M. Nonoperative management of adult blunt splenic trauma: a 15-year experience. Am Surg. 1997 Aug. 63(8):694-9. [Medline].

  68. Williams RA, Black JJ, Sinow RM. Computed tomography-assisted management of splenic trauma. Am J Surg. 1997 Sep. 174(3):276-9. [Medline].

  69. Wu Y, Wan L, Li P, Zhang Y, Li M, Gong J, et al. Application of radiofrequency ablation for splenic preservation. J Surg Res. 2014 Jul 22. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Hemisplenectomy (splenorrhaphy) with preservation of greater than 50% of splenic parenchyma.
Intra-parenchymal blush observed on helical CT scan.
Physical findings in postsplenectomy sepsis with peripheral thrombosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
Grade 4-5 splenic laceration on helical CT scan.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.