Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.


Electrical Injuries

  • Author: Brian J Daley, MD, MBA, FACS, FCCP, CNSC; Chief Editor: John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA  more...
Updated: May 09, 2014


Electrical injuries have become a more common form of trauma with a unique pathophysiology and with high morbidity and mortality. They encompass several types, as follows: lightning injury,[1] high-voltage injury, and low-voltage injury.[2, 3, 4] Clinical manifestations range from transient unpleasant sensations without apparent injury to massive tissue damage.[5] Some electrocutions are instantly fatal. Familiarity with the mechanisms of injury and the principles of therapy improves patient care.[6]

Four classes of electrical injuries are as follows[7] :

  • True electrical injuries - The person becomes part of the electrical circuit and has an entrance and exit site
  • Flash injuries - Superficial burns caused by arcs that burn the skin; no electrical energy travels through the skin
  • Flame injuries - Caused by ignition of the persons clothing by arc; electricity may or may not travel through the person’s body
  • Lightning injuries - A unique type of injury that occurs at extremely high voltages for the shortest duration; the majority of electrical flow occurs over the body

See the images below.

Arcing electrical burns through the shoe around th Arcing electrical burns through the shoe around the rubber sole. High-voltage (7600 V) alternating current nominal. Note cratering.
Contact electrical burn. This was the ground of a Contact electrical burn. This was the ground of a 120-V alternating current nominal circuit. Note vesicle with surrounding erythema. Note thermal and contact electrical burns cannot be distinguished easily.
Contact electrical burns, 120-V alternating curren Contact electrical burns, 120-V alternating current nominal. The right knee was the energized side, and the left was ground. These are contact burns and are difficult to distinguish from thermal burns. Note entrance and exit are not viable concepts in alternating current.
Electrical burns to the hand. Electrical burns to the hand.

History of the Procedure

Ever since Franklin's experiments with lightning, people have been fascinated with electricity; however, the widespread use of electricity and the application of electrically powered machinery have caused an increase in the number of electrical injuries.[8] Samuel W. Smith was the first person in the United States to die after electrocution by a generator in Buffalo, New York, in 1881.



To fully understand such injuries, understanding certain basic electrical principles is necessary.

Direct current (DC) flows in a constant direction. Batteries, for example, deliver direct current. High-voltage direct current is used as a means for the bulk transmission of electrical power.

Alternating current (AC) is an electric flow that regularly reverses its direction. Each forward-backward motion interval is called a cycle. Electric current in the United States alternates with a frequency of 60 hertz (Hz). The usual waveform of an AC power circuit is a sine wave, because this results in the most efficient transmission of energy, but, at the same time, it is also more dangerous than DC. AC is standard in US electrical outlets.

A volt is a unit of electromotive force or pressure that causes current to flow. In US household wiring, 120 volts are present between the hot wire and the ground wire. Most electrical shocks come from constant voltage sources; that is, the actual number of volts present does not change appreciably over time, despite variable current drainage from the source. Nonconstant voltage sources, such as cardiac defibrillators and capacitors, deliver varying voltages.

The use of a higher voltage leads to more efficient transmission of power; therefore, it is advantageous when transmitting large amounts of power to distribute the power with extremely high voltages (sometimes as high as hundreds of kilovolts). However, high voltages also have disadvantages, the main ones being the increased danger to anyone who comes into contact with them, the extra insulation required, and the increased difficulty in their safe handling.

An ampere is a unit of electrical current. More precisely, it is the flow of a certain number of electrons per second.

An ohm is a unit of electrical resistance. Conductance is defined as 1/resistance (ie, the inverse of resistance). The resistance of a material to current flow depends on the physical and chemical properties of the material. The amount of current flow often determines the magnitude of injury. Ohm law states that current is directly proportional to the voltage and inversely proportional to resistance (I=V/R) and can be useful for calculating the current flow during electric shock.[9, 10]

Heat generated in a material due to current flow is an indication of power. A watt is the unit of electrical power that is delivered when 1 ampere flows through 1 ohm for 1 second. Power is equal to voltage multiplied by current (P=VxI). Energy is defined in terms of a watt-second. One watt-second is equal to 1 joule. One watt of power delivered for 1 second produces 0.24 calories of heat.[9, 10]




Electrical injuries results in an estimated 1000 deaths per year and about 3000 admissions to specialized burn centers per year. Lightning injury causes 50-300 deaths per year in the United States, with the chances of being struck increased by wearing or carrying a metal object or simply being wet. Up to 40% of serious electrical injuries are fatal.[2, 3, 4] An epidemiological study of 383 cases in China underscores the need for stronger preventive measures.[11]



Approximately 20% of all electrical injuries occur in children, with a bimodal peak incidence highest in toddlers and adolescents. Most electrical injuries that occur in children are at home, with extension cords (60-70%) and wall outlets (10-15%) being by far the most common sources in this age group.[12] Electrical burns account for 2-3% of all burns in children that require emergency room care.

In adults, most electrical injuries happen at the workplace and constitute the fourth leading cause of work-related traumatic death. One third of all electrical traumas and most high-voltage injuries are job related. More than 50% of these occupational electrocutions result from power line contact (5-6% of all work-related deaths), and 25% result from using electrical tools or machines. The annual occupational death rate from electricity is 1 death per 100,000 workers, with a male-to-female ratio of 9:1.[4]



The 3 major mechanisms of electricity-induced injury are as follows:[6, 9, 10]

  1. Electrical energy causing direct tissue damage, altering cell membrane resting potential, and eliciting muscle tetany.
  2. Conversion of electrical energy into thermal energy, causing massive tissue destruction and coagulative necrosis.
  3. Mechanical injury with direct trauma resulting from falls or violent muscle contraction.

Factors that determine the degree of injury include the magnitude of energy delivered, resistance encountered, type of current, current pathway, and duration of contact. Systemic effects and tissue damage are directly proportional to the magnitude of current delivered to the victim. Current flow (amperage) is directly related to voltage and inversely related to resistance, as dictated by Ohm law (I=V/R; where I=current, V=voltage, R=resistance). Of the parameters described by Ohm law, voltage usually can be determined and is used to gauge the potential magnitude of current exposure and, therefore, the magnitude of injury.[6, 9, 10]

Electrical shock is classified as high voltage (>1000 volts) or low voltage (< 1000 volts). As a general rule, high voltage is associated with greater morbidity and mortality, although fatal injury can occur at household current (110 volts).

AC is substantially more dangerous than DC. Contact with AC may cause tetanic muscle contraction, preventing the victim from releasing the electrical source and, thereby, increasing the duration of contact and current delivery. Thoracic muscle tetany involving the diaphragm and intercostal muscles can result in respiratory arrest. The repetitive nature of AC increases the likelihood of current delivery to the myocardium during the vulnerable recovery period of the cardiac cycle, which can precipitate ventricular fibrillation. In contrast, DC usually causes a single violent muscle contraction, often thrusting the victim away from the source. Lightning is a unidirectional massive current that lasts from 1/10 to 1/1000 of a second, but often has voltages that exceed 10 million volts.

The most important difference between lightning and high-voltage electrical injuries is the duration of exposure to the current.[2, 3] Body tissues differ in their resistance. In general, tissues with high fluid and electrolyte content conduct electricity better. Bone is the tissue most resistant to the flow of electricity. Nerve tissue is the least resistant, and together with blood vessels, muscles, and mucous membranes offers a path of low resistance for electricity. Skin provides intermediate resistance and is the most important factor impeding current flow. Skin is the primary resistor against electrical current, and its degree of resistance is determined by its thickness and moisture. It varies from 1000 ohms for humid thin skin to several thousand ohms for dry calloused skin.

The current pathway determines which tissues are at risk and what type of injury is observed. Electrical current that passes through the head or thorax is more likely to produce fatal injury. Transthoracic currents can cause fatal arrhythmia, direct cardiac damage, or respiratory arrest.[13] Transcranial currents can cause direct brain injury, seizure, respiratory arrest, and paralysis.

Electrothermal tissue injury results in tissue edema; therefore, the development of a compartment syndrome can occur in any body compartment. The leg is the site most commonly involved for the development of compartment syndrome.

The current intensity will have a probable effect in the body, determined by the factors discussed above. There may be individual variation on the energy dose for a specific effect. Less energy is generally required in children, who have more water content and thin skin and, hence, better conductivity and less resistance, and in patients under moist conditions.

Current intensity and its expected clinical manifestation are outlined below:

  • 1 mA - Not perceptible, probable tingling sensation
  • 3-5 mA - "Let go" current for an average child
  • 6-8 mA - "Let go" current for an average woman
  • 7-9 mA - "Let go" current for an average man
  • 16 mA - Maximum current a person can grasp and "let go"
  • 16-20 mA - Tetany of skeletal muscles
  • 20-50 mA - Paralysis of respiratory muscles (respiratory arrest)
  • 50-100 mA - Threshold for ventricular fibrillation
  • Greater than 2 A - Asystole
  • 15-30 A - Common household circuit breakers
  • 240 A - Maximal intensity of US household current


Clinical presentations range from a tingling sensation to a widespread tissue damage and even to instantaneous death. The external resistance to electric flow is offered primarily by the skin and appendages and by the internal resistance of all other tissues, including nerves, blood, muscles, tendons, bone, and fat. Since the skin resistance can be affected by moisture, electric current can be transmitted to deeper structures before it causes significant skin damage. Electric current may be retained in the bones, causing heat and leading to necrosis and coagulation of small- to medium-sized vessels within the muscles and other tissues, almost completely sparing the skin.

Often, the main symptom of an electrical injury is a skin burn. A specific type of burn, called the "kissing burn," occurs at the flexor creases and is related to the current flowing through the opposing skin at the joint when the flexor muscles contract due to tetany. Not all electrical injuries cause external damage; high-voltage injuries may cause massive internal burns and coagulation necrosis along with edema and compartment syndrome.[14] Lightning injury usually causes superficial surface burns.[2, 3]

The heart can be damaged by direct necrosis to the myocardium and by cardiac dysrhythmias.[15] Cardiac arrhythmia can occur and range from benign to fatal. High voltage or DC current usually causes asystole, and AC current usually causes ventricular fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation is the most common fatal arrhythmia, occurring in up to 60% of patients in whom the current pathway goes from one hand to the other hand. The most common abnormalities seen on an electrocardiogram (ECG) are sinus tachycardia, nonspecific ST- and T-wave changes, heart blocks, and prolongation of the QT interval.[13]

The most common electrical injury seen in children younger than 4 years is the mouth burn.[12] These burns may cause facial deformities and growth problems of the teeth, jaw, and face. If a current travels close to the eyes, it may lead to cataracts. Cataracts can develop within days of the injury or years later.

Acute renal failure can complicate the hospital course due to acute tubular necrosis secondary hypovolemia from third spacing and huge volume shift. Rhabdomyolysis that results from massive tissue necrosis can also cause pigment-induced renal failure.

About two thirds of patients struck by lightning have ruptured eardrums. Autonomic dysfunction can cause pupils that are fixed and dilated or asymmetric, and this finding should not be used as a reason to stop resuscitation.[16] The "locking-on" phenomenon refers to a refractory state of neuromuscular stimulation with tetanic contractions that prevents the victim's hand to release the electrical source.

Electric burn patients may present with bone fractures from either severe muscle contractions (eg, avulsion fractures) or as a result of falls. This is more commonly seen in upper limb long bones and in vertebrae.



Indications to pursue an evaluation depend on the history. A thorough documentation is essential in the physical examination. As noted above, the type of injury depends on the voltage and the type of current.[17] A low threshold for fasciotomy is indicated because an early fasciotomy may prevent limb ischemia and also may prevent or limit the extent of amputation. Importantly, remember that the superficial appearance of an electrical burn may underestimate the degree of underlying tissue destruction.


Relevant Anatomy

Current travels down the path of least resistance. Nerve and muscle tissues have lower resistance than skin tissue. Understanding that an injured extremity may not show external signs of injury is important. Moreover, injury to deeper tissues may lead to edema and increased intracompartmental pressure.



The liberal indications for fasciotomy cannot be overemphasized because the morbidity associated with a failure to perform a needed fasciotomy far outweighs that caused by the procedure itself. The most important contraindication would be the failure to treat more severely life-threatening injuries or complications of electrical shock or a failure to adequately resuscitate the patient prior to surgical intervention.

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Brian J Daley, MD, MBA, FACS, FCCP, CNSC Professor and Program Director, Department of Surgery, Chief, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine

Brian J Daley, MD, MBA, FACS, FCCP, CNSC is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Southern Surgical Association, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, Association for Academic Surgery, Association for Surgical Education, Shock Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Tennessee Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


Ali Farouk Mallat, MD, MS, FACS Assistant Professor of Surgery, Acute Care Surgery, University of Michigan Health System

Ali Farouk Mallat, MD, MS, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, International College of Surgeons US Section, National Arab American Medical Association, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Surgical Infection Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jose Fernando Aycinena Goicolea, MD Colorectal Surgeon, Somerset Surgical Services, Somerset Hospital

Jose Fernando Aycinena Goicolea, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Pennsylvania Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Juan J Gallegos, MD Resident Physician in General Surgery, University of Tennessee Memorial Hospital

Juan J Gallegos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Tennessee Medical Association, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Robert L Sheridan, MD Assistant Chief of Staff, Chief of Burn Surgery, Shriners Burns Hospital; Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Burns, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School

Robert L Sheridan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Received research grant from: Shriners Hospitals for Children; Physical Sciences Inc<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: SimQuest Inc -- consultant on burn mapping softwear ($1,500).

Chief Editor

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA Vice Chair and Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Medicine, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Director, Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital; American Gastroenterological Association Fellow

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association, American Physiological Society, American Society of Nephrology, Association for Academic Surgery, International Society of Nephrology, New York Academy of Sciences, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Disclosure: Received royalty from AMGEN for consulting; Received ownership interest from Ardelyx for consulting.


The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous coauthor, Joseph McCadams, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

  1. Blumenthal R, Jandrell IR, West NJ. Does a Sixth Mechanism Exist to Explain Lightning Injuries?: Investigating a Possible New Injury Mechanism to Determine the Cause of Injuries Related to Close Lightning Flashes. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2011 Sep 26. [Medline].

  2. Browne BJ, Gaasch WR. Electrical injuries and lightning. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1992 May. 10(2):211-29. [Medline].

  3. Fontanarosa PB. Electrical shock and lightning strike. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Feb. 22(2 Pt 2):378-87. [Medline].

  4. Martinez JA, Nguyen T. Electrical injuries. South Med J. 2000 Dec. 93(12):1165-8. [Medline].

  5. Dega S, Gnaneswar SG, Rao PR, Ramani P, Krishna DM. Electrical burn injuries. Some unusual clinical situations and management. Burns. 2007 Aug. 33(5):653-65. [Medline].

  6. Fish R. Electric shock, Part II: Nature and mechanisms of injury. J Emerg Med. 1993 Jul-Aug. 11(4):457-62. [Medline].

  7. Cooper MA. Electrical and lightning injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1984 Aug. 2(3):489-501. [Medline].

  8. Leibovici D, Shemer J, Shapira SC. Electrical injuries: current concepts. Injury. 1995 Nov. 26(9):623-7. [Medline].

  9. Fish R. Electric shock, Part I: Physics and pathophysiology. J Emerg Med. 1993 May-Jun. 11(3):309-12. [Medline].

  10. Lee RC, Zhang D, Hannig J. Biophysical injury mechanisms in electrical shock trauma. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000. 2:477-509. [Medline].

  11. Sun CF, Lv XX, Li YJ, Li WZ, Jiang L, Li J, et al. Epidemiological studies of electrical injuries in Shaanxi Province of China: A retrospective report of 383 cases. Burns. 2011 Nov 18. [Medline].

  12. Baker MD, Chiaviello C. Household electrical injuries in children. Epidemiology and identification of avoidable hazards. Am J Dis Child. 1989 Jan. 143(1):59-62. [Medline].

  13. Carleton SC. Cardiac problems associated with electrical injury. Cardiol Clin. 1995 May. 13(2):263-6. [Medline].

  14. ten Duis HJ. Acute electrical burns. Semin Neurol. 1995 Dec. 15(4):381-6. [Medline].

  15. Romero B, Candell-Riera J, Gracia RM, Fernandez MA, Aguadé S, Peracaula R, et al. Myocardial necrosis by electrocution: evaluation of noninvasive methods. J Nucl Med. 1997 Feb. 38(2):250-1. [Medline].

  16. Jost WH, Schönrock LM, Cherington M. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in lightning and electrical injuries. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005. 20(1):19-23. [Medline].

  17. Fish JS, Theman K, Gomez M. Diagnosis of Long-Term Sequelae After Low-Voltage Electrical Injury. J Burn Care Res. 2011 Oct 5. [Medline].

  18. Arnoldo B, Klein M, Gibran NS. Practice guidelines for the management of electrical injuries. J Burn Care Res. 2006 Jul-Aug. 27(4):439-47. [Medline].

  19. Cooper MA. Emergent care of lightning and electrical injuries. Semin Neurol. 1995 Sep. 15(3):268-78. [Medline].

  20. Colic M, Ristic L, Jovanovic M. Emergency treatment and early fluid resuscitation following electrical injuries. Acta Chir Plast. 1996. 38(4):137-41. [Medline].

  21. Cherington M. Neurorehabilitation of the multifaceted and complicated neurologic problems associated with lightning and electrical injuries. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005. 20(1):1-2. [Medline].

  22. Lammertse DP. Neurorehabilitation of spinal cord injuries following lightning and electrical trauma. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005. 20(1):9-14. [Medline].

Arcing electrical burns through the shoe around the rubber sole. High-voltage (7600 V) alternating current nominal. Note cratering.
Contact electrical burn. This was the ground of a 120-V alternating current nominal circuit. Note vesicle with surrounding erythema. Note thermal and contact electrical burns cannot be distinguished easily.
Contact electrical burns, 120-V alternating current nominal. The right knee was the energized side, and the left was ground. These are contact burns and are difficult to distinguish from thermal burns. Note entrance and exit are not viable concepts in alternating current.
Electrical burns to the hand.
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.