eMedicine Specialties > Trauma > Multiorgan Trauma Management

Electrical Injuries: Treatment

Author: Brian James Daley, MD, MBA, FACS, Associate Program Director, Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, University of Tennessee School of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Jose Fernando Aycinena, MD, Staff Physician, Department of General Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Ali Farouk Mallat, MD, Surgical Critical Care Fellow, Department of General Surgery, University of Michigan Health System
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jun 12, 2008

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Patients with electrical injury should be initially evaluated as a trauma patient. Airway, breathing, circulation, and inline immobilization of the spine should be performed as a part of primary survey. Maintain a high index of suspicion and evaluate for hidden injuries. Intravenous access, cardiac monitoring, and measurement of oxygen saturation should be started during the primary survey. Fluid replacement is the most important aspect of the initial resuscitation. As with conventional thermal injury, electrical injuries cause massive fluid shifts with extensive tissue damage and acidosis; therefore, monitoring a patient's hemodynamics is important. A Foley catheter is helpful in monitoring urine output and, therefore, tissue perfusion.

  • Initial fluid resuscitation should aim for urine output of greater than 0.5 cc/kg/h if no signs of myoglobinuria are present and preferably greater than 1 cc/kg/h if myoglobinuria is present. Since lightning burns are usually superficial, using a standard formula, such as the Parkland formula, may be helpful.
  • The extent or volume of tissue damage involved with an electrical injury is difficult to assess. The unpredictable nature of electrical injuries makes estimating fluid deficits much more difficult. Many authors increase fluid replacement after an electrical injury.
  • Based on the Parkland formula, increase fluid replacement by 2-3 times, depending on the total surface area potentially involved. For example, increase it by 3 if the surface area is 20% and increase it by 2 (or less) according to an increased percentage of burned skin. These formulas estimate necessary initial resuscitation volume over the first 24 hours (started at the time of the burn).
  • Use an isotonic balanced saline solution (eg, Ringer's lactate solution) for fluid resuscitation. Closely follow urinary output as an indicator of hemodynamic status and kidney function. Make constant adjustments based on hourly urine output. Decrease or increase fluid rates to maintain urine output of 0.5-1 cc/kg/h.
  • Installing an indwelling urinary catheter is mandatory. Hematuria or dark urine prompts the need for more aggressive therapy to prevent myoglobin-induced tubular necrosis. This is treated with fluids (initiating diuresis) and bicarbonate.
  • Administer bicarbonate at 1-2 mEq/kg. With very extensive injuries, expect acidosis and myoglobinuria, and initiate bicarbonate with the initial fluid bolus.
  • Administer mannitol at 1 gram per kilogram body weight to promote an osmotic diuresis. The target urine output is up to 2-3 mL/kg/h, with a urine pH greater than 6.5. Bicarbonate treats the underlying acidosis and alkalinizes the urine, making myoglobin more soluble.
  • Additional diuretics may be administered. Acetazolamide is the recognized drug of choice because it also alkalinizes the urine. However, exercise this diuresis with extreme caution to avoid hyperosmotic hypoalbuminemia.

Surgical Therapy

  • Functional outcome of an electrical burn wound is inversely proportional to the time lapsed before the start of the reconstructive procedure(s).
  • As part of the nature of the electrical trauma, tissue damage leads to vascular thrombosis and skin and muscle necrosis. This leads to gross limitation on manipulation of local tissues for reconstruction. The optimal management of these wounds has evolved to initial debridement, decompression (fasciotomy), and aggressive planned debridement and early skin coverage with the goal of preserving vital structures.
  • Fasciotomy serves a dual role as both a therapeutic tool and a diagnostic tool in the treatment of electrical injuries. The fact that a burn with a relatively small surface area may hide massive tissue destruction beneath cannot be overemphasized. Therefore, aggressively evaluate any swelling or signs of impaired circulation.
  • Impaired circulation to extremities after thermal skin injury may be the result of constrictive eschar, which usually is circumferential and of full thickness. Impaired circulation also may be the result of compartment syndrome, which is caused by edematous muscles.
  • Volume is limited as a result of the naturally needed fascial compartments. When edema occurs in the same volume compartment, pressures within that compartment rise. Sufficient pressure to occlude venous obstruction easily leads to muscle ischemia, increased edema, and further myonecrosis.
  • Compartment pressures need not exceed arterial pressures to cause necrosis. Any questionable extremity must be examined in the operating room by removing solid eschar initially, followed by fasciotomy as indicated. A low threshold for fasciotomy is indicated because an early fasciotomy may prevent ischemia and prevent (or at least limit) amputation.
  • Fasciotomy also serves a diagnostic role. It can be very important in helping determine the extent of muscular necrosis. Frankly debride the necrotic tissue to explore the affected limbs. Repeat assessment, either during the operation or at dressing changes, can help prevent secondary infection. Assess muscle viability with serial technetium scans. If, at second look, additional necrotic tissue is present, further debride the affected extremity. In severe cases, early amputation remains the only safe choice.
  • Locoregional flaps have served as good alternatives for coverage of electric burn wounds. Alternatives include myocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, and muscle flaps, with a split thickness skin graft serving as an intermediate biological cover or as a definitive procedure.

Preoperative Details

Bring patients to the operating room after aggressive resuscitation has reversed shock, assured oxygen delivery, restored circulating volume, and reestablished end-organ perfusion. The patient may need tetanus prophylaxis. Bedside fasciotomy can be performed if the patient is too unstable to go to the operating room.

Intraoperative Details

Follow the principles of good surgical technique. Perform fasciotomies following prescribed techniques, and ensure that any at-risk compartment is released. Make every effort to protect marginal tissue.

Postoperative Details

Continue aggressive postoperative assessment for myoglobinuria. Local wound care is the surgeon's choice; the authors prefer wet-to-dry gauze dressings changed at twice-daily whirlpool sessions. Consider delayed closure of the fasciotomy site or secondary coverage when appropriate.

Follow-up

Discharge patients with open wounds if adequate wound-care arrangements are available. Follow-up care depends on the nature and extent of the injury. Secondary coverage may be needed, and consulting a plastic or reconstructive surgeon may be helpful.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Environmental Exposures and Injuries Center and Burns Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Lightning Strike and Electric Shock.

Complications

Hopefully, compartment syndrome can be avoided. Other complications include local infection (as with any burn injury), neurologic injury from the initial insult, and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Other associated injuries carry their own list of complications.

Treat wound infections in the standard manner. Early physical and occupational therapy can reduce limb dysfunction (eg, CRPS).

More on Electrical Injuries

Overview: Electrical Injuries
Workup: Electrical Injuries
Treatment: Electrical Injuries
Follow-up: Electrical Injuries
References

References

  1. Arnoldo B, Klein M, Gibran NS. Practice guidelines for the management of electrical injuries. J Burn Care Res. Jul-Aug 2006;27(4):439-47. [Medline].

  2. Baker MD, Chiaviello C. Household electrical injuries in children. Epidemiology and identification of avoidable hazards. Am J Dis Child. Jan 1989;143(1):59-62. [Medline].

  3. Browne BJ, Gaasch WR. Electrical injuries and lightning. Emerg Med Clin North Am. May 1992;10(2):211-29. [Medline].

  4. Carleton SC. Cardiac problems associated with electrical injury. Cardiol Clin. May 1995;13(2):263-6. [Medline].

  5. Cherington M. Neurorehabilitation of the multifaceted and complicated neurologic problems associated with lightning and electrical injuries. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005;20(1):1-2. [Medline].

  6. Colic M, Ristic L, Jovanovic M. Emergency treatment and early fluid resuscitation following electrical injuries. Acta Chir Plast. 1996;38(4):137-41. [Medline].

  7. Cooper MA. Emergent care of lightning and electrical injuries. Semin Neurol. Sep 1995;15(3):268-78. [Medline].

  8. Dega S, Gnaneswar SG, Rao PR, Ramani P, Krishna DM. Electrical burn injuries. Some unusual clinical situations and management. Burns. Aug 2007;33(5):653-65. [Medline].

  9. Fish R. Electric shock, Part I: Physics and pathophysiology. J Emerg Med. May-Jun 1993;11(3):309-12. [Medline].

  10. Fish R. Electric shock, Part II: Nature and mechanisms of injury. J Emerg Med. Jul-Aug 1993;11(4):457-62. [Medline].

  11. Fontanarosa PB. Electrical shock and lightning strike. Ann Emerg Med. Feb 1993;22(2 Pt 2):378-87. [Medline].

  12. Jost WH, Schönrock LM, Cherington M. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in lightning and electrical injuries. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005;20(1):19-23. [Medline].

  13. Lammertse DP. Neurorehabilitation of spinal cord injuries following lightning and electrical trauma. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005;20(1):9-14. [Medline].

  14. Lee RC, Zhang D, Hannig J. Biophysical injury mechanisms in electrical shock trauma. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:477-509. [Medline].

  15. Leibovici D, Shemer J, Shapira SC. Electrical injuries: current concepts. Injury. Nov 1995;26(9):623-7. [Medline].

  16. Martinez JA, Nguyen T. Electrical injuries. South Med J. Dec 2000;93(12):1165-8. [Medline].

  17. Romero B, Candell-Riera J, Gracia RM, Fernandez MA, Aguadé S, Peracaula R, et al. Myocardial necrosis by electrocution: evaluation of noninvasive methods. J Nucl Med. Feb 1997;38(2):250-1. [Medline].

  18. ten Duis HJ. Acute electrical burns. Semin Neurol. Dec 1995;15(4):381-6. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

electrical injury, electric shock, electrocution, electrical shock, electrical burn, electrocution burn, electrical trauma, shock, hit by lightning, lightning trauma, lightning strike, alternating current, AC, direct current, DC, wattage, voltage, Ohm law, Ohm's law, high-voltage injury, high-voltage trauma, burn injury, burn

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Brian James Daley, MD, MBA, FACS, Associate Program Director, Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, University of Tennessee School of Medicine
Brian James Daley, MD, MBA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, Association for Academic Surgery, Association for Surgical Education, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Shock Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Southeastern Surgical Congress, and Tennessee Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Jose Fernando Aycinena, MD, Staff Physician, Department of General Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine
Jose Fernando Aycinena, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons and Tennessee Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ali Farouk Mallat, MD, Surgical Critical Care Fellow, Department of General Surgery, University of Michigan Health System
Ali Farouk Mallat, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, International College of Surgeons US Section, National Arab American Medical Association, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Tennessee Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Alex Jacocks, MD, Program Director, Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Robert L Sheridan, MD, Assistant Chief of Staff, Chief of Burn Surgery, Shriners Burns Hospital; Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Burns, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
Robert L Sheridan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American Burn Association, and American College of Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Timothy D Rice, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine
Timothy D Rice, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA, Vice Chairman, Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Medicine and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Director of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital
John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association, American Physiological Society, American Society of Nephrology, Association for Academic Surgery, International Society of Nephrology, New York Academy of Sciences, and Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Disclosure: AMGEN Royalty Other; AstraZeneca Grant/research funds Other

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.