Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.


Cystinuria Treatment & Management

  • Author: Chandra Shekhar Biyani, MS, MBBS, DUrol, FRCS(Urol), FEBU; Chief Editor: Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS  more...
Updated: Apr 16, 2015

Medical Care

The foundation of cystine stone prevention is adequate hydration and urinary alkalinization. When this conservative therapy fails, the addition of thiol drugs, such as D-penicillamine, alpha-MPG, and captopril, are added to the regimen. Disappointingly few advances in the medical treatment of cystinuria have occurred over the last 10-15 years. No therapy currently addresses the underlying derangement of dibasic amino acid transport.[12, 31, 32]

Management algorithm

Overall, for a patient with cystinuria who does not have a stone, first-line therapy in most cases is a conservative approach, including large-volume fluid intake (urine output >2.5 L/d), regular urine pH monitoring (urine pH level of 7.5 and < 8), dietary restrictions, and urinary alkalization with potassium citrate.

If this standard therapy fails to achieve the urinary cystine concentration of 300 mg/L, then medical therapy with D-penicillamine, alpha-MPG, or captopril must be added.

Treat patients with stone disease according to the location of the stone. The expertise of a urologist and a radiologist is important for decision-making processes, and stone site and size also influence further management. See treatment algorithm in image below.

Treatment algorithm for cystinuria. Treatment algorithm for cystinuria.


The average homozygous patient with cystinuria excretes 600-1400 mg of cystine per day. The solubility of cystine at a pH level of 7 is 250-300 mg/L. Therefore, one of the oldest and most effective cystine stone–prevention techniques is hyperdiuresis to decrease urinary cystine concentration. Early studies by Dent et al in the 1960s showed that hydration alone could prevent stone recurrence in up to a third of patients. This finding has been corroborated by more recent studies.

The goals of hydration therapy are urine volumes in excess of 3 L/d. This goal may require ingesting 4-4.5 L of water per day. Patients should drink 240 mL of water every hour during the day and 480 mL before retiring and at least once during the night. Patients should monitor the specific gravity of their urine using Nitrazine dipsticks, with a goal of achieving a value less than 1.010.


Alkaline urine can prevent the precipitation of cystine calculi and can even aid in dissolution. Urine pH level must be more than 7.5 for stone dissolution to occur. Alkalizing beverages, such as mineral water, rich in bicarbonate and low in sodium (1500 mg HCO3/L, maximum 500 mg sodium/L), and citrus juices are preferred.

Paradoxically, a urine pH level of more than 7.5 can cause a predisposition to the formation of calcium phosphate calculi, so urine must be monitored with dipsticks to maintain a pH level of 7-7.5 for stone prevention.

With any alkalinization therapy, monitoring of urinary pH is essential. Currently, however, Nitrazine paper and standard pH dipsticks have no clear color differentiations in the pH level range of 6-7.5. UriDynamics, a small company in Indianapolis, Ind, has developed a new test strip called StoneGuard II. This strip includes an additional color block at a pH level of 7.5. The colors produced are yellow-orange (pH level of 5), yellow-green (pH level of 6), green-yellow (pH level of 6.5), light green (pH level of 7), green with blue cast (pH level of 7.5), and greenish blue (pH level of 8). No interference from common medications, nutritional supplements, or blood has been observed. It also has a pad to measure specific gravity over a range of 1.000-1.030.

Sodium bicarbonate was used in the past but is no longer recommended as a first-line agent. The sodium ion may actually increase the amount of cystine excreted.

Potassium citrate is the first-line alkalinizing drug. The typical adult dose is 60-80 mEq/d divided into 3-4 doses (15-20 mL/d), titrating the dose as needed to maintain a urine pH level within the target range of 7-7.5.

Acetazolamide inhibits the brush-border carbonic anhydrase of the proximal convoluted tubule, thereby increasing urinary bicarbonate excretion. Acetazolamide is not widely used as a first-line drug and is of questionable efficacy.

Chelating agents

Cystine-binding and cystine-reducing agents share the ability to dissociate the cystine molecule into disulfide moieties with much higher solubilities than the parent molecule. These drugs are thiol derivatives. The treatment goal is excretion of less than 200 mg/d of urinary cystine, and this must be monitored yearly.

Start these agents when hydration, dietary, and alkalinization therapies fail.

Cystine-binding agents can dissolve cystine calculi, but this feat usually takes many months to years. They are best suited for stone prevention after surgical debulking of the stone burden, and they possibly help soften cystine stones in preparation for ESWL.


Penicillamine is a first-generation chelating agent that combines with cystine to form a soluble disulfide complex (50 times more soluble than cystine), thus preventing stone formation and possibly even dissolving existing cystine stones. Three types of isomers of penicillamine are known and include D, L, and DL. Only the D form should be used clinically.

The effect of the drug is dose-dependent. A 250-mg/d increase in dose decreases the urinary cystine level by 75-100 mg/d. Doses of 1-2 g/d are effective in reducing the urinary cystine level to 200 mg/g of creatinine.

The prevalence rate of adverse reactions is approximately 50%; therefore, routine use is limited. Adverse effects include rash, arthralgia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal intolerance, and nephritic syndrome.

Long-term therapy may lead to vitamin B-6 (pyridoxine) deficiency; thus, vitamin B-6 supplementation (50 mg/d) is needed.


Alpha-mercaptopropionylglycine (alpha-MPG) is a second-generation chelating agent mercaptan agent with a chemical structure and mechanism of action (based on a thiol disulfide exchange reaction) similar to that of D-penicillamine, but a 30% higher dissolution capacity for cystine than penicillamine. Alpha-MPG was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1988.

The drug is not excreted in the urine, so the cyanide-nitroprusside test is an effective qualitative screening method for monitoring the control of cystinuria. A positive test result indicates the need for an increased dosage.

The main advantage of this agent is its lower toxicity profile. In a multicenter trial by Pak et al in 1986, 69% of subjects discontinued D-penicillamine because of adverse reactions, compared with 31% for alpha-MPG.[14]


In 1987, Sloand and Izzo reported the effectiveness of captopril in the treatment of patients with cystinuria.[33]

Captopril is a thiol first-generation ACE inhibitor and has been shown to form a thiol-cysteine mixed disulfide. This complex is 200 times more soluble than cystine. Newer thiol compounds, such as thiophosphate and meso-2-3-dimercaptosuccinic acid, have been used both in vitro and in a few clinical trials.

Captopril at doses of 75-100 mg was used in 2 patients, and cystine excretion decreased 70% and 93%. However, as reported by Sloand and Izzo, various follow-up studies have reported conflicting results.[33]

Captopril can be used to treat patients whose conditions fail to respond to standard treatment and to treat patients with cystinuria who are hypertensive.


Bucillamine (Rimatil), a dithiol compound, was reported by Koide et al in 1992 and is a third-

generation chelating agent available only in Japan and South Korea.[34]

Incubation of L-cystine with a specific amount of bucillamine and tiopronin (Thiola) in vitro studies showed a substantially lower amount of L-cystine in the presence of bucillamine compared with tiopronin.

Use of bucillamine in persons with rheumatoid arthritis showed a low toxicity profile; therefore, it is probably well tolerated by patients with cystinuria.

L-cystine dimethyl esters (L-CDME) and L-cystine methyl esters (L-CME)

These agents are effective inhibitors of cystine crystal growth. Preliminary in vivo studies have demonstrated promising results.{{Ref35 An L-CDME concentration near 2 mg/L was associated with therapeutic effects. Because of effectiveness at lower concentrations, these agents may have fewer adverse effects and better tolerance than others.[36]


Surgical Care

Indications for surgery are large calculi that are unlikely to dissolve and obstructing or otherwise symptomatic calculi. Smaller stones can be monitored as part of an aggressive medical treatment plan with the hope of dissolution and/or spontaneous passage. The ultimate goal of surgery is to make the patient free of stones. While the risk of recurrence is unchanged, the time to recurrence is significantly lengthened.

Surgical options can be broadly classified into the following six modalities:

  • Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL)
  • Retrograde endoscopic lithotripsy and extraction
  • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Multimodal therapy
  • Percutaneous nephrostomy for chemical dissolution
  • Open surgery (urethra, bladder, ureter, kidneys)

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy

ESWL is especially effective for cystine stones smaller than 1.5 cm in diameter, although overall stone-free rates are lower than those for stones of other composition.

Because of their hardness and homogenous amino acid composition, most cystine stones require two to three times the usual number of shocks to adequately fragment the stone. Multiple treatments are often necessary to achieve acceptable stone-free rates.

When considering candidates for ESWL, some authors suggest an upper limit of 1.5 cm for upper ureteral or renal cystine calculi. As reported by Kachel et al in 1991, these authors prefer to limit ESWL to renal calculi smaller than 1 cm in diameter.[37]

ESWL is appropriate in the treatment of ureteral cystine calculi. Stones not visualized after fluoroscopy can still be opacified by either retrograde or intravenous contrast administration to allow for lithotripsy.

Patients taking thiol derivatives may have cystine calculi that are more fragile because the cystine is replaced by apatite in approximately 30% of cases. These calculi may be easier to treat with ESWL.

Retrograde endoscopic lithotripsy and extraction

Historically, retrograde endoscopic treatment of cystine calculi was associated with complications and a low success rate compared with stones of other composition of equal size and location in the urinary tract. This was largely due to technical limitations in scope design and the failure of electrohydraulic lithotripsy to adequately fragment stones.

Currently, a retrograde approach is suitable for mid-to-distal ureteral cystine calculi when using high-energy modalities such as holmium:YAG laser or pneumatic shock devices (eg, Lithoclast). Smaller proximal ureteral calculi may also be treated in a retrograde fashion.

The role of retrograde treatment of renal calculi and large proximal stones is less clear, although ESWL and percutaneous surgery are generally preferred for larger stones. However, one study reports 5 of 6 patients with renal calculi 1.5-3 cm in diameter who were successfully treated via a retrograde approach with intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the criterion standard for cystine renal calculi larger than 1-1.5 cm in diameter and for calculi for which ESWL or retrograde surgery has failed.

Ultrasonic lithotripsy readily fragments most cystine stones, although re-treatment rates are still approximately 50% compared with approximately 15% for other calculi. Stone-free rates after multiple treatments range from 40%-86%, although recurrence rates are high, approaching 50%-70% at 5-year follow-up despite postoperative medical management.

Multimodal therapy

For large cystine stone burdens, such as occurs with full staghorn calculi, multimodal therapy may help achieve better stone-free rates.

So-called sandwich therapy involves initial percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy followed by ESWL and then repeat ultrasonic lithotripsy or flexible nephroscopy and laser lithotripsy.

Percutaneous nephrostomy for chemical dissolution

Direct irrigation of renal calculi with chemodissolution agents through a percutaneous nephrostomy tube was successful in treating a limited number of patients in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

The two most commonly used agents were acetylcysteine (Mucomyst) and tromethamine-E (THAM-E). Acetylcysteine creates soluble disulfide complexes with cystine, similar to the action of D-penicillamine. In addition, percutaneous administration of alkalinizing agents can create a pronounced alkaline milieu. A solution containing 60 mL of a 20% solution of N -acetylcysteine and 300 mEq of sodium bicarbonate per liter of saline is recommended. Tromethamine-E is an organic amine buffer with a pH level of 10.2.

Treatment times range from weeks to months. Given the extended treatment times, relatively low success rates, and success of ESWL and percutaneous nephrolithotomy, this modality is rarely used today. Some urologists may still use chemodissolution to help achieve stone-free status in patients with fragments remaining after percutaneous nephrolithotomy or ESWL or for patients unable to tolerate surgery.

Open surgery

Given the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ESWL, and endoscopic retrograde approaches, open surgery is not indicated as first-line therapy for cystine calculi anywhere in the kidneys or ureter, with rare exceptions. Large bladder calculi may be amenable to open surgery, but these stones can also be treated with laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

Ureteral substitution with small intestine has been reported in highly select cases.



Treatment of the patient with cystinuria requires close cooperation between the urologist and the nephrologist. Maintaining high diuresis of at least 3 L/d, regularly distributed throughout the night and day, even when sulfhydryl compounds are given, appears to be the major factor predictive of therapeutic success. Regular clinical, radiological, and biochemical surveillance appears to be of primary importance to maintain good long-term compliance with medical treatment.



Cystine is formed during the metabolism of methionine; therefore, a diet low in methionine is effective. To be effective, dietary methionine must be reduced to 1 g/d. Unfortunately, a primarily vegetarian diet is generally not accepted by patients. Thus, a well-balanced mixed diet with relatively low-protein content (0.8 g protein/kg body weight/d) is recommended.

Cystine excretion increases with high-sodium intake. Processed foods contain large amounts of sodium chloride and are best avoided. Other dietary considerations include the following:

  • Methionine: Instruct patients to avoid foods with very high methionine content, including stockfish and eggs, and to reduce their consumption of meat, fish, poultry, and cheese. One study reported decreased cystine production (by approximately 500 µmol/d) with reduced methionine intake.
  • Low-sodium diet: Reducing sodium intake from 300 mmol/d to 50 mmol/d can decrease cystine excretion by 650 µmol/d (156 mg/d).
  • Glutamine: A series from 1979 reported by Miyagi et al indicated reduced cystine excretion with oral or intravenous glutamine. However, this effect has not been duplicated in other studies. [38]

Dietary guidelines for patients are as follows:

  • Eat only small amounts of protein-rich foods such as meat, fish, sausages, eggs, cheese, and soybeans
  • Consume foods with a low-protein content, such as fruits, vegetables, salads, and cereals
  • Limit additional salt during meals; limit canned foods, smoked foods, and pickled foods
  • Increase dietary fiber intake
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Chandra Shekhar Biyani, MS, MBBS, DUrol, FRCS(Urol), FEBU Consulting Urologist, Department of Urology, Pinderfields General Hospital, The Mid-Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK

Chandra Shekhar Biyani, MS, MBBS, DUrol, FRCS(Urol), FEBU is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, International College of Surgeons, British Association of Urological Surgeons, European Association of Urology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


Jon Cartledge, MB, BCh, MD, FRCS Consulting Urologist, Pyrah Department of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK

Jon Cartledge, MB, BCh, MD, FRCS is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Eleanor Lederer, MD, FASN Professor of Medicine, Chief, Nephrology Division, Director, Nephrology Training Program, Director, Metabolic Stone Clinic, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Louisville Veterans Affairs Hospital

Eleanor Lederer, MD, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, International Society of Nephrology, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, American Federation for Medical Research, American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, American Society of Nephrology, American Society of Transplantation, Kentucky Medical Association, National Kidney Foundation, Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Received grant/research funds from Dept of Veterans Affairs for research; Received salary from American Society of Nephrology for asn council position; Received salary from University of Louisville for employment; Received salary from University of Louisville Physicians for employment; Received contract payment from American Physician Institute for Advanced Professional Studies, LLC for independent contractor; Received contract payment from Healthcare Quality Strategies, Inc for independent cont.

Chief Editor

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS Professor of Urology, Director, Center for Laparoscopy and Endourology, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, Association of Military Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons, American Urological Association, Endourological Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS Professor of Urology, Director, Center for Laparoscopy and Endourology, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, Association of Military Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons, American Urological Association, Endourological Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

  1. Wollaston WH. On cystic oxide. A new species of urinary calculus. Trans R Soc London. 1810. 100:223-30.

  2. Berzellius J. Calculus urinaires. Traite Chem. 1833. 7:424.

  3. Garrod AE. Inborn errors of metabolism. Lancet. 1908. 2:1, 73, 142, 214.

  4. Yeh HL, Frankl W, Dunn MS. The urinary excretion of amino acids by cystinuric subjects. Am J Med Sci. 1974. 214:507-12.

  5. Dent CC, Rose GA. Amino acid metabolism in cystinuria. Q J Med New Series. 1974. 214:507-12.

  6. Harris H, Mittwoch U, Robson EB, Warren FL. Phenotypes and genotypes in cystinuria. Ann Hum Genet. 1955 Aug. 20(1):57-91. [Medline].

  7. Milne MD, Asatoor AM, Edwards KD, Loughridge LW. The intestinal absorption defect in cystinuria. Gut. 1961 Dec. 2(4):323-37. [Medline].

  8. Tabachnick M, Eisen HN, Levine B. A new mixed disulphide: penicillamine-cysteine. Nature. 1954 Oct 9. 174(4432):701-2. [Medline].

  9. Crawhall JC, Scowen EF, Watts RW. Effect of penicillamine on cystinuria. Br Med J. 1963 Mar 2. 5330:588-90. [Medline].

  10. Lee WS, Wells RG, Sabbag RV, et al. Cloning and chromosomal localization of a human kidney cDNA involved in cystine, dibasic, and neutral amino acid transport. J Clin Invest. 1993 May. 91(5):1959-63. [Medline].

  11. Bisceglia L, Calonge MJ, Totaro A, et al. Localization, by linkage analysis, of the cystinuria type III gene to chromosome 19q13.1. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Mar. 60(3):611-6. [Medline].

  12. Chillarón J, Font-Llitjós M, Fort J, Zorzano A, Goldfarb DS, Nunes V, et al. Pathophysiology and treatment of cystinuria. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010 Jul. 6(7):424-34. [Medline].

  13. Dent CE, Senior B. Studies on the treatment of cystinuria. Br J Urol. 1955 Dec. 27(4):317-32. [Medline].

  14. Pak CY, Fuller C, Sakhaee K, et al. Management of cystine nephrolithiasis with alpha- mercaptopropionylglycine. J Urol. 1986 Nov. 136(5):1003-8. [Medline].

  15. Pak CY, Fuller CJ. Assessment of cystine solubility in urine and of heterogeneous nucleation. J Urol. 1983 May. 129(5):1066-70. [Medline].

  16. Martins MC, Meyers AA, Whalley NA, Rodgers AL. Cystine: a promoter of the growth and aggregation of calcium oxalate crystals in normal undiluted human urine. J Urol. 2002 Jan. 167(1):317-21. [Medline].

  17. Gasparini P, Calonge MJ, Bisceglia L, et al. Molecular genetics of cystinuria: identification of four new mutations and seven polymorphisms, and evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Oct. 57(4):781-8. [Medline].

  18. Pras E. Cystinuria at the turn of the millennium: clinical aspects and new molecular developments. Mol Urol. 2000 Winter. 4(4):409-14. [Medline].

  19. Dello Strologo L, Pras E, Pontesilli C, et al. Comparison between SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 cystinuria patients and carriers: a need for a new classification. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Oct. 13(10):2547-53. [Medline].

  20. Martens K, Jaeken J, Matthijs G, Creemers JW. Multi-system disorder syndromes associated with cystinuria type I. Curr Mol Med. 2008 Sep. 8(6):544-50. [Medline].

  21. Rosenberg LE, Downing S, Durant JL, Segal S. Cystinuria: biochemical evidence for three genetically distinct diseases. J Clin Invest. 1966 Mar. 45(3):365-71. [Medline].

  22. Barbey F, Joly D, Rieu P, et al. Medical treatment of cystinuria: critical reappraisal of long-term results. J Urol. 2000 May. 163(5):1419-23. [Medline].

  23. Lindell A, Denneberg T, Granerus G. Studies on renal function in patients with cystinuria. Nephron. 1997. 77(1):76-85. [Medline].

  24. Chow GK, Streem SB. Contemporary urological intervention for cystinuric patients: immediate and long-term impact and implications. J Urol. 1998 Aug. 160(2):341-4; discussion 344-5. [Medline].

  25. Sakhaee K, Poindexter JR, Pak CY. The spectrum of metabolic abnormalities in patients with cystine nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 1989 Apr. 141(4):819-21. [Medline].

  26. Daudon M, Cohen-Solal F, Barbey F, et al. Cystine crystal volume determination: a useful tool in the management of cystinuric patients. Urol Res. 2003 Jul. 31(3):207-11. [Medline].

  27. Coe FL, Clark C, Parks JH, Asplin JR. Solid phase assay of urine cystine supersaturation in the presence of cystine binding drugs. J Urol. 2001 Aug. 166(2):688-93. [Medline].

  28. Dolin DJ, Asplin JR, Flagel L, et al. Effect of cystine-binding thiol drugs on urinary cystine capacity in patients with cystinuria. J Endourol. 2005 Apr. 19(3):429-32. [Medline].

  29. van Hoeve K, Vermeersch P, Regal L, Levtchenko E. Necessity of fractionated urine collection for monitoring patients with cystinuria. Clin Chem. 2011 May. 57(5):780-1. [Medline].

  30. Pontoni G, Rotondo F, Spagnuolo G, et al. Diagnosis and follow-up of cystinuria: use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Amino Acids. 2000. 19(2):469-76. [Medline].

  31. Tiselius HG. New horizons in the management of patients with cystinuria. Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Mar. 20(2):169-73. [Medline].

  32. Goldfarb DS. Potential pharmacologic treatments for cystinuria and for calcium stones associated with hyperuricosuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Aug. 6(8):2093-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  33. Sloand JA, Izzo JL Jr. Captopril reduces urinary cystine excretion in cystinuria. Arch Intern Med. 1987 Aug. 147(8):1409-12. [Medline].

  34. Koide T, Yamaguchi S, Utsonomiya M. A new therapeutic agent for cystinuria. VII International Symposium on Urolithiasis. Cairns, Australia. New York, NY: Plenum; 1992. 168.

  35. Rimer JD, An Z, Zhu Z, et al. Crystal growth inhibitors for the prevention of L-cystine kidney stones through molecular design. Science. 2010 Oct 15. 330(6002):337-41. [Medline].

  36. Goldfarb DS. Potential pharmacologic treatments for cystinuria and for calcium stones associated with hyperuricosuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Aug. 6(8):2093-7. [Medline].

  37. Kachel TA, Vijan SR, Dretler SP. Endourological experience with cystine calculi and a treatment algorithm. J Urol. 1991 Jan. 145(1):25-8. [Medline].

  38. Miyagi K, Nakada F, Ohshiro S. Effect of glutamine on cystine excretion in a patient with cystinuria. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jul 26. 301(4):196-8. [Medline].

  39. Akakura K, Egoshi K, Ueda T, et al. The long-term outcome of cystinuria in Japan. Urol Int. 1998. 61(2):86-9. [Medline].

  40. Assimos DG, Leslie SW, Ng C, et al. The impact of cystinuria on renal function. J Urol. 2002 Jul. 168(1):27-30. [Medline].

  41. Bertran J, Werner A, Chillaron J, et al. Expression cloning of a human renal cDNA that induces high affinity transport of L-cystine shared with dibasic amino acids in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jul 15. 268(20):14842-9. [Medline].

  42. Bhatta KM, Prien EL Jr, Dretler SP. Cystine calculi--rough and smooth: a new clinical distinction. J Urol. 1989 Oct. 142(4):937-40. [Medline].

  43. Borsani G, Bassi MT, Sperandeo MP, et al. SLC7A7, encoding a putative permease-related protein, is mutated in patients with lysinuric protein intolerance. Nat Genet. 1999 Mar. 21(3):297-301. [Medline].

  44. Botzenhart E, Vester U, Schmidt C, et al. Cystinuria in children: distribution and frequencies of mutations in the SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 genes. Kidney Int. 2002 Oct. 62(4):1136-42. [Medline].

  45. Calonge MJ, Nadal M, Calvano S, et al. Assignment of the gene responsible for cystinuria (rBAT) and of markers D2S119 and D2S177 to 2p16 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet. 1995 Jun. 95(6):633-6. [Medline].

  46. Chow GK, Streem SB. Medical treatment of cystinuria: results of contemporary clinical practice. J Urol. 1996 Nov. 156(5):1576-8. [Medline].

  47. Cohen TD, Streem SB, Hall P. Clinical effect of captopril on the formation and growth of cystine calculi. J Urol. 1995 Jul. 154(1):164-6. [Medline].

  48. Dretler SP, Pfister RC, Newhouse JH, Prien EL Jr. Percutaneous catheter dissolution of cystine calculi. J Urol. 1984 Feb. 131(2):216-9. [Medline].

  49. Feliubadalo L, Font M, Purroy J, et al. Non-type I cystinuria caused by mutations in SLC7A9, encoding a subunit (bo,+AT) of rBAT. International Cystinuria Consortium. Nat Genet. 1999 Sep. 23(1):52-7. [Medline].

  50. Fjellstedt E, Denneberg T, Jeppsson JO, Tiselius HG. A comparison of the effects of potassium citrate and sodium bicarbonate in the alkalinization of urine in homozygous cystinuria. Urol Res. 2001 Oct. 29(5):295-302. [Medline].

  51. Gambaro G, Favaro S, D'Angelo A. Risk for renal failure in nephrolithiasis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Feb. 37(2):233-43. [Medline].

  52. Goodyer P, Boutros M, Rozen R. The molecular basis of cystinuria: an update. Exp Nephrol. 2000 May-Jun. 8(3):123-7. [Medline].

  53. Goodyer P, Saadi I, Ong P, et al. Cystinuria subtype and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 1998 Jul. 54(1):56-61. [Medline].

  54. Heimbach D, Jacobs D, Müller SC, Hesse A. Improving cystine stone therapy: an in vitro study of dissolution. Urology. 2000 Jan. 55(1):17-21. [Medline].

  55. Ito H, Egoshi K, Mizoguchi K, Akakura K. Advances in genetic aspects of cystinuria. Mol Urol. 2000. 4(4):403-8. [Medline].

  56. Jaeger P, Portmann L, Saunders A, et al. Anticystinuric effects of glutamine and of dietary sodium restriction. N Engl J Med. 1986 Oct 30. 315(18):1120-3. [Medline].

  57. Kashiwazaki S, Shiokawa Y. Bucillamine: a new immunomodulator. Int M J Immunother. 1987. 3:1-6.

  58. Knoll LD, Segura JW, Patterson DE, et al. Long-term followup in patients with cystine urinary calculi treated by percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy. J Urol. 1988 Aug. 140(2):246-8. [Medline].

  59. Martensson J, Denneberg T, Lindell A, Textorius O. Sulfur amino acid metabolism in cystinuria: a biochemical and clinical study of patients. Kidney Int. 1990 Jan. 37(1):143-9. [Medline].

  60. Mattoo A, Goldfarb DS. Cystinuria. Semin Nephrol. 2008 Mar. 28(2):181-91. [Medline].

  61. McDonald MW, Stoller ML. Cystinuria: advances in medical therapy. Contemp Urol. 1996 Apr. 8:20-36.

  62. Milliner DS. Cystinuria. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1990 Dec. 19(4):889-907. [Medline].

  63. Pareek G, Steele TH, Nakada SY. Urological intervention in patients with cystinuria is decreased with medical compliance. J Urol. 2005 Dec. 174(6):2250-2, discussion 2252. [Medline].

  64. Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Weizer AZ, et al. Durability of the medical management of cystinuria. J Urol. 2003 Jan. 169(1):68-70. [Medline].

  65. Rudnick DM, Bennett PM, Dretler SP. Retrograde renoscopic fragmentation of moderate-size (1.5-3.0-cm) renal cystine stones. J Endourol. 1999 Sep. 13(7):483-5. [Medline].

  66. Rutchik SD, Resnick MI. Cystine calculi. Diagnosis and management. Urol Clin North Am. 1997 Feb. 24(1):163-71. [Medline].

  67. Sakhaee K, Sutton RA. Pathogenesis and medical management of cystinuria. Coe FL, Favus MJ, Pak C, eds. Kidney stones: Medical and Surgical Managements. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. 1007-17.

  68. Saltzman N, Gittes RF. Chemolysis of cystine calculi. J Urol. 1986 Oct. 136(4):846-9. [Medline].

  69. Schmidt J, Madersbacher S, Hochreiter WW, et al. Simultaneous replacement of both ureters with small intestine in a woman with cystinuria. J Urol. 2001 Dec. 166(6):2315-6. [Medline].

  70. Segal S, Thier SO. Cystinuria. Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle S, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1995. 3581-601.

  71. Streem SB, Hall P. Effect of captopril on urinary cystine excretion in homozygous cystinuria. J Urol. 1989 Dec. 142(6):1522-4. [Medline].

  72. Zhang XX, Rozen R, Hediger MA, et al. Assignment of the gene for cystinuria (SLC3A1) to human chromosome 2p21 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics. 1994 Nov 15. 24(2):413-4. [Medline].

Cystine solubility in urine.
Electron microscopic picture showing cystine crystals.
Plain radiograph of the abdomen showing cystine staghorn stones.
Faintly opaque (ground-glass appearance) left lower ureteric stone.
Intravenous urogram showing left ureterohydronephrosis.
Renal sonogram demonstrating renal calculi in the lower pole.
Treatment algorithm for cystinuria.
Table. Classification of Cystinuria
Rosenberg et al [21] Type I Type II Type III
Molecular Type I Non–Type I
Responsible gene SLC3A1 SLC7A9
Band 2p21 19q13.1
No. of mutations >60 39
Most common mutation M467 V170M
Population affected Mediterranean Spanish persons, 40% Libyan Jews
Deletion rate 54% 25%
Protein rBAT BAT1
Amino acid transport system
Localization in proximal converted tubule S3 S1, S2
Transporter characteristic High affinity, low capacity Low affinity, high capacity
Clinical features
Homozygotes Symptomatic approximately 90% symptomatic
Heterozygotes Asymptomatic approximately 10%-13% symptomatic
Urinary cystine levels Normal Elevated +++++ Elevated +
Plasma cystine levels after an oral load test Same Same or slight rise Increased
Intestinal transport Absent (no transport of cystine, lysine, or arginine) Absent Reduced
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.