Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Workup

  • Author: Levi A Deters, MD; Chief Editor: Edward David Kim, MD, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Oct 7, 2011
 

Approach Considerations

In 2011, the American Urological Association (AUA) published a 2010 update to their Guideline on the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. The update included an algorithm for the diagnosis and basic treatment of LUTS, which is presented below.[2]

Basic management of lower urinary tract symptoms (Basic management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men

A prospective, multicenter study in 3 European countries called the Diagnosis Improvement in PrimAry Care Trial (D-IMPACT) found that in three quarters of the men aged 50 years and older who spontaneously reported LUTS to their general practitioner, those who were given an in-office diagnostic algorithm that included just the objective variables of age, PSS, and PSA were accurately diagnosed for BPH by their general practitioner.[3]

Next

Urinalysis

Examine the urine using dipstick methods and/or via centrifuged sediment evaluation to assess for the presence of blood, leukocytes, bacteria, protein, or glucose.

Previous
Next

Urine Culture

This may be useful to exclude infectious causes of irritative voiding and is usually performed if the initial urinalysis findings indicate an abnormality.

Previous
Next

Prostate-Specific Antigen

Although BPH does not cause prostate cancer, men at risk for BPH are also at risk for prostate cancer and should be screened accordingly.

The 2010 update of the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline for early detection of prostate cancer stresses the importance of involving men in the decision whether to test for prostate cancer. The ACS notes that PSA testing may reduce the likelihood of dying from prostate cancer but poses serious risks, particularly of treatment of prostate cancer that would not have caused ill effects if left undetected.[4]

The ACS recommends that men receive information about the uncertainties, risks, and potential benefits associated with prostate cancer screening (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] testing and digital rectal examination [DRE] for prostate cancer) at the following ages:

  • Starting at age 50 years in men who are expected to live at least 10 more years
  • Starting at age 45 years in men at high risk for prostate cancer (African-Americans and men with a close relative with prostate cancer)
  • Starting at age 40 years in men with multiple close relatives with prostate cancer

A physician should discuss the risks and benefits of PSA screening with the patient. Notably, men with larger prostates may have slightly higher PSA levels.

Previous
Next

Electrolytes, BUN, and Creatinine

These evaluations are useful screening tools for chronic renal insufficiency in patients who have high postvoid residual (PVR) urine volumes. A routine serum creatinine measurement is not indicated in the initial evaluation of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH.[2]

Previous
Next

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography (abdominal, renal, transrectal) and intravenous urography are useful for helping determine bladder and prostate size and the degree of hydronephrosis (if any) in patients with urinary retention or signs of renal insufficiency. Generally, they are not indicated for the initial evaluation of uncomplicated LUTS.

Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) of the prostate is recommended in selected patients, to determine the dimensions and volume of the prostate gland. The success of certain minimally invasive treatments may depend on the anatomical characteristics of the gland. In patients with elevated PSA levels, TRUS-guided biopsy may be indicated.

Imaging of the upper tracts is indicated in patients who present with concomitant hematuria, a history of urolithiasis, an elevated creatinine level, high PVR volume, or history of upper urinary tract infection.

Other imaging studies, such as CT scanning and MRI, have no role in the evaluation and treatment of uncomplicated BPH.

Previous
Next

American Urological Association Guidelines

The American Urological Association (AUA) has developed rigorous clinical practice guidelines for BPH based on the 1994 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines for BPH. In 2006, the AUA Practice Guidelines Committee updated the 1994 evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of BPH originally created under the auspices of the United States Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.[5, 6]

The AUA 2010 BPH guideline update lowered the age of the Index Patient from age 50 years or older to age 45 years or older. Two algorithms were published: the algorithm for diagnosis and basic management of LUTS in the Approach section above, and an algorithm for detailed management of bothersome LUTS that persists after basic management, shown below.[2]

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) diagnosis and tBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) diagnosis and treatment algorithm.

These panels have established the following categories to classify diagnostic tests and studies. A recommended test is one that should be performed on every patient, whereas an optional test is of proven value in selected patients.

Recommended tests

A medical history should be taken to qualify and quantify voiding dysfunction. Identification of other causes of voiding dysfunction and medical comorbidities are essential to properly assess the condition and to determine conditions that may complicate treatment.

The physical examination consists of a focused physical examination and a neurologic examination. The physical examination includes a DRE to measure prostate size and to assess for abnormalities. The neurological examination is geared toward lower-extremity neurologic and muscular function, as well as anal sphincter tone. Examination of the phallus and foreskin occasionally reveals meatal stenosis, unretractable foreskin, penile ulcers, or foreign bodies such as warts.

PSA testing should be offered to any patient with a 10-year life expectancy in whom the diagnosis of prostate cancer would change management.

The severity of BPH can be determined with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)/American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) plus a disease-specific quality of life (QOL) question. The AUA-SI for BPH is a set of 7 questions that has been adopted worldwide and yields reproducible and quantifiable information regarding symptoms and response to treatment. Questions concern incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia.

The IPSS uses the same 7 questions as the AUA-SI, with the addition of an eighth question, known as the bother score, which is designed to assess perceived disease-specific QOL. The AUA-SI/IPSS questionnaire is available online. Based on the sum of the score for all 8 questions, patients are classified as 0-7 (mildly symptomatic), 8-19 (moderately symptomatic), or 20-35 (severely symptomatic).

Optional tests

Flow rate is useful in the initial assessment and to help determine the response to treatment. It may be performed prior to embarking on any active treatments, including medical treatment.

A maximal flow rate (Qmax) is the single best measurement, but a low Qmax does not help differentiate between obstruction and poor bladder contractility. For more detailed analysis, a pressure flow study (urodynamic testing) is required. A Qmax value of greater than 15 mL/s is considered by many to be normal. A value of less than 7 mL/s is widely accepted as low.

The results of flow rate measurements are somewhat effort- and volume-dependent. Therefore, the best plan to make a reasonable determination of significance is to obtain at least 2 tracings with at least 150 mL of voided volume each time.

Obtain postvoid residual urine in order to gauge the severity of bladder decompensation. It can be obtained invasively with a catheter or noninvasively with a transabdominal ultrasonic scanner. A high PVR (ie, 350 mL) may indicate bladder dysfunction and/or bladder outlet obstruction and may predict a poor response to treatment.

Although pressure flow studies are somewhat invasive, requiring catheterization of the urethra and placement of a transrectal pressure transducer, the findings may prove useful for evaluating for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).

Urodynamic studies are the only way to help distinguish poor bladder contraction ability (detrusor underactivity) from outlet obstruction. BOO is characterized by high intravesical voiding pressures (>60 cm water) accompanied by low urine flow rates (Qmax < 15 mL/s).

Cytologic examination of the urine may be considered in patients with predominantly irritative voiding symptoms. Risk factors for bladder cancer (smoking, previous bladder cancer) should alert the physician to consider this noninvasive test.

Tests that are not recommended

Routine measurement of serum creatinine is not indicated in the initial evaluation of men with LUTS secondary to BPH.

Previous
Next

Endoscopy of the Lower Urinary Tract

Cystoscopy may be indicated in patients scheduled for invasive treatment or in whom a foreign body or malignancy is suspected. In addition, endoscopy may be indicated in patients with a history of sexually transmitted disease (eg, gonococcal urethritis), prolonged catheterization, or trauma. Findings may suggest urethral stricture as the cause of BOO, instead of BPH.

Flexible cystoscopy can be easily performed in several minutes in an office-based setting using topical gel-based intraurethral anesthesia without sedation.

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

BPH is characterized by a varying combination of epithelial and stromal hyperplasia in the prostate. Some cases demonstrate an almost pure smooth-muscle proliferation, although most demonstrate a fibroadenomyomatous pattern of hyperplasia.

In the bladder, obstruction leads to smooth-muscle-cell hypertrophy. Biopsy specimens of trabeculated bladders demonstrate evidence of scarce smooth-muscle fibers with an increase in collagen.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Levi A Deters, MD  Staff Physician, Department of Urology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Raymond A Costabile, MD  Jay Y Gillenwater Professor of Urology and Vice Chairman, Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Strategy, University of Virginia Health System

Raymond A Costabile, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Medical Association, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Raymond J Leveillee, MD, FRCS(Glasg)  Professor of Clinical Urology, Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Chief, Division of Endourology/Laparoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Urology, Jackson Memorial Hospital

Raymond J Leveillee, MD, FRCS(Glasg) is a member of the following medical societies: American Urological Association, Endourological Society, Sigma Xi, and Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Disclosure: ACMI/Gyrus Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Boston Scientific Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Applied Medical Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Intuitive Surgical Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Intio Grant/research funds Other

Charles R Moore, MD  Endourology Fellow, Department of Urology, University of Miami School of Medicine

Charles R Moore, MD, is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American Urological Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Vipul R Patel, MD  Consulting Surgeon, Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital Celebration Health

Vipul R Patel, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Endourological Society, Ohio State Medical Association, and Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Disclosure: Intuitive Surgical Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Pfizer Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Chief Editor

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS  Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, University of Tennessee Medical Center

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association, Sexual Medicine Society of North America, and Tennessee Medical Association

Disclosure: Lilly Consulting fee Advisor; Astellas Consulting fee Speaking and teaching; Watson Consulting fee Speaking and teaching; Allergan Consulting fee Speaking and teaching

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author Vincent G Bird, MD, to the development and writing of the source article.

References
  1. Seftel AD, Rosen RC, Rosenberg MT, Sadovsky R. Benign prostatic hyperplasia evaluation, treatment and association with sexual dysfunction: practice patterns according to physician specialty. Int J Clin Pract. Apr 2008;62(4):614-22. [Medline].

  2. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, Donnell RF, et al. Update on AUA Guideline on the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. Mar 17 2011;[Medline].

  3. Carballido J, Fourcade R, Pagliarulo A, et al. Can benign prostatic hyperplasia be identified in the primary care setting using only simple tests? Results of the Diagnosis IMprovement in PrimAry Care Trial. Int J Clin Pract. Sep 2011;65(9):989-996. [Medline].

  4. American Cancer Society. 2009. American Cancer Society - Learn About Prostate Cancer. Available at http://www.cancer.org/docroot/lrn/lrn_0.asp. Accessed 1/29/2009.

  5. McConnell JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, et al. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Diagnosis and Treatment. Clinical Practice Guideline. No. 8, AHCPR Publication No. 94-0582. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research,. Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1994.

  6. AUA Clinical Guidelines - Management of BPH ('03/Updated '06). Available at http://www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and-quality-care/clinical-guidelines.cfm?sub=bph. Accessed 1/29/2009.

  7. Emberton M, Cornel EB, Bassi PF, Fourcade RO, Gómez JM, Castro R. Benign prostatic hyperplasia as a progressive disease: a guide to the risk factors and options for medical management. Int J Clin Pract. Jul 2008;62(7):1076-86. [Medline].

  8. Hellstrom WJ, Sikka SC. Effects of acute treatment with tamsulosin versus alfuzosin on ejaculatory function in normal volunteers. J Urol. Oct 2006;176(4 Pt 1):1529-33. [Medline].

  9. Cantrell MA, Bream-Rouwenhorst HR, Steffensmeier A, Hemerson P, Rogers M, Stamper B. Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome associated with alpha1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. Ann Pharmacother. Apr 2008;42(4):558-63. [Medline].

  10. Bell CM, Hatch WV, Fischer HD, Cernat G, Paterson JM, Gruneir A, et al. Association between tamsulosin and serious ophthalmic adverse events in older men following cataract surgery. JAMA. May 20 2009;301(19):1991-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Nickel JC, Gilling P, Tammela TL, Morrill B, Wilson TH, Rittmaster RS. Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS). BJU Int. Aug 2011;108(3):388-94. [Medline].

  12. Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Miller GJ, Ford LG, et al. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. Jul 17 2003;349(3):215-24. [Medline].

  13. Andriole GL, Bostwick DG, Brawley OW, Gomella LG, Marberger M, Montorsi F, et al. Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 1 2010;362(13):1192-202. [Medline].

  14. Madersbacher S, Marszalek M, Lackner J, Berger P, Schatzl G. The long-term outcome of medical therapy for BPH. Eur Urol. Jun 2007;51(6):1522-33. [Medline].

  15. Montorsi F, Roehrborn C, Garcia-Penit J, Borre M, Roeleveld TA, Alimi JC, et al. The effects of dutasteride or tamsulosin alone and in combination on storage and voiding symptoms in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): 4-year data from the Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study. BJU Int. Feb 23 2011;[Medline].

  16. McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P, et al. The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group. N Engl J Med. Feb 26 1998;338(9):557-63. [Medline].

  17. McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, Andriole GL Jr, Dixon CM, Kusek JW. The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. Dec 18 2003;349(25):2387-98. [Medline].

  18. Roehrborn CG. Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily prevents overall clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia but not acute urinary retention: results of a 2-year placebo-controlled study. BJU Int. Apr 2006;97(4):734-41. [Medline].

  19. Vallancien G, Emberton M, Alcaraz A, Matzkin H, van Moorselaar RJ, Hartung R. Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 3-year experience in real-life practice. BJU Int. Apr 2008;101(7):847-52. [Medline].

  20. Montorsi F, Roehrborn C, Garcia-Penit J, et al. The effects of dutasteride or tamsulosin alone and in combination on storage and voiding symptoms in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): 4-year data from the Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study. BJU Int. May 2011;107(9):1426-31. [Medline].

  21. Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J, Damião R, Major-Walker K, Morrill B. The effects of dutasteride, tamsulosin and combination therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic enlargement: 2-year results from the CombAT study. J Urol. Feb 2008;179(2):616-21; discussion 621. [Medline].

  22. Barry MJ, Meleth S, Lee JY, et al. Effect of Increasing Doses of Saw Palmetto Extract on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. Sep 28 2011;306(12):1344-1351. [Medline].

  23. Sildenafil [package insert]. New York, NY: Pfizer Inc.; 2002.

  24. Vardenafil [package insert]. Pittsburgh, Pa: Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation/GlaxoSmithKline; 2003.

  25. Tadalafil [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Lilly ICOS LLC; 2005.

  26. Mulhall JP, Guhring P, Parker M, Hopps C. Assessment of the impact of sildenafil citrate on lower urinary tract symptoms in men with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. Jul 2006;3(4):662-7. [Medline].

  27. Sotelo R, Spaliviero M, Garcia-Segui A, et al. Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. Mar 2005;173(3):757-60. [Medline].

  28. Malek RS, Kuntzman RS, Barrett DM. Photoselective potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the benign obstructive prostate: observations on long-term outcomes. J Urol. Oct 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1344-8. [Medline].

  29. Kuntz RM. Laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol. Jun 2007;25(3):241-7. [Medline].

  30. Elzayat EA, Habib EI, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new "gold standard". Urology. Nov 2005;66(5 Suppl):108-13. [Medline].

  31. Barry MJ, Cockett AT, Holtgrewe HL, et al. Relationship of symptoms of prostatism to commonly used physiological and anatomical measures of the severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. Aug 1993;150(2 Pt 1):351-8. [Medline].

  32. Kristal AR, Arnold KB, Schenk JM, Neuhouser ML, Goodman P, Penson DF. Dietary patterns, supplement use, and the risk of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. Am J Epidemiol. Apr 15 2008;167(8):925-34. [Medline].

  33. Arai Y, Fukuzawa S, Terai A, Yoshida O. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: relation between clinical response and prostate histology. Prostate. Feb 1996;28(2):84-8. [Medline].

  34. Gallegos PJ, Frazee LA. Anticholinergic therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pharmacotherapy. Mar 2008;28(3):356-65. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Normal prostate anatomy. The prostate is located at the apex of the bladder and surrounds the proximal urethra.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) diagnosis and treatment algorithm.
Basic management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.