eMedicine Specialties > Urology > Cancer, Testicle

Testicular Seminoma

Author: Michael B Williams, MD, MS, Fellow, Department of Urologic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center
Coauthor(s): Paul Schellhammer, MD, Chairman, Program Director, Professor, Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School; John W Davis, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: May 21, 2009

Introduction

Background

The study of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) is a unique area of urologic oncology, as treatment algorithms have benefited from numerous randomized prospective clinical trials (unlike prostate cancer) and because metastatic disease is highly responsive to multimodal treatment (unlike renal cell carcinoma). Seminoma is a histologic subtype of GCTs, which are discussed separately as nonseminomas in Germ Cell Tumors.

The interest in GCTs is disproportional to its incidence because of its fascinating pathologic subtypes, success of multimodal therapy (even for metastatic disease), and almost universal incidence in otherwise healthy males aged 15-35 years. Testicular GCTs have various pathologic subtypes, including seminoma, embryonal, yolk sac, teratoma, and choriocarcinoma. The most important clinical distinction is between seminoma and nonseminoma, two broad categories with different treatment algorithms: (1) Seminoma as a classification refers to pure seminoma upon histopathologic review, and (2) any nonseminomatous elements (even if seminoma is prevalent) change the classification to nonseminoma.

Pathophysiology

Testicular seminoma is a pathologic diagnosis in which only seminomatous elements are observed upon histopathologic review after a radical orchiectomy and in which serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is within the reference range. Any elevation of AFP levels or nonseminomatous elements in the testis specimen mandates diagnosis of nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT) and an appropriate treatment change.

GCTs have the following subtypes and frequencies: seminoma (40%), embryonal (25%), teratocarcinoma (25%), teratoma (5%), and choriocarcinoma (pure; 1%). Seminomas can be further subdivided into one of three categories based on histology: classic, anaplastic, and spermatocytic (see Histologic Findings).1

Germ cell carcinoma in situ (CIS) is a premalignant condition with a natural history of progression to seminoma or embryonal cancer. Patients with infertility, intersex disorders, cryptorchidism, prior contralateral GCTs, or atrophic testes more commonly have CIS. Histologically, it demonstrates intratubular atypical germ cells within seminiferous tubules. Most patients with seminomas (except spermatocytic seminoma) and NSGCTs have CIS or severe atypia associated with the primary tumor.2 In patients with GCTs, 5% of those with contralateral testes harbor CIS.3

Testicular microcalcifications observed on scrotal sonograms were long held to be implicated in the development of testicular carcinoma. However, a recent analysis of 83 patients with asymptomatic microcalcifications observed for 5 years demonstrated only one with testicular carcinoma development over the interim. This represented an odds ratio for the study population of 317 (95% CI, 36-2756), with over 98% of men with asymptomatic microcalcifications having a benign course. A recommendation of continued monthly self-examination without further intervention was given for management of this indolent finding.4

Frequency

United States

Testicular GCTs are rare, representing only 1%-2% of all male malignancies and occurring in 1 of 250 men by age 65 years; however, GCT is the most common malignancy in men aged 15-35 years. Incidence rates are 3.7 and 0.9 cases per 100,000 persons per year for whites and blacks, respectively.5

International

The incidence of testis cancer has increased from the early 1960s to the mid 1980s. Nonwhite populations have a lower incidence than white populations. The highest rates of testis cancer are in Denmark (11.5 cases per 100,000 persons per year), Norway (9 cases per 100,000 persons per year), and Switzerland (11 cases per 100,000 persons per year). Rates vary across Europe.6

A review by Bray and colleagues (2006) of 41 cancer registries in 14 countries found the seminoma rates to be highest in Denmark and Switzerland (9 cases per 100,000 persons per year) and the lowest rates in Japan, Israel, and Finland (1-3 cases per 100,000 persons per year).7

Race

Established data sets have consistently demonstrated a higher incidence of GCTs in whites than in African Americans—as high as a 5:1 ratio. McGlynn et al (2005) published an analysis of 9 registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973-2001. They found an increasing incidence among African Americans starting in the 1990s. The increased incidence was 100% for GCTs overall—124% for seminoma and 64% for nonseminoma. The reasons for this increase are unclear, and the author's review of the data suggests environmental or nonperinatal factors (occupation, physical activity, diet) rather than early screening as the predominant cause.8

Age

Testicular GCTs represent the most common malignancy in men aged 15-35 years. Seminoma accounts for one third of these diagnoses.9

Clinical

History

  • Common presentation
    • Typically, a male aged 15-35 years presents with a painless testicular lump that has been noticeable for several days to months.
    • Delay in diagnosis is common because of (1) a patient's failure to perform self-examinations, (2) a patient's failure to alert the physician about the mass, or (3) a physician's delay while treating the patient for presumed epididymoorchitis or testicular trauma.
    • Patients commonly have abnormal findings on semen analysis at presentation, and they may be subfertile.10
    • Patients may present with a hydrocele, and scrotal ultrasonography may identify a nonpalpable testis tumor. The presence of a hydrocele complicates manual examination and identification of a testicular lump, nodule, or mass.
    • Overall, in approximately 75% of patients, the seminomas are localized (stage I) at diagnosis. However, 15% have metastatic disease to the regional lymph nodes, and 5-10% have involvement of juxtaregional nodes or visceral metastases.
  • Uncommon presentation
    • Testicular pain, possibly with an acute onset, especially when associated with a hydrocele, prevents adequate physical examination.
    • A testis tumor may become metastatic and may manifest as large retroperitoneal and/or chest lesions, while the primary tumor is nonpalpable. Scrotal ultrasonography may locate the primary tumor. Histopathology of the primary testis often shows a focus of tumor surrounded by fibrous scar, termed burned-out testis cancer.
    • In 1996, Miller and associates reported on a series of patients with previously nonpalpable testes that were explored and incorrectly diagnosed as vanished testes. A subsequent seminoma was diagnosed intra-abdominally.11

Causes

  • Patients with history of cryptorchidism have a 10- to 40-times increased risk of testis cancer; 10% of patients with GCTs have a history of cryptorchidism (see Image 1).11

    Testicular seminoma. A 57-year-old man presents w...

    Testicular seminoma. A 57-year-old man presents with abdominal pain of slow onset. CT scanning shows a large 25-cm retroperitoneal lesion encompassing the aorta and renal vasculature and displacing the right kidney laterally. The patient had a history of cryptorchidism repaired at age 8 years. Testes were normal and descended; however, ultrasonography showed a small 5-mm lesion on the right testis, which proved to be pure seminoma at orchiectomy. The beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level was 70 mIU/mL (reference range, <5 mIU/mL), and the alpha-fetoprotein level was within the reference range; no metastatic lesions were observed above the diaphragm, indicating stage IIb (bulky), T1N3M0. The patient was referred for 4 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

    Testicular seminoma. A 57-year-old man presents w...

    Testicular seminoma. A 57-year-old man presents with abdominal pain of slow onset. CT scanning shows a large 25-cm retroperitoneal lesion encompassing the aorta and renal vasculature and displacing the right kidney laterally. The patient had a history of cryptorchidism repaired at age 8 years. Testes were normal and descended; however, ultrasonography showed a small 5-mm lesion on the right testis, which proved to be pure seminoma at orchiectomy. The beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level was 70 mIU/mL (reference range, <5 mIU/mL), and the alpha-fetoprotein level was within the reference range; no metastatic lesions were observed above the diaphragm, indicating stage IIb (bulky), T1N3M0. The patient was referred for 4 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

    • Risk is greater for the abdominal versus inguinal location of undescended testis.
    • An abdominal testis is more likely to be seminoma, while a testis surgically brought to the scrotum by orchiopexy is more likely to be NSGCT.
  • Orchiopexy allows for earlier detection by physical examination but does not alter the risk of GCT.
  • Genetic changes in the form of amplifications and deletions are observed mainly in the 12p11.2-p12.1 chromosomal regions.12
    • A gain of 12p sequences is associated with invasive growth of both seminomas and NSGCTs.
    • In contrast, spermatocytic seminoma shows a gain of chromosome 9, while most infantile yolk sac tumors and teratomas show no chromosomal changes.
  • Somatic mutations of the KIT gene occur in approximately 5% of all testicular GCTs. Of these, Coffey and colleagues (2008) demonstrated that only seminomas contain activating mutations of the KIT gene.13
  • Other risks include trauma, mumps, and maternal estrogen exposure.
  • Hemminki and colleagues (2004) demonstrated a familial risk for testicular cancer, with a 4-fold increased risk in a male with a father who had a GCT and a 9-fold increased risk if a brother was affected.14

More on Testicular Seminoma

Overview: Testicular Seminoma
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Testicular Seminoma
Treatment & Medication: Testicular Seminoma
Follow-up: Testicular Seminoma
Multimedia: Testicular Seminoma
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Looijenga LH, Oosterhuis JW. Pathogenesis of testicular germ cell tumours. Rev Reprod. May 1999;4(2):90-100. [Medline].

  2. Klein FA, Melamed MR, Whitmore WF Jr. Intratubular malignant germ cells (carcinoma in situ) accompanying invasive testicular germ cell tumors. J Urol. Mar 1985;133(3):413-5. [Medline].

  3. von der Maase H, Rorth M, Walbom-Jorgensen S. Carcinoma in situ of contralateral testis in patients with testicular germ cell cancer: study of 27 cases in 500 patients. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). Nov 29 1986;293(6559):1398-401. [Medline].

  4. DeCastro BJ, Peterson AC, Costabile RA. A 5-year followup study of asymptomatic men with testicular microlithiasis. J Urol. Apr 2008;179(4):1420-3; discussion 1423. [Medline].

  5. Swerdlow AJ. Epidemiology of Testicular Cancer. In: Raghavan D, Scher H, Leibel S, Lange P, eds. Principles and Practice of Genitourinary Oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.

  6. Parkin DM, Muir CS. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Comparability and quality of data. IARC Sci Publ. 1992;(120):45-173. [Medline].

  7. Bray F, Ferlay J, Devesa SS, McGlynn KA, Møller H. Interpreting the international trends in testicular seminoma and nonseminoma incidence. Nat Clin Pract Urol. Oct 2006;3(10):532-43. [Medline].

  8. McGlynn KA, Devesa SS, Graubard BI, Castle PE. Increasing incidence of testicular germ cell tumors among black men in the United States. J Clin Oncol. Aug 20 2005;23(24):5757-61. [Medline].

  9. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2008;58(2):71-96. [Medline].

  10. Panidis D, Rousso D, Stergiopoulos K. The effect of testicular seminoma in semen quality. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. Apr 1999;83(2):219-22. [Medline].

  11. Miller FH, Whitney WS, Fitzgerald SW. Seminomas complicating undescended intraabdominal testes in patients with prior negative findings from surgical exploration. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 1999;172(2):425-8. [Medline].

  12. Richie JP. Neoplasms of the Testis. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell's Urology. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1998.

  13. Coffey J, Linger R, Pugh J, Dudakia D, Sokal M, Easton DF, et al. Somatic KIT mutations occur predominantly in seminoma germ cell tumors and are not predictive of bilateral disease: report of 220 tumors and review of literature. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Jan 2008;47(1):34-42. [Medline].

  14. Hemminki K, Li X. Familial risk in testicular cancer as a clue to a heritable and environmental aetiology. Br J Cancer. May 4 2004;90(9):1765-70. [Medline].

  15. Horstman WG. Scrotal imaging. Urol Clin North Am. Aug 1997;24(3):653-71. [Medline].

  16. Schwerk WB, Schwerk WN, Rodeck G. Testicular tumors: prospective analysis of real-time US patterns and abdominal staging. Radiology. Aug 1987;164(2):369-74. [Medline].

  17. Tsatalpas P, Beuthien-Baumann B, Kropp J, Manseck A, Tiepolt C, Hakenberg OW, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography for detection and treatment control of malignant germ cell tumors. Urol Int. 2002;68(3):157-63. [Medline].

  18. Cremerius U, Wildberger JE, Borchers H, Zimny M, Jakse G, Günther RW. Does positron emission tomography using 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose improve clinical staging of testicular cancer?--Results of a study in 50 patients. Urology. Nov 1999;54(5):900-4. [Medline].

  19. Spermon JR, De Geus-Oei LF, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Oyen WJ. The role of (18)fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in initial staging and re-staging after chemotherapy for testicular germ cell tumours. BJU Int. Apr 2002;89(6):549-56. [Medline].

  20. Hinz S, Schrader M, Kempkensteffen C, Bares R, Brenner W, Krege S. The role of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of residual masses after chemotherapy for advanced stage seminoma. J Urol. Mar 2008;179(3):936-40; discussion 940. [Medline].

  21. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 5th ed. New York, NY: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.

  22. Prow DM. Germ cell tumors: staging, prognosis, and outcome. Semin Urol Oncol. May 1998;16(2):82-93. [Medline].

  23. Jones WG, Fossa SD, Mead GM, Roberts JT, Sokal M, Horwich A, et al. Randomized trial of 30 versus 20 Gy in the adjuvant treatment of stage I Testicular Seminoma: a report on Medical Research Council Trial TE18, European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 30942 (ISRCTN18525328). J Clin Oncol. Feb 20 2005;23(6):1200-8. [Medline].

  24. Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Lee AK, Strom SS. Mortality after cure of testicular seminoma. J Clin Oncol. Feb 15 2004;22(4):640-7. [Medline].

  25. Oliver RT, Mason MD, Mead GM, von der Maase H, Rustin GJ, Joffe JK, et al. Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial. Lancet. Jul 23-29 2005;366(9482):293-300. [Medline].

  26. Dreicer R, Ritter MA. Management of stage III-IV (C) seminoma. In: Raghavan D, Scher H, Leibel S, Lange P, eds. Principles and Practice of Genitourinary Oncology. New York, NY: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.

  27. Travis LB, Fosså SD, Schonfeld SJ, McMaster ML, Lynch CF, Storm H. Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: focus on long-term survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. Sep 21 2005;97(18):1354-65. [Medline].

  28. Daugaard G, Giwercman A, Skakkebaek NE. Should the other testis be biopsied?. Semin Urol Oncol. Feb 1996;14(1):8-12. [Medline].

  29. Herr HW, Sheinfeld J. Is biopsy of the contralateral testis necessary in patients with germ cell tumors?. J Urol. Oct 1997;158(4):1331-4. [Medline].

  30. Warde P, Gospodarowicz MK, Banerjee D. Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I testicular seminoma treated with surveillance. J Urol. May 1997;157(5):1705-9; discussion 1709-10. [Medline].

  31. Miki T, Saki S, Kotake T. [The role of salvage surgery following chemotherapy in advanced testicular cancer]. Hinyokika Kiyo. Oct 1994;40(10):951-5. [Medline].

  32. Motzer R, Bosl G, Heelan R. Residual mass: an indication for further therapy in patients with advanced seminoma following systemic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. Jul 1987;5(7):1064-70. [Medline].

  33. Duchesne GM, Stenning SP, Aass N. Radiotherapy after chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma--a diminishing role. MRC Testicular Tumour Working Party. Eur J Cancer. May 1997;33(6):829-35. [Medline].

  34. De Santis M, Becherer A, Bokemeyer C, Stoiber F, Oechsle K, Sellner F, et al. 2-18fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is a reliable predictor for viable tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma: an update of the prospective multicentric SEMPET trial. J Clin Oncol. Mar 15 2004;22(6):1034-9. [Medline].

  35. Bauman GS, Venkatesan VM, Ago CT. Postoperative radiotherapy for Stage I/II seminoma: results for 212 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Sep 1 1998;42(2):313-7. [Medline].

  36. Beahrs O, Henson D, Hutter R. Handbook for staging of cancer. In: Manual of Staging of Cancer. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott; 1993:195-7.

  37. Bredael JJ, Vugrin D, Whitmore WF Jr. Autopsy findings in 154 patients with germ cell tumors of the testis. Cancer. Aug 1 1982;50(3):548-51. [Medline].

  38. Coleman JM, Coleman RE, Turner AR, Radstone CR, Champion AE. The management and clinical course of testicular seminoma: 15 years' experience at a single institution. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1998;10(4):237-41. [Medline].

  39. Kodama M, Murakami M, Kodama T. Chronological transition of the age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIRs) of 20 major neoplasias from early 1960s to mid-1980s. Anticancer Res. Jan-Feb 1999;19(1B):779-87. [Medline].

  40. van Rooy EM, Sagerman RH. Long-term evaluation of postorchiectomy irradiation for stage I seminoma. Radiology. Jun 1994;191(3):857-61. [Medline].

Keywords

testicular seminoma, testis cancer, cancer of the testes, testis germ cell carcinoma, testicular cancer, seminoma, germ cell tumor, GCT, radical orchiectomy, germ cell carcinoma in situ, germ cell CIS, classic seminoma, anaplastic seminoma, spermatocytic seminoma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Michael B Williams, MD, MS, Fellow, Department of Urologic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Paul Schellhammer, MD, Chairman, Program Director, Professor, Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School
Paul Schellhammer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Urological Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John W Davis, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
John W Davis, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons and American Urological Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Gamal Mostafa Ghoniem, MD, FACS, Fellowship Program Director, Clinical Professor of Surgery, Head, Section of Voiding Dysfunction, Female Urology and Reconstruction, Cleveland Clinic Florida
Gamal Mostafa Ghoniem, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urogynecologic Society, American Urological Association, Florida Medical Association, International Continence Society, and International Urogynaecology Association
Disclosure: Astellas Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Coloplasty Consulting fee Consulting; Uroplasty Consulting fee Consulting

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Dan Theodorescu, MD, PhD, Paul Mellon Professor of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
Dan Theodorescu, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Cancer Society, American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Medical Society of Virginia, Society for Basic Urologic Research, and Society of Urologic Oncology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS, David A Bloom Professor of Urology, Director of Division of Minimally Invasive Urology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan
J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Catholic Medical Association, Endourological Society, Society for Urology and Engineering, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, and Society of Urologic Oncology
Disclosure: Terumo Corporation Consulting fee Consulting; Omeros Corporation Consulting fee Consulting

Chief Editor

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS, Professor of Urology, Director, Center for Laparoscopy and Endourology, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Association of Military Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons, Endourological Society, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, and Society of University Urologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.