Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Filarial Hydrocele Treatment & Management

  • Author: Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS; Chief Editor: Edward David Kim, MD, FACS  more...
 
Updated: Nov 17, 2014
 

Medical Therapy

In 1997, the World Health Assembly (WHA) passed a resolution calling for the initiation of lymphatic filariasis–elimination programs by the governments of endemic areas. By 2013, the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) had implemented mass drug administration of the two-drug regimens (diethylcarbamazine [DEC] plus albendazole or ivermectin plus albendazole) or administration of DEC-fortified salt in 60 countries. Since 2000, the program has resulted in the delivery of a cumulative total of 4.9 billion doses of medicine to 1 billion people.[9]

Epidemiological studies indicate that several countries have demonstrated a near-total absence of transmissions as a result of mass drug administration. Programs aimed at alleviating and preventing disability from lymphatic filariasis are also under way.

Subclinical cases should be treated to prevent lymphatic damage because most patients develop full clinical disease. Young adults in endemic areas should be screened for the presence of the parasite and treated if test results are positive.

Diethylcarbamazine

DEC is effective against both microfilariae and adult worms and is considered the drug of choice. It clears the blood of microfilariae, reduces the opportunity for mosquito-borne transmission of the parasite, and reverses filarial-associated hematuria and proteinuria.

DEC does not reverse existing lymphatic damage and does not change the course of pathology in patients with established disease. Patients should be tested every 6-12 months for the presence of the parasite, and patients whose test results are positive should be re-treated.

DEC is only partially effective against adult worms; therefore, ultrasonography of the scrotum should be performed 1 month after treatment; the presence of any residual worms is an indication for re-treatment.

Recommended schedules are 6 mg/kg/d for a total of 72 mg/kg for Wuchereria bancrofti infection and 4 mg/kg/d for a total of 60 mg/kg for infection with Brugia malayi.

DEC causes allergic reactions (Mazzotti reactions), especially in patients with high microfilarial counts. Headache, fever, nausea, vomiting, local pain, and swelling over lymph nodes and along lymphatic vessels have been reported. Therefore, patients with heavy infection should start with low doses (3 mg/kg body weight/d) and gradually increase the dose.

Ivermectin

Ivermectin is a newer antiparasitic drug that causes fewer adverse effects. It has proven to be an effective microfilaricide after a single oral dose of 20-25 mcg/kg of body weight. Because of its low cost, single oral dose, and few adverse effects, it is becoming the drug of choice for early filarial infection. However, ivermectin does not affect adult filarial worms.

Foot care and skin care are essential in patients with lymphedema. Patients should be encouraged to use antiseptic soap to clean their skin daily. Early infections should be treated vigorously.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Various surgical procedures have been developed to remove the edematous tissue in patients with genital elephantiasis. The principles of these operations follow general plastic-surgery principles.

The penile and scrotal skin and subcutaneous tissues can be excised and reconstructed using a partial-thickness graft from normal skin in the upper part of the body without lymphedema. Unmeshed grafts yield a better cosmetic appearance to the penis, while meshed grafts are preferred for scrotal reconstruction. In females, split-thickness grafts can be used to reconstruct the vulva and the perineal skin.

Filarial hydroceles are more difficult to excise surgically than idiopathic hydroceles because of scarring and fibrosis. The ideal procedure is to excise the hydrocele completely with an intact sac. In some cases, this is impossible, and partial excision and eversion of sac edges behind the testis is sufficient.

To determine the appropriate level of care for patients requiring surgical repair, Capuano and Capuano have proposed using their clinical classification of filarial hydrocele (see Clinical). They conclude that a stage I or II hydrocele, associated with grade 0 or 1 penis burial, could be considered a simple hydrocele; surgical treatment is simple, with no anticipated early complications, and can be performed at a level II facility (as defined by the World Health Organization).[4]

A stage III or IV hydrocele associated with grade 2, 3 or 4 penis burial could be considered a complicated hydrocele. These require a longer, more demanding operation and seem to pose a greater risk for complications, so a level III health care facility would be better adapted.[4]

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Antibiotics should be initiated the night prior to surgery and continue for a total of 5 days. Analgesics in the form of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or oral acetaminophen should be administered as appropriate.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Standard postoperative care applies. Most patients may be discharged home the same day. Patients with undue swelling, pain, or oozing from the wound or those in whom a drain has been placed should be observed for 24-48 hours.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Patients should return for a follow-up visit within 7-10 days.

Previous
Next

Complications

Wound healing is slow and complicated in patients with filariasis because of the lymphedema and chronic scarring. Patients who require excision and grafting of the scrotal or penile skin are at higher risk for graft failure. Wound infections are also common in these patients.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Established filarial lymphedema is a progressive condition that tends to follow a stable course within 10-15 years of clinical presentation. No medical treatment has been proven to reverse this pathology; therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are of utmost importance.

A review of surgical reconstruction techniques of 48 patients over 10 years demonstrates excellent outcomes.[10]

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Because of the recent advances in medical treatment with single-dose therapies, global elimination of lymphatic filariasis is now considered possible. To interrupt transmission, districts where lymphatic filariasis is endemic must be identified and community-wide programs must be implemented to treat the entire at-risk population. Community education programs are necessary to raise awareness in affected patients.

In January 1998, the pharmaceutical company SmithKline Beecham (now Glaxo SmithKline) announced a massive donation program of albendazole (several billion doses) to support this effort. This donation was coupled with a decision by Merck & Co, Inc, to expand its ongoing ivermectin (Mectizan) donation program to include treatment of lymphatic filariasis.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS Professor of Urology, Director, Center for Laparoscopy and Endourology, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, Association of Military Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons, American Urological Association, Endourological Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Rizk El-Galley, MD, MB, BCh, FRCS Director of Clinical Research, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Alabama

Rizk El-Galley, MD, MB, BCh, FRCS is a member of the following medical societies: American Urological Association, Royal College of Surgeons of England, SWOG

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joe Miller, MD Staff Physician, Division of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Joe Miller, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Student Association/Foundation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Chief Editor

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, University of Tennessee Medical Center

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Tennessee Medical Association, Sexual Medicine Society of North America, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Repros.

Additional Contributors

Edmund S Sabanegh, Jr, MD Chairman, Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Edmund S Sabanegh, Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society of Andrology, Society of Reproductive Surgeons, Society for the Study of Male Reproduction, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Urological Association, SWOG

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Sherchand JB, Obsomer V, Thakur GD, Hommel M. Mapping of lymphatic filariasis in Nepal. Filaria J. 2003 Mar 19. 2(1):7. [Medline].

  2. Lammie PJ, Cuenco KT, Punkosdy GA. The pathogenesis of filarial lymphedema: is it the worm or is it the host?. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Dec. 979:131-42; discussion 188-96. [Medline].

  3. Taylor MJ. A new insight into the pathogenesis of filarial disease. Curr Mol Med. 2002 May. 2(3):299-302. [Medline].

  4. Capuano GP, Capuano C. Surgical management of morbidity due to lymphatic filariasis: the usefulness of a standardized international clinical classification of hydroceles. Trop Biomed. 2012 Mar. 29(1):24-38. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  5. Bernhard P, Magnussen P, Lemnge MM. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with diethylcarbamazine for the treatment of hydrocoele in an area of Tanzania endemic for lymphatic filariasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Sep-Oct. 95(5):534-6. [Medline].

  6. Weil GJ, Lammie PJ, Weiss N. The ICT Filariasis Test: A rapid-format antigen test for diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis. Parasitol Today. 1997 Oct. 13(10):401-4. [Medline].

  7. Cano J, Rebollo MP, Golding N, Pullan RL, Crellen T, Soler A, et al. The global distribution and transmission limits of lymphatic filariasis: past and present. Parasit Vectors. 2014 Oct 11. 7(1):466. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Mishra S, Achary KG, Mandal NN, Tripathy A, Kar SK, Bal MS. Hydrocele fluid: Can it be used for immunodiagnosis of lymphatic filariasis?. J Vector Borne Dis. 2014 Jul-Sep. 51(3):188-93. [Medline].

  9. Global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: progress report, 2013. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2014 Sep 19. 89(38):409-18. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  10. Singh V, Sinha RJ, Sankhwar SN, Kumar V. Reconstructive Surgery for Penoscrotal Filarial Lymphedema: A Decade of Experience and Follow-up. Urology. 2011 May. 77(5):1228-31. [Medline].

  11. Approaches to the urogenital manifestations of lymphatic filiariasis. 2002.

  12. Bosworth W, Ewert A. The effect of Streptococcus on the persistence of Brugia malayi and on the production of elephantiasis in cats. Int J Parasitol. 1975 Dec. 5(6):583-9. [Medline].

  13. Cohen LB, Nelson G, Wood AM, Manson-Bahr PE, Bowen R. Lymphangiography in filarial lymphoedema and elephantiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1961 Nov. 10:843-8. [Medline].

  14. Dreyer G, Norões J, Figueredo-Silva J, Piessens WF. Pathogenesis of lymphatic disease in bancroftian filariasis: a clinical perspective. Parasitol Today. 2000 Dec. 16(12):544-8. [Medline].

  15. Eigege A, Richards FO Jr, Blaney DD, Miri ES, Gontor I, Ogah G. Rapid assessment for lymphatic filariasis in central Nigeria: a comparison of the immunochromatographic card test and hydrocele rates in an area of high endemicity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Jun. 68(6):643-6. [Medline].

  16. Hussein O, El Setouhy M, Ahmed ES, Kandil AM, Ramzy RM, Helmy H, et al. Duplex Doppler sonographic assessment of the effects of diethylcarbamazine and albendazole therapy on adult filarial worms and adjacent host tissues in Bancroftian filariasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Oct. 71(4):471-7. [Medline].

  17. Nielsen NO, Bloch P, Simonsen PE. Lymphatic filariasis-specific immune responses in relation to lymphoedema grade and infection status. I. Cellular responses. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002 Jul-Aug. 96(4):446-52. [Medline].

  18. Ottesen EA. The human filariases: New understanding, new therapeutic strategies. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 1994. 7:550-8.

  19. Ottesen EA, Vijayasekaran V, Kumaraswami V, Perumal Pillai SV, Sadanandam A, Frederick S, et al. A controlled trial of ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine in lymphatic filariasis. N Engl J Med. 1990 Apr 19. 322(16):1113-7. [Medline].

  20. Tobian AA, Tarongka N, Baisor M, Bockarie M, Kazura JW, King CL. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound detection and risk factors for filarial-associated hydroceles. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Jun. 68(6):638-42. [Medline].

  21. Weekly epidemiological record. 2006.

 
Previous
Next
 
Filarial infection causing enlarged pubic lymph nodes.
Laparoscopic view of enlarged lymphatics secondary to filarial infection.
Lymphocele of the right spermatic cord.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.