eMedicine Specialties > Urology > Cancer, Wilms Tumor and Neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma: Workup

Author: Byron D Joyner, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Program Director, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Natalya Lopushnyan, Yale University School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Dec 4, 2007

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • General laboratory studies should be routinely obtained in children suspected of having neuroblastoma.
    • A CBC count should be obtained to determine if the child has anemia, which typically does not occur until the tumor has become widely disseminated.
    • Once dissemination occurs, abnormalities in findings of coagulation studies (prothrombin time [PT], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]) may secondary to liver involvement. Thrombocytopenia due to overwhelming bone marrow involvement may also be present.
    • The erythrocyte sedimentation rate, a nonspecific acute-phase reactant, is elevated in classic neuroblastoma.
  • Specific laboratory studies should be obtained when the diagnosis of neuroblastoma is considered.
    • Metabolic tumor by-products are useful as diagnostic inclusion criteria for detecting neuroblastoma.
    • Elevated metabolic catecholamine by-products can be detected in the urine of patients with neuroblastoma.
    • Phenylalanine and tyrosine are catecholamine precursors, which are converted through a sequence of enzymatic events to dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine.
    • DOPA and dopamine are metabolized into their final product, homovanillic acid (HVA), while norepinephrine and epinephrine are metabolized into vanillylmandelic acid (VMA).
    • Ninety percent of neuroblastoma tumors secrete these by-products. This fact becomes clinically relevant because children with dedifferentiated tumors excrete higher levels of HVA than VMA. This occurs because dedifferentiated tumors have lost the final enzymatic pathway that converts HVA to VMA. A low VMA-to-HVA ratio is consistent with a poorly differentiated tumor and indicative of a poor prognosis.
    • Neuroblastoma cells lack the enzyme that converts norepinephrine to epinephrine. Despite this fact, elevated levels of norepinephrine are not identified in the serum of patients with neuroblastoma. This might be explained by at least 2 processes—(1) norepinephrine may be catabolized within the tumor; or (2) tyrosine hydrolase, the initial enzyme in catecholamine synthesis, is subject to a negative feedback loop by norepinephrine. For either or both reasons, norepinephrine does not reach detectable serum levels.
    • A LaBrosse VMA spot test may be used to screen patients in certain institutions. It is economical but has low sensitivity and specificity.
    • High-performance liquid chromatography has a much lower false-positive rate and is more sensitive than the LaBrosse VMA spot test, but its only drawback is that it is more expensive and is therefore often used only to confirm a positive result on spot test.
  • Nonspecific tumor markers can be identified in patients with neuroblastoma.
    • Neuron-specific enolase (NSE), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), and ferritin are markers useful in the identification of active disease, as well as in prognostication.
    • Approximately 96% of patients with metastatic neuroblastomas demonstrate an elevated NSE level, which has been associated with a poor prognosis.

Imaging Studies

Radiographic assessment is recommended in all infants and children with an abdominal mass. The standard diagnostic imaging modalities include plain abdominal radiography (kidneys, ureters, bladder [KUB]), renal/bladder ultrasonography, bone scintigraphy, and CT scanning or MRI.

  • KUB most commonly reveals finely stippled calcifications of the abdomen or posterior mediastinum.
  • Renal/bladder ultrasonography improves the diagnostic evaluation and is probably the single best imaging modality to obtain. Ultrasonography is noninvasive and provides relevant information regarding the laterality, consistency, and size of the mass.
  • Abdominal CT scanning or MRI usually follows ultrasonography. Both of these studies are more invasive, in that they require general sedation for young children. The benefit is that they enhance the ultrasonographic findings by providing information about regional lymph nodes, vessel invasion, and distant metastatic disease.
  • Bone scintigraphy and a skeletal survey to detect cortical bone disease are helpful in the diagnosis of neuroblastoma. Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is a compound taken up by catecholaminergic cells that competes for uptake even in neuroblastoma cells. In this way, MIBG is quite sensitive and specific in the detection of metastasis to bones and soft tissue, with highest sensitivity (91-97%) in the detection of bone deposits. Bone scintigraphy using 99Tc diphosphonate and a skeletal bone survey to detect cortical bone disease are essential if MIBG scintigraphy results are negative in the bone. MIBG is recommended for re-assessment both during and after therapy in high-risk patients with MIBG-avid disease at diagnosis.
  • Expression of somatostatin (SS) receptors has been described in neuroblastoma cell lines and tumors. Studies have shown that these tumors can be successfully targeted with radioactive SS analogs as a method of detection. Currently, the indication for radio-labeled SS analog in children with neuroblastoma is not well-defined because this method is less sensitive than MIBG scan (64% vs 94%). However, because neuroblastoma SS receptors are associated with favorable clinical and biological prognostic factors, radio-labeled SS analog could provide valuable information. In fact, improved survival has been found in patients with SS receptor–positive neuroblastoma. However, more studies need to be performed to confirm the benefits of SS receptor scanning.

Diagnostic Procedures

  • The biopsy is the sine qua non in the diagnostic evaluation of neuroblastoma. To confirm the diagnosis of neuroblastoma, histologic evidence of neural origin or differentiation is required. Samples of tumor tissue can be viewed via light or electron microscopy or via immunohistochemistry. Another option is to sample bone marrow, a frequent metastatic site for neuroblastoma.
  • The literature is confusing in terms of the number of bone marrow aspirates or biopsies needed to diagnose neuroblastoma. Recently, an international committee on neuroblastoma staging recommended obtaining 2 bone marrow aspirates and 2 biopsies, 1 from each posterior iliac crest.
  • The issue of biopsies might become obsolete because immunocytology of marrow aspirates may offer the single best source of diagnostic information. Recently, a large body of published work has addressed the use of immunocytochemical and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based technologies to detect neuroblastoma cells and neuroblastoma-specific transcripts such as tyrosine hydroxylase and disialoganglioside (GD2) synthase in marrow or blood samples. This method is used to assess minimal disease during the course of treatment. Although these techniques can greatly increase sensitivity, whether this increased sensitivity provides prognostic information about the likelihood of relapse is still unclear.

Histologic Findings

The 3 distinct histologic patterns of the neurocristopathies include neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma. They represent a spectrum of maturation and dedifferentiation. The typical neuroblastoma is characterized by small uniform cells that contain dense hyperchromatic nuclei and scant cytoplasm. A neuritic process called neuropil is pathognomonic of all except the most primitive neuroblastoma. Homer-Wright pseudorosettes are clusters of neuroblasts surrounding areas of eosinophilic neuropil and are observed in 15-50% of patients. If identified, they are diagnostic of neuroblastoma.

The minimal diagnostic criteria for diagnosing neuroblastoma have been established by an international group of conferees and corresponding participants. These criteria include (1) unequivocal pathologic diagnosis or (2) unequivocal bone marrow (syncytia) and elevated levels of urinary catecholamine metabolic by-products. Both of these diagnostic criteria require a histopathologic diagnosis.

Molecular pathogenesis
 
The cancer genes most commonly altered in adult carcinogenesis (eg, TP53, CDKN2A, ras) are rarely aberrant in neuroblastoma. TP53 -inactivating mutations are uncommon in primary tumors due to neuroblastoma, although they have been documented in cell lines among patients with relapsing neuroblastoma. Thus, with the exception of N-myc, major pathways of human neoplasia do not seem to be deregulated. Indeed, the only reliable genetically engineered murine model of neuroblastoma results from targeted overexpression of human N-myc cDNA to the murine neural crest.

Staging

At least 6 different staging systems for neuroblastoma exist. Historically, each staging system represents a temporal improvement in the understanding of the tumor. However, the presence of so many systems has not only confounded the literature but also complicated the comparison of studies between institutions. Twenty years ago, the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) was established to provide a uniform staging system.

The INSS is a clinical, radiographic, and surgical appraisal of children with neuroblastoma. The system combines many of the most important diagnostic criteria from each of the staging systems and includes initial distribution and surgical resectability of the tumor. Arabic numerals are used to distinguish this staging system from other systems.

  • Stage 1 is characterized by a localized tumor with complete gross excision, with or without microscopic residual disease. Representative ipsilateral lymph nodes that test negative for tumor are present microscopically (nodes attached to and removed with the primary tumor may test positive).
  • Stage 2A is characterized by a localized tumor with incomplete gross excision; representative ipsilateral nonadherent lymph nodes that test negative for tumor are present microscopically.
  • Stage 2B is characterized by a localized tumor with or without complete gross excision, with ipsilateral nonadherent lymph nodes that test positive for tumor. Enlarged contralateral lymph nodes must test negative microscopically.
  • Stage 3 is an unresectable unilateral tumor infiltrating across the midline, with or without regional lymph node involvement; a localized unilateral tumor with contralateral regional lymph node involvement; or a midline tumor with bilateral extension by infiltration (unresectable) or by lymph node involvement. The midline is defined as the vertebral column. Tumors that originate on one side and cross the midline must infiltrate to or beyond the opposite side of the vertebral column.
  • Stage 4 is any primary tumor disseminated to distant lymph nodes, bone, bone marrow, liver, skin, and/or other organs (except as defined for stage 4S).
  • Stage 4S (S = special)
    • Stage 4S is characterized by a localized primary tumor (as defined for stage 1, 2A, or 2B), with dissemination limited to skin, liver, and/or bone marrow (limited to infants aged <1 y).
    • Marrow involvement should be minimal (ie, <10% of total nucleated cells identified as malignant via bone biopsy or bone marrow aspirate).
    • More extensive bone marrow involvement is considered stage 4 disease.
    • The results of the MIBG scan (if performed) should be negative for disease in the bone marrow.
    • Stage 4S is the most unusual group, comprising approximately 5% of patients with neuroblastoma.
    • This stage occurs in infants younger than 12 months and is characterized by hepatomegaly, subcutaneous nodules, and a positive result on bone marrow biopsy.
    • Everything else being equal, these children would normally be classified as having stage 1 or 2 disease; however, disease in this special group of infants almost always spontaneously regresses. Nonetheless, infants younger than 2 months frequently develop extensive and rapidly progressive intrahepatic expansion of neuroblastoma that can result in respiratory compromise.
    • The 5-year survival rate in patients with stage-4S disease is 75%.

According to the INSS, the neuroblastoma can be diagnosed based on either (1) characteristic histopathologic findings of tumor or presence of tumor cells in a bone marrow aspirate or biopsy sample or (2) elevated urinary catecholamine levels.

Specific requirements to stage neuroblastoma include (1) bone marrow aspirates and biopsy samples, (2) body CT scan (excluding head, if not clinically indicated), (3) bone scan, and (4) MIBG scintigraphy.

Stage for stage, infants with neuroblastoma have a better prognosis than older children. In fact, statistically, age is the most significant clinical prognosticator for neuroblastoma. Forty percent of infants (<1 y) have localized neuroblastoma, compared with 20% of children older than 1 year. Additionally, nearly 70% of children older than 1 year have disseminated neuroblastoma, compared with less than 25% of infants.

More on Neuroblastoma

Overview: Neuroblastoma
Workup: Neuroblastoma
Treatment: Neuroblastoma
Follow-up: Neuroblastoma
Multimedia: Neuroblastoma
References

References

  1. Virchow R. Hyperplasie der Zirbel und der Nebennieren. In: Die Krankhaften Geschwulste. Vol 2. 1864-65.

  2. Marchand F. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der normalen und pathologischen Anatomie der Glandula carotica und der Nebennieren. Festschrift fur Ruduloph. Vichows Arch. 1891;5:578.

  3. Herxheimer G. Ueber Turmoren des Nebennierenmarkes, insbesondere das Neuroblastoma sympaticum. Beitr Pathol Anat. 1914;57:112.

  4. Cushing H, Wolback SB. The transformation of a malignant paravertebral sympathicoblastoma into a benign ganglioneuoma. Am J Pathol. 1927;3:203.

  5. Everson TC, Cole WH. Spontaneous regression of neuroblastoma. In: Everson TC, Cole WH, eds. Spontaneous Regression of Cancer. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1966:88.

  6. Mason GA, Hart-Mercer J, Millar EJ, Strang LB, Wynne NA. Adrenaline-secreting neuroblastoma in an infant. Lancet. Aug 17 1957;273(6990):322-5. [Medline].

  7. Beckwith JB, Perrin EV. In situ neuroblastomas: A contribution to the natural history of neural crest tumors. Am J Pathol. Dec 1963;43:1089-104. [Medline].

  8. Knudson AG Jr, Strong LC. Mutation and cancer: neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma. Am J Hum Genet. Sep 1972;24(5):514-32. [Medline].

  9. Nitschke R, Smith EI, Shochat S, et al. Localized neuroblastoma treated by surgery: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. Aug 1988;6(8):1271-9. [Medline].

  10. Shimada H, Chatten J, Newton WA Jr, et al. Histopathologic prognostic factors in neuroblastic tumors: definition of subtypes of ganglioneuroblastoma and an age-linked classification of neuroblastomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. Aug 1984;73(2):405-16. [Medline].

  11. Bostrom B, Nesbit ME Jr, Brunning RD. The value of bone marrow trephine biopsy in the diagnosis of metastatic neuroblastoma. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Fall 1985;7(3):303-5. [Medline].

  12. Brodeur GM, Castleberry RP. Neuroblastoma. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. Vol 1. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1993:739-67.

  13. Brodeur GM, Green AA, Hayes FA. Cytogenetic studies of primary human neuroblastomas. Prog Cancer Res Ther. 1980;12:73.

  14. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. Aug 1993;11(8):1466-77. [Medline].

  15. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Barrett A, et al. International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. Dec 1988;6(12):1874-81. [Medline].

  16. Connolly AM, Pestronk A, Mehta S, et al. Serum autoantibodies in childhood opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome: an analysis of antigenic targets in neural tissues. J Pediatr. Jun 1997;130(6):878-84. [Medline].

  17. Grosfeld JL. Neuroblastoma. In: Pediatric Surgery. Vol 1. 1998:405-19.

  18. Homsy YL, Austin PF. Neuroblastoma. In: Graham SD Jr, ed. Glenn's Urologic Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:687-90.

  19. Howman-Giles R, Shaw PJ, Uren RF, Chung DK. Neuroblastoma and other neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med. Jul 2007;37(4):286-302. [Medline].

  20. Kim S, Chung DH. Pediatric solid malignancies: neuroblastoma and Wilms' tumor. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 2006;86(2):469-87, xi. [Medline].

  21. Kushner BH, Helson L. Coordinated use of sequentially escalated cyclophosphamide and cell- cycle-specific chemotherapy (N4SE protocol) for advanced neuroblastoma: experience with 100 patients. J Clin Oncol. Nov 1987;5(11):1746-51. [Medline].

  22. Look AT, Hayes FA, Shuster JJ, et al. Clinical relevance of tumor cell ploidy and N-myc gene amplification in childhood neuroblastoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. Apr 1991;9(4):581-91. [Medline].

  23. Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL. Neuroblastoma. Lancet. Jun 23 2007;369(9579):2106-20. [Medline].

  24. Matthay KK, Sather HN, Seeger RC, et al. Excellent outcome of stage II neuroblastoma is independent of residual disease and radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1989;7(2):236-44. [Medline].

  25. Mora J, Cheung NK, Kushner BH, et al. Clinical categories of neuroblastoma are associated with different patterns of loss of heterozygosity on chromosome arm 1p. J Mol Diagn. Feb 2000;2(1):37-46. [Medline].

  26. Roberts S, Creamer K, Shoupe B, et al. Unique management of stage 4S neuroblastoma complicated by massive hepatomegaly: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Feb 2002;24(2):142-4. [Medline].

  27. Ross JA, Davies SM. Screening for neuroblastoma: progress and pitfalls. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Feb 1999;8(2):189-94. [Medline].

  28. Rufini V, Calcagni ML, Baum RP. Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med. Jul 2006;36(3):228-47. [Medline].

  29. Russell DS, Rubenstein LJ. Tumors of peripheral neuroblasts and ganglion cells. In: Pathology of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1989:900.

  30. Russo C, Cohn SL, Petruzzi MJ, de Alarcon PA. Long-term neurologic outcome in children with opsoclonus-myoclonus associated with neuroblastoma: a report from the Pediatric Oncology Group. Med Pediatr Oncol. Apr 1997;28(4):284-8. [Medline].

  31. Tonini GP, Boni L, Pession A, et al. MYCN oncogene amplification in neuroblastoma is associated with worse prognosis, except in stage 4s: the Italian experience with 295 children. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1997;15(1):85-93. [Medline].

  32. Weinstein JL, Katzenstein HM, Cohn SL. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroblastoma. Oncologist. 2003;8(3):278-92. [Medline].

  33. Young JL Jr, Ries LG, Silverberg E, et al. Cancer incidence, survival, and mortality for children younger than age 15 years. Cancer. Jul 15 1986;58(2 Suppl):598-602. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

neuroblastoma, great mimicker, the great mimicker, intra-abdominal malignancy, extracranial solid tumor, Ewing sarcoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, neuroectodermal tumors, undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, glioma, sympathetic ganglia, ganglioneuroma, sympathoblastoma, ganglioneuroma, neurocristopathy, ganglioneuroblastoma, metastatic neuroblastoma, localized neuroblastoma, disseminated neuroblastoma, stage 4S neuroblastoma, Pepper syndrome, “blueberry muffin” babies, “blueberry muffin” baby, Hutchinson syndrome, Kerner-Morrison syndrome, Wilms tumor, congenital mesoblastic nephroma, primitive neuroblasts, neuropil, Homer-Wright pseudorosettes, Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Byron D Joyner, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Program Director, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center
Byron D Joyner, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, Massachusetts Medical Society, Society of University Urologists, Society of Urology Chairpersons and Program Directors, and Washington State Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Natalya Lopushnyan, Yale University School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

CME Editor

J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS, David A Bloom Professor of Urology, Director of Division of Minimally Invasive Urology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan
J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Catholic Medical Association, Endourological Society, Society for Urology and Engineering, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, and Society of Urologic Oncology
Disclosure: Terumo Corporation Consulting fee Consulting; Omeros Corporation Consulting fee Consulting

Chief Editor

Allen R Wyler, MD, Former Medical Director, Northstar Neuroscience, Inc
Allen R Wyler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, and Society of Neurological Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.