Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Phimosis, Adult Circumcision, and Buried Penis

  • Author: Ryan P Terlecki, MD; Chief Editor: Edward David Kim, MD, FACS  more...
 
Updated: Nov 18, 2015
 

Background

Phimosis

Phimosis is defined as the inability of the prepuce (foreskin) to be retracted behind the glans penis in uncircumcised males.

Nearly all males are born with congenital phimosis, a benign condition that resolves in the overwhelming majority of infants as they transition into childhood. In 1949, Douglas Gairdner showed that only 4% of infants had a fully retractable foreskin at birth but that 90% did by age 3 years. Contemporary work demonstrates that only 1% of males aged 17 years still have an unretractable foreskin. Adult phimosis (ie, pathologic or true phimosis) may be caused by poor hygiene or an underlying medical condition (eg, diabetes mellitus).

Uncomplicated pathologic phimosis is usually amenable to conservative medical treatment. Failure of medical treatment warrants surgical intervention, usually in the traditional form of a circumcision or preputioplasty.

Although phimosis is the most common indication for adult circumcision, other reported indications include paraphimosis, balanitis without phimosis, condyloma, redundant foreskin, Bowen disease, carcinoma, trauma, disease prophylaxis (eg, HIV infection), and patient choice.

Buried penis

Buried penis was described in the early 20th century as a penis of normal size that lacks an appropriate sheath of skin and is located beneath the integument of the abdomen, thigh, or scrotum. This condition is more common in children, usually presenting in neonates or obese prepubertal boys; however, it can also be seen in adults and has been observed in both circumcised and uncircumcised individuals. Marginal cases may not be diagnosed until adulthood, when increased fat deposition accentuates the problem.

Several classification systems of buried penis have been proposed, although none has been universally adopted in the literature. Maizels et al (1986) differentiated among the terms concealed (before circumcision), trapped (cicatricial [scarred] after circumcision), and buried (associated with adolescence and obesity).[1]

In most congenital pediatric cases, the buried penis is self-limited. In untreated adults, however, the condition tends to worsen as the abdominal pannus continues to grow.

Next

History of the Procedure

Circumcision and adult circumcision

Circumcision is one of the earliest elective operations known to man. Historically, this procedure has been performed for various religious reasons, social reasons, or both. The practice is considered a commandment in Jewish law and a rule of cleanliness in Islam, although it is not mentioned in the Quran. In biblical times, mothers were responsible for circumcising their newborn sons, with mohels gradually taking over. Priests in ancient Egypt would perform the procedure with their gold-impregnated thumbnail. Female circumcision, which is likely better termed "genital mutilation," has been practiced for centuries by some cultures but is an unacceptable practice and without medical benefit.

Adult circumcision for phimosis is described in textbooks dating from the early 19th century. Alternative procedures for adult phimosis were described as early as 1900 by Cloquet. Surgical attempts to restore the prepuce are also well documented, going as far back as the Old Testament. However, potential psychological and surgical complications have led to closer scrutiny of routine neonatal circumcision. Currently, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) neither recommends nor condemns routine neonatal circumcision.

Studies suggest that circumcised boys are at a lower risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs). To put this in perspective, the approximate likelihood of a UTI occurring in the first year of life is 1 in 100 in uncircumcised boys and 1 in 1000 in circumcised boys. A lower risk of malignancy is also reported in studies of circumcised men, although the incidence is also rare in uncircumcised men. Of note, this decreased risk seems to be associated only with infant circumcision and not with adult procedures.

The theory that circumcision contributes to prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) was encouraged by a 19th-century report of lower rates of syphilis in Jewish men. Van Howe et al (1999), in an earlier literature review, found no clear evidence that circumcision prevents STDs.[2] However, studies have demonstrated that human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, including oncogenic HPV infection, is more prevalent in uncircumcised men, regardless of demographics and sexual history.[3] Citing a link between the intact prepuce and sexually transmitted infection, some authorities have gone as far as suggesting that circumcision protects against prostate cancer.[4]

A recent meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials in South Africa,[5] Kenya,[6] and Uganda[7] has demonstrated that circumcision decreases the risk of HIV infection among heterosexual men by nearly 60%.[8] Data from a mathematical model suggest that routine circumcision in southern sub-Saharan Africa could prevent 2 million HIV infections over 10 years.[9] The results of the African randomized trials have sparked speculative interest in male circumcision to reduce HIV infection in the United States, especially in areas such as New York City.[10] Pask et al (2008) have suggested that the protective benefit of circumcision against HIV infection may result from removal of Langerhans cells and that enhanced keratinization conferred by topical estrogen may therefore represent an alternative to circumcision.[11]

Additionally, controlled studies by Tobian et al have shown the efficacy of circumcision in reducing the incidence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection, and a follow-up study suggested that it may protect female partners from acquisition in men already infected.[12, 13]

Further evaluation of these trials has shown no deleterious effects on male erectile function or sexual satisfaction, and 97.1% of female partners reported no change or improved sexual enjoyment after circumcision of their male partner.[14]

Other indications for circumcision exist. Genital lichen sclerosus appears to be a disease generally restricted to uncircumcised males and is often cured by circumcision.[15] Additionally, removal of foreskin remnants has shown to be an effective modality in select patients with premature ejaculation.[16]

Surgical correction of buried penis

The first description of the buried penis was in 1919 by Keyes. The first attempted surgical correction of this problem was by Schloss in 1959; in 1968, successful correction was performed in an adult by Glanz. Since then, numerous techniques to correct buried penis have been developed.

Previous
Next

Problem

Phimosis

Phimosis is defined as a condition in which the foreskin cannot be retracted behind the head of the penis. Depending on the situation, this condition may be considered either physiologic or pathologic.

Physiologic, or congenital, phimosis is a normal condition of the newborn male. In 90% of cases, natural separation allows the foreskin to retract by age 3 years. However, phimosis persisting into late adolescence or early adulthood need not be considered abnormal.

The entity of pathologic, or true, phimosis is far less common and can affect children or adults. This is associated with cicatricial scarring of the prepuce that is often white in appearance. Phimosis may occur after circumcision if redundant inner prepuce slides back over the glans, with subsequent cicatricial scarring and contraction.

Buried penis

Buried penis is a true congenital disorder in which a penis of normal size lacks the proper sheath of skin and lies hidden beneath the integument of the abdomen, thigh, or scrotum. The literature, on occasion, also refers to this condition as a hidden or concealed penis. Trapped penis is a condition in which the penis becomes inconspicuous secondary to a cicatricial scar, usually after overzealous circumcision. Webbed penis is characterized by obscuration of the penile shaft by scrotal skin webs at the penoscrotal junction. Micropenis (also known as microphallus) represents a penis less than 2 standard deviations below the mean in length when measured in the stretched state. Diminutive penis is a penis that is small, malformed, or both secondary to epispadias, exstrophy, severe hypospadias, chromosomal abnormalities, or intersex conditions.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Phimosis

Nearly all males are born with physiologic phimosis. Data have shown that the foreskin is retractable in 90% of boys by age 3 years. Only 1% of boys have physiologic phimosis that persists until age 17 years. Thus, most healthy adult men should not have phimosis; the presence of the disorder in an adult male should raise the suspicion of balanitis (infection of the foreskin), balanoposthitis (infection of glans and foreskin), diabetes,[17] or malignancy.

Approximately 1 in 6 men in the world are circumcised. In the United States, circumcision is the fifth most common procedure; in 1992, the foreskin was removed in 62% of newborn males in the United States.

Buried penis

Congenital buried penis is uncommon. The incidence of buried penis in adulthood is unknown, but it is highly likely that many cases go unreported.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Phimosis

Physiologic phimosis is the rule in newborn males. Formation of the prepuce is complete by 16 weeks' gestation. The inner prepuce and glans penis share a common, fused mucosal epithelium at birth. This epithelium separates via desquamation over time as the proper hormonal and growth factors are produced. Thus, neonatal circumcision is a surgical treatment of normal anatomy.

Pathologic, or true, phimosis has several different etiologies. The most common cause is infection, such as posthitis, balanitis, or a combination of the two (balanoposthitis). Diabetes mellitus may predispose to such infections.

Adult circumcision is most commonly performed to correct phimosis. When circumcision is performed for phimosis, 25%-46% of removed foreskins are histologically normal. Other indications for adult circumcision include balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO), infection without phimosis; paraphimosis; Bowen disease; carcinoma; condylomas (warts); trauma; religious or social reasons; disease prophylaxis (eg, HIV infection); and personal preference.

Buried penis

Various etiologic factors have been proposed to explain congenital buried penis. Recent literature favors dysgenetic dartos tissue with abnormal attachments proximally and to the dorsal cavernosum. A prominent prepubic fat pad is also a common primary factor, in addition to dysgenetic dartos fascia. Secondary buried penis may be the result of an overzealous circumcision with subsequent cicatricial scar (trapped penis), a large hernia, or a hydrocele.

Adults with buried penis are commonly obese and often have a history of trauma or surgery. There is an observed association with diabetes mellitus, which may aggravate the pathologic process. Another additive factor in select patients includes the significant laxity of abdominal skin following gastric bypass.[18] Adults with this condition may have undergone abdominoplasty with overzealous release of attachments between the scarpa and dartos fasciae, penile-lengthening procedures, or other genitoinguinal surgeries.

Another possible cause of buried penis in the adult is genital lymphedema. This may be idiopathic, iatrogenic (from prior surgery), or acquired due to filariasis.[19]

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Phimosis

The foreskin of an uncircumcised child should not be forcefully retracted. This may result in significant bleeding, as well as glanular excoriation and injury. Consequently, dense fibrous adhesions may form during the healing process, leading to true pathologic phimosis.

Circumcision has been promoted as a means of reducing the risk of UTIs, which are more common in uncircumcised males younger than 6 months. The risk in circumcised infants is approximately 1 in 1000, whereas the risk in uncircumcised infants is about 1 in 100. Some researchers contend that the risk of UTI in these children is not high enough to warrant mandatory circumcision. Interestingly, nongonococcal urethritis (NGU) may be more common in circumcised men. However, a multicenter study suggested that, if a child has associated vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), the benefit of reduced infection risk may be valid support for surgery.[20]

Another cited indication for circumcision is prevention of STDs. Numerous case-control studies concerning the relationship between the foreskin and HIV infection have been published, with inconsistent results and no definite link. Therefore, it seems that STD prevention is not a justification for routine circumcision. Of note, of the developed nations, the United States has one of the highest rates of STDs, HIV infection, and male circumcision.

Infant circumcision seems to decrease the risk of penile cancer,[21] whereas later circumcision does not. Penile cancer is a rare disease in the United States, with an incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 people. In developing countries, the incidence is higher and accounts for up to 10% of malignancies in some African and South American nations. Although primarily a disease of older men, penile cancer has been reported in children. The lowest incidence has been reported in Jews, with a similar incidence in Muslims; both groups have high rates of neonatal circumcision.

Daling et al performed a population-based case-control study in 2005 that examined the importance of circumcision in patients with penile cancer. Preputial status was not found to be a statistically significant factor in penile cancer. The investigators concluded that the role of circumcision in penile cancer prevention is unclear.[22] Several studies suggest that poor hygiene may be a stronger risk factor than circumcision status. Although smegma has been implicated as a carcinogenic agent, definitive evidence is lacking.

Adult phimosis may be caused by repeated episodes of balanitis or balanoposthitis. Such infections are commonly due to poor personal hygiene (failure to regularly clean under the foreskin).

Phimosis may be a presenting symptom of early diabetes mellitus. When the residual urine of a patient with diabetes mellitus becomes trapped under the foreskin, the combination of a moist environment and glucose in the urine may lead to a proliferation of bacteria, with subsequent infection, scarring, and eventual phimosis.

Buried penis

The penis is properly formed by 16 weeks' gestation. Congenital buried penis is caused by a developmental anomaly in which the dartos fascia has not developed into the normal elastic configuration to allow the penile skin to move freely over the deeper tissues of the penile shaft. Instead, the dartos layer is inelastic, which prevents the forward extension of the penis and holds it buried under the pubis.

Other possible contributing factors to congenital buried penis include excess prepubic fat, scrotal webbing, deficient penile skin, loose skin, an abnormally low position at which the crura separate, abnormal attachments between the Buck fascia and the tunica albuginea, and insufficient attachment of dartos fascia and skin to the Buck fascia.

The pathophysiology of buried penis in adults differs from that in children and includes iatrogenically induced scar contracture with concurrent descent of the abdominal fat pad. Because the penis is suspended from the pubis by the suspensory ligament, it remains fixed, unlike the prepubic fat. As fat descends over the penis, excessive moisture and bacterial overgrowth may occur. Chronic infection may lead to skin maceration and more scar contracture, further aggravating the problem. In many children, this condition is self-limited. However, in adults, total body fat content typically increases with age, causing the buried penis to worsen over time.

Previous
Next

Presentation

Phimosis

Congenital or physiologic phimosis is clinically asymptomatic so is not a cause for concern. It is often associated with "ballooning" of the foreskin during voiding. This is a self-limited phenomenon that, in the absence of pathologic phimosis, does not indicate urinary tract obstruction. Pathologic, or true, phimosis is far less common. Symptoms include skin irritation, dysuria, bleeding, and occasionally enuresis or urinary retention. Physical examination usually reveals white cicatricial scarring at the preputial ring. Meuli et al (1994) devised the following scoring system to rate the severity of phimosis:[23]

  • Grade I - Fully retractable prepuce with stenotic ring in the shaft
  • Grade II - Partial retractability with partial exposure of the glans
  • Grade III - Partial retractability with exposure of the meatus only
  • Grade IV - No retractability

Pathologic phimosis may be due to BXO, a genital form of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. This condition affects both men and boys and represents an absolute indication for circumcision, which may be curative. The etiology of BXO is unknown, and it may represent a premalignant state. Clinically, it presents as severe phimosis and possibly meatal stenosis, glanular lesions, or both.

In older men, when the phimosis is severe, the distal foreskin often appears swollen and erythematous with cracked fissures (see image below). Men who are affected report pain and discomfort during sexual activity or when they attempt to retract the foreskin. Unlike in the pediatric population, lower urinary tract voiding symptoms are absent. In older men, acquired phimosis is often associated with poor hygiene but may be a product of diabetes mellitus.

Phimotic foreskin. The distal foreskin is edematou Phimotic foreskin. The distal foreskin is edematous, with cracked fissures. The patient was unable to retract the foreskin.

All uncircumcised adult men should have the foreskin retracted to exclude occult carcinoma as a part of a complete urologic examination. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis may manifest as an ulcerated fungating mass of the glans or the prepuce. Alternatively, carcinoma in situ or penile carcinoma may appear as a velvety macular lesion of the glans (erythroplasia of Queyrat) or the penile shaft (Bowen disease).

Buried penis

Most pediatric cases of buried penis present in neonates or prepubertal boys. The most common age range of patients at presentation is 6 months to 1 year. Adolescents who present with buried penis are usually obese, and weight loss should be advised. Patients may be uncircumcised or circumcised; the latter complicates repair. One series found that 77% of children presenting with buried penis had been previously circumcised, emphasizing a need for pediatric urologists to educate primary care physicians.

The reasons for presentation vary. Often, parents are concerned because they are unable to see the penis, which may also complicate proper hygiene. Occasionally, they may witness ballooning of the foreskin with voiding, and children may be persistently wet if they are voiding into the preputial sac.

Adolescents may report dysuria, dribbling between voids, trouble directing their urinary stream because of difficulty holding the penis, or embarrassment in the locker room. Some patients have a history of balanitis and balanoposthitis, and some have undergone a radical circumcision or even multiple circumcisions.

In addition to some of the symptoms seen in children, adults may present with sexual complaints. These include painful erection, sexual embarrassment, and difficulty with vaginal penetration, especially if the tip of the glans does not project past the male escutcheon. This condition may lead to the inability to void in a standing position and may cause the patient to soil himself while urinating in the seated position. Obesity and diabetes mellitus are commonly associated comorbidities.

On physical examination, which should include a supine evaluation, the penis may be concealed because it is buried in prepubic tissues; buried and enclosed in scrotal tissue (penis palmatus); trapped by phimosis, traumatic scar tissue, or postcircumcision cicatrix; or hidden secondary to a large hernia or hydrocele. A smooth transition from prepubic to penile skin indicates a buried penis. Trapped penis demonstrates a circumferential groove at the base of the penis. Only Maizels (1986)[1] and Burkholder (1983)[24] have noted an association between buried penis and renal anomalies. Other genitourinary anomalies have not been associated with this condition.

Previous
Next

Indications

Phimosis

The main medical indication for circumcision in children is pathologic phimosis. In a prospective long-term study, 40% of boys treated for phimosis were found to have BXO, which has been linked to the development of penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).[25] Although potent topical steroids may allow improvement and slow progression, total circumcision is the treatment of choice for BXO and may be curative.

Recurrent balanoposthitis, which affects 1% of boys, is also considered a relative indication for circumcision. However, this condition tends to be self-limited, and even if balanoposthitis is recurrent, preputioplasty and topical steroids represent alternatives to circumcision.[26, 27, 28, 29] In patients with balanoposthitis who are sufficiently troubled to warrant surgical intervention, circumcision is always curative.

Paraphimosis results from abuse or accident, not disease, of the foreskin and can be seen at any age. It represents the second most common indication for adult circumcision. Infants may present with paraphimosis if their parents have retracted the prepuce and failed to pull it forward thereafter. Reduction of the foreskin under sedation is almost always possible. However, in some situations, a dorsal slit or circumcision is required (see Paraphimosis). Unrecognized chronic paraphimosis or delay in diagnosis may result in urinary retention or even penile autoamputation.

Other indications for circumcision that are less common include small preputial tumors, multiple preputial cysts or condylomas, and penile lymphedema. A reasonable case may be made for circumcising boys with VUR who suffer from UTIs. In addition, the foreskin may be removed to perform a biopsy of lesions hidden under the prepuce or for definitive radiation therapy for penile cancer.

Occasions arise in which urethral instrumentation—in the form of a cystoscopy or Foley catheterization—is necessary. This may be quite problematic in an adult affected by severe phimosis. In such instances, an emergency bedside dorsal slit can be performed safely and expeditiously. After being discharged, the patient may proceed to undergo formal circumcision.

Many circumcisions are performed for social or religious reasons. Interestingly, only 1 out of 6 schools of Islamic law consider circumcision obligatory, whereas others feel it is to be recommended. Among religious Jews, circumcision is felt to be a commandment from their creator.

In summary, common indications for circumcision include the following:

  • Phimosis
  • Paraphimosis
  • Recurrent balanitis or balanoposthitis
  • Social or religious reasons

Buried penis

The primary reason that children are referred for correction of the buried penis is cosmesis. In the neonate, observation seems to be a viable option. Children younger than 3 years have a 58% chance of spontaneous resolution. Some pediatric urologists insist that this condition is a developmental stage that will resolve by puberty and feel that correction should therefore be deferred. Evidence has shown, however, that spontaneous resolution does not always occur. Also, in men and adolescents, measures such as diet and exercise are unlikely to be effective.

Other authors feel that, after age 3 years, buried penis requires correction. The primary reason cited is the importance of being able to void while standing during the period of toilet training. There are numerous other indications for repair. For example, a concealed penis can hamper proper hygiene, trap urine, and complicate voiding. This can lead to repeated infections, secondary phimosis, or even urinary retention. In addition, numerous investigators feel that children with buried penis are at risk for psychological and social trauma, even from an early age. Obese boys with a buried penis may be ostracized by their peers and withdraw socially. Surgery often relieves anxiety and may improve self-image.

In adults, buried penis tends to worsen over time as they accumulate more fat. The cicatricial scar does not loosen on its own over time. Urinary and sexual complications can greatly affect daily life. Therefore, surgery is likely necessary in these patients.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

The penis is composed of paired corpora cavernosa, the crura of which are attached to the pubic arch, and the corpus spongiosum (see image below). The proximal portion of the corpus spongiosum is referred to as the bulb of the penis, and the glans represents the distal expansion. The urethra traverses the corpus spongiosum to exit at the meatus. The cavernosal bodies produce the male erection when they are engorged with blood.

Cross-section through the body of the penis. Cross-section through the body of the penis.

The fascial layers of the penis are continuous with the fascial layers of the perineum and lower abdomen. Dartos fascia represents the superficial penile fascia. Deep to this lies the Buck fascia, which covers the tunica albuginea of the penile bodies. Proximally, the Buck fascia is in continuity with the suspensory ligament of the penis, which attaches to the symphysis pubis.

The penis is supplied by a superficial system of arteries that arise from the external pudendal arteries and a deep system of arteries that stem from the internal pudendal arteries (see images below). The superficial blood supply lies in the superficial penile fascia and supplies the penile skin and prepuce. The internal pudendal artery, which arises from the hypogastric artery, gives rise to the penile artery. The penile artery then gives rise to the bulbourethral artery, the urethral artery, and the cavernous artery (deep artery of the penis) before terminating as the dorsal artery of the penis.

The arterial blood supply of the penis arises from The arterial blood supply of the penis arises from the internal pudendal artery. The internal pudendal artery gives off branches to the bulbar artery, cavernosal artery, and dorsal penile artery. The bulbar artery continues on as the bulbourethral artery to supply the urethra. The cavernosal artery gives rise to the helicine arteries that are end arteries. The dorsal artery of the penis gives branches off to the circumflex arteries.
Dorsal view of the arterial and venous blood suppl Dorsal view of the arterial and venous blood supply of the penis.

Somatic nerve supply to the penis comes by way of the pudendal nerves, which eventually produce the dorsal nerves of the penis on each side. Although cutaneous innervation to the penis is primarily from branches of the pudendal nerve, the proximal portion is supplied by the ilioinguinal nerve after it leaves the superficial inguinal ring. The prepuce has somatosensory innervation by the dorsal nerve of the penis and branches of the perineal nerve. The glans is primarily innervated by free nerve endings and has poor fine-touch discrimination.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

Circumcision is generally not performed in children born prematurely or those with blood dyscrasias. It should not be performed in children with congenital penile anomalies such as the following:

  • Hypospadias
  • Epispadias
  • Chordee
  • Penile webbing
  • Buried penis
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ryan P Terlecki, MD Director, Men's Health Clinic, Director, Fellowship in Urologic Reconstruction, Prosthetic Urology, and Infertility, Director, Medical Student Education, Associate Professor of Urology, Wake Forest Baptist Health

Ryan P Terlecki, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Urological Association, Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Richard A Santucci, MD, FACS Specialist-in-Chief, Department of Urology, Detroit Medical Center; Chief of Urology, Detroit Receiving Hospital; Director, The Center for Urologic Reconstruction; Clinical Professor of Urology, Michigan State University College of Medicine

Richard A Santucci, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Societe Internationale d'Urologie (International Society of Urology), American Urological Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Chief Editor

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, University of Tennessee Medical Center

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Tennessee Medical Association, Sexual Medicine Society of North America, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Repros.

Additional Contributors

Leonard Gabriel Gomella, MD, FACS The Bernard W Godwin Professor of Prostate Cancer Chairman, Department of Urology, Associate Director of Clinical Affairs, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Leonard Gabriel Gomella, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Urological Association, Sigma Xi, Society for Basic Urologic Research, Society of University Urologists, Society of Urologic Oncology

Disclosure: Received consulting fee from GSK for consulting; Received honoraria from Astra Zeneca for speaking and teaching; Received consulting fee from Watson Pharmaceuticals for consulting.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Jong M. Choe, MD, FACS, and previous coauthor Hye Kim, RPh, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J. Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol. 1986 Jul. 136(1 Pt 2):268-71. [Medline].

  2. Van Howe RS. Does circumcision influence sexually transmitted diseases?: a literature review. BJU Int. 1999 Jan. 83 Suppl 1:52-62. [Medline].

  3. Hernandez BY, Wilkens LR, Zhu X, McDuffie K, Thompson P, Shvetsov YB, et al. Circumcision and human papillomavirus infection in men: a site-specific comparison. J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15. 197(6):787-94. [Medline].

  4. Morris BJ, Waskett J, Bailis SA. Case number and the financial impact of circumcision in reducing prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2007 Jul. 100(1):5-6. [Medline].

  5. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov. 2(11):e298. [Medline].

  6. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24. 369(9562):643-56. [Medline].

  7. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24. 369(9562):657-66. [Medline].

  8. Mills E, Cooper C, Anema A, Guyatt G. Male circumcision for the prevention of heterosexually acquired HIV infection: a meta-analysis of randomized trials involving 11,050 men. HIV Med. 2008 Jul. 9(6):332-5. [Medline].

  9. Londish GJ, Murray JM. Significant reduction in HIV prevalence according to male circumcision intervention in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Mar 3. [Medline].

  10. McKinney CM, Klingler EJ, Paneth-Pollak R, Schillinger JA, Gwynn RC, Frieden TR. Prevalence of adult male circumcision in the general population and a population at increased risk for HIV/AIDS in New York City. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Sep. 35(9):814-7. [Medline].

  11. Pask AJ, McInnes KJ, Webb DR, Short RV. Topical oestrogen keratinises the human foreskin and may help prevent HIV infection. PLoS ONE. 2008 Jun 4. 3(6):e2308. [Medline].

  12. Tobian AA, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Kigozi G, Gravitt PE, Laeyendecker O, et al. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26. 360(13):1298-309. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  13. Mahanta J, Borkakoty B, Biswas D, Walia K. Circumcision and herpes simplex virus-2 infection among spouses. Sex Transm Infect. 2010 Dec. 86(7):487. [Medline].

  14. Kigozi G, Lukabwe I, Kagaayi J, Wawer MJ, Nantume B, Kigozi G, et al. Sexual satisfaction of women partners of circumcised men in a randomized trial of male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. BJU Int. 2009 Dec. 104(11):1698-701. [Medline].

  15. Edmonds EV, Hunt S, Hawkins D, Dinneen M, Francis N, Bunker CB. Clinical parameters in male genital lichen sclerosus: a case series of 329 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Jun 27. [Medline].

  16. Namavar MR, Robati B. Removal of foreskin remnants in circumcised adults for treatment of premature ejaculation. Urol Ann. 2011 May. 3(2):87-92. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  17. Huang YC, Shindel AW, Chen CS, Huang YK, Wu CF, Lin JH, et al. Phimosis with Preputial Fissures as a Predictor of Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in Adults. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015 Sep 9. [Medline].

  18. Shermak MA, Chang D, Magnuson TH, Schweitzer MA. An outcomes analysis of patients undergoing body contouring surgery after massive weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15. 118(4):1026-31. [Medline].

  19. Pestana IA, Greenfield JM, Walsh M, Donatucci CF, Erdmann D. Management of "buried" penis in adulthood: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Oct. 124(4):1186-95. [Medline].

  20. Herndon CD, McKenna PH, Kolon TF, Gonzales ET, Baker LA, Docimo SG. A multicenter outcomes analysis of patients with neonatal reflux presenting with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. 1999 Sep. 162(3 Pt 2):1203-8. [Medline].

  21. Schoen EJ, Oehrli M, Colby Cd, Machin G. The highly protective effect of newborn circumcision against invasive penile cancer. Pediatrics. 2000 Mar. 105(3):E36. [Medline].

  22. Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, Schwartz SM, Shera KA, Wurscher MA. Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease. Int J Cancer. 2005 Sep 10. 116(4):606-16. [Medline].

  23. Meuli M, Briner J, Hanimann B, Sacher P. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus causing phimosis in boys: a prospective study with 5-year followup after complete circumcision. J Urol. 1994 Sep. 152(3):987-9. [Medline].

  24. Burkholder GV, Newell ME. New surgical treatment for micropenis. J Urol. 1983 Apr. 129(4):832-4. [Medline].

  25. Kiss A, Király L, Kutasy B, Merksz M. High incidence of balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys with phimosis: prospective 10-year study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005 Jul-Aug. 22(4):305-8. [Medline].

  26. Orsola A, Caffaratti J, Garat JM. Conservative treatment of phimosis in children using a topical steroid. Urology. 2000 Aug 1. 56(2):307-10. [Medline].

  27. Monsour MA, Rabinovitch HH, Dean GE. Medical management of phimosis in children: our experience with topical steroids. J Urol. 1999 Sep. 162(3 Pt 2):1162-4. [Medline].

  28. Dessanti A, Ginesu G, Iannuccelli M, Balata A. Phimosis. Preputial plasty using transversal widening on the dorsal side with EMLA local anesthetic cream. J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Apr. 40(4):713-5. [Medline].

  29. Chu CC, Chen KC, Diau GY. Topical steroid treatment of phimosis in boys. J Urol. 1999 Sep. 162(3 Pt 1):861-3. [Medline].

  30. Palmer JS, Elder JS, Palmer LS. The use of betamethasone to manage the trapped penis following neonatal circumcision. J Urol. 2005 Oct. 174(4 Pt 2):1577-8. [Medline].

  31. Peng Y, Masson P, Li PS, Chang Y, Tian L, Lee R, et al. No-needle local anesthesia for adult male circumcision. J Urol. 2010 Sep. 184(3):978-83. [Medline].

  32. Tang SH, Kamat D, Santucci RA. Modern management of adult-acquired buried penis. Urology. 2008 Jul. 72(1):124-7. [Medline].

  33. Westerman ME, Tausch TJ, Zhao LC, Siegel JA, Starke N, Klein AK, et al. Ventral Slit Scrotal Flap: A New Outpatient Surgical Option for Reconstruction of Adult Buried Penis Syndrome. Urology. 2015 Jun. 85 (6):1501-4. [Medline].

  34. Xu JG, Lv C, Wang YC, Zhu J, Xue CY. Management of concealed penis with modified penoplasty. Urology. 2015 Mar. 85 (3):698-702. [Medline].

  35. Liu F, Lin T, He D, Wei G, Liu J, Liu X, et al. New Technique for the Treatment of Buried Penis in Children. Urology. 2015 Nov 4. [Medline].

  36. Elmore JM, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ. Sutureless circumcision using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond): appraisal after 18-month experience. Urology. 2007 Oct. 70(4):803-6. [Medline].

  37. Warren AG, Peled ZM, Borud LJ. Surgical correction of a buried penis focusing on the mons as an anatomic unit. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Mar. 62(3):388-92. [Medline].

  38. Frenkl TL, Agarwal S, Caldamone AA. Results of a simplified technique for buried penis repair. J Urol. 2004 Feb. 171(2 Pt 1):826-8. [Medline].

  39. Cromie WJ, Ritchey ML, Smith RC, Zagaja GP. Anatomical alignment for the correction of buried penis. J Urol. 1998 Oct. 160(4):1482-4. [Medline].

  40. Brisson P, Patel H, Chan M, Feins N. Penoplasty for buried penis in children: report of 50 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Mar. 36(3):421-5. [Medline].

  41. Donatucci CF, Ritter EF. Management of the buried penis in adults. J Urol. 1998 Feb. 159(2):420-4. [Medline].

  42. Gillett MD, Rathbun SR, Husmann DA, Clay RP, Kramer SA. Split-thickness skin graft for the management of concealed penis. J Urol. 2005 Feb. 173(2):579-82. [Medline].

  43. Chopra CW, Ayoub NT, Bromfield C, Witt PD. Surgical management of acquired (cicatricial) buried penis in an adult patient. Ann Plast Surg. 2002 Nov. 49(5):545-9. [Medline].

  44. Blanton MW, Pestana IA, Donatucci CF, Erdmann D. A unique abdominoplasty approach in management of "buried" penis in adulthood. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 May. 125(5):1579-80. [Medline].

  45. Natali A, Rossetti MA. Complications of self-circumcision: a case report and proposal. J Sex Med. 2008 Dec. 5(12):2970-2. [Medline].

  46. Shaeer O. Restoration of the penis following amputation at circumcision: Shaeer's A-Y plasty. J Sex Med. 2008 Apr. 5(4):1013-21. [Medline].

  47. Isken T, Sen C, Isil E, Iscen D, Sozubir S, Gürbüz Y. A very rare complication: keloid formation after circumcision, and its treatment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Nov. 61(11):1405-7. [Medline].

  48. Fink KS, Carson CC, DeVellis RF. Adult circumcision outcomes study: effect on erectile function, penile sensitivity, sexual activity and satisfaction. J Urol. 2002 May. 167(5):2113-6. [Medline].

  49. Hosseini SR, Khazaeli MH, Atharikia D. Role of postcircumcision mucosal cuff length in lifelong premature ejaculation: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2008 Jan. 5(1):206-9. [Medline].

  50. Payne K, Thaler L, Kukkonen T, Carrier S, Binik Y. Sensation and sexual arousal in circumcised and uncircumcised men. J Sex Med. 2007 May. 4(3):667-74. [Medline].

  51. O'Hara K, O'Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner. BJU Int. 1999 Jan. 83 Suppl 1:79-84. [Medline].

  52. Herndon CD, Casale AJ, Cain MP, Rink RC. Long-term outcome of the surgical treatment of concealed penis. J Urol. 2003 Oct. 170(4 Pt 2):1695-7; discussion 1697. [Medline].

  53. Cheng F, Yu WM, Xia Y, Zhang XB, Yang SX, Ge MH. Effects of buried penis on the structure and function of corpus cavernosum in a rat model. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Jul. 123(13):1736-40. [Medline].

  54. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J Urol. 1994 Jul. 152(1):4-14. [Medline].

  55. Adham MN, Teimourian B, Mosca P. Buried penis release in adults with suction lipectomy and abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Sep. 106(4):840-4. [Medline].

  56. Ahmed A, Mbibi NH, Dawam D, Kalayi GD. Complications of traditional male circumcision. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1999 Mar. 19(1):113-7. [Medline].

  57. Alter GJ, Ehrlich RM. A new technique for correction of the hidden penis in children and adults. J Urol. 1999 Feb. 161(2):455-9. [Medline].

  58. American Academy of Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics. 1989 Aug. 84(2):388-91. [Medline].

  59. Babu R, Harrison SK, Hutton KA. Ballooning of the foreskin and physiological phimosis: is there any objective evidence of obstructed voiding?. BJU Int. 2004 Aug. 94(3):384-7. [Medline].

  60. Baskin LS, Canning DA, Snyder HM 3rd, Duckett JW Jr. Surgical repair of urethral circumcision injuries. J Urol. 1997 Dec. 158(6):2269-71. [Medline].

  61. Burnakis TG. Amyl nitrite for the treatment of penile tumescence. Hosp Pharm. 1991. 26:343.

  62. Chuang JH, Chen LY, Shieh CS, Lee SY. Surgical correction of buried penis: a review of 60 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Mar. 36(3):426-9. [Medline].

  63. Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int. 1999 Jan. 83 Suppl 1:34-44. [Medline].

  64. Craig JC, Knight JF, Sureshkumar P, et al. Effect of circumcision on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boys. J Pediatr. 1996 Jan. 128(1):23-7. [Medline].

  65. Devine. Concealed and webbed penis. Hinman F, ed. Atlas of Pediatric Urologic Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders and Co; 1998. 606-9.

  66. Dunsmuir WD, Gordon EM. The history of circumcision. BJU Int. 1999 Jan. 83 Suppl 1:1-12. [Medline].

  67. Fussell EN, Kaack MB, Cherry R, Roberts JA. Adherence of bacteria to human foreskins. J Urol. 1988 Nov. 140(5):997-1001. [Medline].

  68. Ginsburg CM, McCracken GH Jr. Urinary tract infections in young infants. Pediatrics. 1982 Apr. 69(4):409-12. [Medline].

  69. Glass JM. Religious circumcision: a Jewish view. BJU Int. 1999 Jan. 83 Suppl 1:17-21. [Medline].

  70. Gursel EO, Georgountzos C, Uson AC, et al. Penile cancer. Urology. 1973 Jun. 1(6):569-78. [Medline].

  71. Hollowood AD, Sibley GN. Non-painful paraphimosis causing partial amputation. Br J Urol. 1997 Dec. 80(6):958. [Medline].

  72. Holman JR, Stuessi KA. Adult circumcision. Am Fam Physician. 1999 Mar 15. 59(6):1514-8. [Medline].

  73. Hunter RH. Notes on the Development of the Prepuce. J Anat. 1935 Oct. 70(Pt 1):68-75. [Medline].

  74. Hutcheson JC. Male neonatal circumcision: indications, controversies and complications. Urol Clin North Am. 2004 Aug. 31(3):461-7, viii. [Medline].

  75. Johnson DE, Fuerst DE, Ayala AG. Carcinoma of the penis. Experience with 153 cases. Urology. 1973 May. 1(5):404-8. [Medline].

  76. Koudelka J, Docekalova S. [A ventral slit of the prepuce in phimosis]. Rozhl Chir. 1998 Sep. 77(9):402-4. [Medline].

  77. Larsen GL, Williams SD. Postneonatal circumcision: population profile. Pediatrics. 1990 May. 85(5):808-12. [Medline].

  78. Lowry TP. Neurophysiological aspects of amyl nitrite. J Psychedelic Drugs. 1980 Jan-Mar. 12(1):73-4. [Medline].

  79. MacKinlay GA. Save the prepuce. Painless separation of preputial adhesions in the outpatient clinic. BMJ. 1988 Sep 3. 297(6648):590-1. [Medline].

  80. Metcalfe PD, Rink RC. The concealed penis: management and outcomes. Curr Opin Urol. 2005 Jul. 15(4):268-72. [Medline].

  81. Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC. Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncol. 2004 Apr. 5(4):240-7. [Medline].

  82. Ochsner MG. Acute urinary retention. Compr Ther. 1986 Dec. 12(12):26-31. [Medline].

  83. Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. Arch Dis Child. 1968 Apr. 43(228):200-3. [Medline].

  84. Pearce I, Payne SR. Do men having routine circumcision need histological confirmation of the cause of their phimosis or postoperative follow-up?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Sep. 84(5):325-7. [Medline].

  85. Poland RL. The question of routine neonatal circumcision. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 3. 322(18):1312-5. [Medline].

  86. Radhakrishnan J, Razzaq A, Manickam K. Concealed penis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002 Dec. 18(8):668-72. [Medline].

  87. Rickwood AM. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int. 1999 Jan. 83 Suppl 1:45-51. [Medline].

  88. Rizvi SA, Naqvi SA, Hussain M, Hasan AS. Religious circumcision: a Muslim view. BJU Int. 1999 Jan. 83 Suppl 1:13-6. [Medline].

  89. Ross JH. Circumcision: Pro and con. Pediatric Urology for the General Urologist. New York, NY: Igaku-Shoin; 1996. 49.

  90. Ryan CA, Finer NN. Changing attitudes and practices regarding local analgesia for newborn circumcision. Pediatrics. 1994 Aug. 94(2 Pt 1):230-3. [Medline].

  91. Senkul T, IserI C, sen B, KarademIr K, Saraçoglu F, Erden D. Circumcision in adults: effect on sexual function. Urology. 2004 Jan. 63(1):155-8. [Medline].

  92. Shenoy MU, Srinivasan J, Sully L, Rance CH. Buried penis: surgical correction using liposuction and realignment of skin. BJU Int. 2000 Sep. 86(4):527-30. [Medline].

  93. Thomas JA, Small CS. Carcinoma of the penis in Southern India. J Urol. 1968 Oct. 100(4):520-6. [Medline].

  94. Thompson HC, King LR, Knox E. Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. 1975 Oct. 56(4):610-1. [Medline].

  95. Wiswell TE, Miller GM, Gelston HM Jr, et al. Effect of circumcision status on periurethral bacterial flora during the first year of life. J Pediatr. 1988 Sep. 113(3):442-6. [Medline].

  96. Wiswell TE, Tencer HL, Welch CA, et al. Circumcision in children beyond the neonatal period. Pediatrics. 1993 Dec. 92(6):791-3. [Medline].

  97. Zampieri N, Corroppolo M, Camoglio FS, Giacomello L, Ottolenghi A. Phimosis: stretching methods with or without application of topical steroids?. J Pediatr. 2005 Nov. 147(5):705-6. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Phimotic foreskin. The distal foreskin is edematous, with cracked fissures. The patient was unable to retract the foreskin.
Dorsal-slit technique. The redundant foreskin is clamped at the 12-o'clock position for 2 minutes for hemostasis.
In the dorsal-slit technique, the clamped foreskin is incised sharply between the 2 hemostats.
The dorsal slit is being completed, and the circumscribing incision (proximal skirt) has been made.
Dorsal-slit technique. Redundant foreskin has been excised. The distal circumcision incision is 1 cm from the coronal sulcus.
Dorsal-slit technique. Proximal and distal skirts are approximated circumferentially with absorbable sutures in an interrupted fashion.
In the sleeve technique, the circumcision is started by making a circumscribing proximal incision. The incision is carried down to the Buck fascia.
In the sleeve technique, a distal incision is made 1 cm proximal to the coronal sulcus.
Sleeve technique. Redundant foreskin is clamped at the 12-o'clock position with 2 straight hemostats. Next, the foreskin is incised between the 2 hemostats.
Sleeve technique. The excess foreskin is peeled off. The shaft of the penis is displaced downward using a stack of sponges as the redundant foreskin is removed.
Sleeve technique. Excess foreskin has been removed completely.
Sleeve technique. The edges of the penile skin are approximated with absorbable sutures.
Sleeve technique. The circumcision is completed with excellent cosmetic result.
The arterial blood supply of the penis arises from the internal pudendal artery. The internal pudendal artery gives off branches to the bulbar artery, cavernosal artery, and dorsal penile artery. The bulbar artery continues on as the bulbourethral artery to supply the urethra. The cavernosal artery gives rise to the helicine arteries that are end arteries. The dorsal artery of the penis gives branches off to the circumflex arteries.
Dorsal view of the arterial and venous blood supply of the penis.
Cross-section through the body of the penis.
Preoperative photo of a buried penis in an adult.
Same patient after penile reconstruction and removal of the pannus. Note the elliptical incision and marked improvement in perceived penile length.
Same patient at the conclusion of the procedure. Although not seen in this picture, a Foley catheter may be left in place after the operation.
Concealed penis secondary to a scrotal web.
Repair in this patient involved releasing the scrotal web and degloving the penis. This patient was found to have deficient penile skin for reconstruction.
Same patient after application of a split-thickness skin graft that was harvested from the left thigh.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.