Phimosis, Adult Circumcision, and Buried Penis Treatment & Management

  • Author: Ryan P Terlecki, MD; Chief Editor: Edward David Kim, MD, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Aug 15, 2011
 

Medical Therapy

Phimosis

Applications of steroid creams (0.05% betamethasone) have been used to manage phimosis medically.[29] The usual regimen is application of the steroid cream once or twice daily for 4-6 weeks. Studies have shown a success rate of 87% with this treatment. Higher rates of success have been reported with concomitant preputial stretching exercises.

If a patient has concomitant balanitis or balanoposthitis, depending on the etiology, he may be treated with topical antibiotics or antifungals. Patients with diabetes mellitus should be advised on proper serum glucose control.

Buried penis

Buried penis cannot be treated medically. The separate entity of trapped penis following neonatal circumcision has been successfully treated with topical betamethasone and manual retraction.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Phimosis

In the United States, circumcision is the surgical treatment of choice for correction of phimosis. In European countries, however, preputioplasty is often used. Although these techniques are outside the scope of this discussion, patients should be aware that these prepuce-preserving methods exist.

Adult circumcision can be performed under local or regional anesthesia and commonly involves either the dorsal slit or the sleeve technique. In China, however, standardization with a device known as the Shang Ring has proven effective, with a substantial decrease in both operative time and anesthetic requirements.[30] The dorsal slit is often useful in patients with phimosis, and the sleeve technique may allow for better hemostasis in patients with large subcutaneous veins.

A properly performed circumcision eliminates phimosis, as well as the risks of paraphimosis and frenular tears or bleeding associated with sexual intercourse.

Buried penis

Numerous techniques have been described for repairing the buried penis. Variations have been proposed for different presumed etiologies and to simplify the procedure. Recurrence and the need for subsequent procedures are possibilities. While the challenge of repair may seem daunting for most general urologists, reconstructive experts have reported unanimous success of a lasting nature.[31]

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Obtaining proper informed consent before the procedure is critical. In particular, inform patients of potential risks, which include bleeding, hematoma formation, infection, suture disruption, inadvertent injury to the urethra or glans, removal of too much or too little skin, and a change of sensation during intercourse. With regard to surgery for the buried penis, patients should be aware of a 1-15% chance of recurrence (secondary concealment) that may necessitate reoperation.

Patients undergoing circumcision for recurrent balanitis should be free from infection before the procedure.

Circumcision may be performed in the office under a local anesthetic or in the operating room under a regional or general anesthetic. For the anxious patient undergoing an office-based procedure, which is rarely the case, diazepam (Valium), 2-5 mg administered orally 1 hour before the procedure, is often effective.

Diazepam (Valium) is a benzodiazepine derivative anxiolytic used for the treatment of anxiety disorders or for short-term relief of anxiety (ie, circumcision, vasectomy). Adult dosing is 2-10 mg PO bid/qid. In children < 6 months, diazepam is not recommended; in those >6 months, dosing is 1-2.5 mg tid/qid. Diazepam is a pregnancy category D drug.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Surgical repair for phimosis

With the patient in a supine position, the genital area is prepared with povidone-iodine solution. Shaving or clipping of the pubic hair is usually unnecessary.

A general anesthetic is recommended in children. A local anesthetic may be used in adults. Local anesthesia is accomplished by administering a dorsal penile nerve block followed by a ring block.

A mixture of equal volumes of 0.5% bupivacaine (Marcaine) and 1-2% lidocaine (Xylocaine) without epinephrine is common. A potential complication of epinephrine use is local tissue ischemia. The maximum recommended dose of lidocaine without epinephrine is 4.5 mg/kg, or 315 mg in a 70-kg male.

Dorsal slit circumcision

To perform the dorsal slit circumcision, clamp the foreskin at the 12-o'clock position with 2 straight hemostats to limit bleeding. See image below.

Dorsal-slit technique. The redundant foreskin is cDorsal-slit technique. The redundant foreskin is clamped at the 12-o'clock position for 2 minutes for hemostasis.

Sharply incise the tissues between the 2 clamps perpendicular to the corona. Make the proximal circumscribing incision. See images below.

In the dorsal-slit technique, the clamped foreskinIn the dorsal-slit technique, the clamped foreskin is incised sharply between the 2 hemostats. The dorsal slit is being completed, and the circumThe dorsal slit is being completed, and the circumscribing incision (proximal skirt) has been made.

Excise the foreskin at its base (approximately 1 cm proximal to the coronal sulcus) with scissors to produce a cosmetically attractive circumcised penis. The amount of skin left below the coronal sulcus should be no more than 1 cm long to prevent edema, adhesions, and, occasionally, paraphimosis. See image below.

Dorsal-slit technique. Redundant foreskin has beenDorsal-slit technique. Redundant foreskin has been excised. The distal circumcision incision is 1 cm from the coronal sulcus.

Ligate superficial veins and obtain hemostasis with electrocautery.

Circumferentially approximate the proximal and distal edges of the foreskin with 4.0-5.0 absorbable sutures (children) or 3.0-4.0 absorbable sutures (adults) in an interrupted fashion. See image below.

Dorsal-slit technique. Proximal and distal skirts Dorsal-slit technique. Proximal and distal skirts are approximated circumferentially with absorbable sutures in an interrupted fashion.

During the circumcision, the use of a thin tapered (noncutting) needle is recommended because it is less traumatic to the tissues and causes less bleeding.

Bacitracin ointment is used to lubricate the suture material (eg, chromic) to facilitate passage of the suture through the delicate skin tissues. This is especially helpful in the pediatric population. Alternatively, mineral oil may be used as a lubricant.

Sleeve technique

The sleeve technique is an attractive alternative for circumcision.

After proper anesthesia has been achieved, mark the redundant foreskin with a marker.

Before making the initial incision, take care to measure out the correct amount of foreskin to be removed. This is accomplished by gently stretching out the penis with an index finger applied to the penoscrotal junction and noting the indentation of the coronal sulcus through the penile skin.

Outline the coronal sulcus with a marker. This is the proximal skirt of the circumscribing incision. The distal skirt of the circumscribing incision is approximately 1 cm proximal to the corona. When this is properly performed, a sleeve of foreskin is present between the 2 incisions, and the remaining penile skin does not remain too short or too long. See images below.

In the sleeve technique, the circumcision is startIn the sleeve technique, the circumcision is started by making a circumscribing proximal incision. The incision is carried down to the Buck fascia. In the sleeve technique, a distal incision is madeIn the sleeve technique, a distal incision is made 1 cm proximal to the coronal sulcus.

Clamp the redundant foreskin between the circumcision incisions at the 12-o'clock position and incise it. See image below.

Sleeve technique. Redundant foreskin is clamped atSleeve technique. Redundant foreskin is clamped at the 12-o'clock position with 2 straight hemostats. Next, the foreskin is incised between the 2 hemostats.

Remove the sleeve by using electrocautery. See image below.

Sleeve technique. The excess foreskin is peeled ofSleeve technique. The excess foreskin is peeled off. The shaft of the penis is displaced downward using a stack of sponges as the redundant foreskin is removed.

Obtain hemostasis with cautery and ligatures. If circumcision has been performed properly, the proximal and distal skirts should approximate well without tension. See image below.

Sleeve technique. Excess foreskin has been removedSleeve technique. Excess foreskin has been removed completely.

Once hemostasis has been achieved, circumferentially approximate the edges of the foreskin with 3.0-5.0 absorbable sutures in either a running 4-quadrant closure or an interrupted fashion. Admittedly, while a sutured closure is most commonly used, 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA; Dermabond, Ethicon) represents an alternative.[32] Correct technique allows for proper cosmesis. See images below.

Sleeve technique. The edges of the penile skin areSleeve technique. The edges of the penile skin are approximated with absorbable sutures. Sleeve technique. The circumcision is completed wiSleeve technique. The circumcision is completed with excellent cosmetic result.

Surgical techniques for buried penis

In pediatric cases, sources have described the essential nature of dividing dysgenetic dartos bands and fixation of the dartos fascia to the Buck fascia dorsally in the midline, ventrally over the corpus spongiosum, and proximally along the penile shaft. Care must be taken to avoid injury to either the urethra or the neurovascular bundles.

Defatting of the mons pubis is an essential step in buried penis repair in adult patients, but opinions vary as to the value of its removal in children. This can be achieved by excisional lipectomy, liposuction, or a combination thereof.[33] The same controversy exists regarding whether or not to take down the suspensory ligament. In the authors’ experience, this is rarely necessary and may lead to instability of the erection.

In 2004, Frenkl et al described a simple technique for the repair of buried penis in children, as follows:[34]

  • First, a traction suture is placed in the glans, and local anesthetic is instilled along the subcoronal circumference.
  • A circumcision incision is then used, and, using the Buck fascia as the dissection plane, the penis is degloved to the penopubic junction.
  • As the next step in the operation, numerous authors describe sharp dissection of dysgenetic dartos fibers.
  • Fixation is then performed between the Buck fascia and the dermis at the base of the penile shaft with 5-0 sutures at the 3- and 9-o'clock positions.
  • The circumferential incision is then reapproximated at its origin with interrupted absorbable suture.

Cromie et al (1998) applied a similar technique in adults for correction of buried penis that involved making a circumferential incision of the inner preputial skin layer proximal to the corona, unfurling the incised skin from the penile shaft, and leaving a coronal collar of approximately 1 cm.[35]

Brisson et al (2001) add a longitudinal incision on the penile shaft ventrally, along the median raphe. They utilize this exposure to allow for additional points of fixation between the skin and the tunica albuginea.[36]

In 1998, Donatucci and Ritter reported their technique for correction of buried penis in adults as follows:[37]

  • If a pannus is to be resected, the amount to be removed is estimated with consideration of avoiding undue tension upon closure. Both liposuction and panniculectomy have been used in these operations. Generally, if excess skin with poor tone is present, panniculectomy should be performed instead of liposuction.
  • Resection is done in an elliptical fashion down to the mons pubis, which is mobilized to the base of the penis. The mons pubis is then resuspended with sutures between the superficial fascia at the penile base and the deep fascia of the abdominal wall. The wound is closed over a drain with gentle pressure over the pubic area.
  • A traction suture is placed in the glans to facilitate dissection, and a Foley catheter is used to protect the urethra. The scar contracture is released, and the penis is degloved to the base along the Buck fascia, with preservation of neurovascular bundles. Adhesions are separated as they are encountered, and chordee is corrected.
  • Artificial erection is used to confirm chordee correction and to determine tissue needs for optimal construction. This maneuver is performed using a Penrose drain as a tourniquet at the penile base and injecting 50-100 mL of sterile saline into the corpora cavernosa with a 21-gauge butterfly catheter. If adequate length is not obtained, the suspensory ligament is divided and resuspended from the symphysis pubis with 1-0 silk sutures with the penis in traction.
  • If a patient has a minimal deficiency of longitudinal penile skin, a plasty rearrangement of this skin can often be accomplished. If a severe deficiency of skin is appreciated, a split-thickness skin graft may be used, either from a panniculectomy specimen (if available) or from the lateral thigh.[38] (Other authors, such as Chopra et al [2002], feel that a full-thickness skin graft is more appropriate.[39] ) Once fixation between the skin, dartos, and tunica albuginea at the base of the penis has been performed, as described above, skin grafts are applied in spiral fashion. If the wound bed is inadequate for grafting because of scarring, the use of flaps may be considered.
  • A penile block at the conclusion of the procedure may provide better postoperative pain control.

A more recent description has described a W-shaped excision that may allow for minimal dog-ear deformity.[40]

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Adult circumcision

Following adult circumcision, many urologists choose not to use a dressing. However, either petroleum jelly and sterile gauze or Xeroform petrolatum gauze may be wrapped around the penis circumferentially, followed by application of sterile gauze and a nonadhesive elastic wrap.

In adults who have undergone circumcision, discharge medications should include oral narcotics. The dressing is removed 24-48 hours after surgery. The patient should wear loose-fitting briefs after surgery, and he may shower but should wash gently around the incision site.

Full recovery may require 4-6 weeks of complete sexual abstinence.

Buried-penis surgery

Following surgery for buried penis with skin grafting, the authors’ preference is to use a vacuum-assisted closure, negative-pressure dressing in addition to an indwelling Foley catheter. Pressure of 75 mm Hg is maintained for 5 days, with the patient on bed rest. Upon removal, the patient is discharged with a regimen of petroleum gauze dressing changes.

In patients who have undergone panniculectomy, a pressure garment may be worn over the surgical site for 4-6 weeks. In patients who have undergone liposuction, a pressure dressing is left in place for 7 days.

Children have few restrictions after surgical correction of the buried penis. Adults, however, must refrain from strenuous activity, heavy lifting, and sexual activity for 6 weeks after operation. Despite avoidance of sexual activity, erections are encouraged to avoid subsequent restriction by graft contraction.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Routine follow-up after adult circumcision is advisable, but not mandatory. Patients may be seen 2-3 weeks after the operation so that the incision can be examined to see if it has appropriately healed. Following buried-penis repair, both pediatric and adult patients may be seen at 2 and 6 weeks after surgery.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Men's Health Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Foreskin Problems and Circumcision.

Previous
Next

Complications

Circumcision

Circumcision is a safe surgical procedure that is well tolerated in nearly all patients. However, as with any surgical procedure, complications are possible. Examples include bleeding, infection, hematoma, swelling/lymphedema, pain, and poor cosmesis. Certainly, given the risk of adverse events, circumcision should be performed only by competent medical professionals, as cases of self-circumcision by members of the general public have produced tragic outcomes.[41]

Postoperative bleeding is the most common complication. It usually occurs when a scab is pulled off as the dressing is being removed. However, sutures can also be torn by erections before healing is completed. Bleeding can often be controlled with direct pressure. Rarely, electrocautery or ligature is required.

Infection after circumcision is uncommon and, if encountered, may be treated with local or oral antibiotics.

Urethral injury is extremely rare. A urethral injury that can result from circumcision is a subcoronal urethrocutaneous fistula. This condition necessitates surgical correction.

Suture sinus tracts can occur if a simple suture becomes epithelialized before suture absorption. These frequently go unnoticed and are likely inconsequential.

Postoperative adhesions may lead to formation of skin bridges between the circumcision incision and the glans. These adhesions are typically on the dorsal surface and therefore may present an obstacle to proper hygiene.

The most devastating complication associated with circumcision is amputation of the penile shaft. A recent report detailed repair of such complications by corporal advancement with accompanying fat flap interposition and skin grafting.[42] It is also possible to inadvertently remove an excessive amount of foreskin, requiring either grafting or a flap reconstruction. Another postcircumcision complication, although rare, is keloid formation. While topical application of steroids has been used, surgical excision remains the standard modality of treatment.[43]

A study by Fink et al (2002) examined the sexual effects of adult circumcision.[44] They found that circumcision in the adult appears to result in worsened erectile function and decreased penile sensitivity. However, sexual activity did not change, and satisfaction was actually improved. Given that 93% of the patients in that study underwent surgery for pathology, circumcision may have alleviated enough sexual apprehension to allow unmasking of previously unidentified erectile dysfunction. Although many investigators feel that circumcision reduces penile sensitivity, an increase in ejaculatory latency time may, in some cases, be considered an advantage.

Some have speculated that the mucosal cuff length following circumcision may be associated with premature ejaculation. However, an evaluation of 84 men found no association between these entities and concluded that circumcision has no deleterious effect on sexual function.[45] Furthermore, recent reports of a direct comparison between circumcised and uncircumcised men found no difference in genital sensitivity.[46]

In evaluating the effect of circumcision on a woman's sexual enjoyment, O'Hara et al (1999) reported that the women surveyed preferred intercourse with uncircumcised men.[47] The authors suggest that coitus with a circumcised partner reduces vaginal secretions and decreases continual clitoral stimulation. However, a number of the women surveyed were recruited via the newsletter of an anticircumcision organization.

Buried penis

Correction of the buried penis is a simple and effective procedure with few recurrences or complications. Two series that reported on the long-term outcome of pediatric cases found that the correction resulted in excellent long-term cosmetic results. Higher success rates were found in patients who had the correction as toddlers than in those who had the correction as adolescents. Herndon et al (2003) found that most parents felt that the surgery eliminated associated negative feelings and that it enhanced penile appearance and facilitated better hygiene.[48]

Most of the complications reported after surgery for buried-penis correction are temporary. Reported rates of recurrent retraction, however, range from 1-15% and often require additional surgery. Observation is a viable option for mild cases. Ventral edema has been reported in 1-11% of cases and usually resolves spontaneously. Dissatisfaction with cosmesis is possible, but the physician should preoperatively assess for unrealistic expectations. Postoperative sexual dysfunction has been reported, but conditions predisposing to buried penis often carry a higher likelihood of erectile dysfunction.

Studies in an animal model show that buried penis may induce microscopic changes related to erectile dysfunction, including decreased activity of nitric oxide synthase and loss of smooth muscle.[49] These changes seem to be directly related to the duration of the condition. Pain upon erection may be seen with suturing of the Buck fascia to the pubic periosteum. Additionally, it needs to be recognized that the area of the skin graft will be insensate.

Patients who have undergone penile reconstruction may present with poor graft healing, flap necrosis, or complaints of decreased sensitivity in the grafted area. Patients may also present with persistent redundancy of the penile skin or reaccumulation of the abdominal fat pad.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Phimosis

Phimosis does not recur after proper circumcision. If too much penile skin is left, a repeat circumcision may be necessary for medical or cosmetic reasons. In adults, some permanent skin-color discrepancy along the suture line of the circumcision may occur. Overall, careful attention to proper surgical technique will allow for a pleasing cosmetic result.

Reported results of buried-penis repair in pediatric and adult cases have generally been good. Surgery often provides immediate excellent cosmetic results with low rates of complications. Brisson et al (2001) contend that both patients and their parents derive psychological benefits from the procedure.[36] This assertion seems to be confirmed by postoperative surveys. In addition to improved confidence, improvement in personal hygiene and voiding result from buried-penis repair in both pediatric and adult patients. Adult patients often also report improved sexual performance.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ryan P Terlecki, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Ryan P Terlecki, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Urological Association, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Richard A Santucci, MD, FACS  Specialist-in-Chief, Department of Urology, Detroit Medical Center; Chief of Urology, Detroit Receiving Hospital; Director, The Center for Urologic Reconstruction; Clinical Professor of Urology, Michigan State University College of Medicine

Richard A Santucci, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, and Société Internationale d'Urologie (International Society of Urology)

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Leonard Gabriel Gomella, MD, FACS  The Bernard W Godwin Professor of Prostate Cancer Chairman, Department of Urology, Associate Director of Clinical Affairs, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Leonard Gabriel Gomella, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Urological Association, Sigma Xi, Society for Basic Urologic Research, Society of University Urologists, and Society of Urologic Oncology

Disclosure: GSK Consulting fee Consulting; Astra Zeneca Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Watson Pharmaceuticals Consulting fee Consulting

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS  The David A Bloom Professor of Urology, Director, Division of Endourology and Stone Disease, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School

J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Catholic Medical Association, Endourological Society, Society for Urology and Engineering, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, and Society of Urologic Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS  Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, University of Tennessee Medical Center

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association, Sexual Medicine Society of North America, and Tennessee Medical Association

Disclosure: Lilly Consulting fee Advisor; Astellas Consulting fee Speaking and teaching; Watson Consulting fee Speaking and teaching; Allergan Consulting fee Speaking and teaching

Acknowledgments

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Jong M. Choe, MD, FACS, and previous coauthor Hye Kim, RPh, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J. Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol. Jul 1986;136(1 Pt 2):268-71. [Medline].

  2. Van Howe RS. Does circumcision influence sexually transmitted diseases?: a literature review. BJU Int. Jan 1999;83 Suppl 1:52-62. [Medline].

  3. Hernandez BY, Wilkens LR, Zhu X, McDuffie K, Thompson P, Shvetsov YB, et al. Circumcision and human papillomavirus infection in men: a site-specific comparison. J Infect Dis. Mar 15 2008;197(6):787-94. [Medline].

  4. Morris BJ, Waskett J, Bailis SA. Case number and the financial impact of circumcision in reducing prostate cancer. BJU Int. Jul 2007;100(1):5-6. [Medline].

  5. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. Nov 2005;2(11):e298. [Medline].

  6. [Best Evidence] Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Feb 24 2007;369(9562):643-56. [Medline].

  7. [Best Evidence] Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. Feb 24 2007;369(9562):657-66. [Medline].

  8. Mills E, Cooper C, Anema A, Guyatt G. Male circumcision for the prevention of heterosexually acquired HIV infection: a meta-analysis of randomized trials involving 11,050 men. HIV Med. Jul 2008;9(6):332-5. [Medline].

  9. Londish GJ, Murray JM. Significant reduction in HIV prevalence according to male circumcision intervention in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Epidemiol. Mar 3 2008;[Medline].

  10. McKinney CM, Klingler EJ, Paneth-Pollak R, Schillinger JA, Gwynn RC, Frieden TR. Prevalence of adult male circumcision in the general population and a population at increased risk for HIV/AIDS in New York City. Sex Transm Dis. Sep 2008;35(9):814-7. [Medline].

  11. Pask AJ, McInnes KJ, Webb DR, Short RV. Topical oestrogen keratinises the human foreskin and may help prevent HIV infection. PLoS ONE. Jun 4 2008;3(6):e2308. [Medline].

  12. Tobian AA, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Kigozi G, Gravitt PE, Laeyendecker O, et al. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. N Engl J Med. Mar 26 2009;360(13):1298-309. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  13. Mahanta J, Borkakoty B, Biswas D, Walia K. Circumcision and herpes simplex virus-2 infection among spouses. Sex Transm Infect. Dec 2010;86(7):487. [Medline].

  14. Kigozi G, Lukabwe I, Kagaayi J, Wawer MJ, Nantume B, Kigozi G, et al. Sexual satisfaction of women partners of circumcised men in a randomized trial of male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. BJU Int. Dec 2009;104(11):1698-701. [Medline].

  15. Edmonds EV, Hunt S, Hawkins D, Dinneen M, Francis N, Bunker CB. Clinical parameters in male genital lichen sclerosus: a case series of 329 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. Jun 27 2011;[Medline].

  16. Namavar MR, Robati B. Removal of foreskin remnants in circumcised adults for treatment of premature ejaculation. Urol Ann. May 2011;3(2):87-92. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  17. Shermak MA, Chang D, Magnuson TH, Schweitzer MA. An outcomes analysis of patients undergoing body contouring surgery after massive weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2006;118(4):1026-31. [Medline].

  18. Pestana IA, Greenfield JM, Walsh M, Donatucci CF, Erdmann D. Management of "buried" penis in adulthood: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 2009;124(4):1186-95. [Medline].

  19. Herndon CD, McKenna PH, Kolon TF, Gonzales ET, Baker LA, Docimo SG. A multicenter outcomes analysis of patients with neonatal reflux presenting with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. Sep 1999;162(3 Pt 2):1203-8. [Medline].

  20. Schoen EJ, Oehrli M, Colby Cd, Machin G. The highly protective effect of newborn circumcision against invasive penile cancer. Pediatrics. Mar 2000;105(3):E36. [Medline].

  21. Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, Schwartz SM, Shera KA, Wurscher MA. Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease. Int J Cancer. Sep 10 2005;116(4):606-16. [Medline].

  22. Meuli M, Briner J, Hanimann B, Sacher P. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus causing phimosis in boys: a prospective study with 5-year followup after complete circumcision. J Urol. Sep 1994;152(3):987-9. [Medline].

  23. Burkholder GV, Newell ME. New surgical treatment for micropenis. J Urol. Apr 1983;129(4):832-4. [Medline].

  24. Kiss A, Király L, Kutasy B, Merksz M. High incidence of balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys with phimosis: prospective 10-year study. Pediatr Dermatol. Jul-Aug 2005;22(4):305-8. [Medline].

  25. Orsola A, Caffaratti J, Garat JM. Conservative treatment of phimosis in children using a topical steroid. Urology. Aug 1 2000;56(2):307-10. [Medline].

  26. Monsour MA, Rabinovitch HH, Dean GE. Medical management of phimosis in children: our experience with topical steroids. J Urol. Sep 1999;162(3 Pt 2):1162-4. [Medline].

  27. Dessanti A, Ginesu G, Iannuccelli M, Balata A. Phimosis. Preputial plasty using transversal widening on the dorsal side with EMLA local anesthetic cream. J Pediatr Surg. Apr 2005;40(4):713-5. [Medline].

  28. Chu CC, Chen KC, Diau GY. Topical steroid treatment of phimosis in boys. J Urol. Sep 1999;162(3 Pt 1):861-3. [Medline].

  29. Palmer JS, Elder JS, Palmer LS. The use of betamethasone to manage the trapped penis following neonatal circumcision. J Urol. Oct 2005;174(4 Pt 2):1577-8. [Medline].

  30. Peng Y, Masson P, Li PS, Chang Y, Tian L, Lee R, et al. No-needle local anesthesia for adult male circumcision. J Urol. Sep 2010;184(3):978-83. [Medline].

  31. Tang SH, Kamat D, Santucci RA. Modern management of adult-acquired buried penis. Urology. Jul 2008;72(1):124-7. [Medline].

  32. Elmore JM, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ. Sutureless circumcision using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond): appraisal after 18-month experience. Urology. Oct 2007;70(4):803-6. [Medline].

  33. Warren AG, Peled ZM, Borud LJ. Surgical correction of a buried penis focusing on the mons as an anatomic unit. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Mar 2009;62(3):388-92. [Medline].

  34. Frenkl TL, Agarwal S, Caldamone AA. Results of a simplified technique for buried penis repair. J Urol. Feb 2004;171(2 Pt 1):826-8. [Medline].

  35. Cromie WJ, Ritchey ML, Smith RC, Zagaja GP. Anatomical alignment for the correction of buried penis. J Urol. Oct 1998;160(4):1482-4. [Medline].

  36. Brisson P, Patel H, Chan M, Feins N. Penoplasty for buried penis in children: report of 50 cases. J Pediatr Surg. Mar 2001;36(3):421-5. [Medline].

  37. Donatucci CF, Ritter EF. Management of the buried penis in adults. J Urol. Feb 1998;159(2):420-4. [Medline].

  38. Gillett MD, Rathbun SR, Husmann DA, Clay RP, Kramer SA. Split-thickness skin graft for the management of concealed penis. J Urol. Feb 2005;173(2):579-82. [Medline].

  39. Chopra CW, Ayoub NT, Bromfield C, Witt PD. Surgical management of acquired (cicatricial) buried penis in an adult patient. Ann Plast Surg. Nov 2002;49(5):545-9. [Medline].

  40. Blanton MW, Pestana IA, Donatucci CF, Erdmann D. A unique abdominoplasty approach in management of "buried" penis in adulthood. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 2010;125(5):1579-80. [Medline].

  41. Natali A, Rossetti MA. Complications of self-circumcision: a case report and proposal. J Sex Med. Dec 2008;5(12):2970-2. [Medline].

  42. Shaeer O. Restoration of the penis following amputation at circumcision: Shaeer's A-Y plasty. J Sex Med. Apr 2008;5(4):1013-21. [Medline].

  43. Isken T, Sen C, Isil E, Iscen D, Sozubir S, Gürbüz Y. A very rare complication: keloid formation after circumcision, and its treatment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Nov 2008;61(11):1405-7. [Medline].

  44. Fink KS, Carson CC, DeVellis RF. Adult circumcision outcomes study: effect on erectile function, penile sensitivity, sexual activity and satisfaction. J Urol. May 2002;167(5):2113-6. [Medline].

  45. Hosseini SR, Khazaeli MH, Atharikia D. Role of postcircumcision mucosal cuff length in lifelong premature ejaculation: a pilot study. J Sex Med. Jan 2008;5(1):206-9. [Medline].

  46. Payne K, Thaler L, Kukkonen T, Carrier S, Binik Y. Sensation and sexual arousal in circumcised and uncircumcised men. J Sex Med. May 2007;4(3):667-74. [Medline].

  47. O'Hara K, O'Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner. BJU Int. Jan 1999;83 Suppl 1:79-84. [Medline].

  48. Herndon CD, Casale AJ, Cain MP, Rink RC. Long-term outcome of the surgical treatment of concealed penis. J Urol. Oct 2003;170(4 Pt 2):1695-7; discussion 1697. [Medline].

  49. Cheng F, Yu WM, Xia Y, Zhang XB, Yang SX, Ge MH. Effects of buried penis on the structure and function of corpus cavernosum in a rat model. Chin Med J (Engl). Jul 2010;123(13):1736-40. [Medline].

  50. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J Urol. Jul 1994;152(1):4-14. [Medline].

  51. Adham MN, Teimourian B, Mosca P. Buried penis release in adults with suction lipectomy and abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 2000;106(4):840-4. [Medline].

  52. Ahmed A, Mbibi NH, Dawam D, Kalayi GD. Complications of traditional male circumcision. Ann Trop Paediatr. Mar 1999;19(1):113-7. [Medline].

  53. Alter GJ, Ehrlich RM. A new technique for correction of the hidden penis in children and adults. J Urol. Feb 1999;161(2):455-9. [Medline].

  54. American Academy of Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics. Aug 1989;84(2):388-91. [Medline].

  55. Babu R, Harrison SK, Hutton KA. Ballooning of the foreskin and physiological phimosis: is there any objective evidence of obstructed voiding?. BJU Int. Aug 2004;94(3):384-7. [Medline].

  56. Baskin LS, Canning DA, Snyder HM 3rd, Duckett JW Jr. Surgical repair of urethral circumcision injuries. J Urol. Dec 1997;158(6):2269-71. [Medline].

  57. Burnakis TG. Amyl nitrite for the treatment of penile tumescence. Hosp Pharm. 1991;26:343.

  58. Chuang JH, Chen LY, Shieh CS, Lee SY. Surgical correction of buried penis: a review of 60 cases. J Pediatr Surg. Mar 2001;36(3):426-9. [Medline].

  59. Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int. Jan 1999;83 Suppl 1:34-44. [Medline].

  60. Craig JC, Knight JF, Sureshkumar P, et al. Effect of circumcision on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boys. J Pediatr. Jan 1996;128(1):23-7. [Medline].

  61. Devine. Concealed and webbed penis. In: Hinman F, ed. Atlas of Pediatric Urologic Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders and Co; 1998:606-9.

  62. Dunsmuir WD, Gordon EM. The history of circumcision. BJU Int. Jan 1999;83 Suppl 1:1-12. [Medline].

  63. Fussell EN, Kaack MB, Cherry R, Roberts JA. Adherence of bacteria to human foreskins. J Urol. Nov 1988;140(5):997-1001. [Medline].

  64. Ginsburg CM, McCracken GH Jr. Urinary tract infections in young infants. Pediatrics. Apr 1982;69(4):409-12. [Medline].

  65. Glass JM. Religious circumcision: a Jewish view. BJU Int. Jan 1999;83 Suppl 1:17-21. [Medline].

  66. Gursel EO, Georgountzos C, Uson AC, et al. Penile cancer. Urology. Jun 1973;1(6):569-78. [Medline].

  67. Hollowood AD, Sibley GN. Non-painful paraphimosis causing partial amputation. Br J Urol. Dec 1997;80(6):958. [Medline].

  68. Holman JR, Stuessi KA. Adult circumcision. Am Fam Physician. Mar 15 1999;59(6):1514-8. [Medline].

  69. Hunter RH. Notes on the Development of the Prepuce. J Anat. Oct 1935;70(Pt 1):68-75. [Medline].

  70. Hutcheson JC. Male neonatal circumcision: indications, controversies and complications. Urol Clin North Am. Aug 2004;31(3):461-7, viii. [Medline].

  71. Johnson DE, Fuerst DE, Ayala AG. Carcinoma of the penis. Experience with 153 cases. Urology. May 1973;1(5):404-8. [Medline].

  72. Koudelka J, Docekalova S. [A ventral slit of the prepuce in phimosis]. Rozhl Chir. Sep 1998;77(9):402-4. [Medline].

  73. Larsen GL, Williams SD. Postneonatal circumcision: population profile. Pediatrics. May 1990;85(5):808-12. [Medline].

  74. Lowry TP. Neurophysiological aspects of amyl nitrite. J Psychedelic Drugs. Jan-Mar 1980;12(1):73-4. [Medline].

  75. MacKinlay GA. Save the prepuce. Painless separation of preputial adhesions in the outpatient clinic. BMJ. Sep 3 1988;297(6648):590-1. [Medline].

  76. Metcalfe PD, Rink RC. The concealed penis: management and outcomes. Curr Opin Urol. Jul 2005;15(4):268-72. [Medline].

  77. Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC. Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncol. Apr 2004;5(4):240-7. [Medline].

  78. Ochsner MG. Acute urinary retention. Compr Ther. Dec 1986;12(12):26-31. [Medline].

  79. Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. Arch Dis Child. Apr 1968;43(228):200-3. [Medline].

  80. Pearce I, Payne SR. Do men having routine circumcision need histological confirmation of the cause of their phimosis or postoperative follow-up?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. Sep 2002;84(5):325-7. [Medline].

  81. Poland RL. The question of routine neonatal circumcision. N Engl J Med. May 3 1990;322(18):1312-5. [Medline].

  82. Radhakrishnan J, Razzaq A, Manickam K. Concealed penis. Pediatr Surg Int. Dec 2002;18(8):668-72. [Medline].

  83. Rickwood AM. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int. Jan 1999;83 Suppl 1:45-51. [Medline].

  84. Rizvi SA, Naqvi SA, Hussain M, Hasan AS. Religious circumcision: a Muslim view. BJU Int. Jan 1999;83 Suppl 1:13-6. [Medline].

  85. Ross JH. Circumcision: Pro and con. In: Pediatric Urology for the General Urologist. New York, NY: Igaku-Shoin; 1996:49.

  86. Ryan CA, Finer NN. Changing attitudes and practices regarding local analgesia for newborn circumcision. Pediatrics. Aug 1994;94(2 Pt 1):230-3. [Medline].

  87. Senkul T, IserI C, sen B, KarademIr K, Saraçoglu F, Erden D. Circumcision in adults: effect on sexual function. Urology. Jan 2004;63(1):155-8. [Medline].

  88. Shenoy MU, Srinivasan J, Sully L, Rance CH. Buried penis: surgical correction using liposuction and realignment of skin. BJU Int. Sep 2000;86(4):527-30. [Medline].

  89. Thomas JA, Small CS. Carcinoma of the penis in Southern India. J Urol. Oct 1968;100(4):520-6. [Medline].

  90. Thompson HC, King LR, Knox E. Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. Oct 1975;56(4):610-1. [Medline].

  91. Wiswell TE, Miller GM, Gelston HM Jr, et al. Effect of circumcision status on periurethral bacterial flora during the first year of life. J Pediatr. Sep 1988;113(3):442-6. [Medline].

  92. Wiswell TE, Tencer HL, Welch CA, et al. Circumcision in children beyond the neonatal period. Pediatrics. Dec 1993;92(6):791-3. [Medline].

  93. Zampieri N, Corroppolo M, Camoglio FS, Giacomello L, Ottolenghi A. Phimosis: stretching methods with or without application of topical steroids?. J Pediatr. Nov 2005;147(5):705-6. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Phimotic foreskin. The distal foreskin is edematous, with cracked fissures. The patient was unable to retract the foreskin.
Dorsal-slit technique. The redundant foreskin is clamped at the 12-o'clock position for 2 minutes for hemostasis.
In the dorsal-slit technique, the clamped foreskin is incised sharply between the 2 hemostats.
The dorsal slit is being completed, and the circumscribing incision (proximal skirt) has been made.
Dorsal-slit technique. Redundant foreskin has been excised. The distal circumcision incision is 1 cm from the coronal sulcus.
Dorsal-slit technique. Proximal and distal skirts are approximated circumferentially with absorbable sutures in an interrupted fashion.
In the sleeve technique, the circumcision is started by making a circumscribing proximal incision. The incision is carried down to the Buck fascia.
In the sleeve technique, a distal incision is made 1 cm proximal to the coronal sulcus.
Sleeve technique. Redundant foreskin is clamped at the 12-o'clock position with 2 straight hemostats. Next, the foreskin is incised between the 2 hemostats.
Sleeve technique. The excess foreskin is peeled off. The shaft of the penis is displaced downward using a stack of sponges as the redundant foreskin is removed.
Sleeve technique. Excess foreskin has been removed completely.
Sleeve technique. The edges of the penile skin are approximated with absorbable sutures.
Sleeve technique. The circumcision is completed with excellent cosmetic result.
The arterial blood supply of the penis arises from the internal pudendal artery. The internal pudendal artery gives off branches to the bulbar artery, cavernosal artery, and dorsal penile artery. The bulbar artery continues on as the bulbourethral artery to supply the urethra. The cavernosal artery gives rise to the helicine arteries that are end arteries. The dorsal artery of the penis gives branches off to the circumflex arteries.
Dorsal view of the arterial and venous blood supply of the penis.
Cross-section through the body of the penis.
Preoperative photo of a buried penis in an adult.
Same patient after penile reconstruction and removal of the pannus. Note the elliptical incision and marked improvement in perceived penile length.
Same patient at the conclusion of the procedure. Although not seen in this picture, a Foley catheter may be left in place after the operation.
Concealed penis secondary to a scrotal web.
Repair in this patient involved releasing the scrotal web and degloving the penis. This patient was found to have deficient penile skin for reconstruction.
Same patient after application of a split-thickness skin graft that was harvested from the left thigh.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.