Updated: Aug 27, 2009
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common disorder in men older than 40 years. BPH usually starts to become symptomatic in men aged 50 years and older. Because of the intimate anatomic relationship between the bladder, urethra, and prostate, prostatic growth can alter the physiology and function of these organs and produce a symptom complex known as prostatism. Almost every man expects to have some type of prostate problem during his lifetime. Although no one knows how to prevent BPH, other than with castration or testosterone production elimination, treatment options are available that can effectively and safely ameliorate its symptoms and preserve normal bladder and kidney function.
Symptoms associated with BPH may include an increase in the frequency of urination, hesitancy in starting the urinary flow, a weaker stream, an increase in nocturia, a sensation of incomplete bladder emptying, and urgency that may be associated with incontinence. These lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) may result from bladder outlet obstruction (BOO)1 or BPH. In addition, they may also be associated with an overactive bladder (OAB) in the absence of obstruction. Differentiating the pathophysiology of LUTS, BOO, and OAB allows for application of the most appropriate therapy.
LUTS may be subdivided into different categories for clinical purposes. LUTS associated with clinical BPH assumes that it is the BPH that is responsible for the symptoms, but this is not always accurate.
When symptoms become troublesome, patients seek medical attention from their primary care physician or urologist. Previously, the only therapies were open surgical procedures (eg, suprapubic prostatectomy, retropubic prostatectomy, perineal prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP]). Now, various therapeutic alternatives are available, including pharmaceuticals, herbal products, or interventional procedures.
Pharmaceutical therapy consists of alpha-adrenergic blockers, 5-alpha-reductase (5aR) inhibitors, various herbal products such as saw palmetto and Pygeum africanum, and a plethora of new procedures, including microwave thermotherapy, prostate vaporization techniques, free-beam laser prostatectomies, thermotherapy with heated water, photodynamic therapy, injection therapy with alcohol, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and interstitial laser coagulation (ILC).
This article focuses primarily on one of the laser therapies, ILC of the prostate, although the other forms of intervention are discussed.
In the 1980s, several investigators began studying the application of interstitial laser energy to treat various neoplasms. The neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser energy was transmitted through flexible end-firing fibers inserted directly into the tumor. This produced a focal area of tissue necrosis surrounding the fiber tip. Small tumors could be effectively eradicated.
In 1991, Hofstetter suggested the use of this technique to treat BPH. Studies in animal and human prostates demonstrated the feasibility of this approach and led to clinical trials for men with symptomatic BPH. The original end-firing Nd:YAG laser fibers emitted a high-energy beam from its tip but produced only a small spherical volume of tissue destruction.
Early fibers were fragile and had a tendency to break during insertion. Recognizing the potential usefulness of this procedure, new fibers were specially designed for treating the prostate. These sturdy fibers were larger in diameter and had pointed tips to facilitate placement into prostatic tissue.
Currently, the fibers have distal-diffusing tips that radiate 360° laser-light energy along the terminal 3 mm of the fiber. During the 90-second or 3-minute laser application time (depending on which model unit is used), ellipsoid volumes of tissue coagulation are created, which surround the axis of the fiber. The affected tissue area has a diameter of 1.5-2 cm and a length of 2 cm, which corresponds to the length of the energy-diffusing fiber tip.
The laser systems, manufactured by Johnson and Johnson (Indigo), in Cincinnati, and Dornier (Fiber Tome), in Germany, are compact, readily transportable, low-power, diode laser devices that use a 15- to 20-watt variable power source. This process produces a wavelength of 800-850 nm. The current indigo system uses an 830-nm fiber, and laser energy transmits through a sterile fiber enclosed within a 2-cm long, high-temperature resistant, light-diffusing tip that fits through a cystoscope. Low-power settings minimize tissue charring, which impedes light and heat conduction and decreases the amount of tissue coagulation.
The transurethral endoscopically guided technique is preferred; however, both transperineal and transrectal approaches are used. Although transrectal ultrasonography was initially used to guide the placement of the fibers, this is rarely necessary. These laser systems (ie, transperineal, transrectal) represent an effective and safe method for relieving BPH-associated symptoms.
Although BPH is one of the most common processes in aging males, much remains to be learned about its etiology and pathophysiology. Until 10 years ago, the prevailing opinion was that the symptoms associated with BPH were due entirely to an increase in urethral resistance caused by an enlarged prostate constricting the urethra; however, since that time, obstruction has been noted to produce neurologic alterations in the bladder and prostate, which account for many of the symptoms.
The following terms describe BPH, but no uniform acceptance of any terminology exists. Regardless of which term is used, the patient seeks the attention of a urologist when symptoms of difficult urination begin.
ILC is one of many minimally invasive procedures that have been introduced to alleviate the problems associated with BPH. At this time, stating that one form of therapy is distinctly advantageous over the others is not possible because few comparative studies have been performed. ILC is applicable for prostates smaller than 60 mL in volume, and this procedure, like the others, can be performed in the office with local anesthesia.
The prostate undergoes significant growth during specific periods (ie, fetal development, puberty, late middle age). At the end of puberty, the prostate size is 15-25 g, and it remains in this range until BPH develops.
Growth of BPH usually begins in men aged 30-35 years. In men aged 30-50 years, the estimated doubling time for prostate weight is 4.5 years. In men aged 50-70 years, the doubling time is 10 years. Researchers postulate that the average age-related growth rate is approximately 6 g per decade.
BPH is the most common tumor that develops in men. Symptoms are thought to develop from the interaction among the following 3 components:
Enlargement of the prostatic adenoma produces changes in the detrusor that are responsible for many of the symptoms that men experience. The smooth muscles that encircle the urethra and course through the prostate are responsible for maintaining muscle tone in the urethra. The dynamic changes in these smooth muscles result in symptoms of frequency, urgency that may be accompanied by urge incontinence, nocturia, and postvoid dribbling. These LUTS tend to occur in men younger than 65 years. Often, these men have prostates that are not very enlarged and have relatively good flow rates and empty their bladders fairly well.
The static or obstructive symptoms, which usually occur in older men, include a weak stream, hesitancy, inability to complete urination suddenly without postvoid dribbling, sensation of incomplete bladder emptying, straining to urinate, and urinary retention (in some men). These symptoms are associated with an enlarged prostate.
This symptom constellation causes most patients to seek medical attention. Most men have some, or many, of these symptoms in various degrees by the age of 70 years. The severity of symptoms and their correlation with urodynamic findings provide the basis for therapeutic intervention.
Histologic evidence in unselected autopsy specimens demonstrates that BPH occurs in more than 40% of men aged 50-60 years and in 90% of men aged 80-90 years. The majority of men older than 50 years have some symptoms attributable to BPH. Nearly 2 million office visits per year are from men seeking the evaluation and treatment of BPH. Surgeons perform more than 300,000 procedures per year on the prostate, and an estimated 900,000 men take some type of medication or herbal supplement for a prostate condition.
Approximately 25% of men aged 55 years note a decrease in the force of urine flow, and 50% of men describe this symptom by age 75 years. According to the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) index, the odds of a man aged 40-50 years developing moderate-to-severe symptoms (IPSS >8) increases with age, from 1.9 for men aged 50-59 years to 3.4 for men aged 70-79 years. The chances of men developing moderate-to-severe symptoms with a prostate larger than 50 g is 3.5 times greater than for men with smaller prostates; however, epidemiologic and clinical studies demonstrate that the relationship between prostate size and symptoms is not necessarily linear.
The proportion of men with clinical prostatism at any age is approximately the same as those with pathologic evidence of BPH, even though the correlation is poor between symptoms and prostate size. The dynamic or smooth muscle component associated with the symptoms of BPH explains this discordance; thus, some men with relatively small prostates may have severe symptoms, and some men with very large prostates may have few symptoms.
Patients' symptoms affect their quality of life. Interference with at least 1 daily activity occurs in 50% of patients, and 25% of patients report interference with activity most, or all, of the time.
Epidemiologic studies fail to demonstrate racial differences in prevalence of BPH histopathology, prostate size, or clinical diagnosis.
An inheritable form of BPH may be present in 50% of men younger than 60 years who are treated for this disease. Only 9% of men older than 60 years who are treated for BPH are predicted to have a familial risk. A large prostate size and a mean volume of 82.7 mL in men with hereditary BPH, compared to 55.5 mL in men with sporadic BPH, characterize BPH.
BPH is characterized by an increase in the number of epithelial and stromal cells in the periurethral area, or transition zone, of the prostate. Embryonic reawakening describes the presence of new epithelial gland formation. Increases in cell numbers may occur from epithelial and stromal proliferation or apoptosis impairment.
Etiology of the hyperplastic process relates to androgens, nonandrogen testicular factors, estrogen, stromal-epithelial interactions, growth factors, neurotransmitters, and other factors awaiting definition.
The two causative factors necessary for the development of BPH are aging and the presence of functional testes. The prostate is able to grow throughout adult life, and the process may be clinically evident in men as young as age 30-40 years.
The prostate consists of a network of glandular elements embedded in a fibrostromal network with a rich vascular supply. Androgens, estrogens, other growth factors, and various cytokines mediate the close interaction between these glandular and stromal cells. The growth process within the stroma perpetuates itself and exerts control on the gland growth rate and apoptotic cycle. The urine and semen also contain growth factors that may permeate the urethra and influence epithelial cell growth. Interactions between growth factors and steroid hormones may alter the balance of cell proliferation versus apoptosis.
BPH involves growth stimulatory factors with dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and other hormones modulating their effects, which are as follows:
The transforming growth factor beta inhibits epithelial cell proliferation, regulates extracellular matrix synthesis and degradation, and can induce apoptosis.
The role of the testis in BPH involves the production of androgen, estrogen, and nonandrogenic substances. These 2 hormones play a pivotal role in prostatic growth because the prostate is androgen-dependent and estrogen is mitogenic. The nuclear membrane-bound enzyme, 5aR, mediates the biochemical action of testosterone and is responsible for the conversion of testosterone to DHT (ie, the active agent within the cell). Patients with BPH maintain intraprostatic levels of DHT, but these levels are not elevated. DHT levels are the same in hyperplastic and healthy glands.
In adult prostates, androgen receptors are present on glandular and stromal cells, but 5aR is present only in stromal cells. Two 5aR enzymes are encoded by separate genes. Type 1 is the predominate enzyme in extraprostatic tissues, and type 2 is found largely in the prostate.
BPH also seems to have an inheritable genetic component. The hazard-function ratio between men treated surgically for BPH compared to first-degree male relatives of the controls was 4.2, indicating a very strong relationship. A segregation analysis shows that results are consistent with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.
Benign prostatic hypertrophy
The traditional BPH symptom complex is initiated by enlargement of the prostate, which leads to BOO and its associated symptomatology. However, prostate size, per se, does not determine the severity or the symptom complex associated with this condition. Some men with prostates larger than 75 mL have minimal difficulty voiding, have good flow rates, and empty their bladders. Some men have minimal prostatic enlargement with severe symptoms and need some type of intervention.
Lepor et al report on the results of over 400 men enrolled in the terazosin database. Their research could demonstrate no correlation between prostate size and either peak urinary flow rates or symptom scores. They conclude that treating patients just because of an enlarged prostate may not always relieve obstruction or improve symptoms.
The following mechanisms explain why BPH may produce BOO:
Controlled, randomized studies that focus on reducing prostate size and relaxing prostate smooth muscle consistently demonstrate improvement in flow rates and symptoms.
Prostatism
The prostatism theory postulates that increases in urethral resistance, which usually are associated with prostatic hyperplasia in the periurethral glands of the transition zone, result in compensatory changes in detrusor function. The resulting elevated detrusor pressures that are required to maintain urinary flow when outflow resistance is increasing occur at the expense of normal bladder function.
Changes in detrusor function (caused by obstruction), combined with incremental increases in smooth muscle tension and a resistant prostatic capsule and compounded by age-related changes in the detrusor and the nervous system, produce the characteristic symptoms of frequency, urgency, nocturia, and weak urine flow associated with prostatism.
Symptoms that characterize BPH and distinguish the need for some type of intervention of the prostate are as follows:
Indications for treatment depend on patient symptoms and their severity, the degree to which the symptoms bother the patient, and whether changes in bladder and renal function can be documented objectively. Some men have relatively few symptoms but are extremely bothered by them and desire therapy. Others may have significant symptoms but are quite content to live with them. Still others may have minimal symptoms but serious impairment of bladder and/or renal function.
Many men with mild-to-moderate symptoms or objective findings generally may respond to alpha-blockers, 5aR inhibitors, and herbal products such as saw palmetto and Pygeum africanum. Combinations of these agents are also used. Other interventional strategies should be used if the symptoms are not ameliorated to the patient's satisfaction, which can be judged based on an improvement in their symptom scores, or upon objective findings such as a decrease in urine flow rates, an increase in the postvoid residual, or deterioration of renal function. Some men develop side effects caused by these various agents and want the problem resolved permanently and expeditiously.
Review the options and create a management strategy if the patient's symptoms correlate with the objective data gathered from an evaluation of the urinary tract and the patient desires or needs therapy.
Absolute indications for intervention
Some men have silent prostatism in which serious deterioration of the bladder and/or renal function occurs with relatively few urinary symptoms.
Relative indications refer to the patient's symptoms and his desire to improve the clinical situation. Use the IPSS index to evaluate and follow the cases of these patients because the patient himself usually has difficulty recognizing changes in voiding, which often are subtle and somewhat variable daily.
After making the decision to intervene, determine next whether to alter the pharmacologic therapy or initiate some type of invasive procedure.
Interstitial laser coagulation therapy
Anatomy relevant to interstitial laser coagulation (ILC) therapy is assessed with a cystoscopic examination. The prostate consists of glandular elements embedded in a fibrostromal network with a rich vascular supply. Androgens, growth factors, and cytokines produced by the stromal cells mediate this interdependent relationship.
The development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) begins in a specific portion of the prostate, the transition zone, which encircles the urethra. This hyperplastic growth is initiated in men aged 30-35 years. Symptoms are thought to develop from the interaction among the following 3 components:
Few absolute contraindications exist for this procedure. Relative contraindications are as follows:
The prostatic tissue treated with ILC undergoes coagulative necrosis. Each treated area has approximately 2-3 mL of tissue destruction. Sloughing of necrotic tissue in the urine may occur if coagulation of the urethra is evident, but this is minimal and most of the tissue is absorbed over 6-8 weeks. No tissue is obtained from this procedure for the pathologist to examine.
If the PSA is elevated or if a suspicion of prostate cancer exists, biopsies should be obtained prior to any therapy.
Medical treatment therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) consists of 3 classes of agents: alpha-adrenergic blockers, 5aR inhibitors, and phytotherapeutics.
Alpha-adrenergic blockers
These represent a class of medicines that affect the rich supply of alpha-adrenergic receptors in the smooth muscles at the base of the bladder, the bladder outlet, and the smooth muscles within the prostate and proximal urethra. Blocking these receptors reduces tension in these smooth muscles, relieving the irritative symptoms manifested by urgency and frequency and improving urinary flow.
Several subtypes of the alpha-adrenergic receptors have been identified. The primary alpha-receptors in the prostatic urethra are alpha-1a and alpha-1d. The prostatic stromal tissue is largely alpha-1a. Alpha-adrenergic blockers can be divided into 3 groups, depending upon the affected receptor and their duration of action—nonselective, selective, and selective long acting.
The alpha-receptors in prostatic stromal tissue are largely the alpha-1a subtype. Inhibition of these receptors in the prostate and prostatic urethra reduces the symptoms associated with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Inhibition of the alpha-1d receptors diminishes the irritative symptoms, which frequently accompany this condition.
The 4 most common agents include terazosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, and alfuzosin. These agents have similar therapeutic effects. They improve voiding dynamics and provide symptom relief. In contrast to the nonspecific inhibitors, these agents are long acting (once-per-day dosing) and have fewer adverse effects. Long-term outcome studies of these drugs indicate that their effectiveness persists indefinitely. Because they do not affect prostate growth, patients who are receiving only alpha-blockers often develop increasing difficulty with urination as their prostate enlarges.
Nonselective blockers were the first agents found to be effective but are rarely administered today because of adverse side effects. Selective alpha-adrenergic blockers include prazosin (Flomax), alfuzosin (UroXatral), and terazosin (Hytrin). These agents have fewer side effects compared with the nonselective alpha blockers. Recently, a new alpha-1a receptor selective blocker, silodosin (Rapaflo), was approved.
The most common adverse effects, which occur in less than 20% of patients, include dizziness (19%), postural hypotension (6%), lightheadedness, asthenia (6%), and nasal stuffiness. No sexual dysfunction develops, but all of these agents except alfuzosin may cause retrograde ejaculation. This is an advantage for many men.
Tamsulosin and alfuzosin are the most selective of these agents for the prostate/bladder receptors. Dizziness and lightheadedness are problematic for some patients; those who are taking antihypertensive medications need to be cautious when they first start these medications. The use of these agents in conjunction with any of the 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction is not contraindicated.
5-Alpha reductase inhibitors
These medications, finasteride and dutasteride, inhibit the 5aR enzyme responsible for the conversion of testosterone into DHT.
Two genes produce this enzyme. Type 2 is located predominately in the prostate and is blocked by both agents, but dutasteride also blocks type 1. This dual action is more effective in lowering DHT levels. DHT is the active agent within the cell, and, by decreasing its level, cellular function is altered and the glandular component of the prostate atrophies.
Prostate size is reduced and PSA levels are lowered because of these alterations. The PSA level is usually decreased by 50% after 6 months of therapy. A multiplier of 2 converts the PSA to a level that can be comparable with levels obtained prior to the institution of therapy. This PSA level reduction persists so that the multiplier is 2.5 at 7 years.
The 5aR inhibitors significantly affect the prostate but do not always translate into symptomatic improvement. Patients who are most likely to benefit are those with symptoms that are primarily due to prostate glandular hyperplasia and in men whose prostates are 40 mL or larger. Unfortunately, determining how much of the obstruction relates to glandular or stromal hyperplasia is not easy. Six months of treatment or longer is necessary to achieve the maximum benefit from this type of medication.
Because they affect prostate growth patterns, 5aR inhibitors should theoretically be effective over a long period. A study compared the effects of an alpha-blocker, a 5aR inhibitor, a combination of the two, and placebo. The combination therapy was shown to be more efficacious than either single agent, and all showed better results when compared with the placebo control group.
The combination of these agents is helpful in reducing the incidence of urinary retention. Patients with BPH who are at very high medical risk of surgery should receive these agents to help prevent further prostatic enlargement.
They also are useful in reducing bleeding caused by invasive prostate surgery such as TURP. When used for this purpose, at least 2 weeks of therapy is recommended, and 2 months may be even better, when possible.
The agents that shrink the prostate the fastest are the luteinizing hormone–releasing factor (LHRH) agonists or antagonists, which work by suppressing testosterone production. These agents and the antiandrogens, which block the androgen receptors on the cell, are used to treat prostate cancer. They are not approved for use in BPH; however, short-term use is effective, particularly for men with urinary retention.
The most frequently used phytotherapeutics include saw palmetto, which is the fruit of Sabal serrulata (Serenoa repens), the root of Hypoxis rooperi, the bark of Pygeum africanum, pollen extract, the seeds of Cucurbita pepo, the leaves of the trembling poplar, and the roots of Echinacea purpurea.
Various mechanisms explain their actions, as follows:
Phytotherapeutic agents usually are offered in combinations. Preliminary studies show that some patients claim symptom improvement, which has led to further investigations indicating that potential benefit of these agents exists in men with mild-to-moderate symptoms.
No specific dosage is indicated for these agents. The recommendations of the manufacturer can be followed. Many of these agents are available in combinations. No specific adverse effects have been reported for these agents, but concerns have been raised about their use prior to surgery and the possibility of a coagulopathy.
Various interventional therapies are available to treat patients in whom medical therapy has failed or is not tolerated because of adverse effects.2,3 In some instances, the changes in a patient's urinary tract may have progressed to the point that medical therapy is inappropriate. Patients with hydronephrosis, renal insufficiency caused by obstruction, urinary tract bleeding, recurrent infections, or bladder stones need to have an immediate remedy and often should not wait until medications become effective.
Invasive surgeries include retropubic prostatectomy, suprapubic prostatectomy, and perineal prostatectomy.4 These procedures are usually performed in men with prostates larger than 80 mL in volume, when concomitant large bladder stones are present, or an associated problem needs to be surgically corrected.5
Minimally invasive surgery can be performed in most patients. These procedures can be performed with general, spinal, epidural, or conscious sedation or local anesthesia. These surgeries are usually performed on an outpatient bases either in the hospital, a surgery center, or in the office.
Transurethral resection of the prostate
For years, the standard surgical treatments were TURP or open prostatectomy (eg, classic suprapubic prostatectomy, retropubic prostatectomy).
These procedures have been proven to offer patients the most rapid symptom relief for a long duration. They offer minimal mortality rates, low morbidity, and the opportunity for permanent symptom relief.
In the past 10 years, less invasive procedures have been introduced. These include transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), which is a radiofrequency tissue-ablation therapy that can be performed in the office with local anesthesia. A current is passed through the antennae after insertion through a cystoscope. The antennae are extended from the probe and inserted into the prostatic tissue The microwave radiofrequency transmission produces heat between the 2 antenna needles. The heat is produced for a defined time, usually 2-3 minutes, and the antennae are withdrawn and inserted into a different part of the prostate. This process is repeated until the lateral lobe tissue is thoroughly treated. Middle-lobe tissue has been difficult to treat, but newer probes can treat these lobes. In properly selected patients, the results seem to be comparable with those of similar technologies.
Water intensity hyperthermia (WIT) is an office-based procedure in which a special 2-balloon catheter is placed into the bladder. One balloon is inflated in the bladder to hold it in position. The second is inflated within the prostatic urethra to a dimension of approximately 50 F. Hot water (45°C) is circulated through this balloon for 45 minutes. Patients usually need to wear a catheter for 7-10 days. This procedure has not been shown to have long lasting benefit, nor does it relieve the symptoms in many patients.
Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMP) is a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in the office. These procedures involve placing a specially designed catheter into the urethra and a temperature probe into the rectum. The prostate is heated for about 30-60 minutes, depending on the device, and the prostatic temperature should exceed 45°C.
Trock et al6 reported on the results of 541 men from 6 institutions who were treated with the Targis cooled thermotherapy system. Compared with baseline measurements, the AUA symptom score improved by 55%, peak urine flow increased by 51%, and quality-of-life scores by 53%. The authors noted that it may take 6 months before the maximum benefits have been obtained.
Interstitial laser therapy
Interstitial laser coagulation (ILC) candidates include men with obstructive uropathy from BPH and the following:
Newer procedures include the following:
Laser techniques include the following:
Advantages of laser therapy include the following:
Disadvantages of laser therapy include the following:
For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Prostate Health Center and Kidneys and Urinary System Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Enlarged Prostate and Bladder Control Problems.
Bleeding
The initial complication associated with interstitial laser coagulation (ILC) is bleeding that may last for several days and may occur intermittently for several weeks. Muschter and Hofstetter report significant hemorrhage in 5 of 239 (2.1%) patients, with 1 requiring a transfusion.10 The laser produces excellent tissue coagulation and hemostasis; however, the multiple punctures into the prostate produce bleeding that can last several days. This is particularly true in patients receiving anticoagulants. The bleeding is self-limiting, but leaving the catheter in place until the urine is clear is advisable. Preoperative use of finasteride or dutasteride has been suggested to help limit intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. A minimum of 2 weeks of therapy is needed for this potential benefit. The medication can be stopped once the catheter is removed, the patient is voiding well, and any gross hematuria has resolved.
Prolonged catheter drainage
The second complication is prolonged catheter drainage. Most patients need to be catheterized for 5-7 days. Muschter et al report a mean catheterization time of 18.3 days, but this report was conducted with older technology. Currently, physicians are prescribing patients alpha-adrenergic blockers to shorten the catheterization period. Re-evaluate patients who still cannot void after 4 weeks because they most likely cannot void spontaneously. If the patient originally had a severely atonic bladder, the situation may be permanent. Persistent retention may be managed with a repeat laser procedure, TURP, or continued catheter drainage.
Other complications
Other potential problems include urinary tract infection, epididymitis from prolonged catheter drainage, or a urethral stricture from the catheter. Muschter et al reported an initial series of 239 patients with a stricture rate of 3.8% and bladder neck contracture in 1.7%. Persistent obstruction caused a re-treatment rate of 9.6%.
In a more recent series of 112 men that used newer technology, Muschter et al report no major complications, but 3 (2.7%) patients required reoperation.11
Arai (1996) reported no serious treatment-related complications in a 3-month study of 50 patients.12
Troublesome complications occurred in 12.6% of patients who reported irritative symptoms. Although urgency or stress incontinence can occur early in the postoperative period, no reports show sustained incontinence or prolonged irritative symptoms.
Proper selection of patients and increased experience with this technique has demonstrated that the procedure is safe with few major complications. Significant bleeding occurs in less than 2% of patients, retrograde ejaculation occurs in 15%, and strictures or bladder neck contracture occurs in 1%.
Reports show that a major benefit of the interstitial laser coagulation (ILC) procedure is the retention of sexual function. Approximately 0-11.9% of patients report retrograde ejaculation, as compared to almost 100% of men who are treated with a TURP. In a group of 239 men treated with ILC, Muschter and Hofstetter report a 7% incidence of postoperative retrograde ejaculation in 163 sexually active men. Arai (1996) found a 4% incidence of new retrograde ejaculation,12 and Muschter et al report a 6% incidence in a multicenter trial.
This procedure has been performed for more than 10 years. Muschter and Hofstetter reported the largest single institutional experience using an earlier interstitial laser system. Their study of 239 patients concluded that their patients had significant clinical improvement in symptoms, which correlates with objective changes in voiding during a 12-month follow-up study. The mean preoperative peak urine flow for this group was 7.7 mL/s, which improved to 16.3 mL/s at 3 months and improved slightly at 6 and 12 months to 17.9 mL/s and 17.8 mL/s, respectively.
Postvoid residuals decreased from a mean of 151 mL before surgery to 32 mL at 3 months, 28 mL at 6 months, and 29 mL at 12 months. The AUA symptom score presents a decrease from 25.4 originally to 8.1 at 3 months and 6.6 at both 6 and 12 months. Prostate volumes, as determined by transrectal ultrasound, show a decrease at an average of 32%.
Using the current indigo diode interstitial delivery system, with an 830-nm probe, Muschter reports on the 6-month outcomes of 112 men in a multicenter trial. Mean AUA symptom scores show a decline from 20.9 to 7.9, residual urine decrease from 105 to 38 mL, and peak flow rate improvement from 8-14.2 mL/s.
In a more recent trial, researchers randomly performed ILC or TURP on a group of patients. Comparing the preliminary results in 78 men treated with ILC to 59 receiving a TURP, both groups show significant improvement in voiding, but the TURP patients present the best voiding outcomes. At 6 months after surgery, the TURP group shows an AUA symptom score of 6 compared to 9.5 for the ILC patients. Peak flow rates are 19.4 mL/s for the TURP patients and 14.1 mL/s for ILC patients.
Arai et al (1996) reported 3-month outcome results on 50 patients. Mean AUA symptom scores show a decrease from 20.1 to 10.0, a postvoid residual urine volumes decrease from 90 mL to 45 mL, and a peak flow rate improvement from 7.0-9.5 mL/s. Arai et al report no significant complications and a rate of 80% of the patients expressing treatment satisfaction.12
In the short term, patients seem to tolerate the procedure very well and report satisfaction with the procedure. Few studies directly compare ILC in a prospective randomized manner to other forms of laser surgery. This is true of most of the newer technologies, which makes comparisons difficult.
In the longer term, re-treatment rates will be important. For TURP, re-treatment rates are about 20%. No reason exists to believe that ILC will be any better, except that ILC may be used in older, more fragile men with shorter life spans.
Urologists have a variety of procedures and medications that they can use to manage patients with symptoms and findings associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Physicians usually start patients on medications once they decide to initiate therapy. If patients respond poorly to pharmacologic therapy, some type of interventional therapy is appropriate.
The decision as to which type of intervention would best suit the patient depends upon the patient's situation, his medical condition, the size of his prostate, and the familiarity of the urologist with the various procedures. Most urologists are highly skilled in performing a TURP, which is likely to provide immediate relief of symptoms for a long period. Careful selection of the most appropriate procedure requires careful patient assessment and patient consultation regarding various alternatives.
Various new and competing technologies have been developed. These include thermotherapies such as microwave, heated water (WIT), radiofrequency tissue ablation, laser vaporization of the prostate, holmium laser resection, and high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Clinicians and patients benefit from the availability of an assortment of therapies. Thus far, no studies have been conducted with direct comparisons between these modalities.
Interstitial laser coagulation (ILC) offers a safe, effective, and relatively easy-to-learn technology for surgical treatment of BPH. Voiding is significantly improved and symptoms are reduced, but they are not comparable with the results achieved with transurethral resection electrocautery and some other laser techniques. ILC is associated with minimal morbidity but may have no advantage over free-beam lasers. The need for prolonged catheter drainage and the occurrence of postoperative irritative symptoms are similar with other treatments, although some of the current devices used for microwave thermotherapy eliminate the need for a catheter. The same is true for laser ablation. Most patients can leave without an indwelling catheter.
No immediate tissue loss is associated with ILC, and preservation of the urethra minimizes the tissue slough associated with free-beam laser techniques. Coagulated tissue is resorbed, but the reduction in prostate volume is less than that observed with other techniques. This reduction may correlate with the re-treatment rates, which appear higher than some other laser methods.
Daehlin L, Frugård J. Interstitial laser coagulation in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction from benign prostatic hyperplasia: long-term follow-up. BJU Int. Jul 2007;100(1):89-93. [Medline].
Muschter R, Reich O. [Surgical and instrumental management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.]. Urologe A. Feb 2008;47(2):155-165. [Medline].
Armstrong N, Vale L, Deverill M, Nabi G, McClinton S, N'Dow J, et al. Surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement: cost effectiveness study. BMJ. Apr 16 2009;338:b1288. [Medline].
Tayib AM. Laser prostatectomy in high-risk patients. Saudi Med J. Jun 2008;29(6):867-70. [Medline].
Zhu QY, Gu XJ, Yuan L, Huang WZ, Zhang L, Lu ZJ, et al. [TUBVP and HOLEP: desirable surgical options for large benign prostatic hyperplasia ( >80 ml)]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. Oct 2008;14(10):907-10. [Medline].
Trock BJ, Brotzman M, Utz WJ. Long-term pooled analysis of multicenter studies of cooled thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia results at three months through four years. Urology. Apr 2004;63(4):716-21.
Richter M, Schwarz J, De Geeter P, Albers P. [Holmium laser ablation of the prostate : An alternative to GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate.]. Urologe A. Mar 2009;48(3):291-5. [Medline].
Naspro R, Bachmann A, Gilling P, Kuntz R, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, et al. A Review of the Recent Evidence (2006-2008) for 532-nm Photoselective Laser Vaporisation and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. Eur Urol. Apr 3 2009;[Medline].
Coz F, Domenech A. [KTP (green light) laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Preliminary evaluation]. Prog Urol. Sep 2007;17(5):950-3. [Medline].
Muschter R, Hofstetter A. Technique and results of interstitial laser coagulation. World J Urol. 1995;13(2):109-14. [Medline].
Muschter R, de la Rosette JJ, Whitfield H, et al. Initial human clinical experience with diode laser interstitial treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. Aug 1996;48(2):223-8. [Medline].
Arai Y, Ishitoya S, Okubo K, Suzuki Y. Transurethral interstitial laser coagulation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: treatment outcome and quality of life. Br J Urol. Jul 1996;78(1):93-8. [Medline].
al Sudani M, McNicholas TA. Urinary tract infection following laser prostatectomy. Br J Urol. Nov 1996;78(5):805-6. [Medline].
Andersson KE, Wein AJ. Pharmacology of the lower urinary tract: basis for current and future treatments of urinary incontinence. Pharmacol Rev. Dec 2004;56(4):581-631.
Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol. Nov 1992;148(5):1549-57; discussion 1564. [Medline].
Blaivas JG. Pathophysiology and differential diagnosis of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Urology. Dec 1988;32(6 Suppl):5-11. [Medline].
Costello AJ, Bolton DM, Ellis D, Crowe H. Histopathological changes in human prostatic adenoma following neodymium:YAG laser ablation therapy. J Urol. Nov 1994;152(5 Pt 1):1526-9. [Medline].
Cowan DF, Orihuela E, Motamedi M, et al. Histopathologic effects of laser radiation on the human prostate. Mod Pathol. Sep 1995;8(7):716-21. [Medline].
de la Rosette J, Floratos D, Laguna PM. Durability of efficacy of TUMT versus TURP. Results of a randomized study. [abstract 1505]. J Urol. 2001;165 (Suppl):367.
Debruyne F. Phytotherapy (LSESR) vs an a-blocker for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostate enlargement: A randomized comparative trial. [abstract 1562]. J Urol. 2001;165 (Suppl):381.
Djavan B, Chapple C, Milani S, Marberger M. State of the art on the efficacy and tolerability of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. Dec 2004;64(6):1081-8.
Guess HA. Epidemiology and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. May 1995;22(2):247-61. [Medline].
Hampel C, Dolber PC, Smith MP, et al. Modulation of bladder alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtype expression by bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. Mar 2002;167(3):1513-21. [Medline].
Henkel TO, Greschner M, Luppold T. Transurethral and transperineal interstitial laser therapy of BPH. Laser-Induced Interstitial Thermotherapy. 1995:416-25.
Hoffman RM, MacDonald R, Monga M, Wilt TJ. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy vs transurethral resection for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. BJU Int. Nov 2004;94(7):1031-6. [Medline].
Horinger W, Janteshek G, Pointner J. Are TULIP, interstitial laser and contact laser superior to TURP?. J Urol. 1995;153:413A.
Johnson DE, Cromeens DM, Price RE. Interstitial laser prostatectomy. Lasers Surg Med. 1994;14(4):299-305. [Medline].
Kabalin JN. Invasive Therapies for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Monogr Urol. 1997;18:17-47.
Kabalin JN, Albala DM, Koleski F. Office-based transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using the Thermatrx TMX-2000: Results of a multi-center prospective randomized sham-controlled trial. [abstract 1506]. J Urol. 2001;165 (Suppl):367.
Kabalin JN, Butler ED. Costs of minimally invasive laser surgery compared with transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate. West J Med. May 1995;162(5):426-9. [Medline].
Lee C, Kozlowski JM, Grayhack JT. Etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. May 1995;22(2):237-46. [Medline].
Lopez M, Vargas JC, Muschter R. The size of intraprostatic laser lesions can be controlled by temperature. J Urol. 1997;157:14A.
Madsen FA, Bruskewitz RC. Clinical manifestations of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. May 1995;22(2):291-8. [Medline].
Malloy BJ, Price DT, Price RR, et al. Alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtypes in human detrusor. J Urol. Sep 1998;160(3 Pt 1):937-43. [Medline].
McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, et al. The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. Dec 18 2003;349(25):2387-98.
McNicholas TA, Pope AJ, Timoney A. Hyperthermia of the prostate by interstitial laser coagulation. J Urol. 1992;147:345A.
McNicholas TA, Steger AC, Bown SG. Interstitial laser coagulation of the prostate. An experimental study. Br J Urol. Apr 1993;71(4):439-44. [Medline].
Mueller-Lisse UG, Heuck AF, Schneede P, et al. Postoperative MRI in patients undergoing interstitial laser coagulation thermotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Mar-Apr 1996;20(2):273-8. [Medline].
Muschter R. Interstitial laser therapy. Curr Opin Urol. 1996;6:33-8.
Muschter R, Ehsan A, Stepp HG. Clinical results of LITT in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Laser-Induced Interstitial Thermotherapy. 1995:434-42.
Muschter R, Hofstetter A. Interstitial laser therapy outcomes in benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol. Apr 1995;9(2):129-35. [Medline].
Muschter R, Hofstetter A. [Laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Urologe A. Jul 1994;33(4):281-7. [Medline].
Muschter R, Perlmutter AP. The optimization of laser prostatectomy. Part II: Other lasing techniques. Urology. Dec 1994;44(6):856-61. [Medline].
Muschter R, Zellner M, Hessel S, Hofstetter A. [Interstitial laser-induced coagulation of the prostate for therapy of benign hyperplasia]. Urologe A. Mar 1995;34(2):90-7. [Medline].
Nishizawa K, Kobayashi T, Mitsumori K, Watanabe J, Ogura K. Intermittent catheterization time required after interstitial laser coagulation of the prostate. Urology. Jul 2004;64(1):79-83. [Medline].
Perlmutter AP, Muschter R. Interstitial laser prostatectomy. Mayo Clin Proc. Sep 1998;73(9):903-7. [Medline].
[Guideline] Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD. AUA Practice Guidelines Committee: AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter I: diagnosis and treatment recommendation. J Urol. 2003;170:530-547.
Seitz C, Djavan B, Hruby S. Efficacy of high energy TUMT in BPH patients after failure of medical therapy. [abstract 1508]. J Urol. 2001;165 (Suppl 5):368.
Shapiro E, Lepor H. Pathophysiology of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. May 1995;22(2):285-90. [Medline].
[Guideline] Speakman MJ, Kirby RS, Joyce A, Abrams P, Pocock R. Guideline for the primary care management of male lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int. May 2004;93(7):985-90. [Medline].
Virdi JS, Chandrasekar P, Kapasi F. Interstitial laser ablation (Indigo) of the prostate-a randomized prospective study, three year followup. [abstract 1507]. J Urol. 2001;165 (Suppl):368.
Whitfield HN. A randomized prospective multi-center study evaluating the efficacy of interstitial laser coagulation. J Urol. 1996;155:318A.
Whitfield HN, Meganathan V. Interstitial diode laser (Indigo) in BPH: A randomized, prospective study. Eur Urol. 1996;30 (Suppl 2):261-270.
interstitial laser coagulation, ILC, indigo laser prostatectomy, interstitial laser prostatectomy, microwave thermotherapy, PPV laser prostatectomy, green light laser, holmium laser prostatectomy, HoLaP, high-intensity focused ultrasound, HIFU
Stanley A Brosman, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Urology, University of California at Los Angeles Medical School
Stanley A Brosman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Urological Association, Association of Clinical Research Professionals, International Society of Urological Pathology, Société Internationale d'Urologie (International Society of Urology), Society for Basic Urologic Research, Society of Surgical Oncology, Society of Urologic Oncology, and Western Section American Urological Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment
Mark Jeffrey Noble, MD, Consulting Staff, Urologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Mark Jeffrey Noble, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Urological Association, Kansas Medical Society, Sigma Xi, Society of University Urologists, and Southwest Oncology Group
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS, David A Bloom Professor of Urology, Director of Division of Minimally Invasive Urology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan
J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Catholic Medical Association, Endourological Society, Society for Urology and Engineering, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, and Society of Urologic Oncology
Disclosure: Terumo Corporation Consulting fee Consulting; Omeros Corporation Consulting fee Consulting
Edward David Kim, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, University of Tennessee Medical Center
Edward David Kim, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association, and Tennessee Medical Association
Disclosure: Lilly Consulting fee Consulting; Astellas Consulting fee Speaking and teaching; Indevus Consulting fee Speaking and teaching
Clinical trials
Phase 1 Study of the Litx™ BPH System in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
PROLIEVE® Post-Marketing Study TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA (BPH)
Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Ozarelix in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Study of Light-Activated Talaporfin Sodium in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Clinical Evaluation of NX-1207 for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) NX02-0018
© 1994-
by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)