Ureterocalicostomy 

  • Author: Martha K Terris, MD, FACS; Chief Editor: Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Jan 23, 2012
 

Background

Ureterocalicostomy (UCO) is a procedure used to anastomose nondilated healthy ureter proximal to the lower calyceal system, which is exposed via amputation of the most dependent portion of the lower pole of the kidney, in order to bypass severe peripelvic fibrosis with a ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction or a long proximal ureteral stricture if the renal pelvis is scarred or intrarenal in location. See image below.

Diagram of ureterocalicostomy procedure. The left Diagram of ureterocalicostomy procedure. The left image shows an obstructed kidney with an intrarenal pelvis with dotted lines delineating the areas of the surgical resection. The middle image depicts the kidney following division of the ureter distal to the obstruction and resection of the lower pole of the kidney. The right image is a representation of the ureter anastomosed to the lower-pole calyx.
Next

History of the Procedure

Originally described by Neuwirt in 1947,[1] ureterocalicostomy was slow to gain popularity. The small number of cases was due, in part, to the limited number of appropriate cases and the high restricture rate. Modern ureterocalicostomy was described by Hawthorne et al in 1976.[2] Prior to these authors' innovations, ureterocalicostomy was performed with minimal resection of lower-pole tissue and was prone to anastomotic stricture and obstruction. Hawthorne et al introduced the importance of generous resection of the lower pole, extending cephalad to the intended calyx to be anastomosed to the ureter, in order to free the ureterocaliceal anastomosis from the surrounding cortical tissue. As prenatal ultrasonography has increased the number of UPJ obstruction diagnoses and subsequent procedures used to correct the condition, complications of pyeloplasty have increased the need for this procedure.

Previous
Next

Problem

Peripelvic fibrosis, a scarred contracted renal pelvis, or an intrarenal pelvis in combination with a proximal ureteral stricture may prevent UPJ reconstruction by standard pyeloplasty or endopyelotomy. Two surgical options remain in this situation: ureteropyelostomy and ureterocalicostomy. Ureteropyelostomy (anastomosing the healthy ureter to the renal pelvis) is preferred, but, if ureteral length is insufficient to perform a tension-free anastomosis (even when combined with a psoas hitch and/or nephropexy), ureterocalicostomy is an option. The kidney is doomed without surgical correction of the obstruction. With the advent of endoscopic surgical procedures, ureterocalicostomy is also used to manage failed endourological procedures or complications caused by them.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

The most common indication for ureterocalicostomy is proximal ureteral stricture in combination with pelvic fibrosis or intrarenal pelvis occurring after multiple failed pyeloplasty attempts. Fortunately, this is extremely rare. Fewer than 0.5% of patients who undergo pyeloplasty subsequently require salvage with ureterocalicostomy. Even more scarce are cases requiring ureterocalicostomy for a horseshoe kidney, ischemic fibrosis of the renal pelvis/ureter in renal transplants, traumatic avulsion of the proximal ureter and/or renal pelvis, extensive fibrosis following surgery for upper urinary tract stone disease, or following ablative techniques such as cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation of lower pole renal masses.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Peripelvic fibrosis with long proximal ureteral strictures is usually the result of a failed pyeloplasty or other surgical procedures, stone disease, inflammatory processes, or trauma. Occasionally, similar severe obstruction can be observed in transplanted kidneys in which the transplanted ureter became devascularized during harvest. Horseshoe kidneys have also been salvaged with ureterocalicostomy.

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Histologic findings of benign proximal ureteral strictures are nonspecific. Scar formation with collagen deposition and inflammatory infiltrate may be prominent. The obstruction can result in impairment of renal function, pain, infection, and/or stones.

Previous
Next

Presentation

Clinical symptoms of obstruction include urosepsis, failure to thrive, flank pain or mass, and hematuria. As first described by Dietl, the episodes of flank pain, nausea, and vomiting may present during periods of rapid diuresis with large volumes of liquid intake (so-called Dietl crisis). This may manifest only after consumption of liquids that promote brisk diuresis, such as beer or coffee.

Most patients who require ureterocalicostomy have a history of pyeloplasty, other urinary tract surgery (including ureteroscopy and endopyelotomy), stones, cancer, or trauma.

Previous
Next

Indications

When pyeloplasty attempts for UPJ obstruction have failed and result in significant peripelvic fibrosis or a relatively long gap between the renal pelvis and the nonobstructed proximal ureter, the kidney can be salvaged with anastomosis of the proximal ureter directly to the lower calyceal system. This technique (ie, ureterocalicostomy) may also be used as the primary reconstructive procedure when a UPJ obstruction or proximal ureteral stricture is associated with a relatively small intrarenal pelvis. In this situation, repeat open or percutaneous pyeloplasty and balloon dilation carry high restricture rates. If an extended length of ureter is not involved in the fibrotic/stenotic process, retrograde endopyelotomy with an Accusize catheter or ureteropyelostomy should be attempted before resorting to other types of repair, including ureterocalicostomy, ileal interposition, and autotransplantation.

Ureterocalicostomy is also a useful option when the UPJ is associated with a horseshoe or malrotated kidney in which a standard pyeloplasty does not result in dependent drainage of the collecting system.

Alternatives to ureterocalicostomy include autotransplantation with or without a Boari flap pyelovesicostomy;[3] ileal interposition graft; long-term nephrostomy tube or ureteral stent placement; renal capsule, peritoneal, or pericardial flap;[4] Davis intubated ureterotomy,[5] and nephrectomy. The decision to perform a nephrectomy must be based on the level of function in the obstructed kidney and the function of the contralateral kidney. If the renal function of the affected kidney is less than 25%, surgical correction has a high risk for failure, and nephrectomy may ultimately be required. If the patient's renal function is less than 10%, recovery is unlikely and initial nephrectomy may be most appropriate.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

The ureteral length is 20-30 cm, depending on the individual's height. The lumen size is 4-10 mm in circumference, depending on its location. The narrowest areas are the UPJ, the overpass by the ureter where it crosses over the bifurcation of the iliac arteries, and the ureterovesical junction (UVJ).

In both men and women, the ureter courses posterior to the gonadal vessels and anterior to the iliopsoas muscles, crosses the common iliac artery and vein, and enters inferiorly into the pelvis. In men, the vas deferens loops anterior to the ureter prior to the ureter entering the bladder. In women, the ureter courses posterior to the uterine arteries (hence the "water under the bridge" analogy) and is in close proximity to the uterine cervix prior to reaching the intramural bladder.

The ureteral blood supply comes from multiple sources. Superiorly, the renal artery may branch and supply the ureter, along with the gonadal artery. As the ureter courses through the retroperitoneum, the aorta contributes numerous small branches. In the pelvis, the iliac, vesical, uterine, and hemorrhoidal arteries also contribute to the blood supply of the ureter.

The venous drainage is paired with the arteries. Knowledge of this vascular supply is crucial in ureteral surgery, because a devascularized ureter is subject to complications of stricture and leak. Lymphatic drainage of the upper ureter joins the renal lymphatics to the lumbar nodes. The middle ureter drains to the common and internal iliac nodes. The lymphatic vessels of the pelvic ureter drain to the internal iliac and vesical nodes. For more information about the relevant anatomy, see Ureter Anatomy and Kidney Anatomy.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

  • The major contraindication to any ureteral stricture surgery is an active and untreated urinary tract infection.
  • A relative contraindication is uncorrected bleeding diathesis.
  • If the patient has a terminal malignancy, is extremely elderly, or has a high surgical risk and tolerates internal stenting well, then long-term stenting may be most appropriate.
  • If the patient's renal function is less than 10%, then recovery is unlikely and initial nephrectomy may be most appropriate.
  • Ureteral obstruction due to retroperitoneal malignancy, lymphadenopathy, or retroperitoneal fibrosis is a relative contraindication to ureterocalicostomy.
  • Strictures due to urinary tuberculosis that have not been treated medically and have been stable for less than 3-6 months are also a contraindication because postinflammatory scarring may continue to develop.
  • If the length of the ureteral defect prohibits performance of a tension-free ureterocalyceal anastomosis, autotransplantation or ileal interposition is more appropriate.
  • The presence of malignancy, primarily transitional cell carcinoma, is a contraindication to ureterocalicostomy. However, peripelvic and focal proximal ureteral fibrosis resulting from endoscopic resection of transitional cell carcinoma or curative chemotherapy and/or radiation for retroperitoneal malignancy may be amenable to ureterocalicostomy, but such cases are rare.
Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Martha K Terris, MD, FACS  Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, Director, Urology Residency Training Program, Medical College of Georgia; Professor, Department of Physician Assistants, Medical College of Georgia School of Allied Health; Chief, Section of Urology, Augusta Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Martha K Terris, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Cancer Society, American College of Surgeons, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Urological Association, Association of Women Surgeons, New York Academy of Sciences, Society of Government Service Urologists, Society of University Urologists, Society of Urology Chairpersons and Program Directors, and Society of Women in Urology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Kashif Siddiqi, MD, MS  Staff Physician, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia

Kashif Siddiqi, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Peter Langenstroer, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin

Peter Langenstroer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Urological Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS  The David A Bloom Professor of Urology, Director, Division of Endourology and Stone Disease, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School

J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Catholic Medical Association, Endourological Society, Society for Urology and Engineering, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, and Society of Urologic Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS  Professor of Urology, Director, Center for Laparoscopy and Endourology, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Association of Military Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons, Endourological Society, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, and Society of University Urologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Neuwirt K. Implantation of the ureter into the lower calyx of the renal pelvis. In: VII Congres de la Societe Internationale d'Urologie, part 2. 1947;253-55.

  2. Hawthorne NJ, Zincke H, Kelalis PP. Ureterocalicostomy: an alternative to nephrectomy. J Urol. May 1976;115(5):583-6. [Medline].

  3. Deweerd JH, Paulk SC, Tomera FM, Smith LH. Renal autotransplantation for upper ureteral stenosis. J Urol. Jul 1976;116(1):23-5. [Medline].

  4. Thüroff JW, Hutschenreiter G, Frohneberg D, Hohenfellner R. Transplantation of a free peritoneal patch in surgery of the renal pelvis and ureter. Eur Urol. 1981;7(5):304-11. [Medline].

  5. Wesolowski S, Borkowski A. [Late results of surgical treatment of pelvo-ureteral stenosis by the Davis intubated ureterotomy method]. Pol Przegl Chir. Jun 1975;47(6A):821-9. [Medline].

  6. Gill IS, Cherullo EE, Steinberg AP, Desai MM, Abreu SC, Ng C, et al. Laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy: initial experience. J Urol. Mar 2004;171(3):1227-30. [Medline].

  7. Terai A, Kamoto T, Ogawa O. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterocalicostomy for congenital proximal ureteral stenosis. Urology. May 2004;63(5):982-4. [Medline].

  8. Radford AR, Thomas DF, Subramaniam R. Ureterocalicostomy in children: 12 years experience in a single centre. BJU Int. Aug 2011;108(3):434-8. [Medline].

  9. Osman T, Eltahawy I, Fawaz K, Shoeib M, Elshawaf H, El Halaby R. Ureterocalicostomy for treatment of complex cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology. Jul 2011;78(1):202-7. [Medline].

  10. Mufarrij PW, Shah OD, Berger AD, Stifelman MD. Robotic reconstruction of the upper urinary tract. J Urol. Nov 2007;178(5):2002-5. [Medline].

  11. Casale P, Mucksavage P, Resnick M, Kim SS. Robotic ureterocalicostomy in the pediatric population. J Urol. Dec 2008;180(6):2643-8. [Medline].

  12. Gupta CL, Bapna BC, Rao MS. Ureterocalycostomy for postpyelolithotomy stenosis after failure of intubated infundibuloplasty. Urology. Aug 1980;16(2):190-3. [Medline].

  13. Naude JH. Buccal mucosal grafts in the treatment of ureteric lesions. BJU Int. May 1999;83(7):751-4. [Medline].

  14. Atala A. Tissue engineering in urologic surgery. Urol Clin North Am. Feb 1998;25(1):39-50. [Medline].

  15. Ambiavagar R, Nambiar R. Traumatic closed avulsion of the upper ureter. Injury. Aug 1979;11(1):71-6. [Medline].

  16. Cherullo EE, Gill IS, Ponsky LE, Banks KL, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, et al. Laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy: a feasibility study. J Urol. Jun 2003;169(6):2360-4. [Medline].

  17. Dewan PA, Clark S, Condron S. Point of technique: Ureterocalycostomy in the management of pelvi- ureteric junction obstruction in the horseshoe kidney. BJU Int. Aug 1999;84(3):366-8. [Medline].

  18. Duckett JW, Pfister RR. Ureterocalicostomy for renal salvage. J Urol. Jul 1982;128(1):98-101. [Medline].

  19. Green DF, Lytton B, Glickman M. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Urol. Sep 1987;138(3):599-602. [Medline].

  20. Greene KL, Meng MV, Abrahams HM, Freise CE, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic-assisted upper pole ureterocalicostomy using renal inversion and autotransplantation. Urology. Jun 2004;63(6):1182-4. [Medline].

  21. Hjort EF, Boe OW. Partial resection of the renal pelvis and lower pole of the kidney for hydronephrosis. Br J Urol. Aug 1971;43(4):406-20. [Medline].

  22. Jarowenko MV, Flechner SM. Recipient ureterocalycostomy in a renal allograft: case report of a transplant salvage. J Urol. May 1985;133(5):844-5. [Medline].

  23. Kay R. Ureterocalicostomy. Urol Clin North Am. Feb 1988;15(1):129-33. [Medline].

  24. Levitt SB, Nabizadeh I, Javaid M. Primary calycoureterostomy for pelvioureteral junction obstruction: indications and results. J Urol. Sep 1981;126(3):382-6. [Medline].

  25. Matlaga BR, Shah OD, Singh D, Streem SB, Assimos DG. Ureterocalicostomy: a contemporary experience. Urology. Jan 2005;65(1):42-4. [Medline].

  26. Mesrobian HG, Kelalis PP. Ureterocalicostomy: indications and results in 21 patients. J Urol. Nov 1989;142(5):1285-7. [Medline].

  27. Mollard P, Braun P. Primary ureterocalycostomy for severe hydronephrosis in children. J Pediatr Surg. Feb 1980;15(1):87-91. [Medline].

  28. Moloney GE. Avulsion of the renal pelvis treated by ureterocalycostomy. Br J Urol. Oct 1970;42(5):519-21. [Medline].

  29. Rohrmann D, Snyder HM 3rd, Duckett JW Jr. The operative management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. Sep 1997;158(3 Pt 2):1257-9. [Medline].

  30. Ross JH, Streem SB, Novick AC. Ureterocalicostomy for reconstruction of complicated pelviureteric junction obstruction. Br J Urol. Apr 1990;65(4):322-5. [Medline].

  31. Selli C, Rizzo M, Moroni F. Ureterocalicostomy in the treatment of pyeloplasty failures. Urol Int. 1992;48(3):274-7. [Medline].

  32. Smith AD. Management of iatrogenic ureteral strictures after urological procedures. J Urol. Dec 1988;140(6):1372-4. [Medline].

  33. Steffens J, Humke U, Haben B, Stark E, Breitling P, Treiyer A. Open ureterocalycostomy. BJU Int. Feb 2008;101(3):397-407. [Medline].

  34. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, Adams MC, Pope JC 4th, Brock JW 3rd. Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review. J Urol. Dec 2005;174(6):2363-6. [Medline].

  35. Wolf JS Jr, Elashry OM, Clayman RV. Long-term results of endoureterotomy for benign ureteral and ureteroenteric strictures. J Urol. Sep 1997;158(3 Pt 1):759-64. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Diagram of ureterocalicostomy procedure. The left image shows an obstructed kidney with an intrarenal pelvis with dotted lines delineating the areas of the surgical resection. The middle image depicts the kidney following division of the ureter distal to the obstruction and resection of the lower pole of the kidney. The right image is a representation of the ureter anastomosed to the lower-pole calyx.
Twenty-four-year-old veteran who suffered a high-velocity injury in Iraq, including spinal cord injury, multiple bowel perforations, and left ureteral transection. A cutaneous ureterostomy was performed and nephrostomy tube placed emergently at the time of the injury. Other issues stabilized, and he then underwent evaluation for definitive management of ureteral transection. Cutaneous ureterostomy is nonfunctioning. Antegrade nephrostography performed at the time of nephrostomy tube change showed a blind-ending renal pelvis.
Thirty-six-year-old patient who underwent two prior attempts at left pyeloplasty, with recurrent obstruction. Nephrostogram shows an obliterated ureteropelvic junction.
Postoperative intravenous pyelogram showing drainage from calyx into ureter after ureterocalicostomy.
Intraoperative photograph during ureterocalicostomy. The lower pole of the kidney has been identified. The ureter has been dissected and the atretic segment divided.
The ureter has been spatulated and anastomosed to the lower pole calyx over a ureteral stent. The fat pad to the left of the anastomosis will be wrapped around the anastomosis and a drain will be placed.
Simultaneous retrograde pyelogram and antegrade nephrostogram shows blind-ending renal pelvis and significant defect between pelvis and residual distal ureter. The renal pelvis is not completely obliterated, and it may have been reasonable to consider pyeloplasty if the distal ureter was of sufficient length. However, the proximal portion of residual distal ureter is tortuous, medially deviated, and in the area of a significant amount of prior injury and exploration, which will likely prevent isolating adequate length of viable ureter for ureterocalicostomy. This patient underwent autotransplantation.
The lower pole of the kidney has been amputated and the lower pole calyx identified. Both the kidney and ureter are mobilized to allow a tension-free anastomosis.
Sixty-one-year-old patient with a history of radiofrequency ablation of left lower-pole renal mass with subsequent fibrosis of the extrarenal portion of the renal pelvis and proximal ureter. Simultaneous antegrade nephrostogram and retrograde pyelogram show a relatively short defect and healthy-appearing distal ureter. A ureteral stent is placed in the distal ureteral segment to aide in intraoperative identification.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.