eMedicine Specialties > Urology > Male Infertility

Vasovasostomy and Vasoepididymostomy

Author: Edmund S Sabanegh Jr, MD, Director, Center for Male Fertility, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Coauthor(s): Mary K Samplaski, MD, Staff Physician, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 14, 2009

Introduction

Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy are surgical procedures designed to bypass an obstruction in the male genital tract. These procedures are usually performed to restore fertility, although they are occasionally undertaken to relieve pain, such as in postvasectomy pain syndromes.

Vasovasostomy involves the anastomosis of segments of the vas deferens above and below an obstruction. The vast majority of vasovasostomies are performed to reverse a prior vasectomy, but the procedure is occasionally indicated for repair of an iatrogenic vasal injury secondary to prior surgery (eg, inguinal herniorrhaphy).

Vasoepididymostomy is a technically more demanding procedure than vasovasostomy. It involves anastomosis of the vas deferens to the epididymis in order to bypass an epididymal obstruction. This obstruction may be secondary to long-standing vasal obstruction resulting in damage to an epididymal tubule (epididymal blowout) or may result from epididymal infections or trauma.

History of the Procedure

Surgical procedures to remove genital tract obstructions and to restore fertility have been attempted for almost 100 years. In 1903, Martin et al first reported a technique for vasoepididymostomy to treat an obstructed epididymis due to gonococcal infection. He described anastomosing the vas to a cut end of the epididymis using fine silver wires. This fistula technique of anastomosis remained the standard for nearly 75 years, until advances in technique and instrumentation made direct, single tubule anastomosis feasible.

In 1978, Silber first reported a technique for directly anastomosing the mucosa of the vas deferens to a single epididymal tubule.1 While this required more technical skill and magnification than the fistula technique, it allowed precise alignment of the vas and epididymal lumens, resulting in markedly improved fertility rates.

Quinby reported the first successful vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal in 1919. The anastomosis was performed over a strand of silkworm gut that was later removed. By 1948, O'Conor reported a practice survey revealing that 18% of urologists had performed a vasal anastomosis procedure at least once and that the operation was successful in up to 40% of patients.2 Various techniques have been tried since O'Conor's survey, including the use of stents and adhesive materials to improve patency rates for the macroscopic anastomosis.

The next major advance occurred when Owen3 and Silber4 separately reported their techniques for microsurgical anastomosis in 1977. Silber reported patency rates of up to 94% using the 2-layer microsurgical technique for vasal anastomosis.

Problem

Azoospermia (the absence of sperm in the ejaculate) can result from an obstructed genital tract or a failure of spermatogenesis in the testicle. Vasovasostomies are indicated for an obstruction at the level of the vas deferens, while vasoepididymostomies are used to treat epididymal obstructions. The site of obstruction can often be discerned by examination of the fluid from the vasal end or from the epididymal tubule, as described below. The goal of both procedures is to restore genital tract patency and ultimately to allow conception. These procedures are not indicated for nonobstructive causes of azoospermia.

Frequency

Vasectomy remains one of the most commonly performed operations in the United States and throughout the world. Despite careful preoperative counseling, up to 5% of the men who undergo vasectomy ultimately desire a vasovasostomy to restore fertility. The most common reason for requesting a vasovasostomy is a desire to have children with a new spouse following divorce from an original partner.

Primary genital tract obstruction occurs in 7.4% of infertile males who have not undergone a prior vasectomy. While the cause may be multifactorial (eg, including epididymal trauma, infection, congenital hypoplasia of the ductal system), a significant number of these patients are candidates for vasoepididymostomy for restoration of the patency of the seminal tract.

Etiology

Causes of vasal and epididymal obstruction are outlined in Table 1. Vasal obstruction is usually the result of an intentional division for sterilization, although it occasionally may be caused by iatrogenic injury during surgical procedures (eg, herniorrhaphies).

Table 1. Surgically Correctable Causes of Ductal ...

Table 1. Surgically Correctable Causes of Ductal Obstruction

Table 1. Surgically Correctable Causes of Ductal ...

Table 1. Surgically Correctable Causes of Ductal Obstruction

An epididymal obstruction can be congenital or can result from an epididymal infection, trauma, or prior vasectomy. Congenital epididymal obstruction may occur in conjunction with atresia of the vas deferens, rendering surgical reconstruction impossible. This is usually associated with a cystic fibrosis genetic mutation, and these men may have no other phenotypic manifestations of cystic fibrosis. Some of these patients have a normal vas deferens and dysjunction of the vas deferens with the epididymis, and they may benefit from vasoepididymostomy.

Inflammatory obstruction of the epididymis can result from bacterial epididymitis. Neisseria gonorrhoeae usually affects only the distal epididymis, allowing a surgical bypass of the vas to the more proximal epididymis using a vasoepididymostomy.

Trauma to the epididymis is a relatively uncommon cause of an epididymal obstruction but may result from epididymal injury during scrotal surgeries (eg, spermatocelectomy, hydrocelectomy, testis biopsy).

An epididymal obstruction following vasectomy is the most likely cause of an epididymal obstruction. The buildup of high intraluminal pressures within the epididymis after a vasectomy can result in rupture of the delicate epididymal tubule, resulting in obstruction (eg, epididymal blowout). This phenomenon is more common in men who desire a reversal more than 10 years after their vasectomy and in patients in whom vasovasostomy has previously failed.

Presentation

Patients who desire vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal self-refer for evaluation. All other patients present for an evaluation of infertility after a trial of unprotected intercourse. A careful physical examination suggests the diagnosis of vasal or epididymal obstruction that is amenable to a vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy, respectively. Men with a genital tract obstruction have testes of normal size (>20 mL volume or 4 cm length) and consistency. The epididymis feels prominent proximal to a site of obstruction and feels flat (empty) distal to an obstructed tubule. Dilatation of the entire epididymis suggests an obstruction at either the junction of the epididymis with the vas deferens or in the vas deferens itself.

Indications

The indications for a vasovasostomy include vasectomy reversal and relief of postvasectomy pain syndrome. The latter indication is uncommon and remains of controversial efficacy. Prior to undertaking a vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal, the female partner should be evaluated by a gynecologist to exclude concurrent female causes of infertility. A vasoepididymostomy is performed for the treatment of a genital tract obstruction at the level of the epididymis.

Both vasal and epididymal obstruction are suggested by azoospermia in the presence of a normal semen volume. Low-volume azoospermia (<1.5 mL) is more suggestive of ejaculatory duct obstruction than vasal or epididymal obstruction. Patients must have active sperm production in the testes to be considered a candidate for a vasoepididymostomy. For this reason, a testis biopsy is usually performed at the time of or prior to planned reconstruction to document active spermatogenesis. The authors prefer to conduct a biopsy at the time of reconstruction, as this avoids the inevitable scarring that can further complicate reconstruction at a later date.

Relevant Anatomy

To understand the surgical bypass procedures needed to restore sperm flow, it is important to understand the basic anatomy and physiology of the seminal tract. Sperm is produced and then released into the seminiferous tubules. The sperm transits through the rete testis, efferent duct, and into the epididymal tubule.

Sperm is produced in the seminiferous tubules and...

Sperm is produced in the seminiferous tubules and then transits through the rete testis, through the efferent duct, and into the epididymal tubule. Image reprinted with permission from Cleveland Clinic.

Sperm is produced in the seminiferous tubules and...

Sperm is produced in the seminiferous tubules and then transits through the rete testis, through the efferent duct, and into the epididymal tubule. Image reprinted with permission from Cleveland Clinic.


Epididymis

The epididymis consists of a single, highly convoluted tubule that is covered with tunica vaginalis. By convention, the epididymis is divided into the following anatomic segments: (1) the caput (head), (2) the corpora (body), and (3) the cauda (tail).

The proximal epididymis is involved in sperm maturation, whereas the distal region is the area of sperm storage. Vasoepididymal anastomosis to the more proximal epididymal tubule results in lower pregnancy rates because they bypass a region of vital importance for sperm development.

Vas deferens

At the terminal end of the epididymis, a thick muscle wall that forms the proximal end of the vas deferens surrounds the tubule. The vas deferens follows the spermatic cord, courses through the inguinal canal, and enters the pelvis via the internal inguinal ring. From the pelvis, the vas travels behind the bladder and enters the prostate posteriorly. Contraction of the muscular wall of the vas deferens serves to propel sperm from the epididymis into the prostatic urethra via the ejaculatory ducts.

More on Vasovasostomy and Vasoepididymostomy

Overview: Vasovasostomy and Vasoepididymostomy
Workup: Vasovasostomy and Vasoepididymostomy
Treatment: Vasovasostomy and Vasoepididymostomy
Follow-up: Vasovasostomy and Vasoepididymostomy
Multimedia: Vasovasostomy and Vasoepididymostomy
References

References

  1. Silber SJ. Microscopic vasoepididymostomy: specific microanastomosis to the epididymal tubule. Fertil Steril. Nov 1978;30(5):565-71. [Medline].

  2. O'Conor VJ. Anastomosis of vas deferens after purposeful division for sterility. J Am Med Assoc. Jan 17 1948;136(3):162. [Medline].

  3. Owen ER. Microsurgical vasovasostomy: a reliable vasectomy reversal. Aust N Z J Surg. Jun 1977;47(3):305-9. [Medline].

  4. Silber SJ. Perfect anatomical reconstruction of vas deferens with a new microscopic surgical technique. Fertil Steril. Jan 1977;28(1):72-7. [Medline].

  5. Dewire DM, Thomas AJ. Microsurgical end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. In: Goldstein M, ed. Surgery of Male Infertility. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1995:128-34.

  6. Belker AM, Thomas AJ Jr, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol. Mar 1991;145(3):505-11. [Medline].

  7. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. Jul 4 1992;340(8810):17-8. [Medline].

  8. Kolettis PN, Thomas AJ Jr. Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol. Aug 1997;158(2):467-70. [Medline].

  9. Berardinucci D, Zini A, Jarvi K. Outcome of microsurgical reconstruction in men with suspected epididymal obstruction. J Urol. Mar 1998;159(3):831-4. [Medline].

  10. Boorjian S, Lipkin M, Goldstein M. The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. J Urol. Jan 2004;171(1):304-6. [Medline].

  11. Fogdestam I, Fall M, Nilsson S. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy in the treatment of occlusive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. Nov 1986;46(5):925-9. [Medline].

  12. Hernandez J, Sabanegh ES. Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success. J Urol. Apr 1999;161(4):1153-6. [Medline].

  13. Kolettis PN. Restructuring reconstructive techniques--advances in reconstructive techniques. Urol Clin North Am. May 2008;35(2):229-34, viii-ix. [Medline].

  14. Marmar JL. Management of the epididymal tubule during an end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol. Jul 1995;154(1):93-6. [Medline].

  15. Martin E, Carnett JB, Levi JV. The surgical treatment of sterility due to obstruction at the epididymis. Together with a study of the morphology of human spermatozoa. Medical Bulletin: University of Pennsylvania. 1903;15:2.

  16. Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. Nov 2005;174(5):1926-31; discussion 1931. [Medline].

  17. Parekattil SJ, Kuang W, Agarwal A, Thomas AJ. Model to predict if a vasoepididymostomy will be required for vasectomy reversal. J Urol. May 2005;173(5):1681-4. [Medline].

  18. Patel SR, Sigman M. Comparison of outcomes of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted and straight vas deferens. J Urol. Jan 2008;179(1):256-9. [Medline].

  19. Pierpaoli S, Mulhall JP. Vasectomy reversal in the age of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Curr Opin Urol. Nov 1998;8(6):531-4. [Medline].

  20. Shin D, Chuang WW, Lipshultz LI. Vasovasostomy. BJU Int. Jun 2004;93(9):1363-78. [Medline].

  21. Sigman M. The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy. J Urol. Jan 2004;171(1):307-9. [Medline].

  22. Silber SJ. Epididymal extravasation following vasectomy as a cause for failure of vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril. Mar 1979;31(3):309-15. [Medline].

  23. Thomas AJ. Vasoepididymostomy. In: Thomas AJ, Nagler HM, eds. Atlas of Surgical Management of Male Infertility. New York: Igaku-Shoin; 1995:62-70.

  24. Thomas AJ Jr. Vasoepididymostomy. Urol Clin North Am. Aug 1987;14(3):527-38. [Medline].

  25. Vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril. Nov 2006;86(5 Suppl):S268-71. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

vasovasostomy, vasoepididymostomy, vas deferens, fertility, postvasectomy pain syndrome, vasectomy reversal, iatrogenic vasal injury, epididymal blowout, epididymal infection, vasal anastomosis, azoospermia, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N gonorrhoeae, genital tract obstruction, epididymis, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, ICSI

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Edmund S Sabanegh Jr, MD, Director, Center for Male Fertility, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Edmund S Sabanegh Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association, Society for the Study of Male Reproduction, Society of Reproductive Surgeons, and Southwest Oncology Group
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Mary K Samplaski, MD, Staff Physician, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Mary K Samplaski, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association and American Urological Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

CME Editor

J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS, David A Bloom Professor of Urology, Director of Division of Minimally Invasive Urology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan
J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Catholic Medical Association, Endourological Society, Society for Urology and Engineering, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, and Society of Urologic Oncology
Disclosure: Terumo Corporation Consulting fee Consulting; Gyrus-ACMI Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Chief Editor

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, University of Tennessee Medical Center
Edward David Kim, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association, and Tennessee Medical Association
Disclosure: Lilly Consulting fee Consulting; Astellas Consulting fee Speaking and teaching; Indevus Consulting fee Speaking and teaching

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.