eMedicine Specialties > Urology > Cancer, Prostate

Prostate Cancer - Cryotherapy: Treatment

Author: Matthew R Cooperberg, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Peter Carroll, MD, FACS, Chair, Professor, Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco; Katsuto Shinohara, MD, Associate Adjunct Professor, Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco; Consulting Surgeon, Urology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Apr 27, 2009

Treatment

Medical Therapy

A large prostate volume (>50 cm3) can lower the technical feasibility of complete cryoablation. For example, neoadjuvant androgen ablation with a 3-month depot injection of a luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone agonist usually reduces the prostate to 60-70% of its original size. Androgen ablation may also reduce the tumor burden in patients with stage T3 disease (ie, gross extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle involvement).

In the setting of interstitial radiotherapy (brachytherapy), neoadjuvant androgen ablation has indeed been shown to effectively reduce prostate size, although it does not affect oncologic outcomes but does diminish quality-of-life outcomes, particularly in terms of potency rates.30,31 Neoadjuvant androgen ablation has not been prospectively evaluated in the context of cryotherapy; however, in a subset analysis of retrospective series, it has not been shown to improve outcomes.32 Indeed, in one large analysis, subjects receiving neoadjuvant therapy had worse biochemical outcomes than those receiving cryotherapy alone, although those in the neoadjuvant group also had more aggressive tumor characteristics on average.33

Surgical Therapy

Patients at high risk for lymph node metastasis who are contemplating cryosurgery but have negative findings on cross-sectional imaging studies may undergo regional lymphadenectomy, as identification of lymph node metastases is a relative contraindication for aggressive local therapy for prostate cancer. Lymphadenectomy may be performed laparoscopically or via a minilaparotomy with low morbidity. Significant risk factors for lymph node metastases, such as a PSA level of more than 20 ng/mL or a Gleason score of 8-10, predict failure after any local treatment, even if resected lymph nodes prove to be free of disease.

Preoperative Details

Before cryotherapy is performed, patients undergo a light bowel preparation consisting of oral magnesium citrate on the day before treatment and an enema the morning before treatment.

Intraoperative Details

Cryosurgery may be performed with the patient under general or regional anesthesia. After anesthesia is induced, the patient is placed in a lithotomy position. A Councill-tip urethral catheter is placed, and the bladder is distended with saline to displace the peritoneal contents from the treatment area. A TRUS probe is inserted into the rectum, and the anatomic configuration of the prostate and tumor, if ultrasonically identifiable, is confirmed.

Until recently, cryotherapy technique used relatively large cannulae requiring prior tract dilation. Hollow, diamond-tipped, 18-gauge needles were placed into the prostate transperineally under TRUS guidance. Six needles were placed bilaterally in the anteromedial, posterolateral, and posteromedial regions. (All needles must be placed at least 8 mm from the urethra.) Once all needles were positioned, each was passed with a 0.038 J-tip guidewire to the proximal extent of the prostatic capsule, after which the needle was removed. The tract was then dilated over the wire, a 12F cannula was placed, and the wire was removed.

Modern third-generation cryotherapy systems (eg, Galil [Galil Medical USA; Woburn, Mass], CRYOcare [Endocare; Irvine, Calif]) use smaller, needle-shaped probes, which can be placed percutaneously, directly into the prostate without dilation. Up to 30 such probes may be placed to achieve a more uniform freezing pattern, as is displayed in the image below.9,16 In the future, computer software systems currently under development will most likely facilitate both preoperative planning and real-time monitoring of progression of therapy.34

Example of third-generation prostate cryotherapy ...

Example of third-generation prostate cryotherapy setup, illustrating urethral warming catheter, 2 percutaneous temperature probes, and 3 cryotherapy probes. (This case was a salvage case of focal treatment for an ultrasonographically visible lesion, so only 3 cryoprobes were required.)

Example of third-generation prostate cryotherapy ...

Example of third-generation prostate cryotherapy setup, illustrating urethral warming catheter, 2 percutaneous temperature probes, and 3 cryotherapy probes. (This case was a salvage case of focal treatment for an ultrasonographically visible lesion, so only 3 cryoprobes were required.)


Thermosensors are placed, as shown below, either through additional 18-gauge needles or via direct puncture, to monitor the temperature at the apex, at the external sphincter, along the Denonvilliers aponeurosis, and at the edge of the tumor. The Councill-tip urethral catheter is exchanged over a guidewire for a urethral warmer. Warm saline irrigation is started through the warmer.

Transrectal sonogram of the prostate illustrating...

Transrectal sonogram of the prostate illustrating placement of the cryoprobes and urethral-warming catheter.

Transrectal sonogram of the prostate illustrating...

Transrectal sonogram of the prostate illustrating placement of the cryoprobes and urethral-warming catheter.


With modern cryotherapy systems, each cryoprobe may be fixed in place by freezing each to -10°C to create a small ice ball; this step may be omitted if a perineal template is used. Ice within the prostate casts a dense acoustic shadow, obscuring all anatomic detail anterior to the ice; therefore, the anterior probes must be activated first.

Transrectal sonogram of the prostate during cryoa...

Transrectal sonogram of the prostate during cryoablation. The leading edge of the ice ball, growing posteriorly, is echodense and casts a dark acoustic shadow anteriorly.

Transrectal sonogram of the prostate during cryoa...

Transrectal sonogram of the prostate during cryoablation. The leading edge of the ice ball, growing posteriorly, is echodense and casts a dark acoustic shadow anteriorly.


The anterior ice balls are extended posteriorly and laterally, including a 2- to 4-mm margin into the lateral periprostatic tissues and beyond the apex. If tumor extracapsular extension is suspected, the ice is propagated further laterally on the involved side. In addition to continuous TRUS monitoring, the thermosensors are monitored to ensure that the target tissue temperature is reduced uniformly to at least -40°C to ensure complete tissue necrosis. Recent in vitro data suggest that the rapidity of freezing increases cytotoxicity within the ice ball margin and reduces damage beyond it.35

Diagram illustrating dimensions of a typical ice ...

Diagram illustrating dimensions of a typical ice ball as seen end-on (left) and from the side (right).

Diagram illustrating dimensions of a typical ice ...

Diagram illustrating dimensions of a typical ice ball as seen end-on (left) and from the side (right).


The anterior probes are then thawed with helium, and the posterior probes are activated. The posterior ice balls are extended into, but not beyond, the rectal muscularis propria. If the apex is inadequately frozen, the probe may be withdrawn toward the apex and reactivated. If seminal vesicle involvement is considered likely, an additional probe may be placed into the seminal vesicle. Two freeze-thaw cycles are performed; 2-cycle therapy has been proven in vivo to result in more complete coagulative necrosis than a single cycle and achieves killing at a critical temperature of -41°C (-41.8°F) rather than the -62°C (-79.6°F) required for a single cycle.36

Transrectal sonogram illustrating the ice ball no...

Transrectal sonogram illustrating the ice ball now extending posteriorly to the muscularis propria of the rectum. All prostate tissue is now included within the margin of the ice ball.

Transrectal sonogram illustrating the ice ball no...

Transrectal sonogram illustrating the ice ball now extending posteriorly to the muscularis propria of the rectum. All prostate tissue is now included within the margin of the ice ball.


After the second cycle, the cryoprobes and/or cannulae are removed, and, if large-bore cannulae were used, the perineal insertion sites are closed with 4-0 chromic suture. The urethral warmer remains in place until all thawing is complete; it is then exchanged for a Foley catheter, or a suprapubic tube is placed.

The following technical measures were explicitly recommended by the AUA Best Practice Statement panel:12

  • Use of rapid freezing for better tissue destruction
  • Use of thermocouples for temperature monitoring
  • Freezing to -40°C
  • Use of passive (slow) thawing
  • Use of a double freeze-thaw cycle

Postoperative Details

Cryotherapy is usually performed in an outpatient setting. A urethral catheter is left in place for 3 weeks following treatment to minimize the likelihood of tissue sloughing and urinary retention. Urinary retention after cryotherapy is quite common because of local urethral edema. Some investigators have reported leaving the urethral warming catheter in place for several hours after the procedure in an attempt to minimize injury to the urethra,37 but this maneuver has not been well studied.

Follow-up

Routinely evaluate the patient after cryotherapy to assess for the development of late complications and to assess for symptoms or signs of clinical recurrence. Monitor the PSA level at regular intervals.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Prostate Health Center and Cancer and Tumors Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Prostate Cancer.

Complications

Impotence

Cryotherapy impairs the penile arterial blood supply38 and damages the cavernosal nerves responsible for erectile function.39 This combined neurovascular insult results in impotence in 40-100% of treated patients,40 depending on such factors as the use of multiple freeze-thaw cycles, the size of the ice ball generated, preoperative potency, the instruments used to assess potency, and the follow-up interval since treatment. Greater nerve regeneration is possible after cryotherapy than after surgery or radiation therapy; accordingly, some patients have reportedly recovered erectile function up to 2 years after treatment. One report indicated that 95% of subjects who were potent before cryotherapy became impotent and that 5% regained their potency at a mean of 16 months.40

A pooled analysis of 975 patients treated at 5 institutions from 1993-1998 revealed an impotence rate of 93%.33 However, another report indicated that, 3 years after cryoablation, 5 (13%) of 38 subjects had regained potency and 13 (34%) were potent with the help of erectile aids.41 In a large recent series, Jones et al noted that, of patients potent at the time of therapy (29.5% of the cohort), only 25% returned to intercourse posttreatment, and only 8.8% without the use of medications or other assistance.42

Aggressive penile rehabilitation has a growing place in the management of erectile function after prostatectomy and may also have a role after cryotherapy. For example, Ellis et al reported that a penile rehabilitation program resulted in recovery of erectile function following cryotherapy in 41% of patients at 1 year and 51% at 4 years.43 Nonetheless, postprocedural potency is the quality-of-life domain for which cryotherapy remains clearly inferior to other local treatment modalities for prostate cancer. Until the return-of-potency rate improves, the risk of impotence will likely continue to be an impediment to wider use of cryotherapy among patients in whom erectile function is important.

One group of investigators has studied a method of nerve-sparing cryotherapy in a canine model by using active helium-based warming of the neurovascular bundles during freezing of the prostate. Unfortunately, nerve preservation was not completely reproducible; moreover, the warming also resulted in incomplete ablation of prostatic tissue adjacent to the nerves.44

Incontinence

As with impotence, reported rates of incontinence depend greatly on the definitions of continence and the methods of assessment. These rates vary from 4%45 to 27%46 in patients undergoing cryotherapy as primary treatment. Among the largest single series of patients who underwent primary cryotherapy, 4.3% required at least one urinary pad per day, and 11.6% had lesser degrees of incontinence40 ; Long et al reported a 7.5% incontinence rate.33

Among patients undergoing cryotherapy for salvage treatment after failure of radiation therapy, the prevalence of incontinence is higher, ranging from 7.9%47 to 95.5%,48 with rates of 20%23 to 73%18 in the largest series. In the Chin et al study, one third of the patients reporting incontinence had near-total or total incontinence.23 In a recent review of complications of cryotherapy, the rates of incontinence among patients treated with modern technique and equipment were estimated to be 5% for primary therapy and 10% for salvage therapy.49

Tissue sloughing

Cryosurgery induces necrosis in the treated prostate tissue. If the urethra freezes during treatment, its mucosal barrier fails, thus exposing the necrotic prostate tissue to the urinary tract and a risk of infection. This tissue may then slough into the urethra (typically, 3-8 wk posttreatment), producing irritative and obstructive voiding symptoms, pyuria, and, possibly, urinary retention. The use of urethral warming devices significantly reduces the risk of this complication. One series reported a reduction from 85% to 37%.50 In another report, urethral warming reduced the rate of sloughing causing obstruction from 54% to 14%.51

Data from a pooled analysis likewise revealed obstruction requiring TURP in 10% of patients undergoing urethral warming via an approved catheter versus 44% in other patients.33 In contemporary series, the overall rate of sloughing has ranged from 3.8-23% in patients receiving primary cryotherapy52,53,54 and from 5-44% in those undergoing salvage treatment.18,37 In a recent large series of salvage cryotherapy, transurethral resection of sloughed tissue was necessary in 3.2% of patients.55

Conservative treatment includes antibiotics and urinary drainage; continuous intermittent self-catheterization may help dislodge obstructing tissue. In some cases, transurethral removal or resection of necrotic tissue may be required. Nearly 50% of patients requiring transurethral resection after cryotherapy develop incontinence14 ; therefore, resection must be as limited as possible.

Pelvic and rectal pain

One to 11% of patients receiving primary cryotherapy56,46,54 and 21-77% of those receiving salvage therapy for radiation failure48,18 report pelvic and/or rectal pain. The etiology of this pain is unclear but may include rectal wall ischemia, freezing of the pelvic floor musculature and/or pubic bone, or extravasation of urine into the periprostatic tissues. Urinoma or abscess must be excluded in these patients. The pain is best managed with anti-inflammatory medications.

Penile numbness

In early studies, approximately 10% of patients treated with cryotherapy developed penile numbness attributable to injury to the dorsal nerve of the penis. This injury was attributed to cryotrauma to the pudendal nerve associated with excessive freezing of the anterior probes. This complication was usually temporary, resolving spontaneously in approximately 2-3 months.14

Rectourethral fistula

Complete freezing of tissues posterior to the prostate, with urinary extravasation and possible subsequent infection, can lead to fistula formation, which is reported in 0%52,57 to 3%46 of primary cryotherapy patients. In their series of 590 cases, Bahn et al reported only 2 cases of fistula formation40 ; Long et al, likewise, reported a 0.5% rate of fistula formation among 975 patients,33 and Jones et al reported a 0.4% rate among 1198 patients who underwent cryosurgery as primary therapy.42 Rates may be higher among salvage patients—up to 11% in one report.57 In one large series of salvage cases, however, only 4 cases were reported among 118 patients23 ; among 279 salvage patients recently reported, the fistula rate was 1.2%.55

Rectourethral fistula may not develop until several months after treatment. Patients typically present with watery diarrhea or pneumaturia. Diagnosis is confirmed with voiding cystourethrography or CT scanning. Conservative treatment consists of Foley catheter drainage, possibly facilitated by fistula tract fulguration. Any formal fistula repair (eg, a repair involving a muscle transposition flap) should be delayed 4-6 months to allow the inflammatory process to subside and should involve a multidisciplinary approach that includes colorectal surgeons and urologists.49

Urethral stricture

Urethral stricture results from extensive tissue sloughing, usually at the bladder neck. This is a rare complication when urethral warming is used and can usually be successfully managed with transurethral incision or balloon dilation.

Hydronephrosis

Hydronephrosis, attributed to cryoinjury of the ureteral orifice or distal ureter as a result of deep seminal vesical or bladder neck freezing, has been reported in 0-36% of subjects undergoing salvage cryotherapy for recurrence after radiotherapy.48,18 This complication can usually be avoided by careful TRUS monitoring of the trigone and ureteral orifices during treatment.

Small-bowel obstruction

In one series, only 1 of 176 subjects developed a bowel obstruction following cryotherapy. This result was attributed to ice-ball extension into the peritoneal cul-de-sac. Such extension is usually preventable by identification of the cul-de-sac on TRUS images and by distention of the bladder before the procedure in order to displace the peritoneal contents.32

More on Prostate Cancer - Cryotherapy

Overview: Prostate Cancer - Cryotherapy
Workup: Prostate Cancer - Cryotherapy
Treatment: Prostate Cancer - Cryotherapy
Follow-up: Prostate Cancer - Cryotherapy
Multimedia: Prostate Cancer - Cryotherapy
References

References

  1. Arnott J. On the treatment of cancer by the regulated application of an anesthetic temperature. London, England: Churchill; 1851.

  2. Cooper IS, Hirose T. Application of cryogenic surgery to resection of parenchymal organs. N Engl J Med. Jan 6 1966;274(1):15-8. [Medline].

  3. Gonder MJ, Soanes WA, Shulman S. Cryosurgical treatment of the prostate. Invest Urol. Jan 1966;3(4):372-8. [Medline].

  4. Soanes WA, Gonder MJ. Use of cryosurgery in prostatic cancer. J Urol. Jun 1968;99(6):793-7. [Medline].

  5. Megalli MR, Gursel EO, Veenema RJ. Closed perineal cryosurgery in prostatic cancer. New probe and technique. Urology. Aug 1974;4(2):220-2. [Medline].

  6. Onik GM, Cohen JK, Reyes GD, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided percutaneous radical cryosurgical ablation of the prostate. Cancer. Aug 15 1993;72(4):1291-9. [Medline].

  7. Saliken JC, Donnelly BJ, Rewcastle JC. The evolution and state of modern technology for prostate cryosurgery. Urology. Aug 2002;60(2 Suppl 1):26-33. [Medline].

  8. De La Taille A, Benson MC, Bagiella E, et al. Cryoablation for clinically localized prostate cancer using an argon-based system: complication rates and biochemical recurrence. BJU Int. Feb 2000;85(3):281-6. [Medline].

  9. Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Cohen JK, Belldegrun AS. Prostate cryoablation using direct transperineal placement of ultrathin probes through a 17-gauge brachytherapy template-technique and preliminary results. Urology. Dec 2001;58(6):988-93. [Medline].

  10. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Meng MV, et al. The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J Clin Oncol. Jun 1 2004;22(11):2141-9. [Medline].

  11. O'Leary MP, Baum NH, Blizzard R, et al. 2001 American Urological Association Gallup Survey: changes in physician practice patterns, satisfaction with urology, and treatment of prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. J Urol. Aug 2002;168(2):649-52. [Medline].

  12. Babaian RJ, Donnelly B, Bahn D, Baust JG, Dineen M, Ellis D, et al. Best practice statement on cryosurgery for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Urol. Nov 2008;180(5):1993-2004. [Medline].

  13. Izawa JI, Busby JE, Morganstern N, Vakar-Lopez F, Scott SM, Pisters LL. Histological changes in prostate biopsies after salvage cryotherapy: effect of chronology and the method of biopsy. BJU Int. Sep 2006;98(3):554-8. [Medline].

  14. Shinohara K, Connolly JA, Presti JC, Carroll PR. Cryosurgical treatment of localized prostate cancer (stages T1 to T4): preliminary results. J Urol. Jul 1996;156(1):115-20; discussion 120-1. [Medline].

  15. Hoffmann NE, Bischof JC. The cryobiology of cryosurgical injury. Urology. Aug 2002;60(2 Suppl 1):40-9. [Medline].

  16. Han KR, Belldegrun AS. Third-generation cryosurgery for primary and recurrent prostate cancer. BJU Int. Jan 2004;93(1):14-8. [Medline].

  17. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Comparative Effectiveness of Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/healthInfo.cfm?infotype=rr&ProcessID=9&DocID=79. Accessed January 19, 2009.

  18. Pisters LL, von Eschenbach AC, Scott SM, et al. The efficacy and complications of salvage cryotherapy of the prostate. J Urol. Mar 1997;157(3):921-5. [Medline].

  19. Grado GL, Collins JM, Kriegshauser JS, et al. Salvage brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer after radiotherapy failure. Urology. Jan 1999;53(1):2-10. [Medline].

  20. Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Pontes JE. Salvage radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. Aug 2001;28(3):545-53. [Medline].

  21. Reckwitz T, Potter SR, Partin AW. Prediction of locoregional extension and metastatic disease in prostate cancer: a review. World J Urol. Jun 2000;18(3):165-72. [Medline].

  22. Oesterling JE. Using PSA to eliminate the staging radionuclide bone scan. Significant economic implications. Urol Clin North Am. Nov 1993;20(4):705-11. [Medline].

  23. Chin JL, Pautler SE, Mouraviev V, et al. Results of salvage cryoablation of the prostate after radiation: identifying predictors of treatment failure and complications. J Urol. Jun 2001;165(6 Pt 1):1937-41; discussion 1941-2. [Medline].

  24. O'Dowd GJ, Veltri RW, Orozco R, et al. Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. J Urol. Sep 1997;158(3 Pt 1):687-98. [Medline].

  25. Matlaga BR, Eskew LA, McCullough DL. Prostate biopsy: indications and technique. J Urol. Jan 2003;169(1):12-9. [Medline].

  26. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. Mar 2000;18(6):1164-72. [Medline].

  27. Freedland SJ, Csathy GS, Dorey F, Aronson WJ. Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score. J Urol. Feb 2002;167(2 Pt 1):516-20. [Medline].

  28. Grossfeld GD, Latini DM, Lubeck DP, et al. Predicting disease recurrence in intermediate and high-risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using percent positive biopsies: results from CaPSURE. Urology. Apr 2002;59(4):560-5. [Medline].

  29. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol. Jan 1974;111(1):58-64. [Medline].

  30. Potters L, Torre T, Fearn PA, et al. Potency after permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Aug 1 2001;50(5):1235-42. [Medline].

  31. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sandler HM, et al. Comprehensive comparison of health-related quality of life after contemporary therapies for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. Jan 15 2002;20(2):557-66. [Medline].

  32. Koppie TM, Shinohara K, Grossfeld GD, et al. The efficacy of cryosurgical ablation of prostate cancer: the University of California, San Francisco experience. J Urol. Aug 1999;162(2):427-32. [Medline].

  33. Long JP, Bahn D, Lee F, et al. Five-year retrospective, multi-institutional pooled analysis of cancer-related outcomes after cryosurgical ablation of the prostate. Urology. Mar 2001;57(3):518-23. [Medline].

  34. Wojtowicz A, Selman S, Jankun J. Computer simulation of prostate cryoablation--fast and accurate approximation of the exact solution. Comput Aided Surg. 2003;8(2):91-7. [Medline].

  35. Yang WH, Liao ST, Shen SY, Chang HC. The speed of ice growth as an important indicator in cryosurgery. J Urol. Jul 2004;172(1):345-8. [Medline].

  36. Larson TR, Robertson DW, Corica A, Bostwick DG. In vivo interstitial temperature mapping of the human prostate during cryosurgery with correlation to histopathologic outcomes. Urology. Apr 2000;55(4):547-52. [Medline].

  37. De La Taille A, Hayek O, Benson MC, et al. Salvage cryotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: the Columbia experience. Urology. Jan 2000;55(1):79-84. [Medline].

  38. Aboseif S, Shinohara K, Borirakchanyavat S, et al. The effect of cryosurgical ablation of the prostate on erectile function. Br J Urol. Dec 1997;80(6):918-22. [Medline].

  39. El-Sakka AI, Hassan MU, Selph C, et al. Effect of cavernous nerve freezing on protein and gene expression of nitric oxide synthase in the rat penis and pelvic ganglia. J Urol. Dec 1998;160(6 Pt 1):2245-52. [Medline].

  40. Bahn DK, Lee F, Badalament R, et al. Targeted cryoablation of the prostate: 7-year outcomes in the primary treatment of prostate cancer. Urology. Aug 2002;60(2 Suppl 1):3-11. [Medline].

  41. Robinson JW, Donnelly BJ, Saliken JC, et al. Quality of life and sexuality of men with prostate cancer 3 years after cryosurgery. Urology. Aug 2002;60(2 Suppl 1):12-8. [Medline].

  42. Jones JS, Rewcastle JC, Donnelly BJ, Lugnani FM, Pisters LL, Katz AE. Whole gland primary prostate cryoablation: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry. J Urol. Aug 2008;180(2):554-8. [Medline].

  43. Ellis DS, Manny TB Jr, Rewcastle JC. Cryoablation as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer followed by penile rehabilitation. Urology. Feb 2007;69(2):306-10. [Medline].

  44. Janzen NK, Han KR, Perry KT, Said JW, Schulam PG, Belldegrun AS. Feasibility of nerve-sparing prostate cryosurgery: applications and limitations in a canine model. J Endourol. May 2005;19(4):520-5. [Medline].

  45. Cohen JK, Miller RJ, Rooker GM, Shuman BA. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: two-year prostate-specific antigen and biopsy results. Urology. Mar 1996;47(3):395-401. [Medline].

  46. Cox RL, Crawford ED. Complications of cryosurgical ablation of the prostate to treat localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urology. Jun 1995;45(6):932-5. [Medline].

  47. Ghafar MA, Johnson CW, De La Taille A, et al. Salvage cryotherapy using an argon based system for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: the Columbia experience. J Urol. Oct 2001;166(4):1333-7; discussion 1337-8. [Medline].

  48. Bales GT, Williams MJ, Sinner M, et al. Short-term outcomes after cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in men with recurrent prostate carcinoma following radiation therapy. Urology. Nov 1995;46(5):676-80. [Medline].

  49. Ahmed S, Davies J. Managing the complications of prostate cryosurgery. BJU Int. Mar 2005;95(4):480-1. [Medline].

  50. Wong WS, Chinn DO, Chinn M, et al. Cryosurgery as a treatment for prostate carcinoma: results and complications. Cancer. Mar 1 1997;79(5):963-74. [Medline].

  51. Cespedes RD, Pisters LL, von Eschenbach AC, McGuire EJ. Long-term followup of incontinence and obstruction after salvage cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: results in 143 patients. J Urol. Jan 1997;157(1):237-40. [Medline].

  52. Wieder J, Schmidt JD, Casola G, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal cryoablation in the treatment of prostate carcinoma: preliminary results. J Urol. Aug 1995;154(2 Pt 1):435-41. [Medline].

  53. Shinohara K, Rhee B, Presti JC, Carroll PR. Cryosurgical ablation of prostate cancer: patterns of cancer recurrence. J Urol. Dec 1997;158(6):2206-9; discussion 2209-10. [Medline].

  54. Han KR, Cohen JK, Miller RJ, et al. Treatment of organ confined prostate cancer with third generation cryosurgery: preliminary multicenter experience. J Urol. Oct 2003;170(4 Pt 1):1126-30. [Medline].

  55. Pisters LL, Rewcastle JC, Donnelly BJ, Lugnani FM, Katz AE, Jones JS. Salvage prostate cryoablation: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry. J Urol. Aug 2008;180(2):559-63. [Medline].

  56. Coogan CL, McKiel CF. Percutaneous cryoablation of the prostate: preliminary results after 95 procedures. J Urol. Nov 1995;154(5):1813-7. [Medline].

  57. Long JP, Fallick ML, LaRock DR, Rand W. Preliminary outcomes following cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. J Urol. Feb 1998;159(2):477-84. [Medline].

  58. Bahn DK, Lee F, Solomon MH, et al. Prostate cancer: US-guided percutaneous cryoablation. Work in progress. Radiology. Feb 1995;194(2):551-6. [Medline].

  59. Wake RW, Hollabaugh RS, Bond KH. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate for localized adenocarcinoma: a preliminary experience. J Urol. May 1996;155(5):1663-6. [Medline].

  60. Chin JL, Touma N, Pautler SE, et al. Serial histopathology results of salvage cryoablation for prostate cancer after radiation failure. J Urol. Oct 2003;170(4 Pt 1):1199-202. [Medline].

  61. Connolly JA, Shinohara K, Presti JC Jr, Carroll PR. Should cryosurgery be considered a therapeutic option in localized prostate cancer?. Urol Clin North Am. Nov 1996;23(4):623-31. [Medline].

  62. Lee F, Bahn DK, Badalament RA, et al. Cryosurgery for prostate cancer: improved glandular ablation by use of 6 to 8 cryoprobes. Urology. Jul 1999;54(1):135-40. [Medline].

  63. Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, D'Amico AV, Dmochowski RR, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. Feb 2007;177(2):540-5. [Medline].

  64. Gretzer MB, Trock BJ, Han M, Walsh PC. A critical analysis of the interpretation of biochemical failure in surgically treated patients using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology criteria. J Urol. Oct 2002;168(4 Pt 1):1419-22. [Medline].

  65. Nielsen ME, Makarov DV, Humphreys E, Mangold L, Partin AW, Walsh PC. Is it possible to compare PSA recurrence-free survival after surgery and radiotherapy using revised ASTRO criterion--"nadir + 2"?. Urology. Aug 2008;72(2):389-93. [Medline].

  66. Ellis DS. Cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: a community hospital experience. Urology. Aug 2002;60(2 Suppl 1):34-9. [Medline].

  67. Prepelica KL, Okeke Z, Murphy A, Katz AE. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: high risk patient outcomes. Cancer. Apr 15 2005;103(8):1625-30. [Medline].

  68. Roach M 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H Jr, Schellhammer P, Shipley WU, Sokol GH, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jul 15 2006;65(4):965-74. [Medline].

  69. Miller RJ, Cohen JK, Merlotti LA. Percutaneous transperineal cryosurgical ablation of the prostate for the primary treatment of clinical stage C adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urology. Aug 1994;44(2):170-4. [Medline].

  70. Gould RS. Total cryosurgery of the prostate versus standard cryosurgery versus radical prostatectomy: comparison of early results and the role of transurethral resection in cryosurgery. J Urol. Nov 1999;162(5):1653-7. [Medline].

  71. Cresswell J, Asterling S, Chaudhary M, Sheikh N, Greene D. Third-generation cryotherapy for prostate cancer in the UK: a prospective study of the early outcomes in primary and recurrent disease. BJU Int. May 2006;97(5):969-74. [Medline].

  72. Spiess PE, Lee AK, Leibovici D, Wang X, Do KA, Pisters LL. Presalvage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time as predictors of biochemical failure of salvage cryotherapy in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Cancer. Jul 15 2006;107(2):275-80. [Medline].

  73. Symon Z, Kundel Y, Sadetzki S, Oberman B, Ramon J, Laufer M. Radiation rescue for biochemical failure after surgery for prostate cancer: predictive parameters and an assessment of contemporary predictive models. Am J Clin Oncol. Oct 2006;29(5):446-50. [Medline].

  74. Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Stephenson AJ, Diblasio CJ, Fearn PA, Eastham JA. Long-term oncologic results of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jun 1 2005;62(2):448-53. [Medline].

  75. Bahn DK, Lee F, Silverman P, et al. Salvage cryosurgery for recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: a seven-year follow-up. Clin Prostate Cancer. Sep 2003;2(2):111-4. [Medline].

  76. Hahn JK, Manyak MJ, Jin G, et al. Cryotherapy simulator for localized prostate cancer. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:173-8. [Medline].

  77. Rukstalis DB, Goldknopf JL, Crowley EM, Garcia FU. Prostate cryoablation: a scientific rationale for future modifications. Urology. Aug 2002;60(2 Suppl 1):19-25. [Medline].

  78. Onik G, Narayan P, Vaughan D, et al. Focal "nerve-sparing" cryosurgery for treatment of primary prostate cancer: a new approach to preserving potency. Urology. Jul 2002;60(1):109-14. [Medline].

  79. Onik G, Vaughan D, Lotenfoe R, Dineen M, Brady J. "Male lumpectomy": focal therapy for prostate cancer using cryoablation. Urology. Dec 2007;70(6 Suppl):16-21. [Medline].

  80. Clarke DM, Baust JM, Van Buskirk RG, Baust JG. Chemo-cryo combination therapy: an adjunctive model for the treatment of prostate cancer. Cryobiology. Jun 2001;42(4):274-85. [Medline].

  81. Clarke DM, Baust JM, Van Buskirk RG, Baust JG. Addition of anticancer agents enhances freezing-induced prostate cancer cell death: implications of mitochondrial involvement. Cryobiology. Aug 2004;49(1):45-61. [Medline].

  82. Clarke DM, Robilotto AT, VanBuskirk RG, Baust JG, Gage AA, Baust JM. Targeted induction of apoptosis via TRAIL and cryoablation: a novel strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10(2):175-84. [Medline].

  83. Pham L, Dahiya R, Rubinsky B. An in vivo study of antifreeze protein adjuvant cryosurgery. Cryobiology. Mar 1999;38(2):169-75. [Medline].

  84. [Best Evidence] U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. Aug 5 2008;149(3):185-91. [Medline].

  85. Anastasiadis AG, Sachdev R, Salomon L, et al. Comparison of health-related quality of life and prostate-associated symptoms after primary and salvage cryotherapy for prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. Dec 2003;129(12):676-82. [Medline].

  86. Cohen JK, Miller RJ Jr, Ahmed S, Lotz MJ, Baust J. Ten-year biochemical disease control for patients with prostate cancer treated with cryosurgery as primary therapy. Urology. Mar 2008;71(3):515-8. [Medline].

  87. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2003;53(1):5-26. [Medline].

  88. Lam JL, Pisters LL, Belldegrun AS. Cryotherapy for prostate cancer. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2007:Ch 101.

  89. Lee F, Bahn DK, McHugh TA, et al. US-guided percutaneous cryoablation of prostate cancer. Radiology. Sep 1994;192(3):769-76. [Medline].

  90. Onik G, Cobb C, Cohen J, et al. US characteristics of frozen prostate. Radiology. Sep 1988;168(3):629-31. [Medline].

  91. Polascik TJ, Nosnik I, Mayes JM, Mouraviev V. Short-term cancer control after primary cryosurgical ablation for clinically localized prostate cancer using third-generation cryotechnology. Urology. Jul 2007;70(1):117-21. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

cryotherapy, prostate cancer, cryoablation, cryosurgery, cryoprobes, urethral warming catheters, brachytherapy, radiotherapy, radiation therapy, radical prostatectomy, systemic androgen deprivation therapy, transrectal ultrasound, TRUS, transurethral resection of the prostate, TURP, transurethral cryoablation, pelvic lymphadenectomy, neoadjuvant androgen ablation, prostate-specific antigen, PSA, benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH, erectile dysfunction, ED, impotence, potency, incontinence, continence, penile numbness, rectourethral fistula, urethral stricture, hydronephrosis, small bowel obstruction

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Matthew R Cooperberg, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine
Matthew R Cooperberg, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association and California Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Peter Carroll, MD, FACS, Chair, Professor, Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Katsuto Shinohara, MD, Associate Adjunct Professor, Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco; Consulting Surgeon, Urology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Katsuto Shinohara, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and American Urological Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Martin I Resnick, MD †, Former Lester Persky Professor and Chair, Department of Urology, Former Professor, Department of Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
Martin I Resnick, MD † is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Federation for Medical Research, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Surgical Association, American Urological Association, Association for Academic Surgery, Endocrine Society, National Kidney Foundation, Ohio Urological Society, and Pan American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS, David A Bloom Professor of Urology, Director of Division of Minimally Invasive Urology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan
J Stuart Wolf Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Urological Association, Catholic Medical Association, Endourological Society, Society for Urology and Engineering, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Society of University Urologists, and Society of Urologic Oncology
Disclosure: Terumo Corporation Consulting fee Consulting; Gyrus-ACMI Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Chief Editor

Edward David Kim, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, University of Tennessee Medical Center
Edward David Kim, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Andrology, American Urological Association, and Tennessee Medical Association
Disclosure: Lilly Consulting fee Consulting; Astellas Consulting fee Speaking and teaching; Indevus Consulting fee Speaking and teaching

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.