Retroperitoneal Fibrosis Treatment & Management
- Author: Chandra Shekhar Biyani, MS, MBBS, DUrol, FRCS(Urol), FEBU; Chief Editor: Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS more...
Optimal care in patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) requires an integrated approach of surgical and nonsurgical therapies. The aims of management are to preserve renal function, to prevent other organ involvement, to exclude malignancy, and to relieve symptoms.
The literature reports no consensus on the appropriate management of patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis because no controlled therapeutic trials have been performed. Furthermore, successful outcome has occasionally been reported with conservative therapy.[5, 6] In 2002, Pistolese et al reported partial or complete regression of retroperitoneal fibrosis associated with inflammatory aortic aneurysm after surgery. The treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis depends on the stage of the disease at diagnosis, as depicted in the image below.
Empirical therapy includes corticosteroids, tamoxifen, and azathioprine; experimental therapy includes azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate-mofetil, cyclosporin, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and progesterone. Glucocorticoids and azathioprine are most useful in patients with signs of inflammation (eg, raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or C-reactive protein level, increased white blood cell count, and positive antinuclear antibody [ANA] results).
In 1958, Ross and Tinckler first reported the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis. The beneficial effect is thought to be due to anti-inflammatory action and the ability to inhibit fibrotic tissue maturation.
A pooled analysis of nonmalignant retroperitoneal fibrosis treated with steroids revealed a satisfactory outcome. In 2002, van Bommel analyzed 147 patients and noted good results in 122 patients (83%) and recurrence in 55 patients (16%). Most recurrences were noted within 12 months, and some responded to reintroduction of steroid. Despite their proven success, using steroids as a first-line therapy in retroperitoneal fibrosis remains controversial because many clinicians believe that multiple deep biopsies are still essential to exclude malignancy.
A standard protocol is prednisolone at 40-60 mg/d tapered to 10 mg/d within 2-3 months and discontinued after 12-24 months. Timely dose reductions and cessation are important because of the adverse effects associated with long-term steroid use.
In 1994, Harreby et al used methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MPPT) at 1 g/d IV for 3 days along with azathioprine or penicillamine. This therapy was used in 11 cases of retroperitoneal fibrosis with ureteric obstruction following initial insertion of ureteral stents. The treatment was successful in 7 patients but only moderately effective in 4 patients. The combination of glucocorticoid and azathioprine is most useful in patients with signs of inflammation (raised ESR, positive ANA results, positive PET findings).
Steroids can be used in combination with surgery. In one study, concomitant use of steroids with surgery reduced the rate of ureteric restenosis from 48% to 10%. However, response may vary, and an unacceptably high dose of steroid may be required to control retroperitoneal fibrosis.
Long-term corticosteroid treatment can cause an array of adverse effects, including the following:
Increased susceptibility to infections
In 1991, Clarke et al were the first to use tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, in the treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Clinicians have subsequently reported successful treatment with tamoxifen. Various authors have used tamoxifen with a variable protocol (10-40 mg for 6 mo to 3 y).
Its mechanism of action is not entirely clear, and different hypotheses have been proposed. Tamoxifen increases the synthesis and secretion of transforming growth factor–beta (TGF-β), an inhibitory growth factor, by human fetal fibroblast in vitro. In retroperitoneal fibrosis, fibroblast and immune cells in the inflammatory mass may increase their secretion of TGF-β, which may then decrease the size of the fibrous plaque. Other possible mechanisms of action include inhibition of protein kinase C, reduction of epidermal growth factor production, inhibition of calmodulin, and blockage of growth-promoting histaminelike receptor.[49, 50]
A retrospective study by van der Bilt et al of initial treatment in 118 patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis concluded that corticosteroids are superior to tamoxifen as monotherapy. In patients who respond to initial therapy with either medication, however, those treated with tamoxifen were less likely to experience relapse.
Amelioration of symptoms after treatment initiation occurred in 2 weeks with steroids versus 4 weeks with tamoxifen (P <0.01), and mass regression at first follow-up CT scan was observed in 84.0% of steroid-treated patients versus 68.3% of those receiving tamoxifen (P = 0.05). Recurrence rate after successful initial treatment was 62.5% with steroids versus 21.4% with tamoxifen (P <0.01).
Corticosteroids also proved superior to tamoxifen for maintaining remission of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis, in a randomized, open-label, controlled trial in 40 patients (18-85 y) who had achieved remission with prednisone. Vaglio et al compared tapered prednisone (initial dose 0.5 mg/kg daily) with fixed-dose tamoxifen (0.5 mg/kg daily), both given for 8 months, and found that after 18 months, the estimated cumulative relapse probability was 17% with prednisone and 50% with tamoxifen (P=0.0372). However, cushingoid changes and grade 2 hypercholesterolemia were more common with prednisone.
Compared with steroids, the adverse effect profile of tamoxifen is low; thus, clinicians consider tamoxifen a reasonable treatment option. However, the adverse effects of tamoxifen, especially an increased risk of thromboembolism and ovarian cancer, should be carefully considered for each patient.
To block the proliferation of T cells and B cells, a combination of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroid appears to be a promising option.
Swartz et al (2008) reported their experience with high-dose corticosteroid and MMF in 21 patients. They used prednisone 60 mg or 120 mg qid for 3-6 months and tapered the dose upon clinical improvement. In addition, steroid-sparing therapy with MMF (1000 mg bid) was recommended, with discontinuation after 6-12 months of therapy.
Adler et al (2008) observed radiologic regression following therapy with MMF 2 g/d and prednisolone 1 mg/kg in 9 patients. Therapy led to removal of the ureteral catheter in 5 of 7 patients. Complications of MMF therapy included recurrent urinary infections and upper gastrointestinal disturbance.
Scheel et al (2011) reported benefit in a prospective case series of 28 patients treated with MMF (1000 mg bid) and Prednisone, 40 mg/d, tapered over 6 months, for a mean of 24.3 months. In all patients, systemic symptoms resolved, and elevated ESR and serum creatinine level and decreased hemoglobin level normalized. Periaortic mass decreased by 25% or more in 89% of patients. Disease recurred in two patients.
Azathioprine has been used when steroid therapy has failed and as a steroid-sparing drug. Cogan and Fastrez used a 6-week course of azathioprine (150 mg/d) in a patient whose condition recurred soon after prednisone treatment was discontinued. They observed a significant response with azathioprine. McDougal and MacDonell reported successful outcome in combination with prednisolone in a 14-year-old girl.
More recently, immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, MMF, methotrexate, and cyclosporin have been used to treat retroperitoneal fibrosis. Future steroid-sparing options could include anti-inflammatory drugs such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) inhibitors and anti-CD20 drugs.[24, 56, 55, 57, 58]
In vitro, medroxyprogesterone acetate inhibits fibroblastic proliferation. Use of progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate as an alternative treatment has been reported with successful outcome.[59, 60]
See the list below:
Temporizing maneuvers in the form of percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteral stenting are recommended in the presence of obstructive uropathy.
Primary management of retroperitoneal fibrosis consists of open biopsy, ureterolysis, and lateral/intraperitoneal transposition or omental wrapping of the involved ureter, as depicted in the image below.
Open ureterolysis, although effective in 90% of patients, is associated with significant morbidity (60%) and mortality (9%) rates. [61, 62]
In recent decades, the use of laparoscopic surgery has expanded to include complex ablative and reconstructive procedures. Kavoussi first described laparoscopic ureterolysis for retroperitoneal fibrosis in 1992.  Since then, a few authors have reported successful laparoscopic ureterolysis with a more rapid recovery and a shorter hospital stay. Although the success rate is no better than that of open ureterolysis, the laparoscopic technique has the advantage of reducing mean hospital stay, use of analgesia, convalescence period, and morbidity. [63, 64, 65]
Styn et al compared open ureterolysis (12 patients) with laparoscopic ureterolysis (13 patients) and reported a significantly shorter hospital stay (open 5.9 d vs laparoscopic 2.1 d; p=.004).  The complication rates did not differ between the groups. The success rate was 87.5% after open ureterolysis and 93.8% after laparoscopic ureterolysis (p=1).
More recently, with the advancement of technology, cases of endourologic treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis via percutaneous balloon dilatation or endoscopic incision, dilatation, and permanent wall stent have been reported, with varying results. 
Long-term ureteral stenting is a reasonable approach in high-risk and elderly patients. Ureteral stenting may be placed on a long-term basis (months to years) in order to bypass ureteral obstruction. Short-term stenting (weeks to months) may be used as an adjunct to open surgical procedures.
Other newer innovative surgical techniques have been described, such as ureterolysis and wrapping with Gore-Tex (GSM, WL Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz), excision of the ureter and reanastomosis, posterior preperitoneal flap, and renal autotransplantation. 
Patients with renal failure should be referred to a nephrologist early in the course of their disease and have continued nephrologic follow-up.
Yachoui R, Sehgal R, Carmichael B. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: clinicopathologic features and outcome analysis. Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Feb. 35 (2):401-7. [Medline].
Birnberg FA, Vinstein AL, Gorlick G, et al. Retroperitoneal fibrosis in children. Radiology. 1982 Oct. 145(1):59-61. [Medline].
Barrison IG, Walker JG, Jones C, Snell ME. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis--is serum alkaline phosphatase a marker of disease activity?. Postgrad Med J. 1988 Mar. 64(749):239-41. [Medline].
Vaglio A, Corradi D, Manenti L, Ferretti S, Garini G, Buzio C. Evidence of autoimmunity in chronic periaortitis: a prospective study. Am J Med. 2003 Apr 15. 114(6):454-62. [Medline].
Adam U, Mack D, Forstner R, Fritzenwallner A, Frick J. Conservative treatment of acute Ormond's disease. Tech Urol. 1999 Mar. 5(1):54-6. [Medline].
Kume H, Kitamura T. Spontaneous regression of bilateral hydronephrosis due to retroperitoneal fibrosis. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001 Jun. 35(3):255-6. [Medline].
Slavis SA, Wilson RW, Jones RJ, Swift C. Long-term results of permanent indwelling wallstents for benign mid-ureteral strictures. J Endourol. 2000 Sep. 14(7):577-81. [Medline].
Safioleas M, Safioleas P, Stamatakos M, Safioleas C. Retroperitoneal fibrosis obstructing the ureter: a new technique to prevent stenosis recurrence. Surgery. 2008 Feb. 143(2):299-300. [Medline].
Katz SM, Bates O, Yudis M, et al. Immune complex glomerulonephritis in a case of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1977 May. 67(5):436-9. [Medline].
Carton RW, Wong R. Multifocal fibrosclerosis manifested by vena caval obstructions and associated with vasculitis. Ann Intern Med. 1969 Jan. 70(1):81-6. [Medline].
Lepor H, Walsh PC. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Urol. 1979 Jul. 122(1):1-6. [Medline].
Mitchinson MJ. Chronic periaortitis and periarteritis. Histopathology. 1984 Jul. 8(4):589-600. [Medline].
Pistolese GR, Ippoliti A, Mauriello A, et al. Postoperative regression of retroperitoneal fibrosis in patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: evaluation with spiral computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar. 16(2):201-9. [Medline].
Higgins PM, Aber GM. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis--an update. Dig Dis. 1990. 8(4):206-22. [Medline].
Hatsiopoulou O, Irving S, Sharma SD. Retroperitoneal fibrosis in 2 brothers. J Urol. 2001 Jan. 165(1):182. [Medline].
Astudillo L, Alric L, Jamard B, Laroche M. [Retroperitoneal fibrosis in an HLA-B27-positive patient]. Rev Med Interne. 1999 Dec. 20(12):1149-50. [Medline].
Neild GH, Rodriguez-Justo M, Wall C, Connolly JO. Hyper-IgG4 disease: report and characterisation of a new disease. BMC Med. 2006 Oct 6. 4:23. [Medline].
Uibu T, Oksa P, Auvinen A, Honkanen E, Metsärinne K, Saha H, et al. Asbestos exposure as a risk factor for retroperitoneal fibrosis. Lancet. 2004 May 1. 363(9419):1422-6. [Medline].
Higgins PM, Bennett-Jones DN, Naish PF, Aber GM. Non-operative management of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Br J Surg. 1988 Jun. 75(6):573-7. [Medline].
Kottra JJ, Dunnick NR. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996 Nov. 34(6):1259-75. [Medline].
Inaraja L, Franquet T, Caballero P, et al. CT findings in circumscribed upper abdominal idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986 Nov-Dec. 10(6):1063-4. [Medline].
Hulnick DH, Chatson GP, Megibow AJ, et al. Retroperitoneal fibrosis presenting as colonic dysfunction: CT diagnosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988 Jan-Feb. 12(1):159-61. [Medline].
Arrive L, Hricak H, Tavares NJ, Miller TR. Malignant versus nonmalignant retroperitoneal fibrosis: differentiation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989 Jul. 172(1):139-43. [Medline].
McDougal WS, MacDonell RC. Treatment of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis by immunosuppression. J Urol. 1991 Jan. 145(1):112-4. [Medline].
Dedeoglu F, Rose CD, Athreya BH, et al. Successful treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis with tamoxifen in a child. J Rheumatol. 2001 Jul. 28(7):1693-5. [Medline].
van der Bilt FE, Hendriksz TR, van der Meijden WA, Brilman LG, van Bommel EF. Outcome in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis treated with corticosteroid or tamoxifen monotherapy. Clin Kidney J. 2016 Apr. 9 (2):184-91. [Medline].
Roverano S, Gallo J, Ortiz A, Migliore N, Eletti M, Paira S. Erdheim-Chester disease: description of eight cases. Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jun. 35 (6):1625-9. [Medline].
Webb AJ, Dawson-Edwards P. Non-malignant retroperitoneal fibrosis. Br J Surg. 1967 Jun. 54(6):508-18. [Medline].
Saldino RM, Palubinskas AJ. Medial placement of the ureter: a normal variant which may simulate retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Urol. 1972 Apr. 107(4):582-5. [Medline].
Clouse ME, Fraley EE, Litwin SB. Lymphangiographic criteria for diagnosis of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Radiology. 1964 Jul. 83:1-5.
Rubenstein WA, Gray G, Auh YH, et al. CT of fibrous tissues and tumors with sonographic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Nov. 147(5):1067-74. [Medline].
Amis ES Jr. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Aug. 157(2):321-9. [Medline].
Barker CD, Brown JJ. MR imaging of the retroperitoneum. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1995 Spring. 7(2):102-11. [Medline].
Burn PR, Singh S, Barbar S, et al. Role of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in retroperitoneal fibrosis. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2002 Jun. 53(3):168-70. [Medline].
Liebman RM. Positive gallium scan in retroperitoneal fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 Nov. 141(5):949-50. [Medline].
Kubota K, Yamada K, Yoshioka S, et al. Differential diagnosis of idiopathic fibrosis from malignant lymphadenopathy with PET and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. Clin Nucl Med. 1992 May. 17(5):361-3. [Medline].
Vaglio A, Versari A, Fraternali A. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and followup of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb 15. 53(1):122-5.
Ormond JK. Bilateral ureteral obstruction due to envelopment and compression by an inflammatory retroperitoneal process. J Urol. 1948. 59:1072-9.
Mitchinson MJ. The pathology of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Clin Pathol. 1970 Nov. 23(8):681-9. [Medline].
Corradi D, Maestri R, Palmisano A, Bosio S, Greco P, Manenti L, et al. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: clinicopathologic features and differential diagnosis. Kidney Int. 2007 Sep. 72(6):742-53. [Medline].
Wu J, Catalano E, Coppola D. Retroperitoneal fibrosis (Ormond's disease): clinical pathologic study of eight cases. Cancer Control. 2002 Sep-Oct. 9(5):432-7. [Medline].
Dash RC, Liu K, Sheafor DH, Dodd LG. Fine-needle aspiration findings in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999 Jul. 21(1):22-6. [Medline].
Pfammatter T, Hilfiker PR, Kurrer M, Sulser T. Transcaval biopsy of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Urol Int. 1998 Aug. 60(4):258-61. [Medline].
van Bommel EF. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Neth J Med. 2002 Jul. 60(6):231-42. [Medline].
Harreby M, Bilde T, Helin P. Retroperitoneal fibrosis treated with methylprednisolone pulse and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1994 Sep. 28(3):237-42. [Medline].
Wagenknecht LV, Hardy JC. Value of various treatments for retroperitoneal fibrosis. Eur Urol. 1981. 7(4):193-200. [Medline].
Clark CP, Vanderpool D, Preskitt JT. The response of retroperitoneal fibrosis to tamoxifen. Surgery. 1991 Apr. 109(4):502-6. [Medline].
Spillane RM, Whitman GJ. Treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis with tamoxifen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Feb. 164(2):515-6. [Medline].
Horgan K, Cooke E, Hallett MB, Mansel RE. Inhibition of protein kinase C mediated signal transduction by tamoxifen. Importance for antitumour activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 1986 Dec 15. 35(24):4463-5. [Medline].
Loffeld RJ, van Weel TF. Tamoxifen for retroperitoneal fibrosis. Lancet. 1993 Feb 6. 341(8841):382. [Medline].
Vaglio A, Palmisano A, Alberici F, et al. Prednisone versus tamoxifen in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 23. 378(9788):338-46. [Medline].
Swartz RD, Lake AM, Roberts WW, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS Jr. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a role for mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Nephrol. 2008 Apr. 69(4):260-8. [Medline].
Adler S, Lodermeyer S, Gaa J, Heemann U. Successful mycophenolate mofetil therapy in nine patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Oct. 47(10):1535-8. [Medline].
Scheel PJ Jr, Feeley N, Sozio SM. Combined prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil treatment for retroperitoneal fibrosis: a case series. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 4. 154 (1):31-6. [Medline].
Cogan E, Fastrez R. Azathioprine. An alternative treatment for recurrent idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Arch Intern Med. 1985 Apr. 145(4):753-5. [Medline].
Marzano A, Trapani A, Leone N, et al. Treatment of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis using cyclosporin. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Apr. 60(4):427-8. [Medline].
Scavalli AS, Spadaro A, Riccieri V, et al. Long-term follow-up of low-dose methotrexate therapy in one case of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Clin Rheumatol. 1995 Jul. 14(4):481-4. [Medline].
Kaipiainen-Seppanen O, Jantunen E, Kuusisto J, Marin S. Retroperitoneal fibrosis with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr. 23(4):779-81. [Medline].
Barnhill D, Hoskins W, Burke T, et al. The treatment of retroperitoneal fibromatosis with medroxyprogesterone acetate. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep. 70(3 Pt 2):502-4.
Comini Andrada E, Hoschoian JC, Anton E, Lanari A. Growth inhibition of fibroblasts by progesterone and medroxyprogesterone in vitro. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1985. 76(2):97-100. [Medline].
Kerr WS, Suby HI, Vickery A, Fraley E. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: clinical experiences with 15 cases, 1956-1967. J Urol. 1968 May. 99(5):575-84. [Medline].
Miles RM, Brock J, Martin C. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. A sometime surgical problem. Am Surg. 1984 Feb. 50(2):76-84. [Medline].
Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Brunt LM, Soper NJ. Laparoscopic ureterolysis. J Urol. 1992 Feb. 147(2):426-9. [Medline].
Matsuda T, Arai Y, Muguruma K, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolysis for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Eur Urol. 1994. 26(4):286-90. [Medline].
Fugita OE, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi P, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Endourol. 2002 Oct. 16(8):571-4. [Medline].
Styn NR, Frauman S, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS Jr. University of Michigan surgical experience with ureterolysis for retroperitoneal fibrosis: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches. Urology. 2011 Feb. 77(2):339-43. [Medline].
Baker LR. Auto-allergic periaortitis (idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis). BJU Int. 2003 Nov. 92(7):663-5. [Medline].
Cosbie Ross J, Tinckler LF. Renal failure due to peri-ureteric fibrosis. Br J Surg. 1958 Jul. 46(195):58-62. [Medline].
Cronin CG, Lohan DG, Blake MA, Roche C, McCarthy P, Murphy JM. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: a review of clinical features and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug. 191(2):423-31. [Medline].
Docimo SG, Dewolf WC. High failure rate of indwelling ureteral stents in patients with extrinsic obstruction: experience at 2 institutions. J Urol. 1989 Aug. 142(2 Pt 1):277-9. [Medline].
Elashry OM, Nakada SY, Wolf JS, et al. Ureterolysis for extrinsic ureteral obstruction: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. J Urol. 1996 Oct. 156(4):1403-10. [Medline].
Khan AN, Chandramohan M, Macdonald S. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/380772-overview. Medscape Reference Journal [serial online]. 2002. [Full Text].
Miller OF, Smith LJ, Ferrara EX, et al. Presentation of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis in the pediatric population. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Nov. 38(11):1685-8. [Medline].
Parums DV, Choudhury RP, Shields SA, Davies AH. Characterisation of inflammatory cells associated with "idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis". Br J Urol. 1991 Jun. 67(6):564-8. [Medline].
Buff DD, Bogin MB, Faltz LL. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. A report of selected cases and a review of the literature. N Y State J Med. 1989 Sep. 89(9):511-6. [Medline].
Gilkeson GS, Allen NB. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. A true connective tissue disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1996 Feb. 22(1):23-38. [Medline].
van Bommel EF, van Spengler J, van der Hoven B, Kramer P. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: report of 12 cases and a review of the literature. Neth J Med. 1991 Dec. 39(5-6):338-45. [Medline].
Thomas MH, Chisholm GD. Retroperitoneal fibrosis associated with malignant disease. Br J Cancer. 1973 Nov. 28(5):453-8. [Medline].
Zabetakis PM, Novich RK, Matarese RA, Michelis MF. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a systemic connective tissue disease?. J Urol. 1979 Jul. 122(1):100-2. [Medline].
Izzedine H, Servais A, Launay-Vacher V, Deray G. Retroperitoneal fibrosis due to Wegener's granulomatosis: a misdiagnosis as tuberculosis. Am J Med. 2002 Aug 1. 113(2):164-6. [Medline].
Albarran J. Retention renale par periureterite. Liberation externe de l'uretere. Association francaise d'urologie. 1905. 9:511.
Bourouma R, Chevet D, Michel F, et al. Treatment of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis with tamoxifen. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997 Nov. 12(11):2407-10. [Medline].
van Bommel EF, Pelkmans LG, van Damme H, Hendriksz TR. Long-term safety and efficacy of a tamoxifen-based treatment strategy for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Dec 12. [Medline].
Lian L, Wang C, Tian JL. IgG4-related retroperitoneal fibrosis: a newly characterized disease. Int J Rheum Dis. 2016 Apr 29. [Medline].
|Retroperitoneal Fibrosis||Retroperitoneal Lymphoma||Sclerosing Mesenteritis||Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis||Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor||Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma Sclerosing Variant|
|Reactive perivascular lymphoid aggregates||100%||Absent||Variable||Rare||Variable||Present in the inflammatory type|
|Necrosis||Absent||Variable||Fat necrosis||Rare||Focal||Fat necrosis|
|Β-catenin||Negative||Unknown||Negative||Positive in 90% of cases||Negative||Variable positivity|
|ALK-1||Negative||Usually negative||Negative||Negative||Positive in 50% of cases||Negative|
|CD-117||Negative in spindle cell component||Rare||Variable||Negative||Rare||Negative|
|S100||Negative||Negative||Negative||Rare||Negative||Usually positive in the adipocytic component|