Paradoxical Embolism Differential Diagnoses
- Author: Igor A Laskowski, MD; Chief Editor: Vincent Lopez Rowe, MD more...
Diagnostic Considerations
Paradoxical embolism (PDE) is a diagnosis of exclusion. It is easily mimicked by other diseases causing cerebral and peripheral arterial embolism. The major difference is that thrombus forms on the left side of the heart, including the atrial or ventricular wall and the mitral or aortic valve. The arterial embolism may lead to permanent damage, resulting in stroke, infarction of organs, or gangrene of extremities (commonly the lower extremities).
Cardioembolism causes approximately 15% of all strokes.
PDE plays a causative role in the etiology of cerebral embolism; other causes include atrial fibrillation, ischemic cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction (MI), mitral stenosis with or without atrial fibrillation, prosthetic valves, septic endocarditis, atrial myxoma, fat emboli, septal aneurysm, and ascending aortic atherosclerosis.
Peripheral arterial embolism from PDE must be differentiated from embolism of unknown origin. PDE may be associated with a hypercoagulable state, carcinoma (eg, of the pancreas), factor C or S deficiency, factor V Leiden (resistance to activated protein C), and prothrombin mutations. Atherothrombotic arterial manifestations may be difficult to differentiate in the process of trying to rule out the source of the embolus.
The arterial embolism may fragment or lyse, and the circulation may be restored over a period of time or immediately, mimicking a transient ischemic attack (TIA) from a different source. TIA may be a warning sign of eventual permanent neurologic damage.
Current diagnosis of PDE requires the following criteria:
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with or without pulmonary embolism (PE)
- Abnormal communication between the right (venous) and left (systemic) sides of the circulatory system
- Clinical, angiographic, or pathologic evidence of systemic embolism
- Presence of a favorable pressure gradient, promoting right-to-left shunting
When a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is detected in a patient with embolism, leg DVT is present in approximately 90%. DVT may be occult upon physical examination.
Because PDE is a diagnostic challenge that is prone to misdiagnosis, medicolegal action by the patient and family may result. To avoid unwanted medicolegal implications, the index of suspicion for PDE should be high.
Differential Diagnoses
- Deep Venous Thrombosis
Cohnheim J. Thrombose und Embolie. Vorlesung ueber allgemeine Pathologie. Berlin, Hirschwald. 1877;1:134.
Wahl A, Jüni P, Mono ML, Kalesan B, Praz F, Geister L, et al. Long-term propensity score-matched comparison of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with medical treatment after paradoxical embolism. Circulation. Feb 14 2012;125(6):803-12. [Medline].
Eichhorn V, Bender A, Reuter DA. Paradoxical air embolism from a central venous catheter. Br J Anaesth. May 2009;102(5):717-8. [Medline].
Vellayappan U, Attias MD, Shulman MS. Paradoxical embolization by amniotic fluid seen on the transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg. Apr 2009;108(4):1110-2. [Medline].
Mascarenhas V, Kalyanasundaram A, Nassef LA, Lico S, Qureshi A. Simultaneous massive pulmonary embolism and impending paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. Apr 14 2009;53(15):1338. [Medline].
Nightingale S, Ray GS. Paradoxical embolism causing stroke and migraine. J Postgrad Med. Jul-Sep 2010;56(3):206-8. [Medline].
Fischer D, Gardiwal A, Haentjes J, Klein G, Meyer GP, Drexler H, et al. Sustained risk of recurrent thromboembolic events in patients with patent foramen ovale and paradoxical embolism: long-term follow-up over more than 15 years. Clin Res Cardiol. Apr 2012;101(4):297-303. [Medline].
Kuppuswamy M, Kourliouros A, Sutherland G, Sarsam M. Complete surgical correction for impending paradoxical embolism with pulmonary embolism, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial flutter. Heart Surg Forum. Dec 2008;11(6):E378-9. [Medline].
Cifarelli A, Musto C, Parma A, Pandolfi C, Pucci E, Fiorilli R, et al. Long-term outcome of transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure in patients with paradoxical embolism. Int J Cardiol. Jan 28 2009;[Medline].
Allie DE, Lirtzman MD, Wyatt CH, et al. Septic paradoxical embolus through a patent foramen ovale after pacemaker implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. Mar 2000;69(3):946-8. [Medline].
Bridges ND, Hellenbrand W, Latson L, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale after presumed paradoxical embolism. Circulation. Dec 1992;86(6):1902-8. [Medline].
Cheng TO. Paradoxical embolism. Circulation. Jun 29 1999;99(25):3323. [Medline].
Corrin C. Paradoxical embolism. Br Heart J. 1991;26:549.
Dearani JA, Ugurlu BS, Danielson GK, et al. Surgical patent foramen ovale closure for prevention of paradoxical embolism-related cerebrovascular ischemic events. Circulation. Nov 9 1999;100(19 Suppl):II171-5. [Medline].
Devuyst G, Bogousslavsky J, Ruchat P, et al. Prognosis after stroke followed by surgical closure of patent foramen ovale: a prospective follow-up study with brain MRI and simultaneous transesophageal and transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Neurology. Nov 1996;47(5):1162-6. [Medline].
Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc. Jan 1984;59(1):17-20. [Medline].
Hung J, Landzberg MJ, Jenkins KJ, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale for paradoxical emboli: intermediate-term risk of recurrent neurological events following transcatheter device placement. J Am Coll Cardiol. Apr 2000;35(5):1311-6. [Medline].
Ikonomidis JS, Nisco SJ, Liang DH, et al. Paradoxical embolism of a shotgun pellet. Ann Thorac Surg. Aug 1998;66(2):562-4. [Medline].
Johnson BI. Paradoxical embolism. J Clin Pathol. 1951;4:316-32.
Kuhl HP, Hoffmann R, Merx MW, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography using second harmonic imaging: diagnostic alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of atrial right to left shunt in patients with cerebral embolic events. J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 15 1999;34(6):1823-30. [Medline].
Loscalzo J. Paradoxical embolism: clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic options. Am Heart J. Jul 1986;112(1):141-5. [Medline].
Lynch JJ, Schuchard GH, Gross CM, et al. Prevalence of right-to-left atrial shunting in a healthy population: detection by Valsalva maneuver contrast echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. May 15 1984;53(10):1478-80. [Medline].
Mas JL. Diagnosis and management of paradoxical embolism and patent formen ovale. Curr Opin Cardiol. Sep 1996;11(5):519-24. [Medline].
Mas JL, Zuber M. Recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both and cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack. French Study Group on Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Aneurysm. Am Heart J. Nov 1995;130(5):1083-8. [Medline].
Meacham RR 3rd, Headley AS, Bronze MS, et al. Impending paradoxical embolism. Arch Intern Med. Mar 9 1998;158(5):438-48. [Medline].
Nemec JJ, Marwick TH, Lorig RJ, et al. Comparison of transcranial Doppler ultrasound and transesophageal contrast echocardiography in the detection of interatrial right-to-left shunts. Am J Cardiol. Dec 1 1991;68(15):1498-502. [Medline].
Sadanandan S, Sherrid MV. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in sinus rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 2000;35(7):1932-1938. [Medline].

