Paradoxical Embolism Follow-up
- Author: Igor A Laskowski, MD; Chief Editor: Vincent Lopez Rowe, MD more...
Further Inpatient Care
- Inpatient care for people with paradoxical embolism (PDE) depends on their hemodynamic stability and associated presenting clinical manifestations, such as PE, TIA, acute arterial embolism, or debilitating neurological deficits, that may warrant intensive care or regular monitoring.
- Safety precautions and fall prevention when the risk for falls and safety concerns are present, especially in elderly patients.
- Aspiration prophylaxis is paramount in patients who are bedridden with minimal or no cough reflex.
- Neurologic watch is needed to monitor any further neurologic deficit to intervene before further deterioration.
- Intensive care monitoring is needed in the presence of hypotension and when the patient needs vasopressors, intubation, and mechanical ventilation.
- Pain management is needed in patients with acute arterial limb occlusion that commonly presents with severe pain and pain associated with DVT.
- Gastrointestinal prophylaxis is needed to prevent stress ulcers in the presence of cerebral insult.
- Skin care may involve frequent turning and protective skin devices to prevent skin breakdown and eventual decubitus ulcer.
Further Outpatient Care
- Outpatient care for paradoxical embolism (PDE) is based on evidence of idiopathic venous thrombosis, hypercoagulable states, PE, the risk-determined DVT, and the sequelae of the clinical manifestation.
- Chronic anticoagulation therapy with warfarin may be used for 6 months in DVT/PE or as lifelong therapy with monitoring of the INR in the presence of hypercoagulable states.
- Chronic antithrombotic therapy with antiplatelet drugs is needed for patients with history of TIA.
- Physical therapy is needed for patients who will benefit from physical rehabilitation.
- Visiting nurse may be highly beneficial for monitoring INR at home and helping patients in the administration of subcutaneous injection of LMWH when used for long-term anticoagulation for eventual self-administration.
Inpatient & Outpatient Medications
- Anticoagulation
- Warfarin
- Enoxaparin
- Tinzaparin
- Antiplatelet therapy
- Dipyridamole/aspirin (Aggrenox)
- Clopidogrel (Plavix)
- Ticlopidine (Ticlid)
- Thrombolytics, eg, alteplase (tPA)
Transfer
- Intensive care unit: Patients with paradoxical embolism (PDE) can be transferred to medical or surgical intensive care units in the presence of hemodynamic compromise.
- Subacute rehabilitation facility: This may be beneficial in patients with significant neurological deficits and with no further risk of emboli.
Deterrence/Prevention
Prevention remains controversial. Whether or not prophylaxis of persons with a recognized predisposition for paradoxical embolism (PDE) is beneficial and whether patients with hypercoagulable states should be screened routinely using contrast echocardiography for PFO or ASD are not established.
Complications
- Neurologic deficit as a manifestation of stroke
- Hemiplegia
- Amaurosis fugax with eventual blindness
- Motor aphasia
- Seizure disorder complicating a cerebral insult
- Arrhythmia such as ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in cases of impending paradoxical embolism (PDE)
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Loss of limb function with amputation
- Organ damage, eg, renal infarction
- Death
Prognosis
- Prognosis of paradoxical embolism (PDE) is good when it is not complicated.
- Prognosis of paradoxical embolism (PDE) is poor when it is complicated by PE. When impending paradoxical embolism (PDE) occurs, the choice of treatment involves open-heart surgery.
Patient Education
- Patients on long-term anticoagulant therapy should be compliant with their medications to prevent recurrent thrombolic events; emphasize compliance.
- Avoid vitamin K–containing foods such as green leafy vegetables, including spinach, broccoli, and cauliflower.
- Varicose veins coexist commonly with cyanotic congenital heart disease, and these may predispose to thromboembolic phenomena. These patients should avoid passive standing, should avoid crossing their legs when sitting, and should not allow their legs to be dependent.
- Avoid Valsalva maneuvers to prevent elevation of the right atrial pressure above the left atrial pressure, which can lead to transient right-to-left shunting in patients with risk factors for paradoxical embolism (PDE).
- For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Circulatory Problems Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Blood Clot in the Legs.
Cohnheim J. Thrombose und Embolie. Vorlesung ueber allgemeine Pathologie. Berlin, Hirschwald. 1877;1:134.
Eichhorn V, Bender A, Reuter DA. Paradoxical air embolism from a central venous catheter. Br J Anaesth. May 2009;102(5):717-8. [Medline].
Vellayappan U, Attias MD, Shulman MS. Paradoxical embolization by amniotic fluid seen on the transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg. Apr 2009;108(4):1110-2. [Medline].
Mascarenhas V, Kalyanasundaram A, Nassef LA, Lico S, Qureshi A. Simultaneous massive pulmonary embolism and impending paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. Apr 14 2009;53(15):1338. [Medline].
Kuppuswamy M, Kourliouros A, Sutherland G, Sarsam M. Complete surgical correction for impending paradoxical embolism with pulmonary embolism, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial flutter. Heart Surg Forum. Dec 2008;11(6):E378-9. [Medline].
Cifarelli A, Musto C, Parma A, Pandolfi C, Pucci E, Fiorilli R, et al. Long-term outcome of transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure in patients with paradoxical embolism. Int J Cardiol. Jan 28 2009;[Medline].
Allie DE, Lirtzman MD, Wyatt CH, et al. Septic paradoxical embolus through a patent foramen ovale after pacemaker implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. Mar 2000;69(3):946-8. [Medline].
Bridges ND, Hellenbrand W, Latson L, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale after presumed paradoxical embolism. Circulation. Dec 1992;86(6):1902-8. [Medline].
Cheng TO. Paradoxical embolism. Circulation. Jun 29 1999;99(25):3323. [Medline].
Corrin C. Paradoxical embolism. Br Heart J. 1991;26:549.
Dearani JA, Ugurlu BS, Danielson GK, et al. Surgical patent foramen ovale closure for prevention of paradoxical embolism-related cerebrovascular ischemic events. Circulation. Nov 9 1999;100(19 Suppl):II171-5. [Medline].
Devuyst G, Bogousslavsky J, Ruchat P, et al. Prognosis after stroke followed by surgical closure of patent foramen ovale: a prospective follow-up study with brain MRI and simultaneous transesophageal and transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Neurology. Nov 1996;47(5):1162-6. [Medline].
Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc. Jan 1984;59(1):17-20. [Medline].
Hung J, Landzberg MJ, Jenkins KJ, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale for paradoxical emboli: intermediate-term risk of recurrent neurological events following transcatheter device placement. J Am Coll Cardiol. Apr 2000;35(5):1311-6. [Medline].
Ikonomidis JS, Nisco SJ, Liang DH, et al. Paradoxical embolism of a shotgun pellet. Ann Thorac Surg. Aug 1998;66(2):562-4. [Medline].
Johnson BI. Paradoxical embolism. J Clin Pathol. 1951;4:316-32.
Kuhl HP, Hoffmann R, Merx MW, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography using second harmonic imaging: diagnostic alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of atrial right to left shunt in patients with cerebral embolic events. J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 15 1999;34(6):1823-30. [Medline].
Loscalzo J. Paradoxical embolism: clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic options. Am Heart J. Jul 1986;112(1):141-5. [Medline].
Lynch JJ, Schuchard GH, Gross CM, et al. Prevalence of right-to-left atrial shunting in a healthy population: detection by Valsalva maneuver contrast echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. May 15 1984;53(10):1478-80. [Medline].
Mas JL. Diagnosis and management of paradoxical embolism and patent formen ovale. Curr Opin Cardiol. Sep 1996;11(5):519-24. [Medline].
Mas JL, Zuber M. Recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both and cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack. French Study Group on Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Aneurysm. Am Heart J. Nov 1995;130(5):1083-8. [Medline].
Meacham RR 3rd, Headley AS, Bronze MS, et al. Impending paradoxical embolism. Arch Intern Med. Mar 9 1998;158(5):438-48. [Medline].
Nemec JJ, Marwick TH, Lorig RJ, et al. Comparison of transcranial Doppler ultrasound and transesophageal contrast echocardiography in the detection of interatrial right-to-left shunts. Am J Cardiol. Dec 1 1991;68(15):1498-502. [Medline].
Sadanandan S, Sherrid MV. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in sinus rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 2000;35(7):1932-1938. [Medline].

