eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Cardiovascular

Dissection, Aortic: Treatment & Medication

Author: John M Wiesenfarth, MD, FACEP, FAAEM, Associate Clinical Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis; Chief, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser-Permanente Hospital Sacramento/Roseville
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 28, 2009

Treatment

Prehospital Care

  • Assure adequate breathing, maintain oxygenation, treat shock, and obtain useful historic information.
  • Establishing the diagnosis in the field is usually difficult or impossible, but certain salient features of aortic dissection may be observed. It is life threatening if not quickly recognized and treated.
  • Radio communication with the receiving hospital permits the medical control physician to direct care and select a capable destination hospital while permitting the ED to mobilize appropriate resources.
  • In the rare event that the diagnosis can be made based on prehospital information, the physician directing prehospital care should request transport to a facility capable of operative treatment of an aortic dissection.

Emergency Department Care

  • The mortality rate of patients with aortic dissection is 1-2% per hour for the first 24-48 hours. Initial therapy should begin when the diagnosis is suspected. This includes 2 large-bore intravenous lines (IVs), oxygen, respiratory monitoring, and monitoring of cardiac rhythm, blood pressure, and urine output.
  • Clinically, the patient must be assessed frequently for hemodynamic compromise, mental status changes, neurologic or peripheral vascular changes, and development or progression of carotid, brachial, and femoral bruits.
  • Aggressive management of heart rate and blood pressure should be initiated.
  • Beta-blockers should be given initially to reduce the rate of change of blood pressure (dP/dt) and the shear forces on the aortic wall.
  • The target heart rate should be 60-80 beats per minute.
  • The target systolic blood pressure should be 100-120 mm Hg.
  • End organ perfusion should be evaluated. Balancing the risks of dP/dt on the aortic wall versus the benefits of acceptable end organ perfusion may be a difficult clinical decision.
  • Urgent surgical intervention is required in type A dissections.
    • The area of the aorta with the intimal tear usually is resected and replaced with a Dacron graft.
    • The operative mortality rate is usually less than 10%, and serious complications are rare with ascending aortic dissections.
    • The development of more impermeable grafts, such as woven Dacron, collagen-impregnated Hemashield (Meadox Medicals, Oakland, NJ), aortic grafts, and gel-coated Carbo-Seal Ascending Aortic Prothesis (Sulzer CarboMedics, Austin, TX) has greatly enhanced the surgical repair of thoracic aortic dissections.
    • With the introduction of profound hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion, the morbidity and mortality rates associated with this highly invasive surgery have decreased.
    • Dissections involving the arch are more complicated that those involving only the ascending aorta because the innominate, carotid, and subclavian vessels branch from the arch. Deep hypothermic arrest usually is required. If the arrest time is less than 45 minutes, the incidence of central nervous system complications is less than 10%.
    • Aortic stent grafting is a challenging technique. It may prove feasible and has offered good results in a small series of patients. It may be a reasonable alternative in high-risk patients in the near future.
  • Retrograde cerebral perfusion may increase the protection of the central nervous system during the arrest period.
    • The mortality rate of aortic arch dissections is about 10-15%, with significant neurologic complications occurring in another 10%.
    • The mortality rate is influenced by the patient's clinical condition.
  • The definitive treatment for type B dissections is less clear.
    • Uncomplicated distal dissections may be treated medically to control blood pressure.
    • Distal dissections treated medically have the same or a lower mortality rate as those treated surgically.
    • Surgery is reserved for distal dissections that are leaking, ruptured, or compromising blood flow to a vital organ.
    • Acute distal dissections in patients with Marfan syndrome usually are treated surgically.
    • Inability to control hypertension with medication is also an indication for surgery in those with a distal thoracic aortic dissection.
    • Patients with a distal dissection are usually hypertensive, emphysematous, or older.
    • Long-term medical therapy involves a beta-adrenergic blocker combined with other antihypertensive medications. Avoid antihypertensives (eg, hydralazine, minoxidil) that produce a hyperdynamic response that would increase dP/dt (ie, alter the duration of P or T waves).
    • Survivors of surgical therapy also should receive beta-adrenergic blockers.
    • A recent series of patients with type B dissections demonstrates that aggressive use of distal perfusion, CSF drainage, and hypothermia with circulatory arrest improves early mortality and long-term survival rates.
    • Endovascular stenting remains an option for treatment of some type B dissections. Some studies recommend that patients with complicated acute type B dissections undergo endovascular stenting with the goal to cover the primary intimal tear.7
  • Definitive treatment involves segmental resection of the dissection with interposition of a synthetic graft.
    • When thoracic dissections are associated with aortic valvular disease, replace the defective valve.
    • With combined reconstruction–valve replacement, the operative mortality rate is approximately 5% with a late mortality rate of less than 10%.
    • Operative repair of the transverse aortic arch is technically difficult, with an operative mortality rate of 10% despite induction of hypothermic cardiocirculatory arrest.
    • Repair of the descending aorta is associated with a higher incidence of paraplegia than repair of other types of dissections because of interruption of segmental blood supply to the spinal cord.
    • The operative mortality rate is approximately 5%.

The American College of Radiology has established ACR Appropriateness Criteria for diagnosis and treatment of suspected aortic dissection.8

Consultations

  • Once a thoracic dissection is suspected, consult a thoracic surgeon.
    • Because many patients with this disorder have concomitant medical illness, consult the patient's primary care provider to expedite preoperative preparation.
    • Early consultation is encouraged when ordering further imaging studies if the patient requires rapid operative intervention.
  • Consult a radiologist prior to obtaining aortography.

Medication

Initial therapeutic goals include elimination of pain and reduction of systolic blood pressure to 100-120 mm Hg or to the lowest level commensurate with adequate vital organ (ie, cardiac, cerebral, renal) perfusion.

Whether systolic hypertension or pain is present, beta-blockers are used to reduce arterial dP/dt.

To prevent exacerbations of tachycardia and hypertension, treat patients with IV morphine sulfate. This reduces the force of cardiac contraction and the rate of rise of the aortic pressure (dP/dt). It then retards the propagation of the dissection and delays rupture.

Antihypertensives

These agents are used to reduce arterial dP/dt. For acute reduction of arterial pressure, the potent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside is effective. To reduce dP/dt acutely, administer an IV beta-blocker in incremental doses until a heart rate of 60-80 beats/min is attained.

When beta-blockers are contraindicated, such as in second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, consider using calcium channel blockers. Sublingual nifedipine successfully treats refractory hypertension associated with aortic dissection.


Esmolol (Brevibloc)

Ultra–short-acting beta2-blocker, particularly useful in patients with labile arterial pressure, especially if surgery is planned, because it can be discontinued abruptly if necessary. Normally used in conjunction with nitroprusside. May be useful as a means to test beta-blocker safety and tolerance in patients with history of obstructive pulmonary disease who are at uncertain risk of bronchospasm from beta-blockade. Elimination half-life is 9 min.

Adult

250-500 mcg/kg/min IV for 1 min as loading dose, followed by a 4-min maintenance infusion of 50 mcg/kg/min; repeat loading dose and follow with maintenance infusion using increments of 50 mcg/kg/min for 4 min; if therapeutic effects not observed in 5 min, repeat sequence up to 4 times prn
As desired BP is approached, omit loading infusion and reduce incremental dose of maintenance infusion from 50 mcg/kg/min to 25 mcg/kg/min or lower; may increase interval between titration steps to 5-10 min if desired

Pediatric

Not established

Aluminum salts, barbiturates, NSAIDs, penicillins, calcium salts, cholestyramine, and rifampin may decrease bioavailability and plasma levels, possibly resulting in decreased pharmacologic effect; sparfloxacin, astemizole (recalled from US market), calcium channel blockers, quinidine, flecainide, and contraceptives may increase cardiotoxicity; digoxin, flecainide, acetaminophen, clonidine, epinephrine, nifedipine, prazosin, haloperidol, phenothiazines, and catecholamine-depleting agents may increase toxicity

Documented hypersensitivity; uncompensated CHF; bradycardia; cardiogenic shock; AV conduction abnormalities

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Beta-adrenergic blockers may mask signs and symptoms of acute hypoglycemia and clinical signs of hyperthyroidism; symptoms of hyperthyroidism, including thyroid storm, may worsen when medication is withdrawn abruptly; withdraw drug slowly and monitor patient closely


Labetalol (Normodyne, Trandate)

Blocks alpha-, beta1-, and beta2-adrenergic receptor sites, decreasing BP.

Adult

Initial dose: 20 mg (0.25 mg/kg for 80-kg patient) IV over 2 min; follow with 20-80 mg q10-15min until BP controlled
Maintenance dose: 2 mg/min continuous IV infusion; titrate up to 5-20 mg/min; not to exceed a total dose of 300 mg

Pediatric

Not established

Decreases effects of diuretics and increases toxicity of methotrexate, lithium, and salicylates; may diminish reflex tachycardia associated with nitroglycerin use without interfering with hypotensive effects; cimetidine may increase blood levels; glutethimide may decrease effects by inducing microsomal enzymes

Documented hypersensitivity; cardiogenic shock; AV block; uncompensated CHF; pulmonary edema; bradycardia; reactive airway disease

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in impaired hepatic function; discontinue therapy with signs of liver dysfunction; in elderly patients, lower response rate and higher incidence of toxicity may be observed


Propranolol (Inderal, Betachron E-R)

Class II antiarrhythmic nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocker. Has membrane-stabilizing activity and decreases automaticity of contractions. Not suitable for emergency treatment of hypertension. Do not administer IV in hypertensive emergencies.

Adult

40-80 mg PO bid initially; increase to usual range of 160-320 mg/d prn; up to 640 mg/d may be required

Pediatric

0.5 mg/kg/d PO divided bid/qid; increase gradually q3-7d; usual dosage range is 2-4 mg/kg/d divided bid; not to exceed 16 mg/kg/d

Aluminum salts, barbiturates, NSAIDs, penicillins, calcium salts, cholestyramine, and rifampin may decrease effects; calcium channel blockers, cimetidine, loop diuretics, and MAOIs may increase toxicity; may increase toxicity of hydralazine, haloperidol, benzodiazepines, and phenothiazines

Documented hypersensitivity; uncompensated CHF; bradycardia; cardiogenic shock; AV conduction abnormalities

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Beta-adrenergic blockade may decrease signs of acute hypoglycemia and hyperthyroidism; abrupt withdrawal may exacerbate symptoms of hyperthyroidism, including thyroid storm; withdraw drug slowly and monitor closely


Metoprolol (Lopressor)

Selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blocker that decreases automaticity of contractions. During IV administration, carefully monitor BP, heart rate, and ECG. When considering conversion from IV to PO dosage forms, use ratio of 2.5 mg PO to 1 mg IV metoprolol.

Adult

100 mg/d PO qd or divided bid/tid initially; increase at 1-wk intervals prn; not to exceed 450 mg/d prn

Pediatric

Not established

Aluminum salts, barbiturates, NSAIDs, penicillins, calcium salts, cholestyramine, and rifampin may decrease bioavailability and plasma levels, possibly resulting in decreased pharmacologic effects; sparfloxacin, phenothiazines, astemizole (recalled from US market), calcium channel blockers, quinidine, flecainide, and contraceptives may increase toxicity; may increase toxicity of digoxin, flecainide, clonidine, epinephrine, nifedipine, prazosin, verapamil, and lidocaine

Documented hypersensitivity; uncompensated CHF; cardiogenic shock; bradycardia; AV conduction abnormalities

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Beta-adrenergic blockade may reduce signs and symptoms of acute hypoglycemia and may decrease clinical signs of hyperthyroidism; abrupt withdrawal may exacerbate symptoms of hyperthyroidism, including thyroid storm; monitor patient closely and withdraw drug slowly; during IV administration, carefully monitor BP, heart rate, and ECG


Nitroprusside (Nitropress)

Causes peripheral vasodilation by direct action on venous and arteriolar smooth muscle, thus reducing peripheral resistance. Commonly used IV because of rapid onset and short duration of action. Easily titratable to reach desired effect. Light sensitive; both bottle and tubing should be wrapped in aluminum foil. Prior to initiating nitroprusside, administer beta-blocker to counteract physiologic response of reflex tachycardia that occurs when nitroprusside used alone. This physiologic response increases shear forces against aortic wall, thus increasing dP/dt. Objective is to keep heart rate at 60-80 bpm.

Adult

0.5-3 mcg/kg/min IV; rates >4 mcg/kg/min may lead to cyanide toxicity

Pediatric

Administer as in adults

Documented hypersensitivity; subaortic stenosis; idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis; atrial fibrillation or flutter

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in increased intracranial pressure, hepatic failure, severe renal impairment, and hypothyroidism; in renal or hepatic insufficiency, levels may increase and can cause cyanide toxicity; sodium nitroprusside has ability to lower BP and thus should be used only in patients with mean arterial pressures >70 mm Hg

Analgesics

Pain control is essential to quality patient care. It ensures patient comfort, promotes pulmonary toilet, and prevent exacerbations of tachycardia and hypertension.


Morphine sulfate (Astramorph, Infumorph)

DOC for narcotic analgesia because of reliable and predictable effects, safety profile, and ease of reversibility with naloxone. Similar to fentanyl, morphine sulfate easily titrated to desired level of pain control. If administered IV, may be dosed in a number of ways; commonly titrated until desired effect obtained.

Adult

Initial dose: 0.1 mg/kg IV/IM/SC
Maintenance dose: 5-20 mg/70 kg q4h IV/IM/SC

Pediatric

0.1-0.2 mg/kg IV/IM/SC q2-4h prn

Phenothiazines may antagonize analgesic effects; tricyclic antidepressants, MAOIs, and other CNS depressants may potentiate adverse effects

Documented hypersensitivity; hypotension; potentially compromised airway in which establishing rapid airway control would be difficult

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Avoid in hypotension, respiratory depression, nausea, emesis, constipation, and urinary retention; caution in atrial flutter and other supraventricular tachycardias; has vagolytic action and may increase ventricular response rate

More on Dissection, Aortic

Overview: Dissection, Aortic
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Dissection, Aortic
Treatment & Medication: Dissection, Aortic
Follow-up: Dissection, Aortic
Multimedia: Dissection, Aortic
References

References

  1. Clouse WD, Hallett JW Jr, Schaff HV, Spittell PC, Rowland CM, Ilstrup DM, et al. Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb 2004;79(2):176-80. [Medline].

  2. Sutherland A, Escano J, Coon TP. D-dimer as the sole screening test for acute aortic dissection: a review of the literature. Ann Emerg Med. Oct 2008;52(4):339-43. [Medline].

  3. Spittell PC, Spittell JA Jr, Joyce JW, Tajik AJ, Edwards WD, Schaff HV, et al. Clinical features and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection: experience with 236 cases (1980 through 1990). Mayo Clin Proc. Jul 1993;68(7):642-51. [Medline].

  4. von Kodolitsch Y, Nienaber CA, Dieckmann C, Schwartz AG, Hofmann T, Brekenfeld C, et al. Chest radiography for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome. Am J Med. Jan 15 2004;116(2):73-7. [Medline].

  5. Spiegel EA, Wassreman S. Experimentalstudien uber die Entsehungdes Aortenschmerzes und seine Leitung zum zentralnervensystem. Ztschr F. d. ges. Exper Med. 1926;52:180-196.

  6. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. Feb 16 2000;283(7):897-903. [Medline].

  7. Chaikof EL, Mutrie C, Kasirajan K, Milner R, Chen EP, Veeraswamy RK, et al. Endovascular repair for diverse pathologies of the thoracic aorta: an initial decade of experience. J Am Coll Surg. May 2009;208(5):802-16; discussion 816-8. [Medline].

  8. [Guideline] Mammen L, Yucel EK, Khan A, Atalay MK, Haramati LB, Ho VB, et al. Acute chest pain--suspected aortic dissection. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR). 2008;[Full Text].

  9. Bickerstaff LK, Pairolero PC, Hollier LH, et al. Thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. Surgery. Dec 1982;92(6):1103-8. [Medline].

  10. Chen K, Varon J, Wenker OC, et al. Acute thoracic aortic dissection: the basics. J Emerg Med. Nov-Dec 1997;15(6):859-67. [Medline].

  11. Cigarroa J, Isselbacher E, DeSanctis R. Diagnostic Imaging in the Evaluation of Suspected Aortic Dissection. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(1):35-43. [Medline].

  12. De Bakey ME, Cooley DA. Successful resection of aneurysm of thoracic aorta and replacement by graft. J Am Med Assoc. Jun 20 1953;152(8):673-6. [Medline].

  13. De Bakey ME, Cooley DA, Creech O. Surgical considerations of dissecting aneurysm of the aorta. Ann Surg. Oct 1955;142(4):586-610; discussion, 611-2. [Medline].

  14. DeSanctis R, Doroghazi R, Austen G. Aortic Dissection. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(17):1060-66. [Medline].

  15. Erbel R, Engberding R, Daniel W, et al. Echocardiography in diagnosis of aortic dissection. Lancet. Mar 4 1989;1(8636):457-61. [Medline].

  16. Erdheim J. Medionecrosis Aorte Idiopathica Apitca. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat. 1930;276:187-229. [Medline].

  17. Goldman L, Ausiello D. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 22nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 2004.

  18. Hasham SN, Lewin MR, Tran VT, et al. Nonsyndromic genetic predisposition to aortic dissection: a newly recognized, diagnosable, and preventable occurrence in families. Ann Emerg Med. Jan 2004;43(1):79-82. [Medline].

  19. Jagannath AS, Sos TA, Lockhart SH, et al. Aortic dissection: a statistical analysis of the usefulness of plain chest radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Dec 1986;147(6):1123-6. [Medline].

  20. Januzzi JL, Marayati F, Mehta RH, Cooper JV, O'Gara PT, Sechtem U, et al. Comparison of aortic dissection in patients with and without Marfan's syndrome (results from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection). Am J Cardiol. Aug 1 2004;94(3):400-2. [Medline].

  21. Knaut AL, Cleveland JC. Aortic emergencies. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Nov 2003;21(4):817-45. [Medline].

  22. Krukenberg E. Beitrage zur Frage des Aneurysma Dissecans. Beitr Pathol Anat Allerg Pathol. 1920;67:329-351. [Medline].

  23. Lee JT, White RA. Current status of thoracic aortic endograft repair. Surg Clin North Am. Oct 2004;84(5):1295-318, vi-vii. [Medline].

  24. Nichols F. Observations Concerning the Body of His Late Majesty. Philos Trans Lond. 1762;52:265-275. [Medline].

  25. Pansini S, Gagliardotto PV, Pompei E, et al. Early and late risk factors in surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. Sep 1998;66(3):779-84. [Medline].

  26. Ponraj P, Pepper J. Aortic dissection. Br J Clin Pract. Summer 1992;46(2):127-31. [Medline].

  27. Prokop EK, Palmer RF, Wheat MW Jr. Hydrodynamic forces in dissecting aneurysms. In-vitro studies in a Tygon model and in dog aortas. Circ Res. Jul 1970;27(1):121-7. [Medline].

  28. Rogers RL, McCormack R. Aortic disasters. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Nov 2004;22(4):887-908. [Medline].

  29. Safi HJ, Miller CC, Reardon MJ, et al. Operation for acute and chronic aortic dissection: recent outcome with regard to neurologic deficit and early death. Ann Thorac Surg. Aug 1998;66(2):402-11. [Medline].

  30. Sarasin FP, Louis-Simonet M, Gaspoz JM, et al. Detecting acute thoracic aortic dissection in the emergency department: time constraints and choice of the optimal diagnostic test. Ann Emerg Med. Sep 1996;28(3):278-88. [Medline].

  31. Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, et al. Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operations. J Vasc Surg. Feb 1993;17(2):357-68; discussion 368-70. [Medline].

  32. Tatli S, Yucel EK, Lipton MJ. CT and MR imaging of the thoracic aorta: current techniques and clinical applications. Radiol Clin North Am. May 2004;42(3):565-85, vi. [Medline].

  33. Winsor G, Thomas SH, Biddinger PD. Inadequate hemodynamic management in patients undergoing interfacility transfer for suspected aortic dissection. Am J Emerg Med. Jan 2005;23(1):24-9. [Medline].

  34. Wooley C, Sparks E, Boudoulas H. Aortic pain. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1998;40(6):563-589. [Medline].

Further Reading

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

John M Wiesenfarth, MD, FACEP, FAAEM, Associate Clinical Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis; Chief, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser-Permanente Hospital Sacramento/Roseville
John M Wiesenfarth, MD, FACEP, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Joseph J Sachter, MD, FACEP, Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center
Joseph J Sachter, MD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physician Executives, American Medical Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Gary Setnik, MD, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital; Assistant Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Gary Setnik, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, National Association of EMS Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: SironaHealth Salary Management position; South Middlesex EMS Consortium Salary Management position

CME Editor

John D Halamka, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP, Professor of Emergency Medicine, Professor of Internal Medicine, Program Director, Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals, Case Medical Center
Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Thoracic Society, Arkansas Medical Society, New York Academy of Medicine, New York Academy of Sciences, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.