eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Cardiovascular

Atrial Fibrillation: Follow-up

Author: Pierre Borczuk, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Associate in Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 15, 2009

Follow-up

Further Inpatient Care

  • Preventing complications of atrial fibrillation (AF)
    • Cardioversion (either electrical or chemical) carries a significant risk of embolization. Anticoagulants usually are administered to patients with atrial fibrillation lasting more than 48 hours. They are administered 3 weeks before to 4 weeks after cardioversion. Stunning of the atria may occur for several weeks following cardioversion, and the atrial chambers are at increased risk of developing thrombi. For this reason, antiarrhythmic agents that restore sinus rhythm should be withheld until anticoagulation has been achieved.
    • Stroke recurrence rate is high for patients with atrial fibrillation; therefore, long-term warfarin therapy is recommended. Aspirin offers only modest protection against stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation. The effect is less consistent than that of oral anticoagulation. However, for patients who cannot tolerate warfarin, aspirin is a suitable alternative.

Further Outpatient Care

Long-term management of atrial fibrillation has most commonly centered around 1 of 2 strategies: rhythm control versus rate control.18 The discussion surrounding these strategies has been dominated by the following questions: Is AF best managed by rhythm control?, Is AF best managed by rate control?, How is sinus rhythm best maintained?, What is the best means of preventing thromboembolism? While these questions are arguably the purview of cardiologists, it behooves the emergency medicine physician to have a basic knowledge of recent developments in this area. The main studies can be summarized as follows:

  • AFFIRM - Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management19,20
    • 4000 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, randomized to rate versus rhythm control
    • No change in mortality at 5 years (24% vs 21%) in rhythm vs rate
    • Not all patients remained anticoagulated in the rhythm group, and this caused a higher risk/trend for ischemic stroke.
  • RACE – Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation21,22,23
    • 522 patients who had persistent AF despite electrical cardioversion randomized to rate versus rhythm control
    • In the rhythm group, option to stop warfarin (Coumadin) if sinus rhythm >1 months
    • 2.3 year follow-up, and no change in composite endpoint of death from cardiovascular causes, heart failure, or thromboembolic causes
    • There was a high incidence of a thromboembolic event in the rhythm controlled, subtherapeutic or non-warfarin patients

Transfer

  • Transfer to a referral center if the patient has complications, including the following:
    • Bradycardia caused by sick sinus syndrome that requires pacemaker therapy
    • Unresponsive rate control despite adequate medical therapy - After electrical cardioversion, referral for electrophysiologic ablation may be appropriate. These patients generally are transferred from one inpatient facility to another.
    • Embolic complications requiring surgical therapy (arterial embolization) or CVA requiring neurointensive care

Complications

  • Stroke (AF-associated stroke is particularly a problem for patients older than 75 years)
  • Arterial embolization
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Severe bradycardia
  • Rate-related myocardial ischemia

Prognosis

  • The rate of ischemic stroke among patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation averages 5% year, which is somewhere between 2-7 times the rate of stroke in patients without atrial fibrillation.
  • The total mortality rate is approximately doubled in patients with atrial fibrillation compared with patients in normal sinus rhythm and is linked with the severity of underlying heart disease.

Patient Education

  • In cases of intermittent atrial fibrillation, educating the patient on rapid access to 911 services is beneficial.
  • Long-term education should be the responsibility of the primary care provider, but certainly knowledge about stroke risk and prevention should be initially imparted by the emergency to the patient with atrial fibrillation.
  • For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Heart Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Atrial Fibrillation.

Miscellaneous

Medicolegal Pitfalls

  • Watch for development of severe bradycardia during treatment. This may cause severe hypotension and death if not carefully monitored.
  • Rarely, atrial fibrillation (AF) may be due to pulmonary embolism, pericardial disease/effusion, or carbon monoxide intoxication. Keep these rare events in mind when dealing with the unusual case that does not respond to standard therapy.
  • Managed care has recently pushed for discharging stable patients with lone atrial fibrillation for follow-up within 24-48 hours. In these patients, carefully document normal ventricular function (using echocardiography, if possible) and obtain baseline thyroid studies. Be certain that a qualified internist or cardiologist will follow-up with the patient within this time frame. Once established in the ED, oral medication for rate control may be appropriate in these cases.
  • Most patients with lone or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will self-convert. Episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation may last from a few seconds to several weeks. Spontaneous conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm occurs in 68% of persons presenting with atrial fibrillation of fewer than 72 hours duration.
  • Beware of atrial fibrillation in Wolfe-Parkinson-White syndrome. In young patients with this disorder, which appears as rapid wide-complex AF with a rate of more than 200 beats per minute, the use of calcium channel blockers may induce ventricular fibrillation.

Special Concerns

 
Acknowledgments

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors, Jeffrey Lazar, MD, and Alan D Clark, MD†, to the development and writing of this article.



More on Atrial Fibrillation

Overview: Atrial Fibrillation
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Atrial Fibrillation
Treatment & Medication: Atrial Fibrillation
Follow-up: Atrial Fibrillation
Multimedia: Atrial Fibrillation
References

References

  1. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. Sep 8 1998;98(10):946-52. [Medline].

  2. Braunwald E. Heart disease. In: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1997:641-56.

  3. Coyne KS, Paramore C, Grandy S, Mercader M, Reynolds M, Zimetbaum P. Assessing the direct costs of treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States. Value Health. Sep-Oct 2006;9(5):348-56. [Medline][Full Text].

  4. Abdel Latif A, Messinger-Rapport BJ. Should nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation be anticoagulated?. Cleve Clin J Med. Jan 2004;71(1):40-4. [Medline].

  5. Stollberger C, Chnupa P, Abzieher C, et al. Mortality and rate of stroke or embolism in atrial fibrillation during long-term follow-up in the embolism in left atrial thrombi (ELAT) study. Clin Cardiol. Jan 2004;27(1):40-6. [Medline].

  6. Rathore SS, Berger AK, Weinfurt KP, et al. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrial fibrillation in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes. Circulation. Mar 7 2000;101(9):969-74. [Medline].

  7. Klein AL, Grimm RA, Murray RD, et al. Use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. May 10 2001;344(19):1411-20. [Medline].

  8. Michael JA, Stiell IG, Agarwal S, Mandavia DP. Cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. Apr 1999;33(4):379-87. [Medline].

  9. [Guideline] Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. Aug 15 2006;114(7):e257-354. [Medline][Full Text].

  10. Padanilam BJ, Prystowsky EN. Atrial fibrillation: goals of therapy and management strategies to achieve the goals. Med Clin North Am. Jan 2008;92(1):217-35, xii-xiii. [Medline].

  11. Kim SS, Knight BP. Electrical and pharmacologic cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Med Clin North Am. Jan 2008;92(1):101-20, xi. [Medline].

  12. Berry C, Stewart S, Payne EM, McArthur JD, McMurray JJ. Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: outcomes in "real-life" clinical practice. Int J Cardiol. Nov 2001;81(1):29-35. [Medline].

  13. Alboni P, Botto GL, Baldi N, et al. Outpatient treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with the "pill-in-the-pocket" approach. N Engl J Med. Dec 2 2004;351(23):2384-91. [Medline].

  14. Lee KS. Ibutilide, a new compound with potent class III antiarrhythmic activity, activates a slow inward Na+ current in guinea pig ventricular cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. Jul 1992;262(1):99-108. [Medline].

  15. Weigner MJ, Caulfield TA, Danias PG, Silverman DI, Manning WJ. Risk for clinical thromboembolism associated with conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation lasting less than 48 hours. Ann Intern Med. Apr 15 1997;126(8):615-20. [Medline].

  16. Tracy CM. The Modern Management of Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation in the Post-AFFIRM Era. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. Oct 2003;5(5):347-354. [Medline].

  17. Pappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G, et al. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: A new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Nov 21 2000;102(21):2619-28. [Medline][Full Text].

  18. Carlsson J, Miketic S, Windeler J, et al. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation: the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 21 2003;41(10):1690-6. [Medline].

  19. AFFIRM Investigators. Baseline characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation: the AFFIRM Study. Am Heart J. Jun 2002;143(6):991-1001. [Medline].

  20. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. Dec 5 2002;347(23):1825-33. [Medline].

  21. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. Dec 5 2002;347(23):1834-40. [Medline].

  22. Hagens VE, Ranchor AV, Van Sonderen E, et al. Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation. Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 21 2004;43(2):241-7. [Medline].

  23. Hagens VE, Vermeulen KM, TenVergert EM, et al. Rate control is more cost-effective than rhythm control for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation--results from the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study. Eur Heart J. Sep 2004;25(17):1542-9. [Medline][Full Text].

  24. Aronow WS. Management of the older person with atrial fibrillation. J Am Geriatr Soc. Jun 1999;47(6):740-8. [Medline].

  25. Brass LM, Krumholz HM, Scinto JD, Mathur D, Radford M. Warfarin use following ischemic stroke among Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. Oct 26 1998;158(19):2093-100. [Medline].

  26. Farshi R, Kistner D, Sarma JS, Longmate JA, Singh BN. Ventricular rate control in chronic atrial fibrillation during daily activity and programmed exercise: a crossover open-label study of five drug regimens. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 1999;33(2):304-10. [Medline].

  27. Feinberg WM. Anticoagulation for prevention of stroke. Neurology. Sep 1998;51(3 Suppl 3):S20-2. [Medline].

  28. Halperin JL. Ximelagatran compared with warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Rationale, objectives, and design of a pair of clinical studies and baseline patient characteristics (SPORTIF III and V). Am Heart J. Sep 2003;146(3):431-8. [Medline].

  29. Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation--Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Lancet. Nov 25 2000;356(9244):1789-94. [Medline].

  30. Iqbal MB, Taneja AK, Lip GY, Flather M. Recent developments in atrial fibrillation. BMJ. Jan 29 2005;330(7485):238-43. [Medline].

  31. Lairikyengbam SK, Anderson MH, Davies AG. Present treatment options for atrial fibrillation. Postgrad Med J. Feb 2003;79(928):67-73. [Medline].

  32. Mann J. EM Guidemap - Atrial Fibrillation. [Web site] http://www.homestead.com/emguidemaps/files/atrialfib.html. Accessed June 3, 2003.

  33. Markides V, Schilling RJ. Atrial fibrillation: classification, pathophysiology, mechanisms and drug treatment. Heart. Aug 2003;89(8):939-43. [Medline].

  34. McNamara RL, Tamariz LJ, Segal JB, Bass EB. Management of atrial fibrillation: review of the evidence for the role of pharmacologic therapy, electrical cardioversion, and echocardiography. Ann Intern Med. Dec 16 2003;139(12):1018-33. [Medline].

  35. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Atrial fibrillation: current understandings and research imperatives. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 1993;22(7):1830-4. [Medline].

  36. Pritchett EL. Management of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. May 7 1992;326(19):1264-71. [Medline].

  37. Sager PT. New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Curr Opin Cardiol. Jan 2000;15(1):41-53. [Medline].

  38. Saxonhouse SJ, Curtis AB. Risks and benefits of rate control versus maintenance of sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol. Mar 20 2003;91(6A):27D-32D. [Medline].

  39. Slavik RS, Tisdale JE, Borzak S. Pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of available evidence. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. Sep-Oct 2001;44(2):121-52. [Medline].

  40. [Guideline] Snow V, Weiss KB, LeFevre M, et al. Management of newly detected atrial fibrillation: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. Dec 16 2003;139(12):1009-17. [Medline].

  41. Vidaillet H, Greenlee RT. Rate control versus rhythm control. Curr Opin Cardiol. Jan 2005;20(1):15-20. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, AF, atrial fib, atrial fibrillation treatment, bradyarrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia, arrhythmia, heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, AMI, congestive heart disease, CHD, coronary artery disease, CAD, cardiovascular disease, heart attack, rhythm disturbance, atrioventricular node, AV node, palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain, angina, syncope, hypotension, congestive heart failure, CHF, jugular venous distension, hypertension, valvular heart disease, rheumatic heart disease 

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Pierre Borczuk, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Associate in Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
Pierre Borczuk, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

William Lober, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Education, Division of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Gary Setnik, MD, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital; Assistant Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Gary Setnik, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, National Association of EMS Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: SironaHealth Salary Management position; South Middlesex EMS Consortium Salary Management position

CME Editor

John D Halamka, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

David FM Brown, MD, Assistant Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Vice Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
David FM Brown, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.