eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Cardiovascular

Myocardial Infarction: Follow-up

Author: Drew Evan Fenton, MD, Hospitalist, Our Health Care Consultants
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Oct 5, 2009

Follow-up

Further Inpatient Care

  • All patients with known or suspected MI should be admitted to an ICU.
  • Patients should continue to receive beta-blockers, nitrates, and heparin, as indicated.
  • ACE inhibitors have been shown to improve survival rates in patients who have experienced an MI. In the acute setting, afterload reduction from ACE inhibitors may reduce the risk of CHF and sudden death.
  • Lidocaine may be indicated for patients with ventricular ectopy that is complex or for patients with hemodynamically significant, nonsustained, or sustained ventricular tachycardia. Recall that the routine use of lidocaine as prophylaxis for ventricular arrhythmias is contraindicated.

Transfer

  • A recent study showed that the transfer of patients to an invasive-treatment center for primary PCI is superior to on-site fibrinolysis provided that the transfer can be accomplished within 2 hours. Transfer should be considered for those patients who are likely to benefit from PCI or cardiac surgery but who are in an institution where access to such interventions is not immediate. The benefits of transferring such a patient must outweigh the risks. Patients for whom transfer might be considered include the following:
    • Patients with new or worsening hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitant murmurs
    • Patients with known or suspected critical aortic stenosis and either ongoing ischemia or hemodynamic instability
    • Patients who have received thrombolysis and fail to reperfuse
    • Patients with significant LV dysfunction or cardiogenic shock
  • Cantor et al studied high-risk patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) who received fibrinolytic therapy in hospitals that do not have percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capabilities.4
    • The patients (n=1059) were randomized to either standard treatment (ie, if needed, included rescue PCI, or delayed angiography) or immediate transfer to another hospital and PCI within 6 hours following fibrinolysis. All patients received aspirin, tenecteplase, and anticoagulation (heparin or enoxaparin), and clopidogrel was recommended.
    • The study’s primary endpoint was a composite of death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, new or worsening congestive heart failure, or cardiogenic shock within 30 days. The primary end point occurred in 11% of patients in the group that was immediately transferred compared with 17.2% of patients randomized to the standard treatment (P=0.004). A significant decrease in ischemic complications was observed in high-risk patients with STEMI who were treated with fibrinolysis and transferred for PCI within 6 hours following fibrinolysis.

Deterrence/Prevention

  • Patients should avoid risk factors when possible and act upon treatable risk factors.
  • Seeking medical attention or calling 911 with the first symptoms or signs of angina may initiate the cascade of interventions that will ultimately prevent or limit damage to the myocardium. All patients should be educated as to these symptoms and signs and when to call 911.
  • Daily low-dose aspirin may be helpful, but the decision to prescribe aspirin as a preventative measure for MI must be made considering his or her overall condition and risk-benefit ratio.

Complications

  • Monitoring and treatment of arrhythmias and conduction disturbances are an important part of the treatment of a post-MI patient within the first 48 hours. Conduction disturbances are most commonly observed in inferior MI but are more ominous when they occur with anterior MI.
  • Tachyarrhythmia
    • Sinus tachycardia is a poor prognostic sign that is indicative of ventricular dysfunction or failure.
    • PVCs - Simple (ie, <10/h), no need to treat
    • PVCs - Complex, NSVT/VT, lidocaine DOC
    • Accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR) is the most common reperfusion arrhythmia, but it usually is well tolerated and does not require treatment.
  • Bradyarrhythmia
    • Type I second-degree heart block (ie, Wenckebach) is associated with inferior wall MI. Treat using temporary pacing or atropine only if it is hemodynamically significant.
    • Type II second-degree heart block is associated with anterior wall MI and may require a permanent pacemaker. Bundle branch blocks (BBB) that are new or preexisting with new second-degree heart block may also mandate consideration for a permanent pacemaker.
  • Cardiogenic shock
    • In the setting of an MI, cardiogenic shock is associated with an 80% in-hospital mortality rate.
    • Patients should undergo thrombolysis or PCI, placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump, or CABG.
  • Valvular insufficiency
    • This may occur acutely when ischemia or an infarct of the papillary muscle occurs resulting in mitral regurgitation. It usually presents as flash pulmonary edema and hypotension. Papillary muscle rupture may require valve repair.
    • Ischemia often responds to medical therapy and thrombolysis.
  • Congestive heart failure can be due to systolic or diastolic dysfunction in MI. The severity of the heart failure and systolic dysfunction depends on the extent of the infarct and the presence of any other complications, such as acute mitral regurgitation. Treatment may include nitrates, morphine, diuretics, and ACE inhibitors. Digoxin has no role in acute CHF due to ischemia.
  • Right ventricular infarct occurs in the setting of an inferior wall infarction. Because patients with an RV infarct are preload-dependent, they often are identified by profound hypotension with normal pulmonary auscultation, particularly after nitroglycerin therapy. They respond to volume loading. This can be diagnosed by ST-segment elevation in right-sided chest leads (ie, V4 R, V5 R).
  • Ventricular rupture occurs in the interventricular septum or the left ventricle free wall. Rupture represents a catastrophic event with mortality rates greater than 90%. Prompt recognition, stabilization, and surgical repair are crucial to any hope of survival. An echocardiogram usually defines the abnormality, and a right heart catheterization may show an oxygenation increase with septal rupture. It is more common in women, patients with hypertension, and those receiving NSAIDs or steroids.
  • Other complications include pericarditis, ventricular aneurysm, and mural thrombus.

Prognosis

  • MI may be associated with a mortality rate as high as 30%, with more than half of deaths occurring in the prehospital setting. Prognosis is highly variable and depends on a number of factors related to the timing and nature of intervention, success of the intervention (ie, infarct size), and post-MI management.
  • Better prognosis is associated with factors including the following:
    • Successful early reperfusion
    • Preserved LV function
    • Short-term and long-term treatment with beta-blockers, aspirin, and ACE inhibitors
  • Poorer prognosis is associated with the following:
    • Delayed or unsuccessful reperfusion
    • LV function is the strongest predictor of outcome in the post-MI patient.
  • Ventricular dysrhythmias
    • Recent experience with amiodarone suggests that it may improve long-term mortality in survivors of MI with ectopy and ventricular tachycardia.

Patient Education

  • For excellent patient education resources, see eMedicine's Cholesterol Center. Also, visit eMedicine's patient education articles Chest Pain, Coronary Heart Disease, and Heart Attack.
  • All patients must be educated on the need to call 911 for symptoms and signs of ACS or MI.
  • All patients must be aggressively encouraged to quit smoking.

Miscellaneous

Medicolegal Pitfalls

  • Failure to diagnose MI can result in costly litigation. In most studies, this diagnosis accounts for the largest sum of dollars paid out. The often-grim outcome also adds a major emotional cost for clinicians involved in litigation.
  • Attribution of epigastric or chest symptoms from myocardial ischemia to a GI source may lead to litigation. Often, this is done despite the presence of dyspnea or diaphoresis, symptoms that are difficult to attribute to the GI system. Additionally, patients with myocardial ischemia may report relief or improvement with GI remedies (eg, antacids). Remember that even myocardial ischemia can worsen with recumbency (eg, angina decubitus) because of an increase in venous return and a temporary greater workload.
  • Attribution of the discomfort of myocardial ischemia to a musculoskeletal etiology may lead to litigation. Tenderness of the chest wall is reported in as many as 5% of patients who prove to have an MI. If no injury or event is defined that could have led to a soft tissue injury, the clinician should be reluctant to render a diagnosis of musculoskeletal chest pain.
  • Aortic dissection can also be a pitfall if a retrograde dissection is present. The dissection may extend to the pericardial sac and produce cardiac tamponade or disrupt the origin of a coronary artery producing STEMI as a complication of dissection. Thrombolytics administration to such a patient could produce disastrous results.
  • Younger patients are overly represented in cases of missed MI. Most likely, this is because of the inherent bias that this is a disease of those who are late middle-aged and older. Approach each patient with chest symptoms as an individual who could have the disease.
  • ECG misinterpretation
    • Unfortunately, in a series of missed MI, the failure to recognize ischemic changes is frequent. The inferior leads, in particular, must be scrutinized carefully for any evidence of ST-segment elevation by using a straight edge across the T-P segments.
    • Another common error is to recognize ischemic changes and then discharge the patient without definitively proving that the changes were pre-existent. Nonischemic causes of ST-segment elevation include LVH, pericarditis, ventricular-paced rhythms, hypothermia, hyperkalemia, and LV aneurysm. Nonischemic causes may lead to over treatment.
  • Failure to diagnose an MI in the setting of a left bundle-branch block may lead to litigation. Criteria for the diagnosis are as follows:

1.      ST-segment elevation greater than 1 mm and concordant with QRS complex

2.      ST-segment depression greater than 1 mm in lead V1, V2, or V3

3.      ST-segment elevation greater than 5 mm and discordant with QRS complex

These criteria have been assigned a score from 1-5. A score of 3 is necessary for a specificity for MI of 90%. The first criterion is scored a 5, the second is scored a 3, and the third is scored a 2.

  • Delays or failure to administer thrombolytics or to initiate PCI may lead to litigation.
    • This is usually because of delays in ECG performance, interpretation, and decision-making, and it is also affected by the availability of thrombolytics in ED.
    • Excluding patients based on age alone will deny some the significant benefit of thrombolysis.
 


More on Myocardial Infarction

Overview: Myocardial Infarction
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Myocardial Infarction
Treatment & Medication: Myocardial Infarction
Follow-up: Myocardial Infarction
Multimedia: Myocardial Infarction
References

References

  1. [Best Evidence] Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S, Steuer S, Stelzig C, Hartwiger S, et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med. Aug 27 2009;361(9):858-67. [Medline].

  2. [Best Evidence] Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Chen J, Wang Y, Nallamothu BK, Epstein AJ, et al. Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study. BMJ. May 19 2009;338:b1807. [Medline].

  3. Antithrombotic Trialists' (ATT) Collaboration. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. May 30 2009;373(9678):1849-1860. [Medline][Full Text].

  4. Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, Ducas J, Heffernan M, Cohen EA, et al. Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. Jun 25 2009;360(26):2705-18. [Medline].

  5. Abbott BG, Wackers FJ. Use of radionuclide imaging in acute coronary syndromes. Curr Cardiol Rep. Jan 2003;5(1):25-31. [Medline].

  6. [Guideline] AHA with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 7: the era of reperfusion: section 1: acute coronary syndromes (acute myocardial infarction). The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation. Aug 22 2000;102(8 Suppl):I172-203. [Medline].

  7. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3):959-69. [Medline].

  8. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Thayssen P, et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. Aug 21 2003;349(8):733-42. [Medline].

  9. [Guideline] Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 4 2004;44(3):671-719. [Medline].

  10. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, Schactman M, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, et al. Cardiac-specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. Oct 31 1996;335(18):1342-9. [Medline].

  11. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT-2) Investigators, Van De Werf F, Adgey J, Ardissino D, Armstrong PW, Aylward P, et al. Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. Aug 28 1999;354(9180):716-22. [Medline].

  12. Bholasingh R, de Winter RJ, Fischer JC, Koster RW, Peters RJ, Sanders GT. Safe discharge from the cardiac emergency room with a rapid rule-out myocardial infarction protocol using serial CK-MB(mass). Heart. Feb 2001;85(2):143-8. [Medline].

  13. Boersma E, Mercado N, Poldermans D, Gardien M, Vos J, Simoons ML. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. Mar 8 2003;361(9360):847-58. [Medline].

  14. [Guideline] Braunwald. Management of Patients with Unstable Angina and ST-Segment Elevation MI, A report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. November 2002.

  15. Brogan GX Jr, Vuori J, Friedman S, McCuskey CF, Thode HC Jr, Vaananen HK, et al. Improved specificity of myoglobin plus carbonic anhydrase assay versus that of creatine kinase-MB for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. Jan 1996;27(1):22-8. [Medline].

  16. Brown AL, Mann NC, Daya M, Goldberg R, Meischke H, Taylor J, et al. Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) study. Circulation. Jul 11 2000;102(2):173-8. [Medline].

  17. de Torbal A, Boersma E, Kors JA, van Herpen G, Deckers JW, van der Kuip DA, et al. Incidence of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in men and women aged 55 and older: the Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J. Mar 2006;27(6):729-36. [Medline].

  18. Fesmire FM, Hughes AD, Fody EP, Jackson AP, Fesmire CE, Gilbert MA, et al. The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. Dec 2002;40(6):584-94. [Medline].

  19. FTT Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group. Lancet. Feb 5 1994;343(8893):311-22. [Medline].

  20. [Best Evidence] Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, Abrams KR, Stevens SE, Uren NG, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. Dec 29 2005;353(26):2758-68. [Medline].

  21. Gibbons RJ, Holmes DR, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, Hopfenspirger MR, Gersh BJ. Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. The Mayo Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory Groups. N Engl J Med. Mar 11 1993;328(10):685-91. [Medline].

  22. GISSI. Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Lancet. Feb 22 1986;1(8478):397-402. [Medline].

  23. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, Stone GW, O'Keefe J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. Mar 11 1993;328(10):673-9. [Medline].

  24. GUSTO III Investigators. A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO III) Investigators. N Engl J Med. Oct 16 1997;337(16):1118-23. [Medline].

  25. GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigators. N Engl J Med. Sep 2 1993;329(10):673-82. [Medline].

  26. Hennekens CH, Albert CM, Godfried SL, Gaziano JM, Buring JE. Adjunctive drug therapy of acute myocardial infarction--evidence from clinical trials. N Engl J Med. Nov 28 1996;335(22):1660-7. [Medline].

  27. International Study Group. In-hospital mortality and clinical course of 20,891 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction randomised between alteplase and streptokinase with or without heparin. The International Study Group. Lancet. Jul 14 1990;336(8707):71-5. [Medline].

  28. Kannel WB. Silent myocardial ischemia and infarction: insights from the Framingham Study. Cardiol Clin. Nov 1986;4(4):583-91. [Medline].

  29. Kwong RY, Schussheim AE, Rekhraj S, Aletras AH, Geller N, Davis J, et al. Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. Feb 4 2003;107(4):531-7. [Medline].

  30. Newby LK, Rutsch WR, Califf RM, Simoons ML, Aylward PE, Armstrong PW, et al. Time from symptom onset to treatment and outcomes after thrombolytic therapy. GUSTO-1 Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 1996;27(7):1646-55. [Medline].

  31. Ohman EM, Armstrong PW, Christenson RH, Granger CB, Katus HA, Hamm CW, et al. Cardiac troponin T levels for risk stratification in acute myocardial ischemia. GUSTO IIA Investigators. N Engl J Med. Oct 31 1996;335(18):1333-41. [Medline].

  32. Ohman EM, Armstrong PW, White HD, Granger CB, Wilcox RG, Weaver WD, et al. Risk stratification with a point-of-care cardiac troponin T test in acute myocardial infarction. GUSTOIII Investigators. Global Use of Strategies To Open Occluded Coronary Arteries. Am J Cardiol. Dec 1 1999;84(11):1281-6. [Medline].

  33. Rogers WJ, Canto JG, Lambrew CT, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Kinkaid B, Shoultz DA, et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 2000;36(7):2056-63. [Medline].

  34. [Guideline] Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Braniff BA, Brooks NH, Califf RM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 1 1996;28(5):1328-428. [Medline].

  35. Saleh SS, Hannan EL, Ting L. A multistate comparison of patient characteristics, outcomes, and treatment practices in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. Nov 1 2005;96(9):1190-6. [Medline].

  36. Schömig A, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, Mehilli J, Schricke U, Pache J, et al. Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. Aug 10 2000;343(6):385-91. [Medline].

  37. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, Underwood DA, Gates KB, Topol EJ, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med. Feb 22 1996;334(8):481-7. [Medline].

  38. [Guideline] Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB 3rd, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 3 2006;47(1):216-35. [Medline].

  39. SPEED Group. Trial of abciximab with and without low-dose reteplase for acute myocardial infarction. Strategies for Patency Enhancement in the Emergency Department (SPEED) Group. Circulation. Jun 20 2000;101(24):2788-94. [Medline].

  40. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Furberg CD. Effects of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from randomized controlled trials. JAMA. Oct 6 1993;270(13):1589-95. [Medline].

  41. Tsai TN, Yang SP, Tsao TP, Huang KA, Cheng SM. Delayed diagnosis of post-traumatic acute myocardial infarction complicated by congestive heart failure. J Emerg Med. Nov 2005;29(4):429-31. [Medline].

  42. Van de Werf F, Cannon CP, Luyten A, Houbracken K, McCabe CH, Berioli S, et al. Safety assessment of single-bolus administration of TNK tissue-plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-1 trial. The ASSENT-1 Investigators. Am Heart J. May 1999;137(5):786-91. [Medline].

  43. Vantrimpont P, Rouleau JL, Wun CC, Ciampi A, Klein M, Sussex B, et al. Additive beneficial effects of beta-blockers to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) Study. SAVE Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 1997;29(2):229-36. [Medline].

  44. Wallentin L, Goldstein P, Armstrong PW, Granger CB, Adgey AA, Arntz HR, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in the prehospital setting: the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. Jul 15 2003;108(2):135-42. [Medline].

  45. Wilcken DE. Overview of inherited metabolic disorders causing cardiovascular disease. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2003;26(2-3):245-57. [Medline].

  46. Wilcox RG, von der Lippe G, Olsson CG, Jensen G, Skene AM, Hampton JR. Trial of tissue plasminogen activator for mortality reduction in acute myocardial infarction. Anglo-Scandinavian Study of Early Thrombolysis (ASSET). Lancet. Sep 3 1988;2(8610):525-30. [Medline].

  47. World Health Organization. Third Monitoring Report of the World Health Organization. 1991-93.

  48. Yuichi S, Takako I, Fumio I, Akihiro Y, Takahiro F, Toshiyuki H, et al. Detection of atherosclerotic coronary artery plaques by multislice spiral computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: report of 2 cases. Circ J. Mar 2004;68(3):263-6. [Medline].

  49. Zeymer U, Tebbe U, Essen R, Haarmann W, Neuhaus KL. Influence of time to treatment on early infarct-related artery patency after different thrombolytic regimens. ALKK-Study Group. Am Heart J. Jan 1999;137(1):34-8. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

signs of myocardial infarction, symptoms of myocardial infarction, non stemi myocardial infarction, MI, acute myocardial infarction, AMI, heart attack, chest pain, hypertension, mitral regurgitation, dysrhythmias, acute valvular dysfunction, congestive heart failure, CHF, third heart sound, fourth heart sound, heart block, emboli, right ventricular failure, cannon jugular venous a waves, left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery vasospasm, acute coronary syndrome

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Drew Evan Fenton, MD, Hospitalist, Our Health Care Consultants
Drew Evan Fenton, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Robert M McNamara, MD, FAAEM, Chair and Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine
Robert M McNamara, MD, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Medical Association, Pennsylvania Medical Society, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Gary Setnik, MD, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital; Assistant Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Gary Setnik, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, National Association of EMS Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: SironaHealth Salary Management position; South Middlesex EMS Consortium Salary Management position

CME Editor

John D Halamka, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

David FM Brown, MD, Assistant Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Vice Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
David FM Brown, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.