Background
Sinus bradycardia can be defined as a sinus rhythm with a resting heart rate of 60 beats per minute or less. However, few patients actually become symptomatic until their heart rate drops to less than 50 beats per minute. The action potential responsible for this rhythm arises from the sinus node and causes a P wave on the surface ECG that is normal in terms of both amplitude and vector. These P waves are typically followed by a normal QRS complex and T wave.
Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of sinus bradycardia is dependent on the underlying cause. Commonly, sinus bradycardia is an incidental finding in otherwise healthy individuals, particularly in young adults or sleeping patients. Other causes of sinus bradycardia are related to increased vagal tone.
Physiologic causes of increased vagal tone include the bradycardia seen in athletes. Pathologic causes include, but are not limited to, inferior wall myocardial infarction, toxic or environmental exposure, electrolyte disorders, infection, sleep apnea, drug effects, hypoglycemia, hypothyroidism, and increased intracranial pressure.
Sinus bradycardia may also be caused by the sick sinus syndrome, which involves a dysfunction in the ability of the sinus node to generate or transmit an action potential to the atria. Sick sinus syndrome includes a variety of disorders and pathologic processes that are grouped within one loosely defined clinical syndrome. The syndrome includes signs and symptoms related to cerebral hypoperfusion in association with sinus bradycardia, sinus arrest, sinoatrial (SA) block, carotid hypersensitivity, or alternating episodes of bradycardia and tachycardia.
Sick sinus syndrome most commonly occurs in elderly patients with concomitant cardiovascular disease and follows an unpredictable course. Some studies have shown that these patients have a functional decrease in the number of nodal cells, while others have demonstrated the presence of antinodal antibodies. Although these and other developments are beginning to focus our understanding of this syndrome, most cases remain idiopathic.
SA block occurs when the SA node fails to excite the atria uniformly. SA block may be associated with abnormal intrinsic nodal function, a failure of the SA junction, or a failure of propagation in the surrounding tissue. The 3 forms of SA block are first-, second-, and third-degree block.
Both first- and third-degree SA blocks are essentially undiagnosable on the surface ECG. First-degree SA block is characterized by a delay in the propagation of the action potential from the SA node to the atria. Unlike first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, this delay is not reflected in the surface ECG. In third-degree, or complete, SA block, the surface ECG is identical to that of sinus arrest, with absent P waves. Second-degree SA block is characterized by an occasional dropped P wave (analogous to the dropped QRS complex of second-degree AV block), reflecting the inability of the SA node to consistently transmit an action potential to the surrounding myocardium.
Epidemiology
Frequency
United States
Frequency of sinus bradycardia is unknown, given that most cases represent normal variants. Although the frequency of sick sinus syndrome is unknown in the general population, in cardiac patients it has been estimated to be 3 in 5000.
Mortality/Morbidity
Sequelae of sinus bradycardia are related to its underlying etiology.
- In patients who present with toxic exposure, the prognosis is good once the offending agent has been removed.
- Patients with sick sinus syndrome have a relatively poor prognosis, with 5-year survival rates in the range of 47-69%. However, whether this mortality rate is due to factors intrinsic to the sinus node itself or the concomitant heart disease is unclear.
[Guideline] Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 27 2008;51(21):e1-62. [Medline]. [Full Text].
[Guideline] Field JM, Hazinski MF, Sayre MR, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Hemphill R, et al. Part 1: executive summary: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. Nov 2 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S640-56. [Medline].
Grantham HJ. Emergency management of acute cardiac arrhythmias. Aust Fam Physician. Jul 2007;36(7):492-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Bharati S, Nordenberg A, Bauernfiend R, Varghese JP, Carvalho AG, Rosen K, et al. The anatomic substrate for the sick sinus syndrome in adolescence. Am J Cardiol. Jul 1980;46(1):163-72. [Medline].
Chokshi DS, Mascarenhas E, Samet P, Center S. Treatment of sinoatrial rhythm disturbances with permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol. Aug 1973;32(2):215-20. [Medline].
Davies MJ, Pomerance A. Quantitative study of ageing changes in the human sinoatrial node and internodal tracts. Br Heart J. Feb 1972;34(2):150-2. [Medline].
Ferrer MI. The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease. JAMA. Oct 14 1968;206(3):645-6. [Medline].
Gann D, Tolentino A, Samet P. Electrophysiologic evaluation of elderly patients with sinus bradycardia: a long-term follow-up study. Ann Intern Med. Jan 1979;90(1):24-9. [Medline].
Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Norris C, Yee R. The etiology of syncope in patients with negative tilt table and electrophysiological testing. Circulation. Oct 1 1995;92(7):1819-24. [Medline].
Kulbertus HE, De Leval-Rutten F, Demoulin JC. Sino-atrial disease: a report on 13 cases. J Electrocardiol. 1973;6(4):303-12. [Medline].
Maisch B, Lotze U, Schneider J, Kochsiek K. Antibodies to human sinus node in sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. Nov 1986;9(6 Pt 2):1101-9. [Medline].
Margolis JR, Strauss HC, Miller HC, Gilbert M, Wallace AG. Digitalis and the sick sinus syndrome. Clinical and electrophysiologic documentation of severe toxic effect on sinus node function. Circulation. Jul 1975;52(1):162-9. [Medline].
Mills TA, Kawji MM, Cataldo VD, Pappas ND, O'Meallie LP, Breaux DM, et al. Profound sinus bradycardia due to diltiazem, verapamil, and/or beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. J La State Med Soc. Nov-Dec 2004;156(6):327-31. [Medline].
Pollock G, Brady WJ Jr, Hargarten S, DeSilvey D, Carner CT. Hypoglycemia manifested by sinus bradycardia: a report of three cases. Acad Emerg Med. Jul 1996;3(7):700-7. [Medline].
Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schüller H. Atrial versus ventricular pacing in sinus node disease: a treatment comparison study. Am Heart J. Feb 1986;111(2):292-7. [Medline].
Sasaki Y, Shimotori M, Akahane K, Yonekura H, Hirano K, Endoh R, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison of clinical aspects among unpaced, ventricular inhibited paced, and physiologically paced groups. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. Nov 1988;11(11 Pt 1):1575-83. [Medline].
Touboul P, Atallah G, Gressard A, Kirkorian G. Effects of amiodarone on sinus node in man. Br Heart J. Nov 1979;42(5):573-8. [Medline].
Watt AH. Sick sinus syndrome: an adenosine-mediated disease. Lancet. Apr 6 1985;1(8432):786-8. [Medline].

