Electrical Injuries in Emergency Medicine
- Author: Tracy A Cushing, MD, MPH, FACEP, FAWM; Chief Editor: Rick Kulkarni, MD more...
Background
Electrical injuries, although relatively uncommon, are inevitably encountered by most emergency physicians. Adult electrical injuries usually occur in an occupational setting, whereas children are primarily injured in the household setting. The spectrum of electrical injury is very broad, ranging from minimal injury to severe multiorgan involvement, with both occult and delayed complications, to death.
Electrical injuries are shown in the images below.
Grounded sites of low-voltage injury on the feet.
Electrical burns to the hand. Approximately 1000 deaths per year are due to electrical injuries in the United States, with a mortality rate of 3-5%.[1] Classifications of electrical injuries generally focus on the power source (lightning or electrical), voltage (high or low voltage), and type of current (alternating or direct), each of which is associated with certain injury patterns.
This article reviews the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of electrical injuries caused by manufactured electricity; for further information on lightning injuries, please see Lightning Injuries.
Pathophysiology
Electricity is generated by the flow of electrons across a potential gradient from high to low concentration through a conductive material. The voltage (V) represents the magnitude of this potential difference and is usually determined by the electrical source. The type and extent of an electrical injury is determined by voltage, current strength, resistance to flow, the duration of contact with the source, the pathway of flow, and the type of current (ie, direct or alternating).
Voltage
Electrical injuries are typically divided into high-voltage and low-voltage injuries, using 500V or 1000V as the cutoff. High morbidity and mortality has been described in 600V direct current injury associated with railroad "third rail" contact.[2] In the United States and Canada, typical household electricity provides 110V for general use and 240V for high-powered appliances, while industrial electrical and high-tension power lines can have more than 100,000V.[3] Voltage is directly proportional to current and indirectly proportional to resistance, as expressed by Ohm's Law:
V = I X R; where I = current, V = voltage, R = resistance.
Current
The volume of electrons flowing across the potential gradient is the current, which is measured in amperes (I). It is a measure of the amount of energy that flows through a body–energy is perceptible to the touch at a current as low as 1 mA. A narrow range exists between perceptible current and the "let go" current–the maximum current at which a person can grasp the current and then release it before muscle tetany makes letting go impossible. The "let go" current for the average child is 3-5 mA; this is well below the 15-30 A of common household circuit breakers. For adults, the "let go" current is 6-9 mA, slightly higher for men than for women. Skeletal muscle tetany occurs at 16-20 mA. Ventricular fibrillation can occur at currents of 50-100 mA.[4]
Resistance
The impedance to flow of electrons across the gradient is the resistance (R) and varies depending on the electrolyte and water content of the body tissue through which electricity is being conducted. Blood vessels, muscles, and nerves have high electrolyte and water content, and thus low resistance, and are good conductors of electricity–better than bone, fat, and skin.[5] Heavily calloused areas of skin are excellent resistors, whereas a moderate amount of water or sweat on the skin surface can decrease its resistance significantly.
Type of circuit
Electrical current can flow in 1 of 2 types of circuits: direct current (DC) or alternating current (AC), in which the flow of electrons changes direction in rhythmic fashion. AC is the most common type of electricity in homes and offices, standardized to a frequency of 60 cycles/sec (Hz).
High-voltage DC often causes a large single muscle contraction that throws the victim away from the source; thus, usually only brief duration of contact occurs with the source flow. In contrast, AC of the same voltage is considered to be approximately 3 times more dangerous than DC, because the cyclic flow of electrons causes muscle tetany that tends to prolong victims' exposure to the source. Muscle tetany occurs when fibers are stimulated at 40-110 Hz; thus, the standard 60 Hz of household current is within that range. If the source contact point is the hand, when tetanic muscle contraction occurs the extremity flexors contract, causing the victim to grasp the current and bring it closer to the body causing prolonged contact with the source.
Table 1. Physiologic Effects of Different Electrical Currents (Open Table in a new window)
| Effect | Current (milliamps) |
| Tingling sensation/perception | 1-4 |
| Let-go current – Children | 3-4 |
| Let-go current - Women | 6-8 |
| Let-go current – Men | 7-9 |
| Skeletal muscle tetany | 16-20 |
| Respiratory muscle paralysis | 20-50 |
| Ventricular fibrillation | 50-120 |
Types of electrical burns
Depending on the voltage, current, pathway, duration of contact, and type of circuit, electrical burns can cause a variety of injuries through several different mechanisms.
A histologic picture of an electrical burn is shown below.
A histologic picture of an electrical burn showing elongated pyknotic keratinocyte nuclei with vertical streaming and homogenization of the dermal collagen (40X). Courtesy of Elizabeth Satter, MD. - Direct contact: Current passing directly through the body will heat the tissue causing electrothermal burns, both to the surface of the skin as well as deeper tissues, depending on their resistance. It will typically cause damage at the source contact point and the ground contact point. Contact burns are shown in the image below.
Contact electrical burns, 120-V alternating current nominal. The right knee was the energized side, and the left was ground. These are contact burns and are difficult to distinguish from thermal burns. Note entrance and exit are not viable concepts in alternating current. - Electrical arcs: Current sparks are formed between objects of different electric potential that are not in direct contact with each other, most often a highly charged source and a ground. The temperature of an electrical arc can reach 2500-5000o C, resulting in deep thermal burns where it contacts the skin. These are high-voltage injuries that may cause both thermal and flame burns in addition to injury from direct current along the arc pathway.
- Flame: Ignition of clothing causes direct burns from flames. Both electrothermal and arcing currents can ignite clothing.
- Flash: When heat from a nearby electrical arc causes thermal burns but current does not actually enter the body, the result is a flash burn. Flash burns may cover a large surface area of the body but are usually only partial thickness.
Epidemiology
Frequency
United States
Electrical injuries are estimated to cause approximately 500-1000 deaths per year in the United States.[3, 4] They are responsible for 3-5% of all burn unit admissions and cause 2-3% of emergency department burn visits in the pediatric population. Between 3% and 5% of burn unit admissions are associated with electrical burns.
Some evidence exists that the incidence of low-voltage injuries among children is declining, perhaps because of widespread use of ground fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs), but rates of high-voltage injuries, usually involving power lines or rail sources, has remained steady.[6] Due to the nature of occupational hazards with electricity, electrical injuries represent the fourth leading cause of work-related traumatic death (5-6% of all workers' deaths).[7]
Mortality/Morbidity
Morbidity and mortality are largely affected by the particular type of electrical contact involved in each exposure. Overall mortality is estimated to be 3-15%.[1, 8] Flash burns have a better prognosis than arc or conductive burns.[5]
Persons who experience low-voltage injuries without immediate cardiac or respiratory arrest have low mortality, but there may be significant morbidity from oral trauma in children who bite electrical cords[9] or adults who suffer burns to the hand.
Persons who experience low-voltage injuries with cardiac or respiratory arrest may recover completely with immediate CPR on scene; however, prolonged CPR and transport time may result in permanent brain damage.
High-voltage injuries often produce severe burns and blunt trauma. Patients are at high risk of myoglobinuria and renal failure. Burns are often ultimately much worse than they initially appear in the ED.
Race
No racial susceptibility to electrical burns exists. Occupational trends show more Caucasian tradespeople in high-risk occupations, and therefore Caucasians are more likely than other races in the United States to experience occupation-related electrical injuries.
Sex
Rates of childhood electrical injury are higher among boys than girls[6] ; rates of adult injury are significantly higher in men than in women, likely because of occupational predisposition. Most series show more than 80% of electrical injuries occur in men.[8, 10, 11, 12]
Age
A bimodal distribution of electrical injuries exists among the very young (children < 6 y) and among young and working-aged adults.[13] Patterns of electrical injury vary by age (eg, low-voltage household exposures among toddlers and high-voltage exposures among risk-taking adolescents and via occupational exposure).[14, 13]
Lee RC. Injury by electrical forces: pathophysiology, manifestations, and therapy. Curr Probl Surg. Sep 1997;34(9):677-764. [Medline].
Rabban J, Adler J, Rosen C, Blair J, Sheridan R. Electrical injury from subway third rails: serious injury associated with intermediate voltage contact. Burns. Sep 1997;23(6):515-8. [Medline].
Spies C, Trohman RG. Narrative review: Electrocution and life-threatening electrical injuries. Ann Intern Med. Oct 3 2006;145(7):531-7. [Medline].
Koumbourlis AC. Electrical injuries. Crit Care Med. Nov 2002;30(11 Suppl):S424-30. [Medline].
Price T, Cooper MA. Electrical and Lighting Injuries. In: Marx J, Hockberger R, Walls R. Rosen's Emergency Medicine. Vol 3. 5th ed. Mosby; 2002:2010-2020.
Rai J, Jeschke MG, Barrow RE, Herndon DN. Electrical injuries: a 30-year review. J Trauma. May 1999;46(5):933-6. [Medline].
Casini V. Worker Deaths by Electrocution: A summary of NIOSH Surveillance and Investigative Findings. Washington DC: Department of Health and Human Services (NIOSH); May 1998. 5-8.
Luz DP, Millan LS, Alessi MS, et al. Electrical burns: a retrospective analysis across a 5-year period. Burns. Nov 2009;35(7):1015-9. [Medline].
Thomas SS. Electrical burns of the mouth: still searching for an answer. Burns. Mar 1996;22(2):137-40. [Medline].
Ferreiro I, Melendez J, Regalado J, Bejar FJ, Gabilondo FJ. Factors influencing the sequelae of high tension electrical injuries. Burns. Nov 1998;24(7):649-53. [Medline].
Kopp J, Loos B, Spilker G, Horch RE. Correlation between serum creatinine kinase levels and extent of muscle damage in electrical burns. Burns. Nov 2004;30(7):680-3. [Medline].
Hussmann J, Kucan JO, Russell RC, Bradley T, Zamboni WA. Electrical injuries--morbidity, outcome and treatment rationale. Burns. Nov 1995;21(7):530-5. [Medline].
Baker MD, Chiaviello C. Household electrical injuries in children. Epidemiology and identification of avoidable hazards. Am J Dis Child. Jan 1989;143(1):59-62. [Medline].
Rabban JT, Blair JA, Rosen CL, Adler JN, Sheridan RL. Mechanisms of pediatric electrical injury. New implications for product safety and injury prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Jul 1997;151(7):696-700. [Medline].
Ordog GJ, Wasserberger J, Schlater T, Balasubramanium S. Electronic gun (Taser) injuries. Ann Emerg Med. Jan 1987;16(1):73-8. [Medline].
Sloane CM, Chan TC, Levine SD, Dunford JV, Neuman T, Vilke GM. Serum troponin I measurement of subjects exposed to the Taser X-26. J Emerg Med. Jul 2008;35(1):29-32. [Medline].
Cevik C, Otahbachi M, Miller E, Bagdure S, Nugent KM. Acute stress cardiomyopathy and deaths associated with electronic weapons. Int J Cardiol. Mar 6 2009;132(3):312-7. [Medline].
Bozeman WP, Hauda WE 2nd, Heck JJ, Graham DD Jr, Martin BP, Winslow JE. Safety and injury profile of conducted electrical weapons used by law enforcement officers against criminal suspects. Ann Emerg Med. Apr 2009;53(4):480-9. [Medline].
Strote J, Walsh M, Angelidis M, Basta A, Hutson HR. Conducted Electrical Weapon Use by Law Enforcement: An Evaluation of Safety and Injury. J Trauma. Dec 22 2009;[Medline].
Robb M, Close B, Furyk J, Aitken P. Review article: Emergency Department implications of the TASER. Emerg Med Australas. Aug 2009;21(4):250-8. [Medline].
Jensen PJ, Thomsen PE, Bagger JP, Norgaard A, Baandrup U. Electrical injury causing ventricular arrhythmias. Br Heart J. Mar 1987;57(3):279-83. [Medline].
Dawes DM, Ho JD, Reardon RF, Miner JR. Echocardiographic evaluation of TASER X26 probe deployment into the chests of human volunteers. Am J Emerg Med. Jan 2010;28(1):49-55. [Medline].
Claudet I, Marechal C, Debuisson C, Salanne S. [Risk of arrhythmia and domestic low-voltage electrical injury.]. Arch Pediatr. Feb 26 2010;[Medline].
Saffle JR, Crandall A, Warden GD. Cataracts: a long-term complication of electrical injury. J Trauma. Jan 1985;25(1):17-21. [Medline].
Haberal MA. An eleven-year survey of electrical burn injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil. Jan-Feb 1995;16(1):43-8. [Medline].
Rosen CL, Adler JN, Rabban JT, et al. Early predictors of myoglobinuria and acute renal failure following electrical injury. J Emerg Med. Sep-Oct 1999;17(5):783-9. [Medline].
Bailey B, Gaudreault P, Thivierge RL. Cardiac monitoring of high-risk patients after an electrical injury: a prospective multicentre study. Emerg Med J. May 2007;24(5):348-52. [Medline].
Dollery W. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal infirmary. Management of household electrical injury. J Accid Emerg Med. Jul 1998;15(4):228. [Medline].
Chen EH, Sareen A. Do children require ECG evaluation and inpatient telemetry after household electrical exposures?. Ann Emerg Med. Jan 2007;49(1):64-7. [Medline].
Bracken TD, Kavet R, Patterson RM, Fordyce TA. An integrated job exposure matrix for electrical exposures of utility workers. J Occup Environ Hyg. Aug 2009;6(8):499-509. [Medline].
Achauer BM, Martinez SE. Burn wound pathophysiology and care. Crit Care Clin. Mar 1985;1(1):47-58. [Medline].
Bailey B, Gaudreault P, Thivierge RL. Cardiac monitoring of high-risk patients after an electrical injury: a prospective multicentre study. Emerg Med J. May 2007;24(5):348-52. [Medline].
Bailey B, Gaudreault P, Thivierge RL. Neurologic and neuropsychological symptoms during the first year after an electric shock: results of a prospective multicenter study. Am J Emerg Med. May 2008;26(4):413-8. [Medline].
Baxter CR, Waeckerle JF. Emergency treatment of burn injury. Ann Emerg Med. Dec 1988;17(12):1305-15. [Medline].
Canady JW, Thompson SA, Bardach J. Oral commissure burns in children. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1996;97(4):738-44; discussion 745; 746-55. [Medline].
Colic M, Ristic L, Jovanovic M. Emergency treatment and early fluid resuscitation following electrical injuries. Acta Chir Plast. 1996;38(4):137-41. [Medline].
Cooper MA. Electrical and lightning injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Aug 1984;2(3):489-501. [Medline].
El-Badawy A, Mabrouk AR. Epidemiology of childhood burns in the burn unit of Ain Shams University in Cairo, Egypt. Burns. Dec 1998;24(8):728-32. [Medline].
Fish RM. Electric injury, part I: treatment priorities, subtle diagnostic factors, and burns. J Emerg Med. Nov-Dec 1999;17(6):977-83. [Medline].
Fish RM. Electric injury, part III: cardiac monitoring indications, the pregnant patient, and lightning. J Emerg Med. Feb 2000;18(2):181-7. [Medline].
Gomez R, Cancio LC. Management of burn wounds in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Feb 2007;25(1):135-46. [Medline].
Hammond JS, Ward CG. High-voltage electrical injuries: management and outcome of 60 cases. South Med J. Nov 1988;81(11):1351-2. [Medline].
Leibovici D, Shemer J, Shapira SC. Electrical injuries: current concepts. Injury. Nov 1995;26(9):623-7. [Medline].
Milano M. Oral electrical and thermal burns in children: review and report of case. ASDC J Dent Child. Mar-Apr 1999;66(2):116-9, 85. [Medline].
Singerman J, Gomez M, Fish JS. Long-term sequelae of low-voltage electrical injury. J Burn Care Res. Sep-Oct 2008;29(5):773-7. [Medline].
| Effect | Current (milliamps) |
| Tingling sensation/perception | 1-4 |
| Let-go current – Children | 3-4 |
| Let-go current - Women | 6-8 |
| Let-go current – Men | 7-9 |
| Skeletal muscle tetany | 16-20 |
| Respiratory muscle paralysis | 20-50 |
| Ventricular fibrillation | 50-120 |

