Electrical Injuries in Emergency Medicine Workup
- Author: Tracy A Cushing, MD, MPH, FACEP, FAWM; Chief Editor: Joe Alcock, MD, MS more...
In all patients with more than a trivial electrical injury and/or exposure, the following tests should be considered:
- CBC count - Hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell count
- Electrolytes - Sodium, potassium, chloride, carbon dioxide, blood urea nitrogen, glucose
- Creatinine - High risk of rhabdomyolysis/myoglobinuria in electrical injuries; mortality in one study was 59% for patients with acute renal failure
- Urinalysis - Specific gravity, pH, hematuria, and urine myoglobin if urinalysis is positive for hemoglobin
- Serum myoglobin - If urine is positive for myoglobin, a serum level should be obtained
- Arterial blood gas - To be obtained for patients needing ventilatory support, or those with severe rhabdomyolysis who require urine alkalinization therapy
- Creatine kinase (CK) levels
- This level may be extremely elevated in patients with massive muscle damage from high-voltage injuries. Normal CK values published by the laboratory may be low for typical construction and electrical workers whose vocation involves heavy exercise. Some evidence suggests that initial CK levels may help predict which patients could benefit from early fasciotomy to prevent subsequent amputations.
- CK-MB subfractions are also often elevated in electrical injuries, but their significance in the setting of electrical injuries is not known. CK-MB fractions and troponin should be checked if the current pathway involved the chest/thorax, if the patient has any signs of ischemia or arrhythmia on ECG, or if the patient has specific complaints of chest pain.
- One retrospective review created a decision rule for clinical identification of patients likely to have rhabdomyolysis. Multivariate modeling revealed that high-voltage exposure, prehospital cardiac arrest, full-thickness burns, and compartment syndrome were associated with myoglobinuria. Defining "positive" as ≥2 of these findings has a sensitivity of 96% and negative predictive value of 99%.
Choice of imaging studies is dictated by the presence of blunt trauma, altered mental status, cardiac or respiratory arrest, and type of electrical exposure. Studies to be considered are as follows:
- Chest radiography - Any patient with cardiac or respiratory arrest, shortness of breath, chest pain, hypoxia, CPR at the scene, or fall/blunt trauma
- Head computed tomography - Any patient with altered mental status, significant traumatic mechanism, seizure, loss of consciousness, or focal neurologic deficits
- Cervical/spine imaging - Patients with loss of consciousness or significant trauma should be cervical spine immobilized and imaged accordingly. Clinical clearance may be appropriate for some patients with normal mental status without significant injuries. Patients with focal neurologic deficits or evidence of spinal cord injury should undergo full spinal imaging.
- CT/ultrasonography - Depending on the amount of trauma sustained and the pathway of the current exposure, patients may require further imaging to evaluate for internal injuries. Imaging modality varies depending on suspected injury and availability.
All adult patients should have an initial ECG and cardiac monitoring in the ED. The duration of monitoring depends on the circumstances of the exposure; any patients with chest pain, arrhythmia, abnormal initial ECG, cardiac arrest, loss of consciousness, transthoracic conduction, or history of cardiac disease should undergo monitoring. No definitive guideline is available on duration of monitoring for adults, but patients are unlikely to develop significant arrhythmias after 24-48 hours if they have no other significant injuries. Several large reviews have not identified risk of delayed arrhythmia among patients with low-voltage exposure and no arrhythmia upon initial presentation. One such review of 196 exposures concludes that admission for cardiac monitoring is not indicated for such patients.
Several studies have shown that low-voltage (household) exposures in patients with no cardiac complaints and a normal initial ECG can be safely discharged. It is unclear how this applies to patients with preexisting heart disease. In the pediatric population, healthy children with household current exposures (120 to 140V, no water contact) can be safely discharged if they are asymptomatic, without a VF or cardiac arrest in the field, and have no other injuries requiring admission.[26, 32]
Obtain intravenous access in all adult patients with electrical injuries. Consider central access in any patient with significant trauma, large burns, cardiac or respiratory arrest, or loss of consciousness.
Fasciotomy of a burned extremity may be required in high-voltage injuries or prolonged low-voltage injuries. Obtain early surgical consultation, preferably with experience in burn management, early in the treatment of any patient with a high-voltage burn, since appropriate early fasciotomies may prevent subsequent amputations. If emergently indicated, fasciotomy should not be delayed.
Lee RC. Injury by electrical forces: pathophysiology, manifestations, and therapy. Curr Probl Surg. 1997 Sep. 34(9):677-764. [Medline].
Rabban J, Adler J, Rosen C, Blair J, Sheridan R. Electrical injury from subway third rails: serious injury associated with intermediate voltage contact. Burns. 1997 Sep. 23(6):515-8. [Medline].
Spies C, Trohman RG. Narrative review: Electrocution and life-threatening electrical injuries. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3. 145(7):531-7. [Medline].
Koumbourlis AC. Electrical injuries. Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov. 30(11 Suppl):S424-30. [Medline].
Price T, Cooper MA. Electrical and Lighting Injuries. Marx J, Hockberger R, Walls R. Rosen's Emergency Medicine. 5th ed. Mosby; 2002. Vol 3: 2010-2020.
Rai J, Jeschke MG, Barrow RE, Herndon DN. Electrical injuries: a 30-year review. J Trauma. 1999 May. 46(5):933-6. [Medline].
Casini V. Worker Deaths by Electrocution: A summary of NIOSH Surveillance and Investigative Findings. Department of Health and Human Services (NIOSH). May 1998.
Luz DP, Millan LS, Alessi MS, et al. Electrical burns: a retrospective analysis across a 5-year period. Burns. 2009 Nov. 35(7):1015-9. [Medline].
Ferreiro I, Melendez J, Regalado J, Bejar FJ, Gabilondo FJ. Factors influencing the sequelae of high tension electrical injuries. Burns. 1998 Nov. 24(7):649-53. [Medline].
Kopp J, Loos B, Spilker G, Horch RE. Correlation between serum creatinine kinase levels and extent of muscle damage in electrical burns. Burns. 2004 Nov. 30(7):680-3. [Medline].
Hussmann J, Kucan JO, Russell RC, Bradley T, Zamboni WA. Electrical injuries--morbidity, outcome and treatment rationale. Burns. 1995 Nov. 21(7):530-5. [Medline].
Kym D, Seo DK, Hur GY, Lee JW. Epidemiology of electrical injury: Differences between low- and high-voltage electrical injuries during a 7-year study period in South Korea. Scand J Surg. 2014 May 7. [Medline].
Baker MD, Chiaviello C. Household electrical injuries in children. Epidemiology and identification of avoidable hazards. Am J Dis Child. 1989 Jan. 143(1):59-62. [Medline].
Rabban JT, Blair JA, Rosen CL, Adler JN, Sheridan RL. Mechanisms of pediatric electrical injury. New implications for product safety and injury prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Jul. 151(7):696-700. [Medline].
Thomas SS. Electrical burns of the mouth: still searching for an answer. Burns. 1996 Mar. 22(2):137-40. [Medline].
Ordog GJ, Wasserberger J, Schlater T, Balasubramanium S. Electronic gun (Taser) injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1987 Jan. 16(1):73-8. [Medline].
Sloane CM, Chan TC, Levine SD, Dunford JV, Neuman T, Vilke GM. Serum troponin I measurement of subjects exposed to the Taser X-26. J Emerg Med. 2008 Jul. 35(1):29-32. [Medline].
Cevik C, Otahbachi M, Miller E, Bagdure S, Nugent KM. Acute stress cardiomyopathy and deaths associated with electronic weapons. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Mar 6. 132(3):312-7. [Medline].
Bozeman WP, Hauda WE 2nd, Heck JJ, Graham DD Jr, Martin BP, Winslow JE. Safety and injury profile of conducted electrical weapons used by law enforcement officers against criminal suspects. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr. 53(4):480-9. [Medline].
Strote J, Walsh M, Angelidis M, Basta A, Hutson HR. Conducted electrical weapon use by law enforcement: an evaluation of safety and injury. J Trauma. 2010 May. 68(5):1239-46. [Medline].
Robb M, Close B, Furyk J, Aitken P. Review article: Emergency Department implications of the TASER. Emerg Med Australas. 2009 Aug. 21(4):250-8. [Medline].
Kroll MW, Lakkireddy DR, Stone JR, Luceri RM. TASER electronic control devices and cardiac arrests: coincidental or causal?. Circulation. 2014 Jan 7. 129(1):93-100. [Medline].
Zipes DP. TASER electronic control devices can cause cardiac arrest in humans. Circulation. 2014 Jan 7. 129(1):101-11. [Medline].
Dawes DM, Ho JD, Reardon RF, Miner JR. Echocardiographic evaluation of TASER X26 probe deployment into the chests of human volunteers. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan. 28(1):49-55. [Medline].
Claudet I, Marechal C, Debuisson C, Salanne S. [Risk of arrhythmia and domestic low-voltage electrical injury]. Arch Pediatr. 2010 Apr. 17(4):343-9. [Medline].
Saffle JR, Crandall A, Warden GD. Cataracts: a long-term complication of electrical injury. J Trauma. 1985 Jan. 25(1):17-21. [Medline].
Haberal MA. An eleven-year survey of electrical burn injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Jan-Feb. 16(1):43-8. [Medline].
Rosen CL, Adler JN, Rabban JT, et al. Early predictors of myoglobinuria and acute renal failure following electrical injury. J Emerg Med. 1999 Sep-Oct. 17(5):783-9. [Medline].
Bailey B, Gaudreault P, Thivierge RL. Cardiac monitoring of high-risk patients after an electrical injury: a prospective multicentre study. Emerg Med J. 2007 May. 24(5):348-52. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Dollery W. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal infirmary. Management of household electrical injury. J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Jul. 15(4):228. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Chen EH, Sareen A. Do children require ECG evaluation and inpatient telemetry after household electrical exposures?. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan. 49(1):64-7. [Medline].
Bracken TD, Kavet R, Patterson RM, Fordyce TA. An integrated job exposure matrix for electrical exposures of utility workers. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009 Aug. 6(8):499-509. [Medline].