Appendicitis Treatment & Management
- Author: Sandy Craig, MD; Chief Editor: Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP more...
Appendectomy remains the only curative treatment of appendicitis, but management of patients with an appendiceal mass can usually be divided into the following 3 treatment categories:
Patients with a phlegmon or a small abscess: After intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy, an interval appendectomy can be performed 4-6 weeks later.
Patients with a larger well-defined abscess: After percutaneous drainage with IV antibiotics is performed, the patient can be discharged with the catheter in place. Interval appendectomy can be performed after the fistula is closed.
Patients with a multicompartmental abscess: These patients require early surgical drainage.
Although many controversies exist over the nonoperative management of acute appendicitis, antibiotics have an important role in the treatment of patients with this condition. Antibiotics considered for patients with appendicitis must offer full aerobic and anaerobic coverage. The duration of the administration is closely related to the stage of appendicitis at the time of the diagnosis, considering either intraoperative findings or postoperative evolution. According to several studies, antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered before every appendectomy. When the patient becomes afebrile and the white blood cell (WBC) count normalizes, antibiotic treatment may be stopped. Cefotetan and cefoxitin seem to be the best choices of antibiotics. (See Medications).
Go to Pediatric Appendicitis for more information on this topic.
Emergency Department Care
The emergency department (ED) clinician must evaluate the larger group of patients who present to the ED with abdominal pain of all etiologies with the goal of approaching 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis in a time-, cost-, and consultation-efficient manner.
Establish IV access and administer aggressive crystalloid therapy to patients with clinical signs of dehydration or septicemia. Patients with suspected appendicitis should not receive anything by mouth.
Administer parenteral analgesic and antiemetic as needed for patient comfort. The administration of analgesics to patients with acute undifferentiated abdominal pain has historically been discouraged and criticized because of concerns that they render the physical findings less reliable. However, at least 8 randomized controlled studies have demonstrated that administering opioid analgesic medications to adult and pediatric patients with acute undifferentiated abdominal pain is safe; no study has shown that analgesics adversely affect the accuracy of physical examination. Factors associated with prescription of any analgesia and opioids are older age and payment source; in addition, use of computed tomography (CT) scanning was associated with prescription of analgesics.
Consider ectopic pregnancy in women of childbearing age, and obtain a qualitative beta–human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) measurement in all cases.
Administer intravenous antibiotics to those with signs of septicemia and to those who are to proceed to laparotomy.
Nonsurgical treatment may be useful when appendectomy is not accessible or when it is temporarily a high-risk procedure. Anecdotal reports describe the success of IV antibiotics in treating acute appendicitis in patients without access to surgical intervention (eg, submariners, individuals on ships at sea).
In a prospective study of 20 patients with ultrasonography-proven appendicitis, symptoms resolved in 95% of patients receiving antibiotics alone, but 37% of these patients had recurrent appendicitis within 14 months.
The Appendicitis Acuta (APPAC) trial, which compared antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in the treatment of 530 patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by computed tomography (CT), was not able to demonstrate noninferiority of antimicrobial management versus surgery.
Bonadio et al reported that of 203 children with perforated appendicitis, those who underwent early appendectomy (n = 122) had significantly better outcomes than those who received medical management (n = 81). The early appendectomy group had shorter hospitalization stays, received fewer parenteral antibiotics, underwent fewer radiologic studies and other invasive procedures (percutaneous drainage, central venous catherization), and had fewer inpatient febrile episodes, as well as had fewer postadmission intraabominal complications and/or fewer unscheduled postdischarge readmissions.
Preoperative antibiotics have demonstrated efficacy in decreasing postoperative wound infection rates in numerous prospective controlled studies, and they should be administered in conjunction with the surgical consultant. Broad-spectrum gram-negative and anaerobic coverage is indicated (see Medications).
Penicillin-allergic patients should avoid beta-lactamase type antibiotics and cephalosporins. Carbapenems are a good option in these patients.
Pregnant patients should receive pregnancy category A or B antibiotics.
Urgent Versus Emergent Appendectomy
A retrospective study suggested that the risk of appendiceal rupture is minimal in patients with less than 24-36 hours of untreated symptoms, and another retrospective study suggested that appendectomy within 12-24 hours of presentation is not associated with an increase in hospital length of stay, operative time, advanced stages of appendicitis, or complications compared with appendectomy performed within 12 hours of presentation.
Fair et al used data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project to evaluate 30-day morbidity and mortality of intervention (laparoscopic and open appendectomy) at different time periods (adjusted for preoperative risk factors) and found similar outcomes between when appendectomy was performed within 24 hours and when it was performed between 24-48 hours. However, a delay of operative intervention longer than 48 hours was associated with doubling of complication rates.
In a separate study, Boomer et al reported that delaying appendectomy (16 hours from presentation in the emergency department or 12 hours from inpatient admission) in children did not result in higher rates of surgical site infections.
Additional studies are needed to demonstrate whether initiation of antibiotic therapy followed by urgent appendectomy is as effective as emergent appendectomy for patients with unperforated appendicitis.
Emergent Versus Interval Surgery for Perforated Appendicitis
Historically, immediate (emergent) appendectomy was recommended for all patients with appendicitis, whether perforated or unperforated. More recent clinical experience suggests that patients with perforated appendicitis with mild symptoms and localized abscess or phlegmon on abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans can be initially treated with IV antibiotics and percutaneous or transrectal drainage of any localized abscess. If the patient's symptoms, WBC count, and fever satisfactorily resolve, therapy can be changed to oral antibiotics and the patient can be discharged home. Then, delayed (interval) appendectomy can be performed 4-8 weeks later.
The above approach is successful in the vast majority of patients with perforated appendicitis and localized symptoms. Some have suggested that interval appendectomy is not necessary, unless the patient presents with recurrent symptoms. Further studies are needed to clarify not only whether routine interval appendectomy is indicated but also to identify the optimal treatment strategy in patients with perforated appendicitis
Initially performed in 1987, laparoscopic appendectomy has been performed in thousands of patients and is successful in 90-94% of attempts. It has also been demonstrated that laparoscopic appendectomy is successful in approximately 90% of cases of perforated appendicitis. However, this procedure is contraindicated in patients with significant intra-abdominal adhesions.
According to the 2010 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guideline, the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy are identical to those for open appendectomy.
The 2010 SAGES guideline lists the following conditions as suitable for laparoscopic appendectomy :
Appendicitis in pediatric patients
Suspected appendicitis in pregnant women
According to the SAGES guideline, laparoscopic appendectomy may be the preferred approach in the following cases :
Appendicitis in elderly patients
Appendicitis in obese patients
The SAGES guideline states that the laparoscopic approach should be preferred in women of childbearing age with presumed appendicitis.
Diagnostic laparoscopy may be useful in selected cases (eg, infants, elderly patients, female patients) to confirm the diagnosis of appendicitis. This procedure has been suggested for pregnant patients in the first trimester with suspected appendicitis. If findings are positive, such procedures should be followed by definitive surgical treatment at the time of laparoscopy. Although negative appendectomy does not appear to adversely affect maternal or fetal health, diagnostic delay with perforation does increase fetal and maternal morbidity. Therefore, aggressive evaluation of the appendix is warranted in this group.
In a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 studies on laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy, Wilasrusmee et al found that laparoscopic appendicectomy in pregnant women was associated with a significantly greater risk of fetal loss. According to the SAGES guideline, if findings are negative (normal appendix) on laparoscopic approach, removal should be considered based on the patient’s clinical situation.
Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy include increased cosmetic satisfaction and a decrease in the postoperative wound-infection rate. Some studies show that laparoscopic appendectomy shortens the hospital stay and convalescent period compared with open appendectomy.
Disadvantages of laparoscopic appendectomy are increased cost and an operating time approximately 20 minutes longer than that of an open appendectomy; however, the latter may resolve with increasing experience with laparoscopic technique. The SAGES guideline recommends practicing a consistent operative method to reduce cost, operating time, and complications.
Complications of appendicitis may include wound infection, dehiscence, bowel obstruction, abdominal/pelvic abscess, and, rarely, death. Stump appendicitis also occurs rarely; however, at least 36 reported cases of appendicitis in the surgical stump after previous appendectomy exist.
In cases of suspected appendicitis, consult a general surgeon. The surgeon's goals are to evaluate a relatively small population of patients referred for suspected appendicitis and to minimize the negative appendectomy rate without increasing the incidence of perforation.
Polites SF, Mohamed MI, Habermann EB, et al. A simple algorithm reduces computed tomography use in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Surgery. 2014 Jun 19. [Medline].
Douglas D. Algorithm cuts pediatric CT use in suspected appendicitis. Reuters Health Information. July 10, 2014. [Full Text].
Yeh B. Evidence-based emergency medicine/rational clinical examination abstract. Does this adult patient have appendicitis?. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Sep. 52(3):301-3. [Medline].
Markle GB 4th. Heel-drop jarring test for appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1985 Feb. 120(2):243. [Medline].
Thimsen DA, Tong GK, Gruenberg JC. Prospective evaluation of C-reactive protein in patients suspected to have acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 1989 Jul. 55(7):466-8. [Medline].
de Carvalho BR, Diogo-Filho A, Fernandes C, Barra CB. [Leukocyte count, C reactive protein, alpha-1 acid glycoprotein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in acute appendicitis]. Arq Gastroenterol. 2003 Jan-Mar. 40(1):25-30. [Medline].
Albu E, Miller BM, Choi Y, et al. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Jan. 37(1):49-51. [Medline].
Bolandparvaz S, Vasei M, Owji AA, Ata-Ee N, Amin A, Daneshbod Y, et al. Urinary 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid as a test for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clin Biochem. 2004 Nov. 37(11):985-9. [Medline].
Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, Kim S, Lee YJ, Kim KP, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26. 366(17):1596-605. [Medline].
Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, Thiessen ME, Weingart SD, Decker WW. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jan. 55(1):71-116. [Medline].
[Guideline] National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC). Guideline summary: Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Rockville (MD). Available at http://guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=15598. Accessed: November 18, 2013.
Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, Warnock N, Berbaum KS. Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging. 1995 Mar-Apr. 20(2):149-51. [Medline].
Manterola C, Vial M, Moraga J, Astudillo P. Analgesia in patients with acute abdominal pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19. 1:CD005660. [Medline].
Karamanakos SN, Sdralis E, Panagiotopoulos S, Kehagias I. Laparoscopy in the emergency setting: a retrospective review of 540 patients with acute abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Apr. 20(2):119-24. [Medline].
Place RC. Acute urinary retention in a 9-year-old child: an atypical presentation of acute appendicitis. J Emerg Med. 2006 Aug. 31(2):173-5. [Medline].
Oto A, Ernst RD, Mileski WJ, Nishino TK, Le O, Wolfe GC, et al. Localization of appendix with MDCT and influence of findings on choice of appendectomy incision. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct. 187(4):987-90. [Medline].
Sedlak M, Wagner OJ, Wild B, Papagrigoriades S, Exadaktylos AK. Is there still a role for rectal examination in suspected appendicitis in adults?. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Mar. 26(3):359-60. [Medline].
Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986 May. 15(5):557-64. [Medline].
Schneider C, Kharbanda A, Bachur R. Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun. 49(6):778-84, 784.e1. [Medline].
Schneider C, Kharbanda A, Bachur R. Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun. 49(6):778-84, 784.e1. [Medline].
Migraine S, Atri M, Bret PM, Lough JO, Hinchey JE. Spontaneously resolving acute appendicitis: clinical and sonographic documentation. Radiology. 1997 Oct. 205(1):55-8. [Medline].
Cobben LP, de Van Otterloo AM, Puylaert JB. Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology. 2000 May. 215(2):349-52. [Medline].
Dueholm S, Bagi P, Bud M. Laboratory aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A blinded, prospective trial concerning diagnostic value of leukocyte count, neutrophil differential count, and C-reactive protein. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Oct. 32(10):855-9. [Medline].
Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Unalmiser S. Accuracy of serum C-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon's clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Dec. 38(12):1270-4. [Medline].
Shakhatreh HS. The accuracy of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with that of clinical diagnosis. Med Arh. 2000. 54(2):109-10. [Medline].
Asfar S, Safar H, Khoursheed M, Dashti H, al-Bader A. Would measurement of C-reactive protein reduce the rate of negative exploration for acute appendicitis?. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2000 Feb. 45(1):21-4. [Medline].
Erkasap S, Ates E, Ustuner Z, Sahin A, Yilmaz S, Yasar B, et al. Diagnostic value of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis. Swiss Surg. 2000. 6(4):169-72. [Medline].
Gronroos JM, Gronroos P. Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1999 Apr. 86(4):501-4. [Medline].
Ortega-Deballon P, Ruiz de Adana-Belbel JC, Hernandez-Matias A, Garcia-Septiem J, Moreno-Azcoita M. Usefulness of laboratory data in the management of right iliac fossa pain in adults. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jul. 51(7):1093-9. [Medline].
Gronroos JM. Is there a role for leukocyte and CRP measurements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly?. Maturitas. 1999 Mar 15. 31(3):255-8. [Medline].
Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, et al. Role of leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Am Surg. 2005 Apr. 71(4):344-7. [Medline].
Gronroos JM. Do normal leucocyte count and C-reactive protein value exclude acute appendicitis in children?. Acta Paediatr. 2001 Jun. 90(6):649-51. [Medline].
Stefanutti G, Ghirardo V, Gamba P. Inflammatory markers for acute appendicitis in children: are they helpful?. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 May. 42(5):773-6. [Medline].
Mohammed AA, Daghman NA, Aboud SM, Oshibi HO. The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage in childhood appendicitis. Saudi Med J. 2004 Sep. 25(9):1212-5. [Medline].
Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb. 76(1-2):71-4. [Medline].
Tundidor Bermudez AM, Amado Dieguez JA, Montes de Oca Mastrapa JL. [Urological manifestations of acute appendicitis]. Arch Esp Urol. 2005 Apr. 58(3):207-12. [Medline].
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg. 1999 Mar. 229(3):344-9. [Medline].
McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surg. 2005 Oct. 71(10):803-8. [Medline].
Harswick C, Uyenishi AA, Kordick MF, Chan SB. Clinical guidelines, computed tomography scan, and negative appendectomies: a case series. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Jan. 24(1):68-72. [Medline].
Frei SP, Bond WF, Bazuro RK, Richardson DM, Sierzega GM, Reed JF. Appendicitis outcomes with increasing computed tomographic scanning. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan. 26(1):39-44. [Medline].
Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 21. 154(12):789-96. [Medline].
Kepner AM, Bacasnot JV, Stahlman BA. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 May 23. [Medline].
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29. 357(22):2277-84. [Medline].
Zilbert NR, Stamell EF, Ezon I, Schlager A, Ginsburg HB, Nadler EP. Management and outcomes for children with acute appendicitis differ by hospital type: areas for improvement at public hospitals. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Jun. 48(5):499-504. [Medline].
Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Beyene J, Schuh S, et al. US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2006 Oct. 241(1):83-94. [Medline].
Boggs W. Ultrasound/MRI Strategy Diagnoses Appendicitis in Kids Without Radiation. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/821332. Accessed: March 12, 2014.
Aspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E, Kessler D, Keung C, Thirumoorthi A, et al. Ultrasonography/MRI Versus CT for Diagnosing Appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2014 Mar 3. [Medline].
Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J. MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Sep. 183(3):671-5. [Medline].
Repplinger MD, Levy JF, Peethumnongsin E, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI to diagnose appendicitis in the general population. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec 22. [Medline].
Thieme ME, Leeuwenburgh MM, Valdehueza ZD, Bouman DE, de Bruin IG, Schreurs WH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance of MRI in children with suspected appendicitis. Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct 19. [Medline].
Singer DD, Thode HC Jr, Singer AJ. Effects of pain severity and CT imaging on analgesia prescription in acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan. 34 (1):36-9. [Medline].
Eriksson S, Granström L. Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1995 Feb. 82(2):166-9. [Medline].
Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, et al. Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Jun 16. 313 (23):2340-8. [Medline].
Bonadio W, Rebillot K, Ukwuoma O, Saracino C, Iskhakov A. Management of pediatric perforated appendicitis: comparing outcomes using early appendectomy vs solely medical management. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Dec 14. [Medline].
Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M, Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar. 202(3):401-6. [Medline].
Abou-Nukta F, Bakhos C, Arroyo K, Koo Y, Martin J, Reinhold R, et al. Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours. Arch Surg. 2006 May. 141(5):504-6; discussion 506-7. [Medline].
Fair BA, Kubasiak JC, Janssen I, et al. The impact of operative timing on outcomes of appendicitis: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Project analysis. Am J Surg. 2015 Mar. 209 (3):498-502. [Medline].
Boomer LA, Cooper JN, Anandalwar S, et al. Delaying appendectomy does not lead to higher rates of surgical site infections: a multi-institutional analysis of children with appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2015 Dec 16. [Medline].
Wilasrusmee C, Sukrat B, McEvoy M, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy. Br J Surg. 2012 Nov. 99(11):1470-8. [Medline].
Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL. Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg. 2006 Feb. 72(2):162-6. [Medline].
Barclay L. Ultrasound, CT Comparable to Detect Appendicitis in Children. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/817370. Accessed: December 9, 2013.
Le J, Kurian J, Cohen HW, Weinberg G, Scheinfeld MH. Do clinical outcomes suffer during transition to an ultrasound-first paradigm for the evaluation of acute appendicitis in children?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Dec. 201(6):1348-52. [Medline].
Hurst AL, Olson D, Somme S, et al. Once-daily ceftriaxone plus metronidazole versus ertapenem and/or cefoxitin for pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2015 Dec 24. [Medline].
|M = Migration of pain to the RLQ||1|
|A = Anorexia||1|
|N = Nausea and vomiting||1|
|T = Tenderness in RLQ||2|
|R = Rebound pain||1|
|E = Elevated temperature||1|
|L = Leukocytosis||2|
|S = Shift of WBCs to the left||1|
|RLQ = right lower quadrant; WBCs = white blood cells|
|WBC (× 10,000)||Likelihood Ratio (95% CI)|
|Source: Dueholm et al.|
|CI = confidence interval; WBC = white blood cell.|