eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Genitourinary
Urinary Obstruction: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Jan 29, 2009
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
Differential Diagnoses
Other Problems to Be Considered
Prostatic carcinoma
Cervical carcinoma
Radiation exposure
Workup
Laboratory Studies
- As with any renal disease, initial workup should begin with a urinalysis and examination of sediment by an experienced examiner. Whenever an unremarkable urinalysis is observed in a patient with renal failure, obstruction should be considered. In a completely obstructed system, no distal urine flow occurs. A benign urinalysis may be seen with calculi or tumor.
- Microscopic hematuria can be found with a calculus or tumor.
- Pyuria should suggest the possibility of UTI.
- Crystalluria may be found in nephrolithiasis or intratubular crystal formation.
- Proteinuria and casts rarely are found in acute obstruction.
- Urinary diagnostic indices
- Urine sodium, creatinine, and osmolality often are difficult to interpret in the face of obstruction.
- Early in the course of obstruction, prior to severe renal impairment, prerenal indices commonly are observed where urine sodium is depressed, osmolality is elevated, and fractional excretion of sodium is less than 1%.
- With progressive obstruction and renal failure, indices consistent with acute tubular necrosis are observed, with elevated urine sodium, depressed osmolality, and fractional excretion of sodium greater than 1%.
- Serum electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, BUN, creatinine) as well as calcium, phosphate, magnesium, uric acid, and albumin should be measured.
- A hyperkalemic nonanion gap metabolic acidosis (type IV RTA) may be an important clue to urinary obstruction.
- Elevations of BUN and creatinine may be caused by renal failure secondary to obstruction.
- Complete blood count
- Elevated white blood cell (WBC) count may be consistent with UTI or hematologic malignancy.
- Polycythemia can be a complication of obstruction; anemia commonly is described in chronic renal failure.
Imaging Studies
- Goals of any imaging study are to distinguish anatomic etiologies from functional forms of collecting system dilation and to identify the site of blockage. Once the decision is made to use an imaging study, the patient's condition (eg, pregnancy and radiation risks, renal failure and radiocontrast risks) must be taken into consideration.
- Dilation of urinary tract - Obstruction versus functional
- Dilation without obstruction (functional) - Vesicoureteral reflux and one of the following:
- Chronic massive diuresis
- Extrarenal pelvis
- Calyceal diverticula
- Congenital megacalyces
- Ileal conduits
- Obstruction without dilation - Intermittent obstruction with one of the following:
- Partial obstructions
- Intrarenal crystals
- Nephrocalcinosis
- Staghorn calculi
- Retroperitoneal obstruction
- Dilation without obstruction (functional) - Vesicoureteral reflux and one of the following:
- CT scan
- Advantages: Compared with ultrasonography, CT scan is particularly adept at diagnosing obstruction at the ureteric level. A dilated urinary collecting system is well visualized even without the use of intravenous dye. CT scan can identify calcified and noncalcified calculi.
- Disadvantages: Ionizing radiation and the nephrotoxicity of radiocontrast dye are of particular importance in patients with chronic renal failure, diabetes mellitus, or multiple myeloma.
- Utility: Helical CT scan (especially without contrast) rapidly is replacing kidneys, ureter, bladder (KUB) x-rays as the first step in the radiologic evaluation of the urinary system.
- Although this technique is sensitive for diagnosing hydronephrosis, its real utility may be in delineating the anatomy of obstruction when ultrasonography and intravenous pyelography (IVP) fail to identify an etiology.
- CT scanning may replace invasive pyelography as the secondary procedure of choice to define the anatomy of obstruction after ultrasonography and IVP.
- MRI
- Advantages
- Sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96% for urinary obstruction
- No ionizing radiation
- Paramagnetic contrast agents - Allow renal functional assessment without risks of iodinated contrast materials
- Can identify calcified and noncalcified calculi
- Can differentiate acute from chronic obstruction by demonstrating perinephric fluid accumulation, which is correlated highly with acute obstruction
- Disadvantages: It can identify only obstruction with dilation and cannot differentiate functional dilation from anatomic obstruction.
- Utility: Where available, MRI quickly is becoming the imaging study of choice for urinary obstruction.
- Advantages
- Intravenous pyelography
- Advantages: IVP provides detailed morphology of the obstruction, and it is well accepted and easily accessible.
- Disadvantages: Nephrotoxicity of radiocontrast dye is of particular importance in patients with chronic renal failure, diabetes mellitus, or multiple myeloma. In patients with low GFR, excretion of the dye may take 12-24 hours after injection. Moreover, this technique cannot differentiate urinary dilation due to functional obstruction from that due to anatomic obstruction.
- Utility: IVP is the procedure of choice for defining the extent and anatomy of obstruction.
- Invasive pyelography
- Advantages: It provides the same information as IVP without dependence upon renal function and does not expose the patient to nephrotoxicity from intravenous dye.
- Disadvantages: It cannot differentiate urinary dilation from functional versus anatomical obstruction, and the invasive techniques have the added risk of infection.
- Utility: This technique can be used when the risks of IVP are considered too great; dye can be injected directly into the renal pelvis (antegrade) or cystoscopically into the ureters (retrograde).
- Ultrasonography
- Advantages: Sensitivity is higher than that of IVP; sensitivity for detecting hydronephrosis is 90%. Ultrasonography is particularly useful in identifying hydronephrosis in patients with low GFR. Patients are not exposed to ionizing radiation or intravenous dye (ie, no nephrotoxicity), and cost is low. Additionally, bladder wall thickness, bladder weight, and prostate size may aid in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction.
- Disadvantages: The study's effectiveness is operator dependent; false-positive rate is as high as 20%; ureters cannot be visualized. Reliability of bladder wall thickness index and variable anatomic sites needs to be confirmed in larger studies.
- Utility: Ultrasonography is the procedure of choice to determine the presence of hydronephrosis.
Other Tests
- Electrocardiogram (ECG) should be completed rapidly in these patients to identify the effects of hyperkalemia, a common complication of obstructive nephropathy.
- Postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume test can provide important information if bladder outlet obstruction is suspected.
- Perform test by placing a urinary catheter after a voiding attempt.
- Urologists often observe the voiding attempt, looking for signs of bladder outlet obstruction, as follows: hesitancy, stream strength, and need to double void.
- PVR urine volume greater than 125 mL is abnormally large and may indicate obstruction.
- Radionucleotide scan
- Advantages: Radionucleotide scan has high sensitivity (90% for detecting hydronephrosis) and involves no exposure to intravenous dye (ie, no nephrotoxicity).
- Disadvantage: It lacks the resolution of IVP to adequately define the exact site of anatomic obstruction.
- Utility
- Injection of a diuretic agent during the study helps in differentiation of functional and anatomic obstruction.
- Increased postdiuretic radionucleotide excretion points to a functional cause rather than an obstructive cause.
- Renal blood flow measurement by radionucleotide scan is becoming the technique of choice to assess the potential for renal recovery after relief of obstruction.
- Nonvisualization of the kidney does not conclusively rule out the potential for recovery after relief of obstruction.
- In pediatric patients with dilated urinary tract or suspected vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), perform voiding cystourethrography. Alternative imaging study methods include CT, MRI, and echo-enhanced cystosonography.
More on Urinary Obstruction |
| Overview: Urinary Obstruction |
 Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Urinary Obstruction |
| Treatment & Medication: Urinary Obstruction |
| Follow-up: Urinary Obstruction |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
de la Rosette JJ, Witjes WP, Schafer W, et al. Relationships between lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction: results from the ICS-"BPH" study. Neurourol Urodyn. 1998;17(2):99-108. [Medline].
Christensen J, Ostri P, Frimodt-Moller C, Juul C. Intravesical pressure changes during bladder drainage in patients with acute urinary retention. Urol Int. 1987;42(3):181-4. [Medline].
Gould F, Cheng CY, Lapides J. Comparison of rapid versus slow decompression of the distended urinary bladder. Investigative urology. Sep 1976;14 (2):156-8. [Medline].
Bartosh SM. Medical management of pediatric stone disease. Urol Clin North Am. Aug 2004;31(3):575-87, x-xi. [Medline].
Batlle DC, Arruda JA, Kurtzman NA. Hyperkalemic distal renal tubular acidosis associated with obstructive uropathy. N Engl J Med. Feb 12 1981;304(7):373-80. [Medline].
Becker A, Baum M. Obstructive uropathy. Early Hum Dev. Jan 2006;82(1):15-22. [Medline].
Belal M, Abrams P. Noninvasive methods of diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in men. Part 1: Nonurodynamic approach. J Urol. Jul 2006;176(1):22-8. [Medline].
Berrocal T, Lopez-Pereira P, Arjonilla A, Gutierrez J. Anomalies of the distal ureter, bladder, and urethra in children: embryologic, radiologic, and pathologic features. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 2002;22(5):1139-64. [Medline].
Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Ambos MA, et al. Computed tomography of ureteral obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 1982;138(6):1107-13. [Medline].
Catalano C, Pavone P, Laghi A, et al. MR pyelography and conventional MR imaging in urinary tract obstruction. Acta Radiol. Mar 1999;40(2):198-202. [Medline].
Chapple CR, Baert L, Thind P, et al. Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily: tolerability in older and younger patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (symptomatic BPH). The European Tamsulosin Study Group. Eur Urol. 1997;32(4):462-70. [Medline].
Chevalier RL. Pathogenesis of renal injury in obstructive uropathy. Curr Opin Pediatr. Apr 2006;18(2):153-60. [Medline].
Chu J. Genitourinary principles. In: Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed. 2006: 442-56.
Dal Canton A, Corradi A, Stanziale R, et al. Glomerular hemodynamics before and after release of 24-hour bilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int. Apr 1980;17(4):491-6. [Medline].
Dalgic A, Boyvat F, Karakayali H, et al. Urologic complications in 1523 renal transplantations: The Baskent University experience. Transplant Proc. Mar 2006;38(2):543-7. [Medline].
Decramer S, Wittke S, Mischak H, et al. Predicting the clinical outcome of congenital unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in newborn by urinary proteome analysis. Nat Med. Apr 2006;12(4):398-400. [Medline].
Djavan B, Marberger M. A meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):1-13. [Medline].
Feinfeld DA, Anthony VL. Renal principles. In: Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed. 2006: 427-42.
Gustilo-Ashby AM, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, et al. The incidence of ureteral obstruction and the value of intraoperative cystoscopy during vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2006;194(5):1478-85. [Medline].
Hoffman LM, Suki WN. Obstructive uropathy mimicking volume depletion. JAMA. Nov 1 1976;236(18):2096-7. [Medline].
Ilbeigi P, Lombardo S, Sadeghi-Nejad H. Unusual cause of obstructive uropathy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37 (3):505-6. [Medline].
Kessler TM, Gerber R, Burkhard FC, et al. Ultrasound assessment of detrusor thickness in men-can it predict bladder outlet obstruction and replace pressure flow study?. J Urol. Jun 2006;175(6):2170-3. [Medline].
Kilby MD, Daniels JP, Khan K. Congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: to shunt or not to shunt?. BJU Int. Jan 2006;97(1):6-8. [Medline].
Levin RM, Longhurst PA, Whitbeck C, Korstanje C. The effect of tamsulosin on the response of the rabbit bladder to partial outlet obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(1):89-94. [Medline].
Louca G, Liberopoulos K, Fidas A, et al. MR urography in the diagnosis of urinary tract obstruction. Eur Urol. Feb 1999;35(2):102-8. [Medline].
Matlaga BR, Assimos DG. Urologic manifestations of nonurologic disease urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am. Feb 2003;30(1):91-9. [Medline].
Misseri R, Rink RC, Meldrum DR, Meldrum KK. Inflammatory mediators and growth factors in obstructive renal injury. J Surg Res. Jun 15 2004;119(2):149-59. [Medline].
Moudouni SM, Tligui M, Doublet JD, et al. Laparoscopic excision of seminal vesicle cyst revealed by obstruction urinary symptoms. Int J Urol. Mar 2006;13(3):311-4. [Medline].
O'Reilly PH, Lawson RS, Shields RA, Testa HJ. Idiopathic hydronephrosis--the diuresis renogram: a new non-invasive method of assessing equivocal pelvioureteral junction obstruction. J Urol. Feb 1979;121(2):153-5. [Medline].
Powers TA, Grove RB, Bauriedel JK, et al. Detection of obstructive uropathy using 99mtechnetium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. J Urol. Nov 1980;124(5):588-92. [Medline].
Reynard JM. Does anticholinergic medication have a role for men with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia either alone or in combination with other agents?. Curr Opin Urol. Jan 2004;14(1):13-6. [Medline].
Rodriguez RA. Renal toxicology. In: Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2nd ed. 1997: 355-67.
Rose JG, Gillenwater JY. Pathophysiology of ureteral obstruction. Am J Physiol. Oct 1973;225(4):830-7. [Medline].
Rugo HS, Fischman ML. Occupational cancer. In: Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2nd ed. 1997: 235-70.
Rule AD, Lieber MM, Jacobsen SJ. Is benign prostatic hyperplasia a risk factor for chronic renal failure?. J Urol. Mar 2005;173(3):691-6. [Medline].
Tsai JD, Huang FY, Lin CC, et al. Intermittent hydronephrosis secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: clinical and imaging features. Pediatrics. Jan 2006;117(1):139-46. [Medline].
Wille-Gussenhoven MJ, de Bock GH, de Beer-Buijs MJ, et al. Prostate symptoms in general practice: seriousness and inconvenience. Scand J Prim Health Care. Mar 1997;15(1):39-42. [Medline].
Woderich R, Fowler CJ. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with progressive neurological disease. Curr Opin Urol. Jan 2006;16(1):30-6. [Medline].
Zeidel ML, Pirtskhalaishvili G. Urinary tract obstruction. In: Brenner & Rector's The Kidney. 7th ed. 2004.
Further Reading
Keywords
urinary obstruction, obstruction of the urinary tract, blocked urine flow, renal failure, kidney failure, renal dysfunction, kidney dysfunction, renal insufficiency, renal calculi, urinary tract infection, UTI, renal tubular acidosis, RTA, hyperkalemia, hypomagnesia, hypophosphatemia
