Leishmaniasis in Emergency Medicine Workup
- Author: Jennifer J Lee, MD; Chief Editor: Rick Kulkarni, MD more...
Laboratory Studies
- Cutaneous leishmaniasis
- Diagnosis usually is based on the appearance of the lesion.
- In more than 70% of cutaneous leishmaniasis cases, microscopy of the parasite in Giemsa stains or histological section can reveal the parasite and should be attempted first. Culture of the organisms is an option but is unreliable (approximately 40% sensitivity) because organisms are difficult to isolate from the lesion, especially as the lesion becomes older. The organism grows on Schneider Drosophila medium (positive results in 1 wk) and Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle (NNN) medium (media available from the CDC). Cultures can produce positive results in 1-3 weeks.
- The leishmaniasis skin test (Montenegro test) produces positive results 3 months after the appearance of lesions. The Montenegro test is performed by injecting killed promastigotes intradermally and examining the skin 48 hours later to see if a delayed-type hypersensitivity response has formed. A positive result is defined as induration of 5 mm or more. The two main drawbacks are that acute infections cannot be identified (in endemic regions, more than 70% of the population will test positive) since it remains positive for life and those who are immunosuppressed may not mount a response.
- Serologic tests such as isoenzyme or monoclonal antibody analysis are not well established. However, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is being used more frequently and is more accurate in determining new-onset leishmaniasis than serum tests.
- Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
- Diagnosis preferably is made by culture of the organism, but organisms are often scant.
- On biopsy, a nonspecific granulomatous reaction often is observed. Giemsa stain may show the organisms.
- Results from the leishmanin skin test are positive after 2-3 months of infection. No skin tests currently are approved for use in the United States.
- Serologic tests are available in some centers and, as in the cutaneous form, PCR is becoming more common as a method of diagnosing the disease.
- Because the organisms often are scarce, the diagnosis often is epidemiologic (travel to endemic area, clinical picture coupled with laboratory data).
- Visceral leishmaniasis
- Definitive diagnosis is made by observing the parasite (more specifically, amastigotes in tissue) on stained Giemsa smears or by observing the culture of bone marrow, splenic, hepatic, or lymph node aspirates. The most sensitive method is splenic puncture, although iatrogenic complications can be serious.
- Cultures are grown on NNN medium (media available from the CDC), a biphasic medium, or liquid media with fetal calf serum (eg, Schneider Drosophila medium). Culture grows for 1-3 weeks.
- Serologic testing is useful with the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), which is 80-100% sensitive in patients with visceral leishmaniasis who are not infected with HIV. IFAT may cross-react in patients who have leprosy, tuberculosis, malaria, schistosomiasis, Chagas disease, and African trypanosomiasis.
- An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is now available and can be combined with IFAT and/or Western blot to increase sensitivity and specificity. If PCR is available, it is highly sensitive (between 92% and 99%) and specific (100%).
- Obtain a complete blood count. Bone marrow infiltration may cause anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia with a relative monocytosis and lymphocytosis.
- Perform liver function tests (LFTs).
- Run a coagulation panel.
Other Tests
- Of note, very few of these diagnostic tests are available in developing countries, where most diagnoses are made clinically.
- Monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) or hybridization of tissue touch blots with labeled kinetoplast DNA probes are used for identification of different strains of Leishmania.
- An immunochromatographic strip test exists for rapid detection of antibodies to Leishmania antigen K39.
- New research is being performed using PCR to detect clinically occult visceral leishmaniasis.
Update: Cutaneous leishmaniasis in U.S. military personnel--Southwest/Central Asia, 2002-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Apr 2 2004;53(12):264-5. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Sundar S, Chakravarty J, Agarwal D, Rai M, Murray HW. Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B for visceral leishmaniasis in India. N Engl J Med. Feb 11 2010;362(6):504-12. [Medline].
Alrajhi AA, Ibrahim EA, De Vol EB, Khairat M, Faris RM, Maguire JH. Fluconazole for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major. N Engl J Med. Mar 21 2002;346(12):891-5. [Medline].
Berman J. Current treatment approaches to leishmaniasis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. Oct 2003;16(5):397-401. [Medline].
Berman JD. Human leishmaniasis: clinical, diagnostic, and chemotherapeutic developments in the last 10 years. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 1997;24(4):684-703. [Medline].
Braunwald E. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. Online Update: McGraw-Hill.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in U.S. military personnel--Southwest/Central Asia, 2002-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Oct 24 2003;52(42):1009-12. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The Yellow Book, Health Information for Travelers, CDC 2003-2004. 2004.
Committee on Infectious Disease, American Academy of Pediatrics. Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 24th ed. Red Book; 1997:321-323.
Davies CR, Kaye P, Croft SL, Sundar S. Leishmaniasis: new approaches to disease control. BMJ. Feb 15 2003;326(7385):377-82. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Foti G. [Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis]. Minerva Med. Aug 2001;92(4):245-9. [Medline].
Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz S. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
Guerin PJ, Olliaro P, Sundar S, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis: current status of control, diagnosis, and treatment, and a proposed research and development agenda. Lancet Infect Dis. Aug 2002;2(8):494-501. [Medline].
Kafetzis DA. An overview of paediatric leishmaniasis. J Postgrad Med. Jan-Mar 2003;49(1):31-8. [Medline].
Lee SA, Hasbun R. Therapy of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Int J Infect Dis. Jun 2003;7(2):86-93. [Medline].
Magill AJ. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the returning traveler. Infect Dis Clin North Am. Mar 2005;19(1):241-66, x-xi. [Medline].
Micromedex Healthcare Series. Thomson Healthcare, Inc [database online]. Vol 124. 2004.
Minodier P, Retornaz K, Horelt A, Garnier JM. Liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in immunocompetent patients. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. Apr 2003;17(2):183-8. [Medline].
Olliaro PL, Guerin PJ, Gerstl S, Haaskjold AA, Rottingen JA, Sundar S. Treatment options for visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review of clinical studies done in India, 1980-2004. Lancet Infect Dis. Dec 2005;5(12):763-74. [Medline].
Pagliano P, Carannante N, Rossi M, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis in pregnancy: a case series and a systematic review of the literature. J Antimicrob Chemother. Feb 2005;55(2):229-33. [Medline].
Paredes R, Munoz J, Diaz I, Domingo P, Gurgui M, Clotet B. Leishmaniasis in HIV infection. J Postgrad Med. Jan-Mar 2003;49(1):39-49. [Medline].
Rogers ME, Ilg T, Nikolaev AV, Ferguson MA, Bates PA. Transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis by sand flies is enhanced by regurgitation of fPPG. Nature. Jul 22 2004;430(6998):463-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Schwartz E, Hatz C, Blum J. New world cutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers. Lancet Infect Dis. Jun 2006;6(6):342-9. [Medline].
Sundar S, Jha TK, Thakur CP, et al. Oral miltefosine for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. N Engl J Med. Nov 28 2002;347(22):1739-46. [Medline].
Sundar S, Pai K, Kumar R, et al. Resistance to treatment in Kala-azar: speciation of isolates from northeast India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. Sep 2001;65(3):193-6. [Medline].
Sundar S, Rai M. Laboratory diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. Sep 2002;9(5):951-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Tatro DS, Borgsdorf LR, Lopez JR, et al. A To Z Drug Facts. In: Facts and Comparisons. 5th ed. April 2005.
Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA. Current Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2005. 44th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
World Health Organization (WHO). Weekly epidemiological record No. 44. Vol 77. 2002:365-372.

