Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Emergent Management of Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections

  • Author: Bianca Asan Borja, MD; Chief Editor: Michael Stuart Bronze, MD  more...
 
Updated: Dec 23, 2015
 

Overview

Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) are potentially life-threatening medical emergencies that encompass a devastating and rapidly spreading destruction of soft tissue with associated systemic toxicity.

NSTI is a rare diagnosis with a wide spectrum of presentations in the emergency department (ED). The most significant challenge associated with NSTI is establishing an early diagnosis. Skin may not be involved initially, which may delay treatment in a patient who may appear healthy. During the first stages, NSTIs may be confused with cellulitis or other superficial skin infections.

The infectious process can be located anywhere in the body, with a characteristic rapid progression of the infection site and hyperacute systemic deterioration of the patient.

The spread of the infection can lead to limb amputation, and the mortality risk has been estimated to be 15%-20%.[1, 2, 3, 4] The rapid clinical course is assumed to be related to microbial virulence, and many studies show that most cases are polymicrobial as opposed to monomicrobial with an organism such as group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus or Streptococcus pyogenes.[1]

The lack of universal terminology used to define NSTIs and similar infections makes nomenclature confusing. Definitive treatment remains early and aggressive surgical intervention, and delay often results in increased risks of morbidity and mortality.[4, 5]

Next

Pathophysiology

The etiology of necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) is not always obvious. Pathogens can gain entry with a small site of inoculation, blunt trauma, cutaneous infections, post-surgical complications, blunt trauma, hematogenous spread, burns, childbirth, or idiopathic causes.[6]

Individuals with multiple comorbidities are at an increased risk for NSTI. Among the risk factors include intravenous drug use, diabetes, steroid use, immunocompromise, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, liver disease, chronic renal failure, and alcohol use. Nonetheless, healthy people without these risk factors may also be susceptible.[7, 8]

NSTIs can be defined as life-threatening infections of any of the layers within the soft-tissue compartment that are associated with necrotizing changes. NSTIs can range from skin and subcutaneous necrosis to muscle and fascial involvement, but classification is less important than the general principles.[7, 9, 10]

NSTI is pathophysiologically characterized by effects of bacterial toxins and enzymes (eg, hyaluronidase) that enable horizontal extension through the fascial planes, leading to intravascular thromboses and ischemic necrosis with disturbance of the host’s humoral and cellular immune response.[11] The infection is usually polymicrobial. Typical pathogens include group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus, Staphylococcus aureus (including community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus [CA-MRSA]), Enterococcus, Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroides, and clostridia.

Some of the clinical manifestations of NSTI include rapidly evolving signs of systemic compromise and devastating infection with signs of tissue destruction, skin manifestations of blistering, and hemorrhage with crepitus.

Necrotizing fasciitis can be a misleading term used to describe an aggressive infection of subcutaneous tissue and the superficial fascia. Histologically, the necrosis of the fascia can manifest with or without polymorphonuclear infiltrates or bacteria. Surgical findings include presence of foul-smelling “dishwater” pus and gray, friable necrotic fascia that does not resist blunt dissection.[12] The infection primarily does not affect musculature, but the prolongations of the deep fascia reach the surroundings of the skeletal muscle; progression to intermuscular fascia involvement and myonecrosis are signs of late-stage disease and indicate a poor prognosis.[13, 14]

Fournier gangrene is a fulminant necrotizing fasciitis of the genitourinary tract. It is a well-defined urological emergency that rapidly progresses to the entire perineum and abdominal wall. A handful of studies have described several scoring systems for Fournier gangrene, such as Fournier’s Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI), surgical Apgar score (sAPGAR), and Uludag Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (UFGSI), to predict the likelihood of mortality.[15]

Myonecrosis is a rare, potentially lethal condition that refers to necrotic infection of the muscle. The terms gas gangrene and clostridial myonecrosis have been used to refer to necrosis of the muscle tissue caused by toxin-producing Clostridia. Other bacteria are also capable of producing gas, and nonclostridial organisms have been isolated in 60%-85% cases of NSTIs with subcutaneous gas, and the term gas gangrene has been used to describe any gas-forming soft-tissue infection.[16]

Spontaneous gangrenous myositis (also known as spontaneous streptococcal gangrenous myositis, group A streptococcal necrosis, or streptococcal myonecrosis) is very rare. It is characterized by rapidly progressing necrotizing S pyogenes infection of skeletal muscle, usually preceded by influenzalike symptoms. 

Previous
Next

Epidemiology and Microbiology

Epidemiology

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) monitors specific infections in the United States, including necrotizing fasciitis, with a special system called Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs), based on causal organism. Each year in the United States, approximately 650-850 cases of necrotizing fasciitis caused by group A Streptococcus are reported, although this figure is probably low because of underreporting.[17]

The incidence of necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) is approximately 500-1500 cases per year, with a recent increase thought to be related to increased microbial virulence and antibiotic resistance.[1]

Microbiology

NSTI can be classified based on microbial etiology. Type I infections are the most common and are polymicrobial.[1, 6] Type II NSTI is monomicrobial in etiology and is associated with streptococci, staphylococci, and clostridia. Staphylococcal NSTI is increasing in prevalence owing to more cases of MRSA infection and association with intravenous drug use, particularly the use of black tar heroin.

Classification of NSTIs based on microbiology is as follows:

  • Type I - Polymicrobial etiology (most common)
  • Type II - Monomicrobial etiology ( Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Clostridium); ; Staphylococcal NSTI is increasing in prevalence owing to more cases of MRSA infection and association with intravenous drug use, particularly the use of black tar heroin
  • Type III - V vulnificus (associated with seawater exposure, in individuals with underlying cirrhosis)

Differential Diagnoses

Cellulitis

Phlegmasia cerulea dolens

Compartment syndrome

Previous
Next

Presentation and Diagnosis

NSTIs describes necrosis that involves subcutaneous fat, fascia, or muscle. It can present with a wide variety of clinical findings, and objective confirmation becomes difficult during the early stages of the infection.[18]

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly progressive, highly destructive bacterial infection that can initiate as an apparently benign skin infection with an area of painful erythema and edema. Findings in more advanced necrotizing fasciitis include dusky skin and yellowish to red-black fluid-filled bullae that rapidly progresses to a demarcated area of necrosis resembling a third-degree burn, evolving to frank cutaneous gangrene with penetration along deep fascial planes and myonecrosis. Other manifestations include thrombophlebitis in the lower extremities, bacteremia, septic shock, and hypotension with rapid death.[19, 20]

Myonecrosis, which is characteristically associated with clostridial infection, may result in a bronze color, followed by hemorrhagic bullae, dermal gangrene, and, finally, crepitus. Nonclostridial infections are usually associated with erythema, pain, and swelling but are frequently initially identical to simple cellulitis. An apparent superficial cellulitis that fails to respond to standard antibiotic therapy and that progresses rapidly, resulting in systemic toxicity, should raise suspicion for necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI).

A seroma with partial or complete dehiscence of a recent operative incision are potentially suggestive of necrotizing infection. The patient should be returned to the operating room for tissue biopsy and thorough examination of all layers of the skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia, muscle, and peritoneum.

Chronic edema resulting in venous stasis or peripheral vascular disease, as well as preexisting diabetic foot wounds, are associated with NSTIs. NSTIs occur more commonly in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, chronic alcoholism, chronic renal disease, HIV disease, liver disease, and underlying malignancy.[21, 22]

In rare cases, necrotizing infections can occur in the retroperitoneum and have cutaneous manifestations on the abdominal wall as a complication of intra-abdominal infectious processes, perforated viscous, or severe pancreatitis complicated by abscess.[23, 24]

NSTIs can be difficult to diagnose early in the disease course, as initial signs and symptoms can be typical of cellulitis. As mentioned above, the classic examination finding of pain out of proportion to examination or pain extending beyond the border of infection are both concerning for NSTI. Hemorrhagic bullae, ecchymosis, and crepitus are later findings.

It is common for patients with NSTI to present with signs of systemic toxicity due to a systemic inflammatory response caused by cytokine release. However, some patients with underlying chronic illness may be relatively immunosuppressed and demonstrate a less-dramatic presentation.

Some patients present with “la belle indifference” and, despite a severely infected extremity, seem inappropriately unbothered, which may be a result of local ischemia causing the skin to become insensate.

One European study identified the presence of initial visible skin necrosis as an independent predictor of mortality.[25]

The most important discriminative information to be established in patients with soft-tissue infection is the presence of a necrotizing component. This will confirm NSTI and, by definition, identifies patients who require surgical debridement. The first and most important tool for early diagnosis of NSTI is a high index of suspicion. Unfortunately, true risk factors for NSTI have not been identified.[26]

See the images below.

Left upper extremity shows necrotizing fasciitis i Left upper extremity shows necrotizing fasciitis in an individual who used illicit drugs. Cultures grew Streptococcus milleri and anaerobes (Prevotella species). Patient would grease, or lick, the needle before injection.
Necrotizing fasciitis at a possible site of insuli Necrotizing fasciitis at a possible site of insulin injection in the left upper part of the thigh in a 50-year-old obese woman with diabetes.
Photomicrograph of Fournier gangrene (necrotizing Photomicrograph of Fournier gangrene (necrotizing fasciitis), oil immersion at 1000× magnification. Note the acute inflammatory cells in the necrotic tissue. Bacteria are located in the haziness of their cytoplasm. Courtesy of Billie Fife, MD, and Thomas A. Santora, MD.

When evaluating a patient for possible NSTI, the border of erythema should always be marked upon initial evaluation to assess for rapid advancement.

Radiographic studies can demonstrate subcutaneous emphysema, but this is late finding and should not be used to rule out NSTI; however, if present, it is associated with severe disease.[27]

Emergency ultrasonography can also be used to aid in the diagnosis by revealing similar findings of thickened or irregular fascia or fluid along the fascial planes.[28, 29] See the image below.

Ultrasound image demonstrating thickened, irregula Ultrasound image demonstrating thickened, irregular fascial plane with edema within underlying muscle representing myonecrosis in patient with confirmed necrotizing fasciitis.

MRI is superior to all other imaging modalities because of its remarkable soft-tissue capabilities. Intermuscular fluid collection and variable fascial thickening are useful findings; however, T2 hyperintensity in the deep muscular fascia is an important feature for diagnosis.[30] Nonetheless, MRI may be inappropriate for unstable patients or if it would delay surgical intervention.[1]

The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score can be used to increase suspicion for a necrotizing skin infection.[16] The LRINEC score includes 6 variables associated with NSTI and are used to calculate a score correlating to the risk of NSTI (see tables 1 and 2 below). Patients with an LRINEC score of 6 or higher are at highest risk for the presence of a necrotizing infection. However, an LRINEC score of 6 or less cannot be used to rule out the diagnosis completely. Patients still need a thorough evaluation to rule out the disease. Not included in the LRINEC score is a serum lactate level, which, if elevated, should also increase concern for NSTI. Patients with concern for NSTI can rapidly deteriorate and should be reevaluated frequently.

Table 1. LRINEC Score Parameters (Open Table in a new window)

Laboratory Parameter LRINEC Points
C-reactive protein (mg/L)  
< 150 0
≥ 150 4
Total white blood cell count (µ L)  
< 15 0
15-25 1
>25 2
Hemoglobin (g/dL)  
>13.6 0
11-13.5 1
< 10.9 2
Sodium (mmol/L)  
≥ 135 0
< 135 2
Creatinine (mg/dL)  
≤ 1.6 0
>1.6 2
Glucose (mg/dL)  
≤ 180 0
>180 1

 

Table 2. LRINEC Score and Risk of NSTI (Open Table in a new window)

Risk Category LRINEC Score, Points Probability of NSTI, %
Low < 5 < 50
Intermediate 6-7 50-70
High >8 >75
Previous
Next

Emergency Department Management

Early recognition of necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) is critical and requires a coordinated multidisciplinary approach. Patients with suspected necrotizing fasciitis must be promptly and aggressively treated to reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality.[31]

Obtain intravenous access in the unaffected extremity and begin fluid resuscitation with normal saline or lactated Ringer solution.

Administer adequate intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics, as the etiology can be polymicrobial.

Consider supplemental oxygen and intubation in patients with hypoxia or altered mental status.

Electrolyte replacement is initiated as needed.

Immediate surgical consultation is indicated when necrotizing soft-tissue skin infection (NSTI) is suspected. A surgeon should be promptly consulted for definitive management. Tetanus status should be assessed and updated, if indicated.

Antibiotic Selection

Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic therapy should be initiated upon suspicion for possible necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI). Antibiotic selection should cover gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic organisms. The current Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend broad-spectrum coverage (vancomycin or linezolid plus [1] piperacillin-tazobactam or a carbapenem or [2] ceftriaxone and metronidazole).[31]

Organism-specific management is as follows:[31]

  • Mixed infections: (1) Piperacillin-tazobactam 3.37 g IV every 6-8 h plus vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses, (2) imipenem-cilastin 1 g IV every 6-8 h IV, (3) meropenem 1 g IV every 8 h, (4) ertapenem 1 g IV daily, or (5) cefotaxime 2 g IV every 6 h plus metronidazole 500 mg IV every 6 h or clindamycin 600-900 mg IV every 8 h
  • Streptococcus and Clostridium species: Penicillin 2-4 million units IV every 4-6 h plus clindamycin 600-900 mg IV every 8 h
  • S aureus: Nafcillin 1-2 g IV every 4 h, oxacillin 1-2 g IV every 4 h, cefazolin 1 g IV every 8 h, vancomycin (resistant strains) 30 mg/kg/d IV in 2 divided doses, or clindamycin 600-900 mg IV every 8 h
  • V vulnificus: Doxycycline 100 mg IV every 12 h plus ceftriaxone 1 g IV qid, or cefotaxime 2 g IV qid
  • Aeromonas hydrophila: Doxycycline 100 mg IV every 12 h plus ciprofloxacin 500 mg IV every 12 h, or ceftriaxone 1-2 g IV every 24 h 
Previous
Next

Debridement and Definitive Surgical Management

Aggressive surgical debridement of all necrotic tissue is the definitive treatment of necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs). Although pus may be nearly absent, the wounds can discharge copious amount of tissue fluid. Antibiotic treatment alone without surgical intervention leads to progressive sepsis. Debridement is best accomplished by early and extensive incision of skin and subcutaneous tissue wide into healthy tissue, followed by excision of all necrotic fascia and nonviable skin and subcutaneous tissue.

Previous
Next

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) in necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) is controversial, as it has not been proven as a benefit for the patient and can delay resuscitation and surgical debridement. HBO involves the use of oxygen at 2-3 times atmospheric pressure with proposed benefits of bacteriocidal effects, improved polymorphonuclear lymphocyte function, and enhanced wound healing. There are few controlled clinical studies with conflicting results. HBO should be considered as a treatment adjunct and does not replace surgical debridement.[22, 32]

Previous
Next

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is an experimental treatment for necrotizing fasciitis and is postulated to bind exotoxin produced by streptococcal and staphylococcal species, potentially delaying the onset of the systemic inflammatory response and sepsis. The use of IVIG has not been definitively established, but it can be considered on a case-by-case basis in hemodynamic unstable, critically ill patients. However, controlled trials are lacking.[33]

Previous
Next

Consultations and Transfer

Obtain early surgical consultation for aggressive debridement in cases of suspected necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) without delay for results of laboratory or radiology studies. Consider surgical subspecialty consultation for necrotizing fasciitis involving specific anatomic areas such as urology in cases of Fournier gangrene. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist may help guide initial empiric antibiotic therapy. If the current facility is not capable of handling the aggressive care, monitoring, and serial surgical debridement that these patients require, arrangements for transfer should be made. However, patients should not be considered for transfer until they remain hemodynamically stable. 

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Bianca Asan Borja, MD Resident Physician, Section of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine

Bianca Asan Borja, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, Emergency Medicine Residents' Association, Texas College of Emergency Physicians, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

M Tyson Pillow, MD, MEd Associate Residency Director, Section of Emergency Medicine, Ben Taub General Hospital; Assistant Professor, Director of Simulation Program, Office of Undergraduate Medical Education, Baylor College of Medicine

M Tyson Pillow, MD, MEd is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, American Medical Student Association/Foundation, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Residents' Association, Air Medical Physician Association, Student National Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Eric L Weiss, MD, DTM&H Medical Director, Office of Service Continuity and Disaster Planning, Fellowship Director, Stanford University Medical Center Disaster Medicine Fellowship, Chairman, SUMC and LPCH Bioterrorism and Emergency Preparedness Task Force, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Surgery (Emergency Medicine), Stanford University Medical Center

Eric L Weiss, MD, DTM&H is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Southern Oncology Association of Practices, Southern Clinical Neurological Society, Wilderness Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD David Ross Boyd Professor and Chairman, Department of Medicine, Stewart G Wolf Endowed Chair in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center; Master of the American College of Physicians; Fellow, Infectious Diseases Society of America

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Medical Association, Oklahoma State Medical Association, Southern Society for Clinical Investigation, Association of Professors of Medicine, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Eric M Kardon, MD, FACEP Attending Emergency Physician, Georgia Emergency Medicine Specialists; Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Athens Regional Medical Center

Eric M Kardon, MD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Medical Association of Georgia

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Lindsay L Fowler, MD Chief Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, Ben Taub General Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine

Lindsay L Fowler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Texas Medical Association, Emergency Medicine Residents' Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Sarani B, Strong M, Pascual J, Schwab CW. Necrotizing fasciitis: current concepts and review of the literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb. 208(2):279-88. [Medline].

  2. Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1. 44(5):705-10. [Medline].

  3. Anaya DA, McMahon K, Nathens AB, Sullivan SR, Foy H, Bulger E. Predictors of mortality and limb loss in necrotizing soft tissue infections. Arch Surg. 2005 Feb. 140(2):151-7; discussion 158. [Medline].

  4. Kobayashi L, Konstantinidis A, Shackelford S, Chan LS, Talving P, Inaba K. Necrotizing soft tissue infections: delayed surgical treatment is associated with increased number of surgical debridements and morbidity. J Trauma. 2011 Nov. 71(5):1400-5. [Medline].

  5. Boyer A, Vargas F, Coste F, Saubusse E, Castaing Y, Gbikpi-Benissan G. Influence of surgical treatment timing on mortality from necrotizing soft tissue infections requiring intensive care management. Intensive Care Med. 2009 May. 35(5):847-53. [Medline].

  6. Bosshardt TL, Henderson VJ, Organ CH. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. Holzheimer RG, Mannick JA, eds. Surgical Treatment: Evidence-Based and Problem-Oriented. Munich: Zuckschwerdt; 2001.

  7. Phan HH, Cocanour CS. Necrotizing soft tissue infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep. 38 (9 Suppl):S460-8. [Medline].

  8. Marx J, Hockberger R, Walls R. Rosen's Emergency Medicine - Concepts and Clinical Practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2014.

  9. de Prost N, Sbidian E, Chosidow O, Brun-Buisson C, Amathieu R, Henri Mondor Hospital Necrotizing Fasciitis Group. Management of necrotizing soft tissue infections in the intensive care unit: results of an international survey. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Aug. 41 (8):1506-8. [Medline].

  10. McHenry CR, Piotrowski JJ, Petrinic D, Malangoni MA. Determinants of mortality for necrotizing soft-tissue infections. Ann Surg. 1995 May. 221 (5):558-63; discussion 563-5. [Medline].

  11. Sunderkötter C, Becker K. Frequent bacterial skin and soft tissue infections: diagnostic signs and treatment. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015 Jun. 13 (6):501-24; quiz 525-6. [Medline].

  12. Bakleh M, Wold LE, Mandrekar JN, Harmsen WS, Dimashkieh HH, Baddour LM. Correlation of histopathologic findings with clinical outcome in necrotizing fasciitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 1. 40 (3):410-4. [Medline].

  13. Paz Maya S, Dualde Beltrán D, Lemercier P, Leiva-Salinas C. Necrotizing fasciitis: an urgent diagnosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2014 May. 43 (5):577-89. [Medline].

  14. Tilkorn DJ, Citak M, Fehmer T, Ring A, Hauser J, Al Benna S, et al. Characteristics and differences in necrotizing fasciitis and gas forming myonecrosis: a series of 36 patients. Scand J Surg. 2012. 101 (1):51-5. [Medline].

  15. Lin TY, Ou CH, Tzai TS, Tong YC, Chang CC, Cheng HL, et al. Validation and simplification of Fournier's gangrene severity index. Int J Urol. 2014 Jul. 21 (7):696-701. [Medline].

  16. Brucato MP, Patel K, Mgbako O. Diagnosis of gas gangrene: does a discrepancy exist between the published data and practice. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr. 53 (2):137-40. [Medline].

  17. Woodburn KR, Ramsay G, Gillespie G, Miller DF. Retroperitoneal necrotizing fasciitis. Br J Surg. 1992 Apr. 79 (4):342-4. [Medline].

  18. [Guideline] Frazee BW, Fee C, Lynn J, Wang R, Bostrom A, Hargis C, et al. Community-acquired necrotizing soft tissue infections: a review of 122 cases presenting to a single emergency department over 12 years. J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb. 34 (2):139-46. [Medline].

  19. Brook I. Microbiology and management of soft tissue and muscle infections. Int J Surg. 2008 Aug. 6 (4):328-38. [Medline].

  20. Olsen RJ, Musser JM. Molecular pathogenesis of necrotizing fasciitis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010. 5:1-31. [Medline].

  21. Wong CH, Chang HC, Pasupathy S, Khin LW, Tan JL, Low CO. Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug. 85-A (8):1454-60. [Medline].

  22. Hsiao CT, Weng HH, Yuan YD, Chen CT, Chen IC. Predictors of mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb. 26 (2):170-5. [Medline].

  23. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8. 345 (19):1368-77. [Medline].

  24. Amitai A, Sinert R. Necrotizing fasciitis as the clinical presentation of a retroperitoneal abscess. J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan. 34 (1):37-40. [Medline].

  25. Krieg A, Dizdar L, Verde PE, Knoefel WT. Predictors of mortality for necrotizing soft-tissue infections: a retrospective analysis of 64 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Mar. 399 (3):333-41. [Medline].

  26. Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1. 44 (5):705-10. [Medline].

  27. Lille ST, Sato TT, Engrav LH, Foy H, Jurkovich GJ. Necrotizing soft tissue infections: obstacles in diagnosis. J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jan. 182 (1):7-11. [Medline].

  28. Yen ZS, Wang HP, Ma HM, Chen SC, Chen WJ. Ultrasonographic screening of clinically-suspected necrotizing fasciitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Dec. 9 (12):1448-51. [Medline].

  29. Oelze L, Wu S, Carnell J. Emergency ultrasonography for the early diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis: a case series from the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Mar. 31 (3):632.e5-7. [Medline].

  30. Ali SZ, Srinivasan S, Peh WC. MRI in necrotizing fasciitis of the extremities. Br J Radiol. 2014 Jan. 87 (1033):20130560. [Medline].

  31. [Guideline] Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15. 59 (2):e10-52. [Medline].

  32. George ME, Rueth NM, Skarda DE, Chipman JG, Quickel RR, Beilman GJ. Hyperbaric oxygen does not improve outcome in patient with necrotizing fasciitis. Surgical Infections. 2009. 10; 1:

  33. Koch C, Hecker A, Grau V, Padberg W, Wolff M, Henrich M. Intravenous immunoglobulin in necrotizing fasciitis - A case report and review of recent literature. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Sep. 4 (3):260-3. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Left upper extremity shows necrotizing fasciitis in an individual who used illicit drugs. Cultures grew Streptococcus milleri and anaerobes (Prevotella species). Patient would grease, or lick, the needle before injection.
Necrotizing fasciitis at a possible site of insulin injection in the left upper part of the thigh in a 50-year-old obese woman with diabetes.
Photomicrograph of Fournier gangrene (necrotizing fasciitis), oil immersion at 1000× magnification. Note the acute inflammatory cells in the necrotic tissue. Bacteria are located in the haziness of their cytoplasm. Courtesy of Billie Fife, MD, and Thomas A. Santora, MD.
Ultrasound image demonstrating thickened, irregular fascial plane with edema within underlying muscle representing myonecrosis in patient with confirmed necrotizing fasciitis.
Table 1. LRINEC Score Parameters
Laboratory Parameter LRINEC Points
C-reactive protein (mg/L)  
< 150 0
≥ 150 4
Total white blood cell count (µ L)  
< 15 0
15-25 1
>25 2
Hemoglobin (g/dL)  
>13.6 0
11-13.5 1
< 10.9 2
Sodium (mmol/L)  
≥ 135 0
< 135 2
Creatinine (mg/dL)  
≤ 1.6 0
>1.6 2
Glucose (mg/dL)  
≤ 180 0
>180 1
Table 2. LRINEC Score and Risk of NSTI
Risk Category LRINEC Score, Points Probability of NSTI, %
Low < 5 < 50
Intermediate 6-7 50-70
High >8 >75
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.