eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Infectious Diseases
Shock, Septic: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Aug 12, 2009
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
Differential Diagnoses
Workup
Laboratory Studies
Laboratory studies for suspected cases of sepsis and/or septic shock may include the following:
- CBC with differential
- The WBC count and the white cell differential can be somewhat helpful in predicting bacterial infection, albeit an elevated WBC count is not specific to infection.
- In the setting of fever without localizing signs of infection, a WBC count greater than 15,000/mm3 or a neutrophil band count greater than 1500/mm3 has about a 50% correlation with bacterial infection.
- The WBC count is also a component of the SIRS criteria, with WBC >12 or WBC <4 or bands >10% being positive.
- Hemoglobin concentration dictates oxygen-carrying capacity in blood, which is crucial in sepsis to maintain adequate tissue perfusion. The goal is to maintain hematocrit greater than 30% and hemoglobin greater than 10 g/dL.
- Platelets are an acute-phase reactant and are typically elevated in the setting of inflammation. However, platelet counts may decrease in the setting of DIC.
- Comprehensive chemistry panel
- Sodium and chloride levels are abnormal in severe dehydration.
- Decreased bicarbonate can point to acute acidosis.
- Increased blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels can point to severe dehydration or renal failure.
- Glucose control is important in the management of sepsis, with hyperglycemia associated with higher mortality.
- Liver function tests (LFTs) and bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and lipase levels are important in evaluating for multiorgan failure or a potential source of sepsis (eg, biliary disease, pancreatitis, hepatitis).
- Serum lactate is a marker of anaerobic metabolism, which occurs when tissue oxygen demand exceeds supply. This can result from decreased arterial oxygen content (hypoxemia), decreased perfusion pressure (hypotension), maldistribution of flow, and decreased diffusion of oxygen across capillary membranes to target tissues, and decreased oxygen utilization on a cellular level. Lactate levels greater than 2.5 mmol/L are associated with an increase in mortality.Levels greater than 4 mmol/L in patients with suspected infection have been shown to increase mortality odds 5-fold and are associated with a mortality rate approaching 30%.14 It has been hypothesized that lactate clearance can be a helpful measure of tissue reperfusion and an indication of adequate therapy.
- Coagulation studies (PT/aPTT)
- Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are elevated in DIC.
- Fibrinogen levels are decreased and fibrin split products are increased in the setting of DIC.
- Blood cultures
- Blood cultures should be obtained in patients who have suspected sepsis in order to isolate a specific organism to tailor antibiotic therapy. Note, however, that blood cultures are positive in fewer than 50% of cases of sepsis.
- A set of cultures from an indwelling intravenous catheter is especially important, as these catheters are a frequent source of bacteremia.
- Urinalysis and urine culture
- Urinary tract infection is a common source of sepsis, especially in elderly patients. Febrile adults without localizing symptoms or signs have a rate of occult urinary tract infection of 10-15%.
- Again, obtaining a culture is important in order to isolate a specified organism and to tailor antibiotic therapy.
- Gram stain and culture, when applicable
- Sputum specimen should be obtained if pneumonia is suspected.
- Any abscess should be drained promptly, and purulent material sent to the microbiology laboratory for analysis.
- CSF specimen should be obtained if meningitis is suspected.
Imaging Studies
Imaging should be performed as deemed appropriate to search for a source of infection.
- Chest radiography
- Infiltrates are detected with a chest radiograph in about 5% of febrile adults without localizing signs of infection; therefore, a chest radiography should be routine in the workup of fever with an unclear etiology.
- Chest radiography is useful in detecting radiographic evidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which carries a high mortality rate. Evidence of ARDS on a chest radiograph should prompt early intubation and mechanical ventilation, even if the patient has not yet shown signs of overt respiratory distress.
- Abdominal plain films should be obtained if clinical evidence of bowel obstruction or perforation exists.
- Abdominal ultrasonography is indicated when evidence of acute cholecystitis or ascending cholangitis exists (eg, right upper quadrant abdominal tenderness; fever; vomiting; elevated LFTs, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase levels). Surgery or ERCP may be urgently necessary in the setting of sepsis with acute cholecystitis or ascending cholangitis.
- Abdominal CT scan should be obtained if the patient has abdominal or flank tenderness in the setting of sepsis. Certain abdominal processes may require urgent operative intervention (eg, diverticular abscess, ischemic bowel, appendicitis, perinephric abscess).
- Plain radiographs of the extremities may be helpful when deep soft-tissue infection is suspected.
- These films can show evidence of soft-tissue gas formation; however, necrotizing fasciitis is a clinical diagnosis (eg, extreme pain, crepitus, bullae, hemorrhage, foul-smelling exudates). If clinical suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis is high, a surgical consultation should be obtained immediately as such a patient should be taken promptly to the operating room for interventionoften without the need for any imaging. CT or MRI can show evidence of subcutaneous and deep tissue inflammation; however, neither modality is sensitive or specific in the setting of necrotizing deep tissue infection and should not be relied upon to make the diagnosis.
- Plain radiographs can also show evidence of osteomyelitis, although MRI is much more sensitive for making this diagnosis.
Procedures
- Orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation
- Intubation should be considered early in the course of sepsis in order to optimize ventilation and oxygenation, even in the absence of frank hypoxia or respiratory distress.
- Delivering oxygen at an FiO2 of 1 directly to the trachea is far superior to delivery via a nonrebreather oxygen mask. Mechanical ventilation, with appropriate sedation and paralysis, also eliminates the work of breathing and decreases the metabolic demands of breathing, which accounts for about 30% of the total metabolic demand at baseline.
- Intravenous access
- Two large-bore (16-gauge) intravenous lines should be placed if possible when sepsis is suspected in order to administer aggressive fluid resuscitation and broad-spectrum antibiotics.
- A central venous (CV) catheter should be placed in the internal jugular or subclavian vein in patients with septic shock if hypotension is refractory to a crystalloid fluid bolus of 20-30 mL/kg (1-2 L) over 30-60 minutes or if fluids cannot be infused rapidly enough. A CV catheter allows for administration of medication centrally, and it provides multiple ports for rapid fluid administration, antibiotics, and vasopressors if needed. It also allows for the measurement of central venous pressure (CVP), a surrogate for volume status, if CVP measurement capability is available.
- Urinary catheter (Foley catheter)
- A urinary catheter should be placed in order to follow urinary output, a rough indicator of intravascular fluid status and tissue perfusion pressure.
- Normal urinary output in an adult is about 0.5 mL/kg/h or about 30-50 mL/h for most adults.
- Cutaneous or soft-tissue abscess drainage
- A soft-tissue abscess should be drained promptly in the setting of sepsis because the patient's condition will not improve until the inciting bacterial load is removed.
- A superficial abscess can be drained in the ED; however, any deep abscess or suspected necrotizing fasciitis should be treated in the operating room for drainage.
- A thorough search for abscesses should be performed in cases of sepsis of unclear etiology, with particular attention paid to the rectal and perianal area.
- A lumbar puncture should be performed if clinical evidence or suspicion for meningitis or encephalitis exists.
- Broad-spectrum antibiotics to cover meningitis should be administered before starting the procedure.
- If evidence of increased intracranial pressure (papilledema) or focal mass lesions (focal defects, preceding sinusitis or otitis) exists, antibiotics should be started and a head CT scan should be obtained. CSF cultures will not be affected by the administration of antibiotics for at least several hours; therefore, proper antibiotic administration should not be delayed by the procedure if there is a high suspicion of meningitis.
More on Shock, Septic |
| Overview: Shock, Septic |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Shock, Septic |
| Treatment & Medication: Shock, Septic |
| Follow-up: Shock, Septic |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
ACCP. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. Jun 1992;20(6):864-74. [Medline].
Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis. JAMA. Sep 27 1995;274(12):968-74. [Medline].
Sands KE, Bates DW, Lanken PN, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis syndrome in 8 academic medical centers. JAMA. Jul 16 1997;278(3):234-40. [Medline].
Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. Jun 2006;34(6):1589-96. [Medline].
Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. Mar 8 2001;344(10):699-709. [Medline].
Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Abrahamian FM, et al. Severe sepsis and septic shock: review of the literature and emergency department management guidelines. Ann Emerg Med. Jul 2006;48(1):28-54. [Medline].
Wheeler AP, Bernard GR. Treating patients with severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. Jan 21 1999;340(3):207-14. [Medline].
Trzeciak S, Rivers EP. Clinical manifestations of disordered microcirculatory perfusion in severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2005;9 Suppl 4:S20-6. [Medline].
Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. Apr 17 2003;348(16):1546-54. [Medline].
Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. Jul 2001;29(7):1303-10. [Medline].
Wang HE, Shapiro NI, Angus DC, et al. National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments. Crit Care Med. Aug 2007;35(8):1928-36. [Medline].
Shapiro N, Howell MD, Bates DW, et al. The association of sepsis syndrome and organ dysfunction with mortality in emergency department patients with suspected infection. Ann Emerg Med. Nov 2006;48(5):583-90, 590.e1. [Medline].
Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, et al. The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective study. JAMA. Jan 11 1995;273(2):117-23. [Medline].
Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, et al. Serum lactate as a predictor of mortality in emergency department patients with infection. Ann Emerg Med. May 2005;45(5):524-8. [Medline].
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. Nov 8 2001;345(19):1368-77. [Medline].
Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P, et al. A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. Oct 19 1995;333(16):1025-32. [Medline].
Rady MY, Rivers EP, Nowak RM. Resuscitation of the critically ill in the ED: responses of blood pressure, heart rate, shock index, central venous oxygen saturation, and lactate. Am J Emerg Med. Mar 1996;14(2):218-25. [Medline].
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. Jan 2008;36(1):296-327. [Medline].
Kortgen A, Niederprum P, Bauer M. Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock. Crit Care Med. Apr 2006;34(4):943-9. [Medline].
Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, et al. Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol. Crit Care Med. Apr 2006;34(4):1025-32. [Medline].
Nguyen HB, Corbett SW, Steele R, et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Crit Care Med. Apr 2007;35(4):1105-12. [Medline].
Vincent JL, Gerlach H. Fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. Nov 2004;32(11 Suppl):S451-4. [Medline].
Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. May 27 2004;350(22):2247-56. [Medline].
Bochud PY, Bonten M, Marchetti O, et al. Antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. Nov 2004;32(11 Suppl):S495-512. [Medline].
Beale RJ, Hollenberg SM, Vincent JL, et al. Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. Nov 2004;32(11 Suppl):S455-65. [Medline].
Russell JA. Vasopressin in septic shock. Crit Care Med. Sep 2007;35(9 Suppl):S609-15. [Medline].
Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, et al. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. Feb 28 2008;358(9):877-87. [Medline].
Cooper MS, Stewart PM. Corticosteroid insufficiency in acutely ill patients. N Engl J Med. Feb 20 2003;348(8):727-34. [Medline].
Cronin L, Cook DJ, Carlet J, et al. Corticosteroid treatment for sepsis: a critical appraisal and meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. Aug 1995;23(8):1430-9. [Medline].
Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, et al. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA. Aug 21 2002;288(7):862-71. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Sprung CL, Annane D, Keh D, et al. Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. Jan 10 2008;358(2):111-24. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, Briegel J, Confalonieri M, De Gaudio R, et al. Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a systematic review. JAMA. Jun 10 2009;301(22):2362-75. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Cruz DN, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, Foltran F, Brienza N, Donati A, et al. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. Jun 17 2009;301(23):2445-52. [Medline].
Sevransky JE, Levy MM, Marini JJ. Mechanical ventilation in sepsis-induced acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. Nov 2004;32(11 Suppl):S548-53. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
septic shock, sepsis syndromes, bacteremia, sepsis, sepsis treatment, sepsis symptoms, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, SIRS, sepsis with hypotension, septic infection, gram-negative bacteremia, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, adult respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS, liver failure, acute renal failure, ARF, disseminated intravascular coagulation, DIC, sepsis syndrome, hypovolemic shock, cardiogenic shock, distributive shock, obstructive shock
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Shock, Septic