eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Neurology

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Steven J Parrillo, DO, FACOEP, FACEP, Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine, Jefferson Medical College and Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine; Medical Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Elkins Park; Chair, Emergency Management Committee, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network; Medical Director, Disaster Medicine and Management Masters Program, Philadelphia University

Updated: Oct 26, 2009

Introduction

Background

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSDS) has been recognized since the Civil War when it was called causalgia, a name chosen to describe intense, burning extremity pain after an injury. Since then, RSDS has had a number of name changes. Bonica coined the term reflex sympathetic dystrophy in 1953. The American Association of Hand Surgery proposed changing the name to sympathetic maintained pain syndrome. A consensus expert panel recommended a change to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, although many clinicians still use the term RSDS, the terms currently in favor are complex regional pain syndrome I (the equivalent of RSD) and complex regional pain syndrome II, also known as causalgia.

CRPS/RSDS has readily identifiable signs and symptoms and is treatable if recognized early; however, the syndrome may become disabling if unrecognized. Emergency physicians are frequently in a position to identify the problem and may play a significant role in minimizing impact of this common entity.

Pathophysiology

No single hypothesis explains all features of reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSDS). Schwartzman stated that a common mechanism may be injury to central or peripheral neural tissue.1 Roberts proposed that sympathetic pain results from tonic activity in myelinated mechanoreceptor afferents. Input causes tonic firing in neurons that are part of a nociceptive pathway. Campbell et al propose a hypothesis that places the primary abnormality in the peripheral nervous system.2

Most agree that complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neurologic disorder affecting central and peripheral nervous systems.3

Other etiologic possibilities have been suggested. German research has noted the association between elevated levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-R1) and enhanced tumor necrosis factor-alpha activity in patients with polyneuropathy with allodynia.4 Other German researchers have described autoantibodies in patients with CRPS, especially CRPS type 2.5

Harvard researchers Oaklander and Fields have proposed that distal degeneration of small-diameter peripheral axons may be responsible for the pain, vasomotor instability, edema, osteopenia, and skin hypersensitivity of CRPS-1.6

The recent association between the use of ACE inhibitors and CRPS have caused some to consider a neuroinflammatory pathogenesis.7

All agree that, regardless of the mechanism, the patient experiences intense, burning pain in one or more extremities.

Frequency

United States

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSDS) occurs in approximately 1-15% of peripheral nerve injury cases. Schwartzman states that complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) usually occurs secondary to fractures, sprains, and trivial soft tissue injury.1 The incidence after fractures and contusions ranges from 10-30%. While some cases are associated with an identifiable nerve injury, many are not. Even "microtrauma" as might occur with an immunization may be responsible. The upper extremities are more likely to be involved than the lower. Entities that have led to RSDS include the following:

  • Head injury
  • Stroke
  • Polio
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Polymyalgia rheumatica
  • Operative procedures (eg, carpal tunnel release)
  • Brachial plexopathy
  • Cast/splint immobilization
  • Minor extremity injury
  • Prolonged bedrest

Mortality/Morbidity

In and of itself, the disease is not fatal. Morbidity of RSDS is associated with disease progress through a series of stages (see Physical).

Schwartzman et al recently reviewed questionnaires from 656 patients with CRPS. Once patients had experienced symptoms for more than one year, the majority of signs and symptoms were developed. No one reported spontaneous remission of symptoms.8

Race

The 2009 questionnaire review by Schwartzman et al showed that, in the population he studied, the overwhelming majority (96%) were white and 80% were female.8

Sex

Stanton-Hicks and others note that women predominate in a range of 60-80% of cases.9

Age

Persons of all ages are affected; however, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is treated most effectively in pediatric patients.10

An Israeli group suggested that CRPS in children and adolescents is underdiagnosed. They emphasize the importance of early recognition and multidisciplinary treatment.11

Clinical

History

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) lists the diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I) (RSDS) as follows:12

  1. The presence of an initiating noxious event or a cause of immobilization
  2. Continuing pain, allodynia (perception of pain from a nonpainful stimulus), or hyperalgesia disproportionate to the inciting event
  3. Evidence at some time of edema, changes in skin blood flow, or abnormal sudomotor activity in the area of pain
  4. The diagnosis is excluded by the existence of any condition that would otherwise account for the degree of pain and dysfunction.

According to the IASP, CRPS II (also known as causalgia) is diagnosed as follows:

  1. The presence of continuing pain, allodynia, or hyperalgesia after a nerve injury, not necessarily limited to the distribution of the injured nerve
  2. Evidence at some time of edema, changes in skin blood flow, or abnormal sudomotor activity in the region of pain
  3. The diagnosis is excluded by the existence of any condition that would otherwise account for the degree of pain and dysfunction.

Note that the primary difference between type I and type II is the identification of a definable nerve injury.

Older literature records cardinal and secondary signs.13 They are worth noting not because they are in common use as primary and secondary but rather because they expand on the constellation of signs and symptoms the ED physician may see in patients.
  • Cardinal signs include pain, edema, stiffness, and discoloration. 
    • Pain that is intense and burning, out of proportion to the injury, and affects the entire extremity occurs with RSDS.
      • Hyperpathia refers to pain that persists after the stimulus has been removed.
      • Allodynia refers to pain with light touch.
      • Movement frequently aggravates pain.
      • Patients describe exacerbations with cold. Many patients feel worse when a low-pressure weather front is arriving. Airplane ascent and descent can be painful.
    • Edema is usually one of the earliest findings.
    • Stiffness may occur.
    • Discoloration may vary from intensely erythematous to cyanotic, pale, purple, or gray.
  • Lankford's secondary characteristics include the following:13
    • Demineralization and osteoporosis are among the most classic (late) findings.
    • Sudomotor changes vary from hyperhidrosis to dryness.
    • Temperature difference between affected and unaffected extremities may be marked but is usually measurable at some point in time.
    • Vasomotor instability most commonly is manifested as decreased capillary refill.
    • Erythema may be a sign of increased capillary refill and should be compared with refill in unaffected extremity.
    • Skin may develop a glossy shiny appearance. In late stages, trophic changes may involve a decrease in subcutaneous tissue.
    • In RSDS of the hand, nodules and thickening of the palmar fascia may develop.
  • Much of the RSDS literature notes a predisposing personality of depression. However, many other studies have demonstrated that, while most patients are depressed, they are depressed because of their pain. (See Causes below).
  • Many patients with CRPS/RSDS will exhibit some type of movement disorder ranging from strength reduction (78%) to tremor (25-60%) to myoclonus and dystonia. Although some authors believe these are pain-induced findings, others believe they are primary abnormalities.14

Physical

Three stages have been classified. Although a consensus panel recommended that staging be eliminated, it is important for the emergency physician to have awareness of potential disease progress. Disease progress is very variable.

  • Stage I or early RSDS: Pain is more severe than would be expected from the injury, and it has a burning or aching quality. It may be increased by dependency of the limb, physical contact, or emotional upset. The affected area becomes edematous, may be hyperthermic or hypothermic, and shows increased nail and hair growth. Radiographs may show early bony changes. Duration is usually 3 months from onset of symptoms. Some patients remain in one stage or another for many months or even years. They may never progress or they may progress quickly to late stage. Remember that physical findings may be minimal, especially in those who remain in stage I or progress slowly.
  • Stage II or established RSDS: Edematous tissue becomes indurated. Skin becomes cool and hyperhidrotic with livedo reticularis or cyanosis. Hair may be lost, and nails become ridged, cracked, and brittle. Hand dryness becomes prominent, and atrophy of skin and subcutaneous tissues becomes noticeable. Pain remains the dominant feature. It usually is constant and is increased by any stimulus to the affected area. Stiffness develops at this stage. Radiographs may show diffuse osteoporosis. The 3-phase bone scan is usually positive. Duration is 3-12 months from onset.
  • Stage III or late RSDS: Pain spreads proximally. Although it may diminish in intensity, pain remains a prominent feature. Flare-ups may occur spontaneously. Irreversible tissue damage occurs. Skin is thin and shiny. Edema is absent. Contractures may occur. Radiographs indicate marked demineralization.

Causes

Older literature suggested that development of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) required a triad of conditions: an injury, an abnormal sympathetic response, and a predisposing personality. Most current literature disputes the need for an underlying personality disorder. In August 2000, Schwartzman stated, "There is no evidence that affected patients have a personality disorder, but the severity of pain and the disruption of the patient's life can lead to anxiety and depression."15 Beerthuizen et al reviewed 31 articles that addressed an association between psychiatric illness and CRPS-1. Almost all the studies showed no causal relationship.16

Peterlin et al suggested that migraine may be a risk factor for the development of CRPS, but theirs is the only paper of its type.17

ACE inhibitors have recently been suggested as a possible cause for the development of CRPS.7,18

Differential Diagnoses

Deep Venous Thrombosis and Thrombophlebitis
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Other Problems to Be Considered

Improperly placed splints or casts
Primary neurologic problems, such as carpal tunnel syndrome
Pain and/or edema from fractures or sprains

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • A single, reliable, sensitive, and specific diagnostic test for reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSDS) is not available.
  • Quantitative sensory testing and quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART) may be performed to look for sensory and sweating abnormalities.19

Imaging Studies

  • A 3-phase bone scan and gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been used to diagnose and stage the disease.
  • Standard radiograph findings are normal in as many as 30% of patients. However, they may show osteoporosis as soon as 3-5 weeks of onset.
  • Laser Doppler flow studies have been used to monitor background vasomotor control.
  • A cold pressor test performed in conjunction with thermographic imaging observes vasoconstrictor response.
  • Functional MRI (fMRI) has been used to demonstrate that allodynic stimulation produces objective findings.19

Procedures

  • Many authors believe that the best diagnostic approach involves use of differential neural blockade. In those with sympathetically mediated pain (as opposed to those whose pain is sympathetically independent), response to neural blockade may help guide medical therapy.
    • For cases involving an upper extremity, a stellate ganglion block may be diagnostic and therapeutic. However, failure to relieve pain does not eliminate the diagnosis.1,15
    • Differential blockade has been performed using Bier blocks with a variety of agents, including local anesthetics, bretylium, steroids, ketorolac, reserpine, and guanethidine and clonidine.15,20
    • The rationale for selective neural blockade is to interrupt stimulation to the sympathetic nervous system. Again, this is effective only in those whose pain is sympathetically dependent.15

Treatment

Prehospital Care

There is nothing for prehospital providers to do except transport. Most state guidelines do not include chronic pain syndromes as an indication for narcotic administration.

Emergency Department Care

Definitive care is really beyond the purview of the ED physician. An emergency physician's primary role with patients who have complex regional pain syndrome (CPRS)/reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSDS) is to recognize the possibility of the diagnosis and refer such patients to colleagues who are capable of using available therapies. The 3 basic measures in therapy include pain management, rehabilitation (including physical therapy), and psychological therapy.21

  • Breaking through the pain cycle early increases the likelihood of a better outcome.
  • Once the diagnosis is established, a number of treatment modalities that have been proven helpful are available. The most effective treatment involves differential neural blockade. Children may also benefit from neural blockade.20
  • The anesthesia literature provides good evidence that spinal stimulation is effective.22,23
  • Most patients, especially children, can benefit from physical therapy.10,24,25
  • Tricyclic antidepressants have been used to decrease burning. Gabapentin (Neurontin) and systemic steroids have also been used with varying degrees of success. Other agents include the alpha-1 adrenoreceptor antagonists terazosin and phenoxybenzamine; the alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist clonidine; and the NDMA receptor antagonists ketamine, dextromethorphan, and calcitonin. When treatment reaches a plateau, invasive interventions to be considered include tunneled epidural catheters and neuroaugmentation.
  • Dadure et al recently described a series of pediatric patients with recurrent CRPS who benefited from continuous peripheral nerve blocks given at home.20
  • Acupuncture has been reported to have some value, especially in children.26
  • In a randomized controlled trial of 84 currently pain-free patients with CRPS, Reuben et al used intravenous regional anesthesia with either lidocaine and saline or lidocaine and clonidine.27 All required surgery on the previously affected extremity. The recurrence rate of CRPS was significantly less in those who received the lidocaine and clonidine combination.
  • Topical and intravenous lidocaine have been reported to be effective in some cases. Most of the literature appeared several years ago, but the group at Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia recently reported favorable results for a 5-day lidocaine infusion.28
  • Case reports and small number studies have reported good efficacy for topical and IV infusion of ketamine. As a dissociative anesthetic, the logic is to try to "erase the memory" of the pain stimulation.29,30,31
  • A group in the Netherlands reported significant pain decrease in 8 patients treated with an IV infusion of magnesium.32
  • For patients who cannot be seen in the ED or cannot be treated in an expeditious fashion with neural blockade, the primary care physician who knows the patient best should arrange for narcotic analgesia, recognizing that neuropathic pain may be very resistant to standard analgesics, even potent ones. Patients who fail neural blockade very well may have disease that has progressed to the sympathetic-independent stage, and they are likely to have a lifelong problem. In this group, treatment by specialists in pain management, who have access to more sophisticated and experimental therapies, is mandatory.
  • In the ED, narcotics often are required to provide temporary relief while waiting for definitive treatment to begin. Patients with refractory disease may present to the ED with flare-ups that require narcotics. Although distinguishing between those who are truly in pain and those who are malingering is very difficult, the clinician must not assume that all who present without an obvious painful problem are drug seekers. Those with CRPS/RSDS may have a paucity of objective findings. Many are under the care of a knowledgeable pain expert and do not allow themselves to run out of analgesia.
  • The Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association has produced a very user-friendly guideline document that may be helpful to both clinician and patient.3

Consultations

  • Consider consultation with an anesthesiologist or other qualified pain management specialist regarding management.
  • Consider consultation with physical medicine personnel regarding rehabilitation.
  • Consider consultation with a hand surgeon.

Medication

Specialists in pain management (usually an anesthesiologist or physiatrist) commonly perform neural blockade. Use of pain modifying agents, such as cyclic antidepressants and gabapentin, usually is left to the primary care physician or pain management team.

The ED physician's primary responsibilities are to recognize the disease and refer patients to an appropriate specialist. However, these patients experience severe pain and should be given sufficient analgesia to provide relief. Narcotics usually are required.

Discussion of available agents has been limited to morphine and hydromorphone. ED physicians choose the agent with which they are most familiar and comfortable. Clinicians who choose to use meperidine should remember that it provides some euphoria and also has an active metabolite that may accumulate.

Agents with a short duration of action (such as fentanyl) are not usually appropriate.

Some pain specialists prefer methadone for its long duration of action and mechanism of action benefit. This agent is an NMDA antagonist and may therefore be more effective in neuropathic pain syndromes. Conversion from other opioids to methadone should be done by a qualified pain management professional.33 Other long-acting agents include sustained-release forms of oxycodone and morphine.

Analgesics

Pain relief should be a high priority. Pain control is essential to quality patient care. Analgesics ensure patient comfort, promote pulmonary toilet, and have sedating properties. Note that controversy exists among authors about the appropriateness of chronic narcotic analgesia. Some are opposed. Others note that, when more specific measures fail, patients must have pain relief in order to live their lives. The latter believe that patients with CRPS have a true chronic pain syndrome.


Morphine sulphate (Duramorph, MS Contin)

DOC for analgesia because of reliable and predictable effects, safety profile, and ease of reversibility with naloxone.
Initial dose dependent on whether patient already is taking narcotic analgesics. For patients not using long-term agents, as little as 2 mg IV/SC may be sufficient, though higher doses are often needed. Larger doses may be required in patients taking long-term narcotic analgesics.
Also available in oral form in immediate-release and timed-release preparations. Long-acting form usually is administered q12h, but many believe that it loses much of its effect after 8 h; immediate-release form may be needed for periods of pain "break-through," dose dependent on previous use. ED physician should begin at lowest available dose in newly diagnosed patients.
No intrinsic limit to the amount that can be given exists, as long as patient is observed for signs of adverse effects, especially respiratory depression. Various IV doses are used, commonly titrated until desired effect obtained.

Dosing

Adult

0.05-0.1 mg/kg IV/IM/SC initial, repeated as needed

Pediatric

Not established but commonly given as 0.05-0.1mg/kg

Interactions

Phenothiazines may antagonize analgesic effects of opiate agonists; tricyclic antidepressants, MAOIs, and other CNS depressants may potentiate adverse effects

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; hypotension; potentially compromised airway where establishing rapid airway control would be difficult; severe reactive airway disease; respiratory depression; paralytic ileus

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Avoid in hypotension, respiratory depression, nausea, emesis, constipation, and urinary retention; caution in atrial flutter and other supraventricular tachycardias; has vagolytic action and may increase ventricular response rate


Hydromorphone (Dilaudid)

Used to manage moderate to severe pain. Available IV and PO.

Dosing

Adult

2 mg PO initial; 1 mg IV slow push initial

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

Phenothiazines may antagonize analgesic effects of opiate agonists; tricyclic antidepressants, MAOIs, and other CNS depressants may potentiate adverse effects of morphine

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; hypotension; potentially compromised airway with uncertain rapid airway control; hypotension; respiratory depression; nausea; emesis; constipation; urinary retention

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in atrial flutter and other supraventricular tachycardias; has vagolytic actions and may increase ventricular response rate

Follow-up

Further Inpatient Care

Although not FDA approved in the United States, in some countries, patients with complex regional pain syndrome are hospitalized and placed on continuous intravenous infusions of medications such as lidocaine or ketamine. As a dissociative anesthetic, the latter is intended to "erase" the memory of dysfunctioning neurons. Results have been variable.

Further Outpatient Care

It is in the best interest of patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) to have a physician knowledgeable about this entity orchestrate all care. Appropriate referral is important.

Deterrence/Prevention

It has been well documented that those with complex regional pain syndrome who are diagnosed earliest do the best. Once the disease is well established, it probably cannot be reversed.

Complications

Once refractory to neural blockade, pain is probably lifelong and may be severe enough to be debilitating.

Prognosis

Prognosis of complex regional pain syndrome depends largely on timely diagnosis and use of early aggressive therapy.

Patient Education

Patients should be encouraged to seek out CRPS support groups.

Miscellaneous

Medicolegal Pitfalls

  • Because many clinicians are not aware of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), the possibility of misdiagnosis or late diagnosis with consequent poor outcome exists.
  • Individuals with CRPS/RSDS may depend on potent analgesia to control pain. Do not assume that they are illegitimate drug seekers.

References

  1. Schwartzman RJ. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg. Aug 1993;6(4):531-6. [Medline].

  2. Campbell JN, Meyer RA, Raja SN. Is nociceptor activation by alpha-1 adrenoreceptors the culprit in sympathetically mediated pain?. Am Pain Soc J. 1992;1:3-11.

  3. [Guideline] Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association (RSDSA). Complex regional pain syndrome: treatment guidelines. Jun 2006;[Full Text].

  4. Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Neundorfer B, Birklein F. Mechanical hyperalgesia in complex regional pain syndrome: a role for TNF-alpha?. Neurology. Jul 26 2005;65(2):311-3. [Medline].

  5. Blaes F, Schmitz K, Tschernatsch M, et al. Autoimmune etiology of complex regional pain syndrome (M. Sudeck). Neurology. Nov 9 2004;63(9):1734-6. [Medline].

  6. Oaklander AL, Fields HL. Is reflex sympathetic dystrophy/complex regional pain syndrome type I a small-fiber neuropathy?. Ann Neurol. Jun 2009;65(6):629-38. [Medline].

  7. de Mos M, Huygen FJ, Stricker BH, Dieleman JP, Sturkenboom MC. The association between ACE inhibitors and the complex regional pain syndrome: Suggestions for a neuro-inflammatory pathogenesis of CRPS. Pain. Apr 2009;142(3):218-24. [Medline].

  8. Schwartzman RJ, Erwin KL, Alexander GM. The natural history of complex regional pain syndrome. Clin J Pain. May 2009;25(4):273-80.

  9. Stanton-Hicks M. Complex regional pain syndrome. Anesthesiol Clin North America. Dec 2003;21(4):733-44. [Medline].

  10. Tong HC, Nelson VS. Recurrent and migratory reflex sympathetic dystrophy in children. Pediatr Rehabil. Apr-Jun 2000;4(2):87-9. [Medline].

  11. Kachko L, Efrat R, Ben Ami S, Mukamel M, Katz J. Complex regional pain syndromes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Int. Aug 2008;50(4):523-7. [Medline].

  12. Merskey H, Bogduk N, eds. International Association for the Study of Pain. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. IASP Press; 1996.

  13. Lankford LL. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. In: Hunter JM, et al, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand. Mosby-Year Book; 1990:763-86.

  14. van Hilten JJ, van de Beek WJ, Vein AA, van Dijk JG, Middelkoop HA. Clinical aspects of multifocal or generalized tonic dystonia in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Neurology. Jun 26 2001;56(12):1762-5. [Medline].

  15. Schwartzman RJ. New treatments for reflex sympathetic dystrophy. N Engl J Med. Aug 31 2000;343(9):654-6. [Medline].

  16. Beerthuizen A, van 't Spijker A, Huygen FJ, Klein J, de Wit R. Is there an association between psychological factors and the Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) in adults? A systematic review. Pain. Sep 2009;145(1-2):52-9. [Medline].

  17. Peterlin BL, Rosso AL, Nair S, Young WB, Schwartzman RJ. Migraine may be a risk factor for the development of complex regional pain syndrome. Cephalalgia. Jul 9 2009;[Medline].

  18. Borsook D, Sava S. Pain: Do ACE inhibitors exacerbate complex regional pain syndrome?. Nat Rev Neurol. Jun 2009;5(6):306-8. [Medline].

  19. Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Birklein F. Functional imaging of allodynia in complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology. Mar 14 2006;66(5):711-7. [Medline].

  20. Dadure C, Motais F, Ricard C, Raux O, Troncin R, Capdevila X. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks at home for treatment of recurrent complex regional pain syndrome I in children. Anesthesiology. Feb 2005;102(2):387-91. [Medline].

  21. Markman JD, Philip A. Interventional approaches to pain management. Anesthesiol Clin. Dec 2007;25(4):883-98, viii. [Medline].

  22. Kemler MA, Reulen JP, Barendse GA, van Kleef M, de Vet HC, van den Wildenberg FA. Impact of spinal cord stimulation on sensory characteristics in complex regional pain syndrome type I: a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. Jul 2001;95(1):72-80. [Medline].

  23. Oakley JC, Weiner RL. Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome: a prospective study of 19 patients at 2 centers. Neuromodulation. 1999;2:47-50.

  24. Kemler MA, Rijks CP, de Vet HC. Which patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy are most likely to benefit from physical therapy?. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. May 2001;24(4):272-8. [Medline].

  25. Cleary AG, Sills JA, Davidson JE, Cohen AM. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Rheumatology (Oxford). May 2001;40(5):590-1. [Medline].

  26. Kundu A, Berman B. Acupuncture for pediatric pain and symptom management. Pediatr Clin North Am. Dec 2007;54(6):885-9; x. [Medline].

  27. Reuben SS, Rosenthal EA, Steinberg RB, Faruqi S, Kilaru PA. Surgery on the affected upper extremity of patients with a history of complex regional pain syndrome: the use of intravenous regional anesthesia with clonidine. J Clin Anesth. Nov 2004;16(7):517-22. [Medline].

  28. Schwartzman RJ, Patel M, Grothusen JR, Alexander GM. Efficacy of 5-day continuous lidocaine infusion for the treatment of refractory complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Med. Mar 2009;10(2):401-12. [Medline].

  29. Everett A, Mclean B, Plunkett A, Buckenmaier C. A unique presentation of complex regional pain syndrome type I treated with a continuous sciatic peripheral nerve block and parenteral ketamine infusion: a case report. Pain Med. Sep 2009;10(6):1136-9. [Medline].

  30. Finch PM, Knudsen L, Drummond PD. Reduction of allodynia in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of topical ketamine. Pain. Nov 2009;146(1-2):18-25. [Medline].

  31. Sigtermans MJ, van Hilten JJ, Bauer MC, Arbous MS, Marinus J, Sarton EY, et al. Ketamine produces effective and long-term pain relief in patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1. Pain. Oct 2009;145(3):304-11. [Medline].

  32. Collins S, Zuurmond WW, de Lange JJ, van Hilten BJ, Perez RS. Intravenous magnesium for complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS 1) patients: a pilot study. Pain Med. Jul-Aug 2009;10(5):930-40. [Medline].

  33. Hsu ES. Practical management of complex regional pain syndrome. Am J Ther. Mar-Apr 2009;16(2):147-54. [Medline].

  34. Karmarkar A, Lieberman I. Management of complex regional pain syndrome type II using lidoderm 5% patches. Br J Anaesth. Feb 2007;98(2):261-2. [Medline].

Keywords

complex regional pain syndrome symptoms, complex regional pain syndrome treatment, RSDS, RSD, reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome, causalgia, sympathetic maintained pain syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, CRPS, CRPS I, CRPS II, peripheral nerve injury

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Steven J Parrillo, DO, FACOEP, FACEP, Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine, Jefferson Medical College and Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine; Medical Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Elkins Park; Chair, Emergency Management Committee, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network; Medical Director, Disaster Medicine and Management Masters Program, Philadelphia University
Steven J Parrillo, DO, FACOEP, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Osteopathic Emergency Physicians, American Osteopathic Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Joseph A Salomone III, MD, EMS Medical Director, Kansas City, Missouri; Associate Professor and Staff Physician, Truman Medical Centers/UMKC School of Medicine
Joseph A Salomone III, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, National Association of EMS Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

J Stephen Huff, MD, Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine and Neurology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
J Stephen Huff, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

John D Halamka, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Robert E O'Connor, MD, MPH, Professor and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health System
Robert E O'Connor, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physician Executives, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, Medical Society of Delaware, National Association of EMS Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and Wilderness Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Further Reading

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)