Pregnancy Trauma Workup

  • Author: Andrew K Chang, MD; Chief Editor: Pamela L Dyne, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jul 22, 2011
 

Laboratory Studies

  • Determination of CBC: Pregnancy-induced leukocytosis peaks to levels of 12,000-18,000 per cubic millimeter during the third trimester. During labor, levels as high as 25,000 per cubic millimeter may occur.
  • Determination of electrolyte and glucose levels
  • Blood typing and crossmatching
  • Rhesus (Rh) blood group determination (Administer Rho(D) immune globulin [RhoGAM] if the mother is Rh negative)
  • Urine pregnancy testing, if the status is unknown in a female of reproductive age with trauma
  • Urinalysis
  • Assessment of coagulation profile (Most coagulation factors rise throughout pregnancy, although laboratory values remain unchanged except for fibrinogen levels, which nearly double in value.)
  • Kleihauer-Betke testing: This test (an acid elution test in which adult hemoglobin is eliminated while fetal hemoglobin is resistant and hence stains) is used to detect fetal-to-maternal hemorrhage in excess of that which can be treated with a standard dose of 300 mcg of Rho(D) immune globulin (RhoGAM). In the event of fetal distress, a positive test result may indicate life-threatening hemorrhage in the fetal circulation. The test is useful in Rh-negative mothers because the standard dose of RhoGAM (300 mcg) covers only up to 15 mL of fetal red cells (30 mL of fetal whole blood). In major trauma, additional fetal red cells may come into contact with maternal blood, and the Kleihauer-Betke test helps to determine how much additional RhoGAM to administer. Although this test is usually only indicated for the Rh-negative pregnant patient with major trauma, some advocate its use in all patients as it may correlate with risk for preterm labor. However, it is neither sensitive nor specific for this outcome soit should be used with caution or not at all.
  • Toxicology screening
  • D-dimer: Some obstetricians advocate use of D-dimer testing to help in determining the course of action for placental abruption.
  • Base deficit: In patients with blunt abdominal trauma, data show that base deficit is an early available important indicator to identify intra-abdominal injury.[4]
Next

Imaging Studies

Radiologic examinations must be interpreted in the context of pregnancy-related changes. For example, increased AP diameters, mild pulmonary vascular cephalization, cardiomegaly, and a slightly widened mediastinum are seen in normal pregnancy. Similarly, pelvic radiographs show normal widening of the sacroiliac joints and symphysis pubis.

Radiologic examinations should not be deferred because of the presence of the fetus. Data about injury to the fetus secondary to diagnostic radiology are only suggestive. The 3 primary concerns are the following: radiation-induced cancer, loss of viability, and radiation-induced malformation (small head size). Usually, adverse effects are not expected until the dose is in the 50-100 mGy range (mGy = 0.1 rad). The acquisition of an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph delivers a 0.16-mGy dose to the fetus, while typical dose from CT scanning of the pelvis is approximately 20-50 mGy.

Data about radiation-induced cancer after in utero exposure suggest that risks for radiation-induced cancer fatality, in children younger than 14 years, may be on the order of 1 in 15,000 children. These results occur when each fetus is exposed to 1 mGy of radiation in utero during the second or third trimester. The risk ratio for a 50-mGy exposure is about 1:300. Risk of first-trimester exposure may be higher, but data are less specific.

Loss of viability of the fetus is possible if radiation exposure occurs within 2 weeks of conception. For most diagnostic abdominal examinations, this risk probably is less than 1%. All risk estimates related to this possibility at diagnostic dose levels are derived from animal data. Data suggest that, during this period, no increased risk of malformation exists.

Malformation (small head size) is also a concern. Findings from animal studies suggest a threshold of about 100 mGy, with the most vulnerable period during embryonic development (2-8 wk after conception). Data collected from those affected by the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki suggest that head size may be slightly reduced as a result of exposure to radiation (< 200 mGy). However, reduction in intelligence did not occur when exposure occurred during the 2nd to 8th weeks after conception. A tendency toward induced intellectual deficit from the 8th to 15th weeks after conception was observed (during this period, the brain undergoes rapid neuron development and migration); however, data are uncertain.

As a general rule, abdominal CT should be avoided in early pregnancy because other diagnostic modalities, such as ultrasonography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage, are acceptable alternatives. CT does, however, allow for better visualization of retroperitoneal and intrauterine injuries. Head and chest CT may be used when indicated because the amount of radiation is much less and because few, if any, alternative diagnostic modalities exist.

Ultrasonography

Assess fetal viability and for multiple gestations.

Assess the size, gestational age, and position of the fetus.

Ultrasonography can depict free intraperitoneal fluid or hemorrhage in the mother. The focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination has become routine in many trauma centers and has been shown to have high sensitivity and accuracy in the hands of emergency clinicians and trauma surgeons.

MRI

No reports of adverse effects (but few data) exist.

Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning

No reports of adverse effects (but few data) exist.

Previous
Next

Other Tests

Cardiotocographic monitoring

All pregnant trauma victims of 20-24 weeks of gestational age or greater should be placed on a fetal monitor.

Fetal distress may be the first sign of maternal hemodynamic compromise because the mother will maintain her vital signs by shunting blood away from the relatively low-resistance uterus.

A minimum of 4 hours of monitoring is suggested, even after minor abdominal or flank trauma, to identify patients that might experience placental abruption. This is because clinical signs and symptoms or abruption, such as vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and tenderness, and uterine tenderness, are often absent.

Monitoring for 24 hours is suggested with major trauma or signs of obstetric decompensation, such as persistent uterine contractions, vaginal bleeding, premature rupture of the membranes, or fetal heart rate tracing that causes concern.

Ultrasonography has less than 50% sensitivity in diagnosing placental abruption because the density of a fresh clot of blood behind the placenta is the same as the placenta itself.

Electrocardiography

The electrocardiography (ECG) may change as the diaphragm elevates.

It may show a left-axis deviation with flattened T waves and, possibly, a Q wave in leads III and aVF.

Do not mistake these changes for the ischemic or traumatic changes in blunt chest trauma.

Previous
Next

Procedures

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL)

This study is rarely used nowadays with the advent of ultrasonography. It may be indicated in the pregnant patient where avoidance of radiation exposure through the use of CT is desired and in whom ultrasonography is either unavailable or equivocal. DPL is safe if performed above the umbilicus with an open technique (lower risk of complications such as inadvertent uterine and fetal injury).

Perimortem cesarean delivery

This is performed for two indications: In the case of certain maternal death due to severe head injury or other non-resuscitatable cause, the indication is to save the fetus. In the case of maternal cardiac arrest due to a potentially resuscitatable cause such as a cardiac event or severe blood loss, the indication for the perimortem cesarean delivery is to remove the fetus so as to remove a nonvital organ from the maternal circulation and therefore facilitate the resuscitation.

In either indication, perform this within 4 minutes of cardiac arrest to support neurologic function of the fetus.

The key to rapid delivery is the use of large of incisions.

Perform a midline vertical incision from the xiphoid to the pubis through all layers of the abdominal wall. If the placenta is in an anterior position, cut through it and address the bleeding only after the fetus is delivered.

Perform a midline vertical incision through the upper uterine segment.

Then, remove the neonate, perform suctioning, clamp and cut the cord, and resuscitate the neonate.

Continue resuscitation of the mother.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Andrew K Chang, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center

Andrew K Chang, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Assaad J Sayah, MD  Chief, Department of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance

Assaad J Sayah, MD is a member of the following medical societies: National Association of EMS Physicians

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Eric L Legome, MD  Chief, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center; Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Medical College

Eric L Legome, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John D Halamka, MD, MS  Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Pamela L Dyne, MD  Professor of Clinical Medicine/Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine; Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center

Pamela L Dyne, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Tinker SC, Reefhuis J, Dellinger AM, Jamieson DJ. Epidemiology of maternal injuries during pregnancy in a population-based study, 1997-2005. J Womens Health (Larchmt). Dec 2010;19(12):2211-8. [Medline].

  2. Petrone P, Talving P, Browder T, et al. Abdominal injuries in pregnancy: a 155-month study at two level 1 trauma centers. Injury. Jul 23 2010;[Medline].

  3. Gazmararian JA, Lazorick S, Spitz AM, Ballard TJ, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Prevalence of violence against pregnant women. JAMA. Jun 26 1996;275(24):1915-20. [Medline].

  4. Mofidi M, Hasani A, Kianmehr N. Determining the accuracy of base deficit in diagnosis of intra-abdominal injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Am J Emerg Med. Oct 2010;28(8):933-6. [Medline].

  5. Bochicchio GV, Haan J, Scalea TM. Surgeon-performed focused assessment with sonography for trauma as an early screening tool for pregnancy after trauma. J Trauma. Jun 2002;52(6):1125-8. [Medline].

  6. Connolly AM, Katz VL, Bash KL, McMahon MJ, Hansen WF. Trauma and pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. Jul 1997;14(6):331-6. [Medline].

  7. Crosby WM, Costiloe JP. Safety of lap-belt restraint for pregnant victims of automobile collisions. N Engl J Med. Mar 25 1971;284(12):632-6. [Medline].

  8. Curet MJ, Schermer CR, Demarest GB, Bieneik EJ 3rd, Curet LB. Predictors of outcome in trauma during pregnancy: identification of patients who can be monitored for less than 6 hours. J Trauma. Jul 2000;49(1):18-24; discussion 24-5. [Medline].

  9. Dhanraj D, Lambers D. The incidences of positive Kleihauer-Betke test in low-risk pregnancies and maternal trauma patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2004;190(5):1461-3. [Medline].

  10. El-Kady D, Gilbert WM, Anderson J, Danielsen B, Towner D, Smith LH. Trauma during pregnancy: an analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes in a large population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2004;190(6):1661-8. [Medline].

  11. Esposito TJ. Trauma during pregnancy. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Feb 1994;12(1):167-99. [Medline].

  12. Fildes J, Reed L, Jones N, Martin M, Barrett J. Trauma: the leading cause of maternal death. J Trauma. May 1992;32(5):643-5. [Medline].

  13. Goldman SM, Wagner LK. Radiologic management of abdominal trauma in pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1996;166(4):763-7. [Medline].

  14. Harper M, Parsons L. Maternal deaths due to homicide and other injuries in North Carolina: 1992-1994. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1997;90(6):920-3. [Medline].

  15. Mattox KL, Goetzl L. Trauma in pregnancy. Crit Care Med. Oct 2005;33(10 Suppl):S385-9. [Medline].

  16. Muench MV, Baschat AA, Reddy UM, et al. Kleihauer-betke testing is important in all cases of maternal trauma. J Trauma. Nov 2004;57(5):1094-8. [Medline].

  17. Pak LL, Reece EA, Chan L. Is adverse pregnancy outcome predictable after blunt abdominal trauma?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1998;179(5):1140-4. [Medline].

  18. Pearlman MD, Tintinalli JE, Lorenz RP. Blunt trauma during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. Dec 6 1990;323(23):1609-13. [Medline].

  19. Pearlman MD, Tintinallli JE, Lorenz RP. A prospective controlled study of outcome after trauma during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1990;162(6):1502-7; discussion 1507-10. [Medline].

  20. Poole GV, Martin JN Jr, Perry KG Jr, Griswold JA, Lambert CJ, Rhodes RS. Trauma in pregnancy: the role of interpersonal violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1996;174(6):1873-7; discussion 1877-8. [Medline].

  21. Shah AJ, Kilcline BA. Trauma in pregnancy. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Aug 2003;21(3):615-29. [Medline].

  22. Theodorou DA, Velmahos GC, Souter I, et al. Fetal death after trauma in pregnancy. Am Surg. Sep 2000;66(9):809-12. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.