Acute Angle-Closure Glaucoma Medication

  • Author: Andrew Aherne, MD; Chief Editor: Steven C Dronen, MD, FAAEM   more...
 
Updated: Nov 10, 2010
 

Medication Summary

The goal in treatment of AACG is to reduce IOP. Medical management is the first step. A prompt reduction in IOP using topical and systemic medication decreases the duration of elevated IOP and the potential for visual field loss. IOP reduction is accomplished via suppressing aqueous humor production, eliminating pupillary block, and reversing inflammation. As with any medical intervention, intimate knowledge of the drugs, their indications, contraindications, and potential side effects can aid the physician in providing the best treatment and a favorable outcome.

Next

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors

Class Summary

These are first-line agents that should be used immediately during the initial intervention. They reduce bicarbonate production in the ciliary epithelium and therefore decrease aqueous formation.

Acetazolamide (Diamox)

 

Reduces rate of aqueous humor formation by direct inhibition of enzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA) on secretory ciliary epithelium, causing, in turn, a reduction in IOP. More than 90% of CA must be inhibited before IOP reduction can occur. May reduce IOP by 40-60%. Effects are seen in about an hour, they peak in 4 h, and trough in about 12 h. Derived chemically from sulfa drugs. If one form is not well tolerated, another form may be better or lower dose of the drug may better tolerated. IV administration of this medication may be used for rapid relief of increased IOP. A beneficial effect occurs when used with miotics or mydriatics.

Methazolamide (Neptazane)

 

Reduces aqueous humor formation by inhibiting enzyme carbonic anhydrase, which results in decreased IOP.

Previous
Next

Beta-adrenergic blockers

Class Summary

These agents may lower IOP via their suppression of aqueous humor production and probably not through any affects on the pupil.

Timolol ophthalmic (Timoptic, Timoptic XE)

 

Reduces elevated and normal IOP by reducing aqueous humor production or possibly the outflow.

Carteolol ophthalmic (Ocupress)

 

Nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor. Blocks beta1- and beta2-receptors and has mild intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), with possibly fewer cardiac and lipid profile adverse effects. Precise mechanism by which carteolol decreases IOP is thought to be through reduction of aqueous formation.

Levobetaxolol (Betaxon)

 

Selectively blocks beta1-adrenergic receptors with little or no effect on beta2-receptors. Reduces IOP by reducing production of aqueous humor.

Levobunolol (AKBeta, Betagan)

 

Nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent that lowers IOP by reducing aqueous humor production and may increase outflow of aqueous humor.

Dosages of more than 1 gtt of 0.5% levobunolol twice daily have not been shown to be more effective. If IOP not at satisfactory level on this regimen, concomitant therapy can be instituted. However, do not administer 2 or more topical ophthalmic beta-adrenergic blocking agents simultaneously.

Previous
Next

Alpha-adrenergic agonists

Class Summary

These agents are used as adjunct agents to further decrease IOP secondary to their affect on aqueous humor production.

Apraclonidine (Iopidine)

 

Potent alpha-adrenergic agent selective for alpha2-receptors with minimal cross-reactivity to alpha1-receptors. Suppresses aqueous production. Reduces elevated, as well as normal, IOP whether or not accompanied by glaucoma. Apraclonidine is relatively selective alpha-adrenergic agonist that does not have significant local anesthetic activity. Has minimal cardiovascular effects.

Brimonidine (Alphagan, Alphagan-P)

 

Selective alpha2 receptor that may reduce aqueous humor formation, may decrease inflow, or may increase uveoscleral outflow.

Previous
Next

Corticosteroids

Class Summary

These agents reduce ocular inflammation thereby providing symptomatic relief and augmenting the affects of other medications.

Prednisolone ophthalmic (AK-Pred, Econopred)

 

Used in treatment of acute inflammations following eye surgery or other insults to the eye.

In cases of bacterial infections, concomitant use of anti-infective agents is mandatory. If signs and symptoms do not improve after 2 d, reevaluate the patient. Dosing may be reduced, but advise patients not to discontinue therapy prematurely.

Previous
Next

Ophthalmic agents, miotic

Class Summary

These agents pull the peripheral iris tissue away from the trabecular meshwork helping to eliminate obstructed aqueous humor flow. They are ineffective during the initial period due to the ischemic paralysis of the iris. Miotics should be used after the immediate management and initial reduction of IOP.

Pilocarpine ophthalmic (Pilagan, Pilocar, Pilostat)

 

Patients may be maintained on pilocarpine as long as IOP is controlled and no deterioration in visual fields is present. May be used alone or in combination with other miotics, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, epinephrine, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, or hyperosmotic agents to decrease IOP.

Frequency of instillation and concentration are determined by patient's response. Individuals with heavily pigmented irides may require higher strengths.

Previous
Next

Hyperosmotics

Class Summary

Hyperosmotic agents increase serum osmolarity and cause a fluid shift from the eye into the vascular space. The subsequent osmotic diuresis reduces IOP.

Glycerin (Osmoglyn)

 

Used in glaucoma to interrupt acute attacks. Reduces IOP through its diuretic effects. Adds to tonicity of blood until metabolized and eliminated by kidneys. Maximal reduction of IOP occurs 1 h after glycerin administration. The effect lasts approximately 5 h.

Isosorbide (Ismotic)

 

In the eyes, creates an osmotic gradient between plasma and ocular fluids. Induces diuresis by elevating osmolarity of glomerular filtrate, thereby hindering tubular reabsorption of water. May be used to interrupt an acute attack of glaucoma. Use when less risk of nausea and vomiting, compared with other oral hyperosmotic agents, is needed.

Mannitol (Osmitrol)

 

Reduces elevated IOP when pressure cannot be lowered by other means.

Initially assess for adequate renal function in adults by administering a test dose of 200 mg/kg IV over 3-5 min. Should produce a urine flow of at least 30-50 mL/h of urine over 2-3 h.

In children, assess for adequate renal function by administering a test dose of 200 mg/kg IV over 3-5 min. Should produce a urine flow of at least 1 mL/h over 1-3 h.

Previous
Proceed to Follow-up
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Andrew Aherne, MD  Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center, University Hospital of Brooklyn

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Richard H Sinert, DO  Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine, Research Director, State University of New York College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center

Richard H Sinert, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Michelle Ervin, MD  Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Howard University Hospital

Michelle Ervin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, National Medical Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Douglas Lavenburg, MD  Clinical Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Christiana Care Health Systems

Douglas Lavenburg, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John D Halamka, MD, MS  Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Steven C Dronen, MD, FAAEM  Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, LeConte Medical Center

Steven C Dronen, MD, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors, Ayim K Darkeh, MD, and Mark A Silverberg, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Berkoff DJ, Sanchez LD. An uncommon presentation of acute angle closure glaucoma. J Emerg Med. Jul 2005;29(1):43-4. [Medline].

  2. Yip LW, Aquino MC, Chew PT. Measurement of anterior lens growth after acute primary angle-closure glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. Apr 2007;42(2):321-2. [Medline].

  3. Wang BS, Narayanaswamy A, Amerasinghe N, Zheng C, He M, Chan YH, et al. Increased iris thickness and association with primary angle closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. Jun 7 2010;[Medline].

  4. Cronemberger S, Calixto N, de Andrade AO, Mérula RV. New considerations on pupillary block mechanism. Arq Bras Oftalmol. Feb 2010;73(1):9-15. [Medline].

  5. Ang LP, Ang LP. Current understanding of the treatment and outcome of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma: an Asian perspective. Ann Acad Med Singapore. Mar 2008;37(3):210-5. [Medline].

  6. Rahim SA, Sahlas DJ, Shadowitz S. Blinded by pressure and pain. Lancet. Jun 25-Jul 1 2005;365(9478):2244. [Medline].

  7. Cholongitas E, Pipili C, Dasenaki M. Acute angle closure glaucoma presented with nausea and epigastric pain. Dig Dis Sci. May 2008;53(5):1430-1. [Medline].

  8. Croos R, Thirumalai S, Hassan S, Davis Jda R. Citalopram associated with acute angle-closure glaucoma: case report. BMC Ophthalmol. Oct 4 2005;5:23. [Medline].

  9. Natesh S, Rajashekhara SK, Rao AS, Shetty B. Topiramate-induced angle closure with acute myopia, macular striae. Oman J Ophthalmol. Jan 2010;3(1):26-8. [Medline].

  10. Subak-Sharpe I, Low S, Nolan W, Foster PJ. Pharmacological and environmental factors in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br Med Bull. 2010;93:125-43. [Medline].

  11. Tse DM, Titchener AG, Sarkies N, Robinson S. Acute angle closure glaucoma following head and orbital trauma. Emerg Med J. Dec 2009;26(12):913. [Medline].

  12. Hunter TG, Chong GT, Asrani S, Allingham RR, Blumberg DM. Simultaneous bilateral angle closure glaucoma in a patient with giant cell arteritis. J Glaucoma. Feb 2010;19(2):149-50. [Medline].

  13. Singer MS, Salim S. Bilateral acute angle-closure glaucoma as a complication of facedown spine surgery. Spine J. Sep 2010;10(9):e7-9. [Medline].

  14. Choong YF, Irfan S, Menage MJ. Acute angle closure glaucoma: an evaluation of a protocol for acute treatment. Eye. Oct 1999;13 (Pt 5):613-6. [Medline].

  15. Masselos K, Bank A, Francis IC, Stapleton F. Corneal indentation in the early management of acute angle closure. Ophthalmology. Jan 2009;116(1):25-9. [Medline].

  16. Mansouri K, Ravinet E. Argon-laser iridoplasty in the management of uveitis-induced acute angle-closure glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. Mar-Apr 2009;19(2):304-6. [Medline].

  17. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. Feb 2002;86(2):238-42. [Medline].

  18. Ang LP, Aung T, Chua WH, Yip LW, Chew PT. Visual field loss from primary angle-closure glaucoma: a comparative study of symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. Ophthalmology. Sep 2004;111(9):1636-40. [Medline].

  19. Aung T, Friedman DS, Chew PT, Ang LP, Gazzard G, Lai YF, et al. Long-term outcomes in Asians after acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. Aug 2004;111(8):1464-9. [Medline].

  20. Aung T, Oen FT, Wong HT, et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of brimonidine and timolol on visual field loss after acute primary angle closure. Br J Ophthalmol. Jan 2004;88(1):88-94. [Medline].

  21. Blake DR, Nathan DM. Acute angle closure glaucoma following rapid correction of hyperglycemia. Diabetes Care. Nov 2003;26(11):3197-8. [Medline].

  22. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Epidemiology of angle-closure glaucoma: prevalence, clinical types, and association with peripheral anterior chamber depth in the Egna-Neumarket Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology. May 2000;107(5):998-1003. [Medline].

  23. Fourman S. Diagnosing acute angle-closure glaucoma: a flowchart. Surv Ophthalmol. May-Jun 1989;33(6):491-4. [Medline].

  24. Fricke TR, Mantzioros N, Vingrys AJ. Management of patients with narrow angles and acute angle-closure glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom. Nov 1998;81(6):255-266. [Medline].

  25. Gohdo T, Tsumura T, Iijima H, Kashiwagi K, Tsukahara S. Ultrasound biomicroscopic study of ciliary body thickness in eyes with narrow angles. Am J Ophthalmol. Mar 2000;129(3):342-6. [Medline].

  26. Kramer P, Ritch R. The treatment of acute angle-closure glaucoma revisited. Ann Ophthalmol. Dec 1984;16(12):1101-3. [Medline].

  27. Lam D, Tham C, Lai J, et al. Current approaches to management of acute primary angle closure. Curr Opinion Ophthalmol. 2001;18:146-151.

  28. Lim LS, Aung T, Husain R, Wu YJ, Gazzard G, Seah SK. Acute primary angle closure: configuration of the drainage angle in the first year after laser peripheral iridotomy. Ophthalmology. Aug 2004;111(8):1470-4. [Medline].

  29. Lowe RF. Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. Mar 1970;54(3):161-9. [Medline].

  30. MacCumber M. Management of Ocular Injuries and Emergencies. 1998:237-240.

  31. Markowitz SN, Morin JD. Angle-closure glaucoma: relation between lens thickness, anterior chamber depth and age. Can J Ophthalmol. Dec 1984;19(7):300-2. [Medline].

  32. Ritch R. Assessing the treatment of angle closure. Ophthalmology. Oct 2003;110(10):1867-8. [Medline].

  33. Salmon JF. The management of acute angle-closure glaucoma. Eye. Oct 1999;13 (Pt 5):609-10. [Medline].

  34. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Friedman DS. Interventions for angle-closure glaucoma: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. Oct 2003;110(10):1869-78; quiz 1878-9, 1930. [Medline].

  35. Senthil S, Garudadri C, Rao HB, Maheshwari R. Bilateral simultaneous acute angle closure caused by sulphonamide derivatives: a case series. Indian J Ophthalmol. May-Jun 2010;58(3):248-52. [Medline].

  36. Tarongoy P, Ho CL, Walton DS. Angle-closure glaucoma: the role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol. Mar-Apr 2009;54(2):211-25. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.