Child Abuse Treatment & Management
- Author: Julia Magana, MD; Chief Editor: Kirsten A Bechtel, MD more...
The prehospital emergency medical (EM) provider is in an ideal position to observe and document the initial appearance of the child and family in their home environment.
The initial statement of mechanism of injury should be carefully documented. In cases of abuse, the family may change the story and the initial history is critical. Observations and concerns should be conveyed to hospital personnel, and a detailed descriptive report should be written.
Most importantly, the EM provider must report or see that a report is made to Child Protective Services (CPS) when child abuse is suspected.
EM providers can assist with prehospital provider training.
Emergency Department Care
The initial medical treatment of the physically abused child in the ED should proceed no differently from treatment of any injured child, except that forensic data collection and analysis are of particular and pressing importance after medical stabilization.
Initial assessment and treatment of the seriously physically abused child should proceed according to established guidelines, such as those contained in the Advanced Trauma Life Support Course for Physicians or in the textbook of Advanced Pediatric Life Support. Priorities include recognition of airway, breathing, and circulatory problems.
Intracranial lesions should prompt neurosurgical consultation for management and decision about the need for surgical intervention. Such intervention should be guided by the results of a clinical examination, CT scan, and clinical course.
Cervical spine injuries require consideration in the child who is unresponsive, seizing, or has other signs or symptoms of inflicted head injury. All patients with suspected head injury or altered mental status should be kept in cervical spinal precautions until the spine is cleared.
Blunt abdominal trauma from child abuse should be identified quickly and treated aggressively because of its attendant high mortality.
Photographs should be taken of all visible cutaneous injuries before treatment.
A detailed report, preferably typed with appropriate drawings, should be prepared as soon as possible. Documentation does not require offering a definitive opinion whether child abuse has occurred. The role of the EM provider is to suspect child abuse, document history and findings, and report to the authorities, not to confirm abuse.
Establishing an institutional protocol for the evaluation and treatment of abuse is helpful. Such a protocol should state the following:
The diagnostic and therapeutic steps that are to be taken
Who should be consulted, such as institutional social workers, pediatrician, or child abuse team
How to notify state/county CPS agencies and local law enforcement; child abuse is both a dependency and a criminal matter, so the report should go to the law enforcement agency in which the incident occurred
The CPS and or law enforcement report should be made before the child leaves the ED. The child should be kept in the protective environment of the hospital until CPS can determine if the child will be safe at home. Where the child will go on discharge is the responsibility of CPS not the ED physician.
If other young children are at home, they may need to be evaluated for injury and safety by CPS and or a physician. Siblings younger than 2 years should have a skeletal survey obtained to screen for occult fractures.
When the ED provider suspects medical child abuse (also known as Munchausen-by-proxy), it is best not to confront the parent in the ED. He or she may become angry, leave, and not return and will likely seek care elsewhere, effectively delaying intervention. It is critical to discuss the case as soon as possible with a child abuse pediatrician who can assemble a team involving CPS and other appropriate parties. Intervention must be carefully coordinated and cannot usually take place in the ED.
The infant who is brought to the hospital dead or who dies shortly after admission presents a particular diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. Often the central differential diagnosis is between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and child abuse. Depending on state or regional protocols, the medical examiner should be called immediately for decisions about further testing and disposition of the body. Families in such circumstances should be managed supportively while appropriate investigative information is gathered. CPS and law enforcement should be contacted.
Although discussing the possible differential diagnosis (eg, SIDS) with the family may be appropriate, it is important to remember that SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion, requiring a complete autopsy and death scene investigation. Even when abuse is strongly suspected, parents/family should be treated in a respectful, nonconfrontational manner. Little is gained from an accusatory or inconsiderate approach to families.
The practitioner's role, when possible, is to offer an opinion about the presence of abuse for the purposes of child safety. If the practitioner is not comfortable offering an opinion about inflicted trauma, it is incumbent on that practitioner to urgently consult a child abuse specialist.
The best preparation for a possible future court appearance to provide testimony is being thorough throughout the initial ED encounter. It is not the ED medical provider’s job to determine the likely perpetrator.
Medical practitioners are held under the "reasonable medical certainty" standard. Although this is difficult to quantify, such a standard is suggested to mean that the practitioner is certain enough of the diagnosis to offer treatment for that specific diagnosis.
If the child’s presentation is clearly from abuse, document this plainly in the medical record. List the injuries identified and note that they are consistent with inflicted injury or are inconsistent with the given history.
Document key phrases that the child says using quotation marks. Consider documenting what questions you asked and what response you received to help your memory of the event if called to testify.
Medical providers should avoid offering an opinion that abuse did or did not occur based on their feelings about a parent or caretaker. Such criteria are notoriously inaccurate. Likewise, providers may not know the entire story or have access to scene investigation that could significantly impact an opinion.
Medical providers are at greater medicolegal risk if abuse is missed and a child is further injured than in reporting possible abuse that later turns out to be something else. Medical providers who report in good faith have immunity.
The ED often has the advantage of immediate social work consultation and multidisciplinary collaboration.
The medical care of the seriously injured abused child should be team based and include a physician experienced in the treatment of pediatric emergencies, a surgeon experienced in managing childhood trauma, and a clinician experienced in the management of child abuse. The team may require the services of specialists in pediatric radiology, neurology, neurosurgery, pediatric orthopedics, and ophthalmology.
Subspecialty child abuse consultation can be beneficial. Specialists such as child abuse pediatricians, available in many areas of the country, are able to assist the practitioner by establishing or corroborating a medicolegal diagnosis and by testifying in court as needed. The Ray Helfer Society maintains a list of child abuse pediatricians.
Practitioners who suspect that a child has been or will be abused are mandated immediately to make a report to the appropriate state child protection agency.
Reporting should be done ideally soon after there is a reasonable suspicion of abuse and definitely before a child is discharged from the hospital. CPS and law enforcement need a certain amount of time to become familiar with the case, check for past reports, arrive at the hospital, and learn about the findings and concerns of ED providers. In some states, it is mandated that the telephone and then the written report must occur within a certain number of hours after the telephone report is made.
Usually, it is appropriate to notify parents when a report to child protective authorities is being made. An exception to this rule can be made if such notification may cause the caregiver to flee with or without the child or otherwise cause harm to the child.
Reporting should be done before the child is discharged so CPS can help determine disposition. Depending on the type of abuse reported and local protocols, CPS may come to the ED, follow in a determined amount of time, or close the case upon review.
Practitioners should make an expeditious report to the appropriate law enforcement agency. Indeed, some states require such a report.
Nurses play critical roles as team members in identifying and treating the physically abused child. As mandated reporters, they are also responsible for reporting their suspicions. Hospital protocol can allow for one person on a team to make the actual report. All do not have to make a separate report on the same child; however, all will be liable if the report is not made. Nursing history should be carefully documented and include direct quotes of questions and answers. Such nursing history can be compared later with other histories for inconsistencies.
Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Acker D, Carle M, Webb T, Brenzel AJ. Bruising missed as a prognostic indicator of future fatal and near-fatal physical child abuse. Pediatric Academic Societies’ Annual Meeting Honolulu, HI. 2008.
Pierce MC, Smith S, Kaczor K. Bruising in infants: those with a bruise may be abused. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Dec. 25(12):845-7. [Medline].
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Health Education Labor and Pensions. Subcommittee on Children and Families. Protecting children, strengthening families : reauthorizing CAPTA : hearing before the Subcommittee on Children and Families of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred eleventh Congress. S. 3817 ed. Washington. 2010.
Helfer RE. Why most physicians don't get involved in child abuse cases and what to do about it. Child Today. 1975 May-Jun. 4(3):28-32. [Medline].
US Department of health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children Youth and Families Children’s Bureau. December 12, 2012. Undefined. 2011.
Monuteaux MC, Lee L, Fleegler E. Children injured by violence in the United States: emergency department utilization, 2000-2008. Acad Emerg Med. 2012 May. 19(5):535-40. [Medline].
Bellis MA, Hughes K, Jones A, Perkins C, McHale P. Childhood happiness and violence: a retrospective study of their impacts on adult well-being. BMJ Open. 2013. 3(9):e003427. [Medline].
Dube SR, Felitti VJ, Dong M, Chapman DP, Giles WH, Anda RF. Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: the adverse childhood experiences study. Pediatrics. 2003 Mar. 111(3):564-72. [Medline].
Dube SR, Miller JW, Brown DW, Giles WH, Felitti VJ, Dong M. Adverse childhood experiences and the association with ever using alcohol and initiating alcohol use during adolescence. J Adolesc Health. 2006 Apr. 38(4):444.e1-10. [Medline].
Danese A, Tan M. Childhood maltreatment and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2013 May 21. [Medline].
Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998 May. 14(4):245-58. [Medline].
Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, Walker JD, Whitfield C, Perry BD. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006 Apr. 256(3):174-86. [Medline].
Deans KJ, Thackeray J, Askegard-Giesmann JR, Earley E, Groner JI, Minneci PC. Mortality increases with recurrent episodes of nonaccidental trauma in children. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul. 75(1):161-5. [Medline].
10 Leading Causes of Death by Age Group, United States-- 2010. Office of Statistics and Programming, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC using WISQARS. 2010.
Cole C. The memory of children. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1978.
Pierce MC, Bertocci GE, Janosky JE, Aguel F, Deemer E, Moreland M. Femur fractures resulting from stair falls among children: an injury plausibility model. Pediatrics. 2005 Jun. 115(6):1712-22. [Medline].
King WK, Kiesel EL, Simon HK. Child abuse fatalities: are we missing opportunities for intervention?. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Apr. 22(4):211-4. [Medline].
Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A, Reinert SE, Hay TC. Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA. 1999 Feb 17. 281(7):621-6. [Medline].
Ricci L, Giantris A, Merriam P, Hodge S, Doyle T. Abusive head trauma in Maine infants: medical, child protective, and law enforcement analysis. Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Mar. 27(3):271-83. [Medline].
Brown T. AAP updates guideline on child physical abuse. Medscape Medical News. WebMD Inc. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/843827. Accessed: May 13, 2015.
Christian CW. The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2015 May. 135(5):e1337-54. [Medline].
Carpenter RF. The prevalence and distribution of bruising in babies. Arch Dis Child. 1999 Apr. 80(4):363-6. [Medline].
Labbe J, Caouette G. Recent skin injuries in normal children. Pediatrics. 2001 Aug. 108(2):271-6. [Medline].
Mortimer PE, Freeman M. Are facial bruises in babies ever accidental?. Arch Dis Child. 1983 Jan. 58(1):75-6. [Medline].
Pascoe JM, Hildebrandt HM, Tarrier A, Murphy M. Patterns of skin injury in nonaccidental and accidental injury. Pediatrics. 1979 Aug. 64(2):245-7. [Medline].
Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Aldridge S, O'Flynn J, Lorenz DJ. Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma. Pediatrics. 2010 Jan. 125(1):67-74. [Medline].
Sugar NF, Taylor JA, Feldman KW. Bruises in infants and toddlers: those who don't cruise rarely bruise. Puget Sound Pediatric Research Network. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Apr. 153(4):399-403. [Medline].
Sheets LK, Leach ME, Koszewski IJ, Lessmeier AM, Nugent M, Simpson P. Sentinel injuries in infants evaluated for child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2013 Apr. 131(4):701-7. [Medline].
Stephenson T, Bialas Y. Estimation of the age of bruising. Arch Dis Child. 1996 Jan. 74(1):53-5. [Medline].
Langlois NE, Gresham GA. The ageing of bruises: a review and study of the colour changes with time. Forensic Sci Int. 1991 Sep. 50(2):227-38. [Medline].
Kemp AM, Maguire SA, Nuttall D, Collins P, Dunstan F. Bruising in children who are assessed for suspected physical abuse. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Dec 4. [Medline].
Degraw M, Hicks RA, Lindberg D,. Incidence of fractures among children with burns with concern regarding abuse. Pediatrics. 2010 Feb. 125(2):e295-9. [Medline].
Maguire S, Moynihan S, Mann M, Potokar T, Kemp AM. A systematic review of the features that indicate intentional scalds in children. Burns. 2008 Dec. 34(8):1072-81. [Medline].
Kemp AM, Dunstan F, Harrison S, Morris S, Mann M, Rolfe K. Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review. BMJ. 2008. 337:a1518. [Medline].
Arkader A, Friedman JE, Warner WC Jr, Wells L. Complete distal femoral metaphyseal fractures: a harbinger of child abuse before walking age. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Oct-Nov. 27(7):751-3. [Medline].
Kleinman PK, Perez-Rossello JM, Newton AW, Feldman HA, Kleinman PL. Prevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct. 197(4):1005-8. [Medline].
Helfer RE, Slovis TL, Black M. Injuries resulting when small children fall out of bed. Pediatrics. 1977 Oct. 60(4):533-5. [Medline].
Lyons TJ, Oates RK. Falling out of bed: a relatively benign occurrence. Pediatrics. 1993 Jul. 92(1):125-7. [Medline].
Nimityongskul P, Anderson LD. The likelihood of injuries when children fall out of bed. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987 Mar-Apr. 7(2):184-6. [Medline].
Reece RM, Sege R. Childhood head injuries: accidental or inflicted?. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jan. 154(1):11-5. [Medline].
Rooks VJ, Eaton JP, Ruess L, Petermann GW, Keck-Wherley J, Pedersen RC. Prevalence and evolution of intracranial hemorrhage in asymptomatic term infants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Jun. 29(6):1082-9. [Medline].
Kellogg N. Oral and dental aspects of child abuse and neglect. Pediatrics. 2005 Dec. 116(6):1565-8. [Medline].
Lane WG, Dubowitz H, Langenberg P. Screening for occult abdominal trauma in children with suspected physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2009 Dec. 124(6):1595-602. [Medline].
Lindberg D, Makoroff K, Harper N, Laskey A, Bechtel K, Deye K. Utility of hepatic transaminases to recognize abuse in children. Pediatrics. 2009 Aug. 124(2):509-16. [Medline].
Holmes JF, Sokolove PE, Brant WE, Palchak MJ, Vance CW, Owings JT. Identification of children with intra-abdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 May. 39(5):500-9. [Medline].
Anderst JD, Carpenter SL, Abshire TC. Evaluation for bleeding disorders in suspected child abuse. Pediatrics. 2013 Apr. 131(4):e1314-22. [Medline].
Archer JR, Wood DM, Dargan PI. How to use toxicology screening tests. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2012 Oct. 97(5):194-9. [Medline].
Moller M, Gareri J, Koren G. A review of substance abuse monitoring in a social services context: a primer for child protection workers. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Winter. 17(1):e177-93. [Medline].
Oral R, Bayman L, Assad A, Wibbenmeyer L, Buhrow J, Austin A. Illicit drug exposure in patients evaluated for alleged child abuse and neglect. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Jun. 27(6):490-5. [Medline].
Hoffman RJ, Nelson L. Rational use of toxicology testing in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2001 Apr. 13(2):183-8. [Medline].
Lindberg DM, Shapiro RA, Blood EA, Steiner RD, Berger RP,. Utility of hepatic transaminases in children with concern for abuse. Pediatrics. 2013 Feb. 131(2):268-75. [Medline].
Bennett BL, Mahabee-Gittens M, Chua MS, Hirsch R. Elevated cardiac troponin I level in cases of thoracic nonaccidental trauma. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Oct. 27(10):941-4. [Medline].
Day F, Clegg S, McPhillips M, Mok J. A retrospective case series of skeletal surveys in children with suspected non-accidental injury. J Clin Forensic Med. 2006 Feb. 13(2):55-9. [Medline].
Meyer JS, Gunderman R, Coley BD, Bulas D, Garber M, Karmazyn B. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) on suspected physical abuse-child. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Feb. 8(2):87-94. [Medline].
Prosser I, Maguire S, Harrison SK, Mann M, Sibert JR, Kemp AM. How old is this fracture? Radiologic dating of fractures in children: a systematic review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr. 184(4):1282-6. [Medline].
Lindberg DM, Shapiro RA, Laskey AL, Pallin DJ, Blood EA, Berger RP. Prevalence of abusive injuries in siblings and household contacts of physically abused children. Pediatrics. 2012 Aug. 130(2):193-201. [Medline].